«...._- . -. ' - «- . -^-. » - - - d. ', f"i'
October 25, 2019
Ms. Mavis Ellis, Chairperson Howard County Board of Education 10910 Clarksville Pike Ellicott City, Maryland 21042
Re: HCPSS Attendance Area Alignment Plan
Dear Ms. Ellis,
Wewrite to expressthe Coalition'ssupport of Dr. Martirano'sand the School Board'sefforts to better balance school capacity and demographics so that all schools have FARMs populations closer to the County average. We recognize that this is a tough task, but believe it an important task. We support the many public comments referencing the strong body of research affirming that all students perform better when engaged in education that is delivered in a diverse environment.
Coalition members are disappointed that the proposed plan will not open any new areasfor development under the newAPFO law. We do expect, however, that at some point these readjustments will result in areas within the community opening up thereby increasing opportunities to generate housing options for HCPSS low and moderate income families.
We are sincerely appreciative of the Board of Education's commitment to meeting the challenges of attendancearea alignment. Asyou continueyour deliberations of the proposed plan andthe public comments it haselicited, we are confident that your final decisionswill result in better school opportunities for all children, including our County's students who are homeless, housing insecure and living in existingaffordable housing.
Respectfully,
J'OLC^tieluaa'En^- Jacqueline Eng, Coordinator Housing Affordability Coalition
Cc: Members, Howard County Board of Education Dr. Michael Martirano, HCPSSSuperintendent
The Howard County Affordable Housing Coalition Committed to achievingcommunity understanding, pollcymaking andregulatory decisions that will leadto an increasein and equitable access to HowardCounty housingaffordobility; and Creating a comniunlty-wide recognition that Howard County's economic vitality Isdependent upon access to jobs, resident mobility, quality education and housing affordobility. Kathleen V. Hanks
From: claudia hollywood
Howard County School Board
I live in OaklandMills andhave for over 40 years. Although I nolonger have children in the school system, ! do have grandchildren who are. I amvery concerned with what is going on with the redistricting process thus far. I have listened and read all the negativity and feel I can no longer be silent. I amnot surewhy the highschool level is being so impacted atthis time, asthere will be anotherschool openingin a couple ofyears whichwill causea reshuffling ofstudents again.The school system obviously miscalculated thenumber ofstudents in westernHoward County whenbuilding schools ifthey are so under utilized. While, in my opinion, the county continued to build rapidly on the eastside with no Aought to where these children would attend school. Sadly, It seems that no one seemed to notice thedisparity, with schools in the west becoming more white while Columbia and the east had a disproportionate number ofminority and poorer students attending schools. I have a couple of suggestions. First let all the students who were districted to Riverhill, be sent back to or to Glenelg, Marriott Ridge, or Mt Hebron. Thenuse the open seats atRiverhill housethe students to be districted to the newEastern HS until their school is open. Thatwould be anincentive to getit built, soonerthan later. It would relieve some overcrowding at Howard in the process. Since Oakland Mills is undemtilized, keep the areas attending andhave Glenmont return to OMHS. That areahas been sent to OM in the past. Giving the school some middle income families in the process. As far asTalbott Springs and Stevens Forest, the children living inVerona right nextto the school and Basket Ringshould be attending Talbott Springs,not be walking past it to getto StevensForest. Thathas always been a travesty that needs to be corrected The other Verona still should go to Stevens Forest. I am not sure why polygons are setup asthey arewith absolutely no flexibility at all. As far asHopewell and Sewells Orchard communities, oneneeds to go to Talbott Springs, andthe otherto StevensForest. Peopleneed to become investedin whatever school their children attend. Ifthat doesn't work, make StevensForest pre K -2ndgrade andTalbott Springs 3-5. Thatway all the parents will bevested in both schools. This hasworked elsewhere. Petitionthe county to endfee in lieu. Thishas created this inequity, in neighborhoods andtherefore schools. Manyof us bought our homes, based on where our children would go to school. Weexpected change, but not so drastically thatcertain communities andtheir schools would have to shoulderthis much disparity Mid inequity. Oakland Mills is a strong community, but evenwe cannot do it all. It is pasttime to correct this situation, without all this animosity. Thankyou Claudia Hollywood [email protected]
Sent from my iPad October 25, 2019
Board of Education Howard County Public School System 10910ClarksvillePike EllicottCity, MD21042 redistricting(%hcDss.ors
Dear Members of the Board: Thankyou for the opportunity to comment onthe Superintendent's Proposed Attendance AreaAdjustment Planfor SY 2020-2021 (hereinafter referred to asthe "Proposed Plan"), . . r?olyg??is 178and one ofour two childrenwill bedirectly affectedby the Proposed Plan. Aslifelong Howard County residents, we value all of the resources that were expended to propose a planof this magnitude. Wesupport addressing over-capacity atschools andensuring thatall Howard County studentsreceive the means necessary to obtaina quality education. However, asdescribed more folly below, we areunable to support the Proposed Planbecause we believe it violates basicdue process rights, is inconsistent withPolicy 6010, and is not m thebest interestof most students. Accordingly,we respectfully urge you to vote "no" to the Proposed Plan. The Proposed Planhas received a lot ofattention through hundreds ofwritten andverbal testimonies,at-capacity hearings, several protests, and local and national news interest. Manyin thecounty - acrossthe entire county, not just in any one community - havespoken out in opposition ofthe Proposed Plan. And,unfortunately, somepeople havemade ignorant and uncivil comments. Thesetypes ofcomments areuneducated andshould not be tolerated. The public, theSuperintendent, themembers ofthe area adjustment committee ("AAC"), andthe members ofthe Boardshould be careful not to taintthese discussionswith conscious or unconscious biases, pre-judgements, orprejudices. Ourfocus should beon the county's children - for their overall well-being andeducation - andon their families. VIOLATIONS OF DUE PROCESS Dueprocess isthe fundamental rightto beheard; in its very basicform it requires being madeaware of pending matters that may threaten the denial of life, liberty, orproperty, having" timeto becomeinformed ofsuch matters, andhaving an opportunity to communicate'apositio'n tothe appropriate decision-makingauthority. ' Importantly, dueprocess ensures fairness and justice. TheProposed Planviolates dueprocess rights. SectionII ofPolicy 6010 (ImplementationProcedures) outlines in detail the process for providing notice to and gathering inputfrom the public before the Superintendent proposes anattendance areaadjustment planto the Board. Inthis instance, thepublic was afforded anopportunity to review andcomment on the2019 Feasibility Stady^ The2019 Study included several options forhandling th7capacity issue andreceived public feedbackon those options. As a practical matter, it is not unusual for a planto be change based on caiefal consideration of public feedback. However, the AAC devised
SeeTrinity Episcopal School Corp. v. Romney, 387 F. Supp. 1044, 1084(S. D.N. Y 1974). andthe Superintendent proposed a plan (the Proposed Plan) to the Boardthat didnot flow naturally from the2019 Feasibility Study or the subsequent public feedback that wasreceived.2 Infact, the plan that has been proposed to the Board is radically different in many significant waysand expanded the scope of the exercise without giving the public the opportunity to review andcomment onthe expanded scope and new options beforebeing proposed to theBoard. There is anillogical disconnect between broadcasting a rigorous process forpublic review and comment whenmitially introducing options forpotential attendance areaadjustments andthen notseek public review and comment onnew options that had not been previously previewedby thepublic or was not otherwise derived from initial public comment. TheSuperintendent should havepublished anamended Feasibility Studyfor public review and comment onthe expanded scopeand new redistricting options before proposing the plan to the Board. Becausethat process wasnot followed, the Superintendent violated vital dueprocess requirements. INCONSISTENCIESWITH POLICY 6010 a'OLYGON 1781 TheProposed Plan is inconsistent withPolicy 6010. Specifically, Policy6010(School AttendanceAreas), SectionIV(B)(2)(c) supports community stabilitythrough the consideration ofthe "frequency withwhich any one student is reassigned, making every attempt to not move a student morethan once at any school level orthe same student more frequently thanonce every fiveyears. " Polygon 178(and Polygon 1178)was redistricted to WestFriendship Elementary' School lastyear(2018)to address capacity issues atManor Woods Elementary School. Under theProposed Plan,Polygon 178(and Polygons 1178, 179,and 1179)would be redistricted again, this time &om WestFriendship Elementary to Triadelphia RidgeElementary School. This shift would affect approxunately 63 children. Inconsistent with Policy 6010's statement "to make every attempt to notmove a studentmore thanonce. .. ", these childrenare being moved for a second time. ^ Additionally,Policy 6010, Section IV(B)(2)(a) furthersupports community stability throughthe consideration of "feeds that encourage keeping students together from, one school to thenext Forexample, avoidingfeeds of less than 15%at the receiving school. " Polygon 178 (and Polygon 1178) feeds into Mount ViewMiddle School. According to page 19of the ProposedPlan, only 10. 5%of students attending Triadelphia Ridge Elementary School will feed into Mount ViewMiddle School. TheProposed Planis inconsistent withPolicy 6010's statement to avoid redistricting to schools with feeds ofless than 15%. Further, and not ofinconsequence, it is absolutely unnecessary to move these 63 children (again). West Friendship Elementary School is under capacity. This shift ofsmdents does not resolveany meaningful concerns and only burdens the children once again. Thisis just one example ofmany where the redistricting set forth in the Proposed Plan'is inconsistent with the intentofPolicy 6010 Ifthe Board approves theProposed Planto movePolygou 178(and 1178) to TriadelphiaRidge Elementary School,the Board would be signaling a blatantdisregard for capacity stability asoutlined in Policy 6010and setting precedent that'the Policy is
Consider, for instance^the fact that the results from Question5 ofthe Boundary ReviewFeedback; indicatedthat the top 3 prioritiesfor the Howard County citizens in considering attendance area" adjustments was0)_keeping feedstogether (65. 95%), (2) maintammg contigums~communities~or neighborhoods (59. 59%), and(3) frmsportation considerations (42. 64%). TheProposed pi'an"in'its expanded scope, disregards these results. r---. -, nonfimctional, inconsequential, andunenforceable. Pleaseconsider these 63 kids andbe a voice of reason for them.
SHUFFLINGFARM SCORESIS^DISINGENUOUS Dr. Martirano shouldbe commended for all ofhis extraordinaiy efforts to promote civility through hismotto of"work hard andbe kind. " However, theProposed Plandoes not addresscapacity issues in an appropriate manner nor does it achieveequity within the county. Thisplan reeks ofa numbers gameused to give anillusion oflower Free andReduced Meal program ("FARM") scores. The Proposed Plan appears to redistribute students across schools throughout the county with a blatant disregard for the overall well-being ofchildren, families, staff, transportation considerations (buses, cars, walkers), traffic concerns, before and after school obligations (religious, familial, or otherwise), andextracurricular activities. Further, the Proposed Plan appears to maliciously neglects the actual needs of the children who are the most vulnerable. Based on our research, the only conclusion that we can reach is that it appears that the top priority ofthe Proposed Plan is to redistribute students in anyway necessary to level FARM scores across the schools. FARM score shuffling solves no problems. Do not be fooled: this is not "equity. " Thecounty's children aredepending on you to getthis right. And, more specifically, so are the kids at the schools where the FARM scores are the highest. Generally speaking, many ofthe kids in schools with the highest FARM scores come to school without having hadtheir basicneeds met. They might be hungry, in need ofsleep, clothes that fit, or they might even be homeless. And because ofthe burden they carry on their young shoulders, they might be arriving to school angry, tired, sad, depressed, or anxious. Many ofthese kids' families are not focused on the importance ofeducation because they are trying to survive. The circumstances oftheir home life set them up for failure before they even step foot into the classroom, let alone sit fora standardized test. Gerrymandering FARM scores byredistricting FARM students to schools farther awayfrom theirhomes (particularly in areasof the county where there arethe greatest number ofhouseholds without cars) or by bringing non-FARM students into their schools will not miraculously improve learning ability andmake these students suddenlyperform better on standardizedtests. Thesekids needto be nurtured andcared for before theirminds canbe open for optimum learning. Meetingtheir basic needs first - emotionally andphysically - is howthese students' perfomiance will progress, howtest scores in highFARM score schools will eventually improve, andthat's howthese kids will succeed. And that would be an equitable result. The question ofhow to improve test scores in schoolswith high FARM scores is a problem thatexists across the state ofMaryland - notjust in Howard County. TheMaryland Commissionon Innovation and Excellence in Education ("Kirwan Conunission") is a multi-year initiative to research anddevelop major funding andpolicy reforms to improve the quality of Maryland's public education system. As described in the Kirwan Commission's 2019 Interim Report, equity in student outcomes is a critical component permeating throughout all ofthe Commission's recommendations. 3 TheCommission recognizesthat the State's low-performing schools, manywith the highest concentrations ofstudents living inpoverty, arebeing left behind
SeeMaryland Commission onInnovation & Excellence inEducation, Interim Repon (Jan.2019), p. 106. by our current system and that not taking meaningful action to address this issue will be a detrimentto the students, as well as to the State's future economic and political well-being. The Kirwan Commission acknowledges that it will require extra resources and a detennined. persistent, and comprehensive effort on behalf ofthese students to improve the current state of affairs. The Kirwan Commission, in proposing a new educational system, further recogni: that: .. .it is clear that students who come to formal schooling who might be homeless, who need and cannot get basic physical and mental health care. wholive in a neighborhood or in a family surroundedby poverty and constant violence, whose English is poor, whose vocabulary is so small that they have difficulty understanding what is going on in the classroom, or who have a disability, will need access to resoiirces other students do not need [emphasis added] to get the full benefits ofthe new system.4 Accordingly, inrecommending "anew system that will work to greatly improve the achievement ofthose who up to nowhave achievedthe least, "5 one ofthe fivepolicy recommendations made by the Commission in its 2019 Interim Report is to provide more resources to ensure that all students are successful. Wecan do better- muchbetter - thanthe plan asproposed. Leveling FARM scores across the county to correct overdevelopment and zoning issues is careless. For all ofthe foregoing reasons, we urge you to vote "no" to this Proposed Plan. With kind regards, Shauna Sappington Vlosich Jason Vlosich ec: Calvin Ball, Howard County Executive David Yungmann, Howard County Council, District 5
Id. at 107. Id. Kathleen V. Hanks
From: Mark Blair
According to Martirano (slide 9 ofhis presentation on 8/20/2019), limiting student travel times and maintaining walkable distances arethe top priorities for nearly 3000 residents who attended community sessions or online surveys. Building onthis public consensus, I request thatthe board discuss andpass the following proposals: 1. The immediate neighborhood(e. g., within2-3 miles) ofa school shouldnot beredistricted to other schools. Sending students from such neighborhoods to other schools is the least effective way to achieve other objectives of the redistricting process.
2. Except for areaswest ofthe Glenelg HS where there is no other school to choose from, setupper limits to the travel time/distance for all students. The specific limits need to be determined based on the real data, but I think it's reasonable to ask that most student should spend less than 1. 5 hours on school buses each day, and under no circumstances that number should be more than 2 hours for any student.
Thank you.
Mark Blair, Fulton. Kathleen V. Hanks
From: Allan Blackman
Dear Board Members,
As a Howard County citizen, I am surprised to learn that the data used to develop both redistricting plans (Martirano and feasibility study) are out of date, and am glad that some of you (Ms. Delmont-Small, Cutroneo, and Dr. Wu) are pushing very hard to get most recent data for this redistricting process. You are absolute rightthat a sound plan must be based on accurate model projections calibrated using current data, not out of date data.
As always, thank you for your service.
Allan Blackman, Mapple Lawn Dear Board Members,
Thankyou for serving on the Board of Education (BOE). am grateful that each ofyou are dedicated to theBoard's;'',. i-;. . ;;.^ ..,.... ;'. '- : -.. . ;li..- . . ...,....,. -. ^^ .;:... ;.. Asyou work on the redistricting plan in the comingweeks, please keepthis mission in your mind all the time. It is the only mission that should be used to guideyour decision making on any education policies, including the redistricting plan you are working on.
As a college professor teaching undergraduate and graduate courses, I know many factors can hurt a student's learning outcome. Lackof time is one of the most important factors. Time isa limited and irreplaceable resourcefor our students andtheir parents. Ifour students hadto wastehours each week due to your policies, nothing else you do could compensate for their losses from the wasted time, and their learning outcome would definitely go down. That is why citizens across the county have identified limiting student travel times and maintaining walkable distances astheir highest priorities regarding the redistricting process (See Figure 1 below).
Basedon this community consensus, I strongly request that you passa motion to exempt students living within 2-3 miles of a school from being moved out of that school. For such short distances, the driving times and bus rides are typically 10-15 minutes or less. Moving these students out of their closest schools will cause their travel times to increase by multiple times, and therefore will have disproportionately high negative impact on the affected students, FARMor non-FARM. Moving FARM students out of their neighborhood schools will be especially harmful to those students, because the increased travel burdens may be unsurmountable to them, making it substantially more difficult for them to accessschool resources. Suchdisproportionately high negative impact accountsfor a large portion and the most egregious part ofthe negative impact ofthe redistricting plan proposed by the superintendent. Exemptingthe students living in immediate neighborhoodsof a school from being moved will greatly reduce the negative impactof any redistricting plan aimed at balancingschool capacity.
Thank you for your continuous efforts in advancing BOE's mission. Chengquan Huang, Polygon # 176
, ': :i';.: . i-:1;,'^-! !.'T-' , _^-: ^..-
* Limit student travel times, walkable « Urnft student travel times, tnaintain distances watkabte distances » Bojtidary continuity «. Ba-indary continuity
<. SociO-economjc impact
Figure 1. CISzensacrws the county wantto limit student travel tim&sand malntafn walkable From: Jeff Scherock 22 October 2019 HCPSS Comprehensive Redistricting Plan (2020-21 and 2023-24 School Years) 22 October 2019 HCPSS Comprehensive Redistricting Plan (2020-21 and 2023-24 School Years) J.J. Scherock This page intentionally left blank 22 October 2019 HCPSS Comprehensive Redlstrlctlng Plan (2020-21 ana 2023-24 School Years) RELEASEHISTORY Authors Revision Description Date J. J. Scherock Initial release. 22 October 2019 22 October 2019 ill Table of Contents Listof Figures...... v List of Tables...... vii 1. Executive Summary...... 1 2. Background and Methodology...... 1 3. Plan Definition and Metrics ...... 1 3. 1 High School Boundary Assessment...... 8 3.2 Middle School Boundary Assessment...... 10 3.3 Elementary School Boundary Assessment...... 12 IV 22 October 2019 HCPSS Comprehensive Redlstnctlng Plan (2020-21 and 2023-24 School Years) List of Figures Figure 1: Current HS Boundaries ...... 9 Figure 2: Proposed HS Boundaries for 2020-2021 School Year...... 9 Figure 3: Proposed HS Boundaries for 2023-2024 School Year...... 9 Figure 4: Current MS Boundaries...... 11 Figure 5: ProposedMS Boundariesfor 2020-2021 School Year ...... 11 Figure 6: Proposed MS Boundaries for 2023-2024 School Year ...... 11 Figure 7: Current ES Boundaries...... 13 Figure 8: Proposed ES Boundaries for 2020-2021 School Year ...... 13 Figure 9: Proposed ES Boundaries for 2023-2024 School Year ...... 13 22 October 2019 This page intentionally left blank VI 22 October 2019 HCPSS Comprehensive Redlstricting Plan (2020-21 and 2023-24 School Years) List of Tables Table 1: HS Utilization for Current and Proposed Plans...... 2 Table 2: MS Utilization for Current andProposed Plans ...... 2 Table 3 :ES Utilization for Current and Proposed Plans ...... 3 Table 4: MS-HSFeed Report for Current and ProposedPlans ...... 4 Table 5: ES-MSFeed Report for Current and ProposedPlans...... 6 22 October 2019 vii This page intentionally left blank. viii 22 October 2019 HCPSS Comprehensive Redistricting Plan (2020-21 and 2023-24 School Years) 1. Executive Summary Comprehensive redistricting plans for the 2020-21 and 2U23-24 school years are submitted to the OfSce of School Planning (OSP) and Board of Education (BOE) pursuant to the Community Input provision of Policy 6010. The plans were developed using the 2019-2020 polygon projection data posted at httos://www. hcnss. ore/f/schoolDlaniunB/2019/data-enroll-Droiections- sucoressed. xlsx and Free and Reduced-Price Meal (FARM) Program participation data posted at htti)s://www. hct)ss. ore/f7schoolDlannme/2019/data-farm-test-suDt)ressed. xlsx. Because data was redacted for polygons containing fewer than 10 students per school level, the results will likely differ from those generated by the OSP. For this reason, as well as to provide detailed metrics not available in sufficient fidelity for computation by the author (e. g., English for Speakers of OtherLanguages (ESOL), etc.), an evaluation of the plan by the OSPis requested. 2. Background and Methodology Previous redistricting plans were submitted by the author in the tall ot 2U17 and 2018. The first such plan. Comprehensive Redistricting Plan for Howard County Public School System, submitted on 28 September 2017, described the process which considered proximity (including driving time/distance), utilization, and feeds in development of school attendance area recommendations. A follow-on evaluation, which considered limited HS redistricting, was submitted as HowardCounty Public School System Redistricting Testimony on 12 October 2017. Finally, Howard County Public School System Comprehensive Redistricting Plan (2023-24 School Year) was submitted on 15 November 2018. The plans described herein, though based on the same principles described in previous submissions and enumerated in Policy 6010, differ from those referenced in that they attempt to balance FARM ratios, to the extent practical, and provide recommendations for redistricting to be implemented for the 2020-2021 and 2023-2024 school years. The plan for the latter school year is necessitated by the anticipated opening of HS#13 at Mission Road in 2023. In recognition of this plaimed follow-on redistricting action, no polygons moved for the 2020-2021 school year are moved in 2023-2024. 