DOCSLIB.ORG

Jersey Terms of Business

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Jersey Terms of Business Jersey Terms of Business By choosing to make use of the fiduciary services of 1.9 “Data Subjects” means the Connected Persons Trident Trust Company Limited the Client and/or Client of the Client or Client Entity and, to the extent Entity agrees to accept all of the following terms of applicable, its customers or other persons with business of this Agreement: whom a Client Entity deals; 1. Definitions 1.10 “Economic Substance Law” means the Taxation 1.1 “Agreement” means these terms of business (Companies – Economic Substance) (Jersey) together with any Written Agreement or services Law 2019; agreement between the Service Provider, the Client, and/or the Client Entity (whether company 1.11 “FSJL” means the Financial Services (Jersey) administration, secretarial or nominee); Law 1998 (as amended); 1.2 “Applicable Law” means any law, regulation or 1.12 “JFSC” means the Jersey Financial code of practice that applies to the provision Services Commission; of the Services; 1.13 “PEP”, being a “politically exposed person”, has 1.3 “Applicable Regulator” means any financial the same meaning given to it under Article 15(6) services, anti-money laundering or other of the Money Laundering (Jersey) Order 2008; regulator or supervisory body that, by Applicable Law, has regulatory or supervisory oversight over 1.14 “PC (J)L 1999” means the Proceeds of Crime any Service Provider; (Jersey) Law 1999 (as amended) and the regulations made thereunder; 1.4 “Client” means the Service Provider’s instructing party(ies) and the client(s) of record, individually 1.15 “Relevant Activities” shall have the same or jointly as the context requires; definition as given to that term in the Economic Substance Law; 1.5 “Client Entity” means the individual, legal entity, association, trustee, nominee or partnership 1.16 “Relevant Data” means personal data and/or (whether or not having separate legal personality) sensitive data relating to the Data Subjects, in receiving the Services from time to time (whether each case as defined in the Data Protection Law; or not incorporated or established on the date of this Agreement); 1.17 “Sensitive Activity” means any activity deemed sensitive by the JFSC under its “Sound Business 1.6 “Confidential Information” means all non-public Practice Policy”, as amended, replaced or information which relates to the operations or substituted by such other analogous policy business of a party whether disclosed by a party from time to time; or by a third party and which (i) is designated or marked as confidential or (ii) given the nature 1.18 “Service Provider” means Trident Trust Company of the information or the circumstances Limited, any of its subsidiaries comprising a surrounding its disclosure, reasonably should registered person under the FSJL and each of be considered as confidential; their respective Connected Persons from time to time who are engaged in providing the Services; 1.7 “Connected Persons” means in relation to a person, that person’s directors, partners, 1.19 “Services” means the following: (i) trust, company employees, officers, agents, consultants, or foundation formation, administration and representatives or contractors; registered agent services; (ii) reporting and other administration services specifically relating 1.8 “Data Protection Law” means the Data compliance with the requirements of the Protection (Jersey) Law 2018 or any other law which amends or replaces that law; © 2020, Trident Trust. All rights reserved. 7.20 WWW.TRIDENTTRUST.COM Jersey Economic Substance Law; and (iii) any other 3.2 Any general terms and conditions of the Client, ancillary services as may be agreed between Client Entity or of any of its related entities are the parties in the Agreement; rejected explicitly. 1.20 “Tax Information Exchange Agreements” means 3.3 Trident Trust Company Limited shall hold the any laws, treaties and regulations created to benefit of the provisions of this Agreement for enable automatic exchange of tax information its benefit and on trust for the benefit of each and include the Agreement to Improve Service Provider. International Tax Compliance and to Implement FATCA entered into between Jersey and the 4. The Service Provider United States of America on 13 December 4.1 The Service Provider will provide the Services 2013, the Agreement to Improve International (or such other services as may be agreed in Tax Compliance entered into between Jersey writing between the Client and/or Client Entity and the United Kingdom on 22 October 2013 and the Service Provider) with reasonable skill and the OECD Common Reporting Standard and care and in all cases as soon as reasonably for Automatic Exchange of Financial Account practical. Time shall not be of the essence of Information; and this Agreement. 