LISBON VALLEY URANIUM PROJECT Lisbon Valley, San Juan County, Utah, USA

TECHNICAL REPORT FORM 43-101F1

FOR BZU Minerals Ltd. and Fintry Enterprises Inc.

October 12, 2005

Prepared by:

Bill R. Fleshman

(C.P. Geol. AusIMM) 107342

16025 Edmands Dr.

Reno, NV 89511

775-219-5791

1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...... 1 2.0 INTRODUCTION AND TERMS OF REFERENCE...... 2 2.1 PURPOSE OF THE REPORT ...... 2 2.2 GENERAL ...... 2 2.3 UNITS AND CURRENCY...... 3 2.4 TERMS AND DEFINITIONS...... 3 2.5 SOURCES OF INFORMATION ...... 3 3.0 DISCLAIMER...... 3 4.0 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION...... 4 4.1 LOCATION...... 4 4.2 DESCRIPTION ...... 5 4.3 CLAIMS...... 7 4.4 STATE LEASES...... 11 5.0 ACCESSIBILITY, CLIMATE, LOCAL RESOURCES, INFRASTRUCTURE AND PHYSIOGRAPHY...... 12 5.1 ACCESS...... 12 5.2 CLIMATE AND PHYSIOGRAPHY...... 12 5.3 LOCAL RESOURCES AND INFRASTRUCTURE...... 13 6.0 HISTORY...... 14 7.0 GEOLOGIC SETTING...... 17 7.1 REGIONAL GEOLOGY...... 17 7.2 PROJECT GEOLOGY...... 17 8.0 DEPOSIT TYPES...... 23 9.0 MINERALIZATION ...... 28 10.0 EXPLORATION...... 29 11.0 TARGET AREAS...... 29 12.0 DRILLING...... 32 13.0 SAMPLE METHOD AND APPROACH...... 32 14.0 SAMPLE PREPARATION, ANALYSES AND SECURITY ...... 33 15.0 DATA VERIFICATION...... 33 16.0 ADJACENT PROPERTIES...... 33 17.0 MINERAL PROCESSING AND METALLURGICAL TESTING...... 33 18.0 MINERAL RESOURCE AND MINERAL RESERVE ESTIMATES...... 33

19.0 OTHER RELEVENT DATA AND INFORMATION………………………....31

20.0 INTERPRETATION AND CONCLUSIONS…………………………………31

21.0 RECOMMENDATIONS……………………………………………………….34

REFERENCES………………………………………………………………...35

CERTIFICATE OF QUALIFIED PERSON………..………………………...36

Lisbon Valley Uranium Project Page ii Technical Report

List of Figures Figure 1 Location of the Lisbon Valley Uranium Project…………………………....4

Figure 2 Location map showing claims and leases…………………………….……6

Figure 3 Location map northeast area claims………………………………….…….8

Figure 4 Location map northwest area claims……………………………….………9

Figure 5 Location map southwest area claims….………………………….………10

Figure 6 Location map for mineral leases………………………………….………11

Figure 7 Lisbon Valley looking north, gray-green Chinle caps red Cutler………13

Figure 8 Lisbon Valley industrial activity……………………………………………14

Figure 9 Known drill holes in the principal target area…………………………….15

Figure 10 Historic mines within or adjacent to Property Boundary………………16

Figure 11 Geologic map of the Lisbon Valley (created from UGS Map 205 Helmut Doelling 2004)………………………………………………………………………….18

Figure 12 Stratigraphic Section (Wood, 1968)………………….………..…..…….19

Figure 13 Geologic cross-section across the Lisbon Valley Anticline (modified from Weir, 1981)……………………...…………………………………….………….20

Figure 14 Bouger gravity map of the Lisbon Valley (USGS Professional Paper 316, Plate 7)……………………………………………………………………………22

Figure 15 Looking east in Steen’s Canyon, near the Mi Vida Mine. Cliffs of tan Wingate sandstone caps gray-green Chinle Formation…….……….…………….24

Figure 16 Lisbon Valley Historical Uranium Production 1948 - 1988....………....25

Figure 17 Early Uranium Production………………….……………………………..26

Figure 18 Uraninite ore from the Mi Vida Mine..……………………………………29

Figure 19 Northern headframe of the Lisbon Mine 1970……………….…………30

Figure 20 Underground operations at the Lisbon Mine 1970………………..……30

Lisbon Valley Uranium Project Page iii Technical Report

Figure 21 Lisbon Valley Mineral Belt and conceptual target.………………..……31

Figure 22 Generalized cross-section showing known uranium associated with the Lisbon anticline and conceptual targets on down dropped block…………....32

List of Tables

Table 1 Unit Conversions………………………………………………………………3 Table 2 List of claims and quantities……………………………….…………………7 Table 3 List of State leases……………………………………………………..……11 Table 4 Known Historical Uranium Production within Property...... …….15 Table 5 Lisbon Valley Production Data 1948-1970……………………….……….24 Table 6 Exploration Budget Estimate…………..………………………...…………34

APPENDICES

Appendix A: Mining Claim Filing Dates and Recordation Data…………….……37

Lisbon Valley Uranium Project Page iv Technical Report

1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Lisbon Valley project is located in the Lisbon Valley Mining District, also known as the Big Indian Mining District, approximately 35 miles (56 kilometers) south of the town of Moab in San Juan County, Utah near the Colorado state line. A paved two lane highway runs essentially north to south through the length of the valley and provides access the newly developed Lisbon Valley Copper Mine owned by Constellation Copper, adjacent to the southern portions of the project. Access on the property is good, on numerous unimproved dirt roads and trails that are used for servicing oil and gas wells in the area. Local infrastructure is good, the towns of Moab and Monticello, 35 miles (56 kilometers) north and 20 miles (32 kilometers) southwest, respectively, provide services. The Lisbon Valley Project is composed of 16,640 acres (6,735 hectares) and was acquired by BZU Holdings, Inc., a Nevada Corporation. BZU Holdings, Inc. is a wholly-owned subsidiary of BZU Minerals Ltd., a British Columbia company. BZU Minerals Ltd. and its shareholders have entered into an agreement with Fintry Enterprises Inc. (“Fintry”), a British Columbia company listed on the TSX Venture Exchange pursuant to which Fintry has agreed to acquire the mineral claims and leases comprising the Lisbon Valley Uranium Project which are the subject of this Technical Report. Bill Fleshman was retained by BZU Holdings, Inc. as a consulting geologist to complete a technical report on behalf of BZU Minerals Ltd. and Fintry on the Lisbon Valley Uranium Project in Lisbon Valley, San Juan County, Utah, USA. Mr. Fleshman, a qualified person as defined by National Instrument 43-101, conducted a site visit over a three-day period from July 6 to July 8, 2005. This technical report will be used as a disclosure document by BZU Minerals Ltd. and Fintry during the reverse takeover of Fintry by BZU Minerals Ltd.

The dominant geologic feature of the Lisbon Valley is the Lisbon Valley anticline, a salt anticline typical of the Paradox Basin. Subsequent to doming the anticline was faulted by the Lisbon Valley fault, a northwest trending normal fault along the longitudinal axis of the anticline, with maximum displacement of over 3,000 feet (914 meters) at the crest and approximately 2,500 feet (762 meters) at the northwestern and southeastern ends. Horst and graben blocks are common along the fault and are most prevalent at each end of the anticline. The total stratigraphic section within the Lisbon Valley anticline measures over 11,000 feet (3,353 meters) in thickness. Sedimentary rocks deposited during Pennsylvanian, Permian, Triassic, Jurassic, Cretaceous and Quaternary time are exposed in the Lisbon Valley anticline area.

Uranium deposits are known to occur in three formations located in the Lisbon Valley (Figure 12). (1) The Moss Back member of the Chinle Formation is the most significant in terms of past production and future targets on the east side of the Lisbon Valley Fault. (2) Morrison Formation (Salt Wash member), and (3) the Cutler Formation. Lekas and Dahl (1956) and earlier Steen (1953) noted that the deposits occur in a limited range of elevations between the 6,000 and 6,700 feet

Lisbon Valley Uranium Project Page 1 Technical Report

(1,829 and 2,042 meters) contours in the northern half of the ore belt in a curving line around the Lisbon Valley anticline and is suggestive of a genetic relationship between the anticlinal structure and the uranium deposits.

The principal target is based upon the concept that uranium deposits occur on the down dropped, northeast block of the Lisbon Valley fault as suggested by Wood (1968). The discovery of the Lisbon Mine, by far the most productive mine in the district producing over 18 million pounds of U3O8, bolsters the concept. The concept assumes the deposits are genetically related to the Lisbon Valley anticline and that deposits were formed in a more or less uniform arc around the anticline. Until the actual targets on the Property are tested they must be considered conceptual. Many factors impacting the localization of the deposits are still not determined.

BZU Holdings, Inc. has not carried out any exploration on the Property.

From a review of all work done in the district it is concluded that excellent potential exists for further discovery of economic deposits along the down dropped, northeast block of the Lisbon Valley fault. The property covers an extensive area underlain by known ore-bearing formations.

It is recommended that a multi-phase drilling program be implemented consisting of reverse circulation and core drilling where appropriate. The first phase should consist of drilling 45,000 feet (13,716 meters) in 15 holes to establish stratigraphic and structural control. Each hole should be geologically and radiometrically logged and samples collected and submitted for analysis in the Morrison, Chinle and Cutler formations. Core should be taken to establish well control for contacts and facies mapping to aid subsequent drill targets.

2.0 INTRODUCTION AND TERMS OF REFERENCE

2.1 PURPOSE OF THE REPORT Bill Fleshman has been asked by BZU Holdings, Inc. to review previous work and to make a site visit to prepare this report in compliance with the National Instrument 43-101 regulations. This report follows the layout and format for technical reports as described in Form 43-101F1. Mr. Fleshman visited the project area on July 6 - 8, 2005.

The purpose of this report is to review the geology, mineralization and previous work to make recommendations for further work to advance the project.

2.2 GENERAL The Lisbon Valley Project is composed of 16,640 acres (6,735 hectares) primarily along the northeast flank of the Lisbon Valley anticline. The property was acquired through the staking of United States federal unpatented mining

Lisbon Valley Uranium Project Page 2 Technical Report claims and the leasing of Utah state land beginning in October 2004 through June 2005.

2.3 UNITS AND CURRENCY All measurements are in imperial units with the corresponding metric units followed in parentheses. Uranium content is expressed as %U3O8. Dollar amounts are in United States dollars. The projection for the maps used in this report is Universal Transverse Mercator, Zone 12 using the 1927 North American datum.

2.4 TERMS AND DEFINITIONS USD refers to United States Dollar. USGS refers United States Geological Survey. BLM refers to United States Bureau of Land Management. UGS refers to the Utah Geological Survey.

Table 1 Unit Conversions

Unit Metric Equivalent 1 foot 0.2048 meters 1 inch 2.54 centimeters 1 acre 0.4047 hectare 1 mile 1.61 kilometers

2.5 SOURCES OF INFORMATION This report is based on geological reports, maps, published government reports and public information as listed in the “References” section at the conclusion of this report.

The author has assumed that all of the information and technical documents listed in the “Reference” section are accurate and complete in all material respects.

3.0 DISCLAIMER In preparing this document, the author did not check the title to the claims with the State of Utah or the U.S. Federal Government as the author is not qualified to validate the legal ownership of the property and herby disclaims any responsibility for such matters.

The author is unaware of any existing technical data other than those published reports listed in the references that were provided to him by BZU Holdings, Inc.

There are no known environmental liabilities associated with the project.

Lisbon Valley Uranium Project Page 3 Technical Report

4.0 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION

4.1 LOCATION The Lisbon Valley project is located in Lisbon Valley approximately 35 miles (56 kilometers) south of the town of Moab in San Juan County, Utah near the Colorado state line (Figure 1). The claims and leases are located within Township 29 South through Township 30 South and Range 23 East through Range 26 East, Salt Lake Meridian.

Figure 1 Location of the Lisbon Valley Uranium Project.

Lisbon Valley Uranium Project Page 4 Technical Report

4.2 DESCRIPTION Claims and state leases of the Lisbon Valley project (Figure 2) cover an area of approximately 16,640 acres (6,735 hectares). Unpatented United States federal mining claims cover 11,124 acres (4,502 hectares) and are held by BZU Holdings, Inc. incorporated in Nevada. Utah state mineral leases cover 5,517 acres (2,233 hectares) and are held by BZU Holdings, Inc.

