Russian Pharmaceutical Market 2020 (Pdf, 3.8

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Russian Pharmaceutical Market 2020 (Pdf, 3.8 Table of contents Summary 3 1. Volume of the Russian pharmaceutical market 6 2. Commercial drugs segment 14 3. Drug reimbursement program (DRP) 37 4. Volumes of purchases of drugs for needs of HCI 55 5. Dietary Supplements 70 6. Cosmetics 83 7. Pharmacy chains 94 8. Distributors 103 9. Manufacturing 111 DSM Group General Director Analytical Report Sergey Shulyak Russian Pharmaceutical Market Results of 2020 Director of the Department of Stategic Research Address: Julia Nechaeva 7, Building 2, 5th Yamskogo Polya Street, Moscow, 125124 Analyst Tel: Irina Sharapova +7 (495) 780-72-63, +7 (495) 780-72-64 Head of PR Zhalya Gadzhieva www.dsm.ru, www.dsmgifts.ru Annual report 2020 Summary 2020 turned out to be unprecedented for (23% each, respectively). It is of note that everyone. Any industry’s performance in the opinion of most Russians the Russian is evaluated on the basis of the impact healthcare system (doctors, medical staff and of Covid-19. It is the pandemic of the other Russian public healthcare workers) did coronavirus infection that was the main their utmost during the spread of Covid-19 driver of the changes on the market and (48%) or even more (22%). in the economy. It has changed many of the established trends and tendencies and Certain laws were passed to support the now it is much more difficult to analyze and industry, including legislative acts supposed forecast the current situation. to prevent problems with the provision of the population with drugs. In March, the State For the pharmaceutical industry the Covid Duma passed through final reading a law on year was some kind of a challenge and a freezing drug prices during pandemics. Now, test for strength. An increase in sales due in certain circumstances, the government to the feverish demand for drugs, the rise of will be able to control prices for products in the public segment, the growing importance pharmacy chains. and acceleration of legislative initiatives - all this significantly influenced both the In April, the State Duma passed a law on overall market dynamics and the market distance selling of drugs. In 2020, the law environment. Furthermore, all this was applied to over-the-counter drugs, but in case happening against the changing conditions of an emergency and a risk of the spread that all of us had to get adjusted to. of diseases dangerous for the public the government may temporarily allow distance So, it is not surprising that among the events selling also of certain Rx drugs. said to be the key events of 2020 were the coronavirus (61% of Russians think so, One of the most significant legislative initiatives according to the VCIOM (Russian Public of the government was the introduction of the Opinion Research Centre) December 2020 procedure for accelerated registration of drugs survey), self-isolation and remote working and medical products in case of an emergency. 3 The initiative enabled Russian manufacturers became a growth driver. The drug names to promptly register and launch on the market varied but owing to a high demand for two drugs for the treatment of the coronavirus them the market in general showed positive infection: Favipiravir and Levilimab. The dynamics in roubles (+10.6%) and fell only accelerated registration made it possible to by 2.3% in packages. offer on the market Russian Covid-19 vaccines and to start mass vaccination already in At the end of 2020, imported drugs in the January 2021. overall market accounted for 56.3% in roubles, and for 31.4% in packages. In volume In 2020, Russia’s pharmaceutical market terms, the market growth was negative both was worth over 2,040 billion roubles, which for made-in-Russia drugs (-4%) and foreign- is by 9.8% more than in 2019. In volume made ones (-3%). In rouble terms, localized terms, sales of drugs dropped by 4% to come drugs grew by 13%, and imported ones - to 6.17 billion packages. by 8%. Those figures account for the non- achievement of the Pharma-2020 Strategy The ultimate performance of the targets. pharmaceutical market in 2020 was conditioned on the consumer and the The top-ranking manufacturers remained consumer’s response to Covid-19, namely, foreign companies: Sanofi, Novartis the consumer demand shift factor. An and Bayer. There are three Russian increased demand for a certain group of manufacturers in the top 20: OTCpharm, drugs, driven by the news about methods of Biocad and Pharmstandard. the treatment of the coronavirus infection, increased sales or, sometimes, caused As before, the main players in the new shortages of drugs, as manufacturers were online sales segment are pharmacy chains. not always ready to promptly meet the That is why most of the eCom business emerging needs. volumes are within the pharmacy retail sector. In 2020, pharmacy eCom was worth Alongside high dynamics in the commercial around 93.2 billion roubles (drugs and segment, public purchases of drugs continue parapharmaceuticals), which corresponds to be a growth driver owing to additional to 6.6% of the pharmacy market capacity. In funding of national projects. The highest December, the figure grew already to 8.2%. growth in the purchase volumes in 2020 Whereas the sales dynamics across the was recorded for drugs for needs of HCI. market makes for around 10%, the online The major growth drivers were the «Fight turnovers grew against 2019 by 62%. Cancer» programme and the federal heart disease project launched in 2020. 