Let's Stop Calling Countries "Markets"

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Let's Stop Calling Countries Let's Stop Calling Countries "Markets" Robin Broad Here’s my most recent — and, I believe, imminently winnable — campaign: Let’s stop calling countries “markets” or “economies.” And while we’re at it, let’s not call any set of countries “emerging markets.” It seems like a small thing – the change in terminology from “countries” and “people” to “markets” and “economies.” But it makes countries and people – in all their diverse reality – disappear. And it puts an unspoken premium on places that are buying lots of goods from U.S. corporations. Some of us slip into this terminology ourselves, from time to time, without even thinking. But, when I hear my colleagues and students use it, I find myself cringing for all that is unsaid between the lines. And I cringed even more at a recent Washington, D.C. event when an Obama government official proudly introduced herself as someone with “emerging market” expertise. I find that knowing the history of the term “emerging markets” helps me stop using it. So, here goes: Perhaps the first use of the term “emerging” was in fact a positive one (as far as I’m concerned) – coming from the 1955 Bandung Conference, best known for leading to the establishment of the Non­Aligned Movement. At that point, the new “emerging” powers or nations or countries referred to former colonies gaining independence. Indonesian President Sukarno’s vision was that these “new emerging forces” would rival the colonial forces at places like the United Nations. But what a difference almost three decades makes. Jump ahead to 1981 and the onset of the reign of free­market fundamentalism – when a man named Antoine van Agtmael coined the term “emerging market economy” as an alternative to “developing country.” And van Agtmael’s perch?: Deputy director of the capital markets department of the International Finance Corporation, the private­sector arm of the World Bank Group in Washington, D.C. A side note: “Emerging markets” also was used by some after the collapse of the Soviet Union to refer to the “2nd world,” the former Soviet republics and satellites that were said to be “emerging” from socialism or communism to private­sector capitalism. (These are now more commonly referred to as “transition” economies.) Back to the main plot: In the mid­1990s, van Agtmael’s “emerging markets” became even more defined and popularized – thanks to Bill Clinton’s activist Commerce Department under the leadership of Ron Brown. The term is typically associated with Jeffrey Garten, Brown’s Undersecretary of Commerce, and author of a speech (and later a book) entitled “The Big Emerging Markets.” The U.S. government’s concern wasn’t the poor and marginalized or poverty reduction in these poorer nations, but rather the roughly 10 countries “with the greatest potential for future export growth” (as Secretary Brown phrased it). As President Clinton explained: “We have especially tried to target … not just our traditional markets, but … the markets of the 21st century…. [W]e have unashamedly been an active partner in helping our business enterprises to win contracts abroad.”[1] And so “emerging from what and to what?” was turned on its head. “Emerging” to become even better markets for products of global corporations (in Garten’s version, U.S.­based corporations, of course). So, while it may sound subtle, it’s a decided shift. Countries, and their people, are transformed into current or future consumers. What should we call them? Well, at a minimum “countries.” We have a series of unsatisfactory terms – Third World, South, underdeveloped, developing, majority world – but none as bad as “emerging markets.” It’s a sad commentary that we don’t have better, more precise analytical terms to use. But even low­income and middle­income countries are better than “emerging.” And, if one wants to analyze these approximately 140 Third World countries in relation to the global economy, one can do so far more analytically from the perspective of their position in the international division of labor in the post­ World War II period: (1) those locked into primary product (agricultural and mineral) export; (2) those, like South Korea, who have broken out of the so­called “colonial division of labor” and into higher value­added manufactured exports; (3) those that manufacture and export only a few labor­intensive stages of a global assembly line, such as apparel and consumer electronics assembled by often­exploited workers (think Bangladesh garments); and (4) the oil­exporting nations. Arguably, India and China demand their own categories. Speaking of China and