DOCSLIB.ORG

Committees of Correspondence

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Committees of Correspondence Committees of Correspondence (Edited from Wikipedia) The Committees of Correspondence were shadow governments organized by the Patriot leaders of the Thirteen Colonies on the eve of the American Revolution. They coordinated responses to England and shared their plans; by 1773 they had emerged as shadow governments, superseding the colonial legislature and royal officials. The Maryland Committee of Correspondence was instrumental in setting up the First Continental Congress, which met in Philadelphia. These served an important role in the Revolution, by disseminating the colonial interpretation of British actions between the colonies and to foreign governments. The committees of correspondence rallied opposition on common causes and established plans for collective action, and so the group of committees was the beginning of what later became a formal political union among the colonies. A total of about 7,000 to 8,000 Patriots served on these committees at the colonial and local levels, comprising most of the leadership in their communities—the Loyalists were excluded. The committees became the leaders of the American resistance to British actions, and largely determined the war effort at the state and local level. When Congress decided to boycott British products, the colonial and local committees took charge, examining merchant records and publishing the names of merchants who attempted to defy the boycott by importing British goods. The committees promoted patriotism and home manufacturing, advising Americans to avoid luxuries, and lead a more simple life. The committees gradually extended their power over many aspects of American public life. They set up espionage networks to identify disloyal elements, displaced the royal officials, and helped topple the entire Imperial system in each colony. In late 1774 and early 1775, they supervised the elections of provincial conventions, which took over the actual operation of colonial government. Function A major function of the committees in each colony was to inform the voters of the common threat faced by all the colonies, and to disseminate information from the main cities to the rural hinterlands where most of the colonists lived. As news was typically spread in hand-written letters or printed pamphlets to be carried by couriers on horseback or aboard ships, the committees were responsible for ensuring that this news accurately 1 reflected the views of their parent governmental body on a particular issue and was dispatched to the proper groups. Many correspondents were also members of the colonial legislative assemblies, and were active in the secret Sons of Liberty or even the Stamp Act Congress of the 1760s. History The earliest committees of correspondence were formed temporarily to address a particular problem. Once a resolution was achieved, they were disbanded. The first formal committee was established in Boston in 1764 to rally opposition to the Currency Act and unpopular reforms imposed on the customs service. During the Stamp Act Crisis the following year, New York formed a committee to urge common resistance among its neighbors to the new taxes. The Province of Massachusetts Bay correspondents responded by urging other colonies to send delegates to the Stamp Act Congress that fall. The resulting committees disbanded after the crisis was over. Boston, whose radical leaders thought it was under increasingly hostile threats by the royal government, set up the first long-standing committee with the approval of a town meeting in late 1772. By spring 1773, Patriots decided to follow the Massachusetts system and began to set up their own committees in each colony. Virginia appointed an eleven-member committee in March, quickly followed by Rhode Island, Connecticut, New Hampshire, and South Carolina. By February 1774, eleven colonies had set up their own committees; of the thirteen colonies that eventually rebelled, only North Carolina and Pennsylvania had not. Massachusetts In Massachusetts, in November 1772, Samuel Adams and Dr. Joseph Warren formed a committee in response to the Gaspée Affair and in relation to the recent British decision to have the salaries of the royal governor and judges be paid by the Crown rather than the colonial assembly, which removed the colony of its means of controlling public officials. In the following months, more than one hundred other committees were formed in the towns and villages of Massachusetts. The Massachusetts committee had its headquarters in Boston and under the leadership of Adams became a model for other radical groups. The meeting when establishing the committee gave it the task of stating "the rights of the colonists, and of this province in particular, as men, as Christians, and as subjects; to communicate and publish the same to the several towns in this province and to the world as the sense of this town." 2 Virginia In March 1773, Dabney Carr proposed the formation of a permanent Committee of Correspondence before the Virginia House of Burgesses. Virginia's own committee was formed on March 12, 1773. Its members were Peyton Randolph, Robert Carter Nicholas, Richard Bland, Richard Henry Lee, Benjamin Harrison, Edmund Pendleton, Patrick Henry, Dudley Digges, Dabney Carr, Archibald Cary, and Thomas Jefferson. Pennsylvania Among the last to form a committee of correspondence, Pennsylvania did so at a meeting in