3. Plan Definition and Metrics Utilization and FARM data for the 2020-2021 and 2023-2024 school years, as applicable, are provided for the current attendance areas and proposed plans as Table 1 for HS, Table 2 for MS, and Table 3 for ES. Each table entry i^ color-coded hire for utilization < 90%, ,-^^'' for utilization between 90% and 105%, yellow for utilization between 105% and 115%, and rci.1 for utilization over 115%. Also mcluded is the standard deviation of capacity utilization and FARM participation; a smaller number indicates a more balanced distribution across the schools. Feed report data for MS-HS and ES-MS are provided as Table 4 and Table 5. In these tables, small feeds are colored |^ed for levels below the threshold of 15%. The feed computations (and FARM participation) are basedon the 2018-2019 geographicattendance data, as usedby the OSP. 22 October 2019 Table I: HS Utilization for Current and Proposed Plans 2020-2021 HS FARM/ Utilization Projections 2023-2024 HS FARM/ Utilization Projections HS Name Capacity Current Proposed Current Proposed Ufll. FARM Utll. FARM Util. FARM Utll. FARM Atholton HS 1460 10.5% 113.5% 16.7% 10. 5% 22. 6% Centennial HS 1360 10.0% 10.8% 10. 0% 12.8% Qlenelg HS 1420 3.4% 3.3% 3.4% 3.3% Hammond HS I220/I420 38.9% 39.2% 38.9% 25. 8% Howard HS 1420 13.5% 17.7% 13.5% 26.2% Long Reach HS 1488 40.2% 37.4% 40.2% 31.2% Marriotts Ridge HS 1615 4.5% 6.2% 4.5% 6.2% Mission Road ff 13 HS 1658 34. 8% Mt Hcbran HS 1400 14.6% 15.3% 14.6% 14. 6% Oakland Mills HS 1400 47.3% 36.7% 47.3% 29. 2% Reservoir HS 1551 25.4% 26.9% 25.4% 25.2% River Hill HS 1488 1.4% 108.3% 5.0% 1.4% 5.0% Wilde LakeHS 1424 J. 42.7% 107.8% 37.8% 42.7% 40.2% Standard Deviation 14.7% 17. 0% 6.3% 13.9% 18.4% 17.0% 3.3% 11. 9% Includes addition of 200 seats following completion of renovation/addition for 2023-24 school year - minimal impact if deferred due to capacity at Reservoir HS, Mission Road #13 HS. andAtholtonHS Table 2: MS Utilization for Current and Proposed Plans 2020-2021 MS FARM/ Utilization Frojectlona 2023-2024 MS FARM/ Utiliation Projections MS Name Capacity Current Proposed Current Proposed v». FARM Udl. FARM Utll. FARM Utll. FARM Bonnie Branch MS 701 31. 1% 109.3% 32. 1% 31. 1% !06.0°. 32. 1% Burleigh Manor MS 779 ^- 10.7% 10.7% 10.7% i0^ 9.2% Clarksville MS 643 2. 1% 10.6% 2. 1% 10.6% Dunloggin MS 565" 18.5% 11.4% 18. 5% 107.3% 13. 0% Elkridge Landing MS 779 20.8% 27.4% 20.8% 106.6% 27.4% Ellicott Mills MS 701 9.6% 11.2% 9.6% 106. 0% 11.2% Folly Quarter MS 662 1.9% 2.4% 1. 9% I]".!!''. 2.4% GIenwood MS 545 7. 1% 6.4% 7. 1% 6.4% Hammond MS 604 19.2% 26. 1% 19. 2% 1;15 I'o 26. 1% Harpers Choice MS 506 49.5% 31. 5% 49. 5% 106.4% 31. 5',. Lake Elkhom MS 643 52. 5% 39.7',. 52. 5% 105.6% 39. 7% Lime Kite MS 721 1. 3% 16.7% 1. 3% Ill-5". 16. 7% Mayfield WoodsMS 798 42.8% 43.8% 42.8% ]ll'l(l"« 43.8% Mount View MS 798 3.9% 3. 5% 3.9% 3.4% Mun-ay Hill MS 662 38.5% 31.8% 38.5% 31.8% OaklaiidMills MS 506" 47. 5% 46.9% 47.5% 46.9% Pat^jsco MS 643 15. 4% 18.4% 15.4% 18.4% Patuxent Valley MS 760 36.7% 38.0% 36.7% 38.0% Thomas Viaduct MS 701 106.4% 45. 2% 35.2% 45.2% 35.2% WildeLake MS 721 46. 3% 40.4% 46.3% 38.8% Standard Deviation 11.0% 18.4% 6.4% 14.4% 14.3'/. 18.4% 3.0% I 14. 3% | 'Additional seats deferred until 2028 in BOB proposed budget Additional seats deferred until 2030 in BOE proposed budget https://www.hcpss. org/f/aboutus/fy202I-boai'd-proposed-capita. l-budget.pdf 22 October 2019 HCPSS Comprehensive Redlstrlctlng Plan (2020-21 and 2023-24 School Years) Table 3: ES Utilization for Current and Proposed Plans 2020-2021 ES FARM/ Utillzitlnn Projections 2023-M24 ES FARM/Utilization Projections ES Name Capacity Current Proposed Current Proposed Util. FARM Util. FARM Util. FARM Utll. FARM Atholton ES 424 ies.7". 14.4% 109.2% 30.2% 14.4% 1(17. 5'! 30. 2% Bellows SpringES 726 105.6% 17.2% 14.6% 17.2% 106. 1% 14. 6% Bollman BridgeES 666 49.8% 47.9% 49.8% 47. 9% Bryant Woods ES 361 50.8% 52.0% 50.8% 52.0% Bushy Park ES 725 3.0% 2.5% 3.0% 2. 5% Centennial Laiie ES 647 4.2% 4.2% 4.2% 3. 0% Clarksville ES 543 1.7% 16.0% 1.7% 16. 0% Clemens Crossing ES 521 13. 1% 26.7% 13. 1% 26. 7% Cradlerock ES 398 54.8% 42.9% 54.8% 42.9% Dayton Oaks ES 700 4. 1% 3.6% 4. 1% 3.6% Deep Run ES 750 54. 0% 48.9% 54. 0% 48.9% Ducketts Lane ES 650 53.4% 35.2% 53.4% 110.0% 35.2% ElkridgeES 760 31.8% 33.3% 31.8% 109.4% 33.3% ForestRidge ES 713 33.5% 37.5% 33.5% 110.7% 37.5% Fulton ES 826 4.0% 12.2% 4.0% 108.6% 12.2% GonnanCrossing ES 735 17.7% 21.4% 17.7% 21.4% Guilford ES 465 45. 1% 45.4% 45. 1% 45.4% Hammond ES 653 24.2% 17. 6% 24.2% 17.6% Hanover Hills ES 810 37. 2% 36.8% 37.2% 36.8% Hollifield Station ES 732 23. 4% 23.6% 23.4% 23.6% IlchcsterES 584 2. 5% 2.3% 2.5% 2.3% Jeffcrs Hill ES 421 35.4% 40.4% 35.4% 40.4% Laurel Woods ES 609 60.9% 45.7% 60.9% 45.7% Lisbon ES 527 11.8% 11. 2% 11.8% 11. 2% LongfellowES 512 48.8% 44. 8% 48. 8% 44. 8% Manor Woods ES 681 7. 1% 7.0% 7. 1% 7.0% Northfield ES 700 10. 1% 10. 1% 10. 1% 10.7% Phelps Luck ES 597 62.5% 44. 7% 62.5% 44.7% Pointers Run ES 744 2.7% 2. 5% 2.7% 2.5% Rockbum ES 584 5.5% li}7')°. 19.4% 5. 5% 19.4% Ruiining Brook ES 515 51.7% 108. 9% 37.3% 51.7% 37.3% St Johns Lane ES 612 8.5% 105.4% 2.3% 8. 5% 2.3% Stevens Forest ES 380 65.2% 111.6% 52.3% 65. 2% 52. 3% Swmsfield ES 694 60.0% 45.9% 60. 0% 45. 9% Talbott SpringsES 377/540* 49.0% 33.0% 49. 0% 28.4% Thunder Hill ES 509 21.3% 41.7% 21.3% 41.7% TriadelphiaRidge ES 606 2.6% 3.6% 2.6% 3.6% Veterans ES 799 20.0% 17. 7% 20.0% 17.7% Waterloo ES 603 23.8% 39.3% 6i i~ii 23.8% 39.3% Waverly ES 788 11; i% 0.7% 0.9% 113.8% 0.7% 0.9% West Friendship ES 414 5.3'/o 4.8% 114.5% 5.3% 4. 8% WurthingtonES 515 4.2% 105.(i% 20.7% is.yijl 4.2% 20. 7% Standard Deviation 13.6% 21. 5% 8. 1% 17.1% 16. 7% 21.5% 6.6% 17. 1% Renovation scheduled to complete in 2022 with 540 seats 22 October 2019 Table 4: MS-HS Feed Report for Current and Proposed Plans Current 2020-2021 2023-2024 Atholton HS Clarksville MS 34. 0% 16. 6% 18. 4% 16. 9% 26. 7% Hammond MS , 130% Lake Elkhorn MS 0. 0% 47. 9% 54. 9% Murray Hill MS 21. 1% 18. 7% 0. 0% Wilde Lake MS 31.9% 0.0% 0.0% Centennial HS Burleigh Manor MS 51. 1% 47. 9% 50. 4% Dunloggin MS 23. 6% 33. 5% 34. 5% Ellicott Mills MS 25. 3% 18. 6% 0. 0% Patapsco MS 0.0% 0.0% 15.2% Glenelg HS Folly Quarter MS 38. 5% 42. 1% 42. 1% Glenwood MS 61.5% 57.9% 57.9% Hammond HS Hammond MS 26. 6% 30. 9% 26. 0% Lake Elkhorn MS 11;9% 0. 0% 0. 0% Murray Hill MS 0. 0% 0. 0% 23. 5% Patuxent Valley MS 44. 8% 59. 6% 50. 4% Thomas Viaduct MS 16.7% 9. 5% 0.0% Howard HS Bonnie Branch MS 35. 2% 33. 1% 33. 6% Elkridge Landing MS 45. 7% 34. 8% 16. 1% Ellicott Mills MS 18. 7% 0. 0% 0. 0% Mayfield Woods MS 0.4% 20. 3% 27. 6% Thomas Viaduct MS 0.0% 11. 9% 22. 6% Long Reach HS Bonnie Branch MS 20. 5% 34. 8% Elkridge Landing MS 9. 0% 23. 3% 34. 2% Mayfield Woods MS 49. 6% 28. 9% 31. 0% Thomas Viaduct MS 30.0% 27.4% 0.0% Marriotts Ridge HS Burleigh Manor MS 18. 2% 26. 9% 31.4% Mount View MS 81.8% 73. 1% 68.6% 22 October 2019 HCPSS Comprehensive Redistrictlng Plan (2020-21 and 2023-24 School Years) Mission Road #13 Elkridge Landing MS 19. 9% Mayfield Woods MS 17. 0% Patuxent Valley MS 28. 6% Thomas Viaduct MS 34.4% Mt Hebron HS Dunloggin MS 17. 2% 16. 2% 30. 0% Ellicott Mills MS 21. 6% 26. 1% 26. 8% Patapsco MS 61. 2% 57. 8% 43. 1% Oakland Mills HS Ellicott Mills MS 0. 0% 19. 9% 38. 2% Lake Elkhorn MS 46. 6% 16. 3% 14. 3% Mayfield Woods MS 0. 0% 15. 4% 0. 0% Oakland Mills MS 53.4% 48. 4% 47. 5% Reservoir HS Hammond MS 11. 5% 0.0% 0.0% Lime Kiln MS 33. 0% 51.9% 60. 5% Murray Hill MS 41. 9% 33. 8% 39. 5% Patuxent Valley MS 13. 6% 14. 3% 0.0% River Hill HS Clarksville MS 45. 7% 49. 7% 49. 7% Folly Quarter MS 33. 3% 27. 5% 27. 5% Harpers Choice MS 0.0% 22. 9% 22. 9% Lime Kiln MS 21. 0% 0.0% 0.0% Wilde Lake HS Dunloggin MS 11.0% 0. 0% Harpers Choice MS 51. 1% 36. 6% 39. 2% Lake Elkhorn MS 0. 0% 0. 0% 0. 0% Wilde Lake MS 37.9% 55.4% 60.8% 22 October 2019 Table 5: ES-MS Feed Report for Current and Proposed Plans Current 2020-2021 2023-2024 Bonnie Branch MS Bellows Spring ES 0. 0% 22. 9% 22. 9% llchester ES 48. 3% 17. 2% 17. 2% Jeffers Hill ES 2. 1% 0.0% 0. 0% Phelps Luck ES 45. 4% 22. 1% 22. 1% Rockburn ES 4. 2% 0.0% 0. 0% Waterloo ES 0.0% 37. 8% 37. 8% Burleigh Manor MS Centennial Lane ES 56. 4% 56. 4% 49. 4% Manor Woods ES 27. 1% 28. 2% 33. 8% Northfield ES 15.4% 15. 4% 16. 8% Triadelphia Ridge ES 1. 1% 0.0% 0.0% Clarksville MS Clarksville ES 46. 2% 37. 0% 37. 0% Dayton Oaks ES 0. 0% 29. 5% 29. 5% Pointers Run ES 53. 8% 33. 4% 33. 4% Dunloggin MS Hollifield Station ES 6.7% 0. 0% 0. 0% Northfield ES 44. 7% 47. 7% 47. 3% St Johns Lane ES 11.6% 18. 1% 18. 2% Thunder Hill ES 5. 2% 0. 0% 0. 0% Veterans ES 31.8% 34. 2% 34. 5% Elkridge Landing MS Ducketts LaneES 0. 0% 44. 3% 44. 3% Elkridge ES 65. 9% 36. 0% 36. 0% Rockburn ES 34. 1% 19.7% 19. 7% Ellicott Mills MS llchester ES 0. 0% 33. 8% 33. 8% Thunder Hill ES 20. 6% 0. 0% 0. 0% Veterans ES 26. 5% 27. 6% 27. 6% Waterloo ES 17. 9% 0. 0% 0. 0% Worthington ES 35.0% 38. 6% 38.6% Folly Quarter MS Bushy Park ES 18. 3% 29. 7% 29. 7% Clarksville ES 0. 1% 0. 0% 0. 0% Dayton Oaks ES 31. 2% 16. 4% 16. 4% Triadelphia Ridge ES 50. 4% 53.8% 53.8% 22 October 2019 HCPSS Comprehensive Redlstrlctlng Plan (2020-21 and 2023-24 School Years) Glenwood MS Bushy Park ES 49. 6% 51. 4% 51. 4% Lisbon ES 50. 4% 48.6% 48. 6% Hammond MS Atholton ES 25. 8% 17. 3% 17. 3% Fulton ES 16.0% 0. 0% 0.0% Guilford ES 0.0% 21. 4% 21. 4% Hammond ES 58. 2% 61. 3% 61. 3% Harpers Choice MS Clarksville ES 0. 0% 32. 3% 32. 3% Longfellow ES 40. 1% 39. 3% 39. 3% Swansfleld ES 59. 9% 28.4% 28.4% Lake Elkhorn MS Atholton ES 0. 0% 20. 9% 20. 9% Clemens Crossing ES 0. 0% 33. 3% 33. 3% Cradlerock ES 41. 1% 29. 4% 29. 4% Guilford ES 26. 5% 0. 0% 0. 0% Jeffers Hill ES 24. 1% 0. 0% 0. 0% Swansfield ES 0. 0% 16. 5% 16. 5% Talbott Springs ES 8. 3% 0.0% 0.0% Lime Kiln MS Dayton Oaks ES 27. 9% 0. 0% 0.0% Fulton ES 58. 6% 65. 0% 65. 0% Laurel Woods ES 0. 0% 13.0% 13.0% Pointers Run ES 13. 5% 22. 0% 22. 0% Mayfield Woods MS Bellows Spring ES 29. 5% 17. 1% 17. 1% Deep Run ES 42. 4% 37. 4% 37. 4% Jeffers Hill ES 10. 0% 27. 6% 27. 6% Phelps Luck ES 0. 0% 17. 9% 17. 9% Waterloo ES 18. 1% 0.0% 0.0% Mount View MS Manor Woods ES 22. 5% 23. 6% 18. 0% Waverly ES 47. 5% 50. 3% 53. 9% West Friendship ES 30.0% 26. 2% 28. 1% Murray Hill MS German Crossing ES 54. 4% 53. 0% 53. 0% Laurel Woods ES 45. 6% 47. 0% 47. 0% 22 October 2019 Oakland Mills MS Atholton ES 9. 2% 0. 0% 0. 0% Stevens Forest ES 41. 2% 42. 9% 42. 9% Talbott Springs ES 35. 0% 15. 5% 15. 5% Thunder Hill ES 14.6% 41. 6% 41. 6% Patapsco MS Hollifield Station ES 48. 1% 60. 7% 60. 7% St Johns Lane ES 40. 6% 39. 3% 39. 3% Wave rly ES , 11. 3% 0.0% 0.0% Patuxent Valley MS Bollman Bridge ES 48. 9% 35. 3% 35. 3% Forest Ridge ES 51. 1% 46. 0% 46. 0% Guilford ES 0. 0% 18. 6% 18. 6% Thomas Viaduct MS Bellows Spring ES 10. 6% 0. 0% 0. 0% Ducketts Lane ES 36. 0% 0. 0% 0. 0% Elkridge ES 0.0% 28. 6% 28. 6% Guilford ES 9. 0% 0. 0% 0. 0% Hanover Hills ES 44. 3% 53. 5% 53. 5% Rockburn ES 0.0% 17.8% 17.8% Wilde Lake MS Atholton ES 0. 0% 0. 0% 0. 0% Bryant Woods ES 34. 7% 26. 4% 25. 1% Clemens Crossing ES 29. 7% 0. 0% 0. 0% Running Brook ES 35. 6% 47. 7% 45. 3% Talbott Springs ES 0. 0% 25.8% 29. 6% 3.1 High School Boundary Assessment The proposed HS attendance area changes relative to the current plan are presented in the attached Excel file, with HS boundary maps depicting the current and proposed attendance areas included as Figure 1, Figure 2, and Figure 3. Of note, the proposed attendance areas for Oakland Mills HS contain Polygon 1074 upon which Howard HS is sited. There are no students in polygon 1074 and it is not without precedent to similarly use this polygon (e. g., Waterloo ES currently passes through Polygon 1074 (assigned to Bonnie Branch MS) without any students feeding to Boimie Branch MS. Utilizing this approach, comparable capacity utilizations are achievable while moving considerably fewer students than suggested alternatives. There are no walkers to Howard HS from the north as it is bordered by Route 100. 22 October 2019 HCPSS Comprehensive Redistricting Plan (2020-21 and 2023-24 School Years) Figure 1: Current HS Boundaries Figure 2: Proposed HS Boundaries for 2020-2021 ..>^- rf^r EiS%.( na 22 October 2019 3.2 Middle School Boundary Assessment The proposed MS attendance area changes relative to the current plan are presented in the attached Excel file, with MS boundary maps depicting the current and proposed attendance areas included as Figure 4, Figure 5, and Figure 6. Significantchanges to the MS attendance areas are needed to balance capacity and better align the MS-HS feeds. The system-wide capacity utilization at the MS level is m excess of 105% based on projected emollment in school year 2023-2024. 10 22 October 2019 HCPSS Comprehensive Redlstrictlng Plan (2020-21 and 2023-24 School Years) Figure 4: Current MS Boundaries Figure 5: Proposed MS Boundaries for 2020-2021 School Year J- >-L .II Tf. -n ?.it fw »> *« »»* itw fti 11'* »' Figure 6: Proposed MS Boundaries for 2023-2024 School Year 22 October 2019 11 3.3 Elementary School Boundary Assessment The proposed ES attendance area changes relative to the current plan are presented in the attached Excel file, with ES boundary maps depicting the current and proposed attendance areas mcluded as Figure 7, Figure 8, and Figure 9. Thunder Hill ES could be used to further relieve crowding to the north when the Oakland Mills MS renovation project is completed without introducing a small feed. The additional seats at Talbott Springs ES are used to great effect in the proposed 2023-2024 plan by balancing FARM ratios and relieving overcrowding (e. g., Centennial Lane ES) to the north. 12 22 October 2019 HCPSS Comprehensive Redistricting Plan (2020-21 ana XUZS-'M School Years) /^- - Figure 7: Current ES Boundaries Figures: Proposed ES Boundaries for 2020-2021 School Year *T^>--^ Figure 9: Proposed ES Boundaries for 2023-2024 School Year 22 October 2019 13 CTMU-ia BirolliiwntPfcjtCUBiu Enntount SchaBlVur ISchnnlYmr SchoolY< School Tear SchoolVeir Projected School Asstgnments ZOWZCBl MZ1-MZ2 Tcaa-vss 102^3024 2B24-Z1B5 i IM51 HS ilhUlt ilMSIt CunNitES Maa. 2ini. ES vas-wutf CumntMS BHB-ZBUMS anwBMw CurnntHS a«t3-a*Ht This chart shows the offldal school year 2018. 19 . nrnlmant, «nd pn?feccedenroNment for eadi polwon. The enrellmmte . n pnMnted 60 27 191 56 31 31 57 30 33 SB 30 B S6 29 37 SS 29 B7 Fiwttst RMga ES |Fanit RIdga ES irwt WStf ES IPatumntValley ME PatumntVdleyMS IPahnentVillefMS IRcsenofrHS lllBienmirHS IHammcnd HS by school tevel. School Bsilinmtnts for M19. 20 and aadi of the 56 43 43 5S i7 49 56 3S 49 55 34 50 54 35 50 54 3B 50 Laural Wands ES ILaunlWDodiES Launl Wondi ES iMumy Hill MS Mui7avHniM5 IMuirayHHIMS IRasenfBlrHS iwairHS (werrotrHS FeaslbDNvStudy aptioni am Indudnd, i 95 49 W| 94 S3 B6 SB SZ 66 57 51 69 56 53 TO 9S SB 71 CroufngES ILaurel Woods ES laurel WoodiES IMunayHillMS WurnvHIBMS |Mutn»HniMS llhnnotrKS IReservoirHS snmlrHS 17 17 17 16 16 17 HS Riraat Ridga ES |Fanrt RUga ES FomrtRldBeES IPihnent Valley MS int Valley MS iiisntVallefMS imond iHannondHS IMtoton Roid 1113 HCPSSfalkiimtha Mafylmd State Otpirtmuitof Educatfon and the 79 47 69; 79 48 71 47 TO ea 46 TO 79 SO 72 az ao 4a 73 iorarun Craw'iit ES 1Crusting ES in OuHfng E5 IMunafHIIIMS IMunayHMMS |Murra»HIIIM5 lAthnltan HS lAtholtanHi indHS NationalCtnttr for EducattonStatistia" auldriina farpmtectlns W 34 52 73 39 54 77 S3 54 79 39 55 7B 41 57 77 A3 SBI ionnan Crossing ES lanCmniniES lan CraiDr^g ES |MurrayHIIIMS 'MuiniyHBIMS IMurray Hni MS Ifttholton HS lAtlulton HS IndHS student pffvacyfh public nportinrndBuppmunspapulatfoni that farr so M «a| 51 it 42 152 31 41 50 32 42 S2 il « Sl 32 «| FutonES IFuttonES IFulton E5 indhflS |Um«ainMS lUnuKllnMS |R*w«wtrHS |RTnro)rH5 IRKennfrHS balow 10; ptmiitages that an lui than or equal to S, or greater than 41 27 19 43 16 S 44 35 30 43 n 31 43 n 3S 43 27 33 iltonES IFultmiES Fultnn ES KilnhflS KHnMS KllnMS iRtunwIrHS EimirHS isfrHS ora^ualto 9S;catBgorfu ilnctlf ntottd to tptafic studentremnfe; 31 15 19 30 U ZO 30 U 21 30 IS 2i 30 IS 24 Z9 19 241 IFltlUMlES :hiltan ES indMS lUmalOlnhre KllnMS IRcsenolrHS IRusnmlrHS |R*nnB(rHS anil/nrlnfDmiatBnthrt. whanctiniblnidwtthothn'puUldvacusslble aa 21 ;z | 37 21 ZS 36 21 2B 37 22 29 as a » M 21 M| imondES IHamraond ES imnnd ES ihdMS imond MS iinand MS lAthDltnn MS lAtholton H5 lAtholton HS B 15 1B 3Z 20 12 31 10 IS s2 a is SZ 10 2S Sl 21 271 tiain»tiond ES indES indMS inundMS lAthnltnnHS lAtbslfcmHS lAtholton HS 23 13 26 11 U Z6 11 1Z 25 12 li 25 IZ 14 Z6 11 141 Forest Ridge ES IFana Ridge ES Foreit Rldga ES IPBtumntUBllayMS entVaBeyMS iiuntVilltyMS ifrHS inrolrHS imnnd HS 40 U 17 42 23 19 141 15 21 www W 15 27 41 2G »| AthBHanES lAthdtnnES UUholtnnES indMS imnndMS indMS iinondHS IHammand MS 42 16 25 44 26 15 43 IS 27 43 29 29 41 29 32 42 29 341 Atholton E5 lAthaltan ES Athoton ES IHammndMS iimnd MS lond HS iraond HS |l37 SB 70| UZ ffi 7S 1142 86 » 139 SO M US 90 IBB1BOIU5 51 UiaftthnllftthnlhniES imondES imandES indMS IHammMd MS inundMS iinoitdHS inndHS imondHS 21 * 22 * * 21 U * 21 ID K iltonES lAthaltan ES AUiiltonES IHanmndMS )ndM5 imondHS imnnd HS 64 34 « 64 41 44 64 42 46 6Z 43 49 63 42 SZ 62 « 54 idES iniondES imnundES IHammndMS indMS inwndHS imondHS imnndHS M 23 1B 24 17 19 23 16 20 23 16 21 23 16 21 23 1G 22 iincndES iGullfbri£S iHfoidES >ndM5 snt Valley MS IPatuiientValleyMS iinondKS imnnd HS imnndKS 5B 44 71 SG U 65 55 40 W 56 W 64 55 3S 64 57 38 6i CanunnWtantES ICantNinial Lan* ES Canfnitial lam ES iBuriBWManor MS IBinltlghMtonorMS IBurtehh Minor MS ICentenntalHS ICentennbl K5 iiWnitfalHS 36 Z7 44 37 22 36 M 20 34 38 ZO 34 39 19 34 40 19 34 BollnunBridge E5 |BollmanBrfdga ES BollnunBrfdga ES IPrtuuntVilltyMS :Paituxent Valley MS IIWumntVillayMS idHS imond HS 30 26 271 33 IB 2B 132 17 37 3S 16 37 35 IS 27 35 16 27 BallmanBridge £5 IBollnunBildBtES :BoanunBridge E5 pntuxwitVallayMS IPatunnt \Wll*y MS IPatiBNntValltyMS IHunmattdHS IHammond M iMhsla RindM3 16 in BFiifgtES BollmanBrMge E5 IPatunntValley MS int ValleyMS IPatuiientValleyMS inundHS IHaramnnd MS Minlni1Road t»li 73 41 «I 75 41 4t |76 39 SO 76 39 80 37 ao SS 54 BollmmBridges iBnllnnnBridge ES iBolbnm Bridge ES IFituxentVallByMS iFatuiintVdteyMS IPttiMtntVallByMS IHamnundKS IHamiDDDdHS Mlsdoi1Road K13 3S 50 53 1104 56 50 . 99 101 51 50 ins K 109 50 66 iBridgtES iBollmanBriiigt ES BBllmmBridge E5 IPatunntVallerMIS intVdleyMS IFatuicentValleyMS inundHS imnnd HS 1RBK) tll3 3B 13 17 40 21 24 |W ZO 15 40 TO 43 19 20 V BalKnwiBridgtE; IBBllinanBridg* ES 'MI[minBridg«£S IPahuentValley MS IPatiBentVdteyMS IPatuuntValley M5 idHS. M[a(anRoad »U ES 33 17 23 32 15 32 31 15 21 30 14 29 14 13 2! iunfard iGuilfnn!ES iHfoidES IThoraiiVladurtMS int Valley MS IPatuientValleyMS id MS imnnd HS . Ran)ttli 29 12 TO 26 U 17 Z7 t2 17 29 U 34 U 12 IB SulttordES IBullfontES lilfordES ITlinmwVtadiictMS !PatiniwrtVa11^MS IPatuuntVall^MS idrts MIafnn Riad «13 35 31 63 32 25 56 32 24 54 32 22 30 22 2Z 45 QarimfllleES ICIaricsifflleES a»ksuiii»ES ICIarkWIiltMS HBFpeisChofceMSiHarpinCholnMS . Hill HS IRhtrHniHS RherHIIIHS 4t 29 461 AS za <'. 146 29 44 44 29 44 28 IS 45 WavertyES IWwutfES WanriyES IMountVtew MS !MauMV[«wMS IMauntVteiwMS IMan-innsRhlgtHS !M . 14 * 15 14 lAthaltnn ES IftthnltnnES lAtholMn ES Itlammond MS IHltnmand MS IHamnwnd MS Itiamntojid HS |H*mmond HS iHammnndHS 87 » AS 65 90 44 as 44 91 13 45 65 ICndlanicltES ICradlamd; ES ICradlanidtES Itaka Elkharn MS lUtoElkhomMS llaka Bkhoffl MS lOaklandMllltHS lOaMandMHIiHS lOridandMilltHS 39 27 S9 21 35 37 20 35 20 34 20 U 32 pi lbottSprintsES ISttfinnsFartrtES IStnmni Forest ES lOaUandMBtsMS lOddand Mills MS lOiklandMills MS lOaklandMllliHS lOrilindMtlliHS Oakland MllliHS 44 2B 45 23 35 44 21 43 21 43 20 21 H DefferaHniES IJifhrs Hill E5 [lefftn MINES ILake Elkhorn MS IMayffeld Woods MS iMayflddWoods MS lOiklandMills HS ICaUandMnisHS IMteston Road )(13 19 U 15 70 10 U 16 . CmutngES l&mintflitd ES |Swi»Bili!ES IWilihLikBMS |L*«ElkhBmMS \lsl» BkhomMS IftthaltonHS lAtboltanHS |*thaltonHS 23 10 10 23 10 11 13ISteventForartES IStevemForutES IStevens FofBtt ES lOaMandMfllsMS loaklandMlllf MS lOaklandMilh MS lOaklindMills HS lOAIandMnisHS 'OaklandMllli HS 14 14 ES rTiilbatt ES HS is li 17 U 17 * F»lbBttSprfng>ES iT.lbntt Springs Springs |0»U«ndMniiMS |OaU>ndMllliMS lOiklmdMIteMS lOaktandMllliHS lOaMindMllliHS .OaklandMills 64 21 36 45 1107 41 133 45 146 50 56 58 IPoIntereRunES IFolnten Run ES IPalnteisRunES laartauilla MS ICIariBifflle MS rteifllleMS IftthDltonHS lAthokon HS ftthnlton HS 15 11 14 U 13 14 10 14 W 14 » 10 M HhundfHIIIES IPhBlptLudtES phtlpiLuckES lElltottMllltMS |M»ffftUWoadiMS IMaynddWoodsMS IHamrd HS IHBwaid H5 WounntHS 29 * 32 13 15 35 13 34 U 35 14 15 16 CroHlngES liwuisfleld ES ISiranrfftkl ES IWIUe Lake hU ILateElkhomMS ILike ElkhornMS IWIIito Ld» HS lAtholton HS ftthotton HS o o ooo 0 0 0 0 o o 0 0 IIhundf MINES IThuntTHHIES nhundn-tllll ES lElltottMllltMS lOrthndMllltMS lOakfandMniaMS IHmrardHS IDaUand Mills HS OaUandMilta HS 39 27 41 24 39 43 23 W 23 43 23 Z4 36 IPhelpsLucltES IFhelps Luck ES IPtietpiLuckES IBonnte Branch MS ileBrandiMS IBonnte Branch MS irdHS irdHS Howard HS 25 17 27 16 17 27 15 38 15 2» 15 16 20iFhalpiLuckES IWrtwtoaES [WaCrlOBES iBomiteBranch MS ilBBmndiMS IBonirt* Branch MS |LengR*KhHS llnngRtaehHS InngRuehHS 29 27 30 19 24 31 17 31 17 37 17 U 25 IPhelpsLuckES IPhelps Luck ES IPhelpsLuckES IBannte Branch MS WayfiddWoods MS IMayTield Woods MS ILoni Reach HS ILon* Reach HS LontRuchHS SB 33 5S 33 SB S3 31 56 3D S7 Z9 30 41 [JeffuiHIIIES |Dnp Run E5 |Dup Run ES iMivfielilWwdtMB ;Ma»fletdWoodiMS iMayftoldWoods MS |LongReach HS iLong Reich HS lonBRnchMS 75 3S 76 2B 44 77 34 78 37 BO M 40 46 IStJahntLarES IVatarani ES Vrtii sES |Patapin MS DunkiggInMS |DunlngginMS IMtHabmnHS 'Ml Habnin HS Cantannial HS 16 IWrterknES .WrttriooES IMayfteld Woods MS Bonnlt Branch MS IBonnte Branch MS ILong Reach HS Long Reach HS Long Reach tiS 1B 11 U 11 IThunderHIIIES TllundBfHHIES IBBcDttMilltMS Oakland Milli MS IGulduiifMnisMS ltd HS Oakland MllltHS Oakland Mfili MS 70 33 G6 39 41 63 39 43 W M SB W 37 48 WateriocES IPhclpsLuckES . PhripiLuckES |M»yfitlil Woods MS Ma»fleldWoodiMS IMayBtlilWBodtMS ILongRuchHS Long Reach KS LongReahHS tl03 48 102 55 52 97 54 56 95 52 90 50 51 64 Waterioo ES IWatertooES WateriooES IMayBeld Woods MS Bonnla Branch MS IBannte Branch MS ILoni Reach HS Long Reach HS Long Reach HS 30 10 zg is 17 30 IS 17 30 15 29 15 U 19 Billinn SpringES iBBUowaSpring ES BallounStirtngES IMayfltkt Woods MS MarfddWoodiMS iMavfteldWDDdtMS|LongReach MS Long Beach KS Long Reach HS u * 17 * 11 DMp RunES UarfanHniES Jrfhn Hill ES IMiyftald Woadi MS MayflridWoDdiMS IMavfaldWBBdlMS ILnl^RuchHS LangRiachHS LongRuchHS 14 . u DupRunES |Dup Run E5 Deep Run ES IMayfitkt Woods MS Mffletd Woods MS iMaffielilWDBdiMS |LongReach HS Long Reich HS LongRnchHS 1104 46 106 54 4B 1111 S3 S3 114 M 117 S3 56 S3 Deep Run ES IBeltowsSpriMES BallUM Spring ES IMayfiald Wondi MS MayfieldWondiMS IMayffelif Woods MS ILont Reach HS (adHS IfdHS |U4 60 Mi 73 61 1154 72 68 15B 7Z 163 71 74 S3 Bup Run ES |D««p Run E5 :DeepRun ES IMayfitkl Woods MS MarfIddWoodiMS iMavftoldWmdiMS iLnngRuchHS Long Reich MS Mtnton (toad ltt3 5S 26 56 29 29 57 29 il 56 la 57 is 29 35 B.llcuiuSpring ES IDuckrtta lair ES Duduttt Lan* £S iMayft.U Woodl MS EllcHrtglUndlngMS lElltrklg*Landing MS |Loqg Rtrfi HS LangnaashKS igRnchHS RocttumES IBelknmSpring £5 BtlloiBSprfltgES |Bkridg>Landli ; |MS| HS 5 IMSI HS IMSIHS ilMSIHS SIMSIHS CuinntES aan-aoiEs CumntMS MUB-IOUMS W9-WUW CuwntHS aa». atti(B SSWMW Thischart shimn tht otfleialuhaal ywrZOlB-U enrollmentand nrolecttd enrolmtnt faraadi pglwion. The enrollmentt an DTtfntul llkhesterES IBalknnSpring E5 |B*llBmSprfnig ES IBannfe Branch MS IBanntt Branch MS IBonnl* Braneh MS iHmnidHS |HoiTdH5 IHinnidHS IRockburn ES |Bd)aw> SpringES |e«llmn SpringES iHtridBeLindlngMS IBonnle Branch MS |BanniiBranch MS iHowiid HS irdHS IHBwaid HS 17 U Z71 2B 1B 24 2B 17 M| 18 18 241 28 U 2S| 2B 13 25 IRodiburnES IRodibum ES IRo^ifaumES lEltridB" LmiflnB MS lEltoktBelandbigMS lilkrtdgaLanding MS iHmnidHS irdHS IHBward HS 60 521 82 S3 W 70 ai 4a 81 46 71 81 47 70 ItlrfwifrES llfcbtrterES NlchtsttrES IBonnte Branch MS IBonnto Brand) MS IBonnte Branch NC IHowaid HS lardHS |LDngft«arfiHS 31 34 31 21 29 20 as I 30 19 341 30 18 33 3D 19 3Z IIIihuttrES |IICb8tt«rES |lkhErt«rES IBonnte Branch MS IBonnte Branth MS iBonnhBranch MS iHowaidHS lid HS ILnitiaaachHS lllchtrtirES lllchesterES lllchcsttrES IBonnte Branch MS lEllicnttMllllMS lElllcnttMnisMS IHoward HS lOaMlndMniiHS lOiklind Mllli H5 iBacMiuniES 10udi>tttl*n« E! IDudntteLineES IBonnle Branch MS lElkridgtLanitingMS |Elkridla«L»iinnBMSiHowaidKS IHowaidHS [Lnng Rweh KS IBacdbumES |Ouclmttst«ntES IDuckittiLuieES lEtliridaelandlngMS lElkridgaLanding MS lElkridgtLintfngMS IHowaid HS lardHS [LangR.arfiKS 4S M «| U 29 4Z| 46 Z8 W IWnthlwon ES |Worthh(gtan ES IWorthlngtBn ES iHBtBttMnitMS IEtltnrttMllllM5 lElllmttMnitMS iMtHdironHS lOdUandMtlfiHS lOakland Mills MS IWnrthlngtT ES iThundTHIIIES IThuntltrHHIES IBHcon Mills MS lOaldaidMMtMS lOaklindMIUsMS InffiHebronHS lOaWandMnisHS lOakl. nd Mllla MS 51 ZB 29 40 |4S 27 48 27 401 4» Z7 40| 49 ZS 401llldicsttrES IWatirtaa ES IWatuloaES IBonnte Branch MS IBonnte Branch Itffi IBonnf* Bruish MS iHowird KS laid KS IHoinrdHS 1KB 65 55 86 11U 57 1114 59 88 119 61 B6 118 ea MI ISttwiu Forest E5 IThunderHIIIES IThunderHIIIES lOaiMandMHIsMS IQaUaidMniiMS lOiklandMrtlsMS lOiMani Mills HS lOaMandMllliHS lO.Uind MlltaMS 1131 72 ai as 1116 Bl [us aa US 7S Ul| 119 78 1111ICenttiHilalLaneES ICBntannlalLineES INortMleld ES |Burlrii)iM>nwMS IBuritlgh Manor MS |0unkigg[nMS ICuttwinlil KS ICtntennlalHS IMtHtbrunHS 45 Z7 2B 37 4Z U 41 17 991 3B 27 391 41 26 39|IWateriooES |TalbottSprii(gtES |TalbattSprinpES iBlicoBMilltMS |WMeLakt MS IWIIde Lalci MS iHawtrd MS IWtldeLakeHS IWIIdeLakeHS |iio si 68 W 11U 70 1122 70 74 13S 75 77 U8 75 TO|IWorthlngtm ES llkhiiterES llfchesterES lEllfBDttMlllanflS |HBwttMill«MS lElllcatt Mills MS IMtHehronKS IMtHtliunHS |0«lil«ndMllltHS SB M 37 47 ss aa S3 36 511 50 36 Sl I 51 35 521IWatErioaES |TalbottSprii(gtES iTalbottSpring* ES |BllmttMllliM5 IWHdelaktMS IWIIifa Laka MS ICBirtmnlalMS IWtldeLafceHS IWIIdeLateHS 51 26 47 M 44 » 44 S3 471 43 33 481IVetenrnES IVttaraiuES IVrtarauES IBUCBUMIIIIMS lEMcnttMills MS lEllkaittMllllMS ICiMKintolMS llMtlandMllltHS lOaktandMills MS 23 ZS il 15 2G ZO 14 26|IVrtirani ES IVetEransES IVtterans ES IBIlcottMllltMS lEUleaBMilliMS lEllfcottMills M5 ICentennlal HS ICentennlal HS |MtH«bmnHS 76 52 49 75 TO 48 6B 46 7S 66 46 74 66 44 74|IV«tiinntES IVrtmnsES IVdtiimES IBIIontt Mills MS laUBOUMIIhMS lEllkarttMllliMS ICentennlal HS ICenunnlal HS IWtHtbniiiHS 3S Z7 20 35 32 19 31 IS 31 30 la »I 30 17 29|IVrteransES - IWorthlngtonES IWorthlngtonES iDunlngginMS lEllilwttMllltMS lEllkott Mills MS IMtHabronHS IMtHthranHS iMtHtbrenHE 37 * a is 37 17 36 IS IS as is 19] M IS 201iHollKfddStaUonES IWnrthlntton E5 IWorthlngKin ES IDunlonlnMS lElllesttMllltMS lElltecttMllltMS IhUHcbninHS IMtHehronXS iMtHabronHS 95 33 26 36 94 31 99 K 37 S7 37 3B 39 39 W\ |StJahniL»ir£S IVtteranaES IVtteransES i&unloggln MS IDunlcgglnMS iDunlagginMS iMtHcbronHS ICentennlal HS ICcntennlal HS |2(B 68 1W 1091|196 (M 119|UO 120 12E]U5 izo fas 184 U7 1381IHolllfftldStatfnnES iHBllffhldStrtlBnES iHollffWdStation ES iPrtapscaMS IRatapsmMS IPrtaptuMS iMtHabronHS IMtHtbronHS ICnitennlal HS 50 13 32 M 53 34 51 34 381 50 34 391 SO 34 41 IHolimdd Station E5 IHalimald Station ES IHalliflridStaBanES ;P*t»p»CB MS IPatapsco MS IPataptnMS IMtHrtranHS lliAtHtbronHS IMtHebronH5 IU7 a IU . 