Claims and leases are contiguous in the area of the principal target area located in Township 29 South, Range 24 East, Township 29 South, Range 25 East and Township 30 South, Range 24 East, consisting of 10,450 acres (4,229 hectares). The state leases have an 8% gross value royalty; there are no royalties covering the federal mining claims. Holding costs for the unpatented mining claims include an annual maintenance payment of $125.00 per claim payable to the BLM, the claims can be held as long as these payments are made. The annual holding costs for the state leases are $5517.00 or $1 per acre. Each lease is for a term of ten years and may be extended.

Appendix A lists individual mining claim filing dates and recordation data.

Further work on the property will require permitting which is expected to be uncomplicated as the area is considered an industrial area. Encana Oil and Gas is currently drilling several gas exploration holes adjacent to the project in Township 29 South, Range 25 East and encountered no difficulties in obtaining permits.

No land alienation for parks or special management zones is indicated on current USGS or BLM maps.

Lisbon Valley Uranium Project Page 5 Technical Report

Figure 2 Location map showing claims and leases.

Lisbon Valley Uranium Project Page 6 Technical Report

4.3 CLAIMS Table 2 List of claims and quantities.

CLAIM NAME QUANTITY X1 - X7 7 Y1 - Y85 85 Z1 - Z129 129 LO1 - LO14 14 RM1 - RM16 16 R148 - R178 29 FR10 1 R1 - R89 54 VIDA1 - VIDA2 2 TH 10 EA1 - EA20 20 LMW1 - 6, 8,10,12-17 14 R90 - R134 28 HILO1 - HILO2 2 TED1 - 4, 7 - 8 6 TOM1 - TOM22 22 V1 - V10 10 LM1 - LM26 26 A1 - A2, 4 - 20 19 B1 - B3, 5 - 18, 21 - 32 29 T1 - T7 7 P1 - P20 20 V1 - V20 20 G1 - G20 20 H1 - H5 5 L1 - L10 10 TOTAL 605

Lisbon Valley Uranium Project Page 7 Technical Report

Figure 3 Location map northeast area claims.

Lisbon Valley Uranium Project Page 8 Technical Report

Figure 4 Location map northwest area claims.

Lisbon Valley Uranium Project Page 9 Technical Report

Figure 5 Location map southwest area claims.

Lisbon Valley Uranium Project Page 10 Technical Report

4.4 STATE LEASES Table 3 List of State leases.

LEASE NUMBER ACRES ML 49583 640 ML 49702 1357 ML 49707 1440 ML 49708 960 ML 49710 320 ML 49722 640 ML 49948 160

Figure 6 Location map showing mineral leases.

Lisbon Valley Uranium Project Page 11 Technical Report

5.0 ACCESSIBILITY, CLIMATE, LOCAL RESOURCES, INFRASTRUCTURE AND PHYSIOGRAPHY

5.1 ACCESS The northern portion of the main property is adjacent to a paved two lane highway which runs essentially north to south through the length of the valley and provides access to the newly developed Lisbon Valley Copper Mine owned by Constellation Copper, adjacent to the southern portions of the project. Access within the property is good, on numerous unimproved dirt roads and trails that are used for servicing oil and gas wells in the area.

5.2 CLIMATE AND PHYSIOGRAPHY Lisbon Valley is one of the many north-west-trending stream valleys formed along salt anticlines in the Paradox Basin of the Colorado Plateau. The project area covers approximately 26 square miles (67 square kilometers) with elevations ranging from 6,000 feet (1,828 meters) to a high of 7,000 feet (2,133 meters).

The semiarid climate of the Lisbon Valley area (Figure 7) is characterized by large daily and yearly ranges in temperature and a total annual precipitation of about 10 to 15 inches (25 to 38 centimeters), mostly as sporadic, intense thundershowers typical of the high desert Colorado Plateau. Snow is infrequent at altitudes below 6,500 feet (1,981 meters) and usually melts in a few days. Weather conditions pose not inhibition to year round work on the property. Vegetation in the project area consists of sagebrush, juniper and pinyon in the hills and slopes while desert grasses and sagebrush sparsely cover the Lisbon Valley floor.

Lisbon Valley Uranium Project Page 12 Technical Report

Figure 7 Lisbon Valley looking north; gray-green Chinle caps red Cutler.

5.3 LOCAL RESOURCES AND INFRASTRUCTURE Several resource projects are active in the area, principally the Lisbon Valley Copper Project owned by Constellation Copper expected to be in production in August 2005. A limestone quarry, oil and gas collection terminals and pipelines, oil and gas drilling and ranching are also ongoing in the project area (Figure 8). Electrical lines provide power to these instillations and various wells provide water.

The towns of Moab and Monticello, 35 miles (35 kilometers) north and 20 miles (32 kilometers) southwest, respectively, provide services. A labor pool of mining and milling personnel exists in the region. The nearest airport is in Grand Junction Colorado, approximately 130 road miles (209 kilometers) from the project area.

International Uranium operates the White Mesa uranium mill near Blanding Utah, approximately 50 road miles south of Lisbon Valley.

Lisbon Valley Uranium Project Page 13 Technical Report

Figure 8 Lisbon Valley industrial activity.

6.0 HISTORY

In the principal target area located in Township 29 South, Range 24 East, Township 29 South, Range 25 East and Township 30 South, Range 24 East there are twelve holes that have been mapped on USGS topographic maps, six of which are within the property in an area of approximately four square miles (Figure 9). The drill holes targeted the Cutler and Hermosa Formations at depths of 5,000 to 7,000 feet (1,524 to 2,134 meters), results of this drilling is unknown to the author. Any previous work appears to be limited to these holes. The previous ownership of the area is unknown by the author.

The BZU property encompasses minor portions of six of the historical mines of the district - the North Alice Mine, the Alice Mine, the E. L. Cord Mine, the Reprise Mine, the Texwood Mine and the Louise Mine (Figure 10). Production totals for the mines is incomplete, Table 4 lists available production data for the mines which fall inside the property boundary.

Lisbon Valley Uranium Project Page 14 Technical Report

Figure 9 Known drill holes in the principal target area.

Table 4 Known Historical Uranium Production within the Property.

Mine Pounds U3O8 Reprise 295,000 North Alice 2,500,000 Cord 4,400,000

Lisbon Valley Uranium Project Page 15 Technical Report

Lisbon Valley Fault

Lisbon Valley Anticline

Figure 10 Historic mines within or adjacent to the Property Boundary.

Lisbon Valley Uranium Project Page 16 Technical Report

6.1 RECENT WORK Recent geologic mapping was done by the UGS, Map 205 by Helmut Doelling in 2004, prior to this there have been several maps and reports dating from the 1950’s to the 1970’s, some of which are in the references section. BZU has done no exploration work on the property.

7.0 GEOLOGIC SETTING

7.1 REGIONAL GEOLOGY The Lisbon Valley is located near the center of the Colorado Plateau, within the Paradox Basin, a major northwest trending structural depression with a succession of sedimentary rocks and salt deposits. Subsidence in the Paradox Basin began in the late Pennsylvanian Period and continued through most of the Mesozoic. The resulting Paradox Formation evaporite deposits at the bottom of the basin section are known to be in excess of 5,000 feet (1,524 meter) thick. Subsequent to deposition, the evaporite rocks began to flow to form elongate "salt anticlines" for which the area is best known. The Lisbon Valley anticline is one of the prominent salt anticlines in the Paradox Basin but is unique in that the Pennsylvanian salts did not breach the surface. The northeast side of the anticline has been downthrown during the Laramide Orogeny along the Lisbon Valley fault, more or less parallel to the anticline's axis with additional hanging- wall splays of the fault. The Lisbon Valley fault dips to the northeast and extends southeasterly along strike for approximately 16 miles (25.7 kilometers), with vertical displacement of approximately 3,000 feet (914 meters) at the crest of the anticline. The Lisbon Valley fault juxtaposes Cretaceous rocks northeast of the fault against Pennsylvanian strata on the southwest. Erosion of the anticline, which began in Late Eocene time, removed at least 5,000 feet (1,524 meter) of sediments and exposed Pennsylvanian sediments on the crest of the anticline.

7.2 PROJECT GEOLOGY The dominant geologic feature of the Lisbon Valley is the Lisbon Valley anticline, a salt anticline typical of the Paradox Basin. Subsequent to doming the anticline was faulted by the Lisbon Valley fault, a northwest trending normal fault along the longitudinal axis of the anticline with maximum displacement of over 3,000 feet (914 meters) at the crest and approximately 2,500 feet (762 meters) at the northwestern and southeastern ends (Figure 12). Horst and graben blocks are common along the fault and are most prevalent at each end of the anticline.

Lisbon Valley Uranium Project Page 17 Technical Report

A’

A

Figure 11 Geologic map of the Lisbon Valley (created from UGS Map 205 Helmut Doelling 2004.

The total stratigraphic section within the Lisbon Valley anticline measures over 11,000 feet (3,353 meter) in thickness (Figure 13 and 14). Sedimentary rocks deposited during Pennsylvanian, Permian, Triassic, Jurassic, Cretaceous and Quaternary time are exposed in the Lisbon Valley anticline area. The anticline is unique in that it is not breached and shows remarkable symmetry as displayed by Bouger gravity measurements (Figure 15).

Lisbon Valley Uranium Project Page 18 Technical Report

Figure 12 Stratigraphic Section (Wood, 1968).

Lisbon Valley Uranium Project Page 19 Technical Report

Figure 13 Geologic cross-section across the Lisbon Valley Anticline (modified from Weir, 1981).

Dakota Sandstone Kd: Light-brown sandstone and conglomerate; forms ledges and cliffs; 100 to 200 feet (30 to 60 meters) thick; Cretaceous.

Burro Canyon Formation Kbc: Yellowish brown and gray sandstone, conglomerate and mudstone; forms ledges and cliffs; 80 to 300 feet (24 to 90 meters) thick; Lower Cretaceous.

Brushy Basin Member of Morrison Formation Jmb: Variegated siltstone, mudstone, clay, and lesser amounts of calcareous sandstone and conglomerate, locally with thin lenses of dense limestone; siltstone and mudstone are principally maroon, light purple, grayish red, and light to medium gray; forms gentle slopes and steep rounded hills, locally in steep slopes with slight ledges; 250 to 500 feet (76 to 150 meters) thick; Upper Jurassic.

Salt Wash Member of Morrison Formation Jms: Interbedded lenses of light- brown, white, yellow-gray, and very pale-orange sandstone and medium red- brown and green-gray siltstone and mudstone; has local minor gray limestone and conglomeratic sandstone; sandstone lenses are thick and resistant, siltstone and mudstone form slopes or recesses between sandstone lenses; upper sandstone lens is occasionally mineralized with uranium and vanadium; 190 to 400 feet (58 to 120 meters) thick, thickening to the south; Uranium ore host; Upper Jurassic.

Summerville Formation Jsmt: Most of the Summerville Formation consists of interbedded reddish-brown to light-brown, thin to medium bedded, fine-grained silty sandstone and medium reddish-brown siltstone; 5 to 70 feet (1.5 to 21 meters) thick; Jurassic.

Lisbon Valley Uranium Project Page 20 Technical Report

Slick Rock Member of Entrada Sandstone Ject: Reddish-orange, orangish- brown, and light-gray in faint to obvious color bands; 1 to 4.3 feet (0.3 to 1.3 meter) high cross-bed sets and planar bedding weather into smooth, massive, bare-rock outcrops with few indentations; locally pocked with small holes that follow cross-bedding; slightly to moderately calcareous; 60 to 310 feet (18 to 95 meters) thick, thickening westward; Middle Jurassic.

Dewey Bridge Member of the Carmel Formation Jcd: Prominent red slope to ledgy slope zone between the Entrada and Navajo Sandstones; upper part is typical Dewey Bridge Member and is mostly medium-reddish-brown, moderately sorted, fine-grained sandstone, with white or gray mottled spots and streaks; forms slopes, recesses and ledgy slopes; upper contact with the Slick Rock is undulatory; 20 to 80 feet (6 to 24 meters) thick; Middle Jurassic.

Navajo Sandstone Jn: Pale-yellowish-gray, very light-brown, and pinkish-gray, fine- to medium-grained, massive, cross-bedded sandstone; conspicuously cross bedded with cross-bed sets that range from 5 to 25 feet (1.5 to 7.5 meters) in thickness; contains sparse thin lenses of gray sandy limestone and, near the base, lenses of reddish-brown siltstone; lower contact gradational and intertonguing; forms rounded knobs, buttes, and mesa rims marked by a checkered pattern of grooved cross-strata and weathering joints; 80 to 500 feet (24 to 150 meter)) thick, thinning eastward; Lower Jurassic.

