DOCSLIB.ORG

Paths to Immortality and Back Always Easy to Establish Permanent Cell from T.B.L

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

-"21-'-6-------------------NEWSANDVIEWS----------.......l.::N::::!.Aru~RE~v(~Jl"'-.. 308"""__"'_15_'!MA=RC'_'H:!....!.!I9842:! Ceo proliferation vivo, which seems quite plausible because selection for immortality per se will not begin until normal clonal lifespan is ex­ hausted, it could explain why it is not Paths to immortality and back always easy to establish permanent cell from T.B.L. Kirkwood lines from tumour biopsies and why tumor­ igenesis itself sometimes seems a hit-or­ RECENT exciting developments in the hybridized with three simian virus 40 miss phenomenon. characterization of cellular and viral on­ (SV40)-transformed cell lines and with a So what of the mechanism limiting nor­ cogenes show that the immortalization of variety of cell lines (including HeLa) deriv­ mal cell division? If it contributes to the mammalian cells is an important feature of ed from malignant tumours, in all cases the ageing of the organism as a whole, it must their progression from normality to phenotype of immortality was recessive, be understood in an evolutionary context 4 malignancyl .2 . This finding makes natural although variant immortal cells did arise at as much as in any other • The popular view sense; populations of normal cells exhibit low frequency (around 1 in 105) within of ageing as an adaptive mechanism to pre­ only finite division potential when grown in some of the non-proliferating hybrid vent overcrowding and promote species' culture, and it is commonly held that there populations. These results confirm and adaptability, which lends direct support to is an intrinsic limit to cell proliferation that significantly extend earlier reports of the the hypothesis of programmed cell death, must be overcome in vivo before a cancer dominance of mortality over immortality is regarded by most evolutionary biologists can be formed. (But immortality is not ab­ in human cell hybrids7-9 • as untenablel2. On the other hand, there is solutely required; if the potential for cell More strikingly, Pereira-Smith and quite good support for the view that ageing division is great enough a lethal tumour can Smith have also found that in fusions bet­ is the consequence of the energy-saving be found without it.) At the same time, it is ween some pairs of immortal cell lines, strategy of not repairing cellular damage widely believed that the limited growth of growth is finite but that in others, all too weIl 4•13 • This 'disposable soma' hypo­ cells such as fibroblasts is a contributing hybrids cells can divide indefinitely. This thesis suggests that somatic cells are factor in the process of ageing3 • surprising result is interpreted as support switched to a repair level which is optimally If both these ideas are true, then cancer for the hypothesis of programmed cessa­ efficient from the organism's point of view and ageing are intimately connected at the tion of cell division, the argument being even if less than optimal for the cell. If this cellular level, and if we could but under­ that immortality can arise from various is the case, transformation of a cell to im­ stand the mechanism by which one process distinct dysfunctions in the programme mortality can be understood as a product occurs, we should be better placed to under­ and that, among hybrids between cell lines of clonal selection acting on rare mutations stand the other. Behind the simple dichot­ immortalized in different ways, com­ or epigenetic changes which enhance the omy between finite and infinite cell popul­ plementation can restore the operation of capacity of a cell to cope with damage, ation growth, however, lie complex issues. the programme for mortality. I will, either by repairing it more effectively or by First, there are two quite different types however, explain that this finding does not diluting it with more rapid cell division. It is of theories to explain why cells stop pro­ militate against the alternative hypothesis possible that such a change might be liferating. One postulates a rigourously of random damage as strongly as Pereira­ 'recessive' and, therefore, consistent with programmed series of events specifically Smith and Smith have claimed; in any case, the data of Pereira-Smith and Smith6 • aimed at terminating cell division; the for a trait as complex as immortality, the The advances