Stichwortverzeichnis Stichwortverzeichnis
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Doyle F. Brunson (Conceived September 9, 1933) Is a US Registered Poker Musician That Tried Properly for Longer Than Fifty Years
Doyle F. Brunson (conceived September 9, 1933) is a US registered poker musician that tried properly for longer than fifty years. She's a two-time Wsop Top Level winner, a Gaming Hall of Fame member, along with author of numerous magazines on gaming. SEC investigation Brunson is pair On-line poker fists called after him. One pay, a 8 and a a couple of any fit, needs his name while he snagged the No Reduce Harbor 'Em time over the Economy Series of Poker a couple of years one after with them (1976 and 1977), in the two caser making a a stuffed house. Inside 1976 and 1977, he had been an underdog the actual final <Blank>. Another pay known as the "Doyle Brunson," specifically in Tx, are the star and princess of every businessman since, because he affirms on page 519 of Super/System, he "rarely works this arm." He changes his phrasing in Super/System 2, still, remembering that she "efforts to rarely meet this handheld." Hamilton moved to City, when the rest teamed up and traveled around completely, wagering on gaming, golf and, in Doyle's term, "pretty much everything." They pooled their for wagering and after four decades, they made their earliest important visit to City and puzzled everyone of it, a six- figure extent. They thought I would stop being as couples though remain friends. Now well into his time of life, Brunson is just as populated <Blank> ever and, by his money, even earning additional than he squanders. From humble root to just one pretty important drives in gambling proper, Brunson means it when he claims, "A dude with funds are no match against a man for a journey." Brunson had begun playing gaming before his problem, performing five-card change and uncovering it "effective." He played further often Since we have been hurt with his profits invite his payments. -
03/26/04 Chip / Token Tracking Time: 04:45 PM Sorted by City - Approved Chips
Date: 03/26/04 Chip / Token Tracking Time: 04:45 PM Sorted by City - Approved Chips Licensee ----- Sample ----- Chip/ City Approved Disapv'd Token Denom. Description LONGSTREET INN & CASINO 09/21/95 00/00/00 CHIP 5.00 OLD MAN WITH HAT AND CANE. AMARGOSA LONGSTREET INN & CASINO 09/21/95 00/00/00 CHIP 25.00 AMARGOSA OPERA HOUSE AMARGOSA LONGSTREET INN & CASINO 09/21/95 00/00/00 CHIP 100.00 TONOPAM AND TIDEWATER CO. AMARGOSA LONGSTREET INN & CASINO 01/12/96 00/00/00 TOKEN 1.00 JACK LONGSTREET AMARGOSA LONGSTREET INN & CASINO 06/19/97 00/00/00 CHIP NCV, HOT STAMP, 3 COLORS AMARGOSA AMARGOSA VALLEY BAR 11/22/95 00/00/00 TOKEN 1.00 GATEWAY TO DEATH VALLEY AMARGOSA VALLEY STATELINE SALOON 06/18/96 00/00/00 CHIP 5.00 JULY 4, 1996! AMARGOSA VALLEY STATELINE SALOON 06/18/96 00/00/00 CHIP 5.00 HALLOWEEN 1996! AMARGOSA VALLEY STATELINE SALOON 06/18/96 00/00/00 CHIP 5.00 THANKSGIVING 1996! AMARGOSA VALLEY STATELINE SALOON 06/18/96 00/00/00 CHIP 5.00 MERRY CHRISTMAS 1996! AMARGOSA VALLEY STATELINE SALOON 06/18/96 00/00/00 CHIP 5.00 HAPPY NEW YEARS 1997! AMARGOSA VALLEY STATELINE SALOON 06/18/96 00/00/00 CHIP 5.00 HAPPY EASTER 1997! AMARGOSA VALLEY STATELINE SALOON 06/21/96 00/00/00 CHIP 0.25 DORIS JACKSON, FIRST WOMAN OF GAMING AMARGOSA VALLEY STATELINE SALOON 06/21/96 00/00/00 CHIP 0.50 DORIS JACKSON, FIRST WOMAN OF GAMING AMARGOSA VALLEY STATELINE SALOON 06/21/96 00/00/00 CHIP 1.00 DORIS JACKSON, FIRST WOMAN OF GAMING AMARGOSA VALLEY STATELINE SALOON 06/21/96 00/00/00 CHIP 2.50 DORIS JACKSON, FIRST WOMAN OF GAMING AMARGOSA VALLEY STATELINE SALOON -
Early Round Bluffing in Poker Author(S): California Jack Cassidy Source: the American Mathematical Monthly, Vol
Early Round Bluffing in Poker Author(s): California Jack Cassidy Source: The American Mathematical Monthly, Vol. 122, No. 8 (October 2015), pp. 726-744 Published by: Mathematical Association of America Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.4169/amer.math.monthly.122.8.726 Accessed: 23-12-2015 19:20 UTC Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/page/ info/about/policies/terms.jsp JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Mathematical Association of America is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to The American Mathematical Monthly. http://www.jstor.org This content downloaded from 128.32.135.128 on Wed, 23 Dec 2015 19:20:53 UTC All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions Early Round Bluffing in Poker California Jack Cassidy Abstract. Using a simplified form of the Von Neumann and Morgenstern poker calculations, the author explores the effect of hand volatility on bluffing strategy, and shows that one should never bluff in the first round of Texas Hold’Em. 1. INTRODUCTION. The phrase “the mathematics of bluffing” often brings a puzzled response from nonmathematicians. “Isn’t that an oxymoron? Bluffing is psy- chological,” they might say, or, “Bluffing doesn’t work in online poker. -