2020 saw the continuation of the trend towards consolidation of major players, The situation in the commercial segment though mainly through internal expansion of drugs in 2020 was quite confused: from rather than through mergers. As a result, panic buying in March to nearly negative the share of the top 20 players grew to dynamics in the summer. «Anti-covid» drugs 68%. The top performer by consolidation 4 Annual report 2020 of pharmacies and pharmacy chains was largest distributors on the pharmaceutical ASNA, with a 14.4% share. Among traditional market was 74.1%. chains, the maximum share was held by Rigla chain: 6.7%. Erkapharm GC remained According to our forecasts, in 2021 the the third, with a 4.8% share. market will be worth 2,171 billion roubles, which is by 6% more than in 2020. Any other One of the notable events in the distributor growth factors are hardly probable. One of segment was the change of the leader. In the great expectations is the return to the 2020, distributor Puls with 14.7% came on «pre-covid» consumption patterns. top. Distributor Protek with 14.0% moved down to the second position. The third- ranking was distributor Katren with 13.8%. At the end of the year, the total share of the 10 5 Volume of the Russian 1. pharmaceutical market When written in Chinese, the word ‘crisis’ is composed of two characters. One represents danger and the other represents opportunity. John Fitzgerald Kennedy In 2020, the world was following the news It was decided that as on July 1, 2020, drugs in on the spread of the coronavirus pandemic: Russia would have to be labelled. In its Order the number of infected people, methods of No. 955 dated June 30, 2020, the government treatment, restrictive measures and their set special procedures for imports and impact on the economy, the second and, release for use of unlabelled drugs. probably, the third waves, development of vaccines, the number of vaccinated people, Following the introduction of the identification and so on. Either way, the topic remains a and tracking system, many pharmaceutical first-priority one in view of the global spread manufacturers, distributors and pharmacy of the infection and high fatality rates. chains started lamenting about failures Covid-19 is, certainly, the major factor for the in the information system for monitoring development of the pharmaceutical market movements of drugs along the supply chain, last year. It influenced the market in many which froze drug sales. As it all happened at ways, involving economic processes, state the time of a peak in the demand, the Ministry regulation, and consumer demand. of Industry and Trade provisionally allowed release of drugs a notification basis. We always analyze the market environment, in the first place, in terms of the applicable Given the epidemiological situation in the legislation. In this context, the pandemic country and an increased demand for drugs, turned out to be kind of an accelerator that the mandatory labelling operator «The speeded up the enactment of certain laws. Centre for Development of Perspective Technologies» (CRPT) stopped charging drug But for Covid-19, labelling would have labelling fees. certainly be named as the key event of the year. But in the period of the coronavirus, It was done when pharmacies started facing labelling became a stress test for the shortages of certain drugs, especially, amid a industry. The decision was made though higher demand for medications badly needed the pharmaceutical market participants for the treatment of the coronavirus infection. warned that amid the pandemic it could cause extremely adverse consequences At the end of 2020, the Centre for Development for everyone: producers, pharmaceutical of Perspective Technologies announced that companies, retailers and, ultimately, for pharmacies and medical organizations consumers, i.e. patients who need drugs. the introduced facilitated procedures for drug 6 Annual report 2020 labelling would have no limit in time, and for Many procedures can be now performed economic agents they would remain in force electronically; GMP certificates have until July 1, 2021. been extended; options for remote GMP inspections of manufacturing sites are To create conditions for a smooth transition available, and so on.
