VOL. 4 Public Disclosure Authorized

HESCO 6Ih STG and ELR Project (2006-07) Resettlement Plan Addendum

Ref.: FRTO~VO~HES-ADDENDU~M-RP Public Disclosure Authorized

December 2007

Prepared for Hyderabad Electric Supply Company Limited (HESCO) Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized ~lanPartners (Pvt.) Ltd.

Suite 4, 1st Floor, 20-8 Blair Center, G-8 Markaz, Islamabad Tel.: +92 (51) 225 3696-97 Fax: +92 (51) 225 3698 Email: [email protected]

Report disclaimer: Elan Partners has prepared this document in accordance with the instructions Of Hyderabad Electric Supply Company Limited (HESCO) for its sole and specific use. Any other persons, companies, or institutions who use any information contained herein do so at their own risk. HESCO 61h STG and ELR Project (2006-07) Resettlement Plan - Addendum

Executive Summary

The Hyderabad Electric Supply Company (HESCO) is planning to undertake the 6'h Secondary Transmission and Grid (STG) project in various parts of its territory. HESCO is seeking financing from the World Bank (WB) for this 5-year project. In line with the prevailing legislation in the country and WB safeguard policies, an environmental and social assessment (ESA) of the project was carried out, and its report developed in July 2007. A resettlement plan (RP) was also developed to address the involuntary resettlement issues likely to be caused by the project.

Subsequently, HESCO revised the scope of the 6thSTG project and also added the Energy Loss Reduction (ELR) components in it, for which an additional environmental and social assessment was carried out, and an addendum of the original @SA report developed. In order to address the resettlement issues associated with the additional scope of the proposed project, an addendum to RP has also been prepared, in accordance with the WB Operational Policies. This document presents the RP Addendum for the proposed project, and should be read in conjunction with the main RP.

Policy and Legal Framework The RP has been developed in accordance with the WB Operational Policy 4.12 (OP4.12), which specifies the procedure that needs to be followed to address the involuntary resettlement the Bank-financed project would cause.

In addition, the WB OP 4.01 requires that environmental and social assessment be carried out before commencing projects such as the 6th STG. The Pakistan Environmental Protection Act, 1997 (PEPA 1997) requires the proponentq of every development project in the country to conduct an environmental' assessment and submit its report to the relevant environmental protection agency. The ESA study mentioned above has been conducted in response to OP 4.01 and PEPA 1997.

Project Overview

The overall objective of the 6th STG and ELR project is to help increase the efficiency, reliability and quality of the electricity supply. The project seeks to decrease the technical as well as commercial losses, increase the electricity availability, and improve the voltage profile, within the HESCO's electricity network.

The 6'h STG is a 5-year project, from 2006-7 to 20010-11, and has been broken down in five distinct year-wise phases. The STG components consist of establishing new grid stations, extendinglupgradinglaugmentinglrehabilitating existing grid stations, laying new transmission lines and rehabilitating existing transmission lines. The ELR cohponents, to be implemented during the year 2006-07 only, comprise of rehabilitationlbifurcation of

- 1 'Environment' mentioned here includes physical, biological, social and human environment, as defined in the Act.

iii December 2007 FRT07V04HES-Agdendum-RP Executive Summary HESCO 6'h STG and ELR Project (2006-07) Resettlement Plan - Addendum

HT feeders, installation of energy meters on distribution transformers, installation of insulated aerial bundled cables for LT feeders and replacing energy meters for the consumers.

A major portion of the STG project for the year 2006-07 was covered under the original ESA study and the associated resetilement issues covered under the original RP, whereas the remaining parts of the STG and entire ELR component for the year 2006-07 has been covered under the present study and documented in this Addendum.

Stakeholder Consultation Stakeholder consultations were carried out as part of the original ESA as well as the present study for the additional project scope, covering the STG and the ELR works. These consultations were conducted with the institutional as well as the grassroots stakeholders. It was ensured that the rural women were also included during these consultations. The main objectives of the consultations were to: apprise the stakeholders about the proposed project activities; obtain their views, concerns and recommendations; and addresslincorporate them in the project design - thus enhancing the environmental and social performance of the project.

The consultations carried out during the present study focused the communities that are likely to be affected by the ELR works in the Hyderabad and Mirpur Khas cities.

Key Socioeco~iorr~icIssues STG Works: The key socioeconomic issues associated with the STG works identified during the present study were essentially similar to the ones included in the original ESA. These included:

H Involuntary resettlement issues (damage to crops)

H Safety hazards and public health concerns m Aesthetic value

H Blocked access routes

Noise and vibration

H Damage to infrastructure

H Gender issues

H Social issues, and

H Impacts on sites of archeological, historical, cultural or religious significance. The ESA has recommended mitigation measures to minimize if not completely eliminate the above concerns associated with the project. The present RP is one of the outcomes of the ESA study. ELR Works: The key socioeconomic issues associated with the ELR works included public nuisance and safety of the population near the work sites. Appropriate mitigation and housekeeping measures have been proposed in the present ESA to address these concerns.

iv December 2007 FRTON04HES-Addendum-RP Executive Summary HESCO 61h STG and ELR Project (2006-07) Resettlement Plan - Addendum

Resettlement Plan The original ESA identified the number of project affectees to be more than 200 hence the RP was developed in keeping with OP 4.12. The RP addressed the involuntary resettlement issues likely to arise during the proposed project. The RP provided an entitlement framework, implementation procedure, institutional arrangement, monitoring requirements and grievance redressal mechanism.

The present document provides the addendum to the original RP, and addresses the involuntary resettlement aspects of the additional project scope discussed above. The present RP addresses the crop damage caused by the transmission line rehabilitation works. No other project activity is likely to cause any involuntary resettlement.

Resettlement Budget The cost of RP-Addendum implementation is included in the overall environmental and socioeconomic management budget of the proposed project. The total amount of this budget is about Rs.7.4million, of which about Rs.3.8million is for the crop compensation. This amount is in addition to the one which is provided in the original ESA report and RP.

December 2007 FRT07V04HES-Addendum-RP HESCO 6thSTG and ELR Project (2006-07) Resettlement Plan -Addendum

E A Environmental assessment ELR Energy Loss Reduction ESA Environmental and Social Assessment ESC Environmental and Social Cell ES I Environmental and Social Inspector ESM Environmental and Social Monitor ESMP Environmental and Social Management Plan GRM Grievance Redressal Mechanism GSC Grid Station Construction (Department) GSO Grid Station Operation (Department) GS Grid Station HESCO Hyderabad Electric Supply Company HT High tension IEE Initial Environmental Examination KV Kilo volts Kwh Kilo watt hour LAA Land Acquisition Act (of 1894) LT Low tension MVA Mega volt amperes M&E Monitoring and Evaluation NGO Non Governmental Organization OP Operational Policy O&M Operation and Maintenance PAPS Project affected persons PCB Poly Chlorinated Biphenyl PD Project Director PEPA Pakistan Environmental Protection Act PM Project Manager RE Resident Engineer ROW Right of Way RP Resettlement Plan SCR Social Complaint Register STG Secondary transmission and grid TL Transmission line TOR Terms of Reference WAPDA Water and Power Development Authority WB World Bank

December 2007 FRTON04HES-Addendum-RP HESCO 6Ih STG and ELR Project (2006-07) Resettlement Plan . Addendum

... Executive Summary ...... III

Acronyms ...... vi

1 Introduction ...... 1-1 1. 1 Project Overview...... 1-1 1.2 ESA Study and Resettlement Plan ...... 1 -2

2 Description of the Project ...... 2-1 2.1 Project Objectives ...... 2 -1 2.2 Project Components ...... 2 -1 2.3 Construction Activities ...... 2 -2 2.4 Operation and Maintenance Activities ...... 2 -5

3 Stakeholder Consultations ...... 3-1 3.1 Objectives...... 3 -1 3.2 Stakeholder Identification and Analysis ...... 3 -1 3.3 Stakeholder Consultations during Original ESA ...... 3 -2 3.4 Stakeholders Consultations for Additional Project Scope ...... 3-2

4 Key Socioeconomic and Resettlement Issues ...... 4-1 4.1 Socioeconomic Impacts during Design Phase ...... 4-1 4.2 Socioeconomic lmpacts and Mitigation during Construction Phase ...... 4-2 4.3 Affected Persons and Assets ...... 4-5

5 Resettlement Budget ...... 5-1

Appendix A: Field Data (Details of Stakeholder Consultations; and Details of the Crop Compensation . details of affected cultivated land under the transmission lines. estimates of crop compensation and list of affected land owners)

vii December 2007 FRTON04HES-Addendum-RP HESCO 6Ih STG and ELR Project (2006-07) Resettlement Plan . Addendum

List of Exhibits

Exhibit 2.1. Project Components ...... 2-8 Exhibit 4.1: Summary of CroplTree Compensation ...... 4-6 Exhibit 5.1. Cost of Environmental and Social Management...... 5-2

viii December 2007 FRTON04HES-Addendum-RP HESCO 6thSTG and ELR Project (2006-07) Resettlement Plan - Addendum

1 Introduction

The Hyderabad Electric Supply Company (HESCO) is planning to undertake the 6thSecondary Transmission and Grid (STG) project in various parts of its territory. HESCO is seeking financing from the World Bank (WB) for this 5-year project. In line with the prevailing legislation in the country and WB safeguard policies, an environmental and social assessment (ESA) of the project was carried out, and its report developed in July 2007. A resettlement plan (RP) was also developed to address the involuntary resettlement issues likely to be caused by the project.

Subsequently, HESCO revised the scope of the 6thSTG project and also added the Energy Loss Reduction (ELR) components in it, for which additional fieldwork, and environmental and social assessment were carried out, and an addendum of the original ESA report developed. In order to address the resettlement issues associated with the additional scope of the proposed project, an addendum to RP has also been prepared, in accordance with the WB Operational Policies. This document presents the RP Addendum for the proposed project, and should be read in conjunction with the main RP.

1 .I Project Overview The overall objective of the 6th STG and ELR project is to help increase the efficiency, reliability and quality of the electricity supply. The project seeks to decrease the technical as well as commercial losses, increase the electricity availability, and improve the voltage profile, within the HESCO's electricity network. The 6thSTG is a 5-year project, from 2006-7 to 20010 -1 12, and has been broken down in five distinct year-wise phases. The STG components consist of establishing new grid stations, extendinglupgradinglaugmentinglrehabilitating existing grid stations, llaying new transmission lines and rehabilitating existing transmission lines. The ELR copponents, to be implemented during the year 2006-07 only, comprise of rehabilitationlbifurcation of HT feeders, installation of energy meters on distribution transformers, insljallation of insulated aerial bundled cables for LT feeders and replacing energy meters for the consumers. The key components of these phases, as given in the Project Description Document (PDD), are tabulated below.3

STG New Grid Stations 4 2 4 3 2 15 (GS) (numbers)

The original PC1 was prepared for the project duration from 2003-04 to 2007-08. The original year-wise distribution of work within the total project duration as given in the PC1 has subsequently been revised, based upon changing load demand and priorities.

1-1 December 2007 FRT07V04HES-Addendum-RP Policy and Legal Framework HESCO 6'h STG and ELR Project (2006-07) Resettlement Plan - Addendum

2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010 -11 Total GS Conversion 4 1 0 0 2 7 (numbers) ...... - ...... -...... -.--. GS Augmentation (numbers) GS Extensiy (numbers) Rehabilitation of 60 50 52 26 28 21 6 GS (numbers) New Transmission 111 170 130 27 13 451 Lines (km) Rehabilitation of Transmission 868 686 629 586 21 1 2,980 Lines (km) ...-...... " ...... ELR Rehabilitation and bifurcation of 11 kV feeders 57 57 (numbers) Installation of meters on 200 and 100 kVA 1,134 distribution 1,134 transformers (numbers) ...... -...... Installation of aerial bundled 91 9 cables for LT feeders (km) ...... -. .- -...- .- -- .-. - ...... - - -. Replacement of conventional 130,693 - 130,693 meters (numbers)

A major portion of the STG project for the year 2006-07 was covered under the original ESA study, whereas the remaining parts of the STG and entire ELR component for the year 2006-07 has been covered under the present study and documented in ESA- Addendum (see study scope in Section 1.2.3 below).

HESCO is seeking the WB financing for the first three years of the project.

1.2 ESA Study and Resettlement Plan The RP is one of the outcomes of the ESA study, and addresses some of the most significant adverse impacts of the proposed project. In this section, need of the entire study, its scope and methodology are presented.

The project scope has been revised after conducting the original ESA.

December 2007 FRTON04HES-Addendum-RP Policy and Legal Framework HESCO 6Ih STG and ELR Project (2006-07) Resettlement Plan - Addendum

1.2.1 Need of the Study The OP 4.12 (further discussed in Chapter 2) requires that an RP is developed if the project affectees are likely to be more than 200. In addition, the World Bank Operational Policy 4.01 (OP 4.01) states that "The Bank requires environmental assessment (EA) of projects proposed for sank financing to help ensure that they are environmentally sound and sustainable, and thus to improve decision making" 5. Furthermore, the Pakistan Environmental Protection Act, 1997 (PEPA 1997) requires the proponents of every development project in the country to submit either an Initial Environmental Examination (IEE) or "where the project is likely to cause an adverse environmental effect," an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) to the concerned environmental protection agency (EPA). The IEEIEIA Regulations 2000 issued under the PEPA 1997 provide separate lists for the projects requiring IEE and EIA.

The ESA study (ESA report provided under separate cover) has been conducted in response to OP 4.01 and PEPA 1997.

1.2.2 Study Objectives ESA Study The objectives of the ESA were:

To assess the existing environmental and socioeconomic conditions of the project area, To identify likely impacts of the proposed project on the natural, human and social environment of the area, to predict and evaluate these impacts, and determine significance of these impacts, in light of the technical and regulatory concerns, To propose appropriate mitigation measures that should be incorporated in the design of the project to minimize if not eliminate the adverse impacts, To assess the compliance status of the proposed activities with respect to the environmental legislation and WB's Operational Policies,

D To develop an environmental management plan (ESMP) to provide an implementation mechanism for the environmental as well as social mitigation measures identified during the study. Resettlement Plan Based upon the outcome of the ESA study, the RP was developed as one of the social mitigation measures. The objectives of the RP were:

To provide an entitlement framework for the project affectees - project affected persons (PAPs), m To assess the type and magnitude of resettlement,

m To identify the PAPs,

5 Excerpts from WB OP4.01 - Environmental Assessment. January, 1999.

December 2007 FRT07V04HES-Addendum-RP Policy and Legal Framework HESCD 6Ih STG and ELR Project (2006-07) Resettlement Plan - Addendum

m To define institutional and implementation arrangements, To define the monitoring and evaluation requirements, To provide the cost estimates for the RP implementation.

The present Addendum to RP addresses the involuntary resettlement aspects of the additional project scope (see Section 1.2.3 below).

1.2.3 Study Scope Original Scope

The original ESA study and RP covered the following components of the proposed €ithSTG project which would be carried out during the year 2006-07:

New grid stations: 4 (Larkana Ill, Chamber, Bukhshapur , and Tando Bago) Grid station extension: 1 I (Nooriabad) Grid station conversion: : 4 (Matiari, Kandiari, Samaro and I Naukot) New transmission lines: / Ill km...... , . ,,, ..,., -.

Additional Scope

The present RP-Addendum covers the remaining components of the STG and ELR project to be carried out during the year 2006-07. These are given below.

STG Grid station extension: 1 2 (Humayun and Jacobabad) Grid station augmentation: 1 4 (Kot Diji, Hyderabad-Phuleli, i; Naushehro Feroze and Umer Kot) Grid station rehabilitation: / 60

Transmission line rehabilitation: i 868 km ELR Rehabilitationlbifurcation of 1 11 kV feeders: 1 57 i Installation of meters on distribution transformers: ) 1,134 Installation of aerial bundled i cables for LT feeders ( 919km Replacement of conventional 1 meters: ( 130,693

1- 4 December 2007 FRTON04HES-Addendum-RP Policy and Legal Framework HESCO 6'h STG and ELR Project (2006-07) Resettlement Plan - Addendum

The original and additional scope combined constitutes the entire 6'h STG and ELR project (2006-07), as given in Section 1.1 above.

1.2.4 RP Addendum

As described earlier, the present RP-Addendum addresses the additional scope of the 6thSTG and ELR project given in Section 1.2.3 above, and is to be read in conjunction with the original RP. The RP-Addendum contents are elaborated in the following table, in comparison with the original RP.

- RP Components 1 Original RP RP Addendum - I Regulatory Review i Chapter 2 Nor included. I I (The review provided in the Original RP applies to the present addendum as well.)

Project Description I Chapter 3 ' Chapter 2 I 1 ' (For additional scope only.) Stakeholder Consultations 1 Chapter 4 Chapter 3 (For additional consultations only.) Socioeconomic and Chapter 5 1 Chapter 4 Resettlement Issues j (For additional scope only.)

