Book of Abstracts 1 2016 Ghent, Belgium Child in the City
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Child in the City BOOK OF ABSTRACTS 7, 8, 9 November 2016 Ghent, Belgium Conference - Book of Abstracts 1 2016 Ghent, Belgium Child in the City Abstracts by Speaker Mr. Kadriye Akdemir Asisstant Professor, PhD Bahar Aksel PhD Student Bruno Amaral de Andrade Ms. Swathika Anandan Assist. Prof. Dr. Sebla Arin Ms Francesca Arras Professor Simon Atkinson Ms. Sruthi Atmakur-Javdekar Mr Samir Bakhet Professor David Ball Dr. Ayşenur / Bahar Baş / Aksel MSc Felix Bentlin Mrs. Simone Bommeljé Mr. Thibalt Bonte Mrs Ine Bosmans Bosmans Lecturer Dr. Melih Bozkurt Mrs Katie Cadman Mr. Raf Canters Mrs. Chiara Carlucci Ms. Claire Casey Miss Karen Claes Miss Fanny Claeys Mrs Caroline Claus Miss. Adriana Cordeiro Mrs. Hanne Daniels Head of project Ms. Fariba Daryani Ms. Helen Davidson Mrs. Greet De Lathauwer Mrs. Marieke De Munck Director Jan Deduytsche Dr. Martine France Delfos Conference - Book of Abstracts 2 2016 Ghent, Belgium Child in the City Drs. Malou Durve Mrs. Swarna Dutt Ms MRes, Claire Edwards BA Hons Mrs. Nuha Eltinay Ms Krisztina Emrich Mrs Cherie Enns Professor Abdelfattah EZZINE Carlo Fabian Mrs. Jeanette Fich Jespersen Ms Johanna France Mr Tim Gill MD, PhD Josip Grgurić Mrs. Katarina Gustafson Mrs. Froukje Hajer MA Katja Hausleitner MD. Marija Hegedu Jungvirth š Ms Marguerite Hunter Blair Dr Märit Jansson Jing Jing PhD Tanja Joelsson Dr. Margaret Kernan Ir. Marjan Ketner Prof. Dr. Isami Kinoshita Mrs. Funda Kocaarslan Mrs. Anne Koning Mrs. Lina Kusaite, Mrs. Marianne Labre Mrs Lois Lawn Annie Lens Mrs. Annie Lens Mr Andy Lloyd Mr. Frederico Lopes Mr. Toon Luypaert Ms Magdelena Madden Mr. Ruda Mahmud Conference - Book of Abstracts 3 2016 Ghent, Belgium Child in the City Drs. Jodi Mak Mrs Marianne Mannello Ms Bahar- Julie Manouchehri- Rudner Mr Keith McAllister Miss Laura McDonald Dr. Johan Meire Mrs Helena Menezes Dr. Carme Montserrat Miss Marjan Moris Dr Rose Mugweni MA Trudi Nederland Prof Lucia Nucci Ing. Elske Oost Mrs Ruth Parker Mrs. Rita Passemiers Ana-Maria Patroi Post. Doc. Lise Specht Petersen Ing.arch. Mirjana / Lenka Petrik / Burgerova Mrs Vicky Pettens Mrs. Imke Pichal Miss ALKISTIS PITSIKALI Marc-André Plante, Director general Ms Priyanka Prasad PhD Isabel Preto IRENE QUINTÁNS Ms. Giulia Raimondi Dipl.-Ing. Dajana Rokvic Tine Rommens Miss Wulan Suci Sakti Rony Mrs Lenny Rosalin Ms Pippa Rowcliffe Mr. Hari Sacré Prof. Osamu Sakuma, Architect Ilaria Salvadori Ms Kirsty Saunders Conference - Book of Abstracts 4 2016 Ghent, Belgium Child in the City Mr. Lech Schelfout Anneleen Schelstraete Wim Seghers Dr.Yucel Severcan Mrs Yao Shen Assoc. Prof. Dr. Hikmet Sivri Gökmen Miss Snoeck Mayor Tunc Soyer Zeno Steuri Ms Tanny Stobart Mrs. Shabira Sultana Ms Sabina / Divya Suri / Jindal Ms. Toko Uchida Mrs Danielle van Kalmthout Dr Lieselotte van Leeuwen Drs. Patrick van Lunteren Mrs Els Vandenbroeck Mr. Wouter Vanderstede Ms Eva Vandevivere Miss Annelies Vaneycken Mr. Francis Vaningelgem Mr Hannes Vanmeenen Dr Raf Verbruggen Mrs. Olenka Villarreal Mr Adrian Voce Dipl.-Ing. Petra Völkl Mrs Maria von Bredow Ms Ellen Weaver Dhr. Margriet Wiersma Ms Jenny Wood Ms Helen Woolley Dr. Rick Worch Asst. Prof. Meryem Yalcin Mrs Kurniasih (Nia ) Zulhadji Conference - Book of Abstracts 5 2016 Ghent, Belgium Child in the City Conference - Book of Abstracts 6 2016 Ghent, Belgium Child in the City Mr. Kadriye Akdemir Hacettepe University, Turkey The Playgrounds in Ankara and Risky Play "Children begin to take risks even when they are babies. These risks can be seen while crawling, making something that has not experienced before, pushing the limits to overcome from fears (Jones, 2012;Stephenson, 2010). However, sometimes children can use the materials in a dangerous way when they are bored. Situations like this can make some harms for children. It happens because environments that children use are excessively protective and safe (Wallsh,1993; Özgüner & Şahin, 2009). However, environments that involve risky play let children to feel excitement, to trust their own judgements, to respect their abilities, to know their limits, to understand the effects of their acts, to help others, to defend independence, to keep themlselves heatlh both physcially and mentally (Ungar, 2010; Knight, 2012, as cited in Kalburan, 2014). In the less protective environment, the play types which give children excitement and have possibility to hurt but are not life-threatining are called as risky play(Play SafetyForum, 2013). According to research, children prefer some playground which involves some materials include speed and height (Beate& Sandseter,2009; Stephenson, 2010). In terms of these information, the purpose of this study is to investigate the effectiveness of playground in Ankara in terms of