Recommended publications
  • COVID-19) Pandemic on National Antimicrobial Consumption in Jordan
    antibiotics Article An Assessment of the Impact of Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Pandemic on National Antimicrobial Consumption in Jordan Sayer Al-Azzam 1, Nizar Mahmoud Mhaidat 1, Hayaa A. Banat 2, Mohammad Alfaour 2, Dana Samih Ahmad 2, Arno Muller 3, Adi Al-Nuseirat 4 , Elizabeth A. Lattyak 5, Barbara R. Conway 6,7 and Mamoon A. Aldeyab 6,* 1 Clinical Pharmacy Department, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid 22110, Jordan; [email protected] (S.A.-A.); [email protected] (N.M.M.) 2 Jordan Food and Drug Administration (JFDA), Amman 11181, Jordan; [email protected] (H.A.B.); [email protected] (M.A.); [email protected] (D.S.A.) 3 Antimicrobial Resistance Division, World Health Organization, Avenue Appia 20, 1211 Geneva, Switzerland; [email protected] 4 World Health Organization Regional Office for the Eastern Mediterranean, Cairo 11371, Egypt; [email protected] 5 Scientific Computing Associates Corp., River Forest, IL 60305, USA; [email protected] 6 Department of Pharmacy, School of Applied Sciences, University of Huddersfield, Huddersfield HD1 3DH, UK; [email protected] 7 Institute of Skin Integrity and Infection Prevention, University of Huddersfield, Huddersfield HD1 3DH, UK * Correspondence: [email protected] Citation: Al-Azzam, S.; Mhaidat, N.M.; Banat, H.A.; Alfaour, M.; Abstract: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has overlapping clinical characteristics with bacterial Ahmad, D.S.; Muller, A.; Al-Nuseirat, respiratory tract infection, leading to the prescription of potentially unnecessary antibiotics. This A.; Lattyak, E.A.; Conway, B.R.; study aimed at measuring changes and patterns of national antimicrobial use for one year preceding Aldeyab, M.A.
    [Show full text]
  • KALETRA (Lopinavir/Ritonavir)
    HIGHLIGHTS OF PRESCRIBING INFORMATION CONTRAINDICATIONS These highlights do not include all the information needed to use • Hypersensitivity to KALETRA (e.g., toxic epidermal necrolysis, Stevens- KALETRA safely and effectively. See full prescribing information for Johnson syndrome, erythema multiforme, urticaria, angioedema) or any of KALETRA. its ingredients, including ritonavir. (4) • Co-administration with drugs highly dependent on CYP3A for clearance KALETRA (lopinavir and ritonavir) tablet, for oral use and for which elevated plasma levels may result in serious and/or life- KALETRA (lopinavir and ritonavir) oral solution threatening events. (4) Initial U.S. Approval: 2000 • Co-administration with potent CYP3A inducers where significantly reduced lopinavir plasma concentrations may be associated with the potential for RECENT MAJOR CHANGES loss of virologic response and possible resistance and cross resistance. (4) Contraindications (4) 12/2019 WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS The following have been observed in patients receiving KALETRA: INDICATIONS AND USAGE • The concomitant use of KALETRA and certain other drugs may result in KALETRA is an HIV-1 protease inhibitor indicated in combination with other known or potentially significant drug interactions. Consult the full antiretroviral agents for the treatment of HIV-1 infection in adults and prescribing information prior to and during treatment for potential drug pediatric patients (14 days and older). (1) interactions. (5.1, 7.3) • Toxicity in preterm neonates: KALETRA oral solution should not be used DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION in preterm neonates in the immediate postnatal period because of possible Tablets: May be taken with or without food, swallowed whole and not toxicities. A safe and effective dose of KALETRA oral solution in this chewed, broken, or crushed.