Entitlement Principles and Chapter 6 Nor included. Framework (The principles and framework provided in the main RP apply to the additional scope as well.) -- Institutional and Chapter 7 Nor included. Implementation Arrangements (The arrangements proposed in the main RP apply to the additioDal scope as well.)

Monitoring and Evaluation Chapter 8 Nor included. (The arrangements proposed in the main RP apply to the additiohal -- scope as well.) Resettlement Budget Chapter 9 Chapter 5 ; (For additional scope only.)

1.2.5 Study Methodology

The key steps that were followed while conducting the ESA and developing the RP, are briefly described below.

December 2007 FRTON04HES-Addendum-RP Policy and Legal Framework HESCO 6'h STG and ELR Project (2006-07) Resettlement Plan - Addendum

Scoping During this phase, key information on the project was collected and reviewed. A 'long list' of the potential environmental as well as social issues likely to arise as a result of the project was developed. Analysis of the stakeholders was one of the key elements of the scoping phase of the study. During this, identification of the stakeholders was carried out, followed by an analysis of their interests and influence with respect to the proposed project. Based upon this analysis, the plan was developed to carry out the stakeholder consultation (described below). Stakeholder Consultation Stakeholder consultations were carried out during the ESA study, in order to disseminate the project information among the key stakeholders, and to address their concerns in the project implementation, as much as possible. Meetings were held in Islamabad Hyderabad with the institutional stakeholders and key environmental and social issues discussed. Consultations with the grass root stakeholders were carried out at the project sites (grid station locations and transmission line routes). Efforts were made to solicit the concerns and views of rural women as well, and a female staff was part of the study team conducting the stakeholder consultations. While women were present in most of the consultations held, women-only consultations were conducted by the female staff. During these consultations, the stakeholders were provided the key project information, and their apprehensions/comments/suggestions noted. In particular, detailed consultations were carried out with the grass root stakeholders, including the project beneficiaries as well as the people likely to be adversely impacted by the project. Separate consultations were held for the additional scope of the project as part of the present study. These consultations focused the communities that are likely to be affected by the ELR works in the Hyderabad and Mirpur Khas cities. Both residential as well as commercial areas were coved during these consultations. Data Collection/Compilation During this phase, data was collected and compiled, in order to develop a baseline of the project area's physical, biological and human environment. For this purpose, both review of secondary sources and field data collection were carried out. Field visits to each of the new grid station site, existing grid stations (which are to be extended/augmented/ upgraded) and transmission line routes, were carried out. The secondary resources that were consulted included reports of the studies carried out earlier, published books and data, and relevant websites. With the help of these resources a generic profile of the entire project area was developed. In addition to the above, extensive field visits were carried out in order to collect the primary data specific to the project sites (grid station locations and transmission line routes). During these field visits, key information on environmental and social parameters was collected. During the primary data collection, environmental as well as social hot spots falling at or near the project sites were identified, and most importantly, the project affectees were determined.

December 2007 FRTON04HES-Addendum-RP Policy and Legal Framework HESCO 6'h STG and ELR Project (2006-07) Resettlement Plan -Addendum

During the field investigations, detailed information was collected on the cultivated area falling under the transmission line routes, since damage to the crops would be the primary asset loss during the proposed project. Information was also collected on the ownersltenants of the cultivated land under the transmission lines. Impact Assessment During the impact assessment, the environmental, socioeconomic, and project information collected in previous steps was used to determine the potential impacts of the proposed project. Subsequent to this, the potential impacts were characterized in order to determine their significance. Mitigation measures were identified where required to minimize the significant environmental and social impacts. A management framework was also developed in the form of an ESMP for the implementation of the mitigation measures identified during the study. The impact assessment has been carried out and the associated mitigation measures recommended on the basis of the surveyed transmission line routes and other project locations. Variations in the impacts and associated mitigation measures are expected if the project components are moved outside the surveyed corridor. RP Development The RP has been developed in accordance with the OP 4.12. The primary data collected while conducting the ESA study was used to identify the PAPS and to determine the magnitude of.the compensation. The RP provides entitlement framework, compensation assessment and disbursement procedure, monitoring requirements and resettlement budget for the proposed project.

LAN t?- December 2007 FRT07V04HES-Addendum-RP HESCO 6Ih STG and ELR Project (2006-07) Resettlement Plan - Addendum

Description of the Project

This Chapter provides a simplified description of the additional project scope. The information on HESCO system and other pertinent details are provided in Chapter 3 of the main ESA report.

2.1 Project Objectives The overarching objective of the 6'h STG and ELR project is to increase the efficiency, reliability and quality of the electricity supply. The project aims to achieve:

Strengthening of electricity transmission network to reduce bottlenecks and improve system reliability and quality

Strengthening of electricity distribution network to reduce losses and improvement in supply. This will be achieved by adding new grid stations, upgrading, augmenting, converting, and rehabilitating the existing ones, adding new transmission lines, rehabilitating the existing transmission lines, bifurcating long distribution feeders, replacing oldlundersized conductors as well as transformers, replacing conventional meters and other allied activities.

2.2 Project Components In its total span of five years, the 6Ih STG project envisages establishment of fifteen new grid stations, in addition to converting seven, augmenting nineteen, extending forty-three and rehabilitating 216 of the existing grid stations. The project also includes laying of 451 km of new and rehabilitation of 2,980 km of existing transmission lines.

The ELR components include rehabilitation and bifurcation of fifty-seven 1 I-kV feeders, installation of 1,134 energy meters on distribution transformers, laying of 919 km of aerial bundled cables for LT feeders, and replacing 130,693 energy meters for electricity consumers. The ELR works will be carried out in Hyderabad and Mirpur Khas cities, during the year 2006-07.

The present RP Addendum covers the additional €jthSTG and ELR project components which will be undertaken during the Year 2006-07. These components and their salient information are tabulated below.

Project Component Features Augmentation of Existing Grid Stations -- I. Kot Diji / 132 KV grid station; I 1 x 13 MVA transformer 2. Hyderabad - Phuleli : 132 KV grid station; 1 1 x 26 MVA transformer

2-1 December 2007 FRTON04HES-Addendum-RP Project Description HESCO 6ih STG and ELR Project (2006-07) Resettlement Plan -Addendum

------Project Component I Features 3. Naushehro Feroze 1 132 KV grid station; ) 1 x 26 MVA transformer 4. Umer Kot 1 66 KV grid station; 1 1 x 13 MVA transformer Extension of Existing Grid Stations 5. Humayun j 132 KV grid station; i 1 x Line Bay 6. Jacobabad 132 KV grid station; I 1 x Line Bay Rehabilitation of Existing Grid Stations - - 7. A total of 60 grid stations I Replacement of grid station equipment / and compomnet Rehabilitation of Existing Transmission Lines 8. A total of 15 transmission lines I Total Length: 868 km ELR 9. Rehabilitation and bifurcation of 11 kV 57 feeders - in Hyderabad and Mirpur Khas j cities. 10. Installation of enery meters on 200 and 100 kVA distribution transformers - in Hyderabad and Mirpur Khas cities. - 11. Installation of aerial bundled cables replacing Total Length: 919 km bare conductor of the LT network, alongwith complete insultaed accessories upto the consumer meters - in Hyderabad and Mirpur Khas cities. 12. Replecement of conventional energy meters j 130,693 with the static solid state meters - in Hyderabad and Mirpur Khas cities.

The above components are shown in Exhibit 2.1. For further project details, see Chapter 3 of the ESA Addendum.

2.3 Construction Activities

A simplified description of the activities to be carried out during the execution of the additional scope of the proposed project is provided below. The project through its agreement(s) with the contractor(s) will ensure that the contractor(s) implements the mitigation measures detailed in the ESMP (provided in Chapter 7 of the ESA Addendum), as well as follows the principles laid out in the entitlement framework on land acquisition and payment of all types of compensation.

2.3.1 Augmentation of New Grid Stations

The activities which will be carried out for the augmentation of the existing grid stations (Kot Dijji, Hyderabad-Phuleli, Naushehro Feroze and Umer Kot) are provided below.

2-2 December 2007 FRTON04HES-Addendum-RP Project Description HESCO 6'h STG and ELR Project (2006-07) Resettlement Plan - Addendum

1. The Design Department will prepare the detailed design of the grid station augmentation, including the civil design and construction drawings for the transformer foundation (concrete pad), and equipment details.

2. The tenders will be floated for the equipment purchase (power transformer and its accessories). In parallel to this, estimates for the civil works (transformer foundation - in case the existing foundation is not suitable for the proposed transformer) will be prepared and approvals obtained from the concerned authority.

3. Subsequent to the above, tendering, proposal evaluation and contract awarding will be carried out for the civil construction and equipment supply.

4. Once the new transformer is available, it will be handed over to GSC Department. who will install it after removing the existing transformer and once the civil works are complete.

5. Once the transformer installation is complete, and all other accessories fixed, the system will be tested jointly by the GSO and GSC departments.

6. After the testing, the new transformer will be commissioned and put into operation.

For the proposed project, the grid station augmentation works can be implemented through turn-key contracts, where the contractor is responsible for the supply, installation and commissioning of the entire system.

Furthermore, in view of the extent of the works under the proposed project, HESCO may employ a supervision consultant, in order to ensure quality of the construction, installation and testing works.

2.3.2 Extension of Existing Grid Stations The activities which will be carried out for the extension of the existing grid stations (Humayun and Jacobabad) are provided below.

1. The Design Department will prepare the detailed design of the grid station extension.

2. The tenders will be floated for the equipment purchase for the Line Bay.

3. Subsequent to the above, tendering, proposal evaluation and contract awarding will be carried out for the equipment supply.

4. Once the new equipment is available, it will be handed over to GSC Department, who will install it.

5. Once the line bay installation is complete, and all other accessories fixed, the system will be tested jointly by the GSO and GSC departments.

6. After the testing, the new line bay will be commissioned and once the new 132-kV Humayun-Jacobabad transmission line is also complete, the system will be put into operation.

e=LAN December 2007 FRTON04HES-Addendum-RP Project Description HESCO 6Ih STG and ELR Project (2006-07) "Resettlement Plan - Addendum

For the proposed project, some or all of the grid station extension works can be implemented through turn-key contracts, where the contractor is responsible for the supply, installation and commissioning of the entire system.

2.3.3 Rehabilitation of Grid Stations The activities involved in the rehabilitation of the existing grid stations are described below.

1. Procurement of the components to be replaced.

2. Replacing the components after isolating the relevant systems and taking all safety precautions.

3. Putting the system back in to operation.

2.3.4 Rehabilitation of Transmission Lines The activities which are carried out for the rehabilitation of the existing transmission lines are provided below.

1. The Design Department will prepare the detailed design for the rehabilitation works, such as re-conductoring.

2. Based upon the detailed design, the material will be procured after tendering.

3. Subsequent to the above, tendering for the construction works will be carried out and contract awarded.

4. Construction activities will be started by demarcating the tower locations (for the tower replacements). Compensation will be determined and disbursed.

5. Construction of the tower foundation will be taken in hand. Towers will be erected subsequent to this.

6. Once towers are erected, stringing will be carried out for the replacing the transmission line conductor) and accessories (insulators, etc.) installed. Compensation will be paid for any crop damage.

7. Once installation is complete, testing will be carried out. After that the line will be re- commissioned and put into operation.

2.3.5 ELR Works Execution The activities involved in the ELR works execution include the following:

HT Feeders

1. Awarding the contract

2. Procurement of the conductor, insulators, and other materials to be installed or replaced.

3. Isolating (disconnecting) the relevant feeder 4. Replacement of conductor, insulators and other accessories

December 2007 FRT07V04HES-Addendum-RP Project Description HESCO 6thSTG and ELR Project (2006-07) Resettlement Plan - Addendum

5. Putting the feeder back in to operation. Energy Meters at Distribution Transformers

1. Awarding the contract

2. Procurement of the energy meters and other accessories. 3. Isolating (disconnecting) the relevant transformers

4. Installation of energy meters on the transformers 5. Putting the transformers back in to operation. Aerial Bundled Cables 1. Awarding the contract

2. Procurement of the cables and other accessories.

3. Isolating (disconnecting) the relevant LT feeders

4. Removing the LT bare conductor

5. Laying of the insulated cables on the existing poles

6. Installing accessories

7. Putting the LT feeders back in to operation. Replacing Energy Meters at the Consumer End 1. Awarding the contract

2. Procurement of the energy meters and other accessories.

3. Removing the existing meters

4. Installation of new energy meters

5. Putting the electricity connection back in to operation.

2.3.6 Staffing during Construction Phase The maximum staffing levels during the construction phase of the proposed project is expected to be 100-150 at a project site, though exact numbers can only be determined once detailed construction planning is carried out.

2.4 Operation and Maintenance Activities The proposed grid stations will be manned round the clock and important parameters (voltage, load, power factor, etc.) monitored. Daily log sheets will be filled recording the key data. Any abnormality will be recorded and concerned departments informed for taking remedial measures. The key activities will include:

b Operation of grid stations

b Scheduled maintenance

b Checkingltesting of transformers

December 2007 FRTON04HES-Addendum-RP Project Description HESCO 6'h STG and ELR Project (2006-07) Resettlement Plan - Addendum

b Testing of breakers

b Testing of protection system

b Transmission line patrolling

b Washinglreplacement of insulators

b Emergency maintenance

b Locating the fault

b Carrying out repairs or replacements

b Restoring the system to the normal operating conditions. Maintenance of Transformers Power transformer repairs: The minor repairs for the power transformers will be carried out at the grid stations, however for the major repairs, the transformers will be transported to the WAPDA's Power Transformer Reclamation Workshop at Kot Lakhpat, Lahore. Distribution transformer repairs: No field repair is normally allowed for the distribution transformers. If the transformers are damaged within the warranty period (usually 2 years after delivery), these will be returned to the suppliers. If damaged after this period, the transformers will be sent to the Distribution Transformer Reclamation Workshop located in Sukkur.

Transformer oil testing: The dielectric strength of the transformer oil filled in the power transformers will be tested every year at the gird stations. For this purpose, a simple device called the oil testing set will be used. Oil sample will be taken out of the transformer and test performed. A record will be maintained for these yearly tests. No action will be taken if the test results are within the prescribed limits. However, if the dielectric strength of the transformer oil is found to be less than the allowable limits, the oil will be replaced. After every five years, a more comprehensive test will be carried out for the transformer oil. Three oil samples will be taken from each transformer and sent to the WAPDA's High Voltage and Research Laboratory in Faisalabad. At the Laboratory, the following Bests will be carried out:

b Flash point;

b Viscosity;

b Moisture;

b Gas content; and

b Dielectric strength

Currently, no tests are performed to check the presence of poly-chlorinated biphenyl (PCB) in the transformer oil, though the transformer specifications include a clause that the oil should be PCB-free. (The PCB analysis will be included in the future testing - further discussed later in the document.)

December 2007 FRT07V04HES-Addendum-RP Project Description HESCO 6'h STG and ELR Project (2006-07) Resettlement Plan - Addendum

Transformer Oil Disposal - Current Practice: 'The transformer oil is mostly recycled in the transformer workshops. The unusable waste oil is disposed through contractors. WAPDA procedures include a list of approved firms for the disposal of the used transformer oil.

Not much is known about the fate of the waste oil leaving the workshops, however the probable end uses include burning in brick kilns, oil recycling facilities, miscellaneous works in small workshops and even as a massaging oil (thought to be useful for joint pain^).^ Staffing during O&M Phase The augmented or extended gird stations would not need any additional manpower. Similarly, the rehabilitated transmission lines and ELR works will also not require any additional maintenance staff.

"ssessment of the waste disposal practices in the transformer maintenance workshops was not included in the scope of the present study. The information given here is mostly based upon the anecdotal sources.

December 2007 FRTON04HES-Addendum-RP Project Description HESCO 6'h STG and ELR Project (2006-07) Resettlement Plan - Addendum

Exhibit 2.1: Project Components

(Please see the following page.)

December 2007 FRTON04HES-Addendum-RP /- GWJTK~~ SHIKAR , I' MEHAR MATELO

ONARA-I

MEHAR 0

ABAD

DADU OLQ @N.FEROZ OPADIDAN

PATH3

LADlUN

Legend Assignment Environmental and Soc~alAssessment - Addendum

Projecl 61h STG Project

Transmission Line Rehab Cl~ent HESCO

Grid Station Rehab 0 s~urce Data Prov~dedby HESCO Title Grid Station Augmentation Additional Scope Project Components Grid Station Extension Ref GRP07E3-1 HES-Add Date October 2007 HESCO dhSTG and ELR Project (2006-07) Resettlement Plan - Addendum

This Chapter provides the objectives, process and outcome of the stakeholder consultations conducted as part of the ESA study for the additional scope of the 6Ih STG and ELR project. The stakeholder consultations discussed in this Chapter augment the one given in the main RP (Chapter 4) for the original project scope.