Kayenta Formation Jk: Light-brown, red, and reddish-brown, lenticular, cross- bedded, sandstone’ siltstone and claystone; medium- to thick-bedded, forms thick ledges; locally contains sparse fossil wood and thin beds of pinkish-gray limestone; upper and lower contacts gradational and intertonguing with Wingate- like beds extending 10 to 20 feet (3 to 6 meters)) into the Kayenta Sandstone; 60 to 360 feet (18 to 110 meters) thick; Lower Jurassic.

Wingate Sandstone Jw: Orangish-brown, massive, cross bedded, fine-grained sandstone; grains are mostly sub angular and well-sorted; faintly banded, with few partings; weathers into massive dark-brown vertical to rounded cliffs, generally with bare-rock surfaces; upper contact placed at top of massive cliff and below thick reddish-brown ledges of the Kayenta; 220 to 420 feet (67 to 130 meters) thick; Lower Jurassic, basal beds may be Triassic.

Chinle Formation TRc: Reddish-brown sandstone, siltstone, conglomeratic sandstone, and greenish-gray mudstone; has an upper interval of grayish-red and reddish-brown mudstone and siltstone with subordinate quantities of red lenticular sandstone and mudstone-pebble conglomerate and a lower interval of light colored lenticular sandstone and cobble conglomerate interbedded with subordinate amounts of greenish gray mudstone; sandstones and conglomerates contain sparse silicified and carbonized fossil wood and other plant debris and are locally mineralized with uranium, copper, and iron sulfides; forms a steep slope interrupted by several strong ledges; averaging 400 to 450 (120 to 140

Lisbon Valley Uranium Project Page 21 Technical Report meters); thickness probably affected by Paradox Formation salt movement, thins over salt diapirs, and thickens in rim synclines; Uranium ore host; Upper Triassic.

Cutler Formation Pca: The Cutler unit is a single thick arkosic formation deposited as coalescing alluvial fans on the southwest flank of the Pennsylvanian-Triassic Uncompahgre uplift. Reddish-brown, red, purple, and reddish-orange, locally mottled pale-gray, arkosic and subarkosic sandstone, siltstone, and conglomerate and minor pale-gray limestone; contains thin, locally fossiliferous limestone beds in the lower part of the unit; forms rough slopes, ledges and cliffs; 1,480 feet (450 meters) thick; Uranium ore host; Lower Permian.

Honaker Trail Formation Phu upper Phl lower: gray and brown cherty limestone and dolomite, thin to thick bedded, forms slopes and ledges; 0 to 3,000 feet (0 to 910 meters) thick; Pennsylvanian.

Lisbon Valley Fault

Figure 14 Bouger gravity map of the Lisbon Valley (USGS Professional Paper 316, Plate 7).

Lisbon Valley Uranium Project Page 22 Technical Report

8.0 DEPOSIT TYPES Uranium exploration in the Lisbon Valley is entering its third era of activity. The previous 2 periods of exploration resulted in a series of mines stretching for 16 miles (25.7 kilometers) forming an actuate belt of deposits known as the Lisbon Valley mining district and was previously known as the Big Indian Mining District. Chenoweth (1990) provides a well-documented history of the district including production statistics. An estimated 78 million pounds (35.4 million kilograms) of uranium was produced from 12.7 million tons of ore during the period 1948 to 1988. To put the district into a modern context, at today’s prices of $30.20 USD per pound U3O8, this production would equate to $2.4 (USD) billion dollars.

The first boom period from 1953 to 1961 was spurred on by the post war need for uranium and accentuated by Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) incentive programs to encourage prospecting and discovery of new deposits. The second boom period in the mid 70’s to early 80’s was driven by the need to offset the first energy crises facing the US. During this period the price of uranium increased from $6 dollars per pound to over $40. The Lisbon Valley was an important contributor to the production of uranium during both of these earlier uranium booms.

The earliest reported uranium-vanadium ore discovery was made in 1913, at the south end of Lisbon Valley anticline in outcrops of basal Chinle sandstone (Wood, 1968). Later in 1948 low-grade uranium was discovered and mined in the upper Cutler sandstone in the center of the southwest flank of the anticline. Prompted by the high demand for uranium and incentive rewards from the AEC, exploration activity in the Lisbon Valley area increased rapidly. The host target for the early deposits was the Permian Cutler formation.

In 1952 while targeting the Cutler Formation, Charles Steen drilled into 13 feet (4 meters) of uraninite ore in the basal Chinle formation approximately 100 feet (30.5 meters) above his planned depth into the underlying Cutler formation. Steen began producing from the Mi Vida mine in 1953 (Figure 9). The discovery of uranium in the basal Chinle Formation resulted in a new wave of exploration activity. Following Steen’s discovery a dozen companies began exploring and developing mines in both the Cutler and the Chinle Formations and shipping the ore to Salt Lake City and later to Moab. Companies operating in the Lisbon Valley included the Utex Exploration Company, Standard Uranium, Homestake Mining Company, North American Uranium and Oil Co. and the Lisbon Uranium Corporation. In 1959 five companies, Hidden Splendor, Rio de Oro Uranium,

Lisbon Valley Uranium Project Page 23 Technical Report

Figure 15 Looking east in Steen’s Canyon, near the Mi Vida Mine. Cliffs of tan Wingate sandstone caps gray-green Chinle Formation.

Mountain Mesa Uranium, Radium King Mines and Lisbon Valley Mining, merged into the Atlas Minerals Company, a subsidiary of the Atlas Corporation. Atlas Minerals became a dominant force in the production and exploration for uranium in the valley.

Ore production reached a peak in 1959 (Table 4 and Figure 10). After the AEC halted its incentive programs production from the valley declined rapidly (Figure 11).

Table 5 Lisbon Valley Production Data 1948- 1970.

ORE YEAR TONS lbs U3O8 % U308 1948 888 2,768 0.16 1949 37 244 0.30 1950 31 104 0.17 1951 392 1,361 0.17 1952 537 2,499 0.23 1953 50,957 458,738 0.45

Lisbon Valley Uranium Project Page 24 Technical Report

1954 187,600 1,178,300 0.31 1955 334,122 2,567,695 0.38 1956 502,313 3,666,431 0.36 1957 641,386 5,034,429 0.39 1958 774,911 6,416,891 0.41 1959 814,619 6,687,646 0.41 1960 668,064 4,447,743 0.33 1961 660,018 4,061,834 0.31 1962 439,672 3,891,689 0.44 1963 455,464 4,209,658 0.46 1964 494,048 4,686,113 0.47 1965 167,648 1,327, 241 0.40 1966 70,360 612,597 0.44 1967 141,788 884,559 0.31 1968 266,965 1,254,731 0.23 1969 201,715 828,518 0.21 1970 316,311 1,414,332 0.22 7,189,846 53,636,121 0.37

Figure 16 Early Uranium Production.

Lisbon Valley Uranium Project Page 25 Technical Report

In 1962, at almost the same time that the AEC program was being halted uranium was discovered in the down dropped Chinle formation on the east side of the Lisbon Valley fault at the southern end of the Lisbon Valley Anticline. Mountain Mesa Uranium Company intersected uranium in a deep drilling project in Section 26, Township 30 South, Range 25 East. In 1964 ore on the down dropped side of the fault was confirmed at the Costanza mine in the adjacent Section 35 (Chenoweth, 1990).

Figure 17 Lisbon Valley Historical Uranium Production 1948 - 1988.

Humeca Exploration Company acquired land on the northeast side of the fault and began an exploration program to discover ore on the down dropped side of the Lisbon Valley fault in the northern portion of the anticline. Five deep drill holes approximately 2,500 feet (762 meters) deep were drilled near the Center of Section 21 and the southwest corner of Section 22 in Township 29 South, Range 24 East. Two of the holes intersected up to 33 feet (10 meters) of the Moss Back sandstone and 2 to 8 feet (0.6 to 2.4 meters) of uranium ore (Wood, 1968). The Lisbon Mine is adjacent to the Property and appears to be along strike of the surface projection of the ore body.

Rio Algom Mines Ltd optioned the Humeca property and drilled out what would become the Lisbon Mine ore body with over a million tons grading 0.37 percent U3O8 at a depth of 2,500 feet (762 meters). The mine produced over 18 million pounds of U3O8.

Lisbon Valley Uranium Project Page 26 Technical Report

This discovery established the eastern limb of the Lisbon Valley anticline as a prime exploration target and validated the ore formation model that Wood (1968) describes:

“In summary, it is believed that the original ore belt encircled the crest of the Permian anticline as a band. The southwest flank of the anticline has been thoroughly explored for large deposits. An extension of the Big Indian ore belt, similar in size and grade to the know ore belt probably occurs in the downthrown block northeast of the Lisbon Valley fault at depths 2400 to 2700 feet beneath the Dakota-capped surface.”

Uranium deposits are known to occur in three formations located in the Lisbon Valley (Figure 13): 1) The Moss Back member of the Chinle Formation is the most significant in terms of past production and future targets on the east side of the Lisbon Valley Fault.; 2) Morrison Formation (Salt Wash member), and 3) the Cutler Formation.

There appear to be three interrelated factors which determine site favorability for localization of ore bodies in the district. First is the sandy geometry of both Moss Back and Cutler units and their relative positions. Second is the availability of reductant from either carbonaceous material associated with mudstones and slits, or from gases percolation upward through the Cutler Formation. Third, the hydrologic gradient and flow directions, prevalent during the time uranium- bearing waters migrated through the lower Moss Back.

Lekas and Dahl (1956) and earlier Steen (1953) noted that the deposits occur in a limited range of elevations (between the 6,000 and 6,700 feet (1,829 and 2,042 meters) contours in the northern half of the ore belt) in a curving line around the Lisbon Valley anticline and is suggestive of a genetic relationship between the anticlinal structure and the uranium deposits. Woods (1968) postulated that the extension of the uranium deposits probably occurs in the downthrown block in an arcuate belt, essentially a mirror image of the known deposits.

As described by Wood (1968) the uranium, probably derived from the Chinle Formation by diagenetic processes, was transported in connate ground waters, was moved by compaction or hydrostatic forces and was deposited under reducing conditions. The uranium was emplaced around the crest of the ancestral anticline, prior to the Laramide orogeny. During the orogen, the tertiary- Lisbon Valley anticline was super-induced on the Permian anticline and, penecontemporaneous with uplift, was faulted parallel to its longitudinal axis.

Lithologically the most favorable host rock is a gray, poorly-sorted, fine-to coarse- grained, calcareous, arkosic quartzose sandstone containing some interbedded mudstone and limestone pebble conglomerates and some mudstone and siltstone lenses, all poorly sorted. The highest-grade ore is in semipermeable, fine-grained, sandy lenses that contain less than 30 percent calcium carbonate

Lisbon Valley Uranium Project Page 27 Technical Report as cement. There is an abundance of mudstone pebbles and coalified wood- trash either in or directly overlying the host rock.

The deposits on the southwest side of the Lisbon Valley fault averaged 6 feet (1.8 meters) thick with ranges from a few inches to as much as 45 feet (13.7 meters) In general the deposits were tabular, amoeba-shaped masses, concordant to the bedding, and were thickest in the lowest sandstone unit of the Moss Back Member of the Chinle Formation.

The arcuate belt of deposits stretches in length for approximately 16 miles (25.8 kilometers). The horizontal width where the ore bodies occur along the trend of the ore belt ranges from 800 to 3,000 feet (244 to 914 meters) in the northern section. At the northwest and southwest ends, where the ore belt is intersected by the Lisbon Valley fault, the ore bodies are spread over a wider area, 3,000 to over 3,600 feet (914 to 1097 meters) across the trend. This may be explained by a flattening of the angle of nonconformity between the Cutler and Chinle beds (Wood, 1968). Stair step faulting and horse tailing of the main fault could also explain the increase in the width of the belt.

There are several postulated theories on the origin of the uranium which formed the deposits including a hydrothermal origin with movement of solutions along the Lisbon Valley fault and then into the permeable zones at the base of the Moss Back (Lekas and Dahl (1956). The more plausible theory was outlined by (Wood, 1968): the uranium was indigenous to the Chinle Formation and was mobilized by diagenetic process, which started soon after deposition of sediments and was moved laterally or outward from the least permeable sediments into more permeable sandstones, as consolidation and compaction continued. The abundance of natural gases, such as methane leaked from the oil and gas reservoirs beneath the ore belt provide reducing agents for precipitation of uranium.