124!|200 ffi ua]is4 u; U6| US U3 MflUe 120 l 79 51 64 77 51 68 7B 49 66 77 48 6B 76 49 69 76 51 iLauralWoods ES IFultonES IFulton ES IMunayHIIIMS |Um«MIn MS iLlim KllnMS IRennmlrHS inulrHS IRuarvoirHS U U IS 21 11 V 21 U ^B] 22 12 1B IV u 22 U 17 [RunES IPoiiitanRunES IPDlnttnRunES |Um«KtnM5 lchritmax MS Idaiknrtllt MS IReienolrHS IRhurHDIHS iRtutfHill HS 16 12 IPolntirsRunES IFolnteisRunES IFolntersRunES ICIarimdle MS ICIartinnia MS lairimrllte MS lAtholton HS lAfholunHS lAthoiton HS 52 31 4Z Sl 32 fl 52 U 4Z lEIWdgtES |Hkndg8ES lElfcrtdBeES ISkrtdgelandfritMS mi oinasVItduilMS |Tlia.i»»>W»du«MS iHww.^HS IKinumlHS IMIsrionSnadBU 17 101 17 11 17 11 u '' u 1Z la 12 IPolnlanRunES IPninwrs Run ES IPointan Run ES |UmeCTn MS ICItrinvnit MS laariimllle MS IRtsmnlrtfS iRiwrHHIHS iRlm-HIIIHS IFouittraRunES indES IHtnnor>d'E5 ICtorknriltahe innndMS IHammondMS [AtholtonHS lAUioltnnHS |Atho(tanMS lt2S 53 79 IZi 67 87 119 66 M liai 64 1135 65 94 1134 6g 94 IPclnttisRunES indES indES ICIaitavKte MS imnnd MS iHanmndMS lAtholton MS lAtholton HS lAthaltonHS S7 3E 54| S5 33 SS 55 32 53 56 31 57 M SIj 57 U 51 IPBlnttn Run Ei IPolnlaiii Run B IPolnten Run ES ICIaiknfteMS ICIariuvMeMS laarknMKMS lAUialtonHS [ftthnltonHS |Atho(tonHS 45 Z4 42 43 26 40 44 25 39 44 24 24 40. 45 35 39 IPDlntaraRunES lairknfllt E5 laaiknllle E5 ICIartmrnte MS ICIaiksrille MS laarkwilla MS lAtholton MS lAthoton HS lAthdton HS 66 12 131 7S 16 26 79 2S 2>| 79 30 31 34] 79 33 36 |aemtniCroulr<|E5 ISmuffahlES ISwaiBfleld ES IwndttalnMS |l*lwEIKiamMS |t*1» BkhninMS lAtholtnnHS t*ttlote)l>HS lAthofton HS 45 22 B5 51 21 34 54 22 33 5S 23 56 23 34 5G 24 M IQnntni Qnitlng ES nmiCnmlngES lacimniOnsilnBES iWHdeLakeMS ILakeElkhomMS ILak* Elkliam MS lAthoton MS [AtheltonMS lAthdton H5 30 201 S3 . 13 P 36 U 18 IS 36 1B 19; 37 16 20 IdBmftni Crouiiij E5 IQnnNlt Crauing ES lawnuia Crauini ES IWndtLaluMS iLakaElkhomMS ILate EIUiom MS lAriinltonHS [AUiaKDnHS [AthiKtonHS 87 42 9l| 93 <2 77 97 43 721|U» 46 SB 46 7Z UH 47 72 IBryaitWaoilaES IQanwia Crbaing ES |a«m«nE Cniudig ES IWfldeLafctMS llakeElkhomMS ILafceElkhom MS lAtholtonHS IXtholton MS lAthaltonHS W U 141 si M n M"U 171 33 15 34 16 181 35 16 18 IQemensCrossing ES ISwiudeUES ISinnrilsld ES IWIldetalnMS |Lak*ElkhamMS |Lak»Elkhom MS IWHdeLakeHS lAtholtonHS IAtho(tonHS 56 4S 49 52 29 3B 53 27 37 51 25 E3 23 37 S2 24 35 |Sw»infltldES lairimflle ES laaikmllle ES MS laariauilla MS IWndiLatoHS [RhrarHniHS IniwHIIIHS 10 IRunnlnig Bnuit ES iBivmtWBBdiES iBryantWoodiES IWNdtlakthrtS IWIIdeLaktMS IWiUe Lalu US |WIU*L»t»HS [WPdttaltttfS |Wikl« LataMS IBryant Woods ES |BryantWoods ES |BryantWoods ES IWHdttakaMS IWHdalikaMS IWIMtLate MS IWHdeLakeHE IWIIdeLateHS IWIUe Lake H5 M 41 71 3S 35 ISwamfield E5 ISwantfcMES ISwansfltld E5 |HarpenChain MS iHirpanChaluMS |H»iar* Chain MS IWndeLakeHS IWHdeLateHS IWIkttLakeHS E U Z6 32 16 2Z ICfadlKwtES ICndlBrockES l&adlemkES ILakeElkhomMS ILite Elkhom M5 ILake EIMiom MS IDaklandMllltHS ItWllandMilltHS lOaUmd Milta MS ISwaniitold ES ISinwthlilES |Swn»n«ldES iHBFputChnlnMS IHupwi Choice MS IHwptis Choice MS IWItdaLakeHS IWHdaLakeHS IWIIdalakeHS 21 10 13 ZZ 10 12 ILongfdlow ES ILangfellaw ES ILongfdlowES IHarpBn Cholu MS IHaiptftCholuMS iHirptB ChoiceMS IWtldelakeHS IWHdelakeHS IWIIdt Like H5 a 37 » 64 32 30 66 Bl 31 « BO sa M es so i5 ILcngftllnw ES iLongfellowE5 ItongMtoiirES IHaipenChoice MS IHiriius Choice MS |HaipanChain MS |wnd*L*k«Hs |wnd*L«k*Hs |Wlk(«L*l<>HS 44 Z4 39 46 Zl 28 47 Zl 28 48 ZO W 19 49 20 17 ILoflgftlluuES ILinvfdlBWES iLongWlowES |H»rpBB Choice MS IHupen Choln MS IHarpen Choice MS IWHdeLakeHS IWHdeLateHS IWildeLakeHS 18 * u " ILongrrilowES iLongfrilowB ILongfaBawES |Harp«n Chnif MS IHwiw* Chotct MS |H«ip«nChain MS IWIIdetafctHS IWHdeLakeHS IWIIdeLakeHS MS. 16 . 17 * IRunnfng Brook ES |Runnfng BroiA ES |RunnlngBrook ES IWBd* Laka MS IWBd* Lak« MS IWilitt Like MS IWtldelakeHS IWndeLaktHS IWIMtLakeHS M6 Z7 21 U| 28 U 28 13 201 30 12 a u M 12 U IRunnfrtgBrook ES inuiwlngBrook ES IRunnlngBronk £5 |W8d8lak*MS IwadttakeMS IWilifaLtlm MS IWIIdeLakeHS IWndeLateHS IWIUeLrtBHS . m w s\ B9 45 51 70 44 SB 71 44 70 43 72 43 60 ICentennlilLineES ICurtwinlil LaneES ICmtannlalLaneES iBurielghManor MS IBuridghManarMS IBurlalghManor MS |C»nt This chart she ; IM51 HS S IMSI HS ilhMlt ilMSIt tlMSIt Curmrt 6S VWI-JKtlES aCW-ZBMK 2CID-ZOZ1M5 was-svuwa CunntHS jswwaiM 20WMW the officialtchnri ytar ZOU-19cnrollmtnt, i DTOlectedcni linentfor uch poliiDn. Thi anrollmtnts are DI . Woods ES ;htano WaoifaES IMaiuTWnodiES Mount Vl*w MS !MauntVI»»ilMS iMmntViewMS |ManlDttiR[( I Ml 51 134 65 89 11ZB 66 IU4 66 1111 64 941 121 64 9S Vwrani ES VatnaniES IVetannsES Dunlo 1MS OuntogifnMS DunloulnMS ICentennlal HS ICenttnnlal HS I Ml Kebrnn MS . ZS 14 ZS 13 » 26 12 zs la Z7 13 ZOI ZS 13 ZO D^tonOaksES :1H»de|(ihlaRldga ES |Triai»elplibWd(BES KllnMS FnllyQuanTMS RillyUuartTMS iRhnrHMHS IRhmrHMHS IRhnrHHIHS za is 29 17 30 30 17 M 18 19 291 32 19 28 DaytonOaks ES . Dayton Oaks E5 IDayttwi Oaki ES Klln MS QarkBfllleMS CtariawllltMS iRlmHniHS -HtBHS IRIverHKIHS . w U * ;B u * u * Oayuin Oata E5 ;0iytan 0>ka ES_ IDaytmi Orto-ES -KllnMS Folly Quirttr MS FallyauirtirMS IWmrHIUHS Hill MS iRhwrHIUHS IS lO 17 16 19 * 17 .' OWDnOaksES iDavton Oaki ES IDflytoh Qakfl ES Kiln MS RallyOuartT MS FollyQu. rter MS IRInrHUl HS HilIHS IRhnrHHIHS 10 17 OiytonOikaES [Witalphta RlitgsE5 |niadelph[aRidge ES KllnMS FollyQuirtar MS FollyOuTttr MS iRhnrHillHS iRhm-HillMS IRnwrHniHS . .Iphl. Rlrig.ES iTfliitolphfi RfdgtES ! KllnMS folly Quarter MS Folly OuarttrM5 HIIIHS IRhmrHIIIHS IRhmrHniHS DaymnOakiES IDiaytonOdu ES IDayton Oalo ES FnllyOuarttrMS folly quar-r MS MlyUuirtTMS iRhmrHtllHS IRhnrHMI HS IRIverHBIHE OaytnnOalcsES TrladetphlaRUge ES ITrtailelphta Ridge ES Rilly Quarter MS lily Ouarter MS FallyOuarUrMS IRInrHniHS -HfflHS IRhrerHniHS OiytnitOBkiES TrtadtlphlaRldgt ES IWBdelphlaRtdgeESFollf Quarter MS IFolly Quarter M5 FiillvOuirterMS IRhnrHMHS IRimrHfUHS iRiwrHniHS lyunOakaES fTrladalphiaRidg* ES [TriaiialphtaRidiiES Folly Quartar MS fallyOuartBrMS Follyi»u»rt«r MS iRlnrHKIHS . HIUHS IRIverHniHS OaytDnOaksES IDaytonOaks ES [DaytonOaks ES illyOuarttrMS folly QuarterMS RrilyQuartarMS iRhrrHIUHS iRhnrffiUHS iRlwrHIUHS RunningBrook ES |Br»antWoodiES IBryant Woods E5 Wilde Lake MS WlldiLakeMS WHdeLdkeMS IWBdeLakeHS IwndetakaHS IWfldBUiktHS 21 . » I O^tnnOakiES IDa/ien Oate E5 IDiytonOukiES illyQuartarMS Follyduirtar MS Folly Quirtir MS IGIenettHS irigHS |Glen«l»HS Dayton Oaks ES iDaytanOaktES lOayton Oala ES illy Quarur MS FallvOuartTMS hillyEhrrterMS leienalgHS iHS [SlendtHS IS * 1Z DB»innOaks£S IDayton Data ES IDayinn Oaks ES lily QuarterMS FBllyOuarurMS hillvarrtwMS |Glm*fgHS jefeHS iGltndgHS DftonOiteES IDuytonOakiES IDaytonOBlsES illyQuirtirMS Folly Quirter MS FollrauarterM5 IGIendgHS |GlenetgHS [GlenelgHS Tnaddphli RUn«ES iBushyParkES |Buih»PiikES Folly Quarter MS FollfQNUtarMS Folly diiirtir MS IGIanelgHS wlgHS [alunalgHS Triaddphia Rklga ES IButhyParkES IButhyParitES Folh/QuartarMS FollyQuBrtT MS FollyOuartBr MS |GleirIg KS i MS [GlmdgHS 85 56 671 ST SS 73 a y. 7i » y. 7i BO 5Z 73 7S 51 75 BuihyPakES IBushyPaikES |BuihyParkES lily QuarterMS id MS GlenwDodlWB IGIeiutgHS |GI*n*l8HS .GlmtlgHS 31 21 33 30 19 Z9 zg ig 29 29 U 2B 28 17 28 Z7 17 27 BushyParitES |BushyPaikE5 IBushyParitES Stenwood MS StemuMd MS food MS IGIenelgHS IGIane^HS |GI«fl«lgHS <5 21 27] 45 29 M 42 »»I 4Z U 3I| 41 27 34 39 16 35 ;BushvPadtES iBuriffPirkES iBuihfPirkES StamwgdMS ilimwnd MS GlnnreodMS iGlanditf; nelgHS IGIendgHS . iifaES WoodiES BurtalghManor M: BuriB[EhM*narMS BuiletghManor MS ICmttnnlil KS IMirrkittsRldlBeHS IMairiotts Ridge K5 IBinhyPaifcES IBushyPaikES IBuihyParfcES GlenwoodMS Glenwiodhffi GlenwoodMS |Glana|jHS |Gltn*tHS |Gl»n«(gtfS irkES IBushyParkES IBushyParitES Folly Quarter MS Follr Quarter MS FallvauanerMS nehHS rlgHS [GlniBlgHS , ES IVfnnsES IVrtirani ES itt Mild MS BIIcnttMlBiMS 'ElttcottMllltMS iMtHtbnnHS IMtHebnnHS IMtHebronHS fphli Ridge ES |BushyPaikE5 IBushyFaikES Folly auarter MS Folly Quarter MS Folly OuartwM5 IGIeneli HS |51ene|i HS IGIcndgHS u u t2 12 INorthddd ES INarthfftlllES INcrthfllld ES HS HS KS 13 * DunbgglnMS . Durtlbggtn MS iDunlouln MS ICmfnnlil ICmtennlil |C«ntninlil 13 19 22 14 11 ZZ irkES |BiuhyPaikE5 IBushyParitES Folly auarttr MS Folly Quarter MS Folly Ouartar MS ISIeneliHS IGIeneli HS IGIcndgHS Z9 321 341 36 IPultonES IFrftonES iFultonES ninondMS UmelOlnMS IReserrolrHS IFleservoirHS IRwenfBb-HS 49 16 Z4| Sl uS3 31 IS I 52 32 S3 i2 53 33 . iUmeMlnMS IS 11 16 19 10 15 17 10 M 17 U) 14 17 10 14 fTriaddphia Rid^fl ES |Triaii«lphlaRidrES ITriidalphiaBUgaES FallyQuartarMS MI/QuartK-MS TolIyQuartn-MS |GI«n«|jHS Mil MS |GI«nrigMS 17 15 15 IB U ZO 11 IS M U 20 U 1B 22 II IS [WutFnmdshlpES IWtstFrfendriilpES |W*stFriendship ES View MS iMountVIT MS IMnintVIew MS IMirriotts RidgeHS IMirriotts RidgeHS IMarriottsRidge HS 1B 14' 19 in ZO 11 14 20 11 15 21 IZ IS 2Z 12 IS |Wut Friendship E5 IWertFrfendshfpES IWcstFrtsndshlpES View MS IMountVtT MS IMountWT MS IMairtottsRldseHS IMairkrtts Ridge HS IMairiotts RldteeH5 as M as. 37 M SS 40 M 35 41 M SG 46 M 36 [WwtRritnrfiMpES IWtttFriMihhtpES IWtttfihndihlpES iMauntVtw MS IMDUirtVhw MS |MiiThitt>Rlilg«HS|M»irkitt»Rtite»HS iMiiitottiRldgiHS u 14 n 13 13 u 13 u |WestFriendship ES IWestFrfendihlpES |W«stFriendship ES IMauntVIew MS IMDuntVIewMS IMarriottsRidge HS IMarriottsRIdtBHS |MairtottsRidge HS [Wait FriendshipES IWtstFrfandthipES |Wtrt friendshipE5 :MflU View MS IMountMuw MS Mount Vtew MS |Mui1nteR[( 40 i3 OuduttilmaES iimrHHIiES HilliES . Waduct MS ThamaViB ducth . ViaductMS |Lani RaarfiHS |Lar(jRaarfi HS IHowart HS EnrBllnitotPrejtctleni WZ01B-I9 Enrehwrrt SehanlVwr I SihBd Ttir I School Ttir I Schul Year I School Yi Projected School Assipiments vsa-wn [ vai-wa | anzM CumntES iniB. aniEs wawwis CuinnlMS MUO.MUIIB TWviawMs CuinntHS BKO-ZdaiHi MCT-MW TWt chart sh( [iDl|earZOl8-19t profactwJBni ohnion. Tha flnroni |FonStRklgtE5 IRiHcnES |R)ltonE5 IFatiBBntValluyMS ItlmnKllnMS lUmeWlnhffi iRwenrolrHS ifrHS IRtawair HS IBryantWooiisES IBryantWasdiES iBiymtWwdiES IWIUeLakeMS IWihlaLakiMS IWIIdeLakeMS IWilitaLalnHS IWIIdtLateHS IWfUe Lake HS IBiBnmSpifngES IBtlknn Spring ES IBellowaSprtng ES |M«vfhldWaodiMS IMaiyfldd Woods MS |M*yflddWnDdlM5 ILong Reach HS ILcngRMchHS ILnrg Reach HS londES lOndES tanmndES indMS indMS iinondMS indHS lAtheltonHS lAtholton HS iNwthfitlilES INorthffiektES INartMtold ES iDimlagglnMS IDunlnuln MS iDuntagglnMS IWlldeLakeHS IWIIdtLiktHS |C«ntmnlil KS ItRidgaES iFultonES IFutton ES patutentVallayhM iLfimWn MS Itlme Klln MS indHS irrolrHS IReunnlrHS indES land ES IHatnnandES IHamnundMS indMS indMS indHS InthiKtimHS WUholtonMS idtlphii K\ilecES ITriadelphla Rldgt ES |Triailtlph[aR(dg«ESiMlyQuirterMS |Mly Quarter MS iFallyduarttrMS IGIenelte HS |srn«|j MS ISItnelgHS 34 10 * 33 1Z * rtfttwaiuES IVatetansES IVeteiansES IBIiuttMilltMS IDIlurtt Mills MS lEiiicoitMnitMS ICtntennlal H5 lOakfaidMnltHS [OakKndMllltHS 4B 16 16 56 18 17 INonhfleU E5 INarthffaU ES rTalliBttStirfngEES IDunlnuln MS iDunlogilnMS IWIIde Lake MS |WHd.l. ta HS IWIUt Lake HS IWIIde Laka HS IWatertooES IWatarian ES IWKwtooES iM^fltld Woods MS IBDnnlaBnndiMS IBonnle Branch MS lanlHS lid MS IHowantHS ITdhott Springs ES ICradterockES ICradlirackES lL*eElkhomMS ILakeElfchomMS iLataElkhom MS lOaklandMHIsHS IQaUaidMniiHS lOiklind Mills H5 IBinhyParitES iBuriiyParkES IBushyPaikES ;Glwnn>odMS IGInnroodMS lelanwoDd MS irfgHS IBlgHS IStorxlgHS ES lUsbnn lUsbonES lUibon ES ilWHUSOdMS iGlenwoodMS iwoad MS idgHS |GlenelgMS |Gtai»lgHS IBinhyParicES lUibcnES ILIsbonES GlcmroadhflS iGlnnrecdMS letenimod MS IBlgHS IGIendgHS ISfawlgHS IBushyPaikES IButhyPartES iBuihyPaikES Slenwood MS load MS IGIenwood MS IrigHS lelgHS iGlenelgHS |BiBliyParitE5 IBushyPariiES IBiBliy Park ES ilanwoBdMS telenwoodhffi lodMS irigHS idgHS IfflenelgHS |BiuhyParkE5 IBushyPaikES |BushyP»rt;ES ilenwoodMS ilenwcod MS iGlwwoDdMS IdgHS |Gl.n«lgHS iGltnelBH5 16 11 18 |BinhyP*rkES lUibonES lUsbon ES . toiWDadMS ileiiwoodMS iGlemimodMS [GlendgHS i«lgHS |GI«n«lgHS IPalntara Run ES |Pc(ntenRun ES IPdntBFS Run ES aataM lllt MS a»fcsiillleM5 Clartcsvllla MS iRlwrHniHS irHBIHS IRImrHillHS U 15 26 IS M Z6 15 27 15 » IS -.7 18 IS 26 IPalntenRunES IPnintui Run ES IPnhrteiiRunES QarkmnieMS OariwillBMS 'ClariBdlttMS lAthnltanHS lAUiolton HS lAthottonHS 55 30 65 33 ea 34 M 35 SB 3B « B7 42 45 lan Ch»»lng E5 in CrossingES [GfldfmanGraarin^ ES MurrayHI11M5 MuirafHniMS MurrayHill MS )[rHS tnnlrHS iRucivolrHS BO 29 37 S4 40 a is M » 6S 29 63 29 40 M W\awi Sprfng ES l&eap Run Q iDeepRunES MaffliIdWoniteMS MafflddWoodiMS MayttohIWsaiitMS I Long Reach HS [LongBaachHS ILong Raich MS 32 19 25 32 19 25 RocttumES iRockbumE5 :Rackbum ES Elkridg.Landing MS Elkridgc Landing MS ElkridgeLandiitjMS IHowardHS lid MS |HowaidHS 12 '. u * 13 * IS Elkridge ES iBkrfdpES . EIkrfdgaES Elkri(te Landing MS ThamuVbdurtMS Thomas Vladuct MS IHomidHS IKowairiHS IMIssIonRoadtllS ID * 10 . U) * 10 HrfiBrttrES llchuterES llchestarES Bannto Branch MS ElllmttMnisMS BliuttMllbMS IHowadHS [Oakland Milli HS lOaUandMnisHS 12 23 2S 11 . 22 M in ID la u 13 Z4 U 131 Northffeld ES NnrthflddES Uorthndd ES Dunhiggln MS OunhggtnMS BurteIghManarMS IWIIdcLduHS IWHdBLakaHS Idntwinial HS 4B M 31 4Z 31 29 45 31 -B 44 42 3B 29 461 ir Woods ES MinrWoodiES >rWoods E5 Burielgh Manor MS Buri.ighMinor MS Buifelgh Manor hflS riBtte Rfdga HS IMarriottsRIdBtHS IMairfotts Ridge HS ilOS «5 W 69 tl67 76 isa SB Zll 89 96 ZZ4 UB M21WmnrtyES WarartyES WawerfyES MnuntVlawMS Mount View M5 MountWtw MS IManfattiRIdteHS IWarrinnsRIdiKHS IMiirtotteRldBtHS 19 21 2B 56 27 34 53 M 69 29 34 73 K 361 irWoodiES MrnorWoods ES Manor Woods ES Mount ViM» MS Mount View MS Mount View MS IMirriotti Ridge H5 IManloteRIdgBHS |ManfatlsRldgt KS . ai w 22 34 ! 31 23 30 21 30 11 M » ZO 3Z| HollHteM Station ES. HellKttM Station ES Holimikl StirtlonES alapicsMS 'atapaaMS PatapscnMS IMttltbronHS |Mt UabinnHS IMtHeironHS 14 * 14 ' 13 . 13 * 10 13 11 HolinttUStation E5 HollffieUStaSonES HolimaU Statinn ES 'ataipiioMS 'atapimMS PatapanMS IMtHebronHS IMt Habrnn HS |MtH«bronHS 98 35 45 44 as 45 87 15 85 4- S1 B4 44 5SI VtUm»uES Werthiiiyton ES WorthlnttnnES DunlaggInMS EIIknttMllllMS ElllcottMCIlMS |MtH«bronHS IMtHtbron HS IMtHebmhHS 60 61 47 73 57 46 56 44 54 43 6B 56 4Z 671 Worthlngton ES NrfiBsttrES llchesttrES EllhnttMnisMS EllknttMilliMS ElllcnttMniiMS IhffiHtbronHS iMtHebronHS IQaUand Mills HS 0 0 Warthiiittiort ES WnrthlngUn ES WoiihlngtonES EiucottMniiMs EnkottMllltMS EllimttMnfiMS IMtHebtcnHS iMtHibmiiHS |OiM>ndMilliH5 311 112S 64 73 87 1113 7S 11IZ 7Z 96 10B 72 SB iio n 991 ThunderHill ES RunningBrook ES dunning Break ES ElltarttMills MS WIUe Lake MS WlldaLAaMS lid HS IWIIde Lake HS IWIIdaLaktHS 1001 10 15 17 TO BS 24 21 15 '5S 21 II 2i 32 27 26| foiwtRkfBeES ForestRklgeES )TtRiiia«ES 'rtiflUnt ValleyMS 'tihnuit Valley MS FatinuntVdlf. MS iRuemilrHS IRastrroirHS [Kamrfinnd MS 31 1002 S2 31 49 53 30 52 29 47| 51 30 47 51 32 4BI tauralWgodsES LiurelWoods ES Laurel Woods ES MuirayHlllhflS MurrayHill MS MuirayHniMS iiwirHS EivolrHS IRtsenulr MS 1003 IU/ 93 UO 106 [197 W. U5|197 106 123|194.U3 12S|19Z U7 1321Qflonafl Cratting ES laurel Woods K laurel Woods ES Muna/HIIIMS MinravHIIIMS MuinvHKIM5 IRuenmirHS iRwuimirHS llteunrolrHS 1004 55 31 30 3B S3 U 52 2B 391 52 27 40; 54 27 41 ForestRidgaES i X Ridge ES Forest Ridge ES 'atuient Valley MS 'atacuntVallayMS PatumntVilleyMS londHS |Hinin«)nd HS iMtntnn RoadK13 10C5 BO 3B 37 &, 61 36 a 36 so| 62 37 60i 62 33 601 irmm CroHingC Ganna. Croidni ES OussiiigES Muna/HIIIMS MwnyHIIIMS MumiyHniMS lAthalton HS lAthdtenHS [HammiMidKS 1006 37 15 21 27 39 11 39 21 ISI as 22 ai 38 23 301 irman CrossingES CrtnaFngES CmKlngES MumvHIIIMS MufrayHillMS MurrayHfll MS lAtholton H5 lAthaltonHS 1007 4S 2i 2a a [.St 30 SB 31 M 56 31 35 56 31 361 FutonES Fulton ES RlkunES HamnwndMS Llm«IOtnM5 UrtieKllnMS iRwrwirHS iRtMiTOlrHS IReiennlrHS 100B 15 * 15 17 * 15 14 16 14 U * 13 FultnnES iltonES Fulton ES Uma Kiln MS Uno WinMS LlmeKllnMS innlrHS snroirHS IRtStnrolrHS 1DQ9 17 15 U 10 ie 11 16 11 17 10 16 ii U| IrtdES iltunES FultonES )ndM5 Una Uta MS LlnitKllnMS iwoirHS IRUKiVDirHS lltuwwtrHS 1010 IU7 t2 » 123 1145 57 143 99 UBI 142 97 US lo 99 isa indES indES indES indMS icndMS indMS lAthulton HS lAtholton K5 lAtholton HS . 1011 16 14 15 23 30 Ifc 30 17 231 30 17 Ml a is 241 HamnundES HammnndES iBddES Hammond MS Hammnltd MS HammondMS lAthaltan HS lAtholtonKS IfttholtonMS 1012 46 30 45 16 45 26 3t I 44 26 3B| 44 27 SB il Woods ES LaunlWowllES Launl Woods E5 Murray Hill MS MunayHillMS MurrayHfll MS . niotrHS innlrHS IBaiBnmlrHS KU4 10 10 ' * u 10 AtholtcnES AtholtnnES AtholtcnES HanunoiidMS inndMS initMS IHimmond HS imondHS IHanumndHS ims SO 31 50 33 3B 49 31 40 indES indES indES indMS londMS indMS lond HS inond HS 1016 15 ' 11 15 ' 15 u 15 11 u AthottonES AthollonES AthdtonES MS IHannnnii HS 1017 62 Z9 39 42 62 41 60 42 47 61 41 SO 4Z 52 indES iullfoniES ilffcrdES indMS indMS lend HS IHammond HS U1B 89 32 49 U 86 Sl as sa s3 S7 5Z 57 53 61 indES 3ullftxdE5 GullfwdES Haramand MS > M»an ES MS Hi E5 IMSI HS IsiL MSIHS ESIM51HS auo-aaia wzyxowvs CumMMS zuzfr-aniMS CumntHS aHfraniiB aasKtts 1056 31 10 251 32 11 n is 2i ai u u 31 16 21 31 16 21 MhohDnE5 ftthotonES MholtDnES OaktandMinaMS Lake EIUum MS lake Elkhom MS lOaUaidMiUiHS lAtflQhDnHS lAthnltnnHS 1057 40 26 21 41 26 41 Z6 29 « ie n W SB 33 40 26 34 MholtonES MholtonES MholtonE5 indMS indMS iHammondHS Haiiiin&nd H5 IHammond HS 105S » 17 Z5! o zt 50 20 23 50 21 29 50 20 29 50 U 28 CniUinAES QwdhrBdtES CndlamdtES tlto BkhamMS lfl» ElkhaniMS LtlcHttnmMS lOaUwdhaiitfS IWhgltinHS lAthnltonHS 1059 17 13 16 10 Springs . FonitES StennsFonstES Oakland MfUi MS Oafctand Mills MS Oakland MllliMS lOaldandMfllsHS lOakland Mills HS lOakland Mills HS U160 48 37 S4] o za BfhiiHHIES ItffuiHIIIES ItfferaHIIIES lake BhbomMS MayflddWoodiMS MnflddWwdtMS lOiaUandMWsHS lOaklBiidMllliHS IMtnfon Road N13 loea Suwni Forast ES Stnmns Forest ES Stenni hirest ES Oakland Mills MS Oakland Milta MS Oakland Mills MS lOaUandWnisHS lOaklandMllltHS lOakUindMllliHS 1063 12 t3 21 11 * TalbattSprfngiES MbottSprfngiES nlbottSprfntsES Oakland Mills MS Oilitand Mills MS Oakland MHIsMS lOaUaidMIUiHS lOikland Mills HS lOaklandMllliHS 1064 27 U ID Z7 16 20 17 16 21 IS 15 21 ZB 15 22 29 15 22 'irinten Run E5 Claiksvillt E5 OarisvMeES QalsvllleMS QarkBillleMS OarfsunieMS lAtholton H5 Iftthohon MS IftthnltonHS 1DB M 23 171 23 18 Z4 22 17 Z4| ZZ 16 ZS Z2 16 2<| 32 15 24| TfiundwMINES PhtlpstudiES nrlptUKkES ElllnttMnisM5 MayflddWoods MS M^ffahtWpDdtMS iHnwinfHS IHowanlHS IHowadHS 1066 11 0 12 . 13 . . 13 * * 13 * . 13 * * in* Cnuiiti ES Swanrfitld ES Slinnllald ES WildiLdwMS L»k«Elkhmi MS LakeElkhomMS IWiUa Laka HS lAtheltonMS lAthotton MS 1067 125 73 961 UO M 99 117 S3 104|115 U 108|UO 81 Ul| UO 80 U2| ThundarHIIIES RunnIiigBranliES Running BraaltES BltultMfUiMS WIMaWttMS WildaltluMS iHminnlHS IWndaLalfKS IWIIdeLiktHS UBB 92 5S B2 SB 5Z 7G KB 50 771W7 K 77| IDE 5S 731 107 54 76 PhalpiLuck ES "halpsLuck E5 'hel|uLuckES Bnnnia Branch MS Bonnia Branch hfl5 Bcnnle Branch MS IHoward HS IHtnNinJ MS iHcwwd MS 1069 43 25 171 46 21 23 45 11 24 0 Zl 26 45 21 271 45 ZZ 271 FhilpsLuckES WatcrioaES WatertooES Bonnle Branch MS Bannte Branch MS Bonnle Branch MS ILong Reach MS I LongReach HS [LongRsachHS 107D SZ 39 22 S5 Bl 57 29 34 56 23 37 57 33 3BI 56 31 3B FhelpsLuckES Phtlps Luck E5 'htlp5 LuckE5 Bonnlfr Branch M5 Bonnle Branch MS Bonnle Branch IWB ILong Reach HS I Long Read) HS I LongReach HS W71 58 25 21; eo zg S3 30 ZB se » all S7 28 33\ S7 29 34| ftffanHBIES IrffaisHniES JafftisHMES MsfltU Woods MS MayfleMWooilsMS litofflaldWpsdaMS Itnng Reich HS [Long Reich H5 ILongRtachHS 1D73 50 1» 28; 47 25 26 146 25 271 45 15 291 42 24 Xl\ 44 24 31| WattHuES WauriaaES WtBftoaES M^fitU WdoifaMS BonnieBranch MS Bonnia Branch MS ILaigRuehHS iLnntflwrfiHS |LDngnt>chH5 1D74 a 0 WattriosES ThundarHnlES TliundarHHIES Baiuil* Bnnch MS OaklaniIMniiMS IHowardHS lOaktondMllliHS lOikklndMllltHS o o 0 Q ooo ,o«kr»dMiiitMS . 107S Itftss Hill ES 'helps Luck ES helps Luck ES Mavffekl Woods MS MayfleMWoods M5 MarfeldWoodtMS ILont Reach HS I Long Head) HS |LongRtachHS 1076 B 25 22 94 40 1DD 42 34 99 43 40 UM 43 C U» 4S -45 BellowsStiringES WatetfoaES WatEffooES MayfftU WoodsMS iBninle Branch MS Boiinte Branch Nts ILong Reach HS ILoi^ReachHS |LongR«achHS 1077 3Z 18 17 44 ZO S2 Zl 22 SB 2Z Z4 64 Z3 26 71 25 27| BtlloiiBStirtngES Btllowi SpringES Belkwi SpringES MayfteUWoods MS !htorfekl Woodi MS MiyfteldWmidsMS iLciig ReachMS [Long Ktich H5 I Long Reach H5 1079 42 22 261 d 24 |4S 24 Z6| 46 24 291 47 24 301 50 25 M| Daip Run ES D-p Sun ES D-p Run ES MayfhhlWmitaMS ilKiiyflddWfKtibMS htoylitldWoodtMS |Ling Rwch HS iLongRiBchH! I Long Reich H5 1080 31 15 27 31 16 as is u 36 1B 12 37 16 11 38 17 221 DeepRun ES Belloun Spring ES BeltowsSpring ES Maiyfftld Woadi MS IMiyffaUWoods MS MaytIaldWoodtMS ILongRsachHS IHDwaid HS I Howard HS 1081 SBS iu iui Z71 137 1Z81 ZB4 mf ua 291 1B 1501239 t3i 1571311 139 1631DtepRunES - OnpttunES OnpRunES MayftalilWBodihffi iMarfeUWooibMS ntoyf(«ld Woods MS ILong Reach MS IHowaidHS IHoimidHS 1063 D D 0 0 0 B 000 000 0 0 B 000 BallswtSpring ES RadibumES RocttumES TfiamaiViadiictMS . ViadurtMS Thomas Waduct MS iLangRwchHS iHominfHS IHowardHS 1083 B6 B9 12 B5 41 36 86 « 291 84 46 44 B7 47 48 SB « 501 RoctbumES BtlknnSprfngES BeltowsSpring ES Elirit|gelandii(ghtS IBonnle Branch MS Bonnfs Branch MS [LongReach HS |LongBaachHS |Ho»mniHS 1085 22 U Zl 28 15 23 26 14 23 Z7 IS 22 27 14 22 27 15 2Z! llchester ES BtllowsStiriniES Spring ES Boiuile Branch MS lie Branch MS Bonnte Branch MS IHoward HS I Howard MS IHouran) HS 10186 HS 15 121 ,-s * u 16 : Wl 16 w 16 10 16 u RaeMiumES BillcwnSprtngES Beltowa Sprf.lg ES EUridgtliltdllvMS IBnnnliBnnchMS Bonntt Branch MS IHawaid IHewariHS iHomrtHS 10B7 a io is 30 U IS 30 14 161 a is 17 30 1B IS M 16 IS RoctbumES Rockbum E5 RockbumES ElkrklgtLanding MS lElkritfgeLandli^MS Bkridte Landing MS IHowaid H5 IHowadHS IHawad HS ioaa 63 30 34 BO 34 59 H 4ZI 59 32 « 5S 3Z 44 S3 34 44 llchutu-ES BallinwSpring ES Btlknm Spring ES BoimteBranch ME iBminkBranch MS BonnleBranch MS iHBWidHS iHowacdHS ILongRtachHS UM9 72 37 Z4| 72 37 75 36 44 SB 37 47 1M 39 49 119 44 5B IkhBrtn-ES [IrfintarES llehBttarES Biiuite BranchMS IBnnnh Branch MS BDnnia Bfahch US IHaimrd HS IHoumlHS |lDngR«»chHS 1D90 30 ia| 17 1B 28 26 1G »| 26 15 27 Z7 15 16 Z7 15 Z6 NchntBTES lldintarES llchcrttrES Boiuite Branch MB IBIlcott Mills MS EltkottMnilMS IHowardHS lOaklandMllliHS lOaklandMlllaH; 1D91 31 16 ID 33 17 33 IS 19 S3 19 21 33 20 22 33 ZO 23 Rockbum ES DudiettsLaneE5 DuckettsLaneES Elkridge landing MS IBkridge Landing MS Skridga Landing MS iHciwaidHS IHnwaniMS IHowardHS 10» 44 IS 421 A3 29 42 Z3 39 U 2S 39 41 28 M 42 28 M WnrthaigtonES llchuttfES llchaxerES EUiorttMilliMS iBUeirttMIIDMS ;EBfeottMlllinflS IMtHabronHS lOaklandMllliHS lOaklandMllliHS 1C94 13 12 WorthlnitonES Piundn-HillES nunitarHBIES ElltarttMilliMS lOaUandMilltMS Oridand MIili MS IMtHabronHS lOakland Mlllt HS lOaklandMllltHS 1095 32 21 191 aa is 3D 17 31 17 31 16 25 32 17 M IkhauarES Waitriao ES Walirlon E5 Bonnlt Brartch MS IBoiuite Branch MS IBoiuite Branch MS IHowardHS [HowaidKS IHowmdHS 1096 K 26 33' Gl 33 59 33 56 M 53 34 44 H 34 TalbottSprings ES Thunder HIII E5 ThunderHill ES GaUaidMllliMS lOridandunisMS lOUUandMnis MS lOaklandMiita HS I OaklandMllliHS lOiUandMilliHS waa 45 3i 421 42 31 41 3.1 A' 29 W 29 W 39 » 44 WtUrionES TalbottSprings ES TllbottSpltllgsES Elllnnt Mills MS IWBdBlakehG IWJMtlakeMS IHomrdHS [WHdeLafceHS IWIIdfrLalttHS 1100 57 34 561 54 i8 51 W 52 S6 4B 37 5S 49 36 56 WatorioaES TdbottSprinisES Talbott5priiu5 E5 Elllartt Mills MS IWBde Late MS IWiUeLikeMS ICentannWHS IWHdaLaktHS IWIIdelakeHS 1101 a 17 s41 S3 S6 W S7 as S5 36 54 35 17 53 35 Veterans ES Vtteia. uES Veterans 65 idMllliMS iBBnrttMlllsWS lEllfcottMniiMS l&nfnntdHS Ifantmnbil HS [OikbindMllliHS 1102 53 21 33 SO 32 4B 33 47 32 57 i3 4Z 66 34 44 Veterans ES Veterans ES VetmnsES Elllmtt Mills MS lElltarttMllltMS lEllbitt MillsMS Idntannial HS ICintwinKil W IMtKehianHS 1103 38 3< 41 36 Z9 35 26 33 27 33 26 44 aa 2S « VataraniES VBtWBIUES VtwanaES EiiicattwnitMs lEnienttMilltMS lEllkainMilliMS ICantennMHS ICantmnlal H5 IhftHebronHS 1UW 13 13 18 15 10 17 15 * U 10 IS 10 15 22 10 15 Veterans ES Worthlntton ES Worthftigton ES Dunkiuln MS lEllkBttMllltMS lElllmttMnisMS |Mt HebronHS iMtHebronHS iMtHabronHS 1UB i3 10 361 M 17 32 W BI IS 31 16 26 3D 16 26 HollihektStation ES WorthlngtmES WoiiMngtnnES Ounkwfn MS lEllRBttMllliMS lEllkottMHIiMS iMtHthronHS iMtHtbmnMS |MrH»farnnH; 1106 73 44 49 71 24 73 27 74 30 76 31 40 75 i3 St Johns Lans ES VtteraiHES VatanisES DunkiggtnMS lOunlagglnMS IDunlagpnMS I Ml Habron HS ICantnlnlal HS lCantonnial HS UD7 M IQ i?