3.1 Objectives The stakeholder consultation is an integral part of the environmental and social assessment for a project such as the 6fi STG and ELR, and aims to provide a two-way communication channel between the stakeholders and the project proponents. In line with this aim, the objectives of the stakeholder consultations conducted as oart of the ESA were to: w develop and maintain communication links between the project propohents and stakeholders,

provide key project information to the stakeholders, and to solicit their views 011 the project and its potential or perceived impacts, and

ensure that views and concerns of the stakeholders are incorporated into the project design and implementation with the objectives of reducing or offsetting negative impacts and enhancing benefits of the proposed project.

3.2 Stakeholder Identification and Analysis The stakeholder analysis reveals the nature and magnitude of the stakeholders' interests in and influence on a project. During the ESA of the original project scope, detailed stakeholder analysis was carried out (Section 7.3 of main ESA report), which is applicable for the ESA of the additional project scope as well. On the basis of the stakeholder analysis mentioned above, the following stakeholders were identifidd: People directly affected by the Project (ie, project affected persons or PAPS). w Project beneficiaries w HESCO officials District governments w Environment Protection Agency

The broader interested community w The NGOs, international organizations and other interest groups.

December 2007 FRT07V04HES-Addendum-RP Stakeholder Consultations HESCO 6th STG and ELR Project (2006-07) Resettlement Plan - Addendum

3.3 Stakeholder Consultations during Original ESA Comprehensive consultations were held with the above stakeholders during the original ESA. During these consultations, a participatory and consultative approach was employed for information dissemination and data collection. Meetings were held with a range of key informants as well as government and civil society stakeholders at different levels. The focus group discussions with the grass-root stakeholders were held, whereas meetings were held with the institutional stakeholders. These discussions were held with project affected people, project beneficiaries and other local communities in Hyderabad, Jacobabad, Shikarpur, Larkana, Sanghar, Mirpur Khas, Tando Allahyar, Badin, Umerkot and Thatta districts. Efforts were made to include the women in the consultation process as much as possible. While women were included in most of the consultations, the women-only consultations were also held, and for this purpose, the consultation team included a female staff. The consultation process was conceived to interact meaningfully with affected communities and other stakeholders. The consultations also helped better understand local knowledge with respect to the various sets of issues and concerns, and integrate these into the project design and ESMP. (Please see Appendix A of the main RP for stakeholder consultation details carried out during the original ESA.)

3.4 Stakeholders Consultations for Additional Project Scope For the additional STG portion of the proposed project, no further consultations were carried out, since the proposed activities are quite similar to the ones that were covered in the original scope, for which detailed consultations have already been conducted, as described in Section 3.3 above. However, for the ELR components, detailed consultations were held as part of the present ESA, in Hyderabad and Mirpur Khas cities - where the ELR works are planned to be carried out - since the nature of the project works and their impacts are quite different compared to the ones for the STG works. The details of these consultations are provided in Appendix A.1, and summarized below. Consultations in Hyderabad City A total of ten focus group discussion sessions were held in Hyderabad city. These consultations were held both in residential as well as commercial areas of the city. The consultations were also held with the elected representatives and local government officials of the area.

During these meetings, the participants were informed of the proposed project, and their views, apprehensions and suggestions sought. The participants shared their grievances associated with the electricity network, and pointed out the safety hazard caused by open LT wires in congested areas, and hardship faced by them due to frequent power outages. They complained about the existing poor state of the electricity network, causing threat to life and property. According to them, the electrocution accidents were quite common, sometimes even resulting in human lives. They also informed about the fire incidents caused by the electricity short circuiting.

December 2007 FRTON04HES-Addendurn-RP Stakeholder Consultations HESCO STG and ELR Project (2006-07) Resettlement Plan -Addendum

In congested parts of the city, electricity theft is a common feature. This aspect was also covered during the consultations. The economic hardship and high electricity price were cited to be the main causes of electricity theft.

The participants generally appreciated and welcomed the HESCO's proposed plans of rehabilitating its HT and LT networks. Some of them however shared their apprehension that the electricity tariff would be further increased as a result of the proposed project. Consultations in Mirpur Khas City In Mirpur Khas city as well, a total of ten focus group discussion sessions were held, and much like the Hyderabad consultations discussed above, both residential and commercial areas were covered during these meetings. The elected representatives and local government officials of the area were also included in these consultations.

During these consultations, the participants were provided information on the HESCO's proposed project in the city. In addition, their views, apprehensions and suggestions were also obtained on the proposed project. The participants shared their hardship and sufferings associated with the poor state of the electricity system, and also complained about the safety hazard caused by open LT wires in congested areas, and frequent power shutdowns. According to some of the participants, the electrocution accidents were quite common particularly in the congested areas of the city, which sometimes even caused loss of human lives.

The electricity theft is quite common in parts of the city. This aspect was also discussed during the consultations. According to the participants, the economic hardship and high electricity price were the main reasons of electricity theft.

The proposed project was generally appreciated by the participants of the focus group discussions. Some of them however were of the view that the proposed project would increase the electricity tariff. A few participants thought this project to be wastage of resources.

December 2007 FRT07V04HES-hddendum-RP HESCO 6thSTG and ELR Project (2006-07) Resettlement Plan - Addendum

4 Key Socioeconomic and Resettlement Issues

The socioeconomic impacts and resettlement aspects of the additional project scope have been assessed and their mitigation identified in Chapter 6 of the ESA-Addendum. The key issues are summarized in this chapter.

4.1 Socioeconomic lmpacts during Design Phase The following aspects will be considered during the design of the proposed project, in order to improve the social performance of the project.

Likely Causes of : Impacts ; Measures to be Incorporated in Project Design Impacts Safety hazards Inappropriate equipment I All safety precautions will be taken to and public / selection (such as PCB- 1 minimize the safety hazards and risk of health concerns j containing transformers) / accidental electrocution. HESCO's standards for occupational health and safety will be strictly followed when designing the systems/facilities.

Appropriate waste disposal systems will be included in the design of the grid stations. These include sewage disposal, and if required, treatment system (eg, septic tank).

PCB-free transformers will be selected for the project. (This aspect is already included in the HESCO's transformer specifications.)

Noise Poor equipment selection The project equipment, particularly emissions transformers to be installed at the grid stations will meet the noise standards (70 dB(A) for industrial zones day and night; 45 dB(A) night and 55 dB(A) daytime for residential areas).

Aesthetic value Intrusion in the natural Tree plantation will be carried inside and at landscape the periphery of the grid stations, without compromising the safety aspects (ie, required clearances will be maintained). For this purpose, provision will be made in the site layout of the grid stations.

Damage to Poor design/route Appropriate design requirements infrastructure , selection of transmission (clearances, etc.) will be followed while : line crossing the roads, railway lines and canals. Similarly the tower locations will be selected at safe distances from such infrastructure.

December 2007 FRTONOIHES-Addendum-RP Key Socioeconomic and Resettlement Issues HESCO 6'h STG and ELR Project (2006-07) Resettlement Plan - Addendum

4.2 Socioeconomic Impacts and Mitigation during Gonstr~~ctionPhase

The key socioeconomic impacts associated with the construction phase of the proposed project and recommended mitigation measures are provided in the following table.

2 Impacts j Mitigation Damage to crops w Compensation will be paid for the crops damaged during the construction activities. The compensation will be paid to the cultivator, and absence of the land title will not be a bar to receiving the compensation.

w It will be ensured that the land under the transmission line towers remains available and accessible for cultivation.

In case the above is not possible, the land under the tower will be acquired in accordance with the LA4 procedures (Section 17.4 of the LA4 will not be used).

Operation of project vehicles and construction machinery outside the ROWwill be avoided. Attempts will be made to use existing trackslroads to access the transmission line corridorltower locations. In case new access routes are necessary, the cultivated land will be avoided as far as possible. Damage to crops will be compensated.

i. Grievance redressal mechanism will be put in place to address the ; community complaints.

Damage to w Operation of construction machinery and project vehicles will be avoided irrigation network close to the canals and water courses.

w Any damage caused by the project activities will be completely repaired. i] Public Nuisance w The works will be planned and carried out in a manner thus causing minimal disruption and disturbance to shopkeepers and shoppers in the commercial areas, and residents in the residential areas.

The works will be carried out after informing the affected population.

w 'The local councilors and other community representatives will be contacted before commencing the work in any particular area. Liaison with them will be maintained throughout the works.

w The electricity shutdown duration will be minimized through astute planning. The shutdown hours will be communicated to the affected community in advance.

D The works will be carried out preferably in winters, thus reducing the public hardship caused by power shutdown. i The works in congested commercial areas (such as the Shahi Bazaar in : Hyderabad) will preferably be carried out on Fridays, which is the weekly

4-2 December 2007 FRT07V04HES-Addendum-RP Key Socioeconomic and Resettlement Issues HESCO fiih STG and ELR Project (2006-07) Resettlement Plan - Addendum

Impacts / Mitigation I holiday in these areas. m Grievance redressal mechanism will be put in place to address the community complaints.

Blocked access / B In case of the blockage of the existing routes, alternate routes will be 1 identified and provided in consultation with affected communities. 8 -- -.. . - --- -. - - - - - Noise !.It will be ensured that the noise levels measured at the communities near the project sites are kept within the acceptable limits (70 dB(A) for industrial zones day and night; 45 dB(A) night and 55 dB(A) daytime for residential areas).

Noise levels will be measured at the key locations described above. If the noise levels are found to be more than the prescribed limits, appropriate measures will be undertaken by the construction team such as rescheduling the works, using quieter equipment andlor erecting barriers to protect the communities from excessive noise.

Vehicular traffic through the communities will be avoided as far as possible. Project routes will be authorized by the HESCO.

Vehicle speeds will be kept low, and horns will not be used while passing through or near the communities.

Vehicles will have exhaust silencers to minimize noise generation. The vehicles noise will comply with the NEQS (discussed in Chapter 2 of ESA report).

Nighttime traffic will be avoided near the communities, as far as possible.

Movement of all project vehicles and personnel will be restricted to within work areas, to avoid noise disturbance.

Working hours for construction activities within the communities will be limited to between 8 am and 6 pm (between 6 am and 8 prn during the summers).

m Liaison with the community will be maintained. Grievance redressal mechanism will be put in place to address the community complaints, as stated earlier. Safety hazard I The construction sites will have protective fencing to avoid any 1 unauthorized entry. 1 The project drivers will be trained for defensive driving skilis. I Vehicular speeds nearlwithin communities will be kept low to minimize I safety hazards. I 1 Construction camp sites will be located at least 500 m away from the I nearest community. Camp sites will be selected with HESCO's approval.

December 2007 FRT07V04HES-Addendum-RP Key Socioeconomic and Resettlement Issues HESCO 6'h STG and ELR Project (2006-07) Resettlement Plan - Addendum

- impacts Mitigation 1 i The camps will have periphery fencing to avoid any unauthorized entry. 1 I Firefighting equipment will be made available at the camps. / . The camp staff will be provided fire fighting training. / All safety precautions will be taken to transport, handle and store hazardous substances, such as fuel. 1 . Liaison with the community will be maintained. In particular, the nearby communities will be informed before commencing the testing 1 commissioning of the system. Protective fencing will be used where ,1 appropriatelpossible. Awareness raising program will be implemented to 1 educate the communities regarding the hazards associated with the 1 I transmission lines, and other electrical systemslequipment. Warning 1 signs will be used at the appropriate locations. Public Health 1 . The construction camps will have septic tanks and soaking pits of lssues ! adequate size.

j Camps will be at least 500 m from any groundwater wells used by the i community. I The construction camps will have appropriate solid waste disposal I mechanism. 1 . The construction camps and site offices will have first-aid kits. 1 . The construction crew will be provided awareness for the transmissible I diseases (such as HIVIAIDS, hepatitis B and C). Damage to I . All damaged infrastructure will be restored to original or better condition. infrastructure Gender issues . The routes used by the women will be avoided as far as possible. If i unavoidable, alternate routes to be identified for the communities, if j required, especially along routes frequented by women, such as route to ] the local well or water source. Social lssues / Camp sites for construction will be 500 m away from the nearest I community, as recommended earlier.

!.Construction crew will avoid in entering villages and settlements. i i Communities will be informed and consulted before commencing works j . i inside or near the communities. i ;. Strict code of conduct will be maintained by the construction crew. Local j norms will be respected. 1 Child labor will not be allowed during the project. . .--- Impacts on Sites ;. The ELR works inside the Pacca Qila and Kaccha Qila will be carried out of Historical, in a least intrusive manner, no excavation or heavy construct~onactivities Cultural.

4-4 December 2007 FRT07V04HES-Addendum-RP Key Socioeconomic and Resettlement Issues HESCO 6'h STG and ELR Project (2006-07) Resettlement Plan -Addendum

i Impacts i Mitigation Archeological or 1 will be carried out, and the works will not involve use of heavy Religious Significance construction machinery at these sites. The works will remain clear of the protected antiquities, such as the outer wall of the Pacca Qila (see Exhibit 5.13 of main ESA report for a list of these sites). I1 / Awareness raising of the construction crew will be carried out regarding 1 the significance of the archeologicallhistorical sites. The Pakistan Archeology Department will be formally notified prior to commencing project works at the above sites.

Photographic record will be maintained for these works (for pre-project, during the construction activities, and post-project).

In case of discovery of any undocumented sites or artifacts of historical, cultural, archeological or religious significance, the work will be stopped.

Relocation of such project components will be carried out if feasible. i1 / The provincial and federal archeological departments will be notified / immediately, and their advice will be sought before resumption of the 1 construction activities at such sites. I The existing graveyards will not be damaged. The construction work / close to the graveyards will be carried out after informinglconsulting the / relevant communities. I

4.3 Affected Persons and Assets

The land affected by the project activities comprises the following:

The transmission line corridor

Access routes.

During the transmission line rehabilitation activities, any crops falling within the 30-m construction right of way (ROW) are likely to be damaged. HESCO will pay compensation for this crop damage to the affected landownerslcultivators. A summary of the crop damage and the estimated compensation amount is provided in Exhibit 4.1 (details of the landownership and compensation amounts are provided in Appendix A of this document. The implementation procedure for compensation determination and payment is provided in Section 7.2 or the original RP).

Crop compensation for rehabilitation of transmission lines (essentially replacement of conductor and towers) has been estimated based upon wheat crop for one season - assuming that the rehabilitation activities will be completed in a single crop-season.

The community properties, physical infrastructure or sites of religious importance (such as mosques, graves and shrines) will not be affected by the construction activities, as identified by the ESA study.

December 2007 FRT07V04HES-Addendum-RP Key Socioeconomic and Resettlement Issues HESCO 6'h STG and ELR Project (2006-07) Resettlement Plan - Addendum

Exhibit 4.1 : Summary of CroplTree Compensation

Crop Damage Area Number Crop Tree Transmission / (Acres) i of Compensation I Compensation Line 1 (1 acre = 0.4047 hectare) 1 Affectees (Pak Rs.) I (Pak Rs.) Mirpur Khas - Samaro

Pano Aqil - Rohri 1 37.52 1 165,000 / 35,000 I ! 1 / Guddu - Kandhkot 13.97 9 61,455 20,000 I Kashmore - 21 / Shikarpur , Tando Mohammad Khan - B S Karim Kotri Powerhouse i 23.28 7 1 102,425 1 25,000 ! 1 I - Thatta j Thatta - Gharo 0.24 2 1,033 5,000

. . Sujawal - Laduin 260.51 42 1,144,827 190,000 I Kandh Kot - Thull 1 2.58 1 14 11,362 1 55,000 ! !

Access Routes 32 Not 140,800 known Total 711.04 1 177 1 3,127,588 1 650,000 Grand Total 3,777,588

Note See detarls In Appendix A.2 Basis: For crop compensation, transmission line corridor has been taken as 30 m; crop comgensation has been estimated for one wheat season, at the rate of Rs. 4,400 per acre (Rs. 10,868 per hectare) per season.

December 2007 FRT07V04HES -Addendum-RP HESCO 6'h STG and ELR Project (2006-07) Resettlement Plan - Addendum

5 Resettlement Budget

The project proponent will make the necessary budget provisions to ensure that the mitigation commitments including compensation and the monitoring programs can be fully implemented. The entire budget for managing the environmental and socioeconomic aspects, including the resettlement, is provided in Exhibit 5.1. This amount is in addition to the one provided in the main RP.

December 2007 FRTON04HES-Addendum-RP Resettlement Budget HESCO 6" STG and ELR Project (2006-07) Resettlement Plan - Addendum

Exhibit 5.1: Environmental and Social Management Cost for Additional

Project Scope a

Description Cost Basis (Pak Rs.) 1 Environmental and Social Personnel

ESI (2) 1,440,000 18 months x 40,000 PM ESM (6) 0 To be included in the Contractor's cost 2 Environmental and Social 45,000 Initial water analysis to Monitoring determine baseline conditions (9 locations; 5,000 per sample). 9 water samples per month; Rs. 5,000 per sample; 18 months.

3 External Monitoring 3 x I-day visits; 6 locations (GS): (1 8 days). 3 x 1 day visits; 5 TL locations (1 5 days). 33 days x 10,000 per day x 2 experts Environmental and Social 0 Covered under the main ESA Trainings report. 5 Development of PCBs 0 Covered under the main ESA Elimination Plan report. Cropltree compensation 3,777,588 See Appendix A.2 for details.

