DOCSLIB.ORG

2019 Point-In-Time Count of Homelessness in Portland

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2019 Point-In-Time Count of Homelessness in Portland 2019 POINT-IN-TIME Count of Homelessness in Portland/Gresham/Multnomah County, Oregon 1 of 61 Contents 1. Executive Summary .................................................................................................................................... 5 2. Introduction................................................................................................................................................. 9 3. Methodology ............................................................................................................................................... 9 3.1. What the PIT Count Does and Does Not Tell Us ............................................................................... 10 4. Overall Results ......................................................................................................................................... 11 4.1. Change over Time in HUD Homelessness ........................................................................................ 11 4.1.1. Unsheltered Population .............................................................................................................. 12 4.1.2. Emergency Shelter ..................................................................................................................... 13 4.1.3. Transitional Housing ................................................................................................................... 13 4.1.4. PIT Numbers in Context: Efforts to End & Prevent Homelessness ............................................. 13 5. Demographics .......................................................................................................................................... 15 5.1. Race & Ethnicity ................................................................................................................................ 15 5.1.1. Change over Time ...................................................................................................................... 17 5.1.2. Gender ....................................................................................................................................... 21 5.1.3. Age Groups ................................................................................................................................ 22 5.2. Gender .............................................................................................................................................. 23 5.2.1. Change over Time ...................................................................................................................... 23 5.3. Age Groups ....................................................................................................................................... 24 5.3.1. Change over Time ...................................................................................................................... 25 5.4. Household Composition .................................................................................................................... 27 5.4.1. Change over Time ...................................................................................................................... 27 5.4.2. Race & Ethnicity ......................................................................................................................... 29 5.4.2.1. Change over Time ............................................................................................................... 32 5.5. Chronic Homelessness ...................................................................................................................... 33 5.5.1. Change over Time ...................................................................................................................... 34 5.5.2. Race & Ethnicity ......................................................................................................................... 35 5.5.2.1. Change over Time ............................................................................................................... 36 5.6. Disabling Conditions .......................................................................................................................... 37 5.6.1. Change over Time ...................................................................................................................... 38 5.6.1.1. Race & Ethnicity .................................................................................................................. 41 5.7. Domestic Violence ............................................................................................................................. 41 5.7.1. Change over Time ...................................................................................................................... 42 5.7.2. Gender ....................................................................................................................................... 43 5.7.3. Race & Ethnicity ......................................................................................................................... 43 5.8. Veteran Status ................................................................................................................................... 44 5.8.1. Change over Time ...................................................................................................................... 45 5.8.2. Race & Ethnicity ......................................................................................................................... 46 2 of 61 6. Additional Analysis ................................................................................................................................... 47 6.1. First-Time Homelessness .................................................................................................................. 47 6.1.1. Change over Time ...................................................................................................................... 47 6.1.2. Race & Ethnicity ......................................................................................................................... 47 6.2. Length of Time Homeless .................................................................................................................. 49 6.2.1. Change over Time ...................................................................................................................... 49 6.3. Geographic Locations ........................................................................................................................ 50 6.3.1. Change over Time ...................................................................................................................... 51 6.3.1.1. Chronic Homelessness........................................................................................................ 52 6.4. People Sleeping in Tents ................................................................................................................... 53 6.5. Migration ........................................................................................................................................... 53 6.6. Additional Demographic Analysis ...................................................................................................... 55 7. Conclusion ............................................................................................................................................... 55 8. Notes on Analytic Methodology ................................................................................................................ 56 8.1. People Missing from the PIT .............................................................................................................. 56 8.1.1. Doubled-Up Population .............................................................................................................. 56 8.1.2. Non-Participants ......................................................................................................................... 56 8.1.3. People Not Found ...................................................................................................................... 57 8.1.4. People in Hospitals, Jails & Prisons ............................................................................................ 57 8.2. Challenges of Using PIT Data for Assessing Change over Time ....................................................... 57 8.2.1. Narrow Definition of Homelessness ............................................................................................ 57 8.2.2. Other Challenges ....................................................................................................................... 58 8.3. Reporting on Race & Ethnicity ........................................................................................................... 58 8.4. De-duplication ................................................................................................................................... 58 8.5. Identifying Unsheltered Households .................................................................................................. 59 8.6. Unknown Values ............................................................................................................................... 59 9. Bibliography.............................................................................................................................................. 59 10. Appendices ..........................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • District Background
    DRAFT SOUTHEAST LIAISON DISTRICT PROFILE DRAFT Introduction In 2004 the Bureau of Planning launched the District Liaison Program which assigns a City Planner to each of Portland’s designated liaison districts. Each planner acts as the Bureau’s primary contact between community residents, nonprofit groups and other government agencies on planning and development matters within their assigned district. As part of this program, District Profiles were compiled to provide a survey of the existing conditions, issues and neighborhood/community plans within each of the liaison districts. The Profiles will form a base of information for communities to make informed decisions about future development. This report is also intended to serve as a tool for planners and decision-makers to monitor the implementation of existing plans and facilitate future planning. The Profiles will also contribute to the ongoing dialogue and exchange of information between the Bureau of Planning, the community, and other City Bureaus regarding district planning issues and priorities. PLEASE NOTE: The content of this document remains a work-in-progress of the Bureau of Planning’s District Liaison Program. Feedback is appreciated. Area Description Boundaries The Southeast District lies just east of downtown covering roughly 17,600 acres. The District is bordered by the Willamette River to the west, the Banfield Freeway (I-84) to the north, SE 82nd and I- 205 to the east, and Clackamas County to the south. Bureau of Planning - 08/03/05 Southeast District Page 1 Profile Demographic Data Population Southeast Portland experienced modest population growth (3.1%) compared to the City as a whole (8.7%).