1.21 “Written Engagement” means any agreement 4.2 The Service Provider shall be entitled to retain in writing entered into by the Service Provider any other entity which is part of the Service and the Client or a Client Entity relating to the Provider’s group and/or any sub-contractor terms of provision of the Services (including to perform all or part of the Services on administration, management, nominee and behalf of the Service Provider, without need custodian agreements). for prior consent of the Client or Client Entity. Notwithstanding any such engagement, the 2. Confirmations Service Provider shall remain fully responsible 2.1 This Agreement (as may be amended from time for the fulfilment of any of its obligations under to time) constitutes the exclusive basis on which this Agreement. the Service Provider provides the Services to the Client or Client Entity. A copy of the Services 4.3 The Service Provider shall only take instructions Provider’s terms of business may also be found from the Client and/or Client Entity. Subject to at www.tridenttrust.com. Clause 11.2 and Clause 11.4, no instructions shall be taken from such third party or any 2.2 When Services are provided pursuant to this information regarding the Client or the Client Agreement, the representations relating to Entity will be provided to such third party without the Client or Client Entity will be deemed the Service Provider having first obtained the automatically to apply, unless the Client or consent of the Client or Client Entity. Client Entity advises the Service Provider to the contrary, and are given in consideration of the 4.4 The Service Provider shall not be required Service Provider agreeing to provide the Services. or obliged to take any action which it considers to be unlawful or improper or which may cause 2.3 Trident Trust Company Limited and each member it to incur any personal liability and the Service of its regulatory affiliation is licensed and Provider shall not be liable for refusing to take regulated by the JFSC. The Services provided any such action. by the Service Provider are subject to the FSJL and the relevant codes of practice issued by the 4.5 The Service Provider shall not provide the JFSC from time to time pursuant to the FSJL. Client or Client Entity with any legal, tax, fiscal or exchange control advice in relation to or 3. Scope of Agreement connection with any structure. 3.1 These terms apply to: 4.6 The Service Provider may confirm in writing 3.1.1 all Agreements; to the Client or Client Entity any instructions and information given to it. Where the Service 3.1.2. all agreements arising from and/or Provider does so, the Client or Client Entity in relation to the Agreements; and is responsible for correcting any errors or misunderstandings. Unless and until the 3.1.3 all offers, proposals and quotations made Service Provider is advised by the Client or by the Service Provider to the Client or a Client Entity otherwise, the Service Provider Client Entity. shall be entitled to proceed on the basis of the understanding of the instructions or information as set out in such confirmation. 2 WWW.TRIDENTTRUST.COM Jersey 5. Obligations of the Client and Client Entity standard required by the Applicable 5.1 The Client and Client Entity are responsible Regulator as soon as practical (and in any for determining that the scope of the Services event within seven (7) days) of receipt. is appropriate for its needs. 5.5 Furthermore, in addition to the obligations 5.2 The Client and Client Entity are responsible in Clauses 5.3 and 5.4 above, the Client and for providing and updating, in a timely manner, the Client Entity acknowledges that the Service all information, assistance and facilities that Provider may be required by the Economic the Service Provider may require to enable it Substance Law to comply with certain reporting to provide the Services. The Client and Client obligations in relation to the business and Entity shall provide information that is true, activities of the Client and the Client Entity accurate and not misleading. The Service and accordingly Client shall, and shall procure Provider may use the information and data that the Client Entity shall: furnished by the Client or Client Entity without further audit or verification. 