7 Miscellaneous Expenses 500,000 Lump sum 8 Contingencies 217,000 About 3 % of the above Total 7,449,588 " This amount is in addition to the one included in the main ESA report (Exhibit 10.7) The number of ESls may be adjusted according to requirement. C -The duration of the proposed project has been assumed as 18 months. Frequency of analysis may be adjusted by ESI on the basis of the previous results or sensitivity of area.

December 2007 FRTON04HES-Addendum-RP HESCO 6thSTG and ELR Project (2006-07) Resettlement Plan - Addendum

Appendix A: Field Data

This appendix provides the details of the stakeholder consultations carried out for the additional project scope. Also provided in the Appendix are the details on the cultivated area falling under these routes, the associated crop compensation amounts and the names of land owners/cultivators.

Citation in the Iblain Document: Sections 3.4 and 4.3.

A.l Stakeholder Consultatio~iDetails

Consultation #I

Date: 8thSeptember 2007 City: Hyderabad

Location: Main Qasimabad area

Number of Houses/Shops: 150 - 200

Population of Area (Approx): 2,500 to 3,000 What are the disadvantages of bare LT conductor? What is the current condition of the electricity network? The participants informed that the bare conductor posed serious threat to the lives and property of the residents of the area. They added that the electricity theft was quite easy with the bare LT conductor. The existing condition of the system was stated to be quite poor, causing frequent electricity faults and low voltage.

Are there any alternatives to open wires for electricity distribution (ie, bare LT conductor)? Some of the participants were of the view that the under ground cable system or insulated cable on LT poles could be the solution. They further opined that strict laws should be formulated and enforced to eradicate the energy theft. Participants' views on electricity theft: Main reason of the theft of the energy was stated to be its high price, and the economic condition of the people. The participant informed that in some instances the total monthly bills reached half the total salary of the house owner.

Attitude of community members (for project): The community generally supported the project and welcomed the HESCO's initiative for improving the supply system, and making it safer, thus reducing the chances of loss of life and property.

December 2007 FRT07V04HES-Addendum-RP Appendix A HESCO 6'h STG and ELR Project (2006-07) Resettlement Plan -Addendum

Apprehension of community about the project: Some participants shared their apprehensions regarding possible tariff increase as a result of the proposed project. They thought the project could prove to be quite expensive, hence forcing HESCO to increase the already high electricity rates.

Expectations of community about the project:

The participants hoped that with the help of this project, the HESCO's electricity network would be safer for them, and the risk of electrocution would be greatly reduced.

Names of stakeholders consulted:

b Mr. Arif Dar Welding workshop owner

b Mr. Mr. Raheeb Hassan LPG gas seller

b Mr. Rameez Lakho LPG gas seller

b Mr. Zaman Ali Samo Driver

b Mr. Hakim Lai Kandhro Shop keeper

b Mr. Zubair Zaman Sheedi Dry cleaner

b Mr. A. Latif Khakhi Government contractor

b Mr. Naseem Akhtar Local resident

b Mr. Sahab Khan Khand Local resident.

Consultation # 2 Date: 8thSeptember 2007 City: Hyderabad Location: Gulistan-e-Sajjad

Number of HousedShops: 200 - 250

Population ofArea (Approx): 4,000 - 5,000

What are the disadvantages of bare LT conductor? What is the current condition of the electricity network?

The bare LT conductor was stated to be the main cause of the electrocution accidents, some of which have even proved to be fatal. The participants complained that the existing electricity network was very dangerous, and live conductors passed very close to the buildings, thus posing electrocution risk. They added that the existing condition of the system also resulted in frequent electricity faults and shut downs, and the bare LT conductor was partly responsible for the menace of electricity theft. Are there any alternatives to open wires for electricity distribution (ie, bare LT conductor)?

The participants were not aware of any alternative to the existing LT network. They however wanted the system to be improved, and electricity theft eradicated. Participants' views on electricity theft:

December 2007 FRT07V04HES-Addendum-RP Appendix A HESCO 6'h STG and ELR Project (2006-07) Resettlement Plan - Addendum

Main reason of the theft of the energy was cited to be high electricity tariff, and the poor economic condition of the communities. Other reasons included ineffective enforcement of the rules. Attitude of community members (for project):

The community generally welcomed the project. No misgivings were shown by the participants regarding the proposed activities under the project. Apprehension of community about the project:

The community did not share any apprehension about the project. They were generally found aware of the typical activities involved in the HT and LT works. Expectations of community about the project: The participants expected HESCO to take all safety precautions while carrying out the project works. They hoped the system to be safer and more efficient, with lesser power outages. Names of stakeholders consulted: Mr. Ali Hassan Jatoi Naib Nazim, UC Qasimabad

b Mr. lnderjeet Lohano Councilor UC-3, Qasimabad

b Mr. Zia Uddin Baloch Shop Keeper

b Mr. Tanveer Azad Soomro Driver

b Mr. Perano Shah Electrician

b Mr. Tauheed Qureshi Local Resident

b Mr. Shams Aapun Local Resident Mr. Tariq Bajari Local Resident.

Consultation # 3

Date: 8thSeptember 2007 City: Hyderabad Location: Naseem Nagar

Number of Houses/Shops: 100 - 150 Population of Area (Approx): 1,500 - 1,800 What are the disadvantages of bare LT conductor? What is the current condition of the electricity network? The community shared that the existing system had become obsolete and expanded haphazardly, causing frequent shut downs and safety hazard for the residents of the area. They stressed that particularly, during the rainy season, the bare LT conductor became very dangerous, posing electrocution risk.

December 2007 FRT07V04HES-Addendum-RP Appendix A HESCO 6thSTG and ELR Project (2006-07) Resettlement Plan - Addendum

Are there any alternatives to open wires for electricity distribution (ie, bare LT conductor)?

The participants were not aware of any alternatives, however they generally thought the system should be improved in order to reduce the safety risk and power outages.

Participants' views on electricity theft:

None of the participants defended the electricity theft. High cost of living and excessive electricity billing were indicated to be the root cause of the theft of the energy.

Attitude of community members (for project): The community generally appreciated the project. They welcomed the HESCO's plans to improve the electricity network of the area.

Apprehension of cornrnunity about the project: Generally, no apprehensions were shared by the participants during the consultation meeting. Some of them however were of the view that the proposed project may cause increase in electricity tariff. Expectations of community about the project:

The community expected HESCO to consider the safety of the population and their privacy, while carrying out the works. The shopkeepers expected the works to be carried out in a manner that would cause least disturbance.

Names of stakeholders consulted:

b Mr. Yamin Soomro Councilor, UC-3, Qasimabad

b Mr. Punhal Sariyo Social and Political Activist

b Mr. Aijaz Ali Solangi CD shop owner

b Mr. Zakir Hussain Samo Herbal factory owner

b Mr. Bilawal Sariyo Shop keeper

b Mr. Ali Akbar Dayo Shop keeper

b Mr. Ramzan Ali Surhiyo Driver

b Mr. Safdar Ali Soomro Local resident

b Mr. lkram Ali Memon Local resident.

Consultation # 4 Date: 8LhSeptember 2007

City: Hyderabad Location: Citizen Colony

Number of Houses/Shops: 150 - 200

Population of Area (Approx): 2,500 - 3,000

December 2007 FRTON04HES-Addendum-RP

I Appendix A HESCO 6Ih STG and ELR Project (2006-07) Resettlement Plan -Addendum

What are the disadvantages of bare LT conductor? What is the current condition of the electricity network? The community was of the view that the bare electricity conductor was the major cause of electrocution accidents, which are quite common in the area. They further informed that some of these accidents were quite serious. They added that the situation became even worse in the rainy season. The participants complained about the existing condition of the HESCO system which caused power outages and frequent need of repair and maintenance. The electricity theft was also stated to be one of the outcomes of using the bare conductor in congested areas.

Are there any alternatives to open wires for electricity distribution (ie, bare LTconductor)? The community was not aware of any alternatives, however they strongly felt the existing situation should somehow be improved. Participants' views on electricity theft: The electricity theft was generally disliked by the participants. They attributed this practice to the soaring cost of living and high electricity tariff. Stricter rules enforcement could greatly address this menace, they opined.

Attitude of community members (for project):

The participants shared their appreciation for the project. They generally welcomed the project and felt that the area badly needed such initiative. Apprehension of community about the project:

Generally, the participants did not have any misgivings about the project. Some of the residents were slightly worried about the noise and disturbance caused by the project.

Expectations of community about the project: The participants expected the proposed project to alleviate their problems associated with the electricity network. 'They also hoped the project activities would not cause nuisance for them.

Names of stakeholders consulted:

b Ms. Noor Afroze Shoro Councilor UC-2, Qasimabad

b Mr. Lal Bux Jiskani Eminent writer

b Mr. Habib Ullah Leghari Local resident

b Mr. lmdad Hussain Memon Executive Engineer, WAPDA

b Mr. Naveed Memon Local resident.

Consultation # 5

Date: 8'h September 2007 City: Hyderabad Location: Tower Market Area

Number of HousedShops: 300 - 400

December 2007 FRTON04HES-Addendum-RP Appendix A HESCO 6'h STG and ELR Project (2006-07) Resettlement Plan - Addendum

Population ofArea (Approx): 5,000 - 6,000 What are the disadvantages of bare LT conductor? What is the current condition of the electricity network? The participants informed that in its existing condition, the electricity network in the area was very dangerous and prone to electrocution accidents. They added that the bare LT conductor was the main cause of such accidents, some of which have even proved to be fatal. The residents also informed about frequent power failures and low voltage problems due to the poor state of the transformers, and HT and LT networks. They were of the view that due to the bare LT conductor, electricity theft also became very easy and sometimes tempting. In the market area, the poor electricity system sometimes caused short-circuiting, in turn resulting in fire accidents and huge financial losses.

Are there any alternatives to open wires for electricity distribution (ie, bare LT conductor)?

Some of the participants indicated the under ground cabling to be one of the options available. However they understood it to be an expensive option.

Participants' views on electricity theff: The participants opined that high electricity tariff and excessive electricity billing were among the main reasons behind this phenomenon. They thought that effective rule enforcement could greatly address this problem.

Attitude of community members (for project): The community generally supported the project, as they perceived it to address their problems associated with the electricity network. They appreciated HESCO's plans to undertake such an initiative.

Apprehension of community about the project:

The community did not have any apprehension about the project. Some of the participants however thought that the electricity tariff could be increased as a result of the proposed project. They also worried about disruption to their business activities caused by the project construction activities. Expectations of community about the project: The community expected the HESCO's ELR project to address their problems associated with the electricity network. They hoped once the project was complete, the electrocution and short circuiting risks would be greatly reduced.

Names of stakeholders consulted:

b Mr. Zulfiqar lsmaili Local goods transporter Mr. Sultan Pathan Truck driver

b Mr. Gulab Khan Local transporter

b Mr. Bashir Ahrned Jatt Hair dresser

b Mr. Manthar Ali Hair dresser

b Mr. Mureed Abbass Dasti Hotel owner

December 2007 FRT07V04HES-Addendum-RP Appendix A HESCO 61h STG and ELR Project (2006-07) Resettlement Plan -Addendum

b Mr. Sohail Yousufzai Transporter

Consultation # 6 Date: aLhSeptember 2007 City: Hyderabad

Location: Prince Town, Qasimabad Number of HousedShops: 200 - 250 Population of Area (Approx): 4,500 - 5,000 What are the disadvantages of bare LT conductor? What is the current condition of the electricity network? In its existing condition, the participants shared, the electricity network in the area had become very old and obsolete, causing frequent shut downs and electrocution accidents. Mostly, the bare LT conductor was perceived to be the prime cause of such accidents, some of which have even proved to be fatal. The electricity consumers in the area also faced frequent power failures and low voltage problems due to the poor state of the transformers, and HT and LT networks. They added that in the commercial area, fire incidents occurred due to the electric short circuiting, causing huge financial losses. The bare conductor was cited as one of the reason for electricity theft.

Are there any alternatives to open wires for electricity distribution (ie, bare LTconductor)?

Some of the community members indicated the under ground cabling to be one of the options to address the existing problems associated with the LT network. Participants' views on electricity theft: The electricity theft was not defended by the participants, and they generally disliked the practice. They indicated that poverty, excessive electricity tariff and high electricity billing were among the main reasons behind this menace. In their opinion, better management and effective rule enforcement could go a long way in solving this problem.

Attitude of community members (for project):

The participants generally welcomed the HESCO's plans, however they were not very enthusiastic about the project. Apprehension of community about the project: The participants did not have any particular apprehension about the project. Some of the community members were slightly worried about the nuisance caused by the project.

Expectations of community about the project: The community did not have a lot of expectations from the project. However they still hoped the project would bring some improvement in the electricity system.

Names of stakeholders consulted:

b Mr. Manzoor Shaikh Private school owner

b Mr. Ahmed Shaikh Private school owner

December 2007 FRTON04HES-Addendum-RP Appendix A HESCO 6'h STG and ELR Project (2006-07) Resettlement Plan - Addendum

b Mr. M. Akram Rajpoot Mason

b Mr. M. Younus Rajpoot Mason

Consultation # 7

Date: 8thSeptember 2007 City: Hyderabad

Location: Latifabad 8-CI1

Number of Houseflhops: 300 - 400 Population of Area (Approx): 5,000 - 5,500 What are the disadvantages of bare LT conductor? What is the current condition of the electricity network? When asked about the state of the electricity network in the area, the participants responded that it had overgrown, and become very dangerous and prone to accidents such as electrocution and short circuiting. The bare LT conductor was stated to be the main cause of such accidents, some of which have quite serious. The area also faced frequent power failures and low voltage problems due to the poor condition of the electricity system. Electricity theft was also stated to be one of the outcomes of: the bare LT conductor. In the congested commercial areas, the poor electricity system sametimes caused short-circuiting, resulting in fire accidents and huge financial losses. Are there any alternatives to open wires for electricity distribution (ie, bare LT conducfor)?

The use of insulated cables was stated to be one of the alternatives to the existing bare LT conductor, as used in factories. However this option could be quite expensive, as pointed out by the participants.

Participants' views on electricity theft:

The electricity theft was not defended by the participants, and they generally disliked the practice. However they pointed out that the excessive electricity billing and poor enforcement of law were among the main reasons behind this practice. Poverty was also quoted to be one of the reasons for electricity theft. Attitude of community members (for project):

The participants generally welcomed the proposed project. They appreciated HESCO initiative to improve the electricity system in the area, which in their opinion was long over due.

Apprehension of community about the project:

Generally, the participants did not have any misgivings about the project. Some of the residents were slightly worried about the noise and disturbance caused by the project. Expectations of community about the project:

The participants expected that after the completion of the proposed project, their electricity related problems will be solved. They expected HESCO to take all safety precautions while carrying out the project works.

December 2007 FRTON04HES-Addendum-RP Appendix A HESCO 61h STG and ELR Project (2006-07) Resettlement Plan - Addendum

Names of stakeholders consulted:

b Mr. Syed Daniyal Hardware store

b Mr. Hakim Abdul Qayoom Hakeem (medical practitioner)

b Mr. Javed Akhtar Arain Shopkeeper

b Mr. Tasneem Bhatti Local resident

b Mr. Daulat Ram Local resident

b Mr. lmran Qazi Cable operator

b Dr. Abdul Hameed Psychologist.

Consultation # 8 Date: 8'h September 2007

City: Hyderabad Location: Hussainabad

Number of Houses/Shops: 100 - 150

Population of Area (Approx): 800 - 1,000

What are the disadvantages of open wires on poles?

What are the disadvantages of bare LT conductor? What is the current condition of the electricity network?

The participants pointed out that the electricity system in the area had overgrown haphazardly, and become very dangerous, causing electrocution and short circuiting. The bare LT conductor was perceived to be the main cause of such accidents. The community also complained about frequent power failures and low voltage problems due to the poor condition of the electricity system. The bare conductor was cited to be one of the main reasons of the electricity theft, though poverty and poor law enforcement were also indicated to be the root causes of this menace.

Are there any alternatives to open wires for electricity distribution (ie, bare LTconductor)? Some of the participants stated that the under ground cables could be considered, but they pointed out its high cost, which in their opinion, would ultimately compel HESCO to further increase the electricity tariff.

Participants' views on electricity theft: The prevailing poverty, high electricity tariff and excessive electricity billing were cited to be among the main reasons behind electricity theft. The participants opined that with effective rule enforcement, this problem could be greatly addressed.

Attitude of community members (for project): The overall attitude of the community towards the project was quite positive, and they generally welcomed the HESCO's initiative. They appreciated HESCO plans to improve the electricity system in the area, which in their opinion was in a very poor state.

December 2007 FRT07V04HES-Addendum-RP Appendix A HESCO 6'h STG and ELR Project (2006-07) Resettlement Plan - Addendum

Apprehension of community about the project: Generally, the participants did not share any apprehension about the project. Some of them however thought the proposed project might further increase the electricity rates.