    [Show full text]
  • Hepatitis C Agents Therapeutic Class Review
    Hepatitis C Agents Therapeutic Class Review (TCR) November 2, 2018 No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, digital scanning, or via any information storage or retrieval system without the express written consent of Magellan Rx Management. All requests for permission should be mailed to: Magellan Rx Management Attention: Legal Department 6950 Columbia Gateway Drive Columbia, Maryland 21046 The materials contained herein represent the opinions of the collective authors and editors and should not be construed to be the official representation of any professional organization or group, any state Pharmacy and Therapeutics committee, any state Medicaid Agency, or any other clinical committee. This material is not intended to be relied upon as medical advice for specific medical cases and nothing contained herein should be relied upon by any patient, medical professional or layperson seeking information about a specific course of treatment for a specific medical condition. All readers of this material are responsible for independently obtaining medical advice and guidance from their own physician and/or other medical professional in regard to the best course of treatment for their specific medical condition. This publication, inclusive of all forms contained herein, is intended to be educational in nature and is intended to be used for informational purposes only. Send comments and suggestions to [email protected]. Proprietary Information. Restricted Access – Do not disseminate or copy without approval. © 2004–2018 Magellan Rx Management. All Rights Reserved. FDA-APPROVED INDICATIONS Drug Mfr FDA-Approved Indications Interferons peginterferon alfa-2a Genentech Chronic hepatitis C (CHC) 1 (Pegasys®) .
    [Show full text]
  • Jan7merck to Present New Data from Clinical Trials Evaluating ISENTRESS® HD (Raltegravir) and Investigational HIV Therapies Doravirine and MK- 8591 at IAS 2017
    NEWS RELEASE Jan7Merck to Present New Data from Clinical Trials Evaluating ISENTRESS® HD (raltegravir) and Investigational HIV Therapies Doravirine and MK- 8591 at IAS 2017 7/6/2017 Merck (NYSE:MRK), known as MSD outside the United States and Canada, today announced that new data from the company’s HIV portfolio and pipeline are scheduled to be presented at the 9th IAS Conference on HIV Science (IAS 2017). Presentations include late-breaker abstracts from two Phase 3 pivotal clinical trials – Week 96 data from ONCEMRK, a study evaluating once-daily ISENTRESS ® HD (raltegravir) in combination with other antiretroviral agents in previously untreated adult patients with HIV-1 infection, and Week 48 data from DRIVE-AHEAD, a study evaluating doravirine (MK-1439), an investigational non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) as part of a xed dose regimen containing doravirine (DOR), lamivudine (3TC), and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) compared to a regimen containing efavirenz (EFV), emtricitabine (FTC), and TDF in previously untreated adult patients with HIV-1 infection. In addition, a late-breaker abstract will be presented of a Phase 1 study of MK-8591, Merck’s investigational nucleoside reverse transcriptase translocation inhibitor (NRTTI) in adult patients with HIV-1 infection. IAS 2017 is taking place in Paris, France, from July 23-26, 2017. “Merck has never wavered in our commitment to addressing the treatment needs of people living with HIV, and the data to be presented at IAS 2017 on our portfolio and our pipeline reect that commitment,” said Dr. George Hanna, associate vice president, clinical research, Merck Research Laboratories. In the United States, once-daily ISENTRESS HD was approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) on May 26, 1 2017, in combination with other antiretroviral agents, for the treatment of HIV-1 infection in adults, and pediatric patients weighing at least 40 kg, who are treatment-naïve or whose virus has been suppressed on an initial regimen of ISENTRESS 400 mg given twice daily.
