Gravity Equations: Workhorse, Toolkit and Cookbook

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Gravity Equations: Workhorse, Toolkit and Cookbook No 2013 – 27 September CENTRE D’ÉTUDESPROSPECTIVES ETD’INFORMATIONS INTERNATIONALES DOCUMENTDETRAVAIL Gravity Equations: Workhorse,Toolkit, and Cookbook Keith Head and Thierry Mayer CEPII Working Paper Gravity Equations: Workhorse,Toolkit, and Cookbook TABLE OF CONTENTS Highlights and Abstract...........................3 Points clefs et résumé............................4 1. Introduction..............................6 1.1. Gravity features of trade data.....................6 1.2. A brief history of gravity in trade....................8 2. Microfoundations for Gravity Equations................... 11 2.1. Three Definitions of the Gravity Equation................ 11 2.2. Assumptions underlying structural gravity................ 13 2.3. Main variants of gravity for trade.................... 14 2.4. Gravity models beyond trade in goods.................. 23 3. Theory-consistent estimation....................... 23 3.1. Proxies for multilateral resistance terms................. 24 3.2. Iterative structural estimation..................... 24 3.3. Fixed effects estimation........................ 25 3.4. Ratio-type estimation........................ 26 3.5. Other methods........................... 27 3.6. Monte Carlo study of alternative estimators................ 28 3.7. Identification and estimation of country-specific effects........... 31 4. Gravity estimates of policy impacts..................... 33 4.1. Meta-analysis of policy dummies.................... 33 4.2. The elasticity of trade with respect to trade costs.............. 36 4.3. Partial vs general equilibrium impacts on trade.............. 39 4.4. Testing structural gravity....................... 44 5. Frontiers of gravity research....................... 45 5.1. Gravity’s errors........................... 46 5.2. Causes and consequences of zeros................... 50 5.3. Firm-level gravity, extensive and intensive margins............. 56 6. Directions for future research....................... 62 7. Conclusions.............................. 63 References................................ 63 2 CEPII Working Paper Gravity Equations: Workhorse,Toolkit, and Cookbook GRAVITY EQUATIONS: WORKHORSE,TOOLKIT, AND COOKBOOK Keith Head and Thierry Mayer HIGHLIGHTS We review the microfoundations of gravity equations We review the theory-consistent methods of estimating gravity equations We provide a literature review of the effect of certain policies, based on gravity estimates We specify some frontiers of research on gravity equations ABSTRACT This chapter focuses on the estimation and interpretation of gravity equations for bilateral trade. This necessarily involves a careful consideration of the theoretical underpinnings since it has become clear that naive approaches to estimation lead to biased and frequently misinterpreted results. There are now several theory-consistent estimation methods and we argue against sole reliance on any one method and instead advocate a toolkit approach. One estimator may be preferred for certain types of data or research questions but more often the methods should be used in concert to establish robustness. In recent years, estimation has become just a first step before a deeper analysis of the implications of the results, notably in terms of welfare. We try to facilitate diffusion of best-practice methods by illustrating their application in a step-by-step cookbook mode of exposition. JEL Classification: F10 Keywords: Gravity equations, International trade 3 CEPII Working Paper Gravity Equations: Workhorse,Toolkit, and Cookbook GRAVITY EQUATIONS: WORKHORSE,TOOLKIT, AND COOKBOOK Keith Head and Thierry Mayer POINTS CLEFS Nous exposons les différentes micro-fondations théoriques dont peuvent découler les mod- èles de gravité Nous détaillons les méthodes d’estimation conformes à la théorie Nous proposons une revue de littérature des études fondées sur des modèles de gravité et qui cherchent à mesurer l’impact de certaines politiques sur le commerce. Nous dégageons quelques frontières de la recherche sur les équations de gravité RÉSUMÉ Cet article porte sur l’usage des équations de gravité, dans le cadre général de la recherche sur le com- merce international. Nous détaillons les différentes méthodes d’estimation, ainsi que leurs interprétations possibles. En amont des estimations, nous