| M 16 27 17 17 17 M l-r 20 26 . -7 20 HoDittolit Station ES HollfftetdaatkinES Holimdd Station ES PvtapscoMS IPatajismMS IFatapscoMS iMtHtbm. iHS iMtHtliranW |C«irtuinl«lHS 110B 15 . 15 * 14 13 14 13 HotKftelitStaUonES HollinddStatkinES HolimddHaUonES PatapscoMS IFatapico MS IPatapscaMS |Mt Htbron HS |MtH»brtinHS iMtHabmiHS 1109 17 li Z6 U 12 30 ^ iHoimieldStrtlonES HolllffeUSurttanES HolllflridSttdanES iPfpienMS IPnqucaMS IPBtapnoMS IMtHebronHS IMtHelironHS IMtHebronHS 1110. 77 35 79 36 45 78 37 45 IStmmni Fcnrt ES Stayana forttrt ES Stwns Fnrast ES [Oakland Mills MS lOatland Mills M5 lOakland Mills MS [OaklandMlllsHS lOddandMills HS |OaMindMnisHS Ull o o IIhundwHIII ES RunningBrook ES RunningBrookES |Dunloa(lnMS IWIIdeLakeMS IWIIdiLdaMS IWIldeLaktHS IWlUelaltBBS' IWIUataktHS 111Z 43 M 16 72 2B BB 31 UH 36 U2 40 40 1U) 43 42 IFulton ES FutonES FultonES lUmeKnnMS lllmaKllnMS lUraaKilnMS IR-rvdrHS IRaumiirHS IRaannirHS 1113 22 17 23 14 U 24 U 25 U 25 n 20 25 U BtemnshinstES Stmrniu Fartrt ES Sttniu fMtst ES |0» EnrnllnwntPra|9Cltoa> CT1BU.U Eimllmirt SrfiDBlYair School Year I SchonlYtir I School Yur I SthBdYi Projected School Assignments znzo-zozi 2011-2022 I Z02Z.1D23 I 2013. 1024 I 10Z4-20IS CumirtES autt-aniB ZBBwniB CunnntNIS aniMBaws anwBMiw CumntHS aicw-niaHs S09-MHS Thn chirt showsthe offfclalschool ytaraift-IStnFDlment, and U5Z DfoiBctm? . nrullment for each nolreon. Tha . nrollmaaits are Bmented 26 U 26 13 27 13 15 27 13 37 U 16 W 13 iNorthftok)ES iNnrthflddES INortfideld ES IDuntoggtoMS :DunlDg^n MS IDuntaggfriMS IWIWtLakeHS IWndetakeHS |C»nwnnlalKS 1153 21 12 25 21 13 22 14 ZO 22 U 22 13 21 22 14 |Narthfi«lriES iNorthfletdES ICenunnM Lan* ES iBuriilghManor MS BuriBtih Manor MS IBurtelgh Manor MS ICtntannial HS ICtntmnlal HS [Canhnnial MS 15 15 U54 t5 U 16 11 16 16 U 16 Ul 16 16 ID INorthOelitES iNnrtWfU ES iNorthfMd S iBurieIghManor M5 'BuriitghManarMS iBurtalahManor N15 ICentannlil HS IMarrirttl RUne H5 [Manfotti RktgeHS 1155 irthfteld ES INoittlfleM ES INnrthfidd ES 'Dunloggtn M5 Dunk>tglnM5 IDunlogglnMS ICanfnnlal HS ICentennlal HS IC^nfnnlal MS use S7 U 32i 26 IS Z6 15 Z4 27 15 16 14 24 27 14 ICtirtmnlil Lane ES ICentennialtaiwES ICanhnnW l«n* £S . BurledhManor MS Burietgh Manor MS IBurialghManor MS |C»nt»nnl>lHS ICHitanntai HS lonmnriHS 1157 30 17 30 2B IS 27 IB IS ZS 17 25 16 27 23 16 ir Woods ES w WoodsES ir Woods ES Burielgh Manor MS BurhlghManor MS 'Buritlgh Manor MS |MarriottsRldga HS IMinlcttarodgtHS IMarrlotU Wdge HS 1159 S2 2B 3S| 53 ZO 53 23 30 54 25 56 16 M 57 27 ISt Joluii Lane ES ISt Johns Lane ES IStjBliiu LamES . PatnpscoMS PatapscoMS IPflt^uuMS iMtHrtronHS IMIHtbranHS iMtHabrunHS 1160 |WawerivE5 IStJohnilaniES IStJohiuLine ES PatapscoM5 PatapaoMS PatapuaMS iMtHebronHS IMtHabronHS iMtHtbronHS 1161 7Z ^ S5 74 29 M B 45 7S 3S 77 B7 45 TB sa IStJnhniLuieES ISt JohiB Lane ES IStJohu Lina ES ;P»t«[ncnMS PrtapicoMS ;Patap5coM5 IhftHriiranHS IMIHabronHS iMtHiibmnHS 1162 W 16 29 43 23 41 24 28 40 24 39 Z4 29 41 Z4 IWawrtyES IStJnhniLantES Bt Johns Lane ES Patapsco MS PatapacoMS PatapK oMS IMtHebronHS iMtHtbronHS IMtHabronHS lies 291 1Z 12 11 11 16 11 2Z 11 II 11 U 23 is 10 [WamrtyES artyES [WmrfyES Mount View MS MnuntViewMS MountView MS IMairiotts Rid^ MS IMirriBttiRtdgaHS IMarriotti RidgeMS 1164 13 22 13 2S 14 261 21 M 14 21 24 13 22 22 13 ir Woods E5 inr Wands ES irWeodiES Burtelgh Manor MS Burtelgh Manor MS BurltlghMaiwrMS IManfotts Rklge HS IMarriotURIdgaHS IMiiihrtts Ridge HS U65 20 14 1Z 19 13 20 13 20 14 U 19 M U 13 1B [WamrtyES BrtyES [WaverlyES WBWMS MountVltt» MS MnuntVtewMS [hfXTfdttI RidBi HS IMiirfDttiRIdgeHS iMarffetttRIdgtHS 1166 |W»mrtvES ilf^ES iri/ES ViewMS MountView MS Mount VInuhB iMmiottsRklBeHS IMairtotts Ridge HS iMarriottsRidseHS 1168 4Z 28 39 39 » M 26 40 36 26 36 25 40 34 Z5 ifWoadiES iMinwWoBdsES IManor Woods ES MnuntVhwMS Biflfttgh Manor M5 iManfomaBfdgtHS|M«irtotti Ridge HS |MaiTiottsRlilg»HS U69 S3 33 33 17 21 Sl i9 W 31 20 31 20 30 30 20 IWanrtyES IWanmrtyES irises ViawMS itVKwMS MountVTew MS IManlottsHfdgaHSIMan-lottoRlilBtHS |MairiottsRidge HS U70 36 38 35 35 26 M 2G 43 31 25 31 24 4Z 29 M ir Woods ES iwWandtES :MaiDTWoodiES View MS MnuntVitwMS MountWT MS IManlottsRidteHS |MarriBtttR[i|giHS IMaiTtottiRldgtHS 1171 26 10 44 14 13 57 U 69 21 1B BO IS [TrfadBiphlBRiitgt E5 ior Woods ES irWBndtES BuritlghMiner MS Buriateh Manor MS BurttlghtAanorMS nntBRIdgiHS IMarrtottimdieHS IMairiatURlilgi HS 1173 16 16 16 16 BuransltBldES ISwanrfWdES SminfleldES HirptisCtiafuMS HwiwrtOKilctMS HarpereChoteE MS IWIkteLikeHS |WI(d*L«lnHS IWItdelaktHS U79 w is a 24 16 23 ttmlst line ES ICBnttnnlallurES Curtinnlil Lane ES Burielgh Manor MS BuritfghManor MS BurtolghManor MS ICentennlal HS [Centannial HS ICtntennlal H5 . U74 ftmnifltldES ISmnsfltldES SinrunaldES H«n-F* Chain MS Harpars Choice MS HarpersChoice hflS IWIWtltkiHS [WndeLakeHS lwnd*Lik«HS U75 LongteltowES iLailtfllawES igfdlow E5 H»persCholuMS HaipmChoiuMS HarpcisChotcsMS IWfUe Lake HS IWildaLalcHS FWHdeLafceHS 117G aartafllleES |TMaitelpli[aR[(li>ESTritdtlphr RidgeES Folhf QuartET MS FallyauartwMS Fully Ouarhr MS |Wm Mill MS HRIHS [RlwrHniHS 1177 LongfttlbwES ILangfellaw R Lontfdlow ES 1B Chain MS H.rpniOiokaMS Harptn Choice MS IWBde Lake HS IWild. UiteHS IWIIdeLateHS 117B WMt FriendshipES |THaiielph[aRIilgtES TriadtlphhRldlBeES Mount Wew MS illyBuartefMS Enllyau«ir»«rMS IMairtotti Ridge HS IRlverHnlHS iRlnrHHIHS Wtrt friendship E5 rrriaiielphlaRldgtES Triaihlphi. Rldg«ES Mount Vftw MS lily Quarter MS Fcllf Quarfr MS IMiinfottiRldlBeHS |GleneltH5 iGtantlgHS iiso Tnidriphr RUf ES iTriaitolphlaRtdlgeESTiladelphlaRldga ES Fo*y Ouutmr MS Folly ttlirtn-MS Folly Quarter MS IRhnrHniHS |G)>n Mnan ES |MS| HS ES|MS|H5 ESIMSIHi ESI MSIH! ES|MS|HS CurnntB znawoaiES aiu. aawB CurnntMS zua-aeiMS 2B»^IB«WE CumntHS wsa-jaaim M»»H( Thb chart sh( the offlctoitthDOI ytar UIB-19 eniBllinint, i orolected eni Imantfor uach pDlvnDn^Thc cnrollmtntt ar& UK iFultonES IFUttdltES iFultnnES lUme KBn M5 lUmaKIInMS |Um*KilnMS IRctrvolrHS |R«i isoa 47 15 il 46 22 M 45 2i U 0 Z3 25 » 23 Z7 IHnllinddStattoflES IWartWngtonES IWorttilngton ES [DunlBgglnMS |ElllcnttMnisM5 lailcottMlllsMS [MtHriiianHS IMtHrironHS [MtHebmnHS 1303 501 79 60 76 S3 66 73 5Z 67 72 50 68 72 50 67 7G 49 68 IWorthlngtnn ES IWorthlniton ES IWDrthington ES lElllcottMIIIlMS :llimttMniiMS lEIIInrttMllliMS IMtHebronHS IMtHthiunHS lOiUand Mills HS 10 11 12 uu> * * 19 10 i 19 11 10 is ii u is u M 11 [Warthlngton ES IIhundarHIIIES ITIiundtrHniES lElltcnttMllbMS laaMaid hfitb MS lOddandMniiMS |MtH«bronHS lOddind Mills HS lOiklaiid Mllli HS 2002 S7 zg ss| 56 33 A7 57 32 46 56 32 47 55 33 47 S5 34 47 ILauralWooitsES ILaurelWnndiES ILaurriWoodsES I MurrayHHI MS [MurrayHill MS I Murray Hill MS ilrHS inmtrHS ilrHS zoos |1SO 52 IBO|149 76 9» |153 77 39 154 77 101 151 m 107 150 84 109|Gann«n CrBsring E5 IGonnan Cradng ES IGomun CruMlng ES |Muir*yHntM5 IMumvHlllnu IhtunayHIUMS lAtholton HB- [AtfioltnnHS imondHS 2010 indES IHammond ES iinondMS indMS imond MS lAthBltonHS lAtholton MS lAthoton HS aui 16 16 Z41 16 12 16 11 21 15 t2 21 16 U 21 15 il 10 IHamniond ES iHaimmndES indMS IHunnundMS imondMS Iftlholton HS - lAttlotonHS IWholtonHB 201Z as 7! TO 42 71 41 51 71 40 53 41 54 llaurelWoodsES Gomian Oossfng ES IMuirayHHIMS IMuinyHIIIMS iMunrgyHnfMS imlrHS ilrHS . mlrHS 2022 18 * IBnllnnnBriifae ES [BcUman BrUne ES |Ballm«nBridg* ES IPahmentValley MS |PatuientValley MS |PatinuntVan*vMS IHimnnni HS indHS iMtBlanBnidBlS 2023 17 * |BollmanBridga ES iMlmm BridgeES IBollman Bridga ES |PrtuimntV»ll*yMS IFatunnt Valley MS IPatuiitmVdleyMS fanmndHS imond HS IMIsslnnnaad#13 I02S 17 as | IS 11 26 15 10 15 u lOarisrfUeES lOartsulllaES laiitmllto ES laarknlllehflS |H»rp*fi Oioic* MS |H»p(nCho(ceMS IHtmrHIII HS iRIwHlllhB iRherHIIIH5 ZOM M 32 64 37 61 37 43 60 34 45 5S 34 47 56 33 4S nnisEs IHananrHmiES iHanowr HillsES IThomasWaductMS [ThDmaiVladurtMS iThomuVlaductMS indHS iHammgndHS IMIsslonRoadlUS 2034 44 66| ffl 33 53 84 40 50 86 W 51 8J 46 5Z 87 4C 54 Bt Johns Lane ES 1st Johns LAW ES IStJnhnsLutES 'ari sen MS IDunlDgginMS lOuittaggln MS IMtHtbronHS iMtHebmnHS iMtHabnmHS 1035 Z7 Z9 AS V 46 27 St 45 Z5 33 52 25 34 60 23 3S HIlls E5 IHanonrffifltES |Hminr«rKllltE5 IThomasWaductMS rihninaiVIaductMS iThonaiVlBdurtMS ing Reach HS iLongRtachHS IMlHlonRoadWS 30SJ 0 D ODD ooo 0 D 0 ooo IDuclntfslaneES IDudtottsLmaES |Dud)ttt«llneE5 IThomKVfaductMS |Blbidg»t*iidh>tMS lElkffdf LandingMS angRmhHS [LongReach HS iLangRnuhHE 2038 AS 31 411 52 27 51 2B 41 49 19 41 49 3D 41 50 30 41 !Elkridg8£S lElkridgt ES |Elkridg*ES lElkrklBELindlniMS rrhomasVlaductMS IThomasVtoductMS limaid HS lid HS liDnRgaiifflS 2040 42 36 461 42 2B 45 42 27 44 41 ZB 44 40 29 4B 41 IS « iBkridgaES lElkridgiES IBkrMgtES iBkrid^LandrngMS IBkrtdteLandiniMS lElkrfilgeLanding MS IniurdKS IHowiidHS IMIUiOilRllBIfdlS 2041 |Bkridg«ES lElkridgtES lElkridgeES lElkridg.Landing MS iBkridgeLBndinsMSlElkrldge Landing MS fowaid HS iHowgnlHS IMIsslon Road ffl3 ..2042 Z3 U 14 29 U M IS ?B 13 It. Z8 15 ^9 IE 15 IS IBkrMteES |Elkrld»*ES |Btrtdg«£S |ElkridgaLand[ivMS|EIIirti|g*L«iulin«MSlElkriitgabmiBiigMS fowaidHS IfdHS IMIsuiaiflaadKia 2043 BS 4< 47 34 S4| 41 S9 42 n 4i si S3 42 52 92 42 S3 IDuctettslaneES IDuckettsLantES iDudattslaniES ITliomasWaductMS IBkridjBLandliijMS lEltolifgaLindingMS ing Reach H5 |LoogReach HS ins Rnch HS 2046 V. W\ 29 17 Z3 29 -[6 13 2B 15 2B is is 23 2S 15 13 IFofucKdBtES IForest RTdgsES IRontt Bidg* Ei IPrtunnt Valley MS IPaucantValley MS IPatuiB.rtValltyMS IRuanlrtrKS IRisamirHS IHanimond MS 2047 54 ZO B8 51 26 51 25 32 51 25 33 53 Z4 34 56 Z4 35 IftimstfUdgaES IFonrtRidlseES IForertBdttES |PatuwntVall»vMS IPatumnt Valley MS |P>tu»ent Valley MS land HS IHainmond HS land HS »u 0 0 u QUO IGuilflxdES IGuilfdrdES |Gullf Folygon ilMSIHS ilMSII ilhASII CumntES sas-wsies CumntMS 2flao. wa. Ms wwwww CurmntHS ana-Muws WWMW Thlidiartshi OBlvM rmiB-Uenrolli JaL Diolecttd cni olwon. The enrollments 2139 16 16 17 16 Ifi 1B |Cr»dlarockH ICradkrack ES ICradltrartES ILake Elkhom MS llake Bkhani MS iLafcaElkhomMS lOtktondMllliHS IddJandMilliHS |OaklandMni8HS 2143 45 17 401 47 22 2B 4s zz 2a SO 11 26 Sl Zl 28 SO 72 W ILontfeffowES ILai^TallDWES iLongftllawES IHarpenCholuMS IHarpeisChoIuMS |HaipenOiok»MS |Wildi L*to MS IWttdeLake HS IWfUe Laka HS 2145 B7 45 61 B8 4t B8 89 44 66 M 47 641I ua 47 K| IIOB 48 63 IRunnhig Braok E5 IRunnlng Brook E5 IRunnfrtg Braolt ES IWikfaKki MS IWIktebikBMS IWHdBLateMS IWIIdaLtkeHS IwndtUktHS IWUdelaktHS 2U6 44 20 29 46 Zl 32 48 21 M A9 Zl M 55 21 30 57 22 19 iihgBmokES rr»lbirtt Springs E5 ITalbottSprfngsES IWIUa Lake MS IWiUtLakaMS |WIIdtL*k« MS IWIIdcLake HS IwndetakeHS IwndBiafctKS 2M7 70 63 68 SO 89 67 48 861 73 47 B5 73 « S3 74 46 82 ICuiwnnM lan* ES |Cent»nnnbim ES ICcntennlalLaieES |Burla|(hManor MS |Burta|ghMiner MS iBuriXghMiinarMS ICentennfal H5 ICentmnlal H5 ICtntmnlil HS 214B M 10 as IB 12 as IE ui 36 17 161 35 17 171 36 17 17 INorthfldd ES INorthffeU E5 iTalbattSprinpES IDunloggin MS lOunlouln MS IWIIde Lake MS |Wilita Lakt HS IWndelaktHS IWHdelakaHS 2'150 33 M 25 B* 20 29 34 19 »I 35 19 M| M 19 29| 34 19 30 iNnrthflddES INorthftaklES iNwtMitld ES iDunlnuln MS IDunlngghi hAS IDunlogtfnM5 ICNlwnnWHS ICentennlal H5 ICentennlal HS 2151 000 000 000 0 0 o o a 000 |ThunderHniE5 rrdbottSpriiigiES iTalbattSpringiES lOaUandMIUsMS lOaUandWth MS lOakland Mills MS lOaklandMilliHS lOdklandwnisHS IDaMandMnisHS 2154 S3 64 SB I BS 57 enel(HS IStniigHS 21S4 |l06 69 77| 105 67 90 102 <6 911103 65 541MB 63 9S 104 63 95 ICcntennlalLanBES iCtntannWLairES ICentmnlal Lane ES IBuridgh Manor MS IBurtrith Manor MS |Buria|(hManor MS ICantwniil MS ittnnld HS ICentannM HS 21B9 ;RunE5 IDayton Oaks ES IDayton Oak* ES laarimfflBMS IClBrisvdteMS laaiknllle MS IRhnrHBHS iRiwrHIIIHE llUmHIIIHS 2191 45 15 33 43 24 35 42 2i 3S 40 23 39 13 38 22 35 IVrteransES Vetei SES IVtteransES iDunlogiinMS lOunlogslnMS IDunldggln MS ICentennlal HS ICtntannM MS IMtHebronHS 213E U Z6| Z3 14 2B 23 14 Z71 2i 15 25 M 15 26 25 :t5 15 |D«yt«n Otki Ei TrtaddphlaRldp ES rmaitelphlaRldf ES |Lfm«H(nMS IhllyQutarMS IFaKfQuaittrMS iRhnrHMtfS IWwHIIIHS |fUwHIIIH5 2304 IBryartWoadiES BrfantWmdiES IBryant Woods ES IWIUaLakatAS IWHdaLiktMS |WfUebikt MS IWHdeLikeHS IWikleLAeHS |Wild«LiteHS IZ05 47 22 M| 3D93 IWBfthingtcnES NrfiBSlarES llldimterES . Elllntt Mills MS ElllcottMnisMS Elllntt Mills MS IMtHebicnHS IDahland Mills HS lOaUandMilllHS 3UU IVtteransES VettransES IVauraniES ElltuttMiBiMS ElliwltMniaMS BltuttMiBiMS ICnrttiultd HS [CentennialHS [Oakland MllliHS 3U)7 116Z 70 7B 163 97 99 158 » 10711153 U» lt21 1149 U» U51 I Mi 9B 119 IHolliHridStaUonES HolllflaU Stittan ES HdltfttU StottanES PatipscoMS PatapscoMS PatapscoMS IMtHebronHS IMtHabranHS l^ntannW HS 3U3 3B U Ml Sg IE 24 3t 17 Z4| 39 17 151 <0 18 M| 40 U M| IStnvuis Rnut ES SttwnsFointES Stewnt forait ES Oakland Mill* MS oiUandwaiiMS OaklandMllte MS lOiaUandMUhMS [OaklandMllliHS lOaUand Mills H5 3115 IPohfraRunES ifra SunES Polntars Run E5 UmeKllnMS aarknllle MS a»fsvllleMS inralrHS IRhrrHniHS iRhrrHIIIHS 3131 16 17 21 r 22 2i * * lansCraning ES ina erasing ES aumw CniBing ES WllihLakaMS Lain ElkhomMS take Elkhom MS lAthdton HS IIUhotonHS lAthohnn HS 3133 33 15 52 as ifne BrookES ins Chisslng E5 aemeniCrosslniES WllriaLakeMS Lake Elkhorn M5 Laka Bkhorn MS lAthalton HS lAtholton MS lAthatton HS 3136 54 U ZZ| 57 25 30 SB Z6 32 S3 27 3Z G9 2B 34 74 19 B4 |Runn[i^Brook ES Talban Spring* ES TalbottSprtngiES WllitaLdnMS WiUe LakaUB WllitoLikBM5 IWBde Lake HS IWIIdeldfceHS IWIIdelakeHS 3137 53 M 32 57 28 41 59 28 39 60 ;3 381 61 29 391 61 30 38 IBryant Woods ES Bfyant Woods ES BrvantWoodtES Wild* Laka MS WiUa Lakt MS WIUtLtluMS IWiUa Laki HS IWilda Lric HS IWIIdt Like HS 31S8 36 U IS I 35 16 M 34 16 15 34 15 M 15 17 34 13 171Buianiffald ES StnnifhldES SininfleMES Harpars Choice MS Harptn ChoiceMS Haiptis Choice MS IWIIdeLaktHS IWIIdeLakeHS IWIMalakBHS 3139 2S 14 36 2t 14 27 29 12 261 29 13 25; 19 11 23 29 13 22 ICradteroch ES CradlerocltES Cradl»rackES L»k«Elkharn MS LA* Elkhom MS Lite ElkhornMS |Odd»ndMniiHS lOiklandMills MS lOaldmd Mills HS 3143 85 42 BS 91 42 37 95 45 411 97 43 W 42 47||101 4Z 47|iLongftllowES Longfellow E5 Lantfdlow ES HarpanCholu MS HafpanOioluMS HarpanChalu MS IWKdalakaHS IWIItoUilwHS IWIkltLahaHS 3M6 45 13 ZS 47 20 Z7 46 21 27 50 21 Z71 54 22 27 57 23 27i RunningBreak ES Ruhrting Brtiolt ES RunningBmokES WIUe Lake ^t5 WMe Lafct h4S WIUeLake MS IwndeLakeHS IWildelakeHS IWiUa Laka HS 3147 D ICantmnlBl tine ES CentHinlal Lane ES Centennial lane ES BuriefgliManefMS BuritV ManorMS Burisijh ManorMS ICanunnlal MS ICmfnnW HS IC»nt«nnlil HS 3150 51 43 631 SZ 29 58 54 Zfl 55 53 ZB S3 53 28 51 55 2B 51 iNorflfiakl ES Narthfialii ES NorthfhMES OunldBBl" MS Dunlnggln MS Dunloggln MS Idntennlal HS ICenttnnlal HS ICentennial HS 3169 U U 29 16 11 14 i6 ii a l U 11 211 is u zi| 15 U 201iWinriyES WweilyES WanriyES Mount View MS MnuntVtewMS Mount Vlmif MS |liA»rn'atu Rirfg* MS iMttiDtttRtdgtHS IMiirtotteRtdgaHS 'Swansfldd ES Swnifcld ES SwniHtld ES Harptn Choice MS Hiipera Choice MS Harpen Choice MS IwndeLaktHS IWildeLakeHS IWfUa Laka HS 3176 38 » S3 37 27 S3| 36 2B AS 36 25 4B I 35 25 461 TrfadetphlaRlilge E5 TriailalphlaRldf ES Triaittlphr RidgtES FcOif ttinrtT MS FsUyQifterMS Folly Quarter MS iRhnrHBlHS |RtwHIIIH5 IRImrHIIIKS 318Z 23 13 21 22 13 22 22 12 20 20 12 211 20 12 20| Triaddphla Ridge ES Trlidelphla Ridge R TriadelphlaRidge ES Folly Quaifr MS Folly Quarttr MS FcllyQuarurMS HfllHS 31«n«l8HS lelinele H5 EnnMUntnt Pn>]«rttoiu SVWU.M EnnAnant SchoolVur |SdieD Polyfon y. ES|MS|HS| ES|MS|HS| IssL CumntES auo^naiB acMBua CummMS anfrzaaws imu-TOtMs CumntHS ZOZB-MttlHS WttMttB This chart shows the official schaol yM r»lB-l9 enrollment, and DFDlecled enrollinentfar *ach BDhnmn. The enrollmenB ara Bminttd 3191 2B 16 26| 27 U M Z6 M 23 25 13 23 Z4 13 131 24 13 IVateraiuES IVeteransES IVWfaniES |Duntagg[nMS IBuntouhiMS |DunlogglnMS ICenunnltl HS ICntemlal HS iMtHrtmnHS 3213 T3\ 17 29 28 17 28 32 17 28 V 20 29 M 17 30 3i 17 |WtrtFri«ndshlpES |WestFriendship ES IWutFriandihlpES iMcuntVlewMS tnt View MS IMountViewMS IMam-nthRlrigt HS |MiiilottsR[dieH5 IManfottt Ride MS 32Z6 FWutRftltdihlpES |WutFriHi(lshlpE5 IWestFricndsliIpES IMnuntVlawMS iMDuntVlwMS iMountVlnirMS IMaiTtoteRlilgaHS|M«nriottiR[dliBHS IMarriotts Ridge KS 322B IWertFriendihipES IWutFriwiriihlpES |Wot FriendshipE5 IMountVlewMS intVlawMS iMountVnwMS IMarriotts Ridge HS IMarrkitttRlilgaHS IMarriotts Ridge M 3238 ihfPaikES IBiuhyPartES iBiuhvParkES IGtenwood MS )dMS IGIainmnd MS ilmetgHS i\tHS |GI«n1gHS 3247 iLhhon ES ILtsbon ES lUshon ES |GI«nwnodMS lodMS IGIenmod MS ;l«n«lgHS |Gleni|BHS [GlenrigHS 3Z48 iLtabonES lUibonES lUibon ES IGItnwand MS )dMS IGIuiwoDd MS [GlenrigHS iGlaneli HS [SlentlgHS 3250 ILlahon ES lUibon ES lUibonES IGIanuuad MS iadMS [Glenwood M5 [GlenrigHS KtlgHS IGIcndgHS «B5 ;ES iHanamrHilliES iHinomrHllls ES IThomasVtoductMS :VfailurtMS iTIininatVIiductMS [Long Reich HS |LongReach HS IHinrtrd HS 4041 17 20 la 14 17 13 16 13 IB u 17 12iBtrMge ES IBkridgeES |Blafdg«ES lEIWdgt Landing MS lElkridgt Landing MS I BkrMgaLanding MS iHiward MS laid H5 IMinnn Road K13 W41 |Elkrtd^ES iBkrfdgeES lEUirfdteES |Elkridg» Iflnrflng MS |ElkriifB«Landing MS [DkridgelandlruMS [Howard HS rid MS IMIalon Read KU 41M7 43 19 22 45 19 33 46 1» Z4 45 19 241 47 U »7 U Z6 in Bridge ES IBBllinanBridgBES IBollman Bridge ES IPatunnt Valley MS IPauucent Valley MS IPatiBirtVBllayMS wnd HS H*ininond H5 4069 46 25 2» I 48 Z6 Z6 49 25 Z81 49 25 M 50 15 31 IB 27 32 |Pb«lp*LuckES IWattrinoES IWattrfonES IBonni* Bnnsh MS IBannla Branch MS IBonnte Branch MS |L)ngR*achHS ILai^RuchHS llong Reach HS 40iS7 61 30 49i SB M 46 70 36 471 69 » 4S 70 41 49 i9 42 51 IRockburn ES iRocktiumES IRockbum ES |ElkridgBLanding MS lElltridf LandingMS IBkridgE Landing MS I Howard HS irdHS IHowardHS 4093 » 17 Z4] Z7 U Z3 Z7 18 M 27 IS 24 27 IS 24 2B M 24 IWnrthhigton ES illdiestcrES IIIChuurES iBBarttMllliMS lEmmtt Mills M5 IEII[OBttMfllaMS iMtHtbmnHS IQddand Mills HS lOiklandMilltKS 4113 15 16 IS 16 17 |Stt<*n>FomstES (Steniu Forest ES IStcvens Forest ES lOafdandMniaMS lOaUmdMniiMS I Oakland Mills MS lOakland Milli HS |0»kl»ndMills H5 lOakland Mills HS 41S1 t8 11 30 t2 32 12 21 u| 311 121 a 13 Crossing ES [OflmBfuCfoatrtg ES |U«nwn» Crossing ES PMWtlakeMS ILakeHkhomhflS ILakiBkhnmMS lAUiolton HS lAtholton HS IftUiDltcnHS 4133 |Biyant WaoA ES IQcmens Crosring E5 ICIemensCrossing ES IWBda Lain MS lUito ElkhamMS I Like Bkhom MS lAtholtnn HS lAthnlton HS lAtholton HS 4136 |Runn[i I am writing as a concerned resident who voted for you In our last election. Many of the reasons I chose to support you were directly related to your stance on future redistricting in Howard County. I have two children in high school that will be potentially impacted by redistricting, so this was a huge factor for me in voting for any future BOE member. A direct quote from you from a video posted on your campaign website: The most effective, least disruptive, way to address overcrowding is to build more schools. Now that a site has been chosen for high school #13, let's expedite the selection of a site in Elkridge for high school #14 and get serious about building both schools as soon as possible. Marriott's Ridge was built in 18 months so we know what's possible if the will exists. I'd want to blend the building of new schools with strategic redistricting that addresses current overcrowding while anticipating future growth. Any redistricting should be done in the most targeted and limited way possible to minimize disruption to students. I'd start with drawing the lines for HS #13, and then focus the more immediate redistricting on areas not slated to be moved to the new school, to ensure that the same neighborhoods are not moved twice. I would also have the redistricting apply beginning with the rising 9th graders, who will already be at a natural transition point, rather than disrupting kids already settled in their high schools The ideas above noted, we do not have enough data to make an informed decision about an appropriate plan of action. Community input is critical but it must be supplemented with data to back up any decisions we make. Lastly, I'd encourage the Board to learn about efforts that have worked in other parts of the country to address overcrowding, as this problem is not unique to Howard County. For example, we might consider developing specialized academies in schools with excess capacity-e. g., around STEM, the arts, or coding-to draw interested students from overcrowded schools." It's both extremely concerning and disappointing that the ideas you championed while working to acquire your voting base are now in direct conflict with the proposed redistricting plan. As your constituent, I feel blindsided by your shift in attitude and stance on issues you clearly voiced, and which played a large role in your election win. I hope you will consider that I, along with many other voters, believed you and took you at your word that these ideals are not only ones you supported then, but would continue to fight for once elected. Sincerely, Elizabeth Cotvin, Polygon #3176 Dear Board of Education, Now that the public testimony portion of the boundary review process is complete, and we're in the midst of your difficult work sessions, I'd like to share some well-written thoughts on redistricting that you might recognize. This writer emphasizes focusing on using targeted redistricting to address overcrowding with minimal disruption, drawing from community input and accurate data, plus consideration of alternative, specialized programs that have succeeded elsewhere, Here's a direct quote (emphasis added): The most effective, least disruptive, way to address overcrowding is to build more schools. Now that a site has been chosen for high school #13, let's expedite the selection of a site in Elkridge for high school #14 and get serious about building both schools as soon as possible. Marriott's Ridge was built in 18 months so we know what's possible if the will exists. I'd want to blend the building of new schools with strategic redistricting that addresses current overcrowding while anticipating future growth. Any redistricting should be done in the most targeted and limited way possible to minimize disruption to students. I'd start with drawingthe lines for HS#13, and then focus the more immediate redistricting on areas not slated to be moved to the new school, to ensure that the same neighborhoods are not moved twice. I would also have the redistricting apply beginning with the rising 9th graders, who will already be at a natural transition point, rather than disrupting kids already settled in their high schools The ideas above noted, we do not have enough data to make an informed decision about an appropriate plan of action. Community input is critical but it must be supplemented with data to back up any decisions we make. Lastly, I'd encourage the Board to learn about efforts that have worked in other parts of the country to address overcrowding, as this problem is not unique to Howard County. For example, we might consider developing specialized academies in schools with excess capacity-e. g., around STEM, the arts, or coding-to draw interested students from overcrowded schools." This quote is directly from Board of Education member Sabina Taj's campaign web site published in mid 2018 (http://sabinataj. org/redistricting/). I believe this is a sensible approach to redistricting, and I truly hope that SabinaTaj and the other members of the board will adhere to their campaign promises with regard to the boundary review process. Sincerely, Erica S. Murakami Polygon 186 October 23, 2019 October 25, 2019 Sent to: redistricting(S)hcpss, org Dear Board of Education, My name is Jennifer Wamsley, Polygon 183, and I strongly oppose the Superintendent's proposed redistricting plan, hereinafter, the Pton, for five primary reasons: (1) the Planmoves the children of Polygon 183 needlessly, when no overcrowdingexists; (2) the Plan does not give weightto the mental health issues and burdens on families that it will cause; (3) the Plan does not effectively address equity; (4) the Plan does not consider cost; and (5) the process to create the Plan did not allow for input from the entire Howard County community. I am a homeownerin Howard County, work full-time in Washington, DC, and am the mother of three HCPSSstudents. I believe in public educationand equity, yet the Plan erodesthe effectiveness of public education in HowardCounty and does nothingto truly address equity. I will address eachof my reasons for opposing the Plan in more detail below, but request that Polygon 183 not be redistrictedto Wilde LakeHigh School and continue to be districtedto River Hill HighSchool. In the alternative, ifcapacity at River Hill High School becomes an issue, redistrict Polygon 183 to our next closest high school with capacitywhich is Glenelg High School. 