9.0 MINERALIZATION The dominant uranium mineral in the district is uraninite UO2U03 (Figure 16) with associated lesser amounts of coffinite U(Si041-x(OH)4-x and vanadium minerals montroseite, (VO(OH) and doloresite, V2O45-7H20 (Wood, 1968). Uranium mineralization typically occurs filling the open pore spaces of the sand grains and also replace calcite and carbonaceous materials.

Uranium-vanadium minerals in the Cutler ore deposits are described as being generally low-grade and occurring in lenticular arkosic channel fill deposits (Lekas and Dahl 1956). Unlike the deposits in the Moss Back uranium deposits in the Cutler formed without any obvious reductant (Campbell and Steele- Mallory, 1979).

U3O8 grades of the deposits ranged from 0.15% to 0.45% with averages of approximately 0.4% Chenoweth (1990).

Lisbon Valley Uranium Project Page 28 Technical Report

Figure 18 Uraninite ore from the Mi Vida Mine.

10.0 EXPLORATION BZU Holdings, Inc. has not carried out any exploration on the Property other than the preliminary visit by the author. The author visited the property on July 6- 8th and was accompanied a former geologist of Atlas Minerals who worked extensively at several of the deposit and exploration projects in the area.

11.0 TARGET AREAS The principal target is based upon the concept that uranium deposits occur on the down dropped, northeast block of the Lisbon Valley fault as suggested by Wood (1968). The discovery of the Lisbon Mine (Figure 17 and Figure 18), the most productive deposit in the district, produced over 18 million pounds of U3O8, bolsters the concept. The concept assumes the deposits are genetically related to the Lisbon Valley anticline and that deposits were formed in a more or less uniform arc around the anticline (Figure 19). Until the actual targets on the Property are tested they must be considered conceptual. Many factors impacting the localization of the deposits are still not determined.

Lisbon Valley Uranium Project Page 29 Technical Report

Figure 19 Northern headframe of the Lisbon Mine (1970)

Figure 20 Underground operations at the Lisbon Mine (1970)

Lisbon Valley Uranium Project Page 30 Technical Report

Figure 21 Lisbon Valley Mineral Belt and conceptual target map.

Lisbon Valley Uranium Project Page 31 Technical Report

Figure 22 Generalized cross-section showing known uranium associated with the Lisbon anticline and conceptual targets on down dropped block.

12.0 DRILLING Some of the claims and or state leases cover all or portions of historic mines. In these areas, drilling may have occurred during the course of the mining operations. BZU Holdings, Inc. does not have access to any historical drilling which may have been completed on the property. In the principal target area located in Township 29 South, Range 24 East, Township 29 South, Range 25 East and Township 30 South, Range 24 East there are twelve holes that have been mapped on USGS topographic maps, six of which are within the property in an area of approximately four square miles (Figure 10). The drill holes targeted the Cutler and Hermosa formations at depths of 5,000 to 7,000 feet (1,524 to 2,134 meters), results of this drilling is unknown to the author. Any previous work appears to be limited to these holes. The previous ownership of the area is unknown by the author. The entire Lisbon Valley area is an active oil and gas field. Public access to most of these deep drill records is not available for public review.

13.0 SAMPLE METHOD AND APPROACH The favorable uranium targets on the northeast side of the fault are 2,500 feet (762 meters) below the surface and will have to be drilled for testing.

On the southwest side of the fault, reclamation of the historic mine areas prevented access to the subsurface workings for sampling purposes.

Lisbon Valley Uranium Project Page 32 Technical Report

14.0 SAMPLE PREPARATION, ANALYSES AND SECURITY As explained in Section 13.0 above no samples were collected from the property because the host formations are an estimated 2,500 feet below the surface on the northeast down dropped block.

15.0 DATA VERIFICATION The author relied upon published geologic maps and reports in creating this report; BZU Holdings, Inc. provided no data and there were no samples taken.

16.0 ADJACENT PROPERTIES The southeastern project area in Township 30 South, Range 25 East and Township 30 South, Range 26 East is adjacent to the operating Constellation Copper Lisbon Valley Mine; the general area is heavily staked with patented and unpatented mining claims. The project area is located within a producing gas field. Exploration drilling for oil and gas well production is on going.

17.0 MINERAL PROCESSING AND METALLURGICAL TESTING BZU Holdings, Inc. has not collect metallurgical samples nor carried out any metallurgical test work.

18.0 MINERAL RESOURCE AND MINERAL RESERVE ESTIMATES There is no data available that would permit estimation of resources on the Property.

19.0 OTHER RELEVENT DATA AND INFORMATION The author is not aware of any other relevant data or information that is available. With the closure of the historic mines and subsequent reclamation of the sites much of the early data is no longer available to study.

20.0 INTERPRETATION AND CONCLUSIONS From a review of all work done in the district it is concluded that excellent potential exists for further discovery of economic deposits along the down dropped, northeast block of the Lisbon Valley fault. The Lisbon Valley uranium mines produced an estimated 78 million pounds of uranium, most of this from the up thrown, southwest side of the Lisbon Valley fault. BZU’s conceptual model is based on the theory put forth by earlier workers that the uranium deposits formed in an arcuate pattern associated with the Lisbon Valley Anticline. Subsequent faulting down dropped the northeast half of the anticline as well as potential uranium mineralization on the northeast side of the fault. This theory is strengthened by the deep uranium ore body that was mined at the Lisbon Mine by Rio Algom Mines Ltd at depths of approximately 2,500 feet (762 meters) from the favorable host lithologies on the down dropped northeast side of the Lisbon Valley fault.

BZU’s current land position covers an extensive area underlain by known ore- bearing formations. If BZU’s conceptual model is correct the potential for new

Lisbon Valley Uranium Project Page 33 Technical Report discoveries on the northeast side of the Lisbon Valley fault could be equal to or great than what was historically mined. However, until proven by drilling this remains a conceptual theory.

21.0 RECOMMENDATIONS It is recommended that a multi-phase drilling program be implemented consisting of reverse circulation and core drilling where appropriate. The first phase should consist of drilling ten to 15 drill holes with an estimated depth per hole of 3,000 feet (914 meters) or 45,000 feet total (13,716 meters). The first phase would be necessary to establish stratigraphic and structural control. Reverse circulation drilling is recommended for the upper two thirds of the hole to reduce costs. A “core tail” would then be used to complete the drill hole. A geologist should be onsite to log contacts and supervise radiometric probing of the drill holes and supervise sampling. Core would be collected to establish well control for contacts and facies mapping to aid subsequent drill targets.

Assuming there are favorable results from the first phase program a follow-up program would be recommended. Contingent on the success of the Phase 1 program, Phase 2 exploration would concentrate on defining resource targets and would require additional drill footage and personnel.

Table 6 Exploration budget estimate

PHASE ITEM AMOUNT UNIT $RATE $EST Drill Cost -reverse circulation 30,000 foot 15 $450,000 -core drilling 15,000 foot 40 $600,000 Radiometric Probe Rental 3 Month 5000 $15,000 Sample Analysis 500 sample 30 $15,000

PHASE 1 Geologist 3 Month 7000 $21,000 Travel Expenses 3 Month 2000 $6,000 $1,107,000

Drill Cost -reverse circulation 60,000 foot 15 $900,000 -core drilling 40,000 foot 40 $1,600,000 Radiometric Probe Rental 6 Month 5000 $30,000 Select Analysis 2,000 sample 30 $60,000 Geologist 1 6 Month 7000 $42,000 Geologist 2 6 Month 12000 $72,000

PHASE 2 Geological Technician 6 Month 4000 $24,000 Resource Modeling 1 Month 8000 $8,000 Travel Expenses 6 Month 10000 $60,000 Metallurgical Testing 2 Month 10000 $20,000 $2,796,000

Lisbon Valley Uranium Project Page 34 Technical Report

REFERENCES

Chenoweth, W, 1990, Lisbon Valley, Utah’s Premier Uranium Area, A Summary of Exploration and Ore Production; Utah Department of Natural Resources Open File Report 188, 44p.

Doelling, H. 2004.Geologic map of the La Sal 30 by 60 Degree Quadrangle UGS Map 205.

Byerly P. E., Joesting H.R., 1960, USGS Professional Paper 316-C Regional Geophysical Investigations of the Lisbon Valley Area, Utah and Colorado

Lekas, M.A., Dahl, H.M., 1956, The Geology and Uranium Deposits of the Lisbon Valley Anticline, San Juan County, Utah; Intermountain Association of Petroleum Geologists Seventh Annual Field Conference, p 161-168.

Newel, M. 1996, Charlie Steens’s Mi Vida, Moab’s Printing Place 44p.

Price, M., 2005, personal communications.

Steen, C.A., Dix, G.P. Hazen, S.W., and McLellan, R.R.; Information Circular 7669, Bureau of Mines, 1953, 13p.

Walline, D.S., 1980, Big Indian Project, Atlas Minerals Exploration Department Internal Report. 24p.

Weir, G.W., and Puffett, W.P, Open-File Report 81-39, 1981, Incomplete manuscript on stratigraphy and structural geology and uranium-vanadium and copper deposits of the Lisbon Valley area, Utah-Colorado, 292p.

Wood, H. B., 1968, Geology and Exploitation of Uranium Deposits in the Lisbon Valley Area, Utah in Ore Deposits of the United States, 1933-1967; The Graton- Sales Volume edited by John D. Ridge; The American Institute of Mining Metallurgical Engineers, Inc., Part 6 Chapter 37, pp 781-789.

Lisbon Valley Uranium Project Page 35 Technical Report

APPENDIX A

Mining Claim Filing Dates and Recordation Data

Lisbon Valley Uranium Project Page 37 Technical Report

FEDERAL MINING CLAIM SUMMARY LISBON VALLEY UTAH SAN JUAN COUNTY RECORDER U.S. BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT CLAIM NAME LOCATION DATE RECORDATION DATE ENTRY BOOK PAGE RECORDATION DATE UMC SERIAL NUMBER A1 1/4/2005 1/31/2005 75365 834 291 3/17/2005 373977 A2 1/4/2005 1/31/2005 75366 834 292 3/17/2005 373978 A4 1/4/2005 1/31/2005 75368 834 294 3/17/2005 373979 A5 1/4/2005 1/31/2005 75369 834 295 3/17/2005 373980 A6 1/4/2005 1/31/2005 75370 834 296 3/17/2005 373981 A7 1/4/2005 1/31/2005 75371 834 297 3/17/2005 373982 A8 1/4/2005 1/31/2005 75372 834 298 3/17/2005 373983 A9 1/4/2005 1/31/2005 75373 834 299 3/17/2005 373984 A10 1/4/2005 1/31/2005 75374 834 300 3/17/2005 373985 A11 1/4/2005 1/31/2005 75375 834 301 3/17/2005 373986 A12 1/4/2005 1/31/2005 75376 834 302 3/17/2005 373987 A13 1/4/2005 1/31/2005 75377 834 303 3/17/2005 373988 A14 1/4/2005 1/31/2005 75378 834 304 3/17/2005 373989 A15 1/4/2005 1/31/2005 75379 834 305 3/17/2005 373990 A16 1/4/2005 1/31/2005 75380 834 306 3/17/2005 373991 A17 1/4/2005 1/31/2005 75381 834 307 3/17/2005 373992 A18 1/4/2005 1/31/2005 75382 834 308 3/17/2005 373993 A19 1/4/2005 1/31/2005 75383 834 309 3/17/2005 373994 A20 1/4/2005 1/31/2005 75384 834 310 3/17/2005 373995 B1 1/5/2005 1/31/2005 75385 834 311 3/17/2005 373996 B2 1/5/2005 1/31/2005 75386 834 313 3/17/2005 373997 B3 1/5/2005 1/31/2005 75387 834 314 3/17/2005 373998 B5 1/5/2005 1/31/2005 75389 834 316 3/17/2005 373999 B6 1/5/2005 1/31/2005 75390 834 317 3/17/2005 374000 B7 1/5/2005 1/31/2005 75391 834 318 3/17/2005 374001 B8 1/5/2005 1/31/2005 75392 834 319 3/17/2005 374002 B9 1/5/2005 1/31/2005 75393 834 320 3/17/2005 374003 B10 1/5/2005 1/31/2005 75394 834 321 3/17/2005 374004 B11 1/5/2005 1/31/2005 75395 834 322 3/17/2005 374005 B12 1/5/2005 1/31/2005 75396 834 323 3/17/2005 374006 B13 1/5/2005 1/31/2005 75397 834 324 3/17/2005 374007 B14 1/5/2005 1/31/2005 75398 834 325 3/17/2005 374008 B15 1/5/2005 1/31/2005 75399 834 326 3/17/2005 374009 B16 1/5/2005 1/31/2005 75400 834 327 3/17/2005 374010 B17 1/5/2005 1/31/2005 75401 834 328 3/17/2005 374011 B18 1/5/2005 1/31/2005 75402 834 329 3/17/2005 374012 B21 1/5/2005 1/31/2005 75405 834 332 3/17/2005 374013 B22 1/5/2005 1/31/2005 75406 834 333 3/17/2005 374014 B23 1/5/2005 1/31/2005 75407 834 334 3/17/2005 374015 B24 1/5/2005 1/31/2005 75408 834 335 3/17/2005 374016 B25 1/5/2005 1/31/2005 75409 834 336 3/17/2005 374017 B26 1/5/2005 1/31/2005 75410 834 337 3/17/2005 374018 B27 1/5/2005 1/31/2005 75411 834 338 3/17/2005 374019 B28 1/5/2005 1/31/2005 75412 834 339 3/17/2005 374020 B29 1/5/2005 1/31/2005 75413 834 340 3/17/2005 374021 B30 1/5/2005 1/31/2005 75414 834 341 3/17/2005 374022 B31 1/5/2005 1/31/2005 75415 834 342 3/17/2005 374023 B32 1/5/2005 1/31/2005 75416 834 343 3/17/2005 374024 L1 11/3/2004 11/24/2004 74179 832 38 1/31/2005 373268 L2 11/3/2004 11/24/2004 74180 832 39 1/31/2005 373269