5.5.1 notify the Service Provider at the earliest opportunity (and in any event within seven 5.3 The Client and Client Entity shall procure that (7) days) where the Client Entity currently the Service Provider is provided from time to undertakes, or proposes to undertake time with any information relating to it or the Relevant Activities in Jersey pursuant persons concerned with it (including without to the Economic Substance Law; limitation, its Connected Persons), the nature of its
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Linguistic Context 34
    Variation and Change in Mainland and Insular Norman Empirical Approaches to Linguistic Theory Series Editor Brian D. Joseph (The Ohio State University, USA) Editorial Board Artemis Alexiadou (University of Stuttgart, Germany) Harald Baayen (University of Alberta, Canada) Pier Marco Bertinetto (Scuola Normale Superiore, Pisa, Italy) Kirk Hazen (West Virginia University, Morgantown, USA) Maria Polinsky (Harvard University, Cambridge, USA) Volume 7 The titles published in this series are listed at brill.com/ealt Variation and Change in Mainland and Insular Norman A Study of Superstrate Influence By Mari C. Jones LEIDEN | BOSTON Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Jones, Mari C. Variation and Change in Mainland and Insular Norman : a study of superstrate influence / By Mari C. Jones. p. cm Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-90-04-25712-2 (hardback : alk. paper) — ISBN 978-90-04-25713-9 (e-book) 1. French language— Variation. 2. French language—Dialects—Channel Islands. 3. Norman dialect—Variation. 4. French language—Dialects—France—Normandy. 5. Norman dialect—Channel Islands. 6. Channel Islands— Languages. 7. Normandy—Languages. I. Title. PC2074.7.J66 2014 447’.01—dc23 2014032281 This publication has been typeset in the multilingual “Brill” typeface. With over 5,100 characters covering Latin, IPA, Greek, and Cyrillic, this typeface is especially suitable for use in the humanities. For more information, please see www.brill.com/brill-typeface. ISSN 2210-6243 ISBN 978-90-04-25712-2 (hardback) ISBN 978-90-04-25713-9 (e-book) Copyright 2015 by Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, The Netherlands. Koninklijke Brill NV incorporates the imprints Brill, Brill Nijhoff and Hotei Publishing.
    [Show full text]
  • The Sources of Jersey Law Richard Southwell, QC
    Return to Contents The Sources Of Jersey Law Richard Southwell, QC This modest note is a voyage of personal exploration, not a statement of judicial views. Suppose that an English and Welsh/Scottish/Northern Irish QC receives the honour of appointment to the Court of Appeal of Jersey. He (or she) knows nothing of Jersey law and its sources. Where does he or she begin? The starting point now, as always since the Jersey Court of Appeal came into existence in 1964, is to consult Sir Godfray Le Quesne QC, whose advice, crisp, to the point and accurate, has unfailingly sustained several generations of non-Jersey members of the Court of Appeal. After that one must consult the books. Much help can be found in the Reports of the Commissioners appointed to enquire into the criminal law of Jersey (1847) ("the Criminal Report") and the civil, municipal and ecclesiastical laws of Jersey (1861) ("the Civil Report"). These Commissioners had the tasks of carrying out a thorough investigation of the laws and courts of Jersey, and not surprisingly they started with the sources of Jersey law, considering these under the two heads of common or customary law, and legislation. It is convenient to refer first to legislation, of which there are these kinds: 1. Royal Charters, which are listed in the appendix to the Criminal Report of 1847, including a charter attributed to the reign of King John (see the same Appendix at page 72) which, whether authentic or not, and of whatever date, has been recognised as correctly recording established privileges of the inhabitants of Jersey.