retraçons l’évolution des fondements théoriques sur lesquels s’appuient les équations de gravité. Ces fondations théoriques n’ont été élaborées que tardivement, après avoir constaté le caractère biaisé des estimations athéoriques. Les équations de gravité reposent désor- mais sur plusieurs socles théoriques. Nous recommandons une approche plurielle plutôt qu’une approche s’appuyant sur un modèle théorique unique. Nous proposons donc une boite à outils plutôt qu’un cadre théorique figé. De manière générale, comparer les résultats issus de plusieurs méthodes nous semble être la meilleure manière d’établir la robustesse des conclusions. Il reste toutefois envisageable qu’un modèle ou un estimateur particulier s’applique mieux à une question précise ou à un type spécifique de don- nées. Ces dernières années, les équations de gravité ont trouvé un nouvel usage. Elles peuvent désormais constituer la première étape d’une étude plus approfondie portant sur les effets d’une politique donnée sur le bien-être. En résumé, nous nous proposons de diffuser les théories les plus abouties ainsi que les méthodes d’estimation qui nous semblent les meilleures. Classification JEL : F10 Mots clés : Equations de gravité, Commerce international 4 CEPII Working Paper Gravity Equations: Workhorse,Toolkit, and Cookbook GRAVITY EQUATIONS: WORKHORSE,TOOLKIT, AND COOKBOOK1 Keith Head∗ and Thierry Mayery 1This is a draft of a chapter to appear the Handbook of International Economics Vol. 4, eds. Gopinath, Helpman, and Rogoff. The chapter has a companion website, https://sites.google.com/site/hiegravity/, with an appendix, Stata code, and related links. We thank Leo Fankhänel and Camilo Umana for outstanding assistance with the programming and meta-analysis in this chapter, Soledad Zignago for great help with providing and un- derstanding subtleties of some of the data used, and Julia Jauer for her update of the gravity data. Scott Baier, Sebastian Sotelo, João Santos Silva generously provided computer code. Andres Rodríguez-Clare answered many questions we had about welfare calculations but is not responsible of course, for any mistakes we may have made. Arnaud Costinot, Gilles Duranton, Thibault Fally, Mario Larch, Marc Melitz, Gianmarco Ottaviano, and Daniel Trefler made very useful comments on previous drafts. We are especially grateful to Jose de Sousa: his careful reading identified many necessary corrections in an early draft. Participants at presentations Hitotsubashi GCOE Conference on International Trade and FDI 2012, National Bank of Belgium, Clemson University also contributed to improving the draft. Finally, we thank our discussants at the handbook conference, Rob Feenstra and Jim An- derson, for many helpful suggestions. We regret that because of limitations of time and space, we have not been able to fully respond to all of the valuable suggestions we received. This research has received funding from the European Research Council under the European Community’s Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013) Grant Agreement no. 313522. ∗Sauder School of Business, University of British Columbia and CEPR, [email protected] ySciences Po, CEPII and CEPR, [email protected] 5 CEPII Working Paper Gravity Equations: Workhorse,Toolkit, and Cookbook 1.I NTRODUCTION As the name suggests, gravity equations are a model of bilateral interactions in which size and distance effects enter multiplicatively. They have been used as a workhorse for analyzing the determinants of bilateral trade flows for 50 years since being introduced by Tinbergen(1962). Krugman(1997) referred to gravity equations as examples of “social physics,” the relatively few law-like empirical regularities that characterize social interactions.2 Over the last decade, concentrated efforts of trade theorists have established that gravity equations emerge from main- stream modeling frameworks in economics and should no longer be thought of as deriving from some murky analogy with Newtonian physics. Meanwhile empirical work—guided in varying degrees by the new theory—has proceeded to lay down a raft of stylized facts about the deter- minants of bilateral trade. As a result of recent modelling, we now know that gravity estimates can be combined with trade policy experiments to calculate implied welfare changes. This chapter focuses on the estimation and interpretation of gravity equations for bilateral trade. This necessarily involves a careful consideration of the