1. Moving Polygon 183 is Not Necessary to Address Overcrowding InthecaseofPolygon 183, we are districted to attend River Hill High School. River Hill High School is currently within capacity, 94% utilization, and capacity projections do not forecast River Hill HighSchool going above capacityin the nextfive years. 1 The 2019 Feasibility Study, did not recommend redistricting Polygon 183 under either option. However, the Plan, redistricts Polygon 183 to Wilde Lake High School. Given River Hill HighSchool iswithin target capacityand projected to remainwithin target capacityin the near term, the move ofPolygon 183 is not necessary to address overcrowding. Ms. Mallo listed in her Powerpoint presentation during the first work session the schools that are currently overcrowded and requiring relief, neither River Hill High School, Wilde Lake High School, nor Glenelg High School fall into that category. River Hill High School has capacity to accept additional students, thus capacity or overcrowding does not necessitateredistricting of Polygon 183. 1 n addition, this request isconsistent with HCPSS Policy 6010 IV. B. l. 1 2019 Feasibility Study. Ifcapacity does require Polygon 183to be redistricted, werequest that Polygon 183 be redistricted to Glenelg High School. Glenelg High School is the next closest high school to our home, is within our current feed, and is currently under capacity. This request is consistent with HCPSS Policy 6010 IV. B. 2. 2. Significant Risk of Increased Stress to Students and High Burden on Families a. Significantly Longer Bus Rides UndeLt/ie Plan Currently, our bus picks up at6:40amfor River Hill High School. The bus ride is 45 minutes eachwayto River Hill HighSchool. Thatmeans thatstudents in ourpolygon currently spend 90 minutes a dayon the bus to RiverHill HighSchool. RiverHill HighSchool is 5. 2 miles from our home and there is only 1 traffic light on the route. Under t/iePton, students in Polygon 183 would travel an additional 2 to 4 miles farther, depending on route, to reachWilde Lake HighSchool. That bus route would encounter between 7 and8 additionaltraffic lightson highertraffic roads.Conservatively, this means an additional 15 to 20 minutes more to the bus route making the new bus ride between 60- 70 minutes eachway for a total of 2 to 2. 25 hours on the bus eachday. Under the Plan, buses would need to pick up 15-20 minutes earlier putting pick up times around 6:20am. Thatmeans that students from Polygon 183would needto wake up shortly afterSam to get ready to catch the bus. As someone who commutes two a nd a half hours each day to Washington DC, I would not wish that commute on anyone, especially a child. Given the availablecapacity at River Hill HighSchool, Ida not believe it is necessaryto redistrict Polygon 183and add commuting burden to students in Polygon 183. Ifcapacity does necessitate redistricting of Polygon 183,then it would make sense to move Polygon 183to the nextclosest high school with capacity, for Polygon 183,that isGlenelg High School. Glenelg HighSchool is4. 1 miles from our home and would be similarto our current highschool commute in termsof mileage,traffic conditions, and commute time. b. Pplygon 183 Traffic Please know that none of the roads in our area have street lights and all are rural two lane roads. In addition, wehave roundabouts and areasof significant congestion today. The roundabout betweenSheppard LaneandFolly QuarterRoad,the main arteryin andout of our community, is currently strugglingto handle the increased traffic due to the expansion of the Glenelg Country school (a private school) and new housing development in thearea. Putting more busses and inexperienced teen drivers on these roads, at a time when Calvin Ballis callingfor a reduction in trafficand improved transit infrastructure, seems at cross purposes. 2 Inaddition, increasingbus routescreatesa negativeenvironmental impactata time when Howard County and the country are trying to reduce carbon emission. 2 "Calvin Ball saysHowardCounty needs to i mprove transit infrastrudu re, " Baltimore Business Journal, October 16, 2019. ' ' ----"--..-'--"' c. EmergencyPick Up Harderfor Our Family Under the Pfan, I will have children spread across the county-between Triadelphia Ridge ElementarySchool, Folly QuarterMiddle School, a nd Wilde LakeHigh School. Inthe event of an emergency, it will be exponentially harder to pick up my children. It would require me to travel 10. 6 miles, approximately 25 minutes, to reach and pick up my three children from three different schools under ideal conditions. An emergency is rarely under ideal conditions. Currently, picking up mythree children would require 5. 6 miles, approximately 13 minutes. Reachingmy children in the event ofan emergencyis not a theoretical concern for me, my family was faced with this issue just last school year. On May30, 2019, a tornado touched down and torethrough our neighborhood leaving in its wake downed treesand powerlines not to mention significant damagetoour home and neighborhood. Most of the roads in our areawere blocked and unpassable. Afterthe tornado passed, parents in Polygon 183went out to cut trees that blocked the roads and tried to find elementary school students that had been released to the bus aftersheltering at the school. Eachminute not knowing wheremy children were or how the bus was going to reach our neighborhood was excruciating, I cannot imaginedealing withtrying to drive and pick up my children whenthey are spread across the county. There is no reason to create this situation and no reason to redistrict Polygon 183. d. Significant Loss of Sleep Our pediatrician believesand others pediatricianshave testified to the necessity of sleepfor teenagers. ThePton effectively robs the students of Polygon 183 an additional hour of sleep each school day. The loss of sleep creates real harm not only to physical development, but createsadditional emotional stress. At a time when suicide is the leading cause of death for teens in Howard County, reducing the time available to sleep and adding the stress of a longer commute seemsirresponsible and needless. Asa parentof threedaughters, I worry about adding stress to their shoulders. It does not seem to me that the BOE has considered the harms ttePtons will cause all students and balanced that against any potential benefits. e. Loss of Friendships and Supoorts Moving Polygon 183to Wilde LakeHigh School needlessly disrupts the feed between Triadelphia RidgeElementary, Folly QuarterMiddle School, and River Hill HighSchool. The Plan will needlessly breakthe long-term friendships and community supports my children andfamily currentlyenjoy. Stabilityand continuity arecritical to teenagersandfamilies alike. Mydaughter relies on her friends for emotional support, her friends are her most trusted allies and sounding board. They help her deal with stressful social situations and provide support that reinforcesher family support system. These arefriends she hashad since Kindergartenand they cannot simply be replaced.Absent a compelling reason, I do not think pulling herfrom her friends and support system is in herbest interest. She needsclose friends andconfidants in addition to herfamily to navigatethe choppy watersof teenage life. Please do not underestimate the value of these friendships to my daughter, or the other students of Polygon 183. For me, I rely on other families in the area to help when my schedule changeswithout warning or to carpool to afterschool activities. My husband and I both work full-time over an hour from our home, our neighborhood supports arecritical. We have built these relationships over many years and do not want to lose them needlessly. Our family already strugglesto balancework, family, and life events; absent a compelling reason-there is no need to make our life more difficult to juggle. 3. Equity The driving force behind the Plan is equity. I support that goal wholeheartedly; however, do notseehowshiftinglargenumbersof children between schools advances equity or closes the achievement gap. HCPSS is a diverse and integrated school system that is highly regarded in the state. Eachschool receivessimilar funding per student with Title I schools receiving additional funds. 3 I n my opinion, shuffling students between schools masks the problems that create the achievementgap and minimizesthe likelihood that supports and services will be createdto directlytarget the cause(s) of the achievementgap. It appears as if HCPSS has identified supports and programsthatdo directly address equity and the achievementgap, particularlyat Hammond HighSchool. " At Hammond HighSchool, faculty, staff, parents, and the community came togethertofoster an environment that not only encouraged students to take at least one higher level course, but also created the supports necessary to foster success including the Step It Up Workshop, AP Boot Camp, Alpha Achievers, ESOLHomework Club, and removing prerequisites for the advanced courses. 5 In addition, Hammond HighSchool provided additional trainingand support for teachers. GThis program has not only been recognizednationally, it seems to be delivering measurable results in increasing enrollment in advanced classes and improving graduation ratesamong African American, Hispanic, and special needs students.7 HCPSS has one model, the Hammond High School model, that is delivering measurable results in closing the achievement gap. Why not expand thisto other schools and even expand the program within Hamond High School? There havebeen a number ofsuggestions from the community about other programs that have been found to narrow the achievement gap such as languageemersion programs, magnet 3 Meeting of County Council and Board of Education, (Dr. Wuaskedaboutfunding levels of each school and confirm ed thatthefundinglevels perstudent are thesa me between schools with Title I schoolsreceiving additional funding. ), September 23, 2019. ""HowoneMarylandhighschool successfully boosted mi noritystudentenrollmentin advancedclasses, " V. Strauss, TheWashington Post, July 10, 2018. s Id. 6 Id. 11d. programs, universal pre-K, tutoring programs, and many others. Why not focus our effort and funds on programs that we know will make a difference to students? Forced bussing and shuffling students does not solve any problem and merely masks the problem. Further, "[i]t's not clear from the research available today that socioeconomic integration alone would produce the hoped-for gainson the academic side ofthe integration equation. The research on the effects of socioeconomic integration, including studies frequently cited by the strategy's proponents, is inconclusive. " 8 HCPSS should place its effort and funds to support programsthat have a proven track record of delivering results, not gamble on a bussing strategythat simply hides the problem. And certainly, should not needlessly rip any student from their neighborhood and family support system. Study after study show that neighborhood and family supports are key ingredients for the success of a student, but especially important to vulnerable students.9 It is not clear to me that t/ieP/on provides sufficient benefit to students impacted by redistricting to outweigh the harms to all students from the: (1) loss of friends, (2) loss of community supports, (3) reduced time for familyand extracurricular activities, (4) loss of sleep, and (5) increased time commuting. 4. Cost As a taxpayer, find it repugnant that the P/on was put forward with no cost estimatesor thought to the impact on theHCPSS budget. To date, the only cost information came during the September 23, 2019 meeting between the Board of Education and County Council when Dr. Wu asked for an estimate on the cost of additional transportation as a result of the Pfan. Dr. Wu was told that the cost of the Pfan had not been formally reviewed, but an estimate of $2. 76 million dollars in additional transportation costs are likely if the Pton is implemented. In addition, hundreds of thousands of taxpayer dollars were spent on the 2019 Feasibility Study and that input seems to have been completely disregarded. Why spend money when you do not adhere to or value the advice? Given the budget cuts last year that led to the reduction ofparaeducators(76 cut) and technology programs, it hagglesthe mindthat the BOEwould spend moneyon a Feasibility study it had no intention of using or entertain implementing a P/an that dramatically raises transportation costs going into FY 2021. The $2. 76 million dollars in additional transportation that would result from implementation of the Pfon could be used to add 92 paraeducators or 46 entry level teachers. "HCPSS need more 8 A Reality Check on the Benefits of Economic I ntegration, FutureEd, Georgetown University McCourt School of Public Policy, Sarah A. CordesPhD, August 26, 2019. The 2019 HCPSS Equity Reportsuggests a negative i mpactwhen I ow-lncome students a re removed from (1) thel r fami lial and neighb orhood supports and (2) transpo rtation a nd geographic barriers a relncreased to beyond school opportunities. TAePfon removes both for eachstudent impacted by the redistrictingpton. 10This calculation assumes the annual cost of a paraeducatorto be $30, 000per yea rand anentry-level teacher to be $60, 000 per year. Dr. Wu shared these figures on September 23, 2019. paraeducatorsand teachers, not more buses. Paraeducatorsand teachers benefit all students in the HCPSS. Or the $2. 76million dollars could be used to addresslead and legionella in the waterat certain schools, fund capita I improvements, fund programs that support vulnerable students such as tutoring programs, language immersion programs, or magnet programs. If you want to benefit all HCPSSstudents, use these funds to delayschool starttimes, whichas been proven to increase learning retention and raise standardizedtest scores. One expense associated with the Plan that has not been contemplated is the cost to defend against any legal action brought as a result of adoption of the Pfon. The Plan\n its current form createsthe appearance of discriminating againstthe Asian community and uses FARM designationas a proxyfor raceand ethnic assignment. Given CR 112, statementsby county officials, and the process that leadto the creationof thePton, a legalchallengeseems highly likely. Defending the P/on would be costly and in essence would be using taxpayer dollars to defend a Plan that it appears the majority of the community does not support. 5. Process The process that led to the creation of the Plan seems flawed at best. The differences between the 2019 Feasibility Study and the Plan are dramatic. For me, the Plan came out of left field, did not reflect the priorities of the community, and was released in a way to minimize the community's ability to fully understand and evaluate the Pton. The Plan was release on August 21, 2019 and the first Public Hearings began on September 17, 2019. A few weeks is not sufficient time to fully evaluate a P/on that differs so dramaticallyfrom the 2019 Feasibility Study. The late release of the Plan, in the middle of summer vacation season, seems an intentional effort to hide the ball from the community. Process matters, not only to the outcome, but when done correctly, fosters community involvement and acceptance of the proposed changes. The process that led to the creation of the Plan appearsto be motivated by political agendas. Even if this is not the case, the press releases and statements by county executives strongly suggest a political agenda. Others have more eloquently andfactually detailed the flawsin the process, but one in particularseems highly suspect to me. TheAAC selected solely by Dr. Martlranofailedto include input from the Asian community or Western Howard County. The minutes from the various meetings of the AAC are sparse or incomplete, but what has emerged from the information released is a view that most AAC members held particularpolitical viewsthat shaped their input into the creation of the Plan. Howard County and the HCPSS deserve better. Better process, better planning, and better behaviorfrom the adultsin the room. Noone in HowardCounty should suffer. Noone. For the reasons articulatedabove, request that Polygon 183 not be redistricted to Wilde Lake High School and continue to be districted to River Hill High School. Inthe alternative, if capacityat River Hill High School becomes an issue, redistrict Polygon 183 to our next closest high school with capacitywhich is Glenelg High School. am a mother of elementary school and middle school students in Clarksville. Currently, my kids are attending Clarksville Elementary School and Clarksville Middle School. My family moved from North Laurel about 3 years ago, just for better public schools. Before then, sent my older son to St. Louis School, though we are not Catholic. We moved to Clarksville so that my kids can attend Clarksville Elementary School, Clarksville Middle School and River Hill High School. Clarksville is farther from my work in Baltimore and also farther from my husband work in Burtonsville. So, just for the best public schools, we moved. The house was expensive but we were willing to sacrifice both money and commute time for our kids' education. We have been happy with the decision that we made. However, the newly proposed redistriction plan left many parents like us flabbergasted. This is wrong. This plan penalizes parents who moved to better school zones because of underperforming neighbor schools which were not previously slated for their kids. In terms of performance on State Tests, Clarksville Middle School (CMS) scores highest (84. 5% in Math, and 85. 4% in English) and also has great music program. However, the new plan puts my younger one to HCMS with one of the poorest scores (35. 9% in Math, 35. 1% in English). This is even lower than where we moved from - MHMS (36. 5% in Math, 41.4% in English). It is well known that housing price is high in area with best public schools. Parents, and students, should not be punished for moving for that reason. I have seen many parents moving from Maryland to Fairfax County in hopes of sending their kids to Thomas Jefferson High School. The newly proposed plan will likely improve underperforming schools'score if the parents are willing to send their kids to those schools. However, with what cost? This is demoralizing to the students who are forced to go to underperforming schools. To save face of Board of Education in Howard County, the younger brother cannot go to the same middle school that his older brother is currently attending? I think parents like us, who moved for better schools, will not send the kids to underperforming schools. This plan will force parents like us to send kids to private schools in and outside Howard County, if not move outside Howard County. Parents are already paying high property taxes for the expensive houses, yet also having to pay for the private school tuition is absurd. In addition, commute time to private school could be 35mintues in non-rush hour. This proposal disrupts close bonds that kids made in their elementary school. All Clarksville Elementary School kids have gone to Clarksville Middle School. This plan involuntarily uproots many kids from where they formed community. If there is capacity issue, and the students in under performing schools are willing to attend under-utilized better performing schools, I am not opposed. However, involuntarily forcing students (who otherwise would attend best performing school) to attend underperforming schools to lessen the gap between schools, is plain wrong. This only serves the Board of Education, not the students. I also do not think Board of Education has right to re-district school zones to lower Asian and or 2ndgeneration immigrant populations in well performing schools. This is in part, racism. Anyone can buy a house where he/she wants, if one is able to afford. If Asians and Caucasians flock to better school zones, so be it. This does not mean that they have to be dispersed for the sake of looking somewhat leveled. In the end, this proposal will not improve Howard County. People won't buy houses in Howard County due to uncertainty, and they will move to other counties. Sungyon Jang, Clarksville Pike, polygon 185 Kathleen V. Hanks From: Pauline Hsu Dear Members of the BOB, This is Dr. Pauline Hsu, a Pediatrician, a resident ofpolygon 3176, a Howard county resident of25 years, a mother of2 HCPSSgraduates. I amwriting to askyou to continue to opposeDr. Martirano's Redistricting proposal and keep polygon 3176 at RHHS. I wantto thankyou for approval ofthe exemption for risingjuniors to be redistricted! It is the first step in the right direction! Through testimonies and work session, we know RHHS is under-capacity and should not be the driven force for Redistricting. Polygon 3176 is so close to RHHS andshould not be bypassedto a long awayschool. It is badfor kids, families, traffic and school budget! We also find RHHS FARMrate is not much changedafter redistricted. Andthe graduationrate for thosekids at RHHS is lower than Wilde Lake HS. We should use the resources to hire more Qualified teachers to really help out those kids, and not send them out of the way to get lost in a faraway school. In conclusion, please continue to vote No to Dr. Martirano's Redisto-ictingproposal. Thank you very much for your time and service! Pauline Hsu, MD Sent from my iPhone Kathleen V. Hanks From: Claire Huang Dear BOE members, My name is Claire Huang. I live in polygon 176. lam 14 and am currendy a freshman in River Hill High School. Thankyou for exempting the risingjuniors from the redistricting. I amwriting this letter to askyou to please not move any rising sophomores out from their high school after they have already started their freshman year. Starting high school is already an extremely stressful experience, and forcing the freshman class, who have adjustedto the life oftheir current school, to re-adjustto a differenthigh school will only increasethe pressure and workload we have to deal with. Thank you for your consideration and I hope you choose to allow all current high schoolers to stay at their school. Claire Huang HowardCounty Board of Education: We, the residents ofpolygon 1185 (District 4 and 5) named below, strongly urge all of our elected representatives on the Board of Education to adopt a boundary plan that keeps the students from oiir polygon at River Hill High School ("RHHS") and Clarksville Middle School ("CMS"). Overarching our position is the belief that the Board of Education should work to "Do no harm" to our children and operate in a fiscally responsible manner. The recent written and oral testimony from medical and education professionals, as well as from the students themselves, informs our view that minimizing time on buses and keeping students together at schools located in or near their neighborhoods is a critical component to avoiding negative consequences, including risks to educational achievement, as well as increased risks of bullying, mental health issues and suicide. Accordingly, in a manner consistent with all ofthe factors of Policy 6010, busing students longer distances awayfrom their communities shouldbe minimized, otherthan as necessary to alleviate overcrowding. In addition, we respectfully request the Board to implement other options/programs that have been proven to improve educational outcomes for FARMS students. Polygon 1185 is currenfly districted to attend Clarksville Elementary School ("CES"), Clarksville Middle School ("CMS") andRiver Hill High School ("RHHS"), but the superintendent's planproposes districting atthe middle andhigh school levels to Harpers ChoiceMiddle School ("HCMS") and Wilde Lake High School ("WLHS") respectively. We believe that Polygon 1185 should remain at RHHS and CMS under Policy 6010 andthe Board should not accept the superintendent's recommendation to redistrict Polygon 1185 for the following reasons: 1. The superintendent's recommendation createsa small feedjssue andseparates the small number ofpolygon 1185 students from all ofthe other students attending CES. Under the superintendent's plan, 15 out of 16 polygons from CES would attend RHHS. In that case, 1185 would be the only polygon split from its entire elementary school community, with only 4% ofthe students attending a different high school. In addition, the community ofCES students should remain together at CMS because they are drawn from polygons that are all an integral part ofthe River Hill community. All Proposed Clarksville Clarksville Elementary Elementary School Polygons 96%ofClarksville School Polygons going to Elementary Feeds to River Hill High School 28 1028 2028 : River Hill 28 1028 2028 185 1185 185 186 1186 186 1186 187 1187 187 1187 Only 1185 split from 188 1188 188 1188 neighborhood 135 1135 2135 135 1135 2135 1174 2174 1174 2174 2. Polygon 1185 is within the walkable radius (as defined at both the elementary and high school levels) ofCES and RlfflS which both sit on the same campus. Among many other benefits, closeproximity to our schools greatly enhancesthe level ofparent engagement/volunteering and student participation in extracurricular activities. 