    [Show full text]
  • Antimicrobial Activity of Cationic
    ANTIMICROBIAL ACTIVITY OF CATIONIC ANTISEPTICS IN LAYER-BY-LAYER THIN FILM ASSEMBLIES A Thesis by CHARLENE MYRIAH DVORACEK Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE May 2009 Major Subject: Mechanical Engineering ANTIMICROBIAL ACTIVITY OF CATIONIC ANTISEPTICS IN LAYER-BY-LAYER THIN FILM ASSEMBLIES A Thesis by CHARLENE MYRIAH DVORACEK Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE Approved by: Chair of Committee, Jaime Grunlan Committee Members, Michael Benedik Xinghang Zhang Head of Department, Dennis O'Neal May 2009 Major Subject: Mechanical Engineering iii ABSTRACT Antimicrobial Activity of Cationic Antiseptics in Layer-by-Layer Thin Film Assemblies. (May 2009) Charlene Myriah Dvoracek, B.S., Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Chair of Advisory Committee: Dr. Jaime Grunlan Layer-by-layer (LbL) assembly has proven to be a powerful technique for assembling thin films with a variety of properties including electrochromic, molecular sensing, oxygen barrier, and antimicrobial. LbL involves the deposition of alternating cationic and anionic ingredients from solution, utilizing the electrostatic charges to develop multilayer films. The present work incorporates cationic antimicrobial agents into the positively-charged layers of LbL assemblies. When these thin films are exposed to a humid environment, the antimicrobial molecules readily diffuse out and prevent bacterial growth. The influence of exposure time, testing temperature, secondary ingredients and number of bilayers on antimicrobial efficacy is evaluated here. Additionally, film growth and microstructure are analyzed to better understand the behavior of these films.
    [Show full text]
  • Sofosbuvir-Based and Elbasvir/Grazoprevir Treatment Fai
    Sofosbuvir-Based and Elbasvir/Grazoprevir Treatment Fai... From www.HCVGuidance.org on September 27, 2021 Sofosbuvir-Based and Elbasvir/Grazoprevir Treatment Failures In general, persons who have experienced treatment failure with a sofosbuvir-based regimen should be retreated with 12 weeks of sofosbuvir/velpatasvir/voxilaprevir. The main exception is persons with genotype 3 and cirrhosis, in whom addition of ribavirin to sofosbuvir/velpatasvir/voxilaprevir for 12 weeks is recommended. Sixteen weeks of glecaprevir/pibrentasvir is an alternative regimen. Elbasvir/grazoprevir treatment failure patients should also be retreated with 12 weeks of sofosbuvir/velpatasvir/voxilaprevir. However, glecaprevir/pibrentasvir for 16 weeks is not recommended as an alternative for this group of patients. Recommended and alternative regimens listed by evidence level and alphabetically for: Sofosbuvir-Based Treatment Failures, With or Without Compensated Cirrhosisa RECOMMENDED DURATION RATING Daily fixed-dose combination of sofosbuvir (400 mg)/velpatasvir (100 12 weeks I, A mg)/voxilaprevir (100 mg)b ALTERNATIVE DURATION RATING Daily fixed-dose combination of glecaprevir (300 mg)/pibrentasvir (120 mg) 16 weeks I, A except for NS3/4 protease inhibitor inclusive combination DAA regimen failuresc Not recommended for genotype 3 infection with sofosbuvir/NS5A inhibitor experience. a For decompensated cirrhosis, please refer to the appropriate section. b Genotype 3: Add weight-based ribavirin if cirrhosis is present and there are no contraindications. c This regimen is not recommended for patients with prior exposure to an NS5A inhibitor plus NS3/4 PI regimens (eg. Elbasvir/grazoprevir). Recommended Regimen Sofosbuvir/Velpatasvir/Voxilaprevir The placebo-controlled, phase 3 POLARIS-1 trial evaluated a 12-week course of the daily fixed-dose combination of sofosbuvir (400 mg)/velpatasvir (100 mg)/voxilaprevir (100mg) in 263 persons with a prior NS5A inhibitor-containing DAA regimen failure.