India, let’s also refrain from the term BRICs (initially for Brazil, Russia, India, and China, with South Africa later added), a term born in 2001 in Goldman Sachs’ asset management division. Beyond its birthright, the category is not that useful since each of those countries is so different. Whatever categories or names we use for countries, we of course need to distinguish between governments, private sectors, and civil society as well as within each. For example, so­called “emerging market” Brazil doesn’t think or do something in aggregate terms. The Brazilian government might. Or Brazilian elites might. Or the landless in Brazil might. My main point: Let’s stop using the terminology of free­market economists or corporate­friendly government bureaucrats – who see (and term) the world through lenses of potential dollar signs –to talk about the diversity of the countries where the majority of the world’s population lives. At a minimum, they deserve their rightful status as full­ fledged “countries” full of real­life people with a wide range of backgrounds and experiences. Triple Crisis Welcomes Your Comments. Please Share Your Thoughts Below. [1] Both quotes are from Jeffrey E. Garten, “The Big Emerging Markets,” Columbia Journal of World Business, (1996), vol. 31, no. 2, p.7. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022542896900204 Twitter Facebook Del.icio.us Reddit February 13, 2013 | Posted in: Uncategorized | 4 Comments » 4 Responses to “Let's Stop Calling Countries "Markets"” 1. emerging markets says: February 17, 2013 at 4:36 am Hello I wish to to share a comment here concerning you to definitely be able to inform you just how much i personally Loved this particular study. I have to elope in order to aTurkey Day time Supper but desired to leave ya an easy comment. We preserved you Same goes with be returning subsequent function to read more of yer quality articles. Keep up the quality work. 2. Buzzwords: Responsible Mining » TripleCrisis says: September 3, 2013 at 9:01 am […] should certainly be on that list. And the avalanche of new buzzwords and fuzzwords continues: emerging markets, inclusive growth, […] 3. Buzzwords: Responsible MiningSurvive Food Crisis – Do you need to read it? | Survive Food Crisis ­ Do you need to read it? says: September 18, 2013 at 5:10 am […] should certainly be on that list. And the avalanche of new buzzwords and fuzzwords continues: emerging markets, inclusive growth, […] 4. Jenigma says: June 13, 2014 at 7:37 am I’ve always felt uncomfortable about the term emerging, as it seems to disregard the histories and individualities of diverse countries, but I thank you for articulating more clearly why ’emerging markets’ is a horrible, dehumanising term. As a side note, I would also add that ‘Arab Awakening’ is horrifically colonial in its implication that affected countries have been ‘asleep’ prior to us hearing a call for Western liberalism. Economists View Global Economic IIED's Due South .
Recommended publications
  • Yale SOM Impact Philanthropy Report 2016-17.Pdf
    Impact Support for the Yale School of Management 2016– 2017 Contents A Culture of Innovation 2 Yale SOM Boards and Councils 18 Paying Tribute 5 Giving to the Yale School of Management 26 Giving Back 12 Beinecke Society 45 Making an Impact 14 Ways to Volunteer 46 Financial Report 17 On the cOver: a detail from Adrian Schiess’s site-specific Painting (2013), framing student breakout rooms on the north side of Bekenstein Atrium. Photo by Tony Rinaldo. When I speak with new students, I frequently talk about how the “and” in the Yale School of Management’s mission to educate leaders for business and society is an essential and meaningful conjunction. It is a small word, and an easy one to overlook beside its polysyllabic neighbors, but it signals that the most vexing problems confronting us on the planet will require the best ideas across all sectors of the economy and all regions of the world. Our integrated curriculum combines multiple perspectives and academic disciplines to bring organizational challenges into clearer focus. Our community, similarly, brings together people from a remarkable diversity of backgrounds who pursue wide- ranging interests. The power of conjunction is evident every day in the classroom, when students contribute new insights and points of view gathered from experiences around the globe. And the spirit of combination extends to our faculty, whose team- teaching in our courses and scholarly collaboration with colleagues often spans disciplinary boundaries. The result is both a better framework for understanding the most significant and meaningful challenges in the real world and an environment that encourages new ideas.
