The English Fleet at the Battle of the Gabbard 2 & 3 June 1653

The English Fleet at the Battle of the Gabbard 2 & 3 June 1653 The First Squadron. Resolution 88 General Monck and General Deane Advice 42 Jeremy Smith Sapphire 38 Nicholas Heaton Pelican 40 Peter Mortham Golden Fleece 44 Nicholas Forster Society 44 Nicholas Lucas Martin 14 John Vesey Fortune,fireship 10 Humphrey Morris Worcester 50 George Dakins Diamond 42 William Hill Marmaduke 42 Edward Blagg Mermaid 26 John King Loyalty 34 John Limbry Malaga Merchant 36 Henry Collins Fox,fireship 10 ? Cornelius Renown,fireship 10 James Salmon Triumph 62 Vice-Admiral James Peacock Adventure 40 Robert Nixon Bear 46 Francis Kirby Hound 36 Jonah Hide London 40 Arthur Brown Mary 36 Henry Maddison Laurel 48 John Stokes Providence 33 John Pearce Heartsease 36 Thomas Weight. Anne and Joyce 34 William Pile Hannibal 44 William Haddock Thomas and William 36 John Jefferson Speaker 56 Rear-Admiral Samuel Howett Guinea 34 Edmund Curtis Violet 40 Henry Southwood Falmouth 26 John Jeffrey Hamburg Merchant 34 William Jessell Sussex 46 Roger Cuttance Tiger 40 Gabriel Sanders Sophia 38 Roger Kirby Four Sisters 30 Robert Beck Phoenix 34 Henry Eaden The Second Squadron. James 66 Admiral William Penn Ruby 42 Robert Sanders Foresight 42 Richard Stayner Anne Piercy 33 Thomas Hare Exchange 30 Henry Tiddeman Richard and Martha 46 Eustace Smith 1 Lisbon Merchant 38 Simon Baily Lion 50 John Lambert Assistance 40 William Crispin Portsmouth 38 Robert Dornford Peter 32 John Littleton Merlin 12 George Crapnell Sarah 34 Francis Stewart Falcon,fireship 10 ? ? Victory 60 Vice-Admiral Lionel Lane Expedition 32 Thomas Vollis Middleburg 32 Thomas Whiting Exchange 32 Jeffrey Dare Prudent Mary 28 John Taylor Centurion 42 Walter Wood Gillyflower 32 John Hayward Raven 38 Robert Taylor Globe 30 Robert Coleman Thomas and Lucy 34 Andrew Rand Andrew 56 Rear-Admiral Thomas Graves Crown 36 ? Thompson Princess Maria 38 Seth Hanley Reformation 40 Anthony Derning Industry 30 Benjamin Salmon Assurance 36 Phillip Holland Duchess 24 Richard Seafield Waterhound 30 Giles Shelley Pearl 26 James Cadman Third Squadron. George 58 Admiral John Lawson Great President 40 francis Park Success 38 Wiliam Kendall Oak 32 John Edwin Eastland Merchant 32 John Walters Samaritan 30 Shadrach Blake Kentish 50 Joseph Reynolds Nonsuch 40 Thomas Penrose Welcome 40 John Harman Brazil 30 Thomas Heath Adventure 38 Edward Green Hunter,fireship 10 ? ? Vanguard 56 Vice-Admiral Joseph Jordan Dragon 38 John Seaman Paul 38 Anthony Spatchurt Crescent 30 Thomas Thurrowgood Benjamin 32 Robert Sparks Roebuck 30 Henry Fen Entrance 44 Richard Newberry Convert 32 Phillip Gething Gift 34 Thomas Salmon 2 Samuel Talbot 30 Joseph Ames King Ferdinando 36 Richard Paine Rainbow 58 Rear-Admiral William Goodson Amity 36 Henry Pack Arms of Holland 34 Francis Mardrig Jonathan 30 Robert Graves William and John 36 Nathaniel Jesson Blossom 30 Nathaniel Cock Convertine 44 Anthony Joyn Dolphin 30 Robert Davis Tulip 32 Joseph Cubitt Dragoneer 32 Edward Smith Nicodemus 12 William Ledgard General Blake's Squadron which joined the fleet on June 3rd. Essex 48 General Robert Blake Hampshire 38 Robert Blake,junior Culpepper 30 Eagle Employment Hopeful Luke John and Abigail Phoenix 38 prosperous Stork Swan Tenth Whelp 12 William Naval Records Society, A List of the Commnwealth Navy at Sea- Under the Command of The Right Honourable Colonel Richard Deane and Colonel George Monck, Generals and Admirals. 3 .