Expectations of community about the project:

The participants expected the proposed project to solve the electricity-related problems faced by them. They also expected that the project works would not create disturbance or nuisance for them or safety hazard for their children.

Names of stakeholders consulted:

b Mr. Shabbir Chandio Newspaper hawker

b Mr. Hassan Sufi Cart owner

b Mr. Zubair Ahmed Mari Student

b Ms. Naheed Akhtar Housewife

b Mr. Musarat Jabeen Housewife

b Mr. Gul Bano Working women (teacher).

Consultation # 9 Date: 8thSeptember 2007 City: Hyderabad

Location: Taluka Nazim Office, Qasimabad

What are the disadvantages of bare LT conductor? What is the current condition of the electricity network?

The participants informed that the electricity system in the area was in a deplorable condition, and had overgrown haphazardly, thus becoming very dangerous and inefficient. The electricity-related accidents such as electrocution were quite common, and some of such accidents even proved to be fatal. The bare LT conductor was cited to be the main reason of such accidents. Electricity theft was also cited to be the direct result of the bare electricity conductor, though the participants pointed out that poverty and high electricity tariff were also the causes behind this problem.

Are there any alternatives to open wires for electricity distribution (ie, bare LT conductor)? The participants opined that the under ground and overhead cables were among the alternatives available. They pointed out that HESCO should consider these alternatives based upon their technical and financial feasibility.

Participants' views on electricity theft:

The participants were of the view that poverty and high tariff were among the main causes of the electricity theft. They however thought that with stricter law enforcement, this issue could be somewhat addressed.

December 2007 FRTON04HES-Addendum-RP Appendix A HESCO 6'h STG and ELR Project (2006-07) Resettlement Plan - Addendum

Attitude of community members (for project):

The participants were quite enthusiastic about the project and they welcomed it. They greatly appreciated HESCO's plans for electricity system improvement in the area, which was badly needed and long over due. Apprehension of community about the project:

The participants did not have any particular misgivings about the project. Some of them were however slightly worried about the disturbance and safety risks caused by the project.

Expectations of community about the project: The participants expected HESCO to alleviate their problems associated with the electricity network. They also expected HESCO and its contractors to take all safety measures to protect them from any nuisance or safety hazard during the project works.

Names of stakeholders consulted:

b Mr. Hyder Bux Shahani Taluka Naib Nazim, Qasimabad

b Mr. Mehboob Abro UC Nazim, Qasimabad

b Mr. G. Siddique Buriro ED0 Finance, District Government, Jamshoro

b Ms. Sadaf Ara Baloch Working women

Consultation # 10

Date: 8thSeptember 2007

City: Hyderabad Location: Latifabad No-2

Number of Houses/Shops: 200 - 300

Population of Area (Approx): 500 - 800

What are the disadvantages of bare LT conductor? What is the current condition of the electricity network?

The participants informed that the electricity network in the area was very old and expanded without much planning. This state of affairs caused frequent power outages while also resulted in electrocution accidents, sometimes even fatal. The bare LT conductor was mentioned as one of the prime causes of these problems. The participants added that in the commercial area, fire incidents sometimes occurred due to the electric short circuiting, causing huge financial losses. The electricity theft was also cited one of the outcomes of the bare electricity conductor. Are there any alternatives to open wires for electricity distribution (ie, bare LT conductor)?

The use of under ground cables was mentioned as the possible alternative to the bare electricity conductor. However the participants were aware of its high cost.

I e-LAN A-ll December 2007 FRT07V04HES-Addendum-RP Appendix A HESCO 6thSTG and ELR Project (2006-07) Resettlement Plan -Addendum

Participants' views on electricity theft: Generally, the participants did not defend electricity theft and disliked this ugly practice. Poverty and high electricity billing were among the main reasons cited for this menace. In their opinion, better management and effective rule enforcement could prove to be effective in addressing this issue. Attitude of community members (for project):

Most of the participants supported the proposed project. They appreciated HESCO's ELR project and viewed it a step in right direction. Some of the residents were however of the view that the proposed project would not positively affect them.

Apprehension of community about the project:

Generally, the participants did not have any apprehensions about the project.

Expectations of community about the project: The participants expected the proposed project to solve many of the electricity-related problems of the area. They hoped that with this project, HESCO would be able to reduce its losses, hence would be able to reduce the electricity tariff. They also expected HESCO and its contractors to take all safety measures during the project works. Names of stakeholders consulted:

b Mr. Adnan Alam Khan Local resident

b Mr. Akbar Ali Chisthi Local resident

b Mr. Nadeem Aamir Local resident

b Mr. Khurram Ali Local resident

b Mr. Rab Nawaz Local resident

b Mr. Tariq Rasheed Local resident

b Mr. Rehan Ashraf Local resident.

Consultation # 11

Date: gthSeptember 2007

City: Mirpur Khas Location: Noor Shah Colony

Number of Houses/Shops: 150 - 200

Population of Area (Approx): 1,000 - 1,200

What are the disadvantages of bare LT conductor? What is the current condition of the electricity network? The participant shared that the electricity system in the area was expanded without much planning, and had become very dangerous causing electrocution. For the electrocution accidents, they thought the bare conductor was the main reason. The people of the area also faced frequent power failures and low voltage problems due to the poor condition of

A-12 December 2007 FRTON04HES-Addendum-RP Appendix A HESCO 61h STG and ELR Project (2006-07) Resettlement Plan - Addendum

the transformers, and HT and LT networks. The bare conductor also encouraged the bad practice of electricity theft. In some of the congested areas, fire incidents were also not uncommon, caused by the electric short circuiting.

Are there any alternatives to open wires for electricity distribution (ie, bare LT conductor)? The participants did not have much idea about any alternatives to the existing systems, however they expected HESCO to consider all possibilities to address the current state of affairs which was causing them great anguish.

Participants' views on electricity theff:

The electricity theft was not defended by the participants, and they generally disliked the practice. However they pointed out that the extensive poverty and excessive electricity tariff were among the main reasons behind this practice. They thought that lowering of electricity tariff and effective law enforcement could positively address the problem to some extent. Attitude of community members (for project): The participants generally supported the proposed project. They appreciated HESCO's plans to address the problems associated with the electricity network of the area.

Apprehension of community about the project:

The participants generally did not have any particular misgivings about the project. Some of the residents were however slightly apprehensive about the possibility of the electricity tariff increase caused by the proposed project.

Expectations of community about the project: The community expected the HESCO's ELR project to address their sufferings caused by the poor state of the electricity network in the area. They hoped once the project was complete, the electrocution and short circuiting risks would be greatly reduced. They also expected HESCO to incorporate all standard safety precautions in the project activities.

Names of stakeholders consulted:

b Mr. Muhammad lsmail Mughal Dentor & painter

b Mr. Nasir Ali Raiput Transporter

b Mr. Abdul Rehman Pathan Driver

b Mr. Asif Kumbhar Rickshaw driver

b Mr. Muhammad lqbal Bajwa Landlord and influential

Consultation # 12

Date: gthSeptember 2007 City Mirpur Khas Location: Akbari Market

Number of Shops: 200 - 250

December 2007 FRTON04HES-Addendum-RP Appendix A HESCO 6'h STG and ELR Project (2006-07) Resettlement Plan - Addendum

Population of Area (Approx): 1,500 - 1,800 What are the disadvantages of bare LT conductor? What is the current condition of the electricity nefwork? The participant complained about the electricity system in the area and stated that it had overgrown without much planning, and had become very dangerous sometimes causing accidents such as electrocution. For such accidents, they thought the bare conductor was the main reason. The people of the area also greatly suffered because of frequent power failures and low voltage problems. The bare conductor was also cited to be the main reason behind electricity theft. In some of the congested areas, fire incidents also took place, caused by the electric short circuiting. Are there any alternatives to open wires for electricity distribution (ie, bare LT conductor)?

The community did not have knowledge about any alternatives to the existing systems, however they requested HESCO to somehow address the current state of affairs.

Participanfs' views on electricity theft:

Poverty and high electricity tariff were cited as the main reasons behind the electricity theft. The participants explained that the economic condition of the area was quite bad with most of the people living below the poverty line. For them it was very difficult to pay the electricity bill.

Attitude of community members (for project): The community generally supported the project, as they perceived it to address their problems associated with the electricity network. However some of them were somewhat indifferent about the project.

Apprehension of community about the project:

The participants did not have any particular apprehensions about the project. Sorne of them were however slightly worried about the safety risks caused by the project, particularly for their children. Expectations of community about the project:

The community expected the project to solve at least some of their electricity related problems. Some of the participants however did not have many expectations from the project, and some of them felt it would not affect them in any positive manner. Names of stakeholders consulted:

b Mr. Niaz Muhammad Leghari Petrol pump operator

b Mr. Mumtaz Leghari Rickshaw driver

b Mr. Javed Shah Transporter

b Mr. Allah Bachayo Transporter

b Mr. Gul Muhammad Leghari Industrialist

b Mr. Ali Akbar lbupoto Landlord

b Mr. Asghar Leghari Landlord

December 2007 FRTON04HES-Addendum-RP Appendix A HESCO 6'h STG and ELR Project (2006-07) Resettlement Plan - Addendum

Consultation # 13

Dafe: gthSeptember 2007

Cify: Mirpur Khas

Locafion: M. A Jinnah Road Number of Houses/Shops: 40 - 45

Populafion of Area (Approx): 300 - 350

Whaf are fhe disadvanfages of bare LT conducfor? What is fhe currenf condifion of the elecfricify network? The bare LT conductor was cited to be the main cause of the electrocution accidents, some of which have even proved to be fatal. According to the information provided by the participants, the existing electricity network had become very dangerous, with live conductors passing very close to the buildings, thus posing electrocution risk. The existing condition of the system also resulted in frequent electricity faults and shut downs. The bare LT conductor was also stated to be partly responsible for the menace of electricity theft.

Are there any alfernafives fo open wires for elecfricity distribufion (ie, bare LT conducfor)? The participants indicated the use of under ground cables as the possible alternative to the bare electricity conductor. However they were quite aware of its high cost.

Participanfs' views on elecfricify fheft: Lack of law enforcement was cited among the main reasons behind the electricity theft. In addition, widespread poverty was also a cause of this phenomenon.

Attifude of communify members (for projecf): The participants generally welcomed the HESCO's ELR project. They supported HESCO's plans to rehabilitate the electricity network in the area.

Apprehension of communify abouf fhe projecf: The participants were apprehensive about the high cost of the project and feared that it would cause the electricity tariff to be further increased.

Expectafions of communify abouf the projecf: The participants hoped that the proposed project would reduce some of their sufferings caused by the poor state of electricity network in the area. They also expected HESCO and its contractors to take all safety precautions while carrying out the project works.

Names of stakeholders consulfed:

b Mr. Ghulam Mustafa Ujjan Team leader - Sindh Irrigation - Development Authority

b Mr. Noor Nabi Jiskani Industrialist

b Mr. Fida Hussain Brohi Government official

b Mr. Naik Muhammad Baloch Local resident.

f eLAN- December 2007 FRTON04HES-Addendum-RP

-7,w%lqI.. --1~~+* . - Appendix A HESCO 6Ih STG and ELR Project (2006-07) Resettlement Plan - Addendum

Consultation # 14 Date: gthSeptember 2007

City: Mirpur Khas

Location: Police Shopping Centre

Number of HouseslShops: 30 - 40

Population of Area (Approx): 200 - 250

What are the disadvantages of bare LT conductor? What is the current condition of the electricity network? The participants shared their sufferings caused by the poor state of the electricity network in the area. The system, they informed, had over grown and become unmanageable. The power outages were very frequent, and primarily because of the bare conductor, electrocution accidents were also quite common, some of them proving to be even fatal. Electricity theft was also stated to be a direct result of the bare LT conductor. Are there any alternatives to open wires for electricity distribution (ie, bare LT conductor)?

The participants opined that the use of under ground cables was one of the alternatives available to address the bare conductor problem. They pointed out that HESCO should consider such alternatives based upon technical and financial feasibility.

Participants' views on electricity theft:

Poverty and high electricity tariff were cited as the main reasons behind theelectricity theft. The participants explained that the economic condition of the area was quite bad with most of the people living below the poverty line. For them it was very difiqult to pay the electricity bill. Poor law enforcement was also stated to be one of the causes of electricity theft.

Attitude of community members (for project):

The participants generally welcomed the HESCO's ELR project. They supported HESCO's plans to improve the electricity network in the area.

Apprehension of community about the project:

The participants generally did not have any particular apprehensions about the project. Some of the residents were however slightly concerned about the possibility of the disturbance and safety hazard caused by the project.

Expectations of community about the project:

The participants expected the proposed project to solve at least some of their sufferings caused by the electricity system of the area. 'They hoped that with the help af this project, HESCO would be able to reduce its losses, hence would be able to lower the electricity tariff. They also expected HESCO and its contractors to take all safety precautions while carrying out the project activities. Names of stakeholders consulted:

F Mr. Zubair Memon Shoe shop keeper

December 2007 FRTON04HES-Addendum-RP Appendix A HESCO 6'h STG and ELR Project (2006-07) Resettlement Plan -Addendum

b Mr. Nazeer Memon Spare parts dealer

b Mr. Ali Ahmed Memon Motor cycle dealer

Mr. Hameed Kaimkhani Landlord 8, Influential

b Mr. Dur Muhammad Local resident.

Consultation # 15

Date: 9Ih September 2007

City Mirpur Khas

Location: Baldia Shopping Centre

Number of Houses/Shops: 50 - 70

Population of Area (Approx): 250 - 300

What are the disadvantages of bare LT conductor? What is the current condition of the electricity network?

Much like the other areas visited before this meeting, residents of this locality also complained about the poor condition of the electricity network in the area. The system had over the years expanded haphazardly, without much planning, thus causing it to become unmanageable and prone to very frequent faults and trippings. The people also complained about voltage fluctuation and low voltage. The bare LT conductor was cited as the prime cause of many problems, such as electrocution and short circuiting, which sometimes resulted into fire accidents causing huge financial losses in the market area. In their opinion, the bare conductor was the key factor responsible for the electricity theft, though they felt there were other compelling reasons as well, such as poverty, poor law enforcement and society pressure. Are there any alternatives to open wires for electricity distribution (ie, bare LT conductor)?

Some of the participants mentioned using underground cables as one of the options to address the above mentioned problems. However they knew about its high cost, though they felt HESCO will have to take some decision sooner or later.

Participants' views on electricity theft: Generally, the community did not support the electricity theft, however they pointed out that the widespread poverty and excessive electricity tariff were among the compelling reasons behind this practice. In their opinion, this problem could be somewhat addressed by lowering the electricity tariff, and improving the earning levels of the masses. Attitude of community members (for project): The project was generally supported and welcomed by the participants, who appreciated HESCO's efforts to improve the existing dismal condition of the electricity network.

Apprehension of community about the project:

The participants did not share any apprehensions or reservations about the project.

, LAN e- A-17 December 2007 FRT07V04HES-Addendum-RP Appendix A HESCO 6'h STG and ELR Project (2006-07) Resettlement Plan - Addendum

Expectations of community about the project: The community expected HESCO to solve their problems associated with the electricity system. They also expected HESCO to reduce the electricity tariff once this project was completed.

Names of stakeholders consulted:

b Mr. Mumtaz Ali Mari Taluka Nazim, Darya Khan Mari

b Mr. Raees Ahmed Landlord

b Mr. Wajahat Ali Junejo Influential

b Mr. Qurban Mallah Laborer

b Mr. Yaseen Junejo Primary teacher

Consultation # 16

Date: 91h September 2007 City: Mirpur Khas

Location: Ghareeb Nawaz Colony

Number of HousedShops: 40 - 60

Population of Area (Approx): 300 - 500 What are the disadvantages of bare LT conductor? What is the current condition of the electricity network? The participants shared their difficulties caused by the electricity system in the area and stated that it was in an extremely poor condition, and was overgrown haphazardly, thus becoming very dangerous and prone to frequent power outages. They further shared that the electricity-related accidents such as electrocution were quite common, and some of such accidents even proved to be fatal. The bare LT conductor was perceived to be the main reason of such accidents. Electricity theft was also mentioned as the direct result of the bare conductor, though the participants pointed out that poor economic condition and expensive electricity were also among the causes behind this problem. Are there any alternatives to open wires for electricity distribution (ie, bare LT conductor)?

The participants were not aware of any alternative to the existing system. They however expected HESCO to do something positive to address the current situation. Participants' views on electricity theft:

Poverty was cited as the main reason behind the electricity theft. The people in the area were mostly belonging to middle and lower middle income groups, who find it very difficult to pay electricity bills.

Attitude of community members (for project): The community was quite supportive of the project, and they appreciated the HESCO's plans to improve the electricity network in the city.

December 2007 FRTONO~HES-A~~~~~U~-RP Appendix A HESCO 61h STG and ELR Project (2006-07) Resettlement Plan - Addendum

Expectations of community about the project:

The participants did not have any particular expectations from the project, however they hoped that it would rectify the poor condition of the LT feeders.