    [Show full text]
  • Reseptregisteret 2013–2017 the Norwegian Prescription Database
    LEGEMIDDELSTATISTIKK 2018:2 Reseptregisteret 2013–2017 Tema: Legemidler og eldre The Norwegian Prescription Database 2013–2017 Topic: Drug use in the elderly Reseptregisteret 2013–2017 Tema: Legemidler og eldre The Norwegian Prescription Database 2013–2017 Topic: Drug use in the elderly Christian Berg Hege Salvesen Blix Olaug Fenne Kari Furu Vidar Hjellvik Kari Jansdotter Husabø Irene Litleskare Marit Rønning Solveig Sakshaug Randi Selmer Anne-Johanne Søgaard Sissel Torheim Utgitt av Folkehelseinstituttet/Published by Norwegian Institute of Public Health Område for Helsedata og digitalisering Avdeling for Legemiddelstatistikk Juni 2018 Tittel/Title: Legemiddelstatistikk 2018:2 Reseptregisteret 2013–2017 / The Norwegian Prescription Database 2013–2017 Forfattere/Authors: Christian Berg, redaktør/editor Hege Salvesen Blix Olaug Fenne Kari Furu Vidar Hjellvik Kari Jansdotter Husabø Irene Litleskare Marit Rønning Solveig Sakshaug Randi Selmer Anne-Johanne Søgaard Sissel Torheim Acknowledgement: Julie D. W. Johansen (English text) Bestilling/Order: Rapporten kan lastes ned som pdf på Folkehelseinstituttets nettsider: www.fhi.no The report can be downloaded from www.fhi.no Grafisk design omslag: Fete Typer Ombrekking: Houston911 Kontaktinformasjon/Contact information: Folkehelseinstituttet/Norwegian Institute of Public Health Postboks 222 Skøyen N-0213 Oslo Tel: +47 21 07 70 00 ISSN: 1890-9647 ISBN: 978-82-8082-926-9 Sitering/Citation: Berg, C (red), Reseptregisteret 2013–2017 [The Norwegian Prescription Database 2013–2017] Legemiddelstatistikk 2018:2, Oslo, Norge: Folkehelseinstituttet, 2018. Tidligere utgaver / Previous editions: 2008: Reseptregisteret 2004–2007 / The Norwegian Prescription Database 2004–2007 2009: Legemiddelstatistikk 2009:2: Reseptregisteret 2004–2008 / The Norwegian Prescription Database 2004–2008 2010: Legemiddelstatistikk 2010:2: Reseptregisteret 2005–2009. Tema: Vanedannende legemidler / The Norwegian Prescription Database 2005–2009.
    [Show full text]
  • Being Aware of Chlorhexidine Allergy
    Being aware of chlorhexidine allergy If you have an immediate allergic reaction to chlorhexidine you may experience symptoms such as: x itching x skin rash (hives) x swelling x anaphylaxis. People who develop anaphylaxis to chlorhexidine may have experienced mild reactions, such as skin rash, to chlorhexidine before. Irritant contact dermatitis or allergic contact dermatitis Chlorhexidine can also cause irritant dermatitis. This is not a true allergic reaction. It is caused by chlorhexidine directly irritating skin and results in rough, dry and scaly Chlorhexidine is an antiseptic. Allergic reactions to skin, sometimes with weeping sores. chlorhexidine are rare but are becoming more common. Chlorhexidine is used in many products both in Chlorhexidine can also cause allergic contact hospitals and in the community. dermatitis. Symptoms look like irritant dermatitis, but the cause of the symptoms is delayed by 12-48 hours Why have I been given this factsheet? after contact with chlorhexidine. You have been given this brochure because you have had a reaction to a medication, a medical dressing Both irritant dermatitis and allergic contact dermatitis or antiseptic. This may or may not be caused by a caused by chlorhexidine are annoying but not chlorhexidine allergy. dangerous. It is important that you are aware of the possibility of an It is recommended that you avoid chlorhexidine if you allergy. experience these responses as some people have gone on to develop immediate allergic reaction to chlorhexidine. Allergic reactions to chlorhexidine Severe allergic reactions to chlorhexidine are rare, but How do I know which products contain they can be serious. Immediate allergic reactions can chlorhexidine? cause anaphlaxis (a very severe allergic reaction which can be life-threatening).