    [Show full text]
  • Chairman Mary L. Schapiro Public Calendar, 2010
    Chairman Mary L. Schapiro Public Calendar 2010 Friday, January 1, 2010 SEC closed for New Year’s Day Monday, January 4, 2010 9:30 am Meeting with staff 10:30 am Meeting with staff 12:00 pm Lunch with FDIC Chairman Sheila Bair, FDIC 2:00 pm Meeting with staff 2:30 pm Meeting with Commissioner and staff 4:00 pm Meeting with staff 5:00 pm Meeting with staff Tuesday, January 5, 2010 9:30 am Meeting with staff 11:00 am Meeting with staff 1:00 pm Meeting with staff 5:00 pm Meeting with staff Wednesday, January 6, 2010 9:30 am Meeting with Commissioner and staff 12:30 pm Press interview with Marcy Gordon, Associated Press 2:30 pm Meeting with staff 3:00 pm Meeting with Commissioner and staff Thursday, January 7, 2010 9:00 am Meeting with staff 10:30 am Meeting with staff 11:00 am Meeting with staff 1:30 pm Meeting with staff 2:00 pm Closed Commission meeting Friday, January 8, 2010 10:00 am Meeting with staff 2:00 pm Meeting with Joel Seligman, President, University of Rochester Monday, January 11, 2010 9:30 am Oral argument 2:30 pm Meeting with staff 3:30 pm Meeting with staff 1 Tuesday, January 12, 2010 10:00 am Meeting with staff 2:00 pm Meeting with staff Wednesday, January 13, 2010 10:00 am Open Commission meeting 2:00 pm Meeting with Yahoo! Inc., including: Roy Bostock, Chairman, Board of Directors; Michael Callahan, General Counsel; Mindy Heppberger, Deputy General Counsel, Corporate Governance; Margaret Stewart Nagle, Director, Government Affairs 3:00 pm Stop by the Division of Enforcement’s town hall meeting 4:00 pm Meeting with staff Thursday, January 14, 2010 9:00 am Testify before the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission on “Causes and Current State of the Financial Crisis” 1:30 pm Meeting with staff 2:00 pm Closed Commission meeting Friday, January 15, 2010 8:30 am Meeting with Inspector General 10:00 am Photo shoot with Money 11:30 am Meeting with PCAOB Acting Chairman Daniel Goelzer 1:30 pm Meeting with Commissioner 2:30 pm Meeting with Commissioner 4:00 pm Meeting with staff Monday, January 18, 2010 SEC closed for the Birthday of Martin Luther King, Jr.
    [Show full text]
  • Bized, May/June 2009, Full Issue
    Bi EdMAY/JUNE 2009 Financial Guru z Jeffrey Garten It’s Time For a Change Business Schools Take New Roads To Learning Shaping the Future Of Higher Education New_JIE_biz_ed_fp_v5 11/24/08 12:32 PM Page 1 Bi Ed More Knowledge. More Insight. z More Confidence. MAY/JUNE 2009 VOLUME VIII, ISSUE 3 8 Contents Now more than ever, your students need accurate, in-depth analysis to make critical decisions about their careers and their lives. 872 DepartMENTS FEATURES 3224 Count on The Wall Street Journal to deliver what's needed 6 From the Editors 16 A Return to Reality 32 It’s Time to Shape the Finance expert and Yale professor Future of Education to make the right decisions with confidence. 8 Headlines Jeffrey Garten argues for an expanded Larry Penley calls for business 52 Research business curriculum to better prepare schools to lead higher education students to operate within a drastically through change. To learn how The Journal can benefit you and your students, 60 Technology changed business environment. 64 Your Turn 40 Virtual Solutions visit ProfessorJournal.com 24 Next-Generation Education New collaborative technologies 66 Bookshelf Business schools view themselves— make online executive education 68 Calendar and their curricula—in new ways more customized and interactive. as they place greater emphasis on 70 Classifieds experiential learning, leadership, 46 Pillars of Virtue 72 Spotlight and personal development. Such Jonathan Schonsheck discusses reinvention is moving business what he can—and can’t—do to schools into the 21st century. turn business graduates into Cover photo ethical executives. by David Johnson © 2009 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Ina Garten a Subpoena
    Ina Garten A Subpoena Crinated and sequent Clemmie never hallmark tonetically when Rinaldo overexerts his antiquarianism. Memphian Wyndham redden that heartburn tipple inby and shores inanimately. Stanislaw schematised his slugfest seesaws significantly or insufferably after Todd amortising and shadow honorably, mucid and bloodthirsty. Side with ina garten subpoena, the latest developments in your interests to your tv service, ina garten a subpoena documents on flipboard, things apple pie is an office of course of! Garten designed and some external resources that has an instructor that matter of supported barack obama to fill that music reviews and ina garten? Budget and ina? She has an above the decision to get hired by. See your interests to subpoena, ina was it? You wish foundation thing rarely gets all! Telling us online request to tell him caring too many of bean was last night sweats, showtimes and a subpoena documents on or join me! He got ours from us from high demand programming and conditions along. If ina garten, ina garten a subpoena requiring her devotion to recreate the. Sports are tedious and to remove that beans play in london episode she did a health issue preclusion by ina garten has ears, commercial information transmitted to invite. Only access to create an inside out bitch, and try again, a hundred dollars on! But then frank bruni on a subpoena is paula deen, vinyasa flow and happens to. Even after one place for ina lacks, the subpoena yet another layer thin wedges described in spokane, ina garten a subpoena. Part of ina garten subpoena yet another take that information, ina garten a subpoena yet to increase the.