Philadelphia on May 20, 1774. In a compromise between the more radical and more conservative factions of political activists the committee was formed by combining the lists each proposed. That committee of 19 diversified and grew to 43, then to 66 and finally to two different groups of 100 between May 1774 and its dissolution in September 1776. One hundred sixty men participated in one or more of the committees, but only four were regularly elected to all of them: Thomas Barclay, John Cox, Jr., John Dickinson, and Joseph Reed. Delaware A committee of correspondence was established by Thomas McKean after ten years of agitation centered in New Castle County. In neighboring Kent County Caesar Rodney set up a second committee, followed by Sussex County. Following the recommendation of Congress in 1774, the committees were replaced by elected "committees of inspection" with a subcommittee of correspondence. The new committees specialize in intelligence work, especially the identification of men opposed to the Patriot cause. The committees were in the lead in demanding independence. The correspondence committees exchanged information with others in Boston and Philadelphia, and elsewhere. Their leadership often was drawn upon to provide Delaware with executive leaders. The committees of inspection used publicity as weapons to suppress disaffection and encourage patriotism. With imports from Britain cut off, the committees sought to make America self-sufficient, so they encouraged the raising of flax and sheep for wool. The committees helped organize local militia in the hundreds and later in the counties and all of Delaware. With their encouragement, the Delaware Assembly elected delegates to Congress favorable to independence. 3 North Carolina By 1773, the political situation had deteriorated. There was concern about the courts. Massachusetts' young and ardent Boston patriot, Josiah Quincy, Jr. visited North Carolina staying five days. He spent the night of March 26, 1773 at Cornelius Harnett's home near Wilmington, North Carolina. The two discussed and drew up plans for a Committee of Correspondence. The committee's purpose: communicate circumstances and revolutionary sentiment among the colonies. It was after this meeting that Quincy dubbed Harnett the "Samuel Adams of North Carolina." Perhaps characteristic of Committees of Correspondence members, Harnett was celebrated, distinguished, scholarly and possessed of unflinching integrity. Harnett's father (also named Cornelius Harnett) was Sheriff of Albemarle, an area covering about 11 modern counties in northeastern North Carolina. The Correspondence Committee formed the next year at Wilmington. Although Harnett was absent, he was made chairman of the committee. Other colonies By July 1773, Rhode Island, Connecticut, New Hampshire, and South Carolina had also formed committees. With Pennsylvania's action in May 1774 all of the colonies that eventually rebelled had such committees. The colonial committees successfully organized common resistance to the Tea Act and even recruited physicians who wrote drinking tea would make Americans "weak, effeminate, and valetudinarian for life." These permanent committees performed the important planning necessary for the First Continental Congress, which convened in September 1774. The Second Congress created its own committee of correspondence to communicate the American interpretation of events to foreign nations. On December 17, 1774 John Lamb and others in New York City formed the last New York committee. This committee included Isaac Sears, Alexander McDougall, and others. These committees were replaced during the revolution with Provincial Congresses. 4.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Revolutionary Movement in New York, 1773–1777
    University of Kentucky UKnowledge United States History History 1966 The Road to Independence: The Revolutionary Movement in New York, 1773–1777 Bernard Mason State University of New York at Binghamton Click here to let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Thanks to the University of Kentucky Libraries and the University Press of Kentucky, this book is freely available to current faculty, students, and staff at the University of Kentucky. Find other University of Kentucky Books at uknowledge.uky.edu/upk. For more information, please contact UKnowledge at [email protected]. Recommended Citation Mason, Bernard, "The Road to Independence: The Revolutionary Movement in New York, 1773–1777" (1966). United States History. 66. https://uknowledge.uky.edu/upk_united_states_history/66 The 'l(qpd to Independence This page intentionally left blank THE ROAD TO INDEPENDENCE The 'R!_,volutionary ~ovement in :J{£w rork, 1773-1777~ By BERNARD MASON University of Kentucky Press-Lexington 1966 Copyright © 1967 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY PRESS) LEXINGTON FoR PERMISSION to quote material from the books noted below, the author is grateful to these publishers: Charles Scribner's Sons, for Father Knickerbocker Rebels by Thomas J. Wertenbaker. Copyright 1948 by Charles Scribner's Sons. The Bobbs-Merrill Company, Inc., for John Jay by Frank Monaghan. Copyright 1935 by the Bobbs-Merrill Com­ pany, Inc., renewed 1962 by Frank Monaghan. The Regents of the University of Wisconsin, for The History of Political Parties in the Province of New York J 17 60- 1776) by Carl L. Becker, published by the University of Wisconsin Press. Copyright 1909 by the Regents of the University of Wisconsin.