made in recent months in other, that cells cease growing because they classical concepts of dominance and understanding cell immortalization suggest accumulate random defects, particularly recessiveness may be too narrow. that a new path to unravelling the among macromolecules. The two mechan­ The second study, by Huschtscha and mechanisms of carcinogenesis and cell age­ isms call for quite different explanations of HollidaylO, details the events surrounding ing may have been opened up. In working how cells can escape the ageing process and transformation by SV40 of the human our way down this path, it will be helpful to become immortalized4, although testing diploid cell strain MRC-5, comparing two keep the competing hypotheses of both for this difference is by no means easy. permanent cell lines obtained therefrom. these fields firmly in mind. Looking back Second, while the growth behaviour of a The lines differ in several respects, in­ nearly a hundred years, it is amusing to population of cells is necessarily deter­ cluding morphology, modal chromosome note the sharp prejudice of Vinesl4 , who mined by the replicative properties of the number, glucose requirement and, in par­ wrote of Weismann's theory of cell ageing individual cells within it, the relationship is ticular, stability of the immortal that it is "absurd to say that an immortal not always obvious. If immortal cells give phenotype. substance can be converted into a mortal rise to mortal cells which undergo only a One of the lines (called MRC-5Vl) is substance". Poor Professor Vines has been finite number of divisions before they die, a unusually unstable in that the growth of proved wrong, The conversion appears to culture consisting initially of immortal cells some sub-lines slows over a period of many work both ways, and with any luck we may may nevertheless have only a finite life­ population doublings, the cultures dying soon know why. 0 span5 • This surprising outcome arises out in a manner closely resembling the because the immortal cells are 'diluted' by behaviour of normal cells. By recovering their mortal progeny and, in appropriate cells frozen in liquid nitrogen, the line was T.B.L. Kirkwood is at the National Institute for Medical Research, Mill Hill, London NW7 1.44. circumstances, may become so scarce that kept growing through 750 population they are lost altogether. doublings, raising the question whether the Two recent studies, both by groups with immortal phenotype is carried only by a I. Cairns. J. & I.ogan. J . NalurtYJ4, 582 (1983). long-standing interests in the problems of small sub-population of cells which may on 2. Land. H .. Parada. I..F. & Weinberg, R.A. Science 222, 77 1 (1983). cellular ageing, suggest that the trans­ occasion have been lost. Regrettably, 3. Haynick. I .. Scienr. 4m. 242, 42 (1980). formation of normal cells to immortality Huschtscha and Holliday were unable to 4. Kirk wood. T.B.L.& Crem<r. T. Hum. Gen€!. 60, 101 \ 1982). 5. Kirkwood. T.B.!.. & Holliday, R. J. lheor. Bioi. 53.481 (1 975). may not be as irreversible as is generally test this hypothesis directly by growing in­ 6. Pereira-Smith . O.M. & Smith. J . R. Science 221. 964 (1983). thought, and throw light on some of the dividual clones of MRC-5Vl cells, but in­ 7. Bun n. C. I.. & Tarrant. G. M. ExpICellRes. 127. 385 (198O). difficulties in interpreting the phenomenon dependent studies with HeLa and other cell 8. Muggicton·Harris, A.1.. & De Simone, D.W. Somal. Cell Genel. 6. 689 (1980). of immortalization. lines show that immortal cell populations, 9. Pereira·Smith. O,M. & Smith, l.R. Somal. Cell Genet. 7. Pereira-Smith and Smith6 used fusions even after many generations of selection in 4 11 ( 1981) . 10. Huschtsc ha. L. T. & Holliday. R. J. Cell Sci. 63, 77 (1983). between different combinations of mortal vitro, may contain a sizeable fraction (up to II. Ma rt inez. A.O " , 01. In VilrQ 14, 996 (1978). and immortal somatic cells to see whether 40 per cent) of cells whose potential for 12. Medawar, P.B. in The Uniqueness of the Individual 2nd cdn. 28 (Dover . New York. 1981). cellular immortality is dominant or division is Iimited6, II. If a similar, or even \3 . Kirkwood. T .B.!.. Nalure 270,301 (1977). recessive. When normal cells were more extreme, situation should pertain in 14. Vines . S. H. Nalurt 44l , 62 1 (1889). © 1984 Nature Publishing Group.
Recommended publications
  • Eternity and Immortality in Spinoza's Ethics