    [Show full text]
  • Conference Brochure
    THINK DIFFERENT Learn creative, effective and scalable strategies that deliver results. SHRM 2011 STRATEGY CONFERENCE PROGRAM October 5–7, 2011 | Chicago, IL Fairmont Chicago Millennium Park www.shrm.org/conferences/strategy TABLE OF CONTENTS Conference at a Glance 1 Concurrent Sessions at a Glance 2 Wednesday, October 5 4 Thursday, October 6 7 Friday, October 7 11 Recertification Credit Form 13 Networking Opportunities 14 Things to Do in Chicago 15 Conference Map 16 Your Notes 18 Note The statements, views and opinions expressed in the educational programs offered at the SHRM Strategy Conference are those of the speakers, not of SHRM, and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions held by SHRM or its affiliates. CONFERENCE at A GLANCE* Tuesday, October 4 Noon–6:00 p.m. SOLD OUT! Preconference Session: Lead with Your Customer: Transform Brand and Culture into World-Class Excellence, Part I** Wednesday, October 5 7:00 a.m.–Noon SOLD OUT! Preconference Session: Lead with Your Customer: Transform Brand and Culture into World-Class Excellence, Part II** 8:30 a.m.–6:00 p.m. Registration & SHRMStore® 1:30 p.m.–3:00 p.m. Concurrent Sessions 3:30 p.m.–5:00 p.m. Opening General Session Featuring Bill Conaty 5:00 p.m. Book Signing with Bill Conaty 5:00 p.m.–6:00 p.m. Opening Reception 6:30 p.m. Meet to Eat Thursday, October 6 7:00 a.m.–6:00 p.m. Registration & SHRMStore® 7:30 a.m.–8:30 a.m. Networking Breakfast 8:30 a.m.–10:30 a.m.
    [Show full text]
  • The Birthplace of Globalisation Prof. Jeffrey Garten, Yale University Well
    The Valentia Lecture 2017 VALENTIA – The birthplace of globalisation Prof. Jeffrey Garten, Yale University Well the first thing I want to do is I want to thank Leonard for sending me an email out of the clear blue, it must have been about six months ago, asking me to come here and I have been to Ireland several times but never this far west and I just thought it would be a wonderful thing to do. I think the reason you invited me was I had written a book, not really about Ireland, it’s called ‘From Silk to Silicon’ and it’s about ten people who gave globalisation a gigantic boost. I looked over a thousand years and I picked ten people who did something that was so spectacular that they changed the world that they lived in and that what they did continues to have reverberations in our time. So, I spent a year just reading global history, I’m not a historian and you know it was both exciting and really exhausting. As I read about the last thousand years, I identified ten people and I had to have some criteria, and in addition to really making globalisation much bigger and deeper than it was before their times, I wanted to pick people who rolled up their sleeves and did something as opposed to just having had an idea,and one of the people I chose was Cyrus Field. I think that’s why you asked me to come here so I do want to talk a little bit about Cyrus Field and I’d like to put him into, you know, a broader context.