    [Show full text]
  • HOMELESSNESS in PORTLAND: a Meta-Analysis and Recommendations for Success
    HOMELESSNESS IN PORTLAND: A Meta-analysis and Recommendations for Success Published MAY 2019 The Citizens Crime Commission of Portland is the leading voice of public safety. We are a non-profit organization dedicated to mobilizing business leaders and citizens to reduce crime, improve civility, and strengthen communities. Our efforts are driven by four core initiatives: Uniting Leaders, Better Justice Systems, Looking Beyond the Symptoms, and Business Security. TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4 FINDING AND RECOMMENDATION NO. 1 6 DEINSTITUTIONALIZATION 6 INCARCERATION 7 FOSTER CARE 8 LOW-INCOME HOUSING POLICY 9 FINDING AND RECOMMENDATION NO. 2 13 WHO ARE THE HOMELESS? 13 WHAT IS BEING DONE? 16 FINDING AND RECOMMENDATION NO. 3 21 FINDING AND RECOMMENDATION NO. 4 23 FINDING AND RECOMMENDATION NO. 5 26 FINDING AND RECOMMENDATION NO. 6 28 VILLAGES: AN INTERIM SOLUTION TO PORTLAND’S CRISIS OF HOMELESSNESS? 30 FINDING AND RECOMMENDATION NO. 7 33 THE PROMISE OF HEALTH CARE REFORM 36 FUNDING THE SUPPORTIVE COMPONENT OF PERMANENT SUPPORTIVE HOUSING 37 APPENDIX 1: INTERVIEWEES AND MEETINGS ATTENDED 39 APPENDIX 2: RECOMMENDATIONS FROM OTHER REPORTS 40 APPENDIX 3: BIBLIOGRAPHY 45 This report has been produced by the Citizens Crime Commission. The view and opinions in this report do not necessarily represent the views and opinions of the individual members of the Crime Commission. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS There have been any number of reports on homelessness nationally, regionally and here in Portland regarding the scope and scale of the challenge before us, and many excellent recommendations for how to successfully address the homelessness crisis. In keeping with the tradition of the Citizens Crime Commission, we have attempted herein to present a well-researched study that offers cost-effective recommendations for system improvement/ enhance- ment.
    [Show full text]
  • 2014 Annual Report
    2014 Annual Report www.joinpdx.org 503.232.7052 Dear Friend & Supporter, Letter Relationship and community…. from the Director these are words you will hear often at JOIN. I have had the privilege of being a part of the JOIN communi- ty for 7 years—fi rst as a community partner, then as a Board member, later a staff member, and now as the 2015 Board of Directors Executive Director. Chris Bonner, President There is one story that brings home the point of what JOIN really Hasson Company means about building relationships and cultivating community. John and I fi rst met when I was working at JOIN’s Basic Service Margaret Bryant, Vice President Center, or what we call the “House.” He had been sleeping outside Bryant Garcia Benefi t Consultants for several years, coming to JOIN for basic needs like showers, a locker to store his belongings, and community. I would often fi nd Nathan BeaƩ y, Treasurer him in the House playing dominoes, or using one of our computers Umpqua Bank to check apartment availability or connect with his family on face- book. Anna Plumb, Secretary Multnomah County John’s life has been fi lled with struggles and what he calls “bad choices.” He has a history of addiction and many encounters with Fineke Brasser law enforcement. He has children and grand-children he hasn’t Community Volunteer seen in person for years. John also has a college education, a his- tory of well-paying and high power jobs, and beautiful stories of Russ Campbell friendships and family events.