    [Show full text]
  • Private Client 2018 7Th Edition
    TheICLG International Comparative Legal Guide to: Private Client 2018 7th Edition A practical cross-border insight into private client work Published by Global Legal Group, in association with CDR, with contributions from: Aird & Berlis LLP Maples and Calder Alon Kaplan, Advocate and Notary Law Office Matheson Aronson, Ronkin-Noor, Eyal Law Firm Miller Thomson LLP Arqués Ribert Junyer – Advocats MJM Limited Berwin Leighton Paisner LLP Mori Hamada & Matsumoto Bircham Dyson Bell LLP Mourant Ozannes Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP New Quadrant Partners Limited DORDA Rechtsanwälte GmbH O’Sullivan Estate Lawyers LLP Griffiths & Partners and Coriats Trust Company Limited Ospelt & Partner Attorneys at Law Ltd. Hassans International Law Firm P+P Pöllath + Partners Higgs & Johnson Rovsing & Gammeljord Holland & Knight LLP Society of Trust and Estate Practitioners (STEP) Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP Spenser & Kauffmann Attorneys at Law Khaitan & Co Studio Tributario Associato Facchini Rossi & Soci (FRS) Lebenberg Advokatbyrå AB Tirard, Naudin, Société d’avocats Lenz & Staehelin Vieira de Almeida Loyens & Loeff Withers Bergman LLP Macfarlanes LLP Zepos & Yannopoulos The International Comparative Legal Guide to: Private Client 2018 General Chapters: 1 BREXIT: The Immigration Implications – James Perrott, Macfarlanes LLP 1 2 Keep Calm and Carry On: The Increasing UK Regulatory and Tax Issues Facing Offshore Trustees – Matthew Braithwaite & Helen Ratcliffe, Bircham Dyson Bell LLP 11 3 Pre-Immigration Planning Considerations for the HNW Client – Think
    [Show full text]
  • The Jews in the Channel Islands During the German Occupation (Brief Overview of Facts & Discussion Questions for the Classroom)
    Topic: The Jews in the Channel Islands during the German Occupation (brief overview of facts & discussion questions for the classroom) Between October 1940 and August 1942, nine consecutive antisemitic Orders were registered in the Royal Courts of Jersey and Guernsey at the request of the German occupiers. Orders were also registered in Sark. Jurat Abraham Lainé in Guernsey and Bailiff Alexander Coutanche in Jersey are alleged to have been the only people who spoke up against just one of these Orders: that of wearing the yellow star. The Orders against the Jews included: Being registered with registration card stamped with a red J; Declaring economic undertakings (including those belonging to gentile spouses); Aryanization of Jewish businesses (forced liquidization of Jewish businesses); Curfew for Jews & prohibition on moving house without permission; Ban on Jews from places of entertainment; restriction of shopping hours; Wearing a yellow star (not enforced). The exact number of people affected by the antisemitic is difficult to calculate; we do not know what the wartime Jewish population was in Jersey or Guernsey, but we think at least 30 people were affected. Not everyone who was Jewish came forward to be registered, but the registration cards of those who did were stamped with a red letter J. Jersey Aliens Officer, Clifford Orange, was particularly diligent in encouraging Jews to register, especially if they were in doubt about whether they should. Two of those known to be Jewish who did not come forwards to be registered were Miriam Jacobs in Guernsey and Lucy Schwob in Jersey. Lucy was a surrealist artist who became part of a two-woman resistance group with her partner, Suzanne Malherbe.
    [Show full text]
  • Business Crime 2016 6Th Edition a Practical Cross-Border Insight Into Business Crime
    ICLGThe International Comparative Legal Guide to: Business Crime 2016 6th Edition A practical cross-border insight into business crime Published by Global Legal Group, in association with CDR, with contributions from: Anagnostopoulos Criminal Law & Litigation Łaszczuk & Partners Baker & Partners Linklaters LLP BCL Burton Copeland Maples and Calder BLOOMFIELD LAW PRACTICE Matheson Clayton Utz MJM Limited De Pedraza Abogados, S.L.P. Nishimura & Asahi Debevoise & Plimpton LLP REQUENA ABOGADOS, S.C. Diaz, Reus & Targ LLP Rogério Alves & Associados, Sociedade de ELIG, Attorneys-at-Law Advogados, RL Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP Simmons & Simmons LLP Gürlich & Co. Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP Haldanes Stetter Rechtsanwälte Haxhia & Hajdari Attorneys at Law Studio Legale Pisano Homburger Williams & Connolly LLP Ivanyan and Partners Law Firm wkklaw attorneys at law Kachwaha and Partners Zamfirescu Racoţi & Partners Lampert & Partner Attorneys at Law Ltd. Attorneys at Law Zavadetskyi Advocates Bureau The International Comparative Legal Guide to: Business Crime 2016 General Chapters: 1 No Place to Hide: the New Normal in Cross-Border Tax Enforcement – Ryan Junck & Pamela Lawrence Endreny, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP 1 2 When Should Organisations be Held Criminally Liable? – Tom McNeill & Guy Bastable, BCL Burton Copeland 6 Contributing Editors 3 The Developing Partnership Between Financial Institutions and Law Enforcement: Gary DiBianco & Ryan Junck, Skadden, Arps, Slate, a UK Perspective – Stephen Gentle, Simmons & Simmons LLP 11 Meagher & Flom LLP 4 Maintaining Privilege in Cross Border Investigations – A US / UK Comparison – Sean Hecker Head of Business & Karolos Seeger, Debevoise & Plimpton LLP 15 Development Dror Levy 5 Coerced Corporate Social Responsibility and the FCPA – Joel M.