    [Show full text]
  • Delaware: Allan Mclane
    Delaware: Allan McLane Born in Philadelphia, PA on August 8, 1746, Allan McLane was one of George Washington’s boldest soldiers, but most reluctant U.S. marshals. By the time the American Revolution began, McLane had moved to Delaware, where he had a trading business, and immediately enlisted as a lieutenant in Caesar Rodney's Delaware Regiment. McLane’s company numbered about one hundred men, and included some Oneida Indian scouts. So devoted was he to his troops, that McLane used much of his inherited fortune for their pay and equipment. McLane participated in Washington’s disastrous New York Campaign of 1776.109 During this military campaign and the Battle of Princeton in January 1777, McLane earned a promotion to captain and began a legendary career as a cavalryman and spy.110 McLane utilized different disguises to infiltrate British camps and gather vital information that contributed to the success of American forces at the battles of Monmouth Courthouse (June 28, 1778) and Stoney Point (July 16, 1779).111 On another occasion, a wounded McLane personally killed two British soldiers and escaped capture, despite being abandoned by his three companions. Collectively, McLane’s courage and daring personality helped him earn the rank of colonel by the end of the war in 1783.112 Portrait of Allan McLane. Courtesy of the State of Delaware Office of Historical and Cultural Affairs 109 He was also one of the first offices to question Benedict Arnold’s loyalty. 110 “History - The First Generation of United States Marshals/The First Marshal of Delaware: Allan McLane,” U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • “Extracts from Some Rebel Papers”: Patriots, Loyalists, and the Perils of Wartime Printing
    1 “Extracts from some Rebel Papers”: Patriots, Loyalists, and the Perils of Wartime Printing Joseph M. Adelman National Endowment for the Humanities Fellow American Antiquarian Society Presented to the Joint Seminar of the McNeil Center for Early American Studies And the Program in Early American Economy and Society, LCP Library Company of Philadelphia, 1314 Locust Street, Philadelphia 24 February 2012 3-5 p.m. *** DRAFT: Please do not cite, quote, or distribute without permission of the author. *** 2 The eight years of the Revolutionary War were difficult for the printing trade. After over a decade of growth and increasing entanglement among printers as their networks evolved from commercial lifelines to the pathways of political protest, the fissures of the war dispersed printers geographically and cut them off from their peers. Maintaining commercial success became increasingly complicated as demand for printed matter dropped, except for government printing, and supply shortages crippled communications networks and hampered printers’ ability to produce and distribute anything that came off their presses. Yet even in their diminished state, printers and their networks remained central not only to keeping open lines of communication among governments, armies, and civilians, but also in shaping public opinion about the central ideological issues of the war, the outcomes of battles, and the meaning of events affecting the war in North America and throughout the Atlantic world. What happened to printers and their networks is of vital importance for understanding the Revolution. The texts that historians rely on, from Common Sense and The Crisis to rural newspapers, almanacs, and even diaries and correspondence, were shaped by the commercial and political forces that printers navigated as they produced printed matter that defined the scope of debate and the nature of the discussion about the war.
    [Show full text]
  • Hudson Valley Ring
    Peekskill, NY -- A Site on a Revolutionary War Road Trip http://revolutionaryday.com/usroute9/peekskill/default.htm Books US4 NY5 US7 US9 US9W US20 US60 US202 US221 Canal On March 23, 1777, 500 British troops disembarked from 10 ships sent up the Hudson to attack the storehouse at Peekskill. 250 American troops manned the storehouse at Peekskill under the command of Alexander McDougall. McDougall withdrew into the town and asked for support from Fort Montgomery across the river. Col Marinus Willett arrived with 80 men and with the General's permission led an attack on the British who were burning military supplies. Willett fired on the British and charged with bayonets forcing the British to retreat. On June 24, 1781, Washington set up camp in Peekskill and waited for French forces that left Newport, RI on June 9th under the command of General Rochambeau. When the French arrived, the combined armies performed exercises and demonstrations to intimidate the British in New York City. However, Washington and Rochambeau decided that a larger force would be necessary to lay siege to the city. Instead, Washington abandoned his efforts in New York and took half of his forces and the French forces to surround and overwhelm Cornwallis in the south. Clinton in New York would not figure out what Washington was up to for over two weeks and would not send a force out to rescue Cornwallis for another month. Clinton was informed of the surrender enroute and turned back to New York City. Today, there’s a beautiful park on the Hudson at Peekskill.