    [Show full text]
  • Determining Ribavirin's Mechanism of Action Against Lassa Virus Infection
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Determining Ribavirin’s mechanism of action against Lassa virus infection Received: 28 March 2017 Paola Carrillo-Bustamante1, Thi Huyen Tram Nguyen2,3, Lisa Oestereich4,5, Stephan Accepted: 4 August 2017 Günther4,5, Jeremie Guedj 2,3 & Frederik Graw1 Published: xx xx xxxx Ribavirin is a broad spectrum antiviral which inhibits Lassa virus (LASV) replication in vitro but exhibits a minor effect on viremiain vivo. However, ribavirin significantly improves the disease outcome when administered in combination with sub-optimal doses of favipiravir, a strong antiviral drug. The mechanisms explaining these conflicting findings have not been determined, so far. Here, we used an interdisciplinary approach combining mathematical models and experimental data in LASV-infected mice that were treated with ribavirin alone or in combination with the drug favipiravir to explore different putative mechanisms of action for ribavirin. We test four different hypotheses that have been previously suggested for ribavirin’s mode of action: (i) acting as a mutagen, thereby limiting the infectivity of new virions; (ii) reducing viremia by impairing viral production; (iii) modulating cell damage, i.e., by reducing inflammation, and (iv) enhancing antiviral immunity. Our analysis indicates that enhancement of antiviral immunity, as well as effects on viral production or transmission are unlikely to be ribavirin’s main mechanism mediating its antiviral effectiveness against LASV infection. Instead, the modeled viral kinetics suggest that the main mode of action of ribavirin is to protect infected cells from dying, possibly reducing the inflammatory response. Lassa fever (LF) is a severe and often fatal hemorrhagic disease caused by Lassa virus (LASV), a member of the Arenaviridae virus family.
    [Show full text]
  • Lethal Mutagenesis of Hepatitis C Virus Induced by Favipiravir
    RESEARCH ARTICLE Lethal Mutagenesis of Hepatitis C Virus Induced by Favipiravir Ana I. de AÂ vila1, Isabel Gallego1,2, Maria Eugenia Soria3, Josep Gregori2,3,4, Josep Quer2,3,5, Juan Ignacio Esteban2,3,5, Charles M. Rice6, Esteban Domingo1,2*, Celia Perales1,2,3* 1 Centro de BiologõÂa Molecular ªSevero Ochoaº (CSIC-UAM), Consejo Superior de Investigaciones CientõÂficas (CSIC), Campus de Cantoblanco, 28049, Madrid, Spain, 2 Centro de InvestigacioÂn BiomeÂdica en Red de Enfermedades HepaÂticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd), Barcelona, Spain, 3 Liver Unit, Internal Medicine, Laboratory of Malalties Hepàtiques, Vall d'Hebron Institut de Recerca-Hospital Universitari Vall d a11111 ÂHebron, (VHIR-HUVH), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08035, Barcelona, Spain, 4 Roche Diagnostics, S.L., Sant Cugat del ValleÂs, Spain, 5 Universitat AutoÂnoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain, 6 Center for the Study of Hepatitis C, Laboratory of Virology and Infectious Disease, The Rockefeller University, New York, United States of America * [email protected] (ED); [email protected] (CP) OPEN ACCESS Abstract Citation: de AÂvila AI, Gallego I, Soria ME, Gregori J, Quer J, Esteban JI, et al. (2016) Lethal Lethal mutagenesis is an antiviral approach that consists in extinguishing a virus by an Mutagenesis of Hepatitis C Virus Induced by excess of mutations acquired during replication in the presence of a mutagen. Here we Favipiravir. PLoS ONE 11(10): e0164691. show that favipiravir (T-705) is a potent mutagenic agent for hepatitis C virus (HCV) during doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0164691 its replication in human hepatoma cells. T-705 leads to an excess of G ! A and C ! U tran- Editor: Ming-Lung Yu, Kaohsiung Medical sitions in the mutant spectrum of preextinction HCV populations.
