DOCSLIB.ORG

How Shear and Moment Work?

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
How Shear and Moment Work? How Shear and Moment Work? Beams are in every home and in one sense are quite simple. The weight placed on them causes them to bend, and you just need to choose a large enough beam to withstand it. As shown in the diagram below, when bending, the top portion is resisting a desire to shorten while the bottom portion is resisting a desire to lengthen. So how do we make sense of what is happening inside the beam deeply enough to quantify it and choose the right beam? After all you cannot wait until the house is built to find out the beam is too small. Solution to How Shear and Moment Work: There are 2 basic forces at play to consider, bending and shear. Bending is happening due to the beams desire to crack in the middle under load, both halves rotating inward. Engineers call this desire to bend, moment. The integrity of the wood fibers resist the crushing force on the top half of the beam and the separating force on the bottom half of the beam. Shear is simply the vertical weight on a beam at any given point. Let’s consider an interesting example where a 12’ beam is supporting a continuous load that increases from 0 lbs/ft on the left to 24 lbs/ft on the right such as a rake wall would produce. Wall load is typically considered to be 8lbs/ft2 as it is composed of wood and drywall. Engineers would show this continuous load with a multitude of forces acting downward on the beam. In order for the post to support the beam at A we need to know how much weight the beam would put on it. Moment = force x distance … but a continuous load has infinitely many forces? Thanks to calculus, which makes short work of infinity, and the mathematics of the center of mass, we can consider the whole weight on the beam to act at a distance 2/3 of the way across the beam from the left (since this is a triangular load). We don’t want the beam to rotate so the sum of the moments should be 0. The total weight on the beam is: (1) 24 lbs/ft * 12 ft * ½ = 144 lbs … (as a result of the area of triangle formula) and it acts at a point 8’ from A. Moment around A: (1) MA = FB*12 - 144*8 = 0 … and solving for FB we get 96 lbs. Moment around B: (2) MB = FA*12 - 144*4 = 0 … and solving for FA we get 48 lbs. Now on the beautiful mathematics of shear and moment. For a beam to resist shear and bending away from the supports we have to make a cut some distance in and consider the internal forces on the beam. Shear: If we measure in a distance (x) and consider the vertical forces, again they must sum to 0 if the beam is going to remain in equilibrium (aka not move). Notice the forces of the posts upward add up to the 144 lbs of weight on the beam. Notice the 12’ beam has a force of 24 lbs/ft at its end. This is twice its length, so if our cut is at x then the weight at the cut would be 2x lbs/ft. Notice also that the fibers of the beam will have to be capable of resisting the shear force at the cut labeled V in the diagram. As before the total weight on the beam is found with the area of the triangle formula, and we can now find a formula for V based on the location of the cut x. (3) 48 – 2x*x*1/2 - V = 0 … and solving for V we have V = 48 – x2 measured in lbs … a lovely parabola. Notice that this would indicate there is no shear strength required of the beam when x ≈ 6.93 ft. Notice also that the maximum shear strength required of the beam is 96 lbs (which not coincidentally matches the force we found the post exerts at B. The versa-lam design table from Boise Cascade at the end of this document, lists the allowable shear strength of different beam designs. We now have one force on a beam figured out and a rough idea of how to find a beam capable of resisting it. Now let’s move on to the second … moment. Moment: Now we reconsider our section of the beam and consider the internal moment the beam will have to resist based on its fiber strength to keep the beam from actually cracking at the distance x. As before, the sum of the moments in our section has to be 0 to maintain equilibrium. The M in the figure is the moment around the cut that the beam will have to be capable of producing to counteract the rotation the weight and the post want to cause. Moment around the cut: ퟏ ퟑ (4) MC = M + 2x*x*1/2 * 1/3*x – 48x = 0 and solving for M we have 푴 = ퟒퟖ풙 − 풙 … measured in ft-lbs. ퟑ Notice this indicates the maximum moment of 222 ft-lbs occurs when x = 6.93 ft … which coincides with the location of minimum shear. Now for the really beautiful part. The units on the shear diagram would indicate that the shaded area would have a unit in ft-lbs. And sure enough the integral of the shear formula: 푽 = ퟒퟖ − 풙ퟐ Matches exactly the formula we found for the moment: ퟏ 푴 = ퟒퟖ풙 − 풙ퟑ ퟑ The versa-lam design table from Boise Cascade at the end of this document, also lists the allowable moment for different beam designs. So there you have it. Calculate the maximum shear and moment that a beam will have to bear based on the forces that are on it and look in the table to find a beam capable of resisting them. .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Experimental Determination of the Moment of Inertia of a Model Airplane Michael Koken [email protected]