Abiding Chance: Online Poker and the Software of Self-Discipline
ESSAYS Abiding Chance: Online Poker and the Software of Self- Discipline Natasha Dow Schüll A man sits before a large desktop monitor station, the double screen divided into twenty- four rectangles of equal size, each containing the green oval of a poker table with positions for nine players. The man is virtu- ally “seated” at all twenty- four tables, along with other players from around the world. He quickly navigates his mouse across the screen, settling for moments at a time on flashing windows where his input is needed to advance play at a given table. His rapid- fire esponsesr are enabled by boxed panels of colored numbers and letters that float above opponents’ names; the letters are acronyms for behavioral tendencies relevant to poker play, and the numbers are statistical scores identifying where each player falls in a range for those tendencies. Taken together, the letters and numbers supply the man with enough information to act strategically at a rate of hundreds of hands per hour. Postsession, the man opens his play- tracking database to make sure the software has successfully imported the few thousand hands he has just played. After quickly scrolling through to ensure that they are all there, he recalls some particularly challenging hands he would like to review and checks a number Thanks to Paul Rabinow and Limor Samimian- Darash, for prompting me to gather this material for a different article, and to Richard Fadok, Paul Gardner, Lauren Kapsalakis, and the students in my 2013 Self as Data graduate seminar at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, for helping me to think through that material. -
Article 3 Understanding Hand Strength After the Flop Pokerlist
Article 3 Understanding Hand Strength After The Flop Pokerlist.org For the most part, post flop play is determined by the strength of your hand and the relative hand strength of your opponent’s hand range. It sounds really complicated but it really isn’t. On the flop when the three community cards are dealt, you will have a better understanding of the strength of your hand and whether or not you should bet. If you have some type of made hand you have to decide if you likely have the best hand. It will almost become second nature to ask yourself how the flop could have changed the strength of your hand? Let’s take a look at the strength of hands to consider after the Flop. Monster hands don’t occur very often and include quads, boats, flushes, and straights. These hands are almost certainly the best hand if it goes to showdown and should be played like the nuts. You want to create big pots when you have monster hands. The second category is very strong hands, which include sets and two pair hands. Whenever you have these hands you likely have the best hand. Sure, you will sometimes lose with set over set, but if you are not playing sets and two pairs like the nuts, quite often you will not be extracting maximum value. Overpairs and top pair hands are the next group of strong hands. Depending on your opponents, with these hands you can usually expect to extract three streets of value when you are doing the betting. -
Kill Everyone
Kill Everyone Advanced Strategies for No-Limit Hold ’Em Poker Tournaments and Sit-n-Go’s Lee Nelson Tysen Streib and Steven Heston Foreword by Joe Hachem Huntington Press Las Vegas, Nevada Contents Foreword.................................................................................. ix Author’s.Note.......................................................................... xi Introduction..............................................................................1 How.This.Book.Came.About...................................................5 Part One—Early-Stage Play . 1. New.School.Versus.Old.School.............................................9 . 2. Specific.Guidelines.for.Accumulating.Chips.......................53 Part Two—Endgame Strategy Introduction.........................................................................69 . 3. Basic.Endgame.Concepts....................................................71 . 4. Equilibrium.Plays................................................................89 . 5. Kill.Phil:.The.Next.Generation..........................................105 . 6. Prize.Pools.and.Equities....................................................115 . 7. Specific.Strategies.for.Different.Tournament.Types.........149 . 8. Short-Handed.and.Heads-Up.Play...................................179 . 9. Detailed.Analysis.of.a.Professional.SNG..........................205 Part Three—Other Topics .10. Adjustments.to.Recent.Changes.in.No-Limit Hold.’Em.Tournaments....................................................231 .11. Tournament.Luck..............................................................241 -
Online Poker Statistics Guide a Comprehensive Guide for Online Poker Players