Names of stakeholders consulted:

b Mr. Rauf Mashori Local resident

b Mr. Murad Ali Junejo Local resident

b Mr. Akhtar Nabi Local resident

b Mr. Nand la1 Local resident

b Mr. Jagat Ram Local resident

Consultation # 17 Date: gthSeptember 2007 City Mirpur Khas

Location: Mirza Mansoor Baig Road

Number of Houses/Shops: 50 - 60

Population of Area (Approx): 300 - 350

What are the disadvantages of bare LT conductor? What is the current condition of the electricity network ?

The participants explained about the poor condition of the electricity network, which in their opinion was very dangerous causing many electrocution accidents. They added that the main culprit for such accidents was the bare electricity conductor, which sometimes passed very close to the buildings. This poor state of the electricity network resulted into frequent power disruption, voltage fluctuation and low voltage. Some of the participants pointed out that such condition of the electricity network would also cause excessive line losses. Are there any alternatives to open wires for electricity distribution (ie, bare LT conductor)? Underground and overhead cables were stated to be the options available. However the participants stressed that HESCO needs to determine the feasibility of such options. Participants' views on electricity theft:

The participants indicated the poor economic condition of the consumers and the high electricity tariff as the main reasons for electricity theft. They opined that effective law enforcement can solve the problem to some extent. Attitude of community members (for project): The community generally felt positively about the project, and appreciated HESCO's drive to address the electricity problems of the area.

December 2007 FRTON04HES-Addendum-RP Appendix A HESCO 6thSTG and ELR Project (2006-07) Resettlement Plan - Addendum

Apprehension of community about the project: The participants did not have any particular reservations about the project. Some of the residents however shared their concerns about the noise and disturbance which could be caused by the project.

Expectations of community about the project: The participants expected the HESCO's proposed ELR project to address the problems associated with the electricity network in the area. They also hoped that HESCO will take all necessary steps to protect them from noise and disturbance during the project works.

Names of stakeholders consulted:

b Mr. Raja Waqar Local Resident

b Mr. lmran Khan Awan Advocate

Mr. Malik Suhail Awan Advocate

b Dr. Ghazi Khan Doctor

b Haji Mumtaz Ali Local influential.

Consultation # 18 Date: gthSeptember 2007

City: Mirpur Khas

Location: New Town area

Number of Houses/Shops: 80 - 90

Population of Area (Approx): 900 - 1,000 What are the disadvantages of bare LT conductor? What is the current condition of the electricity network?

The community complained about the poor state of the LT feeders in the area, which was not only dangerous for the population but was also very inefficient and unreliable. The participants informed that the bare electricity conductor was the major reason for electrocution accidents, which are quite common in the area, particularly during the rainy season. They added that some of these accidents were quite serious. The electricity theft was also cited as one of the outcomes of using the bare conductor in congested areas.

Are there any alternatives to open wires for electricity distribution (ie, bare LT conductor)? The participants were not aware of any alternative to the existing system. They however hoped HESCO to choose an option which was technically as well as financially viable.

Participants' views on electricity theft:

The participants indicated that poor law enforcement on part of HESCO, and apparent and easy financial gains on part of the consumers were among the main reasons for the electricity theft. In their opinion, this problem was difficult to address.

Deoember 2007 FRTON04HES-Addendum-RP Appendix A HESCO 6Ih STG and ELR Project (2006-07) Resettlement Plan - Addendum

Attitude of community members (for project): The community generally felt positively about the project, however they were not very enthusiastic about the project. They nonetheless appreciated HESCO's plans to improve the electricity network condition of the area.

Apprehension of community about the project:

The participants did not have any particular apprehensions about the project. Some of the residents however shared their concerns about the possible high cost of the insulated cables, thus forcing HESCO to further increase the already-high electricity tariff.

Expectations of community about the project:

The participants hoped that the proposed project would reduce some of their difficulties associated with the poor state of electricity network in the area. They also expected HESCO and to keep the project cost within reasonable limits. Names of stakeholders consulted:

b Mr. Khalid Hussain Khawaja Local resident

b Mr. Tauffeq Ali Local resident

b Mr. Nazeer Ahmed Local resident

b Mr. Rashid Khalil Local resident

b Mr. Muhammad Mujtaba Local resident

Consultation # 19

Date: 91h September 2007

City: Mirpur Khas

Location: Green Market area

Number of Houses/Shops: 100 - 130

Population of Area (Approx): 1,500 - 1,800 What are the disadvantages of bare LT conductor? What is the current condition of the electricity network? The participants complained that the electricity network in the area had overgrown, and become unmanageable and prone to accidents such as electrocution and short circuiting. In their opinion, the bare LT conductor was the main cause of such accidents, some of which have even been fatal. The people of the area also faced frequent power failures and low voltage problems due to the poor condition of the electricity system. They added that the bare conductor also encouraged the electricity theft, which was common in some areas. They also informed that in the congested commercial areas, the poor electricity system sometimes caused short-circuiting, resulting in fire accidents and huge financial losses.

December 2007 FRTON04HES-Addendum-RP Appendix A HESCO 6Ih STG and ELR Project (2006-07) Resettlement Plan - Addendum

Are there any alternatives to open wires for electricity distribution (ie, bare LT conductor)? The participants did not share any alternative to the existing system. They however hoped HESCO to somehow improve the existing state of affairs.

Participants' views on electricity theft: The participants indicated that easy financial gains were the main reasons for the electricity theft. In their opinion, effective law enforcement could control this problem to some extent. Attitude of community members (for project):

The participants supported the project but otherwise they were somewhat indifferent about the project. Apprehension of community about the project: The participants did not have any particular reservations about the project. Some of the residents however shared their concerns about possibility of further increase in electric tariff once the project was implemented.

Expectations of community about the project:

The participants did not have high hopes about the project. They did not expect the project to have much impact on their lives. Names of stakeholders consulted:

Mr. Chacha Lal Bux Local resident and influential

Mr. Abdul Hadi Local resident and influential

Mr. Najam Uddin Sahito Local resident and influential

Mr. Wasif Ali Businessman.

Consultation # 20 Date: gthSeptember 2007 City: Mirpur Khas Location: Syed Farm area

Number of HouseslShops: 30 - 35

Population of Area (Approx): 400 - 500

What are the disadvantages of bare LT conductor? What is the current condition of the electricity network?

The participants generally described the poor condition of electricity network in the area. However they did not face any major problem caused by the bare LT conductors.

Are there any alternatives to open wires for electricity distribution (ie, bare LT conductor)? The participants did not feel the need to replace the bare conductor

, LAN e,, December 2007 FRT07V04HES-Addendum-RP Appendix A HESCO 6'h STG and ELR Project (2006-07) Resettlement Plan - Addendum

Participants' views on electricity theft:

The participants did not have much idea about electricity theft, but felt that easy monitory gains seemed to be the apparent cause of this practice.

Attitude of community members (for project):

The participants were not very enthusiastic about the project, since they thought the project was unlikely to benefit them.

Expectations of community about the project: The participants did not much interest in the project as they did not expect to benefit them. Names of stakeholders consulted:

Mr. Dakhan Baloch Local resident

b Mr. Aachar Khaskheli Local resident

b Mr. Sardar Shah Local resident

b Mr. Naib Pathan Local resident.

December 2007 FRTON04HES-Addendum-RP Appendix A HESCO 6'h STG and ELR Project (2006-07) Resettlement Plan - Addendum

A.2 Crop Compensation Details The compensation details for the crops that are likely to be damaged and trees that are likely to be removed during the transmission line rehabilitation activities are provided in this section.

Summary of CroplTree Compensation

Crop Damage Area Crop Tree Transmission (Acres) Number Of compensation compensation Line Affectees (1 acre = 0 4047 hectare) (Pak Rs.) (Pa k Rs.)

Mirpur Khas - 228.13 34 i 1,003,781 155,000 Sarnaro I - - Thatta - Cement 7.41 2 32,615 0 Factory I - Tando Moharnrnad 50.16 1 18 ; 220,720 50,000 Khan-Badin 1 I i I i Pano Aqil - Rohri : 37.52 i 4 i 165,000 i 35,000 ! I Guddu - Kandhkot 13.97 9 61.455 20,000

I Kashrnore - I 8.70 j 21 38,790 j 50,000 Shikarpur I II I Tando Moharnrnad Khan-BSKarirn i Kotri Powerhouse 23.28 7 102,425 25,000 - Thatta Thatta - Gharo 0.24 i 1,033 , 5,000 I . ( ...... Sujawal - Laduin 260.51 \ 42 1.144.827 190.000

Kandh Kot - Thull 2.58 14 1 1,362 55.000

Access Routes 32 1 Not 140,800 0

I known : Total 711.04 j 177 / 3,127,588 / 650,000 7 Grand Total I 3,777,588

Basis: For crop compensation, transmission line corridor has been taken as 30 m; crop compensation has been estimated for one wheat season, at the rate of Rs. 4,400 per acre per season. Land ownership data provided by HESCO.

December 2007 FRTON04HES-Addendum-RP Appendix A HESCO 6'h STG and ELR Project (2006-07) Resettlement Plan - Addendum

Mirpur Khas to Samaro Transmission Line Replacement of Tower

Tower I / 1 Tower 1 Access / Location / Landowner " : i Location Route Total Total i Rate / Amount ; I I i (15mX15m) ; (5mX50m) i (mZ) i (Acres) , (Rs) j (Rs) . . .:. . :.: : 189 1 Mir Fazlullah -----:. . 225 ...... i i j i i 219 i Shakeel i i 225 1 250 1 475 -...... I 268 1 M. HanifIGh. Qadir 225 250: 5......

!! 206 1 Khar M. ~hur~c 225 j 250 / 475 1 0:!2.-,! 4,400 1 516 j Sugar Mills Ali 239 1 Nawaz i 225 ( 250 1 475 / 0.12 1 4,400 , 516 - 1:

a The landowner details will be rechecked at the time of site mobilization and finalization of tower location (see Section 7.2 of the main RP for the implementation procedure).

Replacement of Conductor .I .: Span Corridor ; Total Total I Rate / Amount a Ln Landowner /I ;j I Width I j I . (m) (m) ! (m2) (Acres) (Rs) ( (Rs) / Haji Abdullah I I I I I 1 105-106 1 Lagari 1 I! 236 / 30 1 7,080 1 1.75 \--4,oci 7,698 8 ; Haji Abdullah j. 106-107 ! Lagari ----236 1 30 ; 7,080 j 1.75 / _4,400: 7.698 i Haii Abdullah , I i I07 -1 08 : ~agari 1 236 30 7,080 1.75 4.400 7,698 ------i------1 1 ; Haji Abdullah !j j ! ! 30 7,080 1.75 ( 7.698 --108-109 1 Lagari i-.-i--236E Ii i 1 _4,!~0! ., : , ! Ch Ghulam . : I 109-1 10 Muhammad .i 2 .j 236 / 30 7.080 ( 1.75 i-,,jJ4~~I 7.698 . .

--110-11 I Nazeer Ahmed 3 1 236 i 30 ' 7,080 j 1.75 1,>,400 : 7,698 .'! 1 g r 111-112/NazeerAhmed ,' 236 1 30 / 7,080 / 1.75 1-- 4,400 1 7,698 I i4i , 112-1 13 1 HajldJlRaheem 30 7,080 1 1.75 I,..-MOO . . 1: 113-114 Bobad Ram , 5 30 7.080 - 236 v--_--c 1 75 -4,400- a 7,698 / Sof~Muhammad , , i

114-115 . Din L---6 236 11*---- 30 7,080 1 75 4 400 : 7,698 I ' H- --?---r- -115-1 16 :~_al!!la_rn-_ L--_:I 7 ' 236--0~-_7,080 1 1 75 1-.._4,400!-__72~- 116-117 Khal~Meraj 8 2_36 30 -7,080 1 75 -4,40_0 7,698 117-1 18 - Khal~Meraj 236 7,080 ; 1 75 .Q400 7,698 236 _ 30 ' 7,080 1 75 _-3,3_OO 7,698

119-1 20-- )

120-121 , Khal~Meraj -, --- 236 30 b_7g0 I 1 75 , --4,4_0_0-, 7,698 , 1 I i 121-122 Khal~Meraj I i 236 i 30 j 7080 1 75 ?- 4.400: 7.698

236 30 7,080 1 75 4.400 7,698 -122-123---A Khal'_Meral_- - 7-- I 123-124 Abdul Ghaffar 9 236 / 30 7,080 1 75 . 4,400 , 7, 698 1 i 124-125 / Hafeez :lo/ 2361 30 j I

A-25 December 2007 FRTON04HES-Addendum-RP Appendix A HESCO 6thSTG and ELR Project (2006-07) Resettlement Plan -Addendum

Span j Corr~dor / Total t Total , Rate , Amount a Tower 1 Landowner s 8 width j i Locat~on, 8 --- i_ . - .___:-~m)-i (m) i C-(&E%L (RS) '-SR!1_- ' 7.080 I 1 75 , 4,400 7,698 . . .:. . 125-1 26 1 Haji Sardar i 11 : 236 ; - -- -...... - -.-. - ---. -- . 1 j :.i j 126-1 27 i Haji Sardar r:. s 236 1 I I i 127-128 1 Haji Sardar I 236 1 30 1 7.080 1 :.

128-129 Muhammad Moosa 1 12 : 236 ' 30 : 7,080 ' 1.75 i 4,400 7,698 ' I i i 129-130 ~- Muhammad M~!~K.I ; 130-131 j Muhammad Moosa I -----i 236 .i . ! ; 131-132 ' Muhammad Moosa i : 236 1 30 i-7-L088' 1.75 4,400 j 7,698 ----- I 1 !, 132-133T------, Muhammad Moosa . , 30 ?Lca~[ 1.75 ;.-,4.410 7.698 i :. ' I 150-151 Khalid Khaskheli ./ 13 ; 236 / 30 / 7,080 1.75 /--423q0) 7.698 .: .: 5 % . : i i -151--152- i Khalid Khaskheli I i 236 1 30 / 7.080 1 I .75 jnooi7,698 152-153 Khal~dKhaskhel~ 236 30 7,080 1 75 ,_%?!2? , 7,698 2 I I 153-154 a Khal~dKhaskhel~ /----! 236 1 30 -1,080 , 1 75 ' - - 4,400- : 7,698 I I 154-155 Khaltd Khaskhel~ 236 1 30 7,080 i 1 75 ._ ~P,4)'!-_---L 7 698

-----155-1 56 Khal~dKhaskhel~ 236 30 7,080 175 4,40_r) 7,698 i I 156-157 , Abdul Rasheed j 14 : 236 1 30 1 7,080 1 1 75 / 4,400 _' ! I1 157-158 Abdul Rasheed 1 / 236 1 30 7.080 1 1 75 1- ,400 / 7.698 158-159 Jan Muhammad 15 236 30 7,080 1 75 4,400 7,698 M KhanlAbdul

--160 -161 1 Rasheed , , A -161--162 -Rah~m Khan 17 236 30 7,080 75 -- 3,400 7,698 r162-1 63 Rah~mKhan I 236 ' 30 7,080 ' 1 75 - 4,400- 7,698 I 1 I 163-164 . Rah~mKhan 1 i 236 / 30 j 7,080 / 1.75 1 3,400L 7,698 164-1 65 Rah~mKhan 236 30 7,080 1 75 - 900 7,698 I 165-166 Nasrullah Talpur 18 236 I 30 7,080 ' 1.75 _-P,4PO 7,698 -- 1 I I I/ I / -166-167-i - NasrullahTalpur , , 236 1 30 -Z,080 1 I 75 4,400 7,698

167-168 A 236 30 1 75 -.3.400 7,698------Nasrullah------Taps-_ _72(380_, -___ I

168-169 Nasrullah Tapur- _ , 236 j 30 - 7,080 1 75 4,tqO 7,698 ------a

169-170 Nasrullah Talpur ! , 236 1 30 i 7,080 1 1 75 ' - 4,400 j 7,698 I 5 I

170-171 , Nasrullah Talpur , 236 1 30 , 7,080 ' 1.75 -440_0 j 7,698

171-172 Nasrullah Talpur 236 30 7.080 1 75 4.400 ' 7,698 , k f I 172-173 : Nasrullah Talpur 236 ' 30 7.080 i1.75, 4.400 1 8 I --173 --- 1-- 74 -- i Nasrullah_T_alp_ur--- - _ ,I 236 1 174-1 75 Nasrullah Talpur 236 30

A-26 December 2007 FRT07V04HES-Addendum-RP Appendix A HESCO 6'h STG and ELR Project (2006-07) Resettlement Plan - Addendum

. . Tower i i Span ( Corridor Total Total Rate Amount Landownera Width Location I I I -. : 7.080 i 1.75 ! 4.400 1 7.698