Lisbon Valley Uranium Project Page 38 Technical Report

L3 11/3/2004 11/24/2004 74181 832 40 1/31/2005 373270 L4 11/3/2004 11/24/2004 74182 832 41 1/31/2005 373271 L5 11/3/2004 11/24/2004 74183 832 42 1/31/2005 373272 L6 11/3/2004 11/24/2004 74184 832 43 1/31/2005 373273 L7 11/3/2004 11/24/2004 74185 832 44 1/31/2005 373274 L8 11/3/2004 11/24/2004 74186 832 45 1/31/2005 373275 L9 11/3/2004 11/24/2004 74187 832 46 1/31/2005 373276 L10 11/3/2004 11/24/2004 74188 832 47 1/31/2005 373277 T1 11/3/2004 11/24/2004 74107 831 925 1/31/2005 373196 T2 11/3/2004 11/24/2004 74108 831 927 1/31/2005 373197 T3 11/3/2004 11/24/2004 74109 831 928 1/31/2005 373198 T4 11/3/2004 11/24/2004 74110 831 929 1/31/2005 373199 T5 11/3/2004 11/24/2004 74111 831 930 1/31/2005 373200 T6 11/3/2004 11/24/2004 74112 831 931 1/31/2005 373201 T7 11/3/2004 11/24/2004 74113 831 932 1/31/2005 373202 P1 11/5/2004 11/24/2004 74114 831 933 1/31/2005 373203 P2 11/5/2004 11/24/2004 74115 831 934 1/31/2005 373204 P3 11/5/2004 11/24/2004 74116 831 935 1/31/2005 373205 P4 11/5/2004 11/24/2004 74117 831 936 1/31/2005 373206 P5 11/5/2004 11/24/2004 74118 831 937 1/31/2005 373207 P6 11/5/2004 11/24/2004 74119 831 938 1/31/2005 373208 P7 11/5/2004 11/24/2004 74120 831 939 1/31/2005 373209 P8 11/5/2004 11/24/2004 74121 831 940 1/31/2005 373210 P9 11/5/2004 11/24/2004 74122 831 941 1/31/2005 373211 P10 11/5/2004 11/24/2004 74123 831 942 1/31/2005 373212 P11 11/5/2004 11/24/2004 74124 831 943 1/31/2005 373213 P12 11/5/2004 11/24/2004 74125 831 944 1/31/2005 373214 P13 11/5/2004 11/24/2004 74126 831 945 1/31/2005 373215 P14 11/5/2004 11/24/2004 74127 831 946 1/31/2005 373216 P15 11/5/2004 11/24/2004 74128 831 947 1/31/2005 373217 P16 11/5/2004 11/24/2004 74129 831 948 1/31/2005 373218 P17 11/5/2004 11/24/2004 74130 831 949 1/31/2005 373219 P18 11/5/2004 11/24/2004 74131 831 950 1/31/2005 373220 P19 11/5/2004 11/24/2004 74132 831 951 1/31/2005 373221 P20 11/5/2004 11/24/2004 74133 831 952 1/31/2005 373222 V1 11/5/2004 11/24/2004 74134 831 953 1/31/2005 373223 V2 11/5/2004 11/24/2004 74135 831 954 1/31/2005 373224 V3 11/5/2004 11/24/2004 74136 831 955 1/31/2005 373225 V4 11/5/2004 11/24/2004 74137 831 956 1/31/2005 373226 V5 11/5/2004 11/24/2004 74138 831 957 1/31/2005 373227 V6 11/5/2004 11/24/2004 74139 831 958 1/31/2005 373228 V7 11/5/2004 11/24/2004 74140 831 959 1/31/2005 373229 V8 11/5/2004 11/24/2004 74141 831 960 1/31/2005 373230 V9 11/5/2004 11/24/2004 74142 832 1 1/31/2005 373231 V10 11/5/2004 11/24/2004 74143 832 2 1/31/2005 373232 V11 11/5/2004 11/24/2004 74144 832 3 1/31/2005 373233 V12 11/5/2004 11/24/2004 74145 832 4 1/31/2005 373234 V13 11/5/2004 11/24/2004 74146 832 5 1/31/2005 373235 V14 11/5/2004 11/24/2004 74147 832 6 1/31/2005 373236 V15 11/5/2004 11/24/2004 74148 832 7 1/31/2005 373237 V16 11/5/2004 11/24/2004 74149 832 8 1/31/2005 373238 V17 11/5/2004 11/24/2004 74150 832 9 1/31/2005 373239 V18 11/5/2004 11/24/2004 74151 832 10 1/31/2005 373240 V19 11/5/2004 11/24/2004 74152 832 11 1/31/2005 373241

Lisbon Valley Uranium Project Page 39 Technical Report

V20 11/5/2004 11/24/2004 74153 832 12 1/31/2005 373242 G1 11/3/2004 11/24/2004 74154 832 13 1/31/2005 373243 G2 11/3/2004 11/24/2004 74155 832 14 1/31/2005 373244 G3 11/3/2004 11/24/2004 74156 832 15 1/31/2005 373245 G4 11/3/2004 11/24/2004 74157 832 16 1/31/2005 373246 G5 11/3/2004 11/24/2004 74158 832 17 1/31/2005 373247 G6 11/3/2004 11/24/2004 74159 832 18 1/31/2005 373248 G7 11/3/2004 11/24/2004 74160 832 19 1/31/2005 373249 G8 11/3/2004 11/24/2004 74161 832 20 1/31/2005 373250 G9 11/3/2004 11/24/2004 74162 832 21 1/31/2005 373251 G10 11/3/2004 11/24/2004 74163 832 22 1/31/2005 373252 G11 11/3/2004 11/24/2004 74164 832 23 1/31/2005 373253 G12 11/3/2004 11/24/2004 74165 832 24 1/31/2005 373254 G13 11/3/2004 11/24/2004 74166 832 25 1/31/2005 373255 G14 11/3/2004 11/24/2004 74167 832 26 1/31/2005 373256 G15 11/3/2004 11/24/2004 74168 832 27 1/31/2005 373257 G16 11/3/2004 11/24/2004 74169 832 28 1/31/2005 373258 G17 11/3/2004 11/24/2004 74170 832 29 1/31/2005 373259 G18 11/3/2004 11/24/2004 74171 832 30 1/31/2005 373260 G19 11/3/2004 11/24/2004 74172 832 31 1/31/2005 373261 G20 11/3/2004 11/24/2004 74173 832 32 1/31/2005 373262 H1 11/3/2004 11/24/2004 74174 832 33 1/31/2005 373263 H2 11/3/2004 11/24/2004 74175 832 34 1/31/2005 373264 H3 11/3/2004 11/24/2004 74176 832 35 1/31/2005 373265 H4 11/3/2004 11/24/2004 74177 832 36 1/31/2005 373266 H5 11/3/2004 11/24/2004 74178 832 37 1/31/2005 373267 HILO1 3/17/2005 4/13/2005 77323 837 517 6/13/2005 377056 HILO2 3/17/2005 4/13/2005 77324 837 519 6/13/2005 377057 TED1 3/17/2005 4/13/2005 77317 837 510 6/13/2005 377058 TED2 3/17/2005 4/13/2005 77318 837 512 6/13/2005 377059 TED3 3/17/2005 4/13/2005 77319 837 513 6/13/2005 377060 TED4 3/17/2005 4/13/2005 77320 837 514 6/13/2005 377061 TED7 3/17/2005 4/13/2005 77321 837 515 6/13/2005 377062 TED8 3/17/2005 4/13/2005 77322 837 516 6/13/2005 377063 TOM1 3/17/2005 4/13/2005 77295 837 487 6/13/2005 377064 TOM2 3/17/2005 4/13/2005 77296 837 489 6/13/2005 377065 TOM3 3/17/2005 4/13/2005 77297 837 490 6/13/2005 377066 TOM4 3/17/2005 4/13/2005 77298 837 491 6/13/2005 377067 TOM5 3/17/2005 4/13/2005 77299 837 492 6/13/2005 377068 TOM6 3/17/2005 4/13/2005 77300 837 493 6/13/2005 377069 TOM7 3/17/2005 4/13/2005 77301 837 494 6/13/2005 377070 TOM8 3/17/2005 4/13/2005 77302 837 495 6/13/2005 377071 TOM9 3/17/2005 4/13/2005 77303 837 496 6/13/2005 377072 TOM10 3/17/2005 4/13/2005 77304 837 497 6/13/2005 377073 TOM11 3/17/2005 4/13/2005 77305 837 498 6/13/2005 377074 TOM12 3/17/2005 4/13/2005 77306 837 499 6/13/2005 377075 TOM13 3/17/2005 4/13/2005 77307 837 500 6/13/2005 377076 TOM14 3/17/2005 4/13/2005 77308 837 501 6/13/2005 377077 TOM15 3/17/2005 4/13/2005 77309 837 502 6/13/2005 377078 TOM16 3/17/2005 4/13/2005 77310 837 503 6/13/2005 377079 TOM17 3/17/2005 4/13/2005 77311 837 504 6/13/2005 377080 TOM18 3/17/2005 4/13/2005 77312 837 505 6/13/2005 377081 TOM19 3/17/2005 4/13/2005 77313 837 506 6/13/2005 377082 TOM20 3/17/2005 4/13/2005 77314 837 507 6/13/2005 377083