    The University of Akron IdeaExchange@UAkron The Dr. Gary B. and Pamela S. Williams Honors Honors Research Projects College Fall 2017 The Experimental Determination of the Moment of Inertia of a Model Airplane Michael Koken [email protected] Please take a moment to share how this work helps you through this survey. Your feedback will be important as we plan further development of our repository. Follow this and additional works at: http://ideaexchange.uakron.edu/honors_research_projects Part of the Aerospace Engineering Commons, Aviation Commons, Civil and Environmental Engineering Commons, Mechanical Engineering Commons, and the Physics Commons Recommended Citation Koken, Michael, "The Experimental Determination of the Moment of Inertia of a Model Airplane" (2017). Honors Research Projects. 585. http://ideaexchange.uakron.edu/honors_research_projects/585 This Honors Research Project is brought to you for free and open access by The Dr. Gary B. and Pamela S. Williams Honors College at IdeaExchange@UAkron, the institutional repository of The nivU ersity of Akron in Akron, Ohio, USA. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors Research Projects by an authorized administrator of IdeaExchange@UAkron. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. 2017 THE EXPERIMENTAL DETERMINATION OF A MODEL AIRPLANE KOKEN, MICHAEL THE UNIVERSITY OF AKRON Honors Project TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Tables ................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Rotational Motion (The Dynamics of a Rigid Body)
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Robert Katz Publications Research Papers in Physics and Astronomy 1-1958 Physics, Chapter 11: Rotational Motion (The Dynamics of a Rigid Body) Henry Semat City College of New York Robert Katz University of Nebraska-Lincoln, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/physicskatz Part of the Physics Commons Semat, Henry and Katz, Robert, "Physics, Chapter 11: Rotational Motion (The Dynamics of a Rigid Body)" (1958). Robert Katz Publications. 141. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/physicskatz/141 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Research Papers in Physics and Astronomy at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Robert Katz Publications by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. 11 Rotational Motion (The Dynamics of a Rigid Body) 11-1 Motion about a Fixed Axis The motion of the flywheel of an engine and of a pulley on its axle are examples of an important type of motion of a rigid body, that of the motion of rotation about a fixed axis. Consider the motion of a uniform disk rotat­ ing about a fixed axis passing through its center of gravity C perpendicular to the face of the disk, as shown in Figure 11-1. The motion of this disk may be de­ scribed in terms of the motions of each of its individual particles, but a better way to describe the motion is in terms of the angle through which the disk rotates.
    [Show full text]
  • Pierre Simon Laplace - Biography Paper
    Pierre Simon Laplace - Biography Paper MATH 4010 Melissa R. Moore University of Colorado- Denver April 1, 2008 2 Many people contributed to the scientific fields of mathematics, physics, chemistry and astronomy. According to Gillispie (1997), Pierre Simon Laplace was the most influential scientist in all history, (p.vii). Laplace helped form the modern scientific disciplines. His techniques are used diligently by engineers, mathematicians and physicists. His diverse collection of work ranged in all fields but began in mathematics. Laplace was born in Normandy in 1749. His father, Pierre, was a syndic of a parish and his mother, Marie-Anne, was from a family of farmers. Many accounts refer to Laplace as a peasant. While it was not exactly known the profession of his Uncle Louis, priest, mathematician or teacher, speculations implied he was an educated man. In 1756, Laplace enrolled at the Beaumont-en-Auge, a secondary school run the Benedictine order. He studied there until the age of sixteen. The nest step of education led to either the army or the church. His father intended him for ecclesiastical vocation, according to Gillispie (1997 p.3). In 1766, Laplace went to the University of Caen to begin preparation for a career in the church, according to Katz (1998 p.609). Cristophe Gadbled and Pierre Le Canu taught Laplace mathematics, which in turn showed him his talents. In 1768, Laplace left for Paris to pursue mathematics further. Le Canu gave Laplace a letter of recommendation to d’Alembert, according to Gillispie (1997 p.3). Allegedly d’Alembert gave Laplace a problem which he solved immediately.