Online Poker Statistics Guide A comprehensive guide for online poker players This guide was created by a winning poker player on behalf of Poker Copilot. Poker Copilot is a tool that automatically records your opponents' poker statistics, and shows them onscreen in a HUD (head-up display) while you play. Version 2. Updated April, 2017 Table of Contents Online Poker Statistics Guide 5 Chapter 1: VPIP and PFR 5 Chapter 2: Unopened Preflop Raise (UOPFR) 5 Chapter 3: Blind Stealing 5 Chapter 4: 3-betting and 4-betting 6 Chapter 5: Donk Bets 6 Chapter 6: Continuation Bets (cbets) 6 Chapter 7: Check-Raising 7 Chapter 8: Squeeze Bet 7 Chapter 9: Big Blinds Remaining 7 Chapter 10: Float Bets 7 Chapter 1: VPIP and PFR 8 What are VPIP and PFR and how do they affect your game? 8 VPIP: Voluntarily Put In Pot 8 PFR: Preflop Raise 8 The relationship between VPIP and PFR 8 Identifying player types using VPIP/PFR 9 VPIP and PFR for Six-Max vs. Full Ring 10 Chapter 2: Unopened Preflop Raise (UOPFR) 12 What is the Unopened Preflop Raise poker statistic? 12 What is a hand range? 12 What is a good UOPFR for beginners from each position? 12 How to use Equilab hand charts 13 What about the small and big blinds? 16 When can you widen your UOPFR range? 16 Flat calling using UOPFR 16 Flat calling with implied odds 18 Active players to your left reduce your implied odds 19 Chapter 3: Blind Stealing 20 What is a blind steal? 20 Why is the blind-stealing poker statistic important? 20 Choosing a bet size for a blind steal 20 How to respond to a blind steal -
Identifying Player's Strategies in No Limit Texas Hold'em Poker Through
EPIA'2011 ISBN: 978-989-95618-4-7 Identifying Player’s Strategies in No Limit Texas Hold’em Poker through the Analysis of Individual Moves Luís Filipe Teófilo and Luís Paulo Reis Departamento de Engenharia Informática, Faculdade de Engenharia da Universidade do Porto, Portugal Laboratório de Inteligência Artificial e de Ciência de Computadores, Universidade do Porto, Portugal [email protected], [email protected] Abstract. The development of competitive artificial Poker playing agents has proven to be a challenge, because agents must deal with unreliable information and deception which make it essential to model the opponents in order to achieve good results. This paper presents a methodology to develop opponent modeling techniques for Poker agents. The approach is based on applying clustering algorithms to a Poker game database in order to identify player types based on their actions. First, common game moves were identified by clustering all players’ moves. Then, player types were defined by calculating the frequency with which the players perform each type of movement. With the given dataset, 7 different types of players were identified with each one having at least one tactic that characterizes him. The identification of player types may improve the overall performance of Poker agents, because it helps the agents to predict the opponent’s moves, by associating each opponent to a distinct cluster. Keywords: Poker, Clustering, Opponent Modeling, Expectation-maximization 1 Introduction Poker is a game that is became a field of interest for the AI research community on the last decade. This game presents a radically different challenge when compared to other games like chess or checkers. -
Poker Math That Matters Simplifying the Secrets of No-Limit Hold’Em
Poker Math That Matters Simplifying the Secrets of No-Limit Hold’em _______________ By Owen Gaines Poker Math That Matters Copyright © 2010 by Owen Gaines Published by Owen Gaines All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means without written permission from the author. To request to use any part of this book in any way, write to: [email protected] To order additional copies, visit www.qtippoker.com ISBN-13: 978-0-615-39745-0 ISBN-10: 0-615-39745-X Printed in the United States of America iv Table of Contents Acknowledgements .................................................................. viii About Owen Gaines .................................................................... x About this Book ........................................................................... 1 Introduction ................................................................................. 3 Why Math Matters ................................................................... 3 Quiz ..................................................................................... 6 Measurements .............................................................................. 9 Your Surroundings .................................................................. 9 Quiz ................................................................................... 14 Thinking About Bets in No-Limit Hold'em ........................... 15 Quiz ................................................................................... 17 Your -
Jonathan Little's Poker Cash Game Cheatsheet