Lisbon Valley Uranium Project Page 40 Technical Report

TOM21 3/17/2005 4/13/2005 77315 837 508 6/13/2005 377084 TOM22 3/17/2005 4/13/2005 77316 837 509 6/13/2005 377085 V1 3/17/2005 4/13/2005 77259 837 449 6/13/2005 377086 V2 3/17/2005 4/13/2005 77260 837 451 6/13/2005 377087 V3 3/17/2005 4/13/2005 77261 837 452 6/13/2005 377088 V4 3/17/2005 4/13/2005 77262 837 453 6/13/2005 377089 V5 3/17/2005 4/13/2005 77263 837 454 6/13/2005 377090 V6 3/17/2005 4/13/2005 77264 837 455 6/13/2005 377091 V7 3/17/2005 4/13/2005 77265 837 456 6/13/2005 377092 V8 3/17/2005 4/13/2005 77266 837 457 6/13/2005 377093 V9 3/17/2005 4/13/2005 77267 837 458 6/13/2005 377094 V10 3/17/2005 4/13/2005 77268 837 459 6/13/2005 377095 LM1 3/17/2005 4/13/2005 77269 837 460 6/13/2005 377096 LM2 3/17/2005 4/13/2005 77270 837 462 6/13/2005 377097 LM3 3/17/2005 4/13/2005 77271 837 463 6/13/2005 377098 LM4 3/17/2005 4/13/2005 77272 837 464 6/13/2005 377099 LM5 3/17/2005 4/13/2005 77273 837 465 6/13/2005 377100 LM6 3/17/2005 4/13/2005 77274 837 466 6/13/2005 377101 LM7 3/17/2005 4/13/2005 77275 837 467 6/13/2005 377102 LM8 3/17/2005 4/13/2005 77276 837 468 6/13/2005 377103 LM9 3/17/2005 4/13/2005 77277 837 469 6/13/2005 377104 LM10 3/17/2005 4/13/2005 77278 837 470 6/13/2005 377105 LM11 3/17/2005 4/13/2005 77279 837 471 6/13/2005 377106 LM12 3/17/2005 4/13/2005 77280 837 472 6/13/2005 377107 LM13 3/17/2005 4/13/2005 77281 837 473 6/13/2005 377108 LM14 3/17/2005 4/13/2005 77282 837 474 6/13/2005 377109 LM15 3/17/2005 4/13/2005 77283 837 475 6/13/2005 377110 LM16 3/17/2005 4/13/2005 77284 837 476 6/13/2005 377111 LM17 3/17/2005 4/13/2005 77285 837 477 6/13/2005 377112 LM18 3/17/2005 4/13/2005 77286 837 478 6/13/2005 377113 LM19 3/17/2005 4/13/2005 77287 837 479 6/13/2005 377114 LM20 3/17/2005 4/13/2005 77288 837 480 6/13/2005 377115 LM21 3/17/2005 4/13/2005 77289 837 481 6/13/2005 377116 LM22 3/17/2005 4/13/2005 77290 837 482 6/13/2005 377117 LM23 3/17/2005 4/13/2005 77291 837 483 6/13/2005 377118 LM24 3/17/2005 4/13/2005 77292 837 484 6/13/2005 377119 LM25 3/17/2005 4/13/2005 77293 837 485 6/13/2005 377120 LM26 3/17/2005 4/13/2005 77294 837 486 6/13/2005 377121 R90 3/18/2005 4/13/2005 77325 837 520 6/15/2005 377139 R91 3/18/2005 4/13/2005 77326 837 522 6/15/2005 377140 R92 3/18/2005 4/13/2005 77327 837 523 6/15/2005 377141 R108 3/18/2005 4/13/2005 77343 837 539 6/15/2005 377142 R109 3/18/2005 4/13/2005 77344 837 540 6/15/2005 377143 R110 3/18/2005 4/13/2005 77345 837 541 6/15/2005 377144 R111 3/18/2005 4/13/2005 77346 837 542 6/15/2005 377145 R112 3/18/2005 4/13/2005 77347 837 543 6/15/2005 377146 R113 3/18/2005 4/13/2005 77348 837 544 6/15/2005 377147 R114 3/18/2005 4/13/2005 77349 837 545 6/15/2005 377148 R115 3/18/2005 4/13/2005 77350 837 546 6/15/2005 377149 R116 3/18/2005 4/13/2005 77351 837 547 6/15/2005 377150 R117 3/18/2005 4/13/2005 77352 837 548 6/15/2005 377151 R118 3/18/2005 4/13/2005 77353 837 549 6/15/2005 377152 R119 3/18/2005 4/13/2005 77354 837 550 6/15/2005 377153 R120 3/18/2005 4/13/2005 77355 837 551 6/15/2005 377154

Lisbon Valley Uranium Project Page 41 Technical Report

R121 3/18/2005 4/13/2005 77356 837 552 6/15/2005 377155 R122 3/18/2005 4/13/2005 77357 837 553 6/15/2005 377156 R123 3/18/2005 4/13/2005 77358 837 554 6/15/2005 377157 R124 3/18/2005 4/13/2005 77359 837 555 6/15/2005 377158 R125 3/18/2005 4/13/2005 77360 837 556 6/15/2005 377159 R126 3/18/2005 4/13/2005 77361 837 557 6/15/2005 377160 R127 3/18/2005 4/13/2005 77362 837 558 6/15/2005 377161 R128 3/18/2005 4/13/2005 77363 837 559 6/15/2005 377162 R129 3/18/2005 4/13/2005 77364 837 560 6/15/2005 377163 R131 3/18/2005 4/13/2005 77366 837 562 6/15/2005 377164 R132 3/18/2005 4/13/2005 77367 837 563 6/15/2005 377165 R133 3/18/2005 4/13/2005 77368 837 564 6/15/2005 377166 R1 3/19/2005 4/13/2005 77421 837 621 6/16/2005 377171 R2 3/19/2005 4/13/2005 77422 837 623 6/16/2005 377172 R3 3/19/2005 4/13/2005 77423 837 624 6/16/2005 377173 R4 3/19/2005 4/13/2005 77424 837 625 6/16/2005 377174 R5 3/19/2005 4/13/2005 77425 837 626 6/16/2005 377175 R6 3/19/2005 4/13/2005 77426 837 627 6/16/2005 377176 R7 3/19/2005 4/13/2005 77427 837 628 6/16/2005 377177 R16 3/21/2005 4/13/2005 77436 837 637 6/16/2005 377178 R17 3/21/2005 4/13/2005 77437 837 638 6/16/2005 377179 R18 3/21/2005 4/13/2005 77438 837 639 6/16/2005 377180 R19 3/21/2005 4/13/2005 77439 837 640 6/16/2005 377181 R20 3/21/2005 4/13/2005 77440 837 641 6/16/2005 377182 R21 3/21/2005 4/13/2005 77441 837 642 6/16/2005 377183 R22 3/21/2005 4/13/2005 77442 837 643 6/16/2005 377184 R23 3/21/2005 4/13/2005 77443 837 644 6/16/2005 377185 R24 3/21/2005 4/13/2005 77444 837 645 6/16/2005 377186 R25 3/21/2005 4/13/2005 77445 837 646 6/16/2005 377187 R26 3/21/2005 4/13/2005 77446 837 647 6/16/2005 377188 R27 3/21/2005 4/13/2005 77447 837 648 6/16/2005 377189 R28 3/21/2005 4/13/2005 77448 837 649 6/16/2005 377190 R29 3/21/2005 4/13/2005 77449 837 650 6/16/2005 377191 R31 3/21/2005 4/13/2005 77451 837 652 6/16/2005 377192 R33 3/21/2005 4/13/2005 77453 837 654 6/16/2005 377193 R35 3/21/2005 4/13/2005 77455 837 656 6/16/2005 377194 R44 3/20/2005 4/13/2005 77464 837 665 6/16/2005 377195 R45 3/20/2005 4/13/2005 77465 837 666 6/16/2005 377196 R46 3/20/2005 4/13/2005 77466 837 667 6/16/2005 377197 R47 3/20/2005 4/13/2005 77467 837 668 6/16/2005 377198 R48 3/20/2005 4/13/2005 77468 837 669 6/16/2005 377199 R49 3/20/2005 4/13/2005 77469 837 670 6/16/2005 377200 R50 3/20/2005 4/13/2005 77470 837 671 6/16/2005 377201 R51 3/20/2005 4/13/2005 77471 837 672 6/16/2005 377202 R52 3/20/2005 4/13/2005 77472 837 673 6/16/2005 377203 R53 3/21/2005 4/13/2005 77473 837 674 6/16/2005 377204 R54 3/20/2005 4/13/2005 77474 837 675 6/16/2005 377205 R55 3/21/2005 4/13/2005 77475 837 676 6/16/2005 377206 R56 3/20/2005 4/13/2005 77476 837 677 6/16/2005 377207 R57 3/21/2005 4/13/2005 77477 837 678 6/16/2005 377208 R58 3/20/2005 4/13/2005 77478 837 679 6/16/2005 377209 R59 3/21/2005 4/13/2005 77479 837 680 6/16/2005 377210 R61 3/21/2005 4/13/2005 77481 837 682 6/16/2005 377211 R63 3/21/2005 4/13/2005 77483 837 684 6/16/2005 377212

Lisbon Valley Uranium Project Page 42 Technical Report

R65 3/21/2005 4/13/2005 77485 837 686 6/16/2005 377213 R74 3/21/2005 4/13/2005 77494 837 695 6/16/2005 377214 R75 3/21/2005 4/13/2005 77495 837 696 6/16/2005 377215 R76 3/21/2005 4/13/2005 77496 837 697 6/16/2005 377216 R77 3/21/2005 4/13/2005 77497 837 698 6/16/2005 377217 R78 3/21/2005 4/13/2005 77498 837 699 6/16/2005 377218 R79 3/21/2005 4/13/2005 77499 837 700 6/16/2005 377219 R80 3/21/2005 4/13/2005 77500 837 701 6/16/2005 377220 R81 3/21/2005 4/13/2005 77501 837 702 6/16/2005 377221 R82 3/21/2005 4/13/2005 77502 837 703 6/16/2005 377222 R83 3/21/2005 4/13/2005 77503 837 704 6/16/2005 377223 R84 3/21/2005 4/13/2005 77504 837 705 6/16/2005 377224 VIDA1 3/19/2005 4/13/2005 77419 837 618 6/16/2005 377225 VIDA2 3/19/2005 4/13/2005 77420 837 620 6/16/2005 377226 LMW1 3/19/2005 4/13/2005 77370 837 566 6/16/2005 377227 LMW2 3/19/2005 4/13/2005 77371 837 568 6/16/2005 377228 LMW3 3/19/2005 4/13/2005 77372 837 569 6/16/2005 377229 LMW4 3/19/2005 4/13/2005 77373 837 570 6/16/2005 377230 LMW5 3/19/2005 4/13/2005 77374 837 571 6/16/2005 377231 LMW6 3/19/2005 4/13/2005 77375 837 572 6/16/2005 377232 LMW8 3/19/2005 4/13/2005 77376 837 573 6/16/2005 377233 LMW10 3/19/2005 4/13/2005 77377 837 574 6/16/2005 377234 LMW12 3/19/2005 4/13/2005 77378 837 575 6/16/2005 377235 LMW13 3/19/2005 4/13/2005 77379 837 576 6/16/2005 377236 LMW14 3/19/2005 4/13/2005 77380 837 577 6/16/2005 377237 LMW15 3/19/2005 4/13/2005 77381 837 578 6/16/2005 377238 LMW16 3/19/2005 4/13/2005 77382 837 579 6/16/2005 377239 LMW17 3/19/2005 4/13/2005 77383 837 580 6/16/2005 377240 TH1 3/22/2005 4/13/2005 77404 837 602 6/21/2005 377615 TH4 3/22/2005 4/13/2005 77405 837 604 6/21/2005 377616 TH5 3/22/2005 4/13/2005 77406 837 605 6/21/2005 377617 TH11 3/22/2005 4/13/2005 77412 837 611 6/21/2005 377618 TH12 3/22/2005 4/13/2005 77413 837 612 6/21/2005 377619 TH13 3/22/2005 4/13/2005 77414 837 613 6/21/2005 377620 TH14 3/22/2005 4/13/2005 77415 837 614 6/21/2005 377621 TH15 3/22/2005 4/13/2005 77416 837 615 6/21/2005 377622 TH16 3/22/2005 4/13/2005 77417 837 616 6/21/2005 377623 TH17 3/22/2005 4/13/2005 77418 837 617 6/21/2005 377624 EA1 3/22/2005 4/13/2005 77384 837 581 6/21/2005 377625 EA2 3/22/2005 4/13/2005 77385 837 583 6/21/2005 377626 EA3 3/22/2005 4/13/2005 77386 837 584 6/21/2005 377627 EA4 3/22/2005 4/13/2005 77387 837 585 6/21/2005 377628 EA5 3/22/2005 4/13/2005 77388 837 586 6/21/2005 377629 EA6 3/22/2005 4/13/2005 77389 837 587 6/21/2005 377630 EA7 3/22/2005 4/13/2005 77390 837 588 6/21/2005 377631 EA8 3/22/2005 4/13/2005 77391 837 589 6/21/2005 377632 EA9 3/22/2005 4/13/2005 77392 837 590 6/21/2005 377633 EA10 3/22/2005 4/13/2005 77393 837 591 6/21/2005 377634 EA11 3/22/2005 4/13/2005 77394 837 592 6/21/2005 377635 EA12 3/22/2005 4/13/2005 77395 837 593 6/21/2005 377636 EA13 3/22/2005 4/13/2005 77396 837 594 6/21/2005 377637 EA14 3/22/2005 4/13/2005 77397 837 595 6/21/2005 377638 EA15 3/22/2005 4/13/2005 77398 837 596 6/21/2005 377639 EA16 3/22/2005 4/13/2005 77399 837 597 6/21/2005 377640