    [Show full text]
  • THE BRITISH CHANNEL ISLANDS UNDER GERMAN OCCUPATION ‒ 00 Channel Prelims Fp Change 8/4/05 11:31 Am Page Ii
    00 Channel prelims fp change 8/4/05 11:31 am Page i THE BRITISH CHANNEL ISLANDS UNDER GERMAN OCCUPATION ‒ 00 Channel prelims fp change 8/4/05 11:31 am Page ii Maurice Gould attempted to escape from Jersey with two teenage friends in a small boat in May . Aged only , he was caught and imprisoned in Jersey, then moved to Fresne prison near Paris before being transferred to SS Special Camp Hinzert. Brutally mistreated, Maurice Gould died in the arms of his co-escapee Peter Hassall in October . Initially buried in a German cemetery surrounded by SS graves, his remains were repatriated to Jersey through the efforts of the Royal British Legion in , were he was reinterred with full honours. 00 Channel prelims fp change 8/4/05 11:31 am Page iii THE BRITISH CHANNEL ISLANDS UNDER GERMAN OCCUPATION ‒ Paul Sanders SOCIETE JERSIAISE JERSEY HERITAGE TRUST 00 Channel prelims fp change 8/4/05 11:31 am Page iv First published by Jersey Heritage Trust Copyright © Paul Sanders ISBN --- The right of Paul Sanders to be identified as the author of this work has been asserted by him in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act . All rights reserved. With the exception of quoting brief passages for the purpose of review, no part of this publication may be recorded, reproduced or transmitted by any means, including photocopying, without written permission from the publisher. Printed in Great Britain by Biddles Ltd., King’s Lynn 00 Channel prelims fp change 8/4/05 11:31 am Page v Mr F L M Corbet MEd FRSA Sir Peter Crill KBE Mr D G Filleul OBE Mr W M Ginns MBE Mr J Mière Mr R W Le Sueur Jurat A Vibert 00 Channel prelims fp change 8/4/05 11:31 am Page vi The Jersey Heritage Trust and the Société Jersiaise are most grateful to the following for providing financial support for the project.