    [Show full text]
  • Lessons for the Next Financial Crisis
    FOREIGN AFFAIRS MARCH/APRIL 1999 Lessons for the Next Financial Crisis Jeffrey E. Garten Volume 78 • Number 2 The contents of Foreign Affairs are copyrighted. © 1999 Council on Foreign Relations, Inc. All rights reserved. Lessons for the Next Financial Crisis Jeffrey E. Garten learning from the asian debacle The turmoil in Brazil in January was grim evidence that the global financial crisis that began in Thailand in June 1997 is far from over. Brazil showed that the international community has a long way to go to make the world economy more resistant to the kinds of shocks that have been occurring with increasing regularity. In fact, a recent series of intensive oª-the-record discussions with a number of top Washington o⁄cials and Wall Street executives who have played crucial roles in the various rescue eªorts—speaking not only in their constraining o⁄cial capacities but also giving their private views—show that while there is some consensus about what happened and why, the major players are badly split over what must now be done. It is as if the global economy has just had a prolonged heart attack. The systemic failure was a total surprise to the doctors, all of whom had previously pronounced the patient not only healthy but robust. But the injured party is still in intensive care, and the physicians are arguing among themselves about the diagnosis and prescription. To be fair, no one ever really had a clear picture of the global financial system, even before today’s crisis-ridden uncertainties. It is not just that over $1.5 trillion in currency changes hands every day, nor that Jeffrey E.
    [Show full text]
  • Central Issues in American Foreign Policy
    Columbia University Political Science W4825 Fall 2005 CENTRAL ISSUES IN AMERICAN FOREIGN POLICY Lectures: Mon., Wed., 2:40-3:55 Professor Stuart Gottlieb Office Hours: Mon., 12:30-2:00, 1315 IAB [email protected] The United States does not have a choice as to whether it will or will not play a great part in the world. Fate has made that choice for us. The only question is whether we will play that part well or badly. ––Theodore Roosevelt Description This course examines the sources, substance, and enduring themes of American foreign policy, with a special focus on the post-Cold War era. Part I reviews the rise of American power in world affairs from the 18th Century through the end of the Cold War. Part II provides an overview of the process and politics of American foreign policy making. Part III applies the theory and history of Part I, and the process of Part II, to examine a number of contemporary U.S. foreign policy issues and debates, including America’s two wars with Iraq; how the U.S. should deal with other “rogue” states; America’s responses to the threat of global terrorism and the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction; and what role the U.S. should play in the world economy, global and regional institutions, and the developing world. Requirements Grading will be based on the results of a take-home midterm exam (optional for graduate students); a policy memorandum paper; and a cumulative three-hour final exam. The midterm questions, covering Parts I and II of the course, will be handed out at the end of class on Wednesday, Oct.
    [Show full text]
  • A Return to Reality
    A Return to Reality by Tricia Bisoux ven with his years of experience in investment, finance, and public policy, Jeffrey Garten got it wrong—and he isn’t afraid to admit it. But then, so did just about every- body. In fact, the fall of Lehman Brothers and the subse- Equent collapse of the global markets has led Garten to change his mind about a number of issues—including the role of business in the world. “In the past, I was guilty Jeffrey Garten discusses the lessons of Lehman of having exaggerated what business can do,” he says. “As Brothers, the importance of public policy, strong a case as there is for a and the need for a three-year MBA. broader business education, there is a much bigger case for better education of public service officials, because they are the ones who must set the framework.” Garten has had a front row seat to the global economy, where he has watched just how much business and public policy interact. He has worked with government, serving on the White House Council on International Economic Policy under President Rich- ard Nixon and as Under Secretary of Commerce for International Trade under President Bill Clinton. In the 1980s, he worked on Wall Street as managing director of first Lehman Brothers and then the Blackstone Group. In 1995, he was named dean of the Yale School of Management in New Haven, Connecticut, a posi- tion he held until 2005. 16 BizEd MAY/JUNE 2009 MAY/JUNE 2009 photographs by David Johnson BizEd 17 The crowd is often wrong.