    [Show full text]
  • Multnomah County Library Collection Shrinkage—A Baseline Report
    Y T N U MULTNOMAH COUNTY LIBRARY COLLECTION SHRINKAGE—A O BASELINE REPORT H NOVEMBER 2006 A REPORT FOR THE ULTNOMAH OUNTY IBRARY M A M C L O REPORT #009-06 N T L REPORT PREPARED BY: ATT ICE RINCIPAL NALYST U M N , P A BUDGET OFFICE EVALUATION MULTNOMAH COUNTY, OREGON 503-988-3364 http://www.co.multnomah.or.us/dbcs/budget/performance/ MULTNOMAH COUNTY LIBRARY COLLECTION SHRINKAGE—A BASELINE REPORT Executive Summary In July 2005, the library administration contacted staff from the Multnomah County Budget Office Evaluation, a unit external to the Library’s internal management system, to request independent assistance estimating the amount of missing materials at the library, known in the private sector as ‘shrinkage’. While much of shrinkage can be due to theft, it is impossible to distinguish between this and misplaced or inaccurate material accounting. Results reported herein should be considered a baseline assessment and not an annualized rate. There are three general ways to categories how shrinkage occurs to the library collection: materials are borrowed by patrons and unreturned; items which cannot be located are subsequently placed on missing status; and materials missing in the inventory, where the catalog identifies them as being on the shelf, are not located after repeated searches. Each of these three ways was assessed and reported separately due to the nature of their tracking. Shrinkage was measured for all branches and outreach services and for most material types, with the exception of non-circulating reference materials, paperbacks, CD-ROMS, maps, and the special collections. This analysis reflected 1.67 million of the 2.06 million item multi-branch collection (87% of the entire collection).
    [Show full text]
  • Event Attendees Will Be Entered for a Chance to Receive Two Free Tickets to Hear Tommy Orange on March 5
    EVENTS Events are free. Visit multcolib.org for library addresses. Join your neighbors to discuss the book at a Pageturners group, sponsored by the Friends of the Library. Schedule at multcolib.org/book-groups/pageturners From Historical Trauma to Historical Wisdom: How A Generation Is Healing Wed., Jan. 15, 6:30–7:45 pm • Central Library, U.S. Bank Room The Indigenous 20-Something Project began as a movement to heal Native young adults from the lasting impacts of intergenerational trauma caused by colonization. In this interactive talk, Shalene Joseph (A’aniih, Athabascan) and Josh Cocker (Ka’igwu, Tongan) will share their perspectives on the power of historical wisdom to create resilience, hope and community connection. Native Story Hour Sat., Jan. 25, 12–1 pm • North Portland Library Sat., Feb. 8, 2–3 pm • Holgate Library Sat., Feb. 29, 11 am–12 pm • Troutdale Library Come sing, listen, learn and celebrate. Join Karen Kitchen (Osage Nation) for this story hour featuring songs and books from Native cultures. Children, families, elders, aunties and uncles — everyone is welcome. Light refreshments will be served. An Intimate Evening with Katherine Paul of Black Belt Eagle Scout Wed., Jan. 29, 7–8 pm • Native American Student and Community Center 710 SW (andrew) Jackson St., Portland (PSU campus) Join singer-songwriter Katherine Paul (Swinomish, Iñupiaq) for an evening of music and conversation with her mother, Patricia Paul, J.D. Made possible by The Library Foundation through support from The Confederated Tribes of the Grand Ronde Fund. Celilo Collaborations: Sharing the Stories of a Place and Its People Wed., Feb.
    [Show full text]
  • Dignity Village Contract L2-13 Page I Of22- ¡Evised I0/19/12 L Scope of Services the Contractor Shall Provide the Following Services
    OIÌDINANCB No. Authorize contract with Dignity Village to manage transitional housing campground at Sunderland Yard (Ordirlance; Contract No. 32000680) The City of Portland ordains: Section l. 'fhe Council finds: 1 . I-he City of Portland has designated a portion of property owned by the City, commonly known as Sunderland Yard, located at9325 NE Sunderland Road, Tax Lot 100 1NlE12B (Tax Account R-3 15 196), as a campground under the terms of ORS 446.265. Resolutio¡ No. 36200, passed February 26, 2004. 2. Dignity Village is an Oregon non-profit corporation, formed for the purpose of developing alternative approaches to addressing homelessltess. Local religious organizations, schools, philanthropists, architects, and others have contributed to helping Dignity Village with its alternatives. Representatives from Dignity Village have worked with architects to develop transitional housing structures to comply with the requirements of Oregon law. 3. The City ol'Portland desires to have someone provide management services for the designated transitional housing campground at Sunderland Yard. Dignity Village is willing to continue providing this management service. Dignity Village will provide a unique and coordinated services program, as developed by Dignity Village. There is no other potential provider for the range of services with the experience, expertise, and capability of Dignity Village. It therefore is appropriate for the City to contract with Dignity Village for continued provision of management services for the designated campground at Sunderland Yard. 4. In providing management services for the transitional housing campground, Dignity Village will provide a supportive environment to address the issues that led residents to becoming homeless and will seek to offer residents with job training opportunities, continuing education opportunities, healthcare, and housing placement assistance.