theoretical underpinnings since it has become clear that naive approaches to estimation lead to biased and frequently misinterpreted results. There are now several theory-consistent estimation methods and we argue against sole reliance on any one method and instead advocate a toolkit approach. One estimator may be preferred for certain types of data or research questions but more often the methods should be used in concert to establish robustness. In recent years, estimation has become just a first step before a deeper analysis of the implications of the results, notably in terms of welfare. We try to facilitate diffusion of best-practice methods by illustrating their application in a step-by-step cookbook mode of exposition. 1.1. Gravity features of trade data Before considering
Recommended publications
  • Misfits in the Car Industry: Offshore Assembly Decisions at the Variety Level
    NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES MISFITS IN THE CAR INDUSTRY: OFFSHORE ASSEMBLY DECISIONS AT THE VARIETY LEVEL Keith Head Thierry Mayer Working Paper 25614 http://www.nber.org/papers/w25614 NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138 February 2019 An earlier version of this paper was prepared within the “Value Added in Motion (VAM)” project funded by the Enel Foundation. We thank an anonymous referee, participants at the 2018 TRIO Conference and seminars at LSE, Milan, National Bank of Belgium, Banque de France, and CEPII for their comments and wish to specifically acknowledge helpful suggestions from Robert Owen, Giorgio Barba Navaretti, Kerem Cosar, Peter Morrow, Peter Neary, and Gianmarco Ottaviano. This paper was written partly while Keith Head was a visitor at the Centre for Economic Performance at LSE. This research has received funding from the European Research Council (ERC) under the Grant Agreement No. 313522. The views expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Bureau of Economic Research. NBER working papers are circulated for discussion and comment purposes. They have not been peer-reviewed or been subject to the review by the NBER Board of Directors that accompanies official NBER publications. © 2019 by Keith Head and Thierry Mayer. All rights reserved. Short sections of text, not to exceed two paragraphs, may be quoted without explicit permission provided that full credit, including © notice, is given to the source. Misfits in the Car Industry: Offshore Assembly Decisions at the Variety Level Keith Head and Thierry Mayer NBER Working Paper No.
    [Show full text]
  • Gianmarco Ottaviano CV
    Curriculum Vitae Gianmarco Ireo Paolo OTTAVIANO Born in Milan (Italy) on Sept.29, 1967. Italian citizenship. Professional addresses: London School of Economics and Political Science Department of Economics and Centre for Economic Performance Houghton Street London WC2A 2AE United Kingdom E-mail: [email protected] Web: http://www.lse.ac.uk/researchAndExpertise/Experts/[email protected] CURRENT POSITIONS Professor of Economics, Department of Economics, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK. Honorary Professor of Economics (Chiamata per chiara fama), Department of Economics, Università di Bologna, Bologna, Italy. Director of the Trade Programme, Centre for Economic Performance, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK. Senior Non-Resident Fellow, Bruegel, Brussels, Belgium. Research Fellow, Centre for Economic Policy Research (CEPR), International Trade Programme, London, U.K. Research Fellow, Center for Financial Studies (CFS), Frankfurt, Germany. Research Fellow, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IFW), Kiel, Germany. External Research Fellow, Centre for Research and Analysis of Migration (CReAM), University College London, U.K. External Research Fellow, Leverhulme Centre for Research on Globalisation and Economic Policy (GEP), University of Nottingham, U.K. PAST POSITIONS 2001-2014. Research Fellow, Fondazione ENI Enrico Mattei (FEEM), Milan, Italy. 2008-2013. Full Professor of Economics, Department of Economics, Bocconi University, 1 Milan, Italy. Taught courses: International Economics, Macroeconomics. 2009-2011. Coordinator of the PhD Degree Program in Economics. 2011-2013. Vice-Director, Paolo Baffi Centre on Central Banking and Financial Regulation, Bocconi University, Milan, Italy. 2002-2013. Research Fellow, Knowledge, Internationalization and Technology Studies (KITES, formerly CESPRI), Bocconi University, Milan, Italy.