Lisbon Valley Uranium Project Page 43 Technical Report

EA17 3/22/2005 4/13/2005 77400 837 598 6/21/2005 377641 EA18 3/22/2005 4/13/2005 77401 837 599 6/21/2005 377642 EA19 3/22/2005 4/13/2005 77402 837 600 6/21/2005 377643 EA20 3/22/2005 4/13/2005 77403 837 601 6/21/2005 377644 LO1 4/7/2005 4/25/2005 78212 838 650 7/1/2005 377680 LO2 4/7/2005 4/25/2005 78213 838 652 7/1/2005 377681 LO3 4/7/2005 4/25/2005 78214 838 653 7/1/2005 377682 LO4 4/7/2005 4/25/2005 78215 838 654 7/1/2005 377683 LO5 4/7/2005 4/25/2005 78216 838 655 7/1/2005 377684 LO6 4/7/2005 4/25/2005 78217 838 656 7/1/2005 377685 LO7 4/7/2005 4/25/2005 78218 838 657 7/1/2005 377686 LO8 4/7/2005 4/25/2005 78219 838 658 7/1/2005 377687 LO9 4/7/2005 4/25/2005 78220 838 659 7/1/2005 377688 LO10 4/7/2005 4/25/2005 78221 838 660 7/1/2005 377689 LO11 4/7/2005 4/25/2005 78222 838 661 7/1/2005 377690 LO12 4/7/2005 4/25/2005 78223 838 662 7/1/2005 377691 LO13 4/7/2005 4/25/2005 78224 838 663 7/1/2005 377692 LO14 4/7/2005 4/25/2005 78225 838 664 7/1/2005 377693 RM1 4/6/2005 4/25/2005 78226 838 665 7/1/2005 377694 RM2 4/6/2005 4/25/2005 78227 838 667 7/1/2005 377695 RM3 4/6/2005 4/25/2005 78228 838 668 7/1/2005 377696 RM4 4/6/2005 4/25/2005 78229 838 669 7/1/2005 377697 RM5 4/6/2005 4/25/2005 78230 838 670 7/1/2005 377698 RM6 4/6/2005 4/25/2005 78231 838 671 7/1/2005 377699 RM7 4/6/2005 4/25/2005 78232 838 672 7/1/2005 377700 RM8 4/6/2005 4/25/2005 78233 838 673 7/1/2005 377701 RM9 4/6/2005 4/25/2005 78234 838 674 7/1/2005 377702 RM10 4/6/2005 4/25/2005 78235 838 675 7/1/2005 377703 RM11 4/6/2005 4/25/2005 78236 838 676 7/1/2005 377704 RM12 4/6/2005 4/25/2005 78237 838 677 7/1/2005 377705 RM13 4/6/2005 4/25/2005 78238 838 678 7/1/2005 377706 RM14 4/6/2005 4/25/2005 78239 838 679 7/1/2005 377707 RM15 4/6/2005 4/25/2005 78240 838 680 7/1/2005 377708 RM16 4/6/2005 4/25/2005 78241 838 681 7/1/2005 377709 R148 4/5/2005 4/25/2005 78242 838 682 7/1/2005 377710 R149 4/5/2005 4/25/2005 78243 838 684 7/1/2005 377711 R152 4/5/2005 4/25/2005 78246 838 687 7/1/2005 377712 R153 4/5/2005 4/25/2005 78247 838 688 7/1/2005 377713 R154 4/5/2005 4/25/2005 78248 838 689 7/1/2005 377714 R155 4/5/2005 4/25/2005 78249 838 690 7/1/2005 377715 R156 4/5/2005 4/25/2005 78250 838 691 7/1/2005 377716 R157 4/5/2005 4/25/2005 78251 838 692 7/1/2005 377717 R158 4/5/2005 4/25/2005 78252 838 693 7/1/2005 377718 R159 4/5/2005 4/25/2005 78253 838 694 7/1/2005 377719 R160 4/5/2005 4/25/2005 78254 838 695 7/1/2005 377720 R161 4/5/2005 4/25/2005 78255 838 696 7/1/2005 377721 R162 4/5/2005 4/25/2005 78256 838 697 7/1/2005 377722 R163 4/5/2005 4/25/2005 78257 838 698 7/1/2005 377723 R164 4/5/2005 4/25/2005 78258 838 699 7/1/2005 377724 R165 4/5/2005 4/25/2005 78259 838 700 7/1/2005 377725 R166 4/5/2005 4/25/2005 78260 838 701 7/1/2005 377726 R167 4/5/2005 4/25/2005 78261 838 702 7/1/2005 377727 R168 4/5/2005 4/25/2005 78262 838 703 7/1/2005 377728 R169 4/5/2005 4/25/2005 78263 838 704 7/1/2005 377729

Lisbon Valley Uranium Project Page 44 Technical Report

R170 4/5/2005 4/25/2005 78264 838 705 7/1/2005 377730 R171 4/5/2005 4/25/2005 78265 838 706 7/1/2005 377731 R172 4/5/2005 4/25/2005 78266 838 707 7/1/2005 377732 R173 4/5/2005 4/25/2005 78267 838 708 7/1/2005 377733 R174 4/5/2005 4/25/2005 78268 838 709 7/1/2005 377734 R175 4/5/2005 4/25/2005 78269 838 710 7/1/2005 377735 R176 4/5/2005 4/25/2005 78270 838 711 7/1/2005 377736 R177 4/5/2005 4/25/2005 78271 838 712 7/1/2005 377737 R178 4/5/2005 4/25/2005 78272 838 713 7/1/2005 377738 FR10 4/7/2005 4/25/2005 78294 838 737 7/1/2005 377739 Y1 6/17/2005 7/15/2005 80589 842 779 8/29/2005 378680 Y2 6/17/2005 7/15/2005 80590 842 781 8/29/2005 378681 Y3 6/17/2005 7/15/2005 80591 842 782 8/29/2005 378682 Y4 6/17/2005 7/15/2005 80592 842 783 8/29/2005 378683 Y5 6/17/2005 7/15/2005 80593 842 784 8/29/2005 378684 Y6 6/17/2005 7/15/2005 80594 842 785 8/29/2005 378685 Y7 6/17/2005 7/15/2005 80595 842 786 8/29/2005 378686 Y8 6/17/2005 7/15/2005 80596 842 787 8/29/2005 378687 Y9 6/17/2005 7/15/2005 80597 842 788 8/29/2005 378688 Y10 6/17/2005 7/15/2005 80598 842 789 8/29/2005 378689 Y11 6/17/2005 7/15/2005 80599 842 790 8/29/2005 378690 Y12 6/17/2005 7/15/2005 80600 842 791 8/29/2005 378691 Y13 6/17/2005 7/15/2005 80601 842 792 8/29/2005 378692 Y14 6/17/2005 7/15/2005 80602 842 793 8/29/2005 378693 Y15 6/17/2005 7/15/2005 80603 842 794 8/29/2005 378694 Y16 6/17/2005 7/15/2005 80604 842 795 8/29/2005 378695 Y17 6/17/2005 7/15/2005 80605 842 796 8/29/2005 378696 Y18 6/17/2005 7/15/2005 80606 842 797 8/29/2005 378697 Y19 6/17/2005 7/15/2005 80607 842 798 8/29/2005 378698 Y20 6/17/2005 7/15/2005 80608 842 799 8/29/2005 378699 Y21 6/17/2005 7/15/2005 80609 842 800 8/29/2005 378700 Y22 6/17/2005 7/15/2005 80610 842 801 8/29/2005 378701 Y23 6/17/2005 7/15/2005 80611 842 802 8/29/2005 378702 Y24 6/17/2005 7/15/2005 80612 842 803 8/29/2005 378703 Y25 6/17/2005 7/15/2005 80613 842 804 8/29/2005 378704 Y26 6/17/2005 7/15/2005 80614 842 805 8/29/2005 378705 Y27 6/17/2005 7/15/2005 80615 842 806 8/29/2005 378706 Y28 6/17/2005 7/15/2005 80616 842 807 8/29/2005 378707 Y29 6/17/2005 7/15/2005 80617 842 808 8/29/2005 378708 Y30 6/17/2005 7/15/2005 80618 842 809 8/29/2005 378709 Y31 6/17/2005 7/15/2005 80619 842 810 8/29/2005 378710 Y32 6/17/2005 7/15/2005 80620 842 811 8/29/2005 378711 Y33 6/17/2005 7/15/2005 80621 842 812 8/29/2005 378712 Y34 6/17/2005 7/15/2005 80622 842 813 8/29/2005 378713 Y35 6/17/2005 7/15/2005 80623 842 814 8/29/2005 378714 Y36 6/17/2005 7/15/2005 80624 842 815 8/29/2005 378715 Y37 6/17/2005 7/15/2005 80625 842 816 8/29/2005 378716 Y38 6/17/2005 7/15/2005 80626 842 817 8/29/2005 378717 Y39 6/17/2005 7/15/2005 80627 842 818 8/29/2005 378718 Y40 6/17/2005 7/15/2005 80628 842 819 8/29/2005 378719 Y41 6/17/2005 7/15/2005 80629 842 820 8/29/2005 378720 Y42 6/17/2005 7/15/2005 80630 842 821 8/29/2005 378721 Y43 6/17/2005 7/15/2005 80631 842 822 8/29/2005 378722 Y44 6/17/2005 7/15/2005 80632 842 823 8/29/2005 378723

Lisbon Valley Uranium Project Page 45 Technical Report

Y45 6/17/2005 7/15/2005 80633 842 824 8/29/2005 378724 Y46 6/17/2005 7/15/2005 80634 842 825 8/29/2005 378725 Y47 6/17/2005 7/15/2005 80635 842 826 8/29/2005 378726 Y48 6/17/2005 7/15/2005 80636 842 827 8/29/2005 378727 Y49 6/17/2005 7/15/2005 80637 842 828 8/29/2005 378728 Y50 6/17/2005 7/15/2005 80638 842 829 8/29/2005 378729 Y51 6/17/2005 7/15/2005 80639 842 830 8/29/2005 378730 Y52 6/17/2005 7/15/2005 80640 842 831 8/29/2005 378731 Y53 6/17/2005 7/15/2005 80641 842 832 8/29/2005 378732 Y54 6/17/2005 7/15/2005 80642 842 833 8/29/2005 378733 Y55 6/17/2005 7/15/2005 80643 842 834 8/29/2005 378734 Y56 6/17/2005 7/15/2005 80644 842 835 8/29/2005 378735 Y57 6/17/2005 7/15/2005 80645 842 836 8/29/2005 378736 Y58 6/17/2005 7/15/2005 80646 842 837 8/29/2005 378737 Y59 6/17/2005 7/15/2005 80647 842 838 8/29/2005 378738 Y60 6/17/2005 7/15/2005 80648 842 839 8/29/2005 378739 Y61 6/17/2005 7/15/2005 80649 842 840 8/29/2005 378740 Y62 6/17/2005 7/15/2005 80650 842 841 8/29/2005 378741 Y63 6/17/2005 7/15/2005 80651 842 842 8/29/2005 378742 Y64 6/17/2005 7/15/2005 80652 842 843 8/29/2005 378743 Y65 6/17/2005 7/15/2005 80653 842 844 8/29/2005 378744 Y66 6/17/2005 7/15/2005 80654 842 845 8/29/2005 378745 Y67 6/17/2005 7/15/2005 80655 842 846 8/29/2005 378746 Y68 6/17/2005 7/15/2005 80656 842 847 8/29/2005 378747 Y69 6/17/2005 7/15/2005 80657 842 848 8/29/2005 378748 Y70 6/17/2005 7/15/2005 80658 842 849 8/29/2005 378749 Y71 6/17/2005 7/15/2005 80659 842 850 8/29/2005 378750 Y72 6/17/2005 7/15/2005 80660 842 851 8/29/2005 378751 Y73 6/17/2005 7/15/2005 80661 842 852 8/29/2005 378752 Y74 6/17/2005 7/15/2005 80662 842 853 8/29/2005 378753 Y75 6/17/2005 7/15/2005 80663 842 854 8/29/2005 378754 Y76 6/17/2005 7/15/2005 80664 842 855 8/29/2005 378755 Y77 6/17/2005 7/15/2005 80665 842 856 8/29/2005 378756 Y78 6/17/2005 7/15/2005 80666 842 857 8/29/2005 378757 Y79 6/17/2005 7/15/2005 80667 842 858 8/29/2005 378758 Y80 6/17/2005 7/15/2005 80668 842 859 8/29/2005 378759 Y81 6/17/2005 7/15/2005 80669 842 860 8/29/2005 378760 Y82 6/17/2005 7/15/2005 80670 842 861 8/29/2005 378761 Y83 6/17/2005 7/15/2005 80671 842 862 8/29/2005 378762 Y84 6/17/2005 7/15/2005 80672 842 863 8/29/2005 378763 Y85 6/17/2005 7/15/2005 80673 842 864 8/29/2005 378764 Z1 6/19/2005 7/15/2005 80674 842 865 8/29/2005 378544 Z2 6/19/2005 7/15/2005 80675 842 867 8/29/2005 378545 Z3 6/19/2005 7/15/2005 80676 842 868 8/29/2005 378546 Z4 6/19/2005 7/15/2005 80677 842 869 8/29/2005 378547 Z5 6/19/2005 7/15/2005 80678 842 870 8/29/2005 378548 Z6 6/19/2005 7/15/2005 80679 842 871 8/29/2005 378549 Z7 6/19/2005 7/15/2005 80680 842 872 8/29/2005 378550 Z8 6/19/2005 7/15/2005 80681 842 873 8/29/2005 378551 Z9 6/19/2005 7/15/2005 80682 842 874 8/29/2005 378552 Z10 6/19/2005 7/15/2005 80683 842 875 8/29/2005 378553 Z11 6/19/2005 7/15/2005 80684 842 876 8/29/2005 378554 Z12 6/19/2005 7/15/2005 80685 842 877 8/29/2005 378555 Z13 6/19/2005 7/15/2005 80686 842 878 8/29/2005 378556