providing risky play and supporting taking risk skills. To do this,eight playground in Ankara were observed by taking photos and notes. Also, Playground Rating System which was developed by Frost,Wortham and Reifel in 2001 was used to determine the feautes of playgournd. It is found that generally the playground in Ankara is traditional and they do not support the risky play." Conference - Book of Abstracts 7 2016 Ghent, Belgium Child in the City Asisstant Professor, PhD Bahar Aksel Mimar Sinan Fine Arts University, Turkey Dealing with Diverse Urban Scapes for Developing a Child-friendly Environment: The Case of Istanbul "With its 15 million inhabitants, Istanbul is the most crowded city of Turkey. Istanbul is the main destination for international investments, urban development and employment as well as being the main center for high quality public services such as education and health care. Transformation of Istanbul started in 1980’s with the migrations from Anatolia, that affected population density, industry / services balance and urban structure dramatically. Squatter houses appeared for the first time as the settlements of new comers. After 2000 local government spotted Istanbul as the new investment capital in its region and started to construct a global city with its high-rise buildings, highways and bridges. Gated communities in the outskirts of the city became most popular residential areas especially for families with children. After 2010 central areas of the city also started to regenerate as residential blocks / skyscrapers targeted the families that prefer urban lifestyle. Eventually, city had diverse population, life styles and urban environment. While all the development agenda focused on constructions; public services such as sport facilities, open public spaces, parks and playgrounds had the secondary role. As the main target group for this new city scape is the adults who have the financial power to afford this new city life, youngsters are not in the scene or only titled after the playground areas. Even though the local government runs many large-scale projects for open public spaces or state set standards for open spaces / facilities for residential areas, they are mostly repetitions of the same format and poor in answering the needs of the specific sites. On the other hand neighborhoods with different economical and social backgrounds have different levels of public space quality. Public spaces (as socialization and gathering environments) are even more important in cities that face a vast transformation. These spaces are crucial for developing interaction between people for the sustainability of the collective memory, common values and active citizenship (especially for the young residents/owners of the city). An overview on Istanbul shows peripheral neighborhoods Sultanbeyli, Arnavutköy and Başakşehir have the most crowded children population; which are developed after 1990’s. Central neighborhoods Beşiktaş, Bakırköy and Şişli are less crowded in the means of children. Though all neighborhoods have various urban patterns within their boundaries. After describing Istanbul according to the urbanization history, economic and educational levels, percentage of children in population growth, public investments and facilities related to children, projects of local governments for child friendly cities; districts will be categorized as old / new, traditional / modern, central / periphery, gated community / ordinary neighborhoods for defining advantageous / disadvantageous neighborhood typologies. Different urban patterns of chosen districts will be analyzed in detail for developing a comparative approach. Determining different conditions of physical environment, quality of cityscape, parks and facilities, public spaces will help defining diverse levels of needs in Istanbul for creating effective, child-friendly, youth-oriented built urban areas that would Conference - Book of Abstracts 8 2016 Ghent, Belgium Child in the City integrate children to their living environment and effect positively for being a citizen." Conference - Book of Abstracts 9 2016 Ghent, Belgium Child in the City PhD Student Bruno Amaral de Andrade Federal University of Minas Gerais, Brasil The Italian Territorialist Approach towards a “città bambina”: uncovering the methodological steps to identify heritage values in a Germanic migrant-based settlement in Brasil The territorialist approach, that works on the concept of a local sustainable development, revisit on critical manner classic authors such as Patrick Geddes and Lewis Mumford to reflect about the relation that can be stablished or not between the children and the territorial heritage (long term structures) towards urban planning. In the 1990 decade, the territorialist endogenous approach, what we are calling città bambina,