    [Show full text]
  • Delaware in the American Revolution (2002)
    Delaware in the American Revolution An Exhibition from the Library and Museum Collections of The Society of the Cincinnati Delaware in the American Revolution An Exhibition from the Library and Museum Collections of The Society of the Cincinnati Anderson House Washington, D. C. October 12, 2002 - May 3, 2003 HIS catalogue has been produced in conjunction with the exhibition, Delaware in the American Revolution , on display from October 12, 2002, to May 3, 2003, at Anderson House, THeadquarters, Library and Museum of the Society of the Cincinnati, 2118 Massachusetts Avenue, NW, Washington, D. C. 20008. It is the sixth in a series of exhibitions focusing on the contributions to the American Revolution made by the original 13 he season loudly calls for the greatest efforts of every states and the French alliance. Tfriend to his Country. Generous support for this exhibition was provided by the — George Washington, Wilmington, to Caesar Rodney, Delaware State Society of the Cincinnati. August 31, 1777, calling for the assistance of the Delaware militia in rebuffing the British advance to Philadelphia. Collections of the Historical Society of Delaware Also available: Massachusetts in the American Revolution: “Let It Begin Here” (1997) New York in the American Revolution (1998) New Jersey in the American Revolution (1999) Rhode Island in the American Revolution (2000) Connecticut in the American Revolution (2001) Text by Ellen McCallister Clark and Emily L. Schulz. Front cover: Domenick D’Andrea. “The Delaware Regiment at the Battle of Long Island, August 27, 1776.” [detail] Courtesy of the National Guard Bureau. See page 11. ©2002 by The Society of the Cincinnati.
    [Show full text]
  • The Minuteman
    The Minuteman Central Florida SAR Chapter Volume 57, Issue 1I February 2018 Chartered on Chapter Meeting Dates to Remember! May 8, 1961 Chapter Meeting - March 10, 2018: John February 10, 2018 Marshal: Virginian, Revolutionary Soldier, & Judicial Craftsman of the American Revo- At this meeting, our speaker lution. will be Compatriot Richard Hoffman. His presentation is titled “Flintlocks Last Naval Battle of the American Revolu- and Various Weapons of the American tion Celebration- March 10, 2018: This Revolution.” event will take place at the MI Veterans Cen- ter in Merritt Island, FL. This meeting will be held in the Duxbury Hall of the Mayflower Retire- 241st Anniversary of the Battle of Thomas ment Community Center located at Creek - April 7, 2018: This event will be Meeting Location: 1620 Mayflower Court in Winter Park, held in Jacksonville, Florida. More infor- Florida. A time of socializing will mation will be announced once the event is The Mayflower begin at 11:30 am with lunch being more finalized. served at noon. The cost of the lunch is $18.00. 1720 Mayflower Chapter Meeting: Patriot’s Luncheon - April 14, 2018. Court The entrée choices are: Beef Winter Park, FL Brisket, Herb Grilled Chicken, Fish of FLSSAR Spring Board of Management/ 32792 the Day, or Salad Plate. Note that each Annual Meeting - May 18 thru 20, 2018: This event will be held at the Embassy Suites meal comes with an assortment of veg- Orlando - Lake Buena Vista South located at etables, starch, salad or soup, and a des- 4955 Kyngs Heath Rd, Kissimmee, FL sert. Coffee and tea is also served with 34746.
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of Weather on Armies During the American War of Independence, 1775-1781 Jonathan T
    Florida State University Libraries Electronic Theses, Treatises and Dissertations The Graduate School 2011 The Force of Nature: The Impact of Weather on Armies during the American War of Independence, 1775-1781 Jonathan T. Engel Follow this and additional works at the FSU Digital Library. For more information, please contact [email protected] THE FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF ARTS AND SCIENCES THE FORCE OF NATURE: THE IMPACT OF WEATHER ON ARMIES DURING THE AMERICAN WAR OF INDEPENDENCE, 1775-1781 By JONATHAN T. ENGEL A Thesis submitted to the Department of History in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Degree Awarded: Spring Semester, 2011 The members of the committee approve the thesis of Jonathan T. Engel defended on March 18, 2011. __________________________________ Sally Hadden Professor Directing Thesis __________________________________ Kristine Harper Committee Member __________________________________ James Jones Committee Member The Graduate School has verified and approved the above-named committee members. ii This thesis is dedicated to the glory of God, who made the world and all things in it, and whose word calms storms. iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Colonies may fight for political independence, but no human being can be truly independent, and I have benefitted tremendously from the support and aid of many people. My advisor, Professor Sally Hadden, has helped me understand the mysteries of graduate school, guided me through the process of earning an M.A., and offered valuable feedback as I worked on this project. I likewise thank Professors Kristine Harper and James Jones for serving on my committee and sharing their comments and insights.