175-176 Nasruliah Talpur 236 --30 708j 1 75 -349 7,698-- :, 176-178 ; Nasruilah Tale I 236 1 30 , 7,080 [ 1.75 1 4,40 _0( 7,698 I I 1 179-180 Nasrullah Talpur !I 236 1 30 7.080 1.75 7.698 1 . . 1 1 1 44 ,

I I 191-192 ; Mir Fazlullah - 236 ;I 30 1- 7,080 [ 1.75 I", 4.400 1 7,698 : Khair Muhammad i : 192-193 : Bhurgn [ 21 1 236 ! 30 : 7,080 1 1.75 j 4,400 7,698 j hair:i 1 193-194 i Bhurgri i 1 236 / 30 j 7,080 1 1.75 1, 4.400 1 7,698 7 i Khair Muhammad 1 194-195 1 Bhurgri 1 236 30 7,080 1 1.75 1 4.400 7,698 i Khair Muhammad i j 195-196 i Bhugri :. 236 i 30 ' 7,080 j 1.75 4,400 j 7,698 I Khair Muhammad I ! I 30 ! 1L080-/ 1.75 i 4,400 7.698 -?a!~?~~!-_u_rgri...-: 1 i 36 I I . 1_ I Khair Muhammad 197-198 \ Bhurgri , - 236 30 : 1!089-.: 1.75 &!!?O..: -__7,698 i Khair Muhammad i 198-1LBh~rg~ _- 236 30 ,_-?Lie!_, 1 75 - 4,400 7,698 , Kharr Muhammad ' i I I 199-200 mr~ i 236 i 30 1 7,080 , 1 75 '-3420-1 7,698 ' Khair Muhammad i i I I i 200-201 / Bhurgri 1 236 1 30 1 7,080 1 1.75 1--2,400 ! 7,698 I Khair Muhammad , : . . ----201-202 : Bhurgri . : 236 1 30 1 7.080 / 1.75 !-.-4,400_! 7,698 ! i Khair Muhammad ; 202-203 i Bhurgri 236 30 ; 7,080 1.75 !-,-_4,4q0-: 7,698 I~ . . I I i . -203-204 1 .Bhurgri ._-L---; 2?!!Lp30/ ... 2!080-.~/... 4,40111--_ 7L6.98-. : Khair Muhammad ; i j 204-205 i Bhurgri :.i ' 236 ; 30 .-7e.1 1.75 '+$o-j 7.698 Khair Muhammad I I 7,698 205. -206 . / Bhurgri.-- .- 236 i Khair Muhammad j i 1 206-207 / Bhurgri .1 .: 236 i 30 1- 4,400~1 7,698 1 Khair Muhammad I ; I . , 207-208 / Bhurgri j: 236 / 30 / 7,080 / 1.75 / 4,400 j 7,698

Khair Muhammad : , 236 j 30 7,080 1.75 ;-_4r4010 7,698 --208-209 . Bhurgri ! j i ; i Khair Muhammad iii j 209-210 / Bhurgri .I .i 236 1 30 7.080 / 1.75 / 4,400 1 7.698 ; Khair Muhammad ' 210-211 i Bhurgri L---L 236 :. 1 211-212 j Pervez : 22 : 236 30 ?

A-27 December 2007 FRT07V04HES-Addendum-RP Appendix A HESCO 6'h STG and ELR Project (2006-07) Resettlement Plan - Addendum

I Span 1 Corridor : Total j Total j Rate ( Amount Tower Landownera i Width ; I Location i i . . , . :---i. . ' , _ . : . . 212-213 : Shakeel- .: 23 . 236 '1 30 _._2,080_! 1.75 i 4 L400 ' 7.698 -. -. -. -. -- --. . - -. :. ! i i ; ; 213-214 : DevaJ 24 ; 236 j 30 ; 7,080 / 1.75 /-$40(1 / 7,698 i i 214-215 1 Munnoo .1 .j 236 30 7.080 1.75 --4?!40 j 7,698 . . ! ! / j ! : ::. ! 215-216'Pe~ez .j .. 236 i 30 1 7,080 1.75 1 -4fiJO 7,698- 1 ' ! 216-217 \ Pe~ez I 236 30 7,080 1.7 0 7,698 -- .- ..-J. -...... - T- - --, -- -- 1 j 1 i 217-218 i PeNe= i 236 / 30 7,080 7.698 ; / ! 1.75 !--33!0 :. :. i j! 236 ] 30 7,080 / 1.75 1_-4,400,,! 7,698 218 -21 9LLS!3a_keelel_._-L.--_.-.--. : ' -. 4, i 219-220 : Pe~ez : I 236 4 400 1 7,698 _ .__,___ i z 1 cJ-,a_!tp-k-. 1.75 ..: 1 ! i 220-221 / Pewez i I 236 1 30 ) 7,080 1 1.75 [-4,400_ I 7,698 ;. I 1, ; .t . I I 221-222 : Shakeel :G :? 236 30 ! 7,080 1 1.75 1 4,400 7,698

222-223 : Shakeel 236 j 30 7,080 : 1.75 !-4,4~0 : 7,698 i : : : i ir. 1 223-224 1 Devaji : : 7,698 -_--__L_~. . .+-+-L~~1 30 7,080 1.75 1.. 4,400 !, 1 : : i I / 236 i 30 \ 7,080 1 1.75 i-4,400 1 7,698 - 224-225 ! Munnoo.______i__--__. 225-226 Munnoo 236 30 7,080 1 75 - 4,400 7,698 Shah Muhammad : ~ i I -226-- 227 Shar : 25 , 236 : 30 7,080 j I 75 4,400 7,698 I I +-- I ' -227-228 Mobln Shar j 26 , 236 30 7.080 / 1.75 f 4,400- I 7,698 Shah Muhammad 228-229 Shar 236 30 7,080 1 75 4.400 r 7,698 : Shah Muhammad : 229-230 ,Shar

--230 ---231 I Shar- - - - - Shah Muhammad --231 --232 -- Shar-- -- 236-- 30 -?$a<_ 1.75 --_4,400 ; 7,698 Shah Muhammad 232-233 Shar , 236 30 7,080 1 75 : 4,500: 7,698 i c I 1 i ----233-234 j Anwer AII K K 1 27 j 236 i 30 : 7,080 1 1 75 1- - _4,400 1 7,698 234-235 Anwer All K K 236- 30 7,080 1 75 -4.400 7.698 j 235-236 Anwer All K K 236 30 7,080 1 75 , 4,400 7,698 3 I , 1 8 5 --2361237 i An~verAllK K _ __ - - -- _ _-- 236 30 7,080 1.75 --4,4P_O --- 7,698 -237-238 -- Ta!e~rSugarM!!I~-?!- -_s------t 238-239 y_Talp_ucSuwV!II~ , 236 . 3L-7.080 175.-3400 7,698 8, 1, i 239-240 : Taipur Sugar M~lls , A30 236 ! 4,40__4_,40_O_! 7,698

240-241 , Talpur Sugar Mtlls 236 ; 30 , 7.080 ! 1 75 -_41400 : 7.698

241-242 Yaqoob Dhomkal . 29 236 30 7,080 1 75 &4_00 7,698

j I 242-243 , Yaqoob Dhomka~ ' 236 ! 30 , 7,080 / 1 75 ' 4,400 ' 7,698 ,---I--- 244-245 Pe~ezK K 236 30

A-28 December 2007 FRTONO~HES-Addendum-RP Appendix A HESCO 6th STG and ELR Project (2006-07) Resettlement Plan - Addendum

Tower 1 / Span i Corridor , Total / Total , Rate , Amount a I 1 Width i Location I Landowner !I i ..i.. 7.080 1.75 ; 4.400 ! 7.698 ...... -

-245 --246 -- Shabeer 3 1 236 30 J.080 175 _$%--__--7,698 I

. . 248-249 1 Shafique . . 236 ; 30 ! 7,080 1.75 '---4,4~0-; 7,698 249-250 ' Shafique : 236 / 30 7,08J-j. 1.75 '- 4,409-1- -7,698- 250-251 Mehmood Rajput 33 236 30 7,080 I75 -- 4,4!?0- 7,698 . . 251-252 ! Mehmood Rajput i 236 ! 30 1 7,080 1 1.75 4,400 1 7,698 252-253 j Mehmood ~aju -- --30 1 7,080 1 1.75 ~-~_4L4_~&~ 253-254 1 Mehmood Rajput 1 _I 236 / 30 i 7,080 J 1.75 [--_4,~_0_0i 7,698 --254 -255 i HajiSkkat 1 34 236 307-7.080: 1.75 !~4400 I 7,698 7 !, i i --255 -256 / HaJi Shokat 236 1 30 i 7,080 1.75 1 4,400--1 7,698 Trees i I 31 / i ~1 I / 5,000 ? 155,000 i: Total 1,155,682

Grand Total 34 228 13 1,158,781 " The landowner deta~lswill be rechecked at the tlrne of slte rnob~l~zat~on(see Section 7.2 of the rnaln RP for the ~rnplernentat~onprocedure)

Thatta to Thatta Cement Factory Transmission Line

I Tower Landownera 1 1 Span 1 C~~~~rTotal Total I Rate 1 Amount Location ' I I I 8 3 8 2 ! (m) ' (m) (m ) ' (Acres) 1 (Rs) ' (Rs)

--6 to 7- Ghulam Mustafa - 166 66- 30 5%!?0?!2- I 24 4,400 - 5,436-_ I

...... i 20 to 21 : Government - ...... - .. - .. t I 21 to 22 ; Government I !/ ...... i 22t023 1 Government 1 I ! 1 ------i-.------.L- I ...... iL -I 1 23 to 24 1 Government ! ! !

A-29 December 2007 FRT07V04HES-Addendum-RP Appendix A HESCO 61h STG and ELR Project (2006-07) Resettlement Plan - Addendum

. . ; f Span / 'Orridor I Landowner a Location ; 1 j Width 1 Total 1 Total 1 Rate : Amount i i (m) (m) . (mZ) i (Acres) : (Rs) (Rs) 24 to 25 : Government . .

...... -.-. 32 to 33 : Government . . -. . .r...... -...... -... . -. --- ..-. .r---.-- - I 33 to 34 ! Government i ! / ._ Ir--...... ---- 34 t 35 1 Government ! o .-L< I 35 to 36 i Government I 1 ! i : !.__ ...... __.& ' _ - 36 to 37 : Government .:. .

End i : i ...... ". - ...-.-. I__-___..._..____~! ; Trees ! 1 1 I j - . . Total 2 7 32,615 a The landowner details will be rechecked at the time of site mob~llzat~on(see Section 7.2 of the maln RP for the ~mplementat~onprocedure)

December 2007 FRTONO4HES-Addendum-RP Appendix A HESCO 6'h STG and ELR Project (2006-07) Resettlement Plan -Addendum

Tando Mohammad Khan to Badin Transmission Line

Replacement of Towers

- -- Tower , i 1 Tower ' Access I a Locat~on Land Owner : Locatlon 1 Route 1 Total 1 Total : Rate ' Amount (15mX15m) (5mX50m) (m2) (Acres) (Rs) (Rs) I 1 1 ! I 117 Haji Talib Soomro ! I 1 225 i Muhammad Bux I / 132 ( Nizamani i 21 225 1 250 475 0:1*) 4,400 1 516 . . i Manzoor Ali . . 3, ' ' 133 Nizamani 225 1 250 1 475 .' 0.12 1 4,400 516 : i 1 I I I 249 , Noor Muhammad / 4 1 225 1 516 ! i i I I 255 1 Patell Khaskheli i 5 1 225 1 250 1 475 0.12 / 4,400 / 516 ; i i I ! i i Total i 51 i 1 1 0.59 i ! 2,582 The landowner details will be rechecked at the time of site mobilization and finalization of tower location (see Section 7.2 of the main RP for the implementation procedure).

Replacement of Conductor

- Tower Corr~dor Locat~on Landowner " Span W~dth Total Total Rate ' Amount

i i 200-201 i Aslam Khuwaja 1 1 247.7 i 30 1 7,431 ,I 1.84 4,400 8,079

-202--203-- Aslam Khuwaja : 247.7 / _ 30 i 7,431 j 1.84 : 4,400 8,079 i Muhammad I i 2; 1 .84 4.400 ti 8.079 -~oLZ!!-. j .4~_s_m b ?--1 r-- i Muhammad 1 I i 204-205 ! Hashim I 2%?A------A.-- 30 i 7,431"- 1 1.84 1 4,400 / 8,079

205-206 Fazal Khuwaja , 206-207 Fazal Khuwaja

207-208 FazaI : 4' 208-209 : Syed Shah : 247.7 r 30 7,431 1.84 ! 4,400 8,079 -- - ... --- . -- .. .-- --- .- ...... -...... i .,.. -. - ,.1 - -- -.---: -- i i --209 -21- 0 1 Syed Shah .- -C-2_47.7\ 30 1 7.431 ",1 1.84 1 4,400 1 8,079

-- 210-211- - --- ~Ls~cs~L- I _1-~d----_- I 343:- L~L~-~,~OOL~~-OIE

211-212 , Syed Shah 2477 -_30_-11L43J- 1 84 4,400 8z

212-213 , Allah Judio 1.84 ! 4,400 8,079 -I-7 I I ! 213-214 ! Allah Judio 30 / 7,431 / 1.84 1 4.400 8.079

214-215 Ali Muhammad : 5 ; 247.7 '_ 30 ;-+fUj.-, 1.84 4.400 8.079 I 1.84 j 4,400 / 8,079 l.84 1 4,400 1 8,079 I ..217-218 : Muhammad.. Jorigo ---..---T-...- ! 8 ! 247.7 1 - - 30 ..1 7,431 . 1.84 , 4,400 1 8,079 218-219 Ghulam Mustafa 9 247.7 30 ; 7 431 1.84 4,400 8,079 / 1 , ,,; : / 1 I 219-220 i Essa Jurijo 1 10 1 247.7 / 30 /

A-31 December 2007 FRTON04HES-Addendum-RP Appendix A HESCO 6'h STG and ELR Project (2006-07) Resettlement Plan -Addendum

Tower ; j ! Corridor / i a Location j Landowner i Span 1 Width 1 Total , Total Rate 1 Amount (m) (m) (m2) (Acres) (Rs) (Rs) 7,431 1 84 4.400 8.079

220-221 . Ghulam Mustafa 247.7 / -- - .-._30_-.271-. 1 84 , 4,400 , , 8.079

...... So b.2.431-! 1.84 , 4,400 1 8,079 i ... 30 1/ -....- 7,431 1.84 ! 4,400 ) , 8,079 I 1 223-224 / Jaffri Advocate ' 2x4 30 / 7,431 1 1.84 ! 4,400 j 8,079

implementation procedure).

Pano Aquil to Rohri Transmission Line

Replacement of Conductor

Tower ' i Corr~dor Locat~on Landowner a Span W~dth Total * Total . Rate Amount 2 I (m) (m) (m ) (Acres) (Rs) ( Rs)

- -285 - Shahbaz-- - D~no- 136134 30 - 10,840 , _ 2.68 4,400 11,786 I I r-7- * ! 1 286-287 ' Ghulam Sarwar -2 I.. - 36: .34- / 30 : 10,840 ; 2.68 i 4,400 . 11,786 I ' I I I 288-289 Jamal Din Panhwer 1 3 1 361 34 1 301 10.840 2681 4,40O/ 11,786

290 Govt Land - 30 -- -- -.- 7- 361.34 --0 0 1 291 : Govt Land j ,.j _ 361.34.._...... ! 30 1 0 i 0 I r~ir oha am mad ! I i I i; --293 1 Masson I 4 I 361 34 i---- 30 1 10,840 1 2.68 1 4,400 1 11,786 Mlr Mohammad

-2'94 - J!aEon ------361 34 + 39 10.840 -___2 68 4,400 , -_l17J86- Mlr Mohammad '

December 2007 FRTON04HES-Addendum-RP Appendix A HESCO 6thSTG and ELR Project (2006-07) Resettlement Plan -Addendum

Tower ; , j Location! Landownera

303-304 Ra~lwayColony 361 34 30 0 0 , - , t ! I I 305 -Ra~lway Colony . : 361.34 ! 1 306-307 ; WAPDA IHESCO L/- 361.34 ! 301 101 i 0

Trees 7 0 , 5,000 35,000 I I i I I I 1 : Total ; 4 j 6,865.46 1 i 37.52 1 / 200,004 " The landowner details will be rechecked at the time of site mobilization (see Section 7.2 of the main RP for the implementation procedure).

Kashmore to Kandh Kot (Guddu-Kandh Kot) Transmission Line

Towers to be Replaced

I Tower Tower Access I Locat~on Land Owner a Locat~on Route Total Total ' Rate , Amount (15mX15m) ! (5mX50m) (rn2) j (Acres) : (Rs) . (Rs) I I / I I I I i - --3 ' Haj~~bdui- - Rauf _I__I i 225 ' 250 j 475 I 0.12 / 4.400 i 516

4 Haji Abdul Rauf , 250 , 475 0.12 4,400 516 225 . -- , I 7 , Abdul Rasool 2-, 225 --250 ' 475 1 0.12 ' 4,400 / 516 Mohammad i 1 ! 1 112 ' Asghar i 3: 225 --250 1 475 / 0 12 1 4.400 / 516

138 , Kamal Khan Golo 4 225 250 475 0.12 4.400 51 6 I I I I i I I Total 4 8 1 0.59 1 1 2,582 " The landowner details will be rechecked at the time of site mobilization and finalization of tower location (see Section 7.2 of the main RP for the implementation procedure).