3. Keepinepolveon 1185 students at RHHSand CMS keepsthe students connected to their community and neiehborine contieuous Dolvsons 185 and 1186. 1185 is contiguous to polygons 185 and 1186, which both remain at RHHS and should remain at CMS. There are no roads or pathways connecting 1185 to any other polygons. The Middle Patuxent environmental area and river provide significant boundaries to the east and north. There is no reasonable basisto differentiate and separate 1185 from its contiguous pair 185 and all ofthe rest ofthe Clarksville Elementary polygons thatmake up our community. CMS has always beenan unportant part ofthe River Hill/Clarksville community, while HCMS is clearly part ofthe Harper's Choice community. 4. Keeping polveon 1185 students at RHHS avoids a bus ride that would be approximately ten times further awaythan the current walkable distance, thereby: a. Reducing transportation costs: b. Saving significant student travel time. The Board cankeep Polygon 1185 at RHHS without a significant impact to anyother polygons or boundary plan since our polygon is an island separated to the nonh and east by the natural boundary ofthe Middle Patuxent environmental areaand the other similarly-situated polygons of 185 and 1186 are already districted to RHHS. 5. Keeoine students atRHHS andCMS reduces overcrowdine andfrees up additional caoacitv at the proposed receiving schools. For example, the superintendent's recommendationwouldsend our children to a receiving high school (WLHS) to the east which is projected to approach the 110% capacity limit (4% higher thanRHHS). The proposed receiving middle school (HCMS) is also located to the eastwith the risk ofadditional middle school redistricting for Polygon 1185 in thenear future asdowntown Columbia (in closerproximity to Harper's Choice) continues its buildout. In conclusion, keeping students at RHHS and CMS is consistent with the guidelines ofpolicy 6010. Onthe other hand,the superintendent's proposal violates these guidelines onmany fronts. Further, busingstudents awayfrom RHHS and CMS would have no meaningful impactto reducing the educational achievement gapfor FARM students basedon the FARM andnon-FARM student performance datapresented inthe written andoral testimony previously providedto the Board, whileputting the children ofpolygon 1185 at greater risk and incurring significant additional costs that are fiscally irresponsible. We askthe Board, as our elected representatives, to keep the CES/CMS/RHHS feeds together, while devoting the school system's precious resources to implementing programs that are proven to improve student performance. The following residents ofpolygon 1185 have approved this statement and agreed to have their names added to this statement in full support. The following residents of polygon 1185 have added their names in full support of the preceding community statement: First Name Last Name First Name Last Name Ade Adejana Natasha Easley Michelle Adejana Adelaide Easley Teniola Adejana Jackson Easley Abiola Adejana Joshua Felsenberg Eriola Adejana Naomi Felsenberg Li Bi Steven Felsenberg Barbara Bormel Amy Finch Larry Bormel Mike Finch Diane Caplan Parker Finch Mitehell Caplan Sebastian Finch Sophie Caplan Cameron Finch Henry Caplan Violet Finch Lisa Chodnicki Aysel Fisgin Chris Chodnicki Ibrahim T. Fisgin Ben Chodnicki EceM. Fisgin Alyssa Chodnicki Eda Fisgin Ethan Chodnicki Jeff Garbis Nathan D. Conger Sari Garbis Emma M. Conger Kambiz Ghozati Bruce M. Conger MD Shadi Ghozati Damn Crisitello Emma Ghozati Renee Crisitello Annand Ghozati Nicoletta Crisitello Pat Glasgow Carmella Crisitello Paul Glasgow Nadine Crisitello Sonny Goel Tony Crisitello Swati Goel Sabina Crisitello Shaan Goel Michael Crisitello Dilan Goel Chuck Cullen Ernest M. Graham Sophie Cullen Julie L. Graham Carolyn Cullen Mary E. Graham Katie Cullen Benjamin M. Graham Ali Dashti Lillian E. Graham Paulo Docouto Robert A. Graham Kay Docouto Rong Guo Alexandre Docouto Micah Hart Maria Docouto Leigh Hart Yiannis Docouto Carly Hart Tara Easley Max Hart Don Easley Ace Hart The following residents ofpolygon 1185 have added their names in full support of the preceding community statement: First Name Last Name First Name Last Name Nishanth Jakkampudi Lisa Rubin Praneel Jakkampudi Ali Sarraf Stephanie Kaminsky Nikoo Sarraf Fereshteh Kassiri Tara Sarraf Michael Kim Jeri Shuster MD Joan Kim Emma Silverstein Dennis Kim Scott Silverstein Kevin Kim Sidney Silverstein Heather Kim Gary R. Smith Grace Kim Ninghai Sun Benjamin Kim Neda Talaii Timothy Kim Wigand Theimer Qing Li Rosemaiie Theimer Lean Liang John Troutman Shane Liu Rick Vanasse Julia Liu Maris Vanasse Amit Patel Michael Vasilios Nisha Patel Sonya Vasilios Souia Patel William Vasilios Priya Patel Madeline Vasilios Sheridan Phillips Gary Wu John Phillips Koenig Jean Wu Michelle Poirier Isabelle Wu Panthea Rafei Brandon Wu Keyvan Rafei Nirmala Yadla Dr. Jennifer Ramelmeier HemaP Yadla Louis Renbaum Julie Yang Laura Renbaum Nicole Yang Bruce Rosenblum MD David Yang David Rowlett Natalie Yang Julie Rowlett Luke (Yong) Yun Jacob Rowlett Curtis Yun Emma Rowlett Joyce Yun Caroline Rowlett Valerie Yun Rabbi Barry Rubin 10/24/2019 Hello BOE Members and Superintendent Martirano, Thank you for taking the time to read my email. I hope it is able to stand out amongst the many, manyvoices you have been hearingfrom, with so many differences of opinion and personal impact stories. I am writing from polygon 1056 and I have three children currently in HCPSS. When all of my children have completed school, I will come out with 28 years as a HCPSSparent and supporter. My experience in the school system has ranged from RECC, several ES's, a MS, and a HS so far. Thoughts on Teachers and Redistricting; As part ofmy volunteer service to the schools, I use my professional background to analyze HCPSS supplied data and surveys. I study these with hopes ofgaining an overall understanding ofthe school system workings and considerations. My readings of testimonies and surveys make me fear that the voice of teachers has not been heard. Teacher satisfaction is a very import aspect ofthis whole system and I think the teachers have shown their concern of the concentration of poverty we currently have across our schools. I have seen high turnover rates in my children's schools, particularly MS, which I haven't seen in the past. I see comments and struggles in my children's MS and HS about classes offered/not offered, trips, supplies, facilities and equipment. This impacts our school community and I feel the redistricting should help to optimize resources and do so through balancingmore aspects ofpolicy 6010. Capacityutilization has been the focus for too long when other aspects ofthe policy are important as well. When I look at the teacher survey [HCEAJob Satisfaction Survey) it was interesting to see the different qualitative and quantitative answer analysis that was provided by school and to compare the results across schools. I wanted to pull further and understand if there was any stratification of schools that was happeningbased on these teacher reHections. I startedwith the HSlevel [I worked more levels but it is simpler to reHect here the smaller set as the same is seen in other levels' data) with some cluster analysis using all ofthe questions andresponses. I looked at howsurveys were answered at one school compared to a different school and what that universe looks like. Were some schools clustering together in their responses? In basicterms, to do this analysis I centered around each high school's responses and calculated the distance from other HS responses for every question on the survey. I used that measurement to create a sum ofdistances indicator and then I was able to group these responses into four clusters. You can compare and contrast the HS'sand their assigned cluster results on the table [please note the numbering of the cluster has no placement value, it is just reference for the cluster group; 1 is not better or worse than 2). I added some additional information for you from the same time period the survey data was from. sum FARMS cluster school across FAI&IS Grad rate Grad rate distances .»\lldeLal;eHS 22 "5996 39.20»o 82.72»i 70.40»o OaUaudMiUsHt> 2? 75019 44. 90% 90. 37»4 86. 11»-» HaauuondHS Z2 j.5-4! 35. JO°»1 90.20° o 84. 62»» Mt HebiouHS 16442-9 14.-'0»o 94. 12°. ;4. 13Ili Manioas Ridye HS I-.'14?7 <5% >95».» >95% Rivei Hill HS 17 126-'S <5». 9J.8S°o 20»o Re^^n'oii HS !^. -2531 26° I, 94. 23°» 90.48»o Long Reach Its 13.11436 34. 60° o S4.72% 72. SI»o HowAid HS a. :. ')j':^ 12.50»«! 94*; 85. 19% i4. 966-'E 8.70»» ;950/o >95»; I40.U9- 10.50° » ~-95°o 91.89»o 14 6SG2 . :5»t>i >95% It seems to me, through this analysis, that it is more similarly difficult for teachers in some schools than other schools and this is reflected when other similar datais also clustered in these groups, whichwas addedafter the groups were created through clustering. I think to support our teachers, the BOE needs to consider how boundary adjustment can improve these results in the teacher satisfaction survey. Ourteachers deserveto berespected andsupported by the schoolsystem andto beset up for successwith our kids asmuch aspossible. Thoughts on 2019 Redistricting Process vs Pravsous Process: I wasinvolved in the 2017redistricting process through my community in several regards. My most major concerns were that the data wasn't accurate coming out ofOSP and it wasn't clear to me howexactly Policy 6010 was utilized. In that redistricting time, it seemed that Policy 6010 was usedto trigger a redistrictingfor several reasons,but then it wasn'thonestly implemented to create the boundaryadjustments instead beingused only as a check point. For example, a move was manually made on a map to change enrollment from one school to the next and then the other line items for policy 6010 were checked; "how does FARMS % change?", "What does the feed structure look like?". None of these were handled objectively and it concerned me. I didn't understand, because I havemodeling experience, whywe couldn't weighthe lines ofPolicy 6010 to what represents our HCPSS. Fastforward to 2019, the Superintendent has brought out the "Strategic Call to Action" which maps out what equity looks like for HCPSS. Included in this documentation was howboundary adjustments can support what equity looks like for the school system. In 2017, the BOE also hired Consultants to help support the boundary adjustments. The same OSPoffice put out the Feasibility Study for 2019 using past modeling tools, but what changed was the methodologythe Superintendentsupported. Hesupported a datadriven, policy- based optimization model for redistricting. The Consultant group used OSPdata and modeled what different scenarios would be like when different lines ofthe Policy 6010 was weighted differently. These models could look at what would the outcomeboundary adjustment map looklike ifthe countyaverage is usedfor FARMS, what would it look like if minimized for distance traveled? What would it look like if we were ok with busing walkers if it meant other children in the county have a far shorter bus ride? Whatwould it look like if everyone went to their closest school? What the Superintendent published is what he and his team felt reHected on the goals that the community, the school system, and supporters all agreed on. It was created with an objective view because it is modeled in a fashion that (Optimization Modeling), withthe weighting of specific variable importance, reflects a balance ofthe goals. Sure, some folks think the moves are not enough, some think they are too much. Perhaps that is a sign that it is very close to a balance that the county can accept at this point in society time. Thoughts ORthe Supe-intenc.ents Plan: Thereare a couple ofchanges I wouldlike to seehappen in the Superintendent's Plan after reHecting on what concerns I have heard andwhat I think can help the balance now; -1 would like polygon 1200 to stay where it currently is. Ifyou look at the current bus route for this polygon, it picks them up then jumps over the highwayand picks up another group before heading to the school. There isn't a back route to the east in this polygon. This stay would not change impact to either school changes in the plan too much. -1 would like to see polygon 64 split to the east of Quiet Night Ride, creating a new polygon for where the Robinson Overlook is going to be built. This new polygon, that will contain Robinson Overlook, should be slated to attend demons Crossing ES,WLMS and AHS like the neighbor polygon 130. - Polygon 273 should staywhere it is currently assigned. Newdevelopment in that polygon mightbe considered to move to HS13 andmoving it nowwould remove that consideration when HS13 comes online due to timing and multiple moves of the area. -1 think polygon 96 should be considered to be split into two polygons. This polygon contains two apartment complexes as well as several students. Splitting this polygon will give more freedom to explore the best options to support the polygon assignment. It could be similar to polygon 97 where a full bus heads to a school, or it could be that one group walks one way and the rest attend the other walk school. At least the possibility to have the discussion could happen more easily if it is split into two. - With any redistricting that allows juniors and seniors to not be redistricted, there are transportation costs. Please consider bus solutions like usingbus hubs (similar as currently functioning for Jumpstart) for MS and HS as well as a bus route that picks up the current route and delivers at one school and then the next school to handle the double busing issues (similar to how ARL transportation is currently done). The Superintendent's plan has just about the same average distance/time traveled across the county as what currently is happening. Yes, there are differences as to where changes are happening in transportation time/distance but there are no gross outliers in the Superintendent's plan compared to what we currently experience. Many of these changes made in the Superintendent's plan are keeping/creating stronger feeds. - As for moving walkers, the data OSPreleases has a flagby polygon for if the polygon is a walker or bus rider in their current boundary assignment. There is alsoa lackof historical dataon ifa polygon is a walkerto anotherschool. Being so, please consider asking Transportation to supply what polygons currently have a bus route in them andthen cross that with if that polygon hasa current walker flag. The current boundaries have close to the same percentage of walkers being bused as the Superintendents plan does. -I would like to see a joint work effort between CC and BOE to provide solutions to after school activities at the MS and HS levels. I think there are resources that can be shared or redirected at specifictimes for supporting kids/families. In particular, using RTA bus to support MS and HS groups that have been reassigned for after school activities, similar to what Activity Buses look like at schools now. Thankyou for listening to my analysis andideas. Please support the Superintendent's goals towards equity and listen to what his plan is saying. It is a step in the right direction. Jolene Mosley October 24, 2019 Board of Education 10910 Clarksville Pike Ellicott City, MD 21042 Dear Board of Education: Wethank the Board of Educationfor the opportunity to providetestimony via this letter. We also thank everyone for participating in this effort, recognizing that we all have the same end goal of creating the best learning environment for our children. Westronglv ooposethe Superintendent's ProposedAttendance Area Adjustment Planthat was presented on Aueust 22, 2019 because the plan violates the standards of Policy 6010. In particular, the proposed plan violates section IV. B. 2, which promotes community stability, for our daughter and other children in our community. Our daughter is currently a Sth grader at Atholton Elementary School. The proposed plan would not affect the middle and high schools that shewill attend. However, under the proposed plan, my daughter will be separated from all of her school friends because all except three polygons served byAtholton Elementary would feed into Lake Elkhorn Middle School. Across the three polygons that will feed into Hammond Middle School (polygons 16, 1014, and 1016), there are less than 40 elementary school-aged children accordingthe HCPSSenrollment projections. Inthe currentfifth grade,there areonly a handful of children living in these polygons. Under the Superintendent's oroposed plan. my dauehter would be one of only two eirls from her elementary school to attend Hammond Middle School. This is clearly less than the recommended 15% minimum feed mentioned in Policy6010 section IV. B. 2. Ifthe Superintendent's proposed plan passes as is, my daughter's transition to middle school, daunting even under the best of circumstances, would have to be made alone, in isolation from her friends. Ourdaughter is very activeand participatesin severalcommunity groups, suchas the neighborhood swim team and Girl Scouts. In order to meet other children at her middle school, she will likely need to switchGirl Scouttroops and swim teams. Thiswill further separate herfrom the friendsthat she has developed while at Atholton Elementary. In essence, we would need to completely rebuild our lives. The proposed plan would also adversely affect the elementary school-aeed children in our neighborhood. Under the proposed plan, polygons 16, 1014, and 1016 would attend Guiiford Elementary. Although Guilford Elementary is a wonderful school, our neighborhood is not geographically connected to it We are separated from the school by a large commercial district (with zero children) and major roads. Children in our neighborhood would not be able to walk or bike to their friend's houses. Our neighborhood would become an island, disconnected from their elementary school community. Policy6010 states that "school attendance areas should promote a sense ofcommunity through the consideration of... areasthat are made up of contiguous communities or neighborhoods." We fail to see how the proposed plan would meet this recommendation. The Dickinson community is already divided into two elementary schools: Atholton and Hammond. The proposed plan would further divide our community into yet another elementary school. Although Polygon 16 is roughlyequidistant betweenthe three elementary schools,only Atholton offers a walkable or bicycle-friendly route. Infact, we walk to Atholton twice a week. Viathe pathways in Columbia, we are able to walkthe 1.8 miles to Atholton and only cross 4 residential streets. It is an extremely pleasant walk, and we invite the Board of Education members to join us. The Superintendant's proposed plan would also divide our community into two middle schools: Hammond and LakeElkhorn. Ina world were personalconnections are sovital to maintain, it is unclearwhy the Board of Educationwould wantto create these unnatural divisions.We'd like for the Board of Education to considerkeeping the current Dickinsoncommunity toeether by moving polygons 16, 1014, and 101G with polygons 13, 14, 15. We're sure this situation is not unique, and counsel the Board to Education to consider keeping communities such as Dickinson together, even as they are moved around to achieve the broader goals of resource utilization and demographic diversity. Sincerely, Jules Bergmann and Lisa Wilson Polygon 16 Board of Education 10910 Clarksville Pike Ellicott City, MD 21042 Re: Proposed HCPSS Redistricting To All Howard County Public School System Board of Education Members: My name is Tzvi Robbins. We are in Polygon 1028. feel obligated to write this letter as I feel that our personal liberty is being infringed upon. I have served this country for years. As a US Army officer, I served for 11 years including deployments to South Korea, Kuwait, and Iraq. I fought for liberty. Upon returning and ending my Army service in 2006, 1 have been an Emergency physician in multiple emergency rooms in Maryland. My wife and I chose to live in an area with great schools and we worked very hard to get to this community. We choose to pay ever increasing property taxes in order to ensure that our children get the best education possible. Therefore, whenthe redistricting plans were proposed, we were shocked by its ramifications. Our kids would be bused to a remote location where they would no longer receive nationally ranked education. Why should our kids have to suffer through this experiment in social engineering? Who is to say that this experiment will even be successful in raising standards and increasing diversity? The only thing I perceive that will increase is social outcasts amongthe youths it affects, and poorer school performance. If higher standards and crowding in pre-existing schools is the problem - it should be solved by expanding classrooms and hiring better teachers and staff in those schools - NOT by gerrymandering communities and destroying the entire fabric of Howard County. I believe I speak for many in that we do not wantto see this county's social fabricdestroyed, and we do not wishto be forced to move away. My contact email is: tzvirobbinsiagmail. com. would be happy to speak to Board members at any time. Respectfully, Tzvi Robbins, MD Thank you, Chair Ellis, Vice Chair Coombs, and members ofthe Board of Education for reading my testimony regarding the boundary adjustment process. My name is Grant Vix, and I live in polygon2210. As you begin boundaryadjustments to balance capacity, would like to encourage you to strengthen feeds as much as possible. Large feeds promote a sense of community and belonging. They allow students to establish lasting relationships and deep support systems. Move continuous neighborhoodstogether and do so at all levels whenever possible to further strengthen these systems. When moving a polygon, use the feeds to allow students to join friends from Elementary and Middle School and allow future Elementary and Middle School students to transition with their full class. A few weeks ago, children from Glenelg High School joined their friends in polygon 183 to attend River Hill's homecoming, and thisweeksnd I will be driving down to polygon 1200to pick up River Hill students to go to Glenelg's. Middle school friendships are strong and continue into their freshman year, making changing schools a smoother transition when able to rejoin old friends. I urge you to make this process about reconnecting and not about starting over Thank you for your time. 'JS^. ll6 a 1. 2237 Running Fence Lane-, Clarksville, MD 21029 Phone: 4';3-799-u368 10910 Clarksville Pike Ellicott. City, MD 21042 Phone; 410-313-6600 Dear Board of Education Members, My name is Fen Man. I am from Polygon 3 176. am writing as a resident in Walnut Grove community, Howard county. I would like to start to express my thanks and support to the Board of Education for your approval about the exemption of risingjuniors. Worksession # I exposed anappalling fact that SuperintendentMartirano's school redistricting planwas developed based on inaccurate and obsolete school enrollment data and population growth projection data. The inaccuracy of data resulted in a biased and subjective redistricting proposal. Without enough and correct data, it is hard to make an informed decision. This is a major flaw in the redistricting process. I agree with the data driven approachto redistricting. I appreciatethe board askingfor the most up-to-date 2019attendance data to use in this process. I would like to applaud to the Board of Education to focus on school capacity issue in Work Session #1. 1 would like to quote and echo the statement from the joined letter from Senator Katie Fry Hester, Senator Clarence Lam, and Senator GuyGuzzone abouttop 2 urgent challenges ofHCPSS we are currently facingin the reality. Budget Constraint There are insufficient public funds at the state and local levels to rely exclusively on new school construction to alleviate current overcrowding." . Overcrowded Schools School redistricting is the most immediate and efficient method of addressing overcrowded schools and can no longer be delayed becauseof worsening overcapacity at certain schoolsand the underutilizationof space in other schools within HCPSS. " Senator Katiealso commended the Board of Education to initiate the school redistricting process in accordance with HCPSS Policy 6010, which calls for the following factors to be taken into account in the boundary review process: . Facility utilization includingthe efficientuse of availablespace, projected enrollment, fiscal responsibility, anticipatedtransportation time and distance,and maintainingan equitabledistribution of regional programs located throughout the county. . Community stabilization including feeds that encourage keeping students together (avoiding feeds of iessthan 15%),the contiguousnessof communities and neighborhoods,and the frequency with which any one student is reassigned. Demographiccharacteristics of the student population includingradal/ethnic and socioeconomic composition (as measured by federal FARMS program data), academic performance as measured by standardized testing, level of enrollment in ESOLprograms, and the number of students moved while taking into account (he outcomes of all of the factors above. I would liketo justify myown polygon 3176 and my sisterWalnut Creek community (Polygon 176) on eachof above factors. Both communities are about 1. 