    Eternity and Immortality in Spinoza's Ethics

    Midwest Studies in Philosophy, XXVI (2002) Eternity and Immortality in Spinoza’s Ethics STEVEN NADLER I Descartes famously prided himself on the felicitous consequences of his philoso- phy for religion. In particular, he believed that by so separating the mind from the corruptible body, his radical substance dualism offered the best possible defense of and explanation for the immortality of the soul. “Our natural knowledge tells us that the mind is distinct from the body, and that it is a substance...And this entitles us to conclude that the mind, insofar as it can be known by natural phi- losophy, is immortal.”1 Though he cannot with certainty rule out the possibility that God has miraculously endowed the soul with “such a nature that its duration will come to an end simultaneously with the end of the body,” nonetheless, because the soul (unlike the human body, which is merely a collection of material parts) is a substance in its own right, and is not subject to the kind of decomposition to which the body is subject, it is by its nature immortal. When the body dies, the soul—which was only temporarily united with it—is to enjoy a separate existence. By contrast, Spinoza’s views on the immortality of the soul—like his views on many issues—are, at least in the eyes of most readers, notoriously difficult to fathom. One prominent scholar, in what seems to be a cry of frustration after having wrestled with the relevant propositions in Part Five of Ethics,claims that this part of the work is an “unmitigated and seemingly unmotivated disaster..
  • Therapeutic Targeting of Replicative Immortality

    Therapeutic Targeting of Replicative Immortality

    Seminars in Cancer Biology 35 (2015) S104–S128 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Seminars in Cancer Biology jo urnal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/semcancer Review Therapeutic targeting of replicative immortality a,∗ b c d e Paul Yaswen , Karen L. MacKenzie , W. Nicol Keith , Patricia Hentosh , Francis Rodier , f g h i c Jiyue Zhu , Gary L. Firestone , Ander Matheu , Amancio Carnero , Alan Bilsland , j k,1 k,1 l,1 Tabetha Sundin , Kanya Honoki , Hiromasa Fujii , Alexandros G. Georgakilas , m,1 n,o,1 p,1 q,1 Amedeo Amedei , Amr Amin , Bill Helferich , Chandra S. Boosani , r,1 s,1 t,1 u,1 Gunjan Guha , Maria Rosa Ciriolo , Sophie Chen , Sulma I. Mohammed , v,1 r,1 w,1 m,1 Asfar S. Azmi , Dipita Bhakta , Dorota Halicka , Elena Niccolai , s,1 n,o,1 x,1 p,1 Katia Aquilano , S. Salman Ashraf , Somaira Nowsheen , Xujuan Yang a Life Sciences Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Lab, Berkeley, CA, United States b Children’s Cancer Institute Australia, Kensington, New South Wales, Australia c University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom d Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA, United States e Universit´e de Montr´eal, Montr´eal, QC, Canada f Washington State University College of Pharmacy, Pullman, WA, United States g University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, United States h Biodonostia Institute, Gipuzkoa, Spain i Instituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla, HUVR, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientificas, Universdad de Sevilla, Seville, Spain j Sentara Healthcare, Norfolk, VA, United States k Nara Medical University, Kashihara,
  • Classification of Cell Death

    Classification of Cell Death

    Cell Death and Differentiation (2005) 12, 1463–1467 & 2005 Nature Publishing Group All rights reserved 1350-9047/05 $30.00 www.nature.com/cdd News and Commentary Classification of cell death: recommendations of the Nomenclature Committee on Cell Death G Kroemer*,1, WS El-Deiry2, P Golstein3, ME Peter4, D Vaux5, with or without, caspase activation and that ‘autophagic cell P Vandenabeele6, B Zhivotovsky7, MV Blagosklonny8, death’ represents a type of cell death with (but not necessarily W Malorni9, RA Knight10, M Piacentini11, S Nagata12 and through) autophagic vacuolization. This article details the G Melino10,13 2005 recommendations of NCCD. Over time, molecular definitions are expected to emerge for those forms of cell 1 CNRS-UMR8125, Institut Gustave Roussy, 39 rue Camille-Desmoulins, death that remain descriptive. F-94805 Villejuif, France 2 University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA Preface 3 Centre d’Immunologie INSERM/CNRS/Universite de la Mediterranee de Marseille-Luminy, Case 906, Avenue de Luminy, 13288 Marseille Cedex 9, It is obvious that clear definitions of objects that are only France shadows in Plato’s cage are difficult to be achieved. Cell death 4 The Ben May Institute for Cancer Research, University of Chicago, 924 E 57th and the different subroutines leading to cell death do not Street, Chicago, IL 60637, USA 5 escape this rule. Even worse, the notion of death is strongly Sir William Dunn School of Pathology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3RE, influenced by religious and cultural beliefs, which may UK 6 Molecular Signalling and Cell Death Unit, Department for Molecular Biomedical subliminally influence the scientific view of cell death.
  • Immortality of the Soul (Plat Ōn) and Bodily Resurrection (Paul) — Any Rapprochement?