Lisbon Valley Uranium Project Page 46 Technical Report

Z14 6/19/2005 7/15/2005 80687 842 879 8/29/2005 378557 Z15 6/19/2005 7/15/2005 80688 842 880 8/29/2005 378558 Z16 6/19/2005 7/15/2005 80689 842 881 8/29/2005 378559 Z17 6/19/2005 7/15/2005 80690 842 882 8/29/2005 378560 Z18 6/19/2005 7/15/2005 80691 842 883 8/29/2005 378561 Z19 6/19/2005 7/15/2005 80692 842 884 8/29/2005 378562 Z20 6/19/2005 7/15/2005 80693 842 885 8/29/2005 378563 Z21 6/19/2005 7/15/2005 80694 842 886 8/29/2005 378564 Z22 6/19/2005 7/15/2005 80695 842 887 8/29/2005 378565 Z23 6/19/2005 7/15/2005 80696 842 888 8/29/2005 378566 Z24 6/19/2005 7/15/2005 80697 842 889 8/29/2005 378567 Z25 6/19/2005 7/15/2005 80727 842 919 8/29/2005 378568 Z26 6/19/2005 7/15/2005 80728 842 921 8/29/2005 378569 Z27 6/19/2005 7/15/2005 80729 842 922 8/29/2005 378570 Z28 6/19/2005 7/15/2005 80730 842 923 8/29/2005 378571 Z29 6/19/2005 7/15/2005 80731 842 924 8/29/2005 378572 Z30 6/19/2005 7/15/2005 80732 842 925 8/29/2005 378573 Z31 6/19/2005 7/15/2005 80733 842 926 8/29/2005 378574 Z32 6/19/2005 7/15/2005 80734 842 927 8/29/2005 378575 Z33 6/19/2005 7/15/2005 80735 842 928 8/29/2005 378576 Z34 6/19/2005 7/15/2005 80736 842 929 8/29/2005 378577 Z35 6/19/2005 7/15/2005 80737 842 930 8/29/2005 378578 Z36 6/19/2005 7/15/2005 80738 842 931 8/29/2005 378579 Z37 6/19/2005 7/15/2005 80739 842 932 8/29/2005 378580 Z38 6/19/2005 7/15/2005 80740 842 933 8/29/2005 378581 Z39 6/19/2005 7/15/2005 80741 842 934 8/29/2005 378582 Z40 6/19/2005 7/15/2005 80742 842 935 8/29/2005 378583 Z41 6/19/2005 7/15/2005 80743 842 936 8/29/2005 378584 Z42 6/19/2005 7/15/2005 80744 842 937 8/29/2005 378585 Z43 6/19/2005 7/15/2005 80745 842 938 8/29/2005 378586 Z44 6/19/2005 7/15/2005 80746 842 939 8/29/2005 378587 Z45 6/19/2005 7/15/2005 80747 842 940 8/29/2005 378588 Z46 6/19/2005 7/15/2005 80748 842 941 8/29/2005 378589 Z47 6/19/2005 7/15/2005 80749 842 942 8/29/2005 378590 Z48 6/19/2005 7/15/2005 80750 842 943 8/29/2005 378591 Z49 6/19/2005 7/15/2005 80751 842 944 8/29/2005 378592 Z50 6/19/2005 7/15/2005 80752 842 945 8/29/2005 378593 Z51 6/19/2005 7/15/2005 80753 842 946 8/29/2005 378594 Z52 6/19/2005 7/15/2005 80698 842 890 8/29/2005 378595 Z53 6/19/2005 7/15/2005 80699 842 891 8/29/2005 378596 Z54 6/19/2005 7/15/2005 80700 842 892 8/29/2005 378597 Z55 6/19/2005 7/15/2005 80701 842 893 8/29/2005 378598 Z56 6/19/2005 7/15/2005 80702 842 894 8/29/2005 378599 Z57 6/19/2005 7/15/2005 80703 842 895 8/29/2005 378600 Z58 6/19/2005 7/15/2005 80704 842 896 8/29/2005 378601 Z59 6/19/2005 7/15/2005 80705 842 897 8/29/2005 378602 Z60 6/19/2005 7/15/2005 80706 842 898 8/29/2005 378603 Z61 6/19/2005 7/15/2005 80707 842 899 8/29/2005 378604 Z62 6/19/2005 7/15/2005 80708 842 900 8/29/2005 378605 Z63 6/19/2005 7/15/2005 80709 842 901 8/29/2005 378606 Z64 6/19/2005 7/15/2005 80710 842 902 8/29/2005 378607 Z65 6/19/2005 7/15/2005 80711 842 903 8/29/2005 378608 Z66 6/19/2005 7/15/2005 80712 842 904 8/29/2005 378609 Z67 6/19/2005 7/15/2005 80713 842 905 8/29/2005 378610

Lisbon Valley Uranium Project Page 47 Technical Report

Z68 6/19/2005 7/15/2005 80714 842 906 8/29/2005 378611 Z69 6/19/2005 7/15/2005 80715 842 907 8/29/2005 378612 Z70 6/19/2005 7/15/2005 80716 842 908 8/29/2005 378613 Z71 6/19/2005 7/15/2005 80717 842 909 8/29/2005 378614 Z72 6/19/2005 7/15/2005 80718 842 910 8/29/2005 378615 Z73 6/19/2005 7/15/2005 80719 842 911 8/29/2005 378616 Z74 6/19/2005 7/15/2005 80720 842 912 8/29/2005 378617 Z75 6/19/2005 7/15/2005 80721 842 913 8/29/2005 378618 Z76 6/19/2005 7/15/2005 80722 842 914 8/29/2005 378619 Z77 6/19/2005 7/15/2005 80723 842 915 8/29/2005 378620 Z78 6/19/2005 7/15/2005 80724 842 916 8/29/2005 378621 Z79 6/19/2005 7/15/2005 80725 842 917 8/29/2005 378622 Z80 6/18/2005 7/15/2005 80754 842 947 8/29/2005 378623 Z81 6/18/2005 7/15/2005 80755 842 948 8/29/2005 378624 Z82 6/18/2005 7/15/2005 80756 842 949 8/29/2005 378625 Z83 6/18/2005 7/15/2005 80757 843 1 8/29/2005 378626 Z84 6/18/2005 7/15/2005 80758 843 2 8/29/2005 378627 Z85 6/18/2005 7/15/2005 80759 843 3 8/29/2005 378628 Z86 6/18/2005 7/15/2005 80760 843 4 8/29/2005 378629 Z87 6/18/2005 7/15/2005 80761 843 5 8/29/2005 378630 Z88 6/18/2005 7/15/2005 80762 843 6 8/29/2005 378631 Z89 6/18/2005 7/15/2005 80763 843 7 8/29/2005 378632 Z90 6/18/2005 7/15/2005 80764 843 8 8/29/2005 378633 Z91 6/18/2005 7/15/2005 80765 843 9 8/29/2005 378634 Z92 6/18/2005 7/15/2005 80766 843 10 8/29/2005 378635 Z93 6/18/2005 7/15/2005 80767 843 11 8/29/2005 378636 Z94 6/18/2005 7/15/2005 80768 843 12 8/29/2005 378637 Z95 6/18/2005 7/15/2005 80769 843 13 8/29/2005 378638 Z96 6/18/2005 7/15/2005 80770 843 14 8/29/2005 378639 Z97 6/18/2005 7/15/2005 80771 843 15 8/29/2005 378640 Z98 6/18/2005 7/15/2005 80772 843 16 8/29/2005 378641 Z99 6/18/2005 7/15/2005 80773 843 17 8/29/2005 378642 Z100 6/18/2005 7/15/2005 80774 843 18 8/29/2005 378643 Z101 6/18/2005 7/15/2005 80775 843 19 8/29/2005 378644 Z102 6/18/2005 7/15/2005 80776 843 20 8/29/2005 378645 Z103 6/18/2005 7/15/2005 80777 843 21 8/29/2005 378646 Z104 6/18/2005 7/15/2005 80778 843 22 8/29/2005 378647 Z105 6/18/2005 7/15/2005 80779 843 23 8/29/2005 378648 Z106 6/18/2005 7/15/2005 80780 843 24 8/29/2005 378649 Z107 6/18/2005 7/15/2005 80781 843 25 8/29/2005 378650 Z108 6/18/2005 7/15/2005 80782 843 26 8/29/2005 378651 Z109 6/18/2005 7/15/2005 80783 843 27 8/29/2005 378652 Z110 6/18/2005 7/15/2005 80784 843 28 8/29/2005 378653 Z111 6/18/2005 7/15/2005 80785 843 29 8/29/2005 378654 Z112 6/18/2005 7/15/2005 80786 843 30 8/29/2005 378655 Z113 6/18/2005 7/15/2005 80787 843 31 8/29/2005 378656 Z114 6/18/2005 7/15/2005 80788 843 32 8/29/2005 378657 Z115 6/18/2005 7/15/2005 80726 842 918 8/29/2005 378658 Z116 6/18/2005 7/15/2005 80789 843 33 8/29/2005 378659 Z117 6/18/2005 7/15/2005 80790 843 34 8/29/2005 378660 Z118 6/18/2005 7/15/2005 80791 843 35 8/29/2005 378661 Z119 6/18/2005 7/15/2005 80792 843 36 8/29/2005 378662 Z120 6/18/2005 7/15/2005 80793 843 37 8/29/2005 378663 Z121 6/18/2005 7/15/2005 80794 843 38 8/29/2005 378664

Lisbon Valley Uranium Project Page 48 Technical Report

Z122 6/18/2005 7/15/2005 80795 843 39 8/29/2005 378665 Z123 6/18/2005 7/15/2005 80796 843 40 8/29/2005 378666 Z124 6/18/2005 7/15/2005 80797 843 41 8/29/2005 378667 Z125 6/18/2005 7/15/2005 80798 843 42 8/29/2005 378668 Z126 6/18/2005 7/15/2005 80799 843 43 8/29/2005 378669 Z127 6/18/2005 7/15/2005 80800 843 44 8/29/2005 378670 Z128 6/18/2005 7/15/2005 80801 843 45 8/29/2005 378671 Z129 6/18/2005 7/15/2005 80802 843 46 8/29/2005 378672 X1 6/20/2005 7/15/2005 80582 842 770 8/29/2005 378673 X2 6/20/2005 7/15/2005 80583 842 773 8/29/2005 378674 X3 6/20/2005 7/15/2005 80584 842 774 8/29/2005 378675 X4 6/20/2005 7/15/2005 80585 842 775 8/29/2005 378676 X5 6/20/2005 7/15/2005 80586 842 776 8/29/2005 378677 X6 6/20/2005 7/15/2005 80587 842 777 8/29/2005 378678 X7 6/20/2005 7/15/2005 80588 842 778 8/29/2005 378679 total 605

Lisbon Valley Uranium Project Page 49 Technical Report