    [Show full text]
  • Magnetism, Angular Momentum, and Spin
    Chapter 19 Magnetism, Angular Momentum, and Spin P. J. Grandinetti Chem. 4300 P. J. Grandinetti Chapter 19: Magnetism, Angular Momentum, and Spin In 1820 Hans Christian Ørsted discovered that electric current produces a magnetic field that deflects compass needle from magnetic north, establishing first direct connection between fields of electricity and magnetism. P. J. Grandinetti Chapter 19: Magnetism, Angular Momentum, and Spin Biot-Savart Law Jean-Baptiste Biot and Félix Savart worked out that magnetic field, B⃗, produced at distance r away from section of wire of length dl carrying steady current I is 휇 I d⃗l × ⃗r dB⃗ = 0 Biot-Savart law 4휋 r3 Direction of magnetic field vector is given by “right-hand” rule: if you point thumb of your right hand along direction of current then your fingers will curl in direction of magnetic field. current P. J. Grandinetti Chapter 19: Magnetism, Angular Momentum, and Spin Microscopic Origins of Magnetism Shortly after Biot and Savart, Ampére suggested that magnetism in matter arises from a multitude of ring currents circulating at atomic and molecular scale. André-Marie Ampére 1775 - 1836 P. J. Grandinetti Chapter 19: Magnetism, Angular Momentum, and Spin Magnetic dipole moment from current loop Current flowing in flat loop of wire with area A will generate magnetic field magnetic which, at distance much larger than radius, r, appears identical to field dipole produced by point magnetic dipole with strength of radius 휇 = | ⃗휇| = I ⋅ A current Example What is magnetic dipole moment induced by e* in circular orbit of radius r with linear velocity v? * 휋 Solution: For e with linear velocity of v the time for one orbit is torbit = 2 r_v.
    [Show full text]
  • DEFINITIONS Beams and Stringers (B&S) Beams and Stringers Are
    DEFINITIONS Beams and Stringers (B&S) Beams and stringers are primary longitudinal support members, usually rectangular pieces that are 5.0 or more in. thick, with a depth more than 2.0 in. greater than the thickness. B&S are graded primarily for use as beams, with loads applied to the narrow face. Bent. A type of pier consisting of two or more columns or column-like components connected at their top ends by a cap, strut, or other component holding them in their correct positions. Camber. The convex curvature of a beam, typically used in glulam beams. Cantilever. A horizontal member fixed at one end and free at the other. Cap. A sawn lumber or glulam component placed horizontally on an abutment or pier to distribute the live load and dead load of the superstructure. Clear Span. Inside distance between the faces of support. Connector. Synonym for fastener. Crib. A structure consisting of a foundation grillage and a framework providing compartments that are filled with gravel, stones, or other material satisfactory for supporting the structure to be placed thereon. Check. A lengthwise separation of the wood that usually extends across the rings of annual growth and commonly results from stresses set up in wood during seasoning. Creep. Time dependent deformation of a wood member under sustained load. Dead Load. The structure’s self weight. Decay. The decomposition of wood substance by fungi. Some people refer to it as “rot”. Decking. A subcategory of dimension lumber, graded primarily for use with the wide face placed flatwise. Delamination. The separation of layers in laminated wood or plywood because of failure of the adhesive, either within the adhesive itself or at the interface between the adhesive and the adhered.
    [Show full text]
  • Beam Structures and Internal Forces
    ENDS 231 Note Set 13 S2008abn Beam Structures and Internal Forces • BEAMS - Important type of structural members (floors, bridges, roofs) - Usually long, straight and rectangular - Have loads that are usually perpendicular applied at points along the length Internal Forces 2 • Internal forces are those that hold the parts of the member together for equilibrium - Truss members: F A B F F A F′ F′ B F - For any member: T´ F = internal axial force (perpendicular to cut across section) V = internal shear force T´ (parallel to cut across section) T M = internal bending moment V Support Conditions & Loading V • Most often loads are perpendicular to the beam and cause only internal shear forces and bending moments M • Knowing the internal forces and moments is necessary when R designing beam size & shape to resist those loads • Types of loads - Concentrated – single load, single moment - Distributed – loading spread over a distance, uniform or non-uniform. 1 ENDS 231 Note Set 13 S2008abn • Types of supports - Statically determinate: simply supported, cantilever, overhang L (number of unknowns < number of equilibrium equations) Propped - Statically indeterminate: continuous, fixed-roller, fixed-fixed (number of unknowns < number of equilibrium equations) L Sign Conventions for Internal Shear and Bending Moment Restrained (different from statics and truss members!) V When ∑Fy **excluding V** on the left hand side (LHS) section is positive, V will direct down and is considered POSITIVE. M When ∑M **excluding M** about the cut on the left hand side (LHS) section causes a smile which could hold water (curl upward), M will be counter clockwise (+) and is considered POSITIVE.