5 miles and 4 - 6 minutes' drive from River Hill High School. Please see below map illustration about the close proximity of these 2 communities to River Hill High School. \^«. -. T*' .;/* Pa-a 2 I. Budget Constraint Transportation costs are one ofthe manyfactors considered when evaluating boundary adjustment scenarios. Everyeffort is madeto create "neighborhood"school attendance areas by assigning students to the school that is closest to their home. Every effort is made to avoid reassigning students who can walk to their current school to a school where they would become bus riders. Most Safe Routes to School practitioners agree that a halfmile is as far as most klndergarteners will walk happily, a mile is a reasonable length for older elementary school kids, and that I . 5 miles is an acceptable distance for high schoolers. There are three primary factors could impact student transportation costs through boundary adjustments: ^ Adding route mileage to transport students assigned to new schools >/ Providing bus service to redistricted Grade 12students who choose to remain attheir current high school ^ Transportingstudents currentlydesigned as walkers who become eligible for transportation after boundary adjustments will not repeat the concern and issue about the 2. 7 million bus transportation cost increase proposed in the superintendentplan that numerous residents/groups raisedduring the publichearing testimony. It is not realistic, and most importantly, it is not sustainable. I trust the board of education members' judgement about best use of limited budget for hlCPSS education. Polygon 3176 and 176are qualified to be considered aswalkers to River Hill HighSchool based on proximity criteria. We would like to choose to remain at our current high school which is River Hill High School, rather than go to the assigned newschool which isapprox. one-hour ride for thefirst children picked up eachway. Inthe superintendent's redlstricting plan,there will incurseparate high school busestransportation costs in the samepolygon, onefor theexemption of rising Junior and rising Senior, and the other for the rising freshman andthe sophomore (15 students in my polygon 3176). With sucha small number of students riding separateschool buses in onepolygon, it showsthat the superintendent's plan imposesunreasonable and costly utilization of public transportation resource. We request to keep one bus or minimum number of buses as much as possible for all the students in our polygons (3176 & 176) to go to River Hill High School to best utilize the school bus resources and saving the transportation cost for HCPSS. Furthermore, because currently there is no vralkway directly from our community to River Hill HighSchool, we would likethe Board members to consider the option to allow the community within walker proximity to support HCPSSschools and provide car ride for theirchildren to highschool. This will greatly help reduce the transportation cost. We would support and manage car pool among community families for all the high school students to go to River Hill High School. 2. Overcrowded Schools & Facility utilization River Hill HighSchool is projectedto haveapprox. I ,488(98% capacity) students in year2020. It is 2%under capacity.There are total 15 risingfreshman and sophomore high school students in mypolygon 3176in the Page 3 2020-2021 school year. With sucha fewnumbers of students, request to keep them in the under-capacity River Hill High School. I recommend and support the alternative plan - scenario 2 submitted bySumeet Singh(Polygon 3176)and David Clifton (Polygon 176). Alternative Plan - Scenario 2 Prepared by Sumeet Singh Resident of Polygon 31 76 Dated 10/22/2019 This plan MATCHES the superintendent's plan on EQUITY Delivers BETTER UTILIZATION Does this with LESSER MOVES f.' ^ Ifla'f^tiun 121 . >u" T. ~ nyi. '. » i. tn 7 5;.: w,. :f If^;,:.1t r. * it rota"At^:» ... /''.. ) \'. tflt kttf») ~."iF»^t';'. l h^t fc^tMW -1'Y- T:. '-':r. Highlights: ^ Specialcare has been taken to not moveWalker Zone Polygons. Ifthere are still some exceptions, they can be correned. ^ Special care has beentaken to not create newHS Feederswith 9%or less population. Any exceptions they will only be in the HS13 surrounding schools as described below, since those assignments are temporary. hlS 13 Exception & Planning ahead. ^ (*) Four highschools highlighted in greyare likely to participate inthe 2023 HS13 re-assignments LongReach; Hammond; Oakland Mills & Reservoir.Students haveintentionally not been moved away Pwa4 from these schools, putting their utilization in the 13-115% range. The Superintendent's Plan that has kept these schools at I 00- 108% capacity and that reduced number will not be sufficient to utilize the additional 1, 658 capacity at HS 13. ./ It is recommended that the 339 moves between these 4 schools should not be done in 2020. While these moves have been designed to balance capacity between the 4 schools, and have been included in the stats above, howeversince these moves aretemporary, theycan wait until 2023, bringing down thetotal moves in Scenario2 to only 3,43I (Note:Since these are temporary moves they may contain some walker and feeder exceptions) 3. Community Stabilization River Hill High School is our community school. Maintenanceof feeder pattern shall be avoidingfeeds in lessthan 15%. There are only 15 risingfreshman and sophomores in my polygonfrom middle schoolto high school in the 2020-2021 schoolyear. Ourcommunity students will become a new feed less than 15%! The superintendent's redistrlcting planviolates Policy 6010IV B2 b. contiguouscommunities - many communities are split by the new plan. Byfollowing the guideline of policy 6010, it conforms the policy guidelineto keep our communitystudents atthe River Hill High School. We valuethat the board ofeducation members recognizeand emphasizethe importance ofmaintaining established and contiguous community neighborhood. 4. Demographiccharacteristics of the student population I supportthis factorto be consideredduring the boundaryreview process, am anAsian working mom and first-generation immigrant. I am grateful to live and build my family in the beautiful and diversified Howard county. My daughterAlice hasbeen benefitedfrom ESOLprogram in theTriadelphia Ridge Elementary school, that helped her in greatdeal to overcome struggled language art hurdle and to boost socialization growth (Alice hasalways been the shyest girl in everygrade!). Socializationexists throughout one's lifetime, but the most lasting socialization occurs in one's childhood. No individual is immune to the reaction the others aroundthem. Schoolinfluences and modifiestheir behaviorat all phasesof the life course. I requestthe board of education members to promote more similar academic programs to the students from immigration families and low-income families. This is a life changing influence on die students. Analysisshows that high FARMS polygons, when assigned to schoolswith lowFARMS rate, do not improve school and students any better. I recommend voluntary economic integration programs, where both low-and higher-incomeparents may come together ina magnetschool or a charterschool. A voluntaryapproach, where students attend because of a mutual interest in a specific academic program or because they desire to experience ethnic or economic diversity, might yield some ofthe benefit of integration withoutthe negative side effects. In my opinion, integration cannot succeed where diversity is imposed from the top down, rather than being embraced by the very participants who are needed to make it work. Pag; (Reference: CATO Institute, Policy Analysis. The Problems with Economic Integration and Controlled Choice. By DavidJ. Armor. September 24, 2019. DavidJ. Armor is professor emeritus in the Schar School of Policy and Government at George Mason University.) Thank you a^ain the board of education members for listening and considering our suggestions! . -. -'"^ sm Resident of Walnut Grove Community Polygon 3176 10/23/2019 Pa.'e 6 Kathleen V. Hanks From: Lei Zhong Polveon 3176 Dear BOE members, My name is Lei Zhong and I have been a Howard County resident for 19 years. I'm writing to oppose Dr. Martirano's proposal, especially the part where my polygon 3176 will be moved to Wilde Lake High School. The reason for my opposition can't be simpler. River Hill High School is 1. 4 miles from my home and is still under capacity. In contrast, Wilde Lake is more than 4 times far away. This adds 30-50 minutes of bus time each school day, which is substantial for any high school students. . '', '':;;'"'.;t> l.r( .,nK' ^l-;>. iTH;, ;f, valueequity in education asmuch asyou do. thinkall disadvantaged students in ourcounty deserveto get additional help from the public school system. About two years ago, Mr. Martirano made some insightful comments on equity when he was interviewed by HCPSScommunication staff Brian Bassett. He talked about an early start, the 30 million word gap. He mentioned making use of school media center asa learning hub after school since not everyone has internet access at home. He mentioned watching out student attendance to prevent potential drop out. He also mentioned family influence and community support. They all made sense to me. However, swapping students is not the right approach. Overall, high schools in the eastern county are much more crowded than the western part. River Hill High, being under-capacity, should be able to absorb students from the east. Moving our students to Wilde Lake High adds substantial bus time, and is completely against policy 6010 guideline on solving overcapacity. In addition, it has serious safety, mental health, and financial implications. With HCPSS's significant budge issue, I would like to see the money on busing be applied directly to improve or add programs, or physical resource improvement. My son is currently in Folly Quarter MS. He's very interested in math and attended many competitions. Like earlier graduates from his school, he plans to teach math for free to middle schools once he's in high school. He has long noticed that certain schools are underrepresented in math competitions, so he decided to teach for such schools, instead of Folly Quarter. However, he's no longer sure if he could do that given the additional bus time to attend Wilde Lake High. I feel very sorry for him and those in need. Howard County high schoolers tend to have a very busy schedule. In the case of my son, he regularly plays piano and cello and competes for ClipperTeam at Columbia, and a county basketball team, whiletrying to maintain satisfactory grades in all classes. Between activities and school, he often does not have time to eat or even change clothes. So our minivan has become his second home. I can't imagine how he could keep his activities in high school. Five years ago, I moved from Ellicott City as the neighborhood Mt. Hebron became overcrowded. I thought I was doing the right thing to be near an under-capacity River Hill High. I value every school in this county and value every neighborhood in this county. My son has friends from all races and social-economic status, from sports, musical activities or school. He would have no problem attending any school. However, he does not want to spend extra time on the bus, because it takes away his opportunity to fulfill his full potential in school and extracurricular activities. Last but not least, as HCPSS budget issues are getting worse and potentially cutting some important programs like Technology and GT Music, even in a strong economy, I urge you to look at the huge cost associated with busing. Likea family, we haveto set priority and use every dollarwisely. Again, I'm not againstequity, however, I do believe there are much better solutions than Dr. Martirano's proposal to advance equity in HCPSS. Thankyou for listening to a fellow community member. Sincerely yours, Lei Zhong Dear BOE, On November 14, 2017, during a BOE Attendance Area Adjustment work session, Chair Vaillancourt announced " Mr. Kittleman did a press release today that the County has acquired a piece of property for the Turf Valley Elementary School so that we can push that one to be our Elementary School #43 which is scheduled to open 2023.' The Board made decisions based on this information and the fact that they had asked the OSP to split polygons during the next year. Just six months later in the 2018 Feasibility Study, the Turf Valley ES (North Region) was moved to ES # 44 to open in 2026 and the ES # 43 would be built in the Northeast Region in 2024. The 2024 utilization for the Northeast Region was projected to be 103. 9% and the North Region was projected to be 114. 2% - over 1 0% more! This makes no sense to move TVES to #44. The Turf Valley polygons were not split and we are back to the same situation of overcrowded schools in the Northern Regions and students getting pushed out oftheir community schools. I am writing to the BOEto request that OSPsplit the TurfValley polygons 304 and 305 into 4 or 5 polygons to give the Board tools to deal with the rapid housing growth in Turf Valley. There is capacity at Triadelphia Ridge Elementary School. Please split the Turf Valley polygons and make use ofTRES capacity. This will enable Manor Woods and West Friendship students to remain at their current schools and the established neighborhoods ofWaverly to remain at Waverly. Thank you for your consideration on this matter. Sangita Doshi POLYGON #232 Kathleen V. Hanks From: Jonathan Matz, MD Dear Board of Education, Now that the public testimony portion of the boundary review process is complete, and we're in the midst of your difficult work sessions, I'd like to share some well-written thoughts on redistricting that you might recognize. This writer emphasizes focusing on using targeted redistricting to address overcrowding with minimal disruption, drawing from community input and accurate data, plus consideration of alternative, specialized programs that have succeeded elsewhere. Here's a direct quote (emphasis added): "The most effective, least disruptive, way to address overcrowding is to build more schools. Now that a site has been chosen for high school #13, let's expedite the selection of a site in Elkridge for high school #14 and get serious about building both schools as soon as possible. Marriott's Ridge was built in 18 months so we know what's possible if the will exists. I'd want to blend the building of new schools with strategic redistricting that addressescurrent overcrowdingwhile anticipatingfuture growth. Any redistricting should be done in the most targeted and limited way possible to minimize disruption to students. I'd start with drawing the lines for HS#13, and then focus the more immediate redistricting on areas not slated to be moved to the new school, to ensure that the same neighborhoods are not moved twice. I would also have the redistricting apply beginning with the rising 9th graders, who will already be at a natural transition point, rather than disrupting kids already settled in their high schools The ideasabove noted, we do not haveenough data to make an informed decisionabout an appropriate plan of action. Community input is critical but it must be supplemented with data to back up any decisionswe make. Lastly, I'd encourage the Board to learn about efforts that have worked in other parts of the country to address overcrowding, as this problem is not unique to Howard County. For example, we might consider developing specialized academies in schools with excess capacity-e. g., around STEM, the arts, or coding-to draw interested students from overcrowded schools." This quote is directly from Board of Education member Sabina Taj's campaign web site published in mid 2018 (http://sabinataj. org/redistricting/). I believethis isa sensibleapproach to redistricting, and I truly hopethat Sabina Taj and the other members ofthe board will adhere to their campaign promises with regard to the boundary review process. Sincerely, Jonathan Matz, MD Polygon 129 Sent from Mail for Windows 10 October 23, 2019 Ken Frazer Polygon 1159 Dear Members of the Board of Education While Superintendent Martirano's presentation for the proposedArea Adjustment Planhighlighted several statistics from the proposed plan, I would like to point out several "other observations", many of which violate policy 6010. 1) The BOE supervisor's claims to provide "equity" among distribution of FARMs students, however the plan: a) Nearly doubles the amount of FARMs students atWaterloo Elementary (from 24% to 40%) andThunder Hill Elementary (from 21%to 37%), makingboth way above the county average 27%. b) SpecificaUy targets Clarksville ES to go from less than 5% to 17% FARMs. None of the other 6 ES that are less than 5% FARMs are affected. c) Specifically targets ClarksviUe MS to go from less than 5% to 13% FARMs. None of the oAer 4 MSwith FARMsless than 10% are affected. Glenwood MS FARMs ratio actually goes downby 1%. d) Creates additionalhardships on low income families whentheir children are busedto schools much further away (inhibits ability to participate in before/after school activities, reduced parental involvement, increased parental transportation burden). e) FARMs students moved awayfrom Tide 1 schools will losethe benefits provided by their current schools. 2) ELparticipation atWaterloo ESdoubles (8% to 16%), way above 7% county average. 3) Many elementary schools' capacity is made worse (5 ESwould growto overcapacity): . Bushy Park 82% to 117% . Laurel Woods 91% to 115% . Stevens Forest 109% to 112% . Thunder Hiss 100% to 111% . Veterans 103% to 112% 4) Murray Hill overcapacity (121%) is not addressed. . Ofthe 5 MS at overcapacity, only 1 is brought below capacity, but another (Bonnie Branch) is brought to overcapacity (99% to 111%). 5) Specificallydoes not address the impact of HS13 opening in 2 years,which will causechanges to distribution ofstudents among many ofthe easternand south eastern county highschools. 6) Atholton HS currently closely matches the county average for diversity of race, however the plan causesdrastic changeto the racialmix awayfrom the average. 7) Approximately 500 walkers will now be bus riders!! increased cost to taxpayers increased traffic * negative attect on the environment . affects smdents ability to participate in after-school activities 8) One quarter of the middle to highschool feeds are small (<15%). 9) Lots of cases of neighborhood fragmentation, communities divided and islands created: . Valley Meade (small slice of neighborhood polygons 1159 and 159 assigned to different ES, MS and HS). Side-by-side houses in neighborhood will have kids going to different sets of schools. . Fulton polygons 1256, 256 to Laurel Woods 10)Many instanceswhere smdents are swappedbetween schools (over 1900students affected). This results in extended bus routes, moving students further away from homes, inhibiting participation in before or after-school programs. Examples include: . Phelps LuckES andWaterloo ES (471 students affected) . Bryant Woods ES and Longfellow ES (117 students affected) . Harpers Choice MS and Clarksville MS (294 sudents affected) . Harpers Choice MS and Wilde Lake MS (79 students affected) . Burleigh Hanor MS and Mount View MS (160 students affected) . Thomas Viaduct MS and Elkridge Landing MS (168 students affected) . LakeElkhorn MS andHammond MS (281 students affected) . River Hill HS and Wilde Lake HS (334 students affected) The education gap exhibited by smdents from low income families is evident in the student data analysis that hasbeen performed over the past fewyears, andthe reduction in their graduation rates is cause for concern. However, the Superintendents plan to merely move/redistrict the FARMs smdents to distribute them more evenly among the schools does not address these students educational needs. Inf fact, that plan will likely causemore harm than good. In summary, I ask the BOE members to dutifully consider each of the proposed moves in the Superintendent's plan and weigh the consequences versus the claimed benefits. Sincerely, Ken Frazer Polygon 1159 10/23/2019 To the Howard County Board of Education, I live in Polygon 25; my children would be moved from Bollman Bridgeto Guilford Elementary and from Patuxtent Middle to Thomas Viaduct Middle under Dr. Martirano's plan. I already provided a written testimony previously, but, I did not include feedbackfrom my daughterand have since updated her about the possible change, so I would like to send you are thoughts regarding her havingto leave Bollman Bridge, a school she hasattended since Kindergarten. I was not goingto tell my children aboutthe possible change because I knew it would causethem a lot of stress and anxiety, but my daughterheard about it elsewhere and I felt it wasthe time to talk with her about it the possible changeand to gain heropinion. I did not give my opinion on the matter, as I wantedto stay positive for my daughter's sake, but I did update her about the differences in the schools (start and end times, locations, other peers thatwould possibly move with her, etc. ). It is notable that the group goingto Guilfordfrom Bollman Bridge would be very small, so she would not know many of the other kids movingwith her. I would also like to note that my son's feedbackwill not be included, as I have not updated him aboutthis possible change. He hassevere amounts of anxiety regardingany changedue to having been bullied in his previous school, and I did not wantto make his last year in a school that he loves full of stress and anxiety related to havingto move to anotherschool. Here is my daughter's testimony: 'I am a 3rdgrader at Bollman Bridge. My mom told me that I might begoing to a different school next year. I love goingto Bollman Bridge. There are so many nice kids and teachersthere. I have been there since Kindergarten. I love goingto see my old teachers and like my school. It would break up a lot of people's friendships and also would make it so I have less sleep from a longer bus ride. I won't know many people in a newschool becauseall of my good friends get to stay at Bollman Bridge. My mom told me that Guildford starts later then Bollman Bridge and that will be hard for me to go to because my parents have to be at work in the morning. I also don't want to go to a middle school that is far away; don't like riding busesfar. That's why I wantto stayat Bollman Bridge. I love my school!" Lastly, I would like to say that the reason I decided to send my daughter's feedback was due to a recent experience I had a local conference on the topic of Trauma. I attended a training on Self-Advocation for individuals with disabilities. The person providing the training had a physical disability and she said somethingthat wasvery relevantto the current situation with redistricting: shestated that she had attended a local elementary school as a child in which she knew everyone, attended with neighborhood friends and felt comfortable with the teachers but when the school board decided that she and other students with similar needs be bused to a school further awayto receive "better supports", she saidthe experience wasvery traumatizingfor her, largely because "nobodyasked my opinion. Thiswas supposed to help me, but it hurt me" I knowyou have heard some testimony from students, but think it is important that you make sure you hear from more students that would be affected by the changes that are being proposed; not just the ones whose parents have been made aware ofthis process and have the resources to testify/provide written testimony. I know many individuals in my community that are not aware of the possible changes to our polygon and I don't feel it is fair that their voices and those of their children are not heard during this process. Again, will state that do not agree with Dr. Matriano's plan and do not want Polygon 25 to move to different schools. Given our children might be zoned for the new high school, I would askthat you wait to move us until you are certain of the plan for the students attending the new high school; moving our Polygon now would mean that my children might have to attend 4 different schools in the next 4-5 years and I think that would be detrimental to their emotional and socialfunctioning, whichwould then affect their academic performance. I have included more detailed reasoning in my previous testimony as well. Thankyou for your time! knowthat this process hasbeen very stressful forall ofyou and I appreciate the time and care you have taken in attending all of the parent