    [Show full text]
  • Visit Andrew's Websites
    Homeless Housing Alternatives “From Self-Organized Camps to Tiny House Villages” Andrew Heben Forum in Humboldt County Saturday, November 15, 2014 (11am to 3pm) Eureka Woman’s Club-1531 J Street Tent City Urbanism “From Self-Organized Camps to Tiny House Villages” explores the intersection of the "tiny house movement" and tent cities organized by the homeless to present an accessible and sustainable housing paradigm that can improve the quality of life for everyone. While tent cities tend to evoke either sympathy or disgust, the author finds such informal settlements actually address many of the shortfalls of more formal responses to homelessness. Tent cities often exemplify self-management, direct democracy, tolerance, mutual aid, and resourceful strategies for living with less. This book presents a vision for how cities can constructively build upon these positive dynamics rather than continuing to seek evictions and pay the high costs of policing homelessness. The tiny house village provides a path forward to transitional and affordable housing within the grasp of a local community. It offers a bottom-up approach to the provision of shelter that is economically, socially, and environmentally sustainable—both for the individual and the city. The concept was first pioneered by Portland's Dignity Village, and has since been re-imagined by Eugene's Join Us in Creating These New Opportunity Village and Olympia's Quixote Village. Now this innovative model has emerged from the Northwest to inspire projects in Madison, Austin, and Community Based Alternatives Ithaca, and is being pursued by advocacy groups throughout the country. AHHA-HumCo Andrew Heben is an urban planner, writer, and tiny house builder based in Affordable Homeless Housing Alternatives Eugene, Oregon.
    [Show full text]
  • Town Hall #1 Event Summary
    Comprehensive Plan Town Hall #1 Event Summary Overview The first of three Milwaukie Comprehensive Plan Update town halls took place on April 4, 2018 in the Waldorf School gymnasium. Around 120 community members participated in the event. The town hall began with introductory presentations followed by small-group discussions on the four policy areas under review in Block 1: • Economic development • Urban growth management • History, arts and culture • Community engagement Simultaneous translation was offered for Spanish-speaking community members, and one breakout group was conducted in Spanish. Before the event adjourned, representatives from the community and Comprehensive Plan Advisory Committee (CPAC) reported out one “big idea” from each breakout table. In addition to the small group discussions, attendees had the opportunity to provide feedback on all four topics through a comment form. In total, the city received 25 comment forms. Welcome and introductory remarks The town hall began with introductory remarks by Mayor Mark Gamba. He thanked attendees for taking part in this important effort, which continues the work begun through the community visioning process. Mayor Gamba explained that the adoption of an updated Comprehensive Plan is a crucial step toward realizing Milwaukie’s Community Vision. Planning Director Denny Egner provided an overview of the comprehensive planning process. Denny explained the Comprehensive Plan includes policies, maps and ancillary plans that reflect and are consistent with Milwaukie’s Vision and Action Plan, state and regional goals, and community input. The plan is implemented through development and zoning codes as well as through city projects and programs. Topic-specific feedback Notetakers from all 13 breakout discussions recorded feedback on flip charts during the event.