    [Show full text]
  • A Simple Beam Test: Motivating High School Teachers to Develop Pre-Engineering Curricula
    Session 2326 A Simple Beam Test: Motivating High School Teachers to Develop Pre-Engineering Curricula Eric E. Matsumoto, John R. Johnston, E. Edward Dammel, S.K. Ramesh California State University, Sacramento Abstract The College of Engineering and Computer Science at California State University, Sacramento has developed a daylong workshop for high school teachers interested in developing and teaching pre-engineering curricula. Recent workshop participants from nine high schools performed “hands-on” laboratory experiments that can be implemented at the high school level to introduce basic engineering principles and technology and to inspire students to study engineering. This paper describes one experiment that introduces fundamental structural engineering concepts through a simple beam test. A load is applied at the center of a beam using weights, and the resulting midspan deflection is measured. The elastic stiffness of the beam is determined and compared to published values for various beam materials and cross sectional shapes. Beams can also be tested to failure. This simple and inexpensive experiment provides a useful springboard for discussion of important engineering topics such as elastic and inelastic behavior, influence of materials and structural shapes, stiffness, strength, and failure modes. Background engineering concepts are also introduced to help high school teachers understand and implement the experiment. Participants rated the workshop highly and several teachers have already implemented workshop experiments in pre-engineering curricula. I. Introduction The College of Engineering and Computer Science at California State University, Sacramento has developed an active outreach program to attract students to the College and promote engineering education. In partnership with the Sacramento Engineering and Technology Regional Consortium1 (SETRC), the College has developed a daylong workshop for high school teachers interested in developing and teaching pre-engineering curricula.
    [Show full text]
  • I-Beam Cantilever Racks Meet the Latest Addition to Our Quick Ship Line
    48 HOUR QUICK SHIP Maximize storage and improve accessibility I-Beam cantilever racks Meet the latest addition to our Quick Ship line. Popular for their space-saving design, I-Beam cantilever racks can allow accessibility from both sides, allowing for faster load and unload times. Their robust construction reduces fork truck damage. Quick Ship I-beam cantilever racks offer: • 4‘ arm length, with 4” vertical adjustability • Freestanding heights of 12’ and 16’ • Structural steel construction with a 50,000 psi minimum yield • Heavy arm connector plate • Bolted base-to-column connection I-Beam Cantilever Racks can be built in either single- or double-sided configurations. How to design your cantilever rack systems 1. Determine the number and spacing of support arms. 1a The capacity of each 4’ arm is 2,600#, so you will need to make sure that you 1b use enough arms to accommodate your load. In addition, you can test for deflection by using wood blocks on the floor under the load. 1c Use enough arms under a load to prevent deflection of the load. Deflection causes undesirable side pressure on the arms. If you do not detect any deflection with two wood blocks, you may use two support arms. Note: Product should overhang the end of the rack by 1/2 of the upright centerline distance. If you notice deflection, try three supports. Add supports as necessary until deflection is eliminated. Loading without overhang is incorrect. I-Beam cantilever racks WWW.STEELKING.COM 2. Determine if Quick Ship I-Beam arm length is appropriate for your load.
    [Show full text]
  • Finite Element Model Calibration of an Instrumented Thirteen-Story Steel Moment Frame Building in South San Fernando Valley, California
    Finite Element Model Calibration of An Instrumented Thirteen-story Steel Moment Frame Building in South San Fernando Valley, California By Erol Kalkan Disclamer The finite element model incuding its executable file are provided by the copyright holder "as is" and any express or implied warranties, including, but not limited to, the implied warranties of merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose are disclaimed. In no event shall the copyright owner be liable for any direct, indirect, incidental, special, exemplary, or consequential damages (including, but not limited to, procurement of substitute goods or services; loss of use, data, or profits; or business interruption) however caused and on any theory of liability, whether in contract, strict liability, or tort (including negligence or otherwise) arising in any way out of the use of this software, even if advised of the possibility of such damage. Acknowledgments Ground motions were recorded at a station owned and maintained by the California Geological Survey (CGS). Data can be downloaded from CESMD Virtual Data Center at: http://www.strongmotioncenter.org/cgi-bin/CESMD/StaEvent.pl?stacode=CE24567. Contents Introduction ..................................................................................................................................................... 1 OpenSEES Model ........................................................................................................................................... 3 Calibration of OpenSEES Model to Observed Response
    [Show full text]
  • Moment of Inertia
    MOMENT OF INERTIA The moment of inertia, also known as the mass moment of inertia, angular mass or rotational inertia, of a rigid body is a quantity that determines the torque needed for a desired angular acceleration about a rotational axis; similar to how mass determines the force needed for a desired acceleration. It depends on the body's mass distribution and the axis chosen, with larger moments requiring more torque to change the body's rotation rate. It is an extensive (additive) property: for a point mass the moment of inertia is simply the mass times the square of the perpendicular distance to the rotation axis. The moment of inertia of a rigid composite system is the sum of the moments of inertia of its component subsystems (all taken about the same axis). Its simplest definition is the second moment of mass with respect to distance from an axis. For bodies constrained to rotate in a plane, only their moment of inertia about an axis perpendicular to the plane, a scalar value, and matters. For bodies free to rotate in three dimensions, their moments can be described by a symmetric 3 × 3 matrix, with a set of mutually perpendicular principal axes for which this matrix is diagonal and torques around the axes act independently of each other. When a body is free to rotate around an axis, torque must be applied to change its angular momentum. The amount of torque needed to cause any given angular acceleration (the rate of change in angular velocity) is proportional to the moment of inertia of the body.