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Edward Hawke Locker and the Foundation of The
EDWARD HAWKE LOCKER AND THE FOUNDATION OF THE NATIONAL GALLERY OF NAVAL ART (c. 1795-1845) CICELY ROBINSON TWO VOLUMES VOLUME II - ILLUSTRATIONS PhD UNIVERSITY OF YORK HISTORY OF ART DECEMBER 2013 2 1. Canaletto, Greenwich Hospital from the North Bank of the Thames, c.1752-3, NMM BHC1827, Greenwich. Oil on canvas, 68.6 x 108.6 cm. 3 2. The Painted Hall, Greenwich Hospital. 4 3. John Scarlett Davis, The Painted Hall, Greenwich, 1830, NMM, Greenwich. Pencil and grey-blue wash, 14¾ x 16¾ in. (37.5 x 42.5 cm). 5 4. James Thornhill, The Main Hall Ceiling of the Painted Hall: King William and Queen Mary attended by Kingly Virtues. 6 5. James Thornhill, Detail of the main hall ceiling: King William and Queen Mary. 7 6. James Thornhill, Detail of the upper hall ceiling: Queen Anne and George, Prince of Denmark. 8 7. James Thornhill, Detail of the south wall of the upper hall: The Arrival of William III at Torbay. 9 8. James Thornhill, Detail of the north wall of the upper hall: The Arrival of George I at Greenwich. 10 9. James Thornhill, West Wall of the Upper Hall: George I receiving the sceptre, with Prince Frederick leaning on his knee, and the three young princesses. 11 10. James Thornhill, Detail of the west wall of the Upper Hall: Personification of Naval Victory 12 11. James Thornhill, Detail of the main hall ceiling: British man-of-war, flying the ensign, at the bottom and a captured Spanish galleon at top. 13 12. ‘The Painted Hall’ published in William Shoberl’s A Summer’s Day at Greenwich, (London, 1840) 14 13.
[Show full text]
A Study of the Three Anglo-Dutch Wars, 1652-1674 William Terry Curtler
University of Richmond UR Scholarship Repository Master's Theses Student Research Summer 1967 Iron vs. gold : a study of the three Anglo-Dutch wars, 1652-1674 William Terry Curtler Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.richmond.edu/masters-theses Recommended Citation Curtler, William Terry, "Iron vs. gold : a study of the three Anglo-Dutch wars, 1652-1674" (1967). Master's Theses. Paper 262. This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Research at UR Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of UR Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. IRON VS. GOLD A STUDY OF THE THfu~E ANGI.. 0-DUTCH WARS• 16.52-1674 BY WILLIAM TERRY CURTLER A THESIS SUBMITTED TO TH8 GRADUATE r'ACULTY OF THE UNIVERSITY OF RICHMOND IN CANDIDACY FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS IM HISTORY AUGUST, 1967 t.JGRARY UNJVERSHY QF RJCHMONI) VUfQINfA ii Approved for the Department of History and the Graduate School by ciia'.Irman of tne His.tory .Department 111 PREFACE· The purpose of this paper is to show that, as the result ot twenty-two years of intermittent warfare between England and the Netherlands, the English navy became es• tablished as the primary naval power of Europe. Also, I intend to illustrate that, as a by-product of this naval warfare, Dutch trade was seriously hurt, with the· major benefactors of this Dutch loss of trade being the English. This paper grew out of a seminar paper on the first Anglo•Dutch war for a Tudor and Stuart English History graduate seminar class taught in the fall of 1966 by Dr.
[Show full text]
The Diary of Samuel Pepys
'*L ^'''ftA •"4i;i.V>V.l, r. ,;r I* " / ';,!') 1^5' IX. THE DIARY OF SAMUEL PEPYS, M.A., F.R.S. INDEX VOLUME THE DIARY OF SAMUEL PEPYS M.A. F.R.S. CLERK OF THE ACTS AND SECRETARY TO THE ADMIRALTY TRANSCRIBED FROM THE SHORTHAND MANUSCRIPT IN THE PEPYSIAN LIBRARY MAGDALEN COLLEGE CAMBRIDGE BY THE REV. MYNORS BRIGHT M.A. LATE FELLOW AND PRESIDENT OF THE COLLEGE WITH LORD BRA YBROOKE'S NOTES EDITED WITH ADDITIONS BY HENRY B. WHEATLEY F.S.A. Vol. IX.—index LONDON GEORGE BELL & SONS YORK ST. COVENT GARDEN CAMBRIDGE DEIGHTON BELL & CO. 1899 CHISWICK PRESS :—CHARLES WHITTIXGHAM AND CO. TOOKS COURT, CHANCERY LANE, LONDON. 1^3 PREFACE. THE great need of a full Index to such a book as Pepys's Diary is evident to all, but when we come to produce the Index it is not equally certain that we shall be able completely to satisfy those who are to use it. There are two great difficulties which the indexer has to face. The first is, that the consulters of a book consisting of so miscellaneous a contents as this one, come to it with such different tastes and with such different objects that it is almost impossible to please them all. The second is inherent to the compilation of the Index itself A diary such as this presents special pitfalls for the most careful indexer, because Pepys wrote for himself alone, and he knew to whom he referred, but we can never be sure that people with the same name were actually the same persons.