    Immortality of the Soul (Plat Ōn) and Bodily Resurrection (Paul) — Any Rapprochement?

    IMMORTALITY OF THE SOUL (PLAT ŌN) AND BODILY RESURRECTION (PAUL) — ANY RAPPROCHEMENT? ChrYs C. Caragounis [email protected] ABSTRACT It is a usual assumption among NeW Testament scholars that in his discussion of the resurrec - tion of the dead, Paul holds to the JeWish VieW of the resurrection of the bodY, not to the Hellenic (Platonic) VieW of the immortalitY of the soul. As this question impinges on the question of anthropologY, it is further stated that according to the Hellenic VieW man has a bodY — Which, moreoVer is conceiVed as a tomb of the soul (Orphics) — Whereas accor - ding to the JeWish VieW man is a bodY. A careful inVestigation of the Hellenic and OT-JeWish eVidence shoWs that it is a metho - dological miss to confuse VieWs in Hom ēros and the Orphics With later VieWs in Sokrates and Plat ōn. MoreoVer there neVer Was a “JeWish VieW” of the resurrection. There Were fiVe/siX VieWs. The resurrection of the bodY Was a minoritY VieW. The Pauline teXts shoW that Paul speaks of the resurrection of the dead but neVer of the resurrection of the bodY as Well as that man has a bodY. It is thus intriguing to compare Paul’s VieW of resurrection With Plat ōn’s VieW of the immortalitY of the soul and see hoW far apart theY are from one another. KEY WORDS : First Corinthians, Resurrection (of the bodY), ImmortalitY of the soul. 3 2 1 5 - 1. INTRODUCTION 3 2 . P P , Ernest Best prefaces his discussion of 1 Th 5:23 in his commentarY With 6 1 0 the remark that “To the Greek for Whom the bodY Was the tomb or prison of the 2 ; 1 7 immortal soul its ultimate fate Was unimportant” .
  • Genomic Profiling Reveals High Frequency of DNA Repair Genetic

    Genomic Profiling Reveals High Frequency of DNA Repair Genetic

    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Genomic profling reveals high frequency of DNA repair genetic aberrations in gallbladder cancer Reham Abdel‑Wahab1,9, Timothy A. Yap2, Russell Madison4, Shubham Pant1,2, Matthew Cooke4, Kai Wang4,5,7, Haitao Zhao8, Tanios Bekaii‑Saab6, Elif Karatas1, Lawrence N. Kwong3, Funda Meric‑Bernstam2, Mitesh Borad6 & Milind Javle1,10* DNA repair gene aberrations (GAs) occur in several cancers, may be prognostic and are actionable. We investigated the frequency of DNA repair GAs in gallbladder cancer (GBC), association with tumor mutational burden (TMB), microsatellite instability (MSI), programmed cell death protein 1 (PD‑1), and its ligand (PD‑L1) expression. Comprehensive genomic profling (CGP) of 760 GBC was performed. We investigated GAs in 19 DNA repair genes including direct DNA repair genes (ATM, ATR , BRCA1, BRCA2, FANCA, FANCD2, MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, PALB2, POLD1, POLE, PRKDC, and RAD50) and caretaker genes (BAP1, CDK12, MLL3, TP53, and BLM) and classifed patients into 3 groups based on TMB level: low (< 5.5 mutations/Mb), intermediate (5.5–19.5 mutations/Mb), and high (≥ 19.5 mutations/Mb). We assessed MSI status and PD‑1 & PD‑L1 expression. 658 (86.6%) had at least 1 actionable GA. Direct DNA repair gene GAs were identifed in 109 patients (14.2%), while 476 (62.6%) had GAs in caretaker genes. Both direct and caretaker DNA repair GAs were signifcantly associated with high TMB (P = 0.0005 and 0.0001, respectively). Tumor PD‑L1 expression was positive in 119 (15.6%), with 17 (2.2%) being moderate or high. DNA repair GAs are relatively frequent in GBC and associated with coexisting actionable mutations and a high TMB.
  • Mitosis Vs. Meiosis