    [Show full text]
  • Elbasvir/Grazoprevir for Hepatitis C Virus Genotype 1B East-Asian Patients Receiving Hemodialysis
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Elbasvir/grazoprevir for hepatitis C virus genotype 1b East-Asian patients receiving hemodialysis Chen-Hua Liu 1,2,3, Cheng-Yuan Peng 4,5, Yu-Jen Fang3, Wei-Yu Kao 6,7,8, Sheng-Shun Yang9,10,11,12,13, Cheng-Kuan Lin14, Hsueh-Chou Lai4,5, Wen-Pang Su5, Sheng-Uei Fang6,7, Chun-Chao Chang6,7,8, Tung-Hung Su 1,2, Chun-Jen Liu 1,2, Pei-Jer Chen1,2,15, Ding-Shinn Chen1,2,16 & Jia-Horng Kao 1,2,15 ✉ Data regarding the efcacy and tolerability of elbasvir/grazoprevir (EBR/GZR) for East-Asian hepatitis C virus genotype 1b (HCV GT1b) patients receiving hemodialysis were limited. We prospectively recruited 40 HCV GT1b hemodialysis patients who received EBR/GZR for 12 weeks at 6 academic centers in Taiwan. The efcacy endpoints were sustained virologic response 12 weeks of-therapy (SVR12) by intention-to-treat (ITT) modifed ITT (mITT) analyses. Patients’ baseline characteristics, early viral kinetics and HCV resistance-associated substitutions (RASs) at HCV non-structural 3 and 5 A (NS3 and NS5A) regions potentially afecting SVR12 were analyzed. The tolerability for EBR/GZR was also assessed. The SVR12 rates by ITT and mITT analyses were 95% (38 of 40 patients; 95% confdence interval (CI): 83.5–98.6%) and 100% (38 of 38 patients; 95% CI: 90.8–100%), respectively. Patients’ baseline characteristics, on-treatment viral decline, and baseline HCV RASs did not afect SVR12. All patients tolerated treatment well. Among 5 patients who had serious adverse events (AEs) including one death due to on-treatment suicide and the other death due to of-therapy acute myocardial infarction, none of these events were judged related to EBR/GZR.
    [Show full text]
  • National OTC Medicines List
    National OTC Medicines List ‐ DraŌ 01 DRAFT National OTC Medicines List Draft 01 Ministry of Public Health of Lebanon This list was prepared under the guidance of His Excellency Minister Waêl Abou Faour andDRAFT the supervision of the Director General Dr. Walid Ammar. Editors Rita KARAM, Pharm D. PhD. Myriam WATFA, Pharm D Ghassan HAMADEH, MD.CPE FOREWORD According to the French National Agency for Medicines and Health Products Safety (ANSM), Over-the-counter (OTC) drugs are medicines that are accessible to patients in pharmacies, based on criteria set to safeguard patients’ safety. Due to their therapeutic class, these medicines could be dispensed without physician’s intervention for diagnostic, treatment initiation or maintenance purposes. Moreover, their dosage, treatment period and Package Insert Leaflet should be suitable for OTC classification. The packaging size should be in accordance with the dosage and treatment period. According to ArticleDRAFT 43 of the Law No.367 issued in 1994 related to the pharmacy practice, and the amendment of Articles 46 and 47 by Law No.91 issued in 2010, pharmacists do not have the right to dispense any medicine that is not requested by a unified prescription, unless the medicine is mentioned in a list which is established by pharmacists and physicians’ syndicates. In this regard, the Ministry of Public Health (MoPH) developed the National OTC Medicines List, and presentedit in a scientific, objective, reliable, and accessible listing. The OTC List was developed by a team of pharmacists and physicians from the Ministry of Public Health (MoPH). In order to ensure a safe and effective self- medicationat the pharmacy level, several pharmaceutical categories (e.g.
    [Show full text]