    [Show full text]
  • Framework for Future Library Spaces Final Report | June 16, 2017 With
    Framework for Future Library Spaces Final Report | June 16, 2017 with 921 SW Washington Street Suite 250 Portland OR 97205 T: 503.227.4860 G4 16482-01 CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS......................................................................................................i ENDORSEMENTS ...........................................................................................................iii Future Libraries Community Action Committee .................................................................iii Multnomah County Library Advisory Board ........................................................................ v EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ....................................................................................................1 Project Purpose and Process Summary ............................................................................... 1 Future Libraries Vision and Framework Summary .............................................................. 2 OF CONTENTS TABLE Recommendations Summary ............................................................................................... 3 Next Steps Summary ........................................................................................................... 4 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................5 Project Background ............................................................................................................. 5 Project Purpose ..................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Before the Multnomah County Library District Board
    BEFORE THE MULTNOMAH COUNTY LIBRARY DISTRICT BOARD RESOLUTION NO. 2017-057 Adopting the Multnomah County Library Space Planning Framework. The Multnomah County Library District (MCLD) Board Finds: a. Established in 1864, today's Multnomah County Library is one of the busiest, best and most beloved public library systems in the United States. b. The library offers a wide range of resources, services and personal assistance to people of all ages. c. The library commenced a space planning process in July 2016, engaging nearly 4,000 residents, community leaders, partner agencies, educators and nonprofits for input and carefully reviewed use patterns, demographic data and industry best practices. d. The physical structure of this system began in the Andrew Carnegie era, when libraries served vastly different purposes than today. e. Multnomah County Library's library spaces total just 260,000 square feet, a rate of just over 0.3 square feet per capita. Other Oregon library systems offer up to three times that amount per capita. f. All 19 Multnomah County libraries, plus library office and storage space, would fit into Seattle's downtown library. g. Growth projections show an increase of population to more than 910,000 in Multnomah County by 2035. h. Demographic data show increasing needs in east Portland and east Multnomah County, which offers just 25% of total library space, yet is home to 40% of residents. The Multnomah County Library District Board Resolves: 1. Adopt the findings of Multnomah County Library Framework for Future Library Spaces, authored by Group 4 Architecture. 2. Envision a resulting system of libraries that provides modern and adequate spaces for people across Multnomah County.
    [Show full text]
  • Community in Property: Lessons from Tiny Homes Villages
    COMMUNITY IN PROPERTY: LESSONS FROM TINY HOMES VILLAGES Lisa T. Alexander* The evolving role of community in property law remains undertheorized. While legal scholars have analyzed the commons, common interest communities, and aspects of the sharing economy, the recent rise of intentional co-housing communities remains relatively understudied. This Article provides a case study of tiny homes villages for the homeless and unhoused, as examples of communities that highlight the growing importance of flexibility and community in contemporary property law. These communities develop new housing tenures and property relationships that challenge the predominance of individualized, exclusionary, long-term, fee simple-ownership in contemporary property law. The villages, therefore, demonstrate property theories that challenge the hegemony of ownership in property law, such as progressive property theory, property as personhood theory, access versus ownership theories, stewardship, and urban commons theories in action. The property forms and relationships these villages create not only ameliorate homelessness, but also illustrate how communal relationships can provide more stability than ownership during times of uncertainty. Due to increasing natural disasters and other unpredictable phenomena, municipalities may find these property forms adaptable and, therefore, useful in mitigating increasing housing insecurity and instability. This case study also provides examples of successful stakeholder collaboration between groups that often conflict in urban redevelopment. These insights reveal a new role for community in property law, and are instructive for American governance and property law and theory. *Copyright © 2019 by Lisa T. Alexander, Professor of Law, Texas A&M University School of Law, with Joint Appointment in Texas A&M University’s Department of Landscape Architecture and Urban Planning.
    [Show full text]
  • Property Tax Measure Review Ballot Measure 26-211 Multnomah County Library GO Bonds September 10, 2020
    Property Tax Measure Review District Multnomah County 26-211 Bonds to Expand, Renovate, Construct Library Branches, Ballot Measure Facilities; Increase Safety (attached to this review) $387 million GO Bonds and an estimated tax rate of $0.61 per Financial Details $1k AV with a 9-year term Election November 3, 2020 Hearing Date and Time September 22 @ 10:00 Commissioner Discussion September 15 @ 2:00 Date Review Prepared September 10, 2020 Background This Bond Measure’s formal origins date back to July, 2016. That was when the County Commissioners established a Citizen Action Committee to study the ability of the County’s 18 libraries to serve the community. A year later, in its “Library Framework” report, the Committee stated the primary issue succinctly: “The issue for Multnomah County Library is that it simply lacks space.”1 The Committee stated that the library facilities service level amounted to 0.3 square feet per capita system wide, and only 0.19 square feet per capita in East County as shown in the graphic below. The Committee recommended enlarging total library space to 0.7 to 0.8 square feet per capita and specifically adding more library space in East County. From that work comes the core of this ballot measure. 1 Library Space Planning Framework, June 16, 2017 https://multcolib.org/sites/default/files/Multnomah_County_Library_space_planning_framework_FINAL.pdf Property Tax Measure Review Ballot Measure 26-211 Multnomah County Library GO Bonds September 10, 2020 Purpose This bond measure seeks taxpayer approval to issue up to $387 million in General Obligation Bonds, the debt service for which will be paid for with a property tax levy that the County estimates will be $0.61 per $1,000 of Assessed Value with a term of not more than 9 years.
    [Show full text]