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vitae De Philippe Martin
    Philippe Martin Curriculum vitae Professeur d’économie Sciences Po +33(0)145497629 email: [email protected] web-page: http://econ.sciences-po.fr/staff/philippe-martin Etat civil: né le 18-01-1966, nationalité française Activités principales actuelles : - Professeur à Sciences Po depuis mars 2009 - Research fellow: Centre for Economic Policy Research (CEPR), Londres; Programmes International Macroeconomics et International Trade - Membre du Conseil d’Analyse Economique du Premier ministre Parcours professionnel : - Institut Universitaire des Hautes Etudes Internationales (Université de Genève) : Chargé de cours et de recherche, 1992-1999 - Chercheur associé : CEPII, Paris, 1995-1997 - Chercheur associé, CERAS-ENPC, Paris, depuis 1997 (plein temps 1997-2000) - Professeur à l'Université de Lille1, 2000-2001, agrégé (agrégation 2000 ; rang : second) - Economiste, Research Department, Federal Reserve Bank of New York , 2001-2002 - Professeur chargé de cours à l'Ecole Polytechnique 1999-2006 - Chercheur associé : CERAS unité CNRS, Ecole Nationale des Ponts et Chaussées, depuis 1997, PSE depuis 2005 - Professeur à l’Université de Paris-1 ( CES, unité CNRS), 2002-2009 - Professeur à l’Ecole d’Economie de Paris, Chaire de professeur, 2007-2009 - Membre junior de l’Institut Universitaire de France, 2005-2010 - Co-directeur du programme macroéconomie du CEPREMAP (2005-2010) - Directeur du département d’économie de Sciences Po (2009-2013) Formation - 1988-92, Ph.D., Georgetown University, Washington D.C., économie, 1992. - 1987-88: D.E.A
    [Show full text]
  • Full Issue Download
    The Journal of The Journal of Economic Perspectives Economic Perspectives The Journal of Spring 2021, Volume 35, Number 2 Economic Perspectives Symposia European Union Philip R. Lane, “The Resilience of the Euro” Keith Head and Thierry Mayer, “The United States of Europe: A Gravity Model Evaluation of the Four Freedoms” David Dorn and Josef Zweimüller, “Migration and Labor Market Integration in Europe” Florin Bilbiie, Tommaso Monacelli, and Roberto Perotti, “Fiscal Policy in Europe: Controversies over Rules, Mutual Insurance, and Centralization” Preventive Medicine A journal of the Joseph P. Newhouse, “An Ounce of Prevention” American Economic Association Amanda E. Kowalski, “Mammograms and Mortality: How Has the Evidence Evolved?” Spring 2021 Volume 35, Number 2 Spring 2021 Volume Articles M.V. Lee Badgett, Christopher S. Carpenter, and Dario Sansone, “LGBTQ Economics” Nicolás Campos, Eduardo Engel, Ronald D. Fischer, and Alexander Galetovic, “The Ways of Corruption in Infrastructure: Lessons from the Odebrecht Case” Benjamin F. Jones, “The Rise of Research Teams: Benets and Costs in Economics” Feature Timothy Taylor, “Recommendations for Further Reading” Spring 2021 The American Economic Association The Journal of Correspondence relating to advertising, busi- Founded in 1885 ness matters, permission to quote, or change Economic Perspectives of address should be sent to the AEA business EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE office: [email protected]. Street ad- Elected Officers and Members A journal of the American Economic Association dress: American Economic Association, 2014 Broadway, Suite 305, Nashville, TN 37203. For President membership, subscriptions, or complimentary DAVID CARD, University of California, Berkeley Editor access to JEP articles, go to the AEA website: Heidi Williams, Stanford University http://www.aeaweb.org.
    [Show full text]
  • Thierry Mayer
    August 9, 2016 Thierry Mayer Professor of Economics Born June 27 1971, Sciences-Po in Boulogne Billancourt (France) Email : [email protected] Professional address Sciences-Po 28, rue des Saints-P`eres 75007 Paris TEL: +33 1 53 68 55 52 HomePage: https://sites.google.com/site/thierrymayer/home Positions Held Professor of Economics at Sciences-Po, Sept. 2009- Consultant at Banque de France, Sept. 2014- Research Fellow at CEPR (International Trade and Regional Economics Programme), Mar. 2009- Scientific Advisor at CEPII, Sept. 2001- Professor of Economics at the University of Paris 1-Paris School of Economics, Sept. 2006-Aug. 2009. Research Affiliate at CEPR (International Trade Programme), Jan. 2002-Feb. 2009. Associate Researcher at PSE, Sept. 2000-Sept. 2006 (coordinator of the international economics / development group 2005-2006) Professor of Economics at the University of Paris Sud, Sept. 2002- Aug. 2006. Visiting Professor at the College of Europe (Bruges), 2004-2006. Associate Professor (Ma^ıtrede conf´erences)at the University of Paris 1 Panth´eonSorbonne, Sept. 2000-Aug. 2002. Education 2002: French national exam for full professorship (Agr´egationde l'enseignement sup´erieuren sci- ences ´economiques). Rank: 1. 1996/1999: PhD : \Comportements strat´egiques de localisation des firmes multinationales" (Strate- gic Location Choices by Multinational Firms) supervised by Pr. Jean-Louis Mucchielli. De- fense held in the University of Paris I, January 6 2000. Members of the Jury: Rodolphe Dos Santos Ferreira, Lionel Fontagn´e,Didier Laussel, Pierre Morin, Leo Sleuwaegen, Jacques Thisse. 1 Awards 2012: Principal Investigator of the ERC grant HETMAT (Heterogeneity that Matters for Trade and Welfare, (FP7 Grant Agreement no.