[Show full text]
38. William III 39
50 Masterworks from the Golden Age Dutch medals from the 17th century A joint exhibition by Nomos and John Endlich Antiquairs 50 Masterworks from the Golden Age Dutch medals from the 17th century Introduction The individual who commissioned the medal did not have the exclusive rights to sell and distribute it, rather that right was the artist engraver’s, thus enabling him to sell duplicate medals to other collectors, in this way providing him with additional The study of medals not only relates to silver, silversmiths and income. Not only that, he could re-use the original model to make other medals, so decorative techniques, but to the past as well. Every medal serves as that a number of later pieces could be based on it. It is important to remember the a window on our past history. When they were made medals were special status of the Republic as a governmental authority in Europe, surrounding countries had aristocratic rulers: emperors, kings or princes. In the Republic, how- designed to celebrate a major event or individual. Nowadays, these ever, the States General of the Seven Provinces were the supreme authority, often medals reveal our fascinating history; every piece helps to teach us represented by a Stadthouder, a role that was not always understood abroad. about the significant occurrences of past times. Sometimes they commemorate gallant feats of arms in battles on land or sea, or major state events, such as marriages or alliances; but they can also be more ‘local’, showing us the opening of a canal or the marriage of wealthy citizen.
[Show full text]
The English Fleet at the Three Day Fight Off Portland 18 - 21 February 1653
The English Fleet at the Three Day Fight off Portland 18 - 21 February 1653 Van Squadron. Triumph 60 Admirals of the Red, Robert Blake and Richard Deane Fairfax 56 Vice-Admiral John Lawson,Capt.Andrew Ball Laurel 48 Rear-Admiral Samuel Howett Lion 50 John Lambert President 40 Thomas Graves Foresight 44 Richard Stayner Adventure 38 Robert Nixon Nonsuch 40 Thomas Penrose Pelican 40 John Stoakes Tiger 40 Gabriel Saunders Entrance 44 William Goodson Amity 36 Henry Packe Satisfaction 26 Paul 22 Cygnet 20 Robert Fuller Old Warwick 22 Discovery 20 Thomas Marriot Nicodemus 10 William Ledgant Paradox 14 Hired Merchantmen Eagle 12? Roebuck 26 John Rawlings Angel ? Ruth 30 Edward Thompson Anne Piercy 32 Thomas Hare Mary,ketch ? Reformation 40 Anthony Earning Richard and Martha 44 Eustace Smith Centre Squadron. Speaker 56 Admiral William Penn Victory 60 Vice-Admiral Lionel Lane Assistance 40 Rear-Admiral John Bourne Advice 44 John Day Convertine 44 Anthony Zoyne Ruby 42 Anthony Holding Dragon 36 John Seaman Success 38 William Kendall Assurance 36 Phillip Holland Waterhound 32 Giles Shelley Samson 32 Edmund Button Nightingale 26 John Humphrey Merlin 12 Providence 30 John Pearce Gift 34 Thomas Salmon Plover 26 Robert Robinson Duchess 24 Richard Suffield 1 Pearl 26 James Cadman Falmouth 26 Tenth Whelp 12 Hired Merchantmen Anne and Joyce 34 William Pile Charles 32 Robert Knox Chase 22 Benjamin Gunston Thomas and Lucy 34 Andrew Bond Thomas and William 36 John Jefferson William and John 36 Brazil Frigate 30 Thomas Heath Rear Squadron Vanguard 56 General
[Show full text]
Select Naval Documents
(flattteU Untuerattg ffitbtarg BOUGHT WITH THE INCOME OF THE SAGE ENDOWMENT FUND THE GIFT OF HENRY W. SAGE 1891 Date uue JAN 4 vm. W^tTwUlM^ """""'" """"" DA 70.A3H68" ..Select naval documents. 3 1924 028 018 020 The original of this book is in the Cornell University Library. There are no known copyright restrictions in the United States on the use of the text. http://www.archive.org/details/cu31924028018020 SELECT NAVAL DOCUMENTS CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS C. F. CLAY, Manager LONDON : FETTER LANE, E.C. 4 NEW YORK : THE MACMILLAN CO. BOMBAY 1 CALCUTTA V MACMILLAN AND CO., Ltd. MADRAS ( TORONTO : THE MACMILLAN CO. OF CANADA, Ltd. TOKYO : MARUZEN-KABUSHIKI-KAISHA ALL RIGHTS RESERVED Select Naval Documents Edited by H. W. HODGES, M.A., F.R.Hist.S. Late Exhibitioner of Lincoln College, Oxford Head of History and English Department, Royal Naval College, Dartmouth and E. A. HUGHES, M.A. Late Major Scholar of Trinity College, Cambridge Assistant Master at the Royal Naval College, Dartmouth Cambridge at the University Press 1022 Art Vi A ^'l\rv PRINTED IN ENGLAND PREFACE THE use of 