    [Show full text]
  • The Military Hospitals at Bethlehem and Lititz During the Revolution
    THE MILITARY HOSPITALS AT BETHLEHEM AND LIT1TZ DURING THE REVOLUTION. BY JOHN W. JORDAN. Reprinted from The Pennsylvania Magazine of History and Biography, July, 1896. PHILADELPHIA. 1896. THE MILITARY HOSPITALS AT BETHLEHEM AND LITITZ DURING THE REVOLUTION. BY JOHN W. JORDAN. Reprinted from The Pennsylvania Magazine of History and Biography, July, 1896. PHILADELPHIA. 1896. THE MILITARY HOSPITALS AT BETHLEHEM AND LITITZ DURING THE REVOLUTION. For six years, from 1775 to 1781, Bethlehem was a thor- oughfare for troops; twice in that interval it was the seat of a general hospital, and, in addition to the heavy baggage and munitions of war of the army and Washington’s pri- vate baggage being parked in its suburbs, with its guard of two hundred Continentals commanded by Colonel Wil- liam Polk, of North Carolina, many of its houses were oc- cupied by American troops and British prisoners of war, and Congress found a temporary refuge there. The inhabit- ants, therefore, witnessed not only the horrors and expe- rienced the discomforts of war, but also its “ pomp and cir- cumstance,” for at times there were sojourning among them Generals Washington, Lafayette, Greene, Knox, Sterling, Schuyler, Gates, Sullivan, De Kalb, Steuben, Pulaski, and Arnold, with members of their staff, and General Charles Lee’s division of the army, in command of General Sulli- van, was encamped opposite the town. 4 Hospitals at Bethlehem and Lititz during the Revolution. The population of Bethlehem averaged about five hundred souls, mainly domiciled in that pile of solidly built and commodious structures, buttressed and hip-roofed, which bound three sides of the quadrangle on Church Street, in the “ Widows’ House” over the way, and in the building of the single brethren, which fronted on the square.
    [Show full text]
  • CHOOSING INDEPENDENCE, FIGHTING for FREEDOM Delaware and the American Revolution CHAPTER 1
    CHOOSING INDEPENDENCE, FIGHTING FOR FREEDOM Delaware and the American Revolution CHAPTER 1 CHAPTER 1 Caesar Rodney’s Midnight Ride Caesar Rodney’s Midnight Ride 2 Delaware’s Vote 3-4 In the spring of 1776, delegates from all thirteen colonies met in Philadelphia to decide what Letter from Caesar Rodney 5-7 to do about the increasingly bitter argument over taxation without representation and the violence that it had caused. Some delegates wanted to continue trying to reason with King CHAPTER 2 George of Great Britain. Others thought that it was time to break away from Great Britain The 1st Delaware Regiment 8 and become a separate nation. Richard Henry Lee of Virginia proposed a resolution that Sons of the Blue Hen 9-11 the colonies “are, and of right ought to be free and independent states.” African Americans in the American Revolution 12-13 CHAPTER 3 The delegation from Delaware consisted of three men: Thomas McKean, George Read, and War Comes to Delaware 14 Caesar Rodney. McKean was an ardent patriot; he wanted to vote “yes” for independence. A Letter from George Washington 15-19 George Read felt that the colonies were not prepared for independence and certainly could The Battle of Cooch’s Bridge 20-21 not win a war with Great Britain; he wanted to vote “no.” CHAPTER 4 Caesar Rodney was for independence, but at the time he was 80 long miles away, attending to business at Civilian Perspectives 22-25 his home in Dover. Each colony could A British Soldier Lost His Cookpot 26 An American Soldier is Injured During Battle 27-28 have only one vote, determined The Battle of Long Island 29-30 by the majority opinion of the delegates who were present in Philadelphia.