    Mitosis Vs. Meiosis

    Mitosis vs. Meiosis In order for organisms to continue growing and/or replace cells that are dead or beyond repair, cells must replicate, or make identical copies of themselves. In order to do this and maintain the proper number of chromosomes, the cells of eukaryotes must undergo mitosis to divide up their DNA. The dividing of the DNA ensures that both the “old” cell (parent cell) and the “new” cells (daughter cells) have the same genetic makeup and both will be diploid, or containing the same number of chromosomes as the parent cell. For reproduction of an organism to occur, the original parent cell will undergo Meiosis to create 4 new daughter cells with a slightly different genetic makeup in order to ensure genetic diversity when fertilization occurs. The four daughter cells will be haploid, or containing half the number of chromosomes as the parent cell. The difference between the two processes is that mitosis occurs in non-reproductive cells, or somatic cells, and meiosis occurs in the cells that participate in sexual reproduction, or germ cells. The Somatic Cell Cycle (Mitosis) The somatic cell cycle consists of 3 phases: interphase, m phase, and cytokinesis. 1. Interphase: Interphase is considered the non-dividing phase of the cell cycle. It is not a part of the actual process of mitosis, but it readies the cell for mitosis. It is made up of 3 sub-phases: • G1 Phase: In G1, the cell is growing. In most organisms, the majority of the cell’s life span is spent in G1. • S Phase: In each human somatic cell, there are 23 pairs of chromosomes; one chromosome comes from the mother and one comes from the father.
  • The Makropulos Case: Reflections on the Tedium of Immortality

    The Makropulos Case: Reflections on the Tedium of Immortality

    The Makropulos case: reflections on the tedium of immortality Author: Bernard Williams Source: Problems of the Self, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1973. This essay started life as a lecture in a series ‘on the immortality of the soul or kindred spiritual subject’.1 My kindred spiritual subject is, one might say, the mortality of the soul. Those among previous lecturers who were philosophers tended, I think, to discuss the question whether we are immortal; that is not my subject, but rather what a good thing it is that we are not. Immortality, or a state without death, would be meaningless, I shall suggest; so, in a sense, death gives the meaning to life. That does not mean that we should not fear death (whatever force that injunction might be taken to have, anyway). Indeed, there are several very different ways in which it could be true at once that death gave the meaning to life and that death was, other things being equal, something to be feared. Some existentialists, for instance, seem to have said that death was what gave meaning to life, if anything did, just because it was the fear of death that gave meaning to life; I shall not follow them. I shall rather pursue the idea that from facts about human desire and happiness and what a human life is, it follows both that immortality would be, where conceivable at all, intolerable, and that (other things being equal) death is reasonably regarded as an evil. Considering whether death can reasonably be regarded as an evil is in fact as near as I shall get to considering whether it should be feared: they are not quite the same question.
  • Exploring the Interplay of Telomerase Reverse Transcriptase and Β-Catenin in Hepatocellular Carcinoma