    [Show full text]
  • 2010 Reading List
    ECO572 - International Economics - 2010 Reading List Agnès Bénassy-Quéré, Benoît Coeuré ECO572 - INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS - 2010 READING LIST TEXTBOOKS Lessons 1 to 3: International trade Paul Krugman and Maurice Obstfeld, International Economics: Theory and Policy, Addison Wesley, 2009, Part 1 and Part 2. Traduction/adaptation française par G. Capelle- Blancard et Matthieu Crozet : Economie internationale, Pearson Education, 2009. Thierry Mayer et Jean-Louis Mucchielli, Economie internationale, éd. Dalloz, 2005, parties 1, 2 et 4. Lesson 4: Economic geography Richard Baldwin, Rikard Forslid, Philippe Martin, Gianmarco Ottaviano, Fréderic Robert-Nicoud, Economic Geography and Public Policy, Princeton University Press, 2005 Pierre-Philippe Combes, Thierry Mayer et Jacques-François Thisse, Economie géographique, éd. Economica, 2006. Economic Geography, Princeton University Press, 2008. Thierry Mayer et Jean-Louis Mucchielli, Economie internationale, éd. Dalloz, 2005, partie 3. Lessons 5 to 9: Exchange rate and international finance Paul Krugman and Maurice Obstfeld, International Economics: Theory and Policy, Addison Wesley, 2009, Part 3 and Part 4. Traduction/adaptation française par G. Capelle- Blancard et Matthieu Crozet : Economie internationale, Pearson Education, 2009. Maurice Obstfeld and Kenneth Rogoff, Foundations of International Economics, MIT Press, 1996. Asbjørn Rødseth: Open Economy Macroeconomics, Cambridge University Press, 2000. Mark Taylor and Lucio Sarno, The Economics of Exchange Rates, Cambridge University Press, 2003. ECO572 - International Economics - 2010 Reading List REFERENCE ARTICLES Lesson 3 Paul Krugman (1979) “Increasing Returns, Monopolistic Competition, and International Trade”, Journal of International Economics, 9, pp. 469–479. Paul Krugman (1980), “Scale Economies, Product Differentiation and the Pattern of Trade,” American Economic Review, 70, pp. 950-959. Marc Melitz (2003), “The Impact of Trade on Intra-Industry Reallocations and Aggregate Industry Productivity,” Econometrica, 71 (6), pp.
    [Show full text]
  • Market Size, Competition, and the Product Mix of Exporters
    American Economic Review 2014, 104(2): 495–536 http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/aer.104.2.495 Market Size, Competition, and the Product Mix of Exporters† By Thierry Mayer, Marc J. Melitz, and Gianmarco I. P. Ottaviano* We build a theoretical model of multi-product firms that highlights how competition across market destinations affects both a firm’s exported product range and product mix. We show how tougher competition in an export market induces a firm to skew its export sales toward its best performing products. We find very strong confirmation of this competitive effect for French exporters across export market destinations. Theoretically, this within-firm change in product mix driven by the trading environment has important repercussions on firm productivity. A calibrated fit to our theoretical model reveals that these productivity effects are potentially quite large. JEL D21, D24, F13, F14, F41, L11 ( ) Exports by multi-product firms dominate world trade flows. Variations in these trade flows across destinations reflect in part the decisions by multi-product firms to vary the range of their exported products across destinations with different mar- ket conditions.1 In this paper, we further analyze the effects of those export market conditions on the relative export sales of those goods: we refer to this as the firm’s product mix choice. We build a theoretical model of multi-product firms that high- lights how market size and geography the market sizes of, and bilateral economic ( distances to, trading partners affect both a firm’s exported product range and its ) exported product mix across market destinations.
    [Show full text]