    [Show full text]
  • Angular Momentum and Magnetic Moment
    Angular momentum and magnetic moment Introduction to Nuclear Science Simon Fraser University Spring 2011 NUCS 342 | January 12, 2011 NUCS 342 (Lecture 1) January 12, 2011 1 / 27 2 Conservation laws 3 Scalar and vector product 4 Rotational motion 5 Magnetic moment 6 Angular momentum in quantum mechanics 7 Spin Outline 1 Scalars and vectors NUCS 342 (Lecture 1) January 12, 2011 2 / 27 3 Scalar and vector product 4 Rotational motion 5 Magnetic moment 6 Angular momentum in quantum mechanics 7 Spin Outline 1 Scalars and vectors 2 Conservation laws NUCS 342 (Lecture 1) January 12, 2011 2 / 27 4 Rotational motion 5 Magnetic moment 6 Angular momentum in quantum mechanics 7 Spin Outline 1 Scalars and vectors 2 Conservation laws 3 Scalar and vector product NUCS 342 (Lecture 1) January 12, 2011 2 / 27 5 Magnetic moment 6 Angular momentum in quantum mechanics 7 Spin Outline 1 Scalars and vectors 2 Conservation laws 3 Scalar and vector product 4 Rotational motion NUCS 342 (Lecture 1) January 12, 2011 2 / 27 6 Angular momentum in quantum mechanics 7 Spin Outline 1 Scalars and vectors 2 Conservation laws 3 Scalar and vector product 4 Rotational motion 5 Magnetic moment NUCS 342 (Lecture 1) January 12, 2011 2 / 27 7 Spin Outline 1 Scalars and vectors 2 Conservation laws 3 Scalar and vector product 4 Rotational motion 5 Magnetic moment 6 Angular momentum in quantum mechanics NUCS 342 (Lecture 1) January 12, 2011 2 / 27 Outline 1 Scalars and vectors 2 Conservation laws 3 Scalar and vector product 4 Rotational motion 5 Magnetic moment 6 Angular momentum in quantum mechanics 7 Spin NUCS 342 (Lecture 1) January 12, 2011 2 / 27 Scalars and vectors Scalars Scalars are used to describe objects which are fully characterized by their magnitude (a number and a unit).
    [Show full text]
  • Rotation: Moment of Inertia and Torque
    Rotation: Moment of Inertia and Torque Every time we push a door open or tighten a bolt using a wrench, we apply a force that results in a rotational motion about a fixed axis. Through experience we learn that where the force is applied and how the force is applied is just as important as how much force is applied when we want to make something rotate. This tutorial discusses the dynamics of an object rotating about a fixed axis and introduces the concepts of torque and moment of inertia. These concepts allows us to get a better understanding of why pushing a door towards its hinges is not very a very effective way to make it open, why using a longer wrench makes it easier to loosen a tight bolt, etc. This module begins by looking at the kinetic energy of rotation and by defining a quantity known as the moment of inertia which is the rotational analog of mass. Then it proceeds to discuss the quantity called torque which is the rotational analog of force and is the physical quantity that is required to changed an object's state of rotational motion. Moment of Inertia Kinetic Energy of Rotation Consider a rigid object rotating about a fixed axis at a certain angular velocity. Since every particle in the object is moving, every particle has kinetic energy. To find the total kinetic energy related to the rotation of the body, the sum of the kinetic energy of every particle due to the rotational motion is taken. The total kinetic energy can be expressed as ..
    [Show full text]