Jonathan Little’s Poker Cash Game Cheat Sheet • Think about the action on every street of • If you have a bad memory, write the notes in a • Against players who play too many hands too every hand before you act. notebook. aggressively: • Do NOT play robotically. • Take notes on what each specific player does o Realize they often have marginal hands even when they apply pressure. • Don’t play the same generic style all the incorrectly. time. • Always put your opponent on a RANGE OF HANDS o Realize that if you induce them to bluff, do not fold decently strong holdings. • Adjust your strategy to exploit your specific rather than a specific hand. opponents. • Value bet when you think you have the best hand most o Be willing to bluff often because they will usually fold if you apply aggression. • Exploit your opponents’ tendencies. of the time AND you think your opponent will call with many weaker hands. o Bluff them on scary boards. • Raise with a different range based on the effective stack size. • Value bet relatively weak made hands on the turn • Against players who play too few hands too against loose players/calling stations who rarely fold passively: • When calling a raise, ensure you are any made hand or draw. getting at least 10:1 implied odds with o Relentlessly steal their blinds. • Do NOT value bet when you think you have the best small pocket pairs and 20:1 with suited o Fold to their aggression. connectors. hand most of the time and you think your opponent will fold most hands that you beat. -
Models of Strategic Deficiency and Poker
Models of Strategic Deficiency and Poker Gabe Chaddock, Marc Pickett, Tom Armstrong, and Tim Oates University of Maryland, Baltimore County (UMBC) Computer Science and Electrical Engineering Department {gac1, marc}@coral-lab.org and {arm1, oates}@umbc.edu Abstract Opponent modeling has been identified recently as a crit- ical component in the development of an expert level poker Since Emile Borel’s study in 1938, the game of poker has player (Billings et al. 2003). Because the game tree in resurfaced every decade as a test bed for research in mathe- Texas Hold’em, a popular variant of poker, is so large, it is matics, economics, game theory, and now a variety of com- currently infeasible to enumerate the game states, let alone puter science subfields. Poker is an excellent domain for AI research because it is a game of imperfect information and compute an optimal solution. By using various abstraction a game where opponent modeling can yield virtually unlim- methods, the game state has been reduced but a subopti- ited complexity. Recent strides in poker research have pro- mal player is not good enough. In addition to hidden in- duced computer programs that can outplay most intermediate formation, there is misinformation. Part of the advanced players, but there is still a significant gap between computer poker player’s repertoire is the ability to bluff. Bluffing programs and human experts due to the lack of accurate, pur- is the deceptive practice of playing a weak hand as if it poseful opponent models. We present a method for construct- were strong. Indeed there are some subtle bluffing practices ing models of strategic deficiency, that is, an opponent model where a strong hand is played as a weak one early in the hand with an inherent roadmap for exploitation. -
POKER the Ultimate BOOK
olo.éditions 115 rue d’Aboukir 75002 paris - [email protected] ULTIMATE BOOKS THE ORIGINS OF CARDS “Closed poker” is the historiCal version he most distant ancestor of playing cards of poker. it was the most praCtiCed form seems to be ancient chips of wood used in of poker in the 1830s, when the game took The two players seated The players, having The players still in the China to write down dice toss results. on the name poker for good. it had many to the left of the dealer called the first bets, get game show their cards, As early as the thirteenth century in the variations, and bluffing and ChanCe played (called blinders) place a rid of the cards in their starting with the last T bet right off. Each player hand they deem useless raiser (bettor). The Middle East, players made their own cards from all kinds predominant roles. receives five cards, one (between zero and player to lay down the of materials. Drawing on traditional methods, they would at a time, and looks at four cards). The dealer best hand wins the cut out thick pieces of paper, fabric, leather, or papyrus his hand. Then comes replaces them with pot. If only one player the first betting round. an equivalent number remains, he wins the pot POKER and paint figures on them directly or with a stencil. Each player, when it is of cards. The second without even showing his turn, makes a bet. betting round begins. his cards. But it was Johannes Gutenberg and his development of movable printing “Special” cardS around 1450 that account for cards be- At first, the cardboard used for cards was poor in quality.