feedback sessions and reading everyone's written testimony. Sincerely, Catherine Conley Polygon 25 Feedback on the first BOE Work Session & Testimony Requesting to Keep Pointers Run Polygons 64, 1064, 129, 1129 Together in Neighborhood Schools Dear Board of Education Members: I am writing as a member of the larger Pointers United community (Polygons 64, 1064, 129, and 1129) to offer some feedback on the first BOE Work Session. I agree with the Board's decision at the October 17th meeting to start the redistricting process using the current school boundaries instead of the Superintendent's plan. I also agree with the data driven approach to redistricting and appreciate the Board asking for the most up-to-date 2019 attendance data to use in this process. Finally, I ask that the Board minimize student moves at the present time. We should focus on solving emergency capacity and overutilization problems now, but wait for a larger redistricting when High School 13 is ready to open The Board should take time to engage the community and study more thoughtful and impactful ways to improve equity that do not involve the harmful impacts of reshuffling 7, 396 students. Patience in redistricting will allow for more accurate attendance data and more informed decisions for comprehensive redistricting. I would also like to share my thoughts about the importance of neighborhood continuity. You will likely hear similar testimony from many concerned families like ours. During the previous 2017-2018 redistricting process, our Neighborhood of Pointers Run within the Village of River Hill asked the board to keep Polygons 64, 1064, 129, and 1129 together in one of our community schools. I thank the board for listening to our concerns at that time and for keeping our neighborhood intact. In this round of redistricting, I wanted to provide you with some additional geographic information about our community. This information should clearly support our request to keep our neighborhood together in one of our local village schools, either Pointers Run Elementary or Clarksville Elementary. Our polygons are on the north side of Route 32 and a neighborhood in every sense of the word. We have trails connecting the streets and cul-de-sacs. There are no major roads, stoplights, or features separating us. Ifyou were to walk through our neighborhood you would have no idea that you just crossed from one po ygon into another. Our children walk safely throughout this area along sidewalks and trails without crossing a major road. Looking to our broader community, the polygons immediately south of Route 32 (Polygons 190, 1190, and 128) are also part of our larger Pointers Run neighborhood. We are easily able to walk to that part of the neighborhood via the connecting paths and sidewalks. There are strong ties between families that live on either side of Route 32. Further, we are also connected to the Pheasant Ridge section of River Hill by sidewalks and pathways (polygons 295, 186, 1186, 188, 1188, 28, 2028, and 1028). We consider this entire area our neighborhood. We share the River hlill Pool and the River Hill Village Center, and we all participate in our beloved Village of River Hill 4th of July parade. This is the geographical and community information that should be considered when making decisions about redistricting. The map at the bottom of this letter is offered as an illustration. To solve the overcrowding and utilization/capacity problem, one natural way to divide the Village of River Hill is to use Route 32 as a boundary, sending our polygons of 64, 1064, 129, and 1129 to Clarksville Elementary School with our adjacent neighbors. As proposed, the Feasibility Study would split up our four contiguous polygons, sending next door neighbors to different schools. As proposed, the Superintendent's plan would send our four contiguous polygons outside of our village to Swansfield Elementary School. To travel there, our students would need to pass entirely through the Village of Hickory Ridge to reach the Village of Harper's Choice. This includes the major traffic lights of: Cedar Lane/Grace Drive, Cedar Lane/Freetown Road, Cedar Lane/Owen Brown Road, and the high traffic intersections of Cedar Lane/Hickory Ridge Road and Cedar Lane/Little Patuxent Parkway (and the entrances to the Howard County General Hospital and adjacent medical buildings). This route is clearly not contiguous to our neighborhood, nor is it walkable or bikeable for adults, let alone elementary school children. In addition, the Middle Patuxent Environmental Area acts as a natural boundary separating the Village of River Hill and the Village of Harpers Choice. With no connecting roads within this protected nature preserve, travel times between the villages are inherently longer. The increased time and busier routes will make it harder for families to participate in school-based activities, weakening the sense of community. While I applaud the Superintendent's focus on equity and believe this is a founding ideal of Columbia, this round of redistricting was triggered by the immediate problem of overcapacity and utilization per Policy 6010. As proposed, the Superintendent's plan would only reduce the number of elementary schools that exceed 110% capacity from 21 to 16 and leave 5 elementary schools below 90% capacity, suggesting that another round of elementary school redistricting is on the immediate horizon. I hope that the Board decides on a plan that serves as a longer term fix to capacity and overutilization and focuses on the feedback from the community input sessions that listed consistent feeds, contiguous communities, and minimizing transportation time as the three most important standards for consideration. In sum, our village is fortunate to have two neighborhood schools, Pointers Run Elementary and Clarksville Elementary. With respect to neighborhood continuity, both the Superintendent's Plan (which sends our students to school two villages away) and the Feasibility Study (which sends next door neighbors to different schools) fail our community. The board has options for us and I ask that you considerthem fully. Policy 6010 has competing objectives, but the authors of this policy were wise to stress neighborhood continuity. I ask, and I believe all cor"munities will ask, to please prioritize keeping neighborhoods together during redistricting. Sincerely, Dara Neuman-Sunshine River Run Polygon 1064 Annotated Map of Point^^ Run and Adjacdfnt Potysons and Wtages Datafrom: bttps^/data.howardlcouFttyrtKf.gov/MapGsOwY.html Middle Patuxent Legend Environmentat Area i Columbia Village NAME 1108 - "IES Columbia Non-Village Dorsey's Search Harper's Choice '^*CE$ 'ass. Hickory Ridge tf K:'~i Kings Contrivance ;;.( Long Reach Oakland Mills Owen Brown River Hill Town Center 108, Wilde Lake ^; w . 32 v ; ;. <: Major Roads . flssi PRES ^ Village Center Kathleen V. Hanks From: [email protected] Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2019 5:1 1 PM To: Hcpss Redistricting Subject: [External] Split polygons 304 and 305 Dear Board members and Dr. Martirano, I paidclose attention duringthe 2017redistricting andultimately, my polygonwas moved. During all ofthe work sessions, splitting ofpolygons in the turf valley area was discussed, and in the end, OSP did'not look into e are a similar situation now and my kids are on the chopping block to be moved again, in large part due to all ofthe housing planned inpolygons 304 and305. Pleaseadvise and request thatthe work beput into splitting polygons 304 and 305 so that there are more options to relieve overcrowding. Please do this in particular to avoidmoving the samechildren multiple times. I've attachedbelow a letter submitted by a fellow parent at my children's new school- West Friendship. Sincerely, Jennifer Gallagher Dear Dr. Martirano, I re-watched the AAA BOB work sessions from 2017. I appreciate that the videos were available online. Every single meeting the BOB discussed the splitting ofpolygons. Inparticular, polygons that have expected high student emollment dueto newhousing developments. This wasdiscussed for over anhour attimes. It is very apparent in these meetings that the splitting ofpolygons was a high priority with the Board, there is no missing it in these videos. The Board chair asked OSP to split Turf Valley polygons 304 & 305 so they would have a tool to deal with the rapid new growth in that area. I have attached a few ofthe BOBwork sessions videos where this wasdiscussed. I only pulled out a few,there areplenty ofother discussionsduring these work sessions. Pleasewatch these excerpts. Watchingthe work sessions, thereis a theme. TheBOE wants polygons to be split, OSPdoesn't wantto do it. Infact, OSPkeeps holding off doing it andit endsup a weekbefore decisions need to bemade that OSP says there isn't enough time to get it done. OSPhas had two years since the last redistricting to splitpolygons 304 and 305. I amrespectfully asking you to haveyou- team get this done for the current work sessions so the BOB have the tools fhey need to effectively achieve their goals in this redistricting. Whetherthe Board decides to move the polygons to differentschools will be the BOE's decision, but they need the tools to be able to consider this. I understand that this can be tricky, but Office of School Planning should be enthused about creating tools to help the "Planning" ofwhere students can legitimately fit into a school and not continuously push for status quo. I suggest looking at it 3 different ways to see how to get this to work, where #1 is the ideal situation: 1) Split between housing units with current students vs. housing units currently being built or in the pipeline 2) Forpolygon 3 04 -split betweenhousing units that werebuilt prior to 6/2018 andunits built after 6/2018 or in the pipeline (this way ifBOE decides to make moves, students that moved in after 6/2018 had never been redistricted). Polygon 305 was not moved in the 2017 redistricting. 3) Split polygons 304 and 305 however best makes sense, whether students are ciirrently there are not Beingproactive andgetting these scenarios donewith the anticipationof the Board askingfor this will only help our school system. Pleaselet me knowif you have anyquestions. I canmeet withyou sometime this weekto discussfurther. Thankyou for your inunediate attention to this request. I will send another email with some more videos (they were too big to fit on one email) Sent from my iPhone Dear Board of Education, I attended the first work session and was a bit dismayed by the slow progress, but I truly appreciated the efforts of a couple of board members whowere fightingfor better data. It seemed like the Superintendent's staff was putting up a lotof resistance to providing data to the board. I would encourage board members to continue to insistthat the information be provided. In orderto makethe best decisions, the board should use the most current information available. It is not unreasonable to ask for and receive the most current enrollment data or transportation or whatever other data will result in making informed decisions. Although my children will not reach high school for many many years, I applaud the decision to allow juniors and seniors to stay at their current school. I also applaud the decision to not make it an unfunded mandate. Providing transportation to those who need it is the only way to make that an equitabledecision. Thisdecision shows that you careabout the future ofour children. I encourageyou to maintain that dedicationto consideringthe needsof our students throughout the process. I understand the reason for starting your work at the HS level. It makes sense to make boundaries based on the future HS13 aswell. I strongly encourage you to look at the feeds all the waythrough the system. Thefeed system here isunlike any I haveever experienced previously and is proneto causing unnecessary disruptions to the social stability of our students as they move through the system. encourage you to make a feed system that keeps kids in neighborhood schools, keeps walkers as walkers, and makes for long-term social stability for our children. My oldest child is in second grade and this is our second time through a redistricting process. That should NOTbe the norm. Ifyou insist on doing a massive redistricting this year, I encourage you to plan for the future using the best available data so that my children need not endure redistricting every 2-3 years. The goal should be to redistrict as infrequently as possible. Sincerely, Angela McMellen Brannigan Polygon 64 Dear Board of Education, Nowthat the publictestimony portion ofthe boundary review process is complete, andwe're in the midst ofyour difficult work sessions, I'd like to sharesome well-written thoughts on redistricting that you might recognize. This writer emphasizes focusing on usingtargeted redistricting to address overcrowding with minimal disruption, drawing from community input and accurate data, plus consideration of alternative, specialized programs that have succeeded elsewhere. Here's a direct quote (emphasis added): The most effective, least disruptive, way to address overcrowding is to build more schools. Nowthat a site has been chosen for high school #13, let's expeditethe selection of a site in Elkridgefor highschool #14 and get serious about building both schools as soon as possible. Marriott's Ridge was built in 18 months so we know what's possible ifthe will exists. I'd want to blend the building of new schools with strategic redistricting that addresses current overcrowding while anticipating future growth. Any redistricting should be done in the most targeted and limited way possible to minimize disruption to students. I'd start with drawing the lines for HS #13, and then focus the more immediate redistricting on areas not slated to be moved to the new school, to ensure that the same neighborhoods are not moved twice. I would also have the redistricting apply beginning with the rising 9th graders, who will already be at a natural transition point, ratherthan disrupting kids alreadysettled in their highschools The ideas above noted, we do not have enough data to make an informed decision about an appropriate plan of action. Community input is critical but it must be supplemented with data to back up any decisions we make. Lastly, I'dencourage the Boardto learn about efforts that haveworked in other parts of the country to address overcrowding, asthis problem is not unique to Howard County. For example, we might consider developing specialized academies in schools with excess capacity-e. g., around STEM, the arts, or coding-to draw interested students from overcrowded schools." This quote is directly from Board of Education member SabinaTaj's campaign web site published in mid 2018 (http://sabinataj. org/redistricting/). I believe this is a sensible approach to redistricting, and I truly hope that Sabina Taj and the other members of the board will adhereto their campaign promises with regard to the boundary review process. Sincerely, Angela McMellen Brannigan Polygon 64 Dear Board of Education, Now that the public testimony portion of the boundary review process is complete, and we're in the midst ofyour difficult work sessions, I'd like to sharesome well-written thoughts on redistricting that you might recognize.This writer emphasizesfocusing on usingtargeted redistricting to address overcrowding with minimal disruption, drawing from community input and accurate data, plus consideration of alternative, specialized programs that have succeeded elsewhere. Here's a direct quote: The most effective, least disruptive, way to address overcrowding is to build more schools. Now that a site has been chosen for high school #13, let's expedite the selection of a site in Elkridge for high school #14 and get serious about building both schools as soon as possible. Marriott's Ridge was built in 18 months so we know what's possible if the will exists. I'd want to blend the building of new schools with strategic redistricting that addressescurrent overcrowding whileanticipating future growth. Any redistricting should be done in the most targeted and limited way possible to minimize disruption to students. I'd start with drawing the lines for HS#13, and then focus the more immediate redistricting on areas not slated to be moved to the new school, to ensure that the same neighborhoods are not moved twice. I would also have the redistricting apply beginning with the rising 9th graders, who will already be at a natural transition point, ratherthan disrupting kids alreadysettled in their highschools The ideas above noted, we do not have enough data to make an informed decision about an appropriate plan of action. Community input is critical but it must be supplemented with data to back up any decisions we make. Lastly, I'd encourage the Board to learn about efforts that have worked in other parts of the country to addressovercrowding, asthis problem is not uniqueto Howard County. For example, we might consider developing specialized academies in schools with excess capacity-e.g., around STEM, the arts, or coding-to draw interested students from overcrowded schools." This quote is directly from Board of Education member Sabina Taj's campaign web site published in mid 2018 (http://sabinataj. org/redlstricting/). I believe this is a sensible approach to redistricting, and I truly hope that Sabina Taj and the other members of the board will adhere to their campaign promises with regard to the boundary review process. Sincerely, Rachel Gelinas Polygon 64 Howard County School Board Re: Redistricting In the State of Maryland, a turtle taken from the wild may only be released if they have been held in their new home for less than 30 days. Students deserve more consideration. Virtually no students want to leave their schools, for better or worse. I believe the Superintendent has exceeded his mandate. The problem with overcrowding in our schools is real and must be solved through redistricting; some students must move. But, there has been no groundswell of support askingthe school system to alter the social dynamics within our county. People choose to live wherethey do as a result of their own circumstances. Developers develop based on their own choices, within the rules set by the county. In time, we can hope the social dynamics and associated prejudices in our community evolve for the better. I am not sure Howard County schools shouldjump into the fray. We should redistrictto reduce overcrowding. If the powers that be want to bury a little bit of social engineering in their plan, so be it. Schools that do not have the resources to cope with the needs of their students should receive more and better resources from the county - at the expense of schools that are better off. I am sure the parents affiliated with these well off schools will offer you wholehearted support..... from a distance. Fred Johnson Polygon 271 ^^_ RECEIVED OCT 2 71'9 Howard County Board of Education 1091 OCIarksville Pike Ellicott City, MD 20142 Dear Chairwoman Ellis and Members of the Howard County Board of Education, My name is Erica Murakami and I am a parent of a Howard County student who attend school in Clarksville. Even though my childwill not be directly affected by the current redistricting plan in discussion, as a Howard County resident I would like to address my point of view. It is clear that there are two very distinguished group of people, one clearly favorable to the current presented redistricting plan, and another very oppositional. Due to the amount of reasoning that has being presented to justify the redistricting so far, I don't see base to be supportive to the plan. It looks more like a called "ban-aid" temporary solution, and not a serious long-term structural solution. I am afraid of the psychological damage on the kids will affect the community andwill possibly provoke evasion ofthe people that bringswealth to the county. As you know, after Potomac and Bethesda area, Howard County is the next poll of attraction of wealth in the state, and if the schools performance go down, it will affect our county economy. To those whoare in support ofthe redistricting plan and who believe thatthe ones standing against it do so becauseof racial or socio-economical reason, I would say that it is not. I believe that most of us that chose to live in this area are pretty open minded and embrace diversity. What I believe that affects the different level ofschools performances in our community is the level of priority that families give to education. Those whoestablished residence in areas attended by the higherperforming schools most likely chose the area because of the schools. Not that those in less privileged areas don't prioritize education, but they may still have other prior concerns and priorities, whether it's to be geographically located to reduce commute times, or to be closer to family, whateverit is, each one has their own reason to choose the place to live. Those in "magnetic" areas often even had considered private schools, but not everyone can affordtheir high cost. So, I believe that this explainswhat pulls some schools to higher levels in terms of academic achievement and others not. Some even come from abroad to ensure their children are going to specific school, I know for me this was true. We moved from a third world country and did extensive research to locate a community where the schools were strong and we believed our daughters would flourish. Many argue that this is a budgetary movement, but if the government has the resources to pay twice the current busing cost, why not use it to improve the infrastructure of less advantaged schools? Why will increase risks moving them through longer routes and increase liability? I see that some schools even lack a decent air conditioning system. Ifthe county would fightto get more resources to invest in education, building more units to address the over crowed, strength the infra structure of the existing schools, create professionalization programs or personal counseling, then it would be a long term investment and would have, I believe, full support of the community. History has proven that forced moving generates anxiety and even rejection for both, the least favored children in a more "privileged" pushy school and the children from better-off schools taken to "less privileged" schools. Ifthe current plan goes through, I am afraidwe will see a rise in bullying, isolation and drug use. In my personal and non-professional opinion, Howard County is a too large ofa community to make lab test to see if it works or not. In the meantime, we might be ultimately sacrificing an entire generation of children. And later, to turn back, it would be very stressful again. Sincerely, Erica S. Murakami Polygon 186 Resent on October 23, 2019 Dear Board of Education, Nowthat the public testimony portion of the boundary review process is complete, and we're in the midst ofyour difficult work sessions, I'd like to sharesome well-written thoughts on redistricting that you might recognize. This writer emphasizesfocusing on usingtargeted redistricting to addressovercrowding with minimal disruption, drawingfrom community input and accurate data, plus consideration of alternative, specialized programs that have succeeded elsewhere. Here's a direct quote (emphasis added): The most effective, least disruptive, way to address overcrowding is to build more schools. Nowthat a site has been chosen for high school #13, let's expedite the selection of a site in Elkridge for high school #14 and get serious about building both schools as soon as possible. Marriott's Ridge was built in 18 months so we know what's possible if the will exists. I'd want to blend the building of new schools with strategic redistricting that addresses current overcrowding while anticipating future growth. Any redistricting should be done in the most targeted and limited way possible to minimize disruption to students. I'd start with drawingthe lines for HS#13, and then focus the more immediate redistricting on areas not slated to be moved to the new school, to ensure that the same neighborhoods are not moved twice. I would also have the redistricting apply beginning with the rising 9th graders, who will already be at a natural transition point, rather than disrupting kids already settled in their high schools The ideas above noted, we do not have enough data to make an informed decision about an appropriate plan of action. Community input is critical but it must be supplemented with data to back up any decisions we make. Lastly, I'd encouragethe Board to learn about efforts that haveworked in other parts of the country to address overcrowding, as this problem is not unique to Howard County. For example, we might consider developing specialized academies in schools with excess capacity-e.g., around STEM, the arts, or coding-to draw interested students from overcrowded schools." This quote is directly from Board of Education member SabinaTaj's campaign web site published in mid 2018 (http://sabinataj. org/redistricting/). I believe this is a sensible approach to redistricting, and I truly hope that Sabina Taj and the other members of the board will adhere to their campaign promises with regard to the boundary review process. Sincerely, Anna Nemirovsky Polygon #159