    [Show full text]
  • Service of Process Rules 2019 Contents
    Service of Process Rules 2019 Contents SERVICE OF PROCESS RULES 2019 Contents Rule PART 1 3 SERVICE OUTSIDE JERSEY OF PROCESS OF JERSEY COURTS 3 1 Scope of this Part ............................................................................................ 3 2 Interpretation ................................................................................................. 3 3 Grounds for Service out of the jurisdiction .................................................... 4 4 Application for permission to serve the Summons out of the jurisdiction .... 4 5 Service of documents other than the Summons – permission ...................... 5 6 Notice of proceedings – non-parties .............................................................. 5 7 Methods of service – general provisions ........................................................ 5 8 Service through foreign governments, judicial authorities and British Consular authorities ........................................................................................ 6 9 Procedure where service is to be through foreign governments, judicial authorities and British Consular authorities ................................................... 6 10 Service by other methods ............................................................................... 7 11 Service of summons or other document on a State ....................................... 7 12 Translation of summons or other document .................................................. 8 13 Undertaking to be responsible for expenses .................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Fraud, Asset Tracing & Recovery
    INSOLVENCY AS A TOOL How and when to use in asset recovery BITCOIN BATTLES Tracing and seizing cryptoassets Commercial Dispute Resolution COVID-19 FRAUD CDR Recovering assets lost in the pandemic www.cdr-news.com Spring 2021 ESSENTIAL INTELLIGENCE: Fraud, Asset Tracing & Recovery Contributing Editor: Keith Oliver Peters & Peters Solicitors LLP 4 WELCOME TABLE OF CONTENTS EXPERT ANALYSIS New threats for 2021 and beyond 06 France Andrew Mizner Commercial Dispute Resolution 90 Thomas Rouhette, Nicolas Brooke, Ela Barda & Jennifer Melo Signature Litigation Insolvency used as a tool in asset recovery 10 Andrew Stafford QC & James Chapman-Booth Guernsey Kobre & Kim 100 Simon Florance, John Greenfield & David Jones Carey Olsen Cryptocurrency fraud and asset recovery 17 Syedur Rahman Rahman Ravelli Hong Kong 110 Dorothy Siron Zhong Lun Law Firm Corruption in the pandemic and the importance of 22 asset recovery India Angela Barkhouse Quantuma Advisory Limited 124 Shreyas Jayasimha & Aakash Sherwal Aarna Law Fraud and asset tracing investigations: the role of 28 Ireland corporate intelligence - part II 132 Karyn Harty & Audrey Byrne McCann FitzGerald Alexander Davies & Peter Woglom BDO Japan International civil or criminal law tools that can be 144 42 Hiroyuki Kanae, Hidetaka Miyake & Atsushi Nishitani used to aid in asset recovery Anderson Mōri & Tomotsune Olga Bischof & Theodore Elton Brown Rudnick Confiscation proceedings and civil recovery: 152 Jersey 48 proportionality and abuse of process Marcus Pallot, Richard Holden & Daniel Johnstone Colin Wells 25 Bedford Row Carey Olsen Luxembourg 160 Max Mailliet E2M – Etude Max Mailliet COUNTRY CHAPTERS Singapore 168 Lee Bik Wei & Lee May Ling Allen & Gledhill Bermuda 56 Keith Robinson & Kyle Masters Carey Olsen Spain 178 Héctor Sbert & Maria de Mulder Lawants British Virgin Islands 63 Alex Hall Taylor QC, Richard Brown, Tim Wright & Switzerland Simon Hall Carey Olsen 188 Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • The Asset Tracing and Recovery Review
    The Asset TheTracing Cartels and Leniency and Review Recovery Review Reproduced with permission from Law Business Research Ltd. Third Edition Tis article was frst published in Te Cartels and Leniency Review, 2nd edition (published in January 2014 – editor Christine A Varney). Editor For furtherRobert information Hunter please email [email protected] Law Business Research The Asset Tracing and Recovery Review Te Asset Tracing and Recovery Review Reproduced with permission from Law Business Research Ltd. Tis article was frst published in Te Asset Tracing and Recovery Review - Edition 3 (published in September 2015 – editor Robert Hunter) For further information please email [email protected] The Asset Tracing and Recovery Review Tird Edition Editor Robert Hunter Law Business Research Ltd PUBLISHER Gideon Roberton SENIOR BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT MANAGER Nick Barette SENIOR ACCOUNT MANAGERS Katherine Jablonowska, Tomas Lee, Felicity Bown, Joel Woods ACCOUNT MANAGER Jessica Parsons PUBLISHING MANAGER Lucy Brewer MARKETING ASSISTANT Rebecca Mogridge EDITORIAL ASSISTANT Sophie Arkell HEAD OF PRODUCTION Adam Myers PRODUCTION EDITOR Caroline Herbert SUBEDITOR Janina Godowska MANAGING DIRECTOR Richard Davey Published in the United Kingdom by Law Business Research Ltd, London 87 Lancaster Road, London, W11 1QQ, UK © 2015 Law Business Research Ltd www.TeLawReviews.co.uk No photocopying: copyright licences do not apply. Te information provided in this publication is general and may not apply in a specifc situation, nor does it necessarily represent the views of authors’ frms or their clients. Legal advice should always be sought before taking any legal action based on the information provided. Te publishers accept no responsibility for any acts or omissions contained herein.