'source-books' in historical studies has been justified by experience: the imagination can hardly fail to be quickened by the living voices of the past. In addition to this purpose—the provision of colour and the heightening of the personal aspect, we have^another—the smoothing of the approach to a highly technical subject. Naval History is so different from land History, and sailing sfups are so different from steamships, that the subject abounds in pitfalls. The belief is still common that the 'big ships' of the Armada w^ere defeated by 'cockle- shells' manned by volunteers; plans of battles still appear in which ships are shown sailing straight into the wind ; the strategy of blockade is frequently discussed in the abstract, apart from its practical problems.
[Show full text]
By My Lords Comand, I Am to Acquainte You”: an Edition of the Seventeenth-Century Correspondence of the Wentworth Family in the Folger Shakespeare Library
“By my Lords comand, I am to acquainte you”: An Edition of the Seventeenth-Century Correspondence of the Wentworth Family in the Folger Shakespeare Library Johanna Rastas MA Thesis English, English Philology School of Languages and Translation Studies University of Turku April 2016 The originality of this thesis has been checked in accordance with the University of Turku quality assurance system using the Turnitin OriginalityCheck service. UNIVERSITY OF TURKU School of Languages and Translation Studies / Faculty of Humanities RASTAS, JOHANNA: ”By my Lords comand, I am to acquainte you”: An Edition of the Seventeenth-Century Correspondence of the Wentworth Family in the Folger Shakespeare Library MA Thesis, 134 pp., appendices 9 pp. English philology April 2016 – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – This thesis is an edition of the correspondence of the Yorkshirean Wentworth family. The aim of the edition is to provide these handwritten manuscripts to a wider audience by transcribing them. The material has been acquired from the Folger Shakespeare Library, and the transcriptions presented in this thesis are a part of their database called Early Modern Manuscripts Online. My material consists of fifteen documents from the early modern period which have been sent to or sent by members of the Wentworth family. Fourteen of these documents are letters, and one is a warrant written in the form of a letter. In the Folger Shakespeare Library the documents form the section 2.1. Correspondence of the Wentworth family in a larger collection called Papers of the Cavendish-Talbot family. The documents have been transcribed diplomatically in order to retain the character of the original manuscripts.
[Show full text]
OF CROMWELLIAN ENGLAND by Gilbert Farthing
THE COUNTRY-CITY "ALLIANCE" OF CROMWELLIAN ENGLAND 1658 - 1660 by Gilbert Farthing B.A., University of London, 1950. A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS in the Department of HISTORY We accept this thesis as conforming to the required standard. THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA April 1962 s In presenting this thesis in partial fulfilment of the requirements for an advanced degree at the University of British Columbia, I agree that the Library shall make it freely available for reference and study. I further agree that permission for extensive copying of this thesis for scholarly purposes may be granted by the Head of my Department or by his representatives. It is understood that copying or publication of this thesis for financial gain shall not be allowed without my written permission. ABSTRACT ii This thesis originated in an attempt to explain the Restoration of Charles II. If the Puritan Revolution had been, as it was portrayed in school history lessons, a successful revolt of "the people" against a tyrant, why was the iyyant's libidinous son joyfully welcomed-.; less than twenty years after the revolt? From reading the two major works of the past century which had specifically dealt with this period — Guizot and Davies — it emerged that "the people" had very little to do with the Revolution, and still less with the Restoration. Guizot's emphasis on the part played by General Monk obviously arose from the author's tendency to narrate events rather than probe for causes. Davies, completing the long ser• ies of works begun by Gardiner and continued by Firth, was also largely concerned with narration.
[Show full text]