    [Show full text]
  • William Dawes, Jr. (1745-1799) Slab Grave King’S Chapel Burying Ground Boston, Suffolk Co., Massachusetts Patriot Index / Revolutionary War Graves Register Nat’L
    1 William Dawes, Jr. (1745-1799) slab grave King’s Chapel Burying Ground Boston, Suffolk Co., Massachusetts Patriot Index / Revolutionary War Graves Register Nat’l. Society SAR (NSSAR) Louisville, KY, Headquarters December 24, 2014 Submitted by James Edward Mitchell, Chairman Texas Society SAR RevWar Graves Committee On the date above, Compatriot Charlie E. Scott, Editor (newsletter) of The Kentucky Pioneer sent along my copy of Vol 10, Issue 10, (pg 15) that arrived upon my doorstep with a small color photograph of the front street entrance of the ‘Green Dragon’ Tavern at Boston taken previously by Compatriot Tom Geimeier. Charlie, Tom Higgins Past Pres., of the KYSSAR, and, I go back together, through reenacting in colonial clothing to perpetuate our shared American societal beginnings during the Revolutionary War. This story is shared for the benefit of any NSSAR Compatriot to speak publically and factually about Boston’s Seat of Revolution and an American spy cell and first patriot intelligence network on record, known as the Mechanics. This group grew out of another organization, Sons of Liberty that had successfully formed to oppose the dreaded Stamp Act. Kenneth A. Daigler’s book entitled: Spies, Patriots and Traitors published in 2014 by the Georgetown University Press at WDC, depicts the Boston branch of the ‘Sons of Liberty’ over the summer of 1765 as achieving modest success at spreading information and furthering a united political position against the British authorities while, radical more violent street leaders preferred riots, looting, physical destruction of the stamps, and assaults on British stamp agents. In Boston riots were anything but calm organized demonstrations! Daigler wrote that activists enjoyed intimidating local British officials.
    [Show full text]
  • Stony Brook University
    SSStttooonnnyyy BBBrrrooooookkk UUUnnniiivvveeerrrsssiiitttyyy The official electronic file of this thesis or dissertation is maintained by the University Libraries on behalf of The Graduate School at Stony Brook University. ©©© AAAllllll RRRiiiggghhhtttsss RRReeessseeerrrvvveeeddd bbbyyy AAAuuuttthhhooorrr... The Sense of the City: Politics and Culture in Pre-Revolutionary New York City A Dissertation Presented by Luke John Feder to The Graduate School in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History Stony Brook University December 2010 Copyright by Luke John Feder 2010 Stony Brook University The Graduate School Luke John Feder We, the dissertation committee for the above candidate for the Doctor of Philosophy degree, hereby recommend acceptance of this dissertation. Ned C. Landsman — Dissertation Advisor Professor, Department of History Donna J. Rilling — Chairperson of the Defense Associate Professor, Department of History Kathleen Wilson Professor, Department of History Andrew Newman Assistant Professor, Department of English, Stony Brook University This dissertation is accepted by the Graduate School Lawrence Martin Dean of the Graduate School ii Abstract of the Dissertation The Sense of the City: Politics and Culture in Pre-Revolutionary New York City by Luke John Feder Doctor of Philosophy in History Stony Brook University 2010 This dissertation explores how political partisanship and local understandings of British political culture shaped New York City’s reaction to the revolutionary crisis of the 1760s and 1770s. I investigate how the Livingston faction, DeLancey faction, and Sons of Liberty each attempted to define and manipulate “the sense of the city” to suit its private agenda. In the eighteenth century, “the sense of the city” and other similar phrases stood for public opinion.
    [Show full text]
  • The New York Gazette and Weekly Mercury
    NEW-YORK GAZETTE And The WEEKLY MERCURY ISSUE No. 3 NOVEMBER 1775 LATEST INTELLIGENCES: Congress Votes to Raise Troops for the Continental Army, Johannes Snyder northward, it is rumored that they are to NEW-YORK: appointed to Command invade Canada. Likewise, Henry Knox, a corpulent Boston bookseller become Alexander McDougall Slain by Mob The Congress voted to raise 2000 troops Washington’s Colonel of Artillery, has and dispatch them to Boston to join George departed camp; it is said that his A unruly horde of mischief makers attacked Washington’s Continental Army. It also destination is Fort Ticonderoga on Lake the bowery home of Alexander McDougall appointed Johannes Snyder General and Champlain, with an eye toward creating a determined to give him a coat of tar-and- commander of the New York Continental “noble train of artillery” for the army from feathers (they claimed to be outraged by the Brigade. It remains however to be seen, if the cannon that were captured at that place secret proceedings of the Congress – which Brigade. It remains however to be seen, if last May. the hellish demons attributed to the wily sufficient recruits for this force can be Scot’s machinations). McDougall remained found and how the brigade is to be paid for. true to his Whig principles refused to either Doctor Church Exposed as a Spy flee or to beg assistance from the King’s Troops in Fort George. When the crowd In his dispatch to Congress of October 4, began to try to break down his door, Congress votes to allow Plebians to elect one member to the Provincial Congress.
    [Show full text]