    [Show full text]
  • Conducting Civil Proceedings in Jersey
    Conducting civil proceedings in Jersey Introduction The Bailiwick of Jersey is a British Crown Dependency off the coast of Normandy and 120 miles south of England. It has its own parliament, known as the States of Jersey, and its own legal system and judicial function, which are separate from those of any other jurisdiction. It has fiscal autonomy from the United Kingdom. In terms of the sources of Jersey law, Jersey has drawn historically in the sphere of property, contract and succession law on Norman French customary law. In other areas, such as tort and criminal law, the development of Jersey law has been heavily influenced by English law. As to trusts, so important and integral to the Island’s finance industry, the Trusts (Jersey) Law 1984 as amended (“the Trusts Law”) is very closely modelled on English trusts law. English legal authorities are regularly referred to in cases before the courts of Jersey. More recently, the shape of the Island’s juisprudence has been determined by statute passed by the States of Jersey. In terms of civil procedure, the Royal Court of Jersey has enacted its own rules, the Royal Court Rules 2004 as amended (“the Rules”). These will be familiar to English practitioners who recall the days of civil procedure before the Woolf reforms. Based on the White Book 1999, the Rules regulate the conduct of civil matters before the Jersey Courts. The Courts For lower value cases (up to £10,000) the court of first instance is the Petty Debts Court which now has jurisdiction to hear both liquidated and unliquidated claims.
    [Show full text]
  • Vodafone Mobile Broadband End User Licence Agreements
    Vodafone Mobile Broadband End User Licence Agreements Version 0.3 March 2012 Vodfone Mobile Broadband End User Licences INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................................... 4 ALBANIA - VODAFONE ALBANIA....................................................................................................................... 5 AUSTRALIA - VODAFONE AUSTRALIA ............................................................................................................. 7 AUSTRIA - A1 ...................................................................................................................................................... 10 AZERBAIJAN - AZERFON .................................................................................................................................. 12 BAHRAIN - ZAIN BH ........................................................................................................................................... 14 BELGIUM - PROXIMUS....................................................................................................................................... 16 BULGARIA - M-TEL BG ...................................................................................................................................... 24 CHILE - ENTEL PCS............................................................................................................................................ 26 CONGO (DRC) - VODACOM CONGO
    [Show full text]
  • Terms of Business for Legal Services
    TERMS AND CONDITIONS applicable for the relevant Engagement. 1. INTRODUCTION 1.6 The “Client” and "you" refers to the 1.1 These terms and conditions of client or clients purchasing services business ("T&Cs") apply to clients of from us. Advocate Carl Geoffrey Parslow (and his partners) trading as Parslows, 1.7 The “Engagement” is as defined in Parslows Jersey, and Parslows either the Retainer Letter and or the Notaries, Parslows Executors Limited Schedule. trading as Parslows Wills & Probate and/or Parslows International 1.8 The “Retainer Letter” is the letter Limited trading as Parslows provided to the Client in relation to International in respect of any legal the provision of Legal Services and the professional services and/or advice “Schedule” provides specific details of and/or notarial services and/or other the Engagement. services provided by us that we are asked to provide and/or arrange 1.9 If there is any inconsistency between ("Legal Services"). the detail in the Retainer Letter, the Schedule and or the T&Cs, the detail 1.2 The T&Cs and any related Retainer on the Schedule will prevail. Letter and Schedule explain the basis upon which we accept instructions 2. BASIS OF THE RETAINER and charge for Legal Services. 2.1 We contract with you for the provision 1.3 These T&Cs the Retainer Letter and of Legal Services on the basis of the Schedule shall together constitute the T&Cs, the Retainer Letter and the contract for the provision of Legal Schedule only and acceptance by us of Services in relation to any any instructions from a Client shall be Engagement.
    [Show full text]