    Exploring the Interplay of Telomerase Reverse Transcriptase and Β-Catenin in Hepatocellular Carcinoma

    cancers Review Exploring the Interplay of Telomerase Reverse Transcriptase and β-Catenin in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Srishti Kotiyal and Kimberley Jane Evason * Department of Oncological Sciences, Department of Pathology, and Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-801-587-4606 Simple Summary: Liver cancer is one of the deadliest human cancers. Two of the most common molecular aberrations in liver cancer are: (1) activating mutations in the gene encoding β-catenin (CTNNB1); and (2) promoter mutations in telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT). Here, we review recent findings regarding the interplay between TERT and β-catenin in order to better understand their role in liver cancer. Abstract: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the deadliest human cancers. Activating muta- tions in the telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT) promoter (TERTp) and CTNNB1 gene encoding β-catenin are widespread in HCC (~50% and ~30%, respectively). TERTp mutations are predicted to increase TERT transcription and telomerase activity. This review focuses on exploring the role of TERT and β-catenin in HCC and the current findings regarding their interplay. TERT can have contradictory effects on tumorigenesis via both its canonical and non-canonical functions. As a critical regulator of proliferation and differentiation in progenitor and stem cells, activated β-catenin drives HCC; however, inhibiting endogenous β-catenin can also have pro-tumor effects. Clinical studies revealed a significant concordance between TERTp and CTNNB1 mutations in HCC. In Citation: Kotiyal, S.; Evason, K.J. stem cells, TERT acts as a co-factor in β-catenin transcriptional complexes driving the expression Exploring the Interplay of Telomerase of WNT/β-catenin target genes, and β-catenin can bind to the TERTp to drive its transcription.
  • Telomere and Telomerase in Oncology

    Telomere and Telomerase in Oncology

    Cell Research (2002); 12(1):1-7 http://www.cell-research.com REVIEW Telomere and telomerase in oncology JIAO MU*, LI XIN WEI International Joint Cancer Institute, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China ABSTRACT Shortening of the telomeric DNA at the chromosome ends is presumed to limit the lifespan of human cells and elicit a signal for the onset of cellular senescence. To continually proliferate across the senescent checkpoint, cells must restore and preserve telomere length. This can be achieved by telomerase, which has the reverse transcriptase activity. Telomerase activity is negative in human normal somatic cells but can be detected in most tumor cells. The enzyme is proposed to be an essential factor in cell immortalization and cancer progression. In this review we discuss the structure and function of telomere and telomerase and their roles in cell immortalization and oncogenesis. Simultaneously the experimental studies of telomerase assays for cancer detection and diagnosis are reviewed. Finally, we discuss the potential use of inhibitors of telomerase in anti-cancer therapy. Key words: Telomere, telomerase, cancer, telomerase assay, inhibitor. Telomere and cell replicative senescence base pairs of the end of telomeric DNA with each Telomeres, which are located at the end of round of DNA replication. Hence, the continual chromosome, are crucial to protect chromosome cycles of cell growth and division bring on progress- against degeneration, rearrangment and end to end ing telomere shortening[4]. Now it is clear that te- fusion[1]. Human telomeres are tandemly repeated lomere shortening is responsible for inducing the units of the hexanucleotide TTAGGG. The estimated senescent phenotype that results from repeated cell length of telomeric DNA varies from 2 to 20 kilo division, but the mechanism how a short telomere base pairs, depending on factors such as tissue type induces the senescence is still unknown.
  • The Biochemistry of Cell Death Cell Death: Apoptosis and Other Means to an End, Second Edition by Douglas R

    The Biochemistry of Cell Death Cell Death: Apoptosis and Other Means to an End, Second Edition by Douglas R

    Zampieri et al. Cell Death and Disease (2020) 11:259 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41419-020-2465-5 Cell Death & Disease BOOK REVIEW Open Access The biochemistry of cell death Cell Death: Apoptosis and Other Means to an End, Second Edition by Douglas R. Green, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, New York, 2018 Carlotta Zampieri 1, Carlo Ganini 1 and Gerry Melino 1 Can we impress you with a mind-blowing revelation? Douglas Green is one of the worldwide leading experts “Cells are not eternal in our bodies, but rather they on apoptosis and cell death. He has dealt with the role of encounter death!”1. cell death in the regulation of cancer and immune If someone pronounces this sentence at a biology class, response, studying the molecular events that drive the students will laugh. Why? Because cell death has been process, focusing on the induction-activation of apoptosis studied since the 60s of the last century. When we speak in T cells and the role of Myc, death receptors and Bcl-2 about apoptosis nowadays, we regard it as a well-known in this context. His deep understanding of the field truth. Anyway, this truth did not catch the attention of allowed him to write the first edition of this book in a scientists until the 1980s, where the interest in the field clear and straightforward manner, enriched by extremely exploded, leading to a dramatic increase of publications. informative figures. His talent as a biologist, as well as a Cell death passed “from neglect to hysteria” in only a few communicator, has been condensed in this second edi- years, citing Martin Raff2, one of the founders of the field.
  • “Is Cryonics an Ethical Means of Life Extension?” Rebekah Cron University of Exeter 2014