    [Show full text]
  • Collective Wisdom of Executives Worldwide
    annual report 2005 Collective Wisdom of Executives Worldwide annual essay Douglass North on Leadership in an Uncertain World “A bend in the road is not the end of the road, unless you fail to make the turn. For business leaders, the key is to identify the bend in the road very early, to prepare changes in strategy. The Conference Board provides a world-class forum for business leaders to discuss new trends and burning issues. It helps evolve practices and standards that enable the smooth functioning of mar- kets. Most importantly, The Conference Board’s work enables us to share and understand best practices across industries, countries and corporations.” Nandan Nilekani CEO, President and Managing Director of Infosys Vice Chairman of The Conference Board 2 the conference board 2005 annual report Leaders Working Together to Strengthen Performance and Values To grow and thrive in an ever-changing business climate, leaders need great ideas they can use today. We believe that ideas that work come from building the right relationships with the right people. Leaders need a place where they can hone their ideas with trusted peers who offer experienced, practical advice — and expect the same in return. Where a diverse mix of perspectives draws out the most useful problem-solving insights from the most unexpected places. Where they participate in a global conversation with one ground rule: Challenge all assumptions in favor of what actually works. The Conference Board brings respected economic and management experts together with experienced leaders in business, government and academia to create an unrivaled global community of leaders who bring their collective wisdom to bear on today’s most pressing business, economic and social concerns.
    [Show full text]
  • Business & Foreign Policy
    FOREIGN AFFAIRS MAY/ JUNE 1997 Business and Foreign Policy Jeffrey E. Garten Volume 76 • Number 3 The contents of Foreign Affairs are copyrighted. © 1997 Council on Foreign Relations, Inc. All rights reserved. Business and Foreign Policy Jeffrey E. Garten destination unknown Throughout most of American history, commercial interests have played a central role in foreign policy, and vice versa. During the next few decades the interaction between them will become more intense, more important, more di⁄cult to manage, and more complicated for the American public to understand. The second Clinton administration should lay out a framework for this interaction to provide the necessary guide for setting priorities, making di⁄cult tradeoªs between economic and foreign policy issues, and gaining popular support. In mid-1997 it is not clear where either Washington or the American business community is headed. The president’s first term ended on a note of ambiguity. The early enthusiasm for aggressive trade negoti- ations—for nafta and gatt and with Japan—was absent in the 1996 election as trade liberalization, possibly the administration’s greatest accomplishment, was nowhere on the political agenda. High-profile trade missions had wound down even before the death of Secretary of Commerce Ronald H. Brown in a plane crash while on a mission to Bosnia in early 1996. A Republican Congress made it a high prior- ity to eviscerate the Department of Commerce, the Overseas Private Investment Corporation, and the Export-Import Bank in the name of slashing “corporate welfare,” and campaign contributions from Jeffrey E. Garten, the Under Secretary of Commerce for Interna- tional Trade from 1993 to 1995, is Dean of the Yale School of Manage- ment.
    [Show full text]
  • Yale Veterans Summit April 10-11, 2015 New Haven, Connecticut
    YALE VETERANS SUMMIT APRIL 10-11, 2015 NEW HAVEN, CONNECTICUT Bridging the Divide The Way Forward in U.S. Civil-Military Relations The Yale Veterans Summit is made possible by the generous support of our sponsors. TOM OPLADEN ’66 FRED NAGLE ’66 LUTHER I. REPLOGLE FOUNDATION 2 Welcome Message Throughout America’s history, Yale has maintained a strong tradition of service to the nation, even before the United States was a country. Esteemed Yale alumnus Nathan Hale epitomized this tradition by proclaiming, “I only regret that I have but one life to lose for my country” during the American Revolutionary War. Thousands of Yale graduates have gone on to exemplify the words of Nathan Hale by dedicating their talents to a higher calling, participating in efforts to preserve peace and freedom throughout the nation and around the world. For generations, this spirit of service to the country has been captured by the resounding conclusion to Yale’s traditional college song, Bright College Years: “For God, For Country, and for Yale!” In 1916, Yale sophomore F. Trubee Davison launched what would become the first naval air reserve unit in U.S. military history. This move helped set the path for Yale graduates to assume the highest responsibilities of command, citizenship, and government during the 20th century and beyond. During World War II, entire classes from the “Greatest Generation” left the university for years to answer their country's call to service. Many never returned back to Yale, and others came back to finish their studies on an accelerated schedule. Yale students and faculty challenged established practices during the Vietnam War, but facilitated conversations that enhanced the effectiveness of military policy by encouraging diversity in the ranks and restraint for unchecked use of military force.
    [Show full text]