    “Is Cryonics an Ethical Means of Life Extension?” Rebekah Cron University of Exeter 2014

    1 “Is Cryonics an Ethical Means of Life Extension?” Rebekah Cron University of Exeter 2014 2 “We all know we must die. But that, say the immortalists, is no longer true… Science has progressed so far that we are morally bound to seek solutions, just as we would be morally bound to prevent a real tsunami if we knew how” - Bryan Appleyard 1 “The moral argument for cryonics is that it's wrong to discontinue care of an unconscious person when they can still be rescued. This is why people who fall unconscious are taken to hospital by ambulance, why they will be maintained for weeks in intensive care if necessary, and why they will still be cared for even if they don't fully awaken after that. It is a moral imperative to care for unconscious people as long as there remains reasonable hope for recovery.” - ALCOR 2 “How many cryonicists does it take to screw in a light bulb? …None – they just sit in the dark and wait for the technology to improve” 3 - Sterling Blake 1 Appleyard 2008. Page 22-23 2 Alcor.org: ‘Frequently Asked Questions’ 2014 3 Blake 1996. Page 72 3 Introduction Biologists have known for some time that certain organisms can survive for sustained time periods in what is essentially a death"like state. The North American Wood Frog, for example, shuts down its entire body system in winter; its heart stops beating and its whole body is frozen, until summer returns; at which point it thaws and ‘comes back to life’ 4.
  • Dual Effects of Thyroid Hormone on Neurons and Neurogenesis

    Dual Effects of Thyroid Hormone on Neurons and Neurogenesis

    Lin et al. Cell Death and Disease (2020) 11:671 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41419-020-02836-9 Cell Death & Disease ARTICLE Open Access Dual effects of thyroid hormone on neurons and neurogenesis in traumatic brain injury Chao Lin1,2, Nan Li3, Hanxiao Chang1,2,Yuqishen1,2,ZhengLi1,2,Wuwei1,2,HuaChen1,2,HuaLu1,2,JingJi 1,2 and Ning Liu1,2 Abstract Thyroid hormone (TH) plays a crucial role in neurodevelopment, but its function and specific mechanisms remain unclear after traumatic brain injury (TBI). Here we found that treatment with triiodothyronine (T3) ameliorated the progression of neurological deficits in mice subjected to TBI. The data showed that T3 reduced neural death and promoted the elimination of damaged mitochondria via mitophagy. However, T3 did not prevent TBI-induced cell death in phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN)-induced putative kinase 1 (Pink1) knockout mice suggesting the involvement of mitophagy. Moreover, we also found that T3 promoted neurogenesis via crosstalk between mature neurons and neural stem cells (NSCs) after TBI. In neuron cultures undergoing oxygen and glucose deprivation (OGD), conditioned neuron culture medium collected after T3 treatment enhanced the in vitro differentiation of NSCs into mature neurons, a process in which mitophagy was required. Taken together, these data suggested that T3 treatment could provide a therapeutic approach for TBI by preventing neuronal death via mitophagy and promoting neurogenesis via neuron–NSC crosstalk. 1234567890():,; 1234567890():,; 1234567890():,; 1234567890():,; Introduction treatments focus only on preventing complications or Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is considered to be a providing support in nature. leading cause of substantial mortality and long-term dis- Thyroid hormone (TH) is crucial for neural stem cell ability among young adults worldwide1.