Conductor Replacement

, ! Tower , : Corr~dor : \ Locat~on Landowner a 1 Span : W~dth : Total Total I Rate Amount (m) (rn) (m2) (Acres) (Rs) (Rs) I

168-169 , Hall All Sher Goio 3 ; -_-- 361 _ _ - 30 , 10.830 2 68 i 4,400 , 11,775 Ha11Mohammad 1

173-174 Shareef 4 - 36_'_. - --30 1!,830 + 2 68 I 4,400 , 11,775 8, I

174-175 i Sarfraz Khan 151...... 361 *.1 . ....30 -.:. 1 lJ,830-/ 2.68 / 4,400 1 11,775 . , I I ' Trees 4 ! I 5,000 20,000 I I! ! i !

: : Grand Total '9 : i 13.97 i 1 81,455 a The landowner details will be rechecked at the time of site mobilization (see Section 7.2 of the main RP for the implementation procedure).

December 2007 FRTON04HES-Addendum-RP

Appendix A HESCO 6Ih STG and ELR Project (2006-07) Resettlement Plan - Addendum

Tando Mohammad Khan to B S Karim Transmission Line

Tower Replacement

3 Tower Tower . Access , I Locat~on : Land Owner " Locat~on i Route Total : Total ; Rate i Amount

38 Sajjan Detho 1 222 250 475 0 12 4,400 516- I, 1 62 ; Murtaza : 2i 225 1 250 475. 0124,400~ 516 I3 73 : Shokat Jatt l3. 225 j 250 4751 012!4,400: 516

80 Abdul Raheem 4 225 250 475 012~4,400' 516 I She~khRlag _ 225 ' 012j4,4001 516-

8 250 475 i 0 12 1 4,400 , 5(6-

--9L _Sayood Ahmed-_-7-_ 7_ -? 250 475- 0 12 4,400 516 :Ti--- Abdul Raheem ' 225 , 250 475 , 0 12 / 4,400 , 516 I I h lei 225 250 475 1 o 12 I 4,400 513- 147 Muhammad Umer 9 225 250 475 0 12 4,400 516

225

- -- Muhammad ---168 -Samoon ------225 250 475 0 12 4,400 516 Muhammad All 133 Lashar~ 225 ' 250 ' 475 ' 0 12 j 4,400 8 516 ! i t- i i Total i 12 j 1 1.64 1 1 7,230 " The landowner details will be rechecked at the time of site mobilization and finalization of tower location (see Section 7.2 of the main RP for the implementation prwedure).

Conductor Replacement

I Tower t Corr~dor Location Landowner " Span W~dth Total , Total Rate Amount I j I (m) I (m) i (m2) I (Acres) i (RS) i (~$1 . . 119-120 l Azizullah 1. 232.95 ; 30 : 6,989.... _.! 1.73 : 4,400 7,598 .; . _ : :. i, I i 3. 120-121 ! Azizullah ' 232.95: 30]6.?~?ir-' 1.73; 4,400 1' 30 is!?*?,./ 1.73 ! 4.400 1 7,598 :.

-122-123 Asadullah 2 , 232 95 : 30 6,989 1 73 , 4,400 7,598

--123-124 Asadullah 232 95 30 6:989_ T i' ; I j I 124-125 ! Asadullah 23295 / 30 / 6.989 i 1 73 / 4,400 7.598

126-127~-bk~!u~sheem- ., -?32G!LL A!?; 6,989j33 I 4.400 F-7.598 1 127-128 i AbduI Raheem .-

128-129 ! Abdul Raheem 232.95 , 30 ,- 6,989--* 1.73 4,400 j 7,598 129-1 30 Abdul Raheem 23295 1 30 '

A-35 December 2007 FRTON04HES-Addendum-RP Appendix A HESCO 6Ih STG and ELR Project (2006-07) Resettlement Plan - Addendum

. . ; $ - Tower j i j 1 Corridor I i 1 Location i Landownera I Span / Width i Total 1 Total i Rate Amount :. : : (rn) (m) ! (rn2) i (Acres) , (Rs) . (Rs) ! : ' , 1 6,989 ) 1.73 1 4,400 / 7,598 _-___.-...... <. 130-131 Abdul Raheem . r 232.95 30 ...... 6,989 _.. 1.73 4,400 7,598 - ; 1 , : : $ i ; i 131-132 i AbduI Raheem 232.95 30 /6i98S, 1.73 / 4.400 / 7,598 1r : 1 J1-L.;ashar- 1 4 1 232.95 1 7-6,EB91 1.73 4,400 1 7,598 :. 133-134 ; M.AIi Lashar : . 232.95 ' 30 ...... ' 6,989 1 1.73 1 4,400 7,598 . . $ i ! ' 144-145 Abdul Raheem- i 5 , 232.95 1 30 6,L989.-] 1.73 ! 4,400 ! 7,598 , -1 i I i 145-146 i.I\MuI Raheem ! 1 232.95 1 30 [.-6!989.../ 1.73 4,400 j 7.598 . . . : : :. . : 146-147 / M.Umer - ,1 6 ! 232.95 1 30 ...... 6,989 ] 1.73 1 4.400 7 598 ; : :. i 147-148 i M.Umer - 1 ; 232.95 1 30 1-6:989 1 1.73 4,400 / 7,598 i I 1 232.951 148-149 1 M.Umer 30 !5,989/ 1.73 1 4.400 / 7.59% .:. . --149-150 -.- - .... --Adam ... Samoon.. ... -*i 7 : 232.95 ?_ 30 ,,,6,:989--- 1.73 4.400 1 7,598- ' , , i 150-151 --i- i Shafi ~uhammad--1.. r.--7-p-- 8 , 232.95 1 30 L,..P,989,.jc------1.73 7,598 i I I 15 1-1 52&~li~awaz...... 1 9 i 232.95 .... 6$89..,! j 1.73 4.400 1 , 7,598 . . 1 . . 1 34 ! 152-153 1 Abdul Razzak i 10 j 232.95 ; 30 1 6,989....._.. . 1.73 1 4,400 ! 7,598 I

153-154 j Ahmed Samoon 11 232.95 1 30 i ,,,., 6?9~-; 1.73 . 4,400 ! 7,598 :* *; ! !! i 154-155 ! Abdul Latif r2 ; 232.95 30 ..62989.,j 4,400 7,598 ___i__-______- 1 1 j . < i ? j : j i j Trees i: 13 i 5,000 i 65,000 1 i ; I i I I pppp--.- I Total 1 12 / 6056.7 1 [ ...... 1 44.90 1 j 262,550 j r ! j g i / Grand Total 1 24 : i / 46.54 i ! 269,780 a The landowner details will be rechecked at the time of site mobilization (see Section 7.2 of the main RP for the implementation procedure).

Kotri Power House to Thatta Transmission Line Tower Replacement

Allah Dino 192 Jakhro 4 225 250 475 012 4,400 516 I I 8

Total 4 0.47 1 3 2,066 " The landowner detalls w!ll be rechecked at the tlme of slte mob~l~zattonand finallzatlon of tower locatlon (see Section 7.2 of the main RP for the lrnplementatlonprocedure)

December 2007 FRT07V04HES-Addendum-RP Appendix A HESCO 61h STG and ELR Project (2006-07) Resettlement Plan -Addendum

Conductor Replacement I i I I Tower 1 !I i Corridor i i Location j Landowner a I Span Width ! Total j Total 1 Rate Amount (rn ) ( rn) (m2) (Acres) (Rs) (Rs) 12' 144-145 A&ar Jokhio I 1 256 41 30 ' 7,692 : i------i--r -145-146 1 Akbar Jokhio ( I 256.41 1 30 1 7,692 1 1.90 / 146-147 Akbar Jokhlo 256 41 30 7,692 .- 1.90 I --147-148- / Akbar Jokhio / I 184-185 1 Qaslrn Narejo / 2 ( 256 41 1 30 / 7,692 1 1 90 : 4,400 / 8.363

: 5 185-186 ' Qasim Narejo ' . ------r--' I 186-1 87 , Qasim Narelo- 256.41 I 30 1 7,692 1 1 90 4,400 8,363 I 1 1 187-188 i Qasim Narejo 256.41 30 7,692 1.90 4.400 8,363 -L_--- .1 .1 i 1 / ,; ;j 188-189 , Qasim Narejo i : 256 41 j 30 7,692, 1 90 , 4,400 / 8,363 I : I 189-190 j Qaslm Narejo 256.41 30 I 7 ,692 1 90 4.400 1 8,363 -Allah Dlno i , : I 190-191 1 Jakhro 1 3 ( 256.41 1 30 7,692 1.90 4,400 1 8,363 j Allah Dino ! I 191-192 / Jakhro 1 256.41 1 30 ! 7.692 1.90 1 4,400 j 8,36A :.: : Trees 5 5,000 25,000

, Total j 3 3076.92 1 c 22.81 , 125,359 I! I i- I Grand Total 1 7 1 ! 23.28 , 127,425 " The landowner details will be rechecked at the tlme of s~tem0billzatlOn (see Section 7.2 of the maln RP for the implementation procedure).

Thatta - Gharo Transmission Line Tower replacement

Tower Tower i i Location I Land Mara / Location 1 ~~~~~ 1 Total ) Total 1 Rate Amount 2 j / (15mX15m) I (5mX50rn) . (rn ) , (Acres) j (Rs) i (Rs) ! 3 : Ghulam Qad~r 250 475 ' 0 12 ' 4,400 ' / Fatan & Khan -t--t- 32 jharnrnad 250 475 b1~i-~340(!-1 --YL

: Trees 1 I' 0 t 5,000 : 5,000

Total 2 0.24 6,033 " The landowner details will be rechecked at the time of site mob~lizationand finalization of tower location (see Section 7.2 of the main RP for the implementation procedure)

December 2007 FRT07V04HES-Addendum-RP Appendix A HESCO 61h STG and ELR Project (2006-07) Resettlement Plan -Addendum

Sajawal - Laduin Transmission Line Conductor Replacement I i Tower i I Corridor i I Location 1 Landownera I Span ! Width 1 Total I Total 1 Rate ; Amount (m) ' (m) I (m2) i (Acres) j (Rs) i (Rs) . . .<. . , , ! '1 i 322 1. 30 . 9,6601 2.39i:-, . sheikh.----______1 ::4%: 1{C)::5: 2 rRamzan Sheikh j 2 322 1 30 L 9.660 1 2.39

19 Essan Shah .] ., 322 i 30 ".i . 9,660 j 2.39 ; 4,400 10,503 ; :. I ! I

20 I(_ 322 30 .1 __9.660__- 2.39 , 4,400 10,503 .;--€Erlshah I I 1 ! -r' 1 i i I 21 SarnSamoon 1 8 322 301 9.660 2.39 4.4CIei 10,503 -. -?- ... 1 ' . . 22 ... j Sadiq Samoon . 322 ; 30 i .9,660 ._1 2.39 1 4,400 . lo,, ! / 23 ! Sadiq Samoon . 322 1 3o \ 9,66!!-; 2.39 i I \ i j i . 24 / Guhulam Ahmmi 9:6602.39 :.

, .: : ::. : I i 322 i 28 i M.Samoon : s 30-_-- 9,660 i 2.39 1 4,400 j 10,503 i ; i 29 Yousaf Soomro 12 : 322 30 1 --926A0.-' 2.39 : 4,400 10,503 . . !------i i ! I 30 / YousafSoomro 1 322 / 30 1 9,660 1 2.39 1 4,400 / 10,503

A-38 December 2007 FRTON04HES-Addendum-RP Appendix A HESCO 61h STG and ELR Project (2006-07) Resettlement Plan -Addendum

j i Tower 1 i Corridor I I 1 a Location Landowner I Span / Width 1 Total I Total 1 Rate i Amount , 31 I Govt L1 I I I i'- - 32 1 Govt i 0 33 ; Ahmed Khan i 13 322 ! 30- 1 9,660 -1 2.39 ; 4,400 1 10,503 !

34 M Husain Leghari 1 14 322 30 1 ...... 9,660 - + 2.39 4,400 10,503 I__-_r.. 1 35 1 MLusain Leghari 322 I8 301 3660-, 2.39 1 4,400 10,503 j 36 1 M Husain Leghari f 322 30 9 660 . 2.39 - ._ ~- 10.503 --1 Lj .... .! .... a j 4.400 1 37 , M Husain Leghari 9660 2.39 4.400 10,503 ...... ! *'- - 1 ,i ! i 38 1 M Husain Leghari I - 2.39 i 4,400 iI 10,503 i Allah Dino I I I 39 1 Leghari ] 15 322 i 301--,l,6601 2.39 1 4,400 ! 10,503 40 ' Hafeez i 16 322 ! 3_0-,..- 9,630 2.39 j 4,400 ! 10,503 i i ! I ' Hafeez 322 1 30 i,--9m1 2.39 ; 4.400 i 1o.soJO +- I 42 1 Yameen 1 17 ~~3,-BLEE6_0]2.39 4.400 1 10,503 ---43 ' Yameen --- - 322 . 30 .-.... 9,660 .. 1 2.39 : 4,400 10.503 I i 44 Yameen -~-& ' - - i Ghulam rI8 I 45 Muhammad 322 1 : Ghulam 46 Muhammad ' -322- i 30 1 9&6_60 1 2.39 4,400 ; 10,503 I Ghulam I I i 47 / Muhammad 322 i 30 1 ....-...... 9,660 / 2.39 ' 4,400 / 10,503 48 . Basar Lund 19 322,--9.6601 2.39 1 4,400 1 10,503

49 i Basar Lund 322 ! 30 L~! . .9,660 - - 1 2.39 ! 4,400 10,503

- 50 1 Gul Hussain ,i 20

.. .. 51 .. i Gul Hussain

52 : Gul Hussain ! 322 ] 30 ;j 9 660 2.39 4,400 10,503 -- , - ...... r .... 1 ! 1 I i 53 ; Gul Hussain 322 ! 30 96 2.39 4.400 lO.5E I / i 54 Govt 1 ...... i 55 i Govt 322 30 92..- 660 o 0 1 1 P ! i 56 .- ! Gul Hassan 322 303 .. 9,660 1 2.39 i_' 4 400 1 10,503 I 57 Gul Hassan 322 1 30_j 9!660-)39 1 4,400 ] 10,503 i i 58 Gul Hassan - 322 ! 30 1 9,660 2.39 4,400 i 10,503 59 ; RiazShah 21 322 1 30 99.66- 2.39 4.400 : 10.503 j 60 1 Riaz Shah 322 1 30 .1 9,660- 1 2.39 1 4,400 1 10,503

61 1 RiazShah I 2 30 ! ,-g!?k5c.l 2.39 / 4.400 1 10,503 62 : RiazShah 322 ; 30i"_-9,660 . 2.39 4,460 ; 10,503 i 63 : Riaz Shah 322 / 30 / 9.660 / 2.39 1 4.400 / 10,503

A-39 December 2007 FRTON04HES-Addendum-RP Appendix A HESCO 6'h STG and ELR Project (2006-07) Resettlement Plan - Addendum

Tower ! ! I ; Corr~dorj i i a Locat~on , Landowner ! : Span W~dth ! Total : Total / Rate I Amount (m) (m) (m2) (Acres) (Rs) (Rs) . I j ! I -64- : Riar Shah 322 i 30 1. 9.660_1.39 I 4,400 10,503 ! 322 i 30 1 9.!.6_60_.-1 2.391 4,400 1 10.503 . .

- 76 -__---f---l.....--...... ------' 322 f 30 j 9,660 1 0 ' ipp0 ; I 1 77 i Govt i j :3..9!"".1 o ! ! 0 1 78 M Husain 29 I 322 1 __ 2.39 4.400 10,503 / 322 9.660, 1 . . .:. . . .: 79 i M Husain : 322 / 32 3660 2.39 4,400 1 10,503 . . - i i i . a 80 M Husain ; , 322 2.39 1 4,400 10,503 I 81 M Hassan Rind 30 1 322 :g 229 4,400 20,503 82 i M Hassan Rind . 322 ; 30 i 9,660 1 2.39 1 4.400 ; 10,503 ----- &_. .. ______- . , ., . I I 83 M Hassan Rind 322 30 9,660-1 2.39 I 4,400 ! 1015_OL i I I i I I _-84- ~~~~~_amald~__.~.-?1_~--?22i.:. . 2-l. 9 !66?..C-2:3!--5%. i-.1!-503 . .' 85 j Haji Kamaldin 322 ! 30 j...-, 9,660-i 2.39 ; 4,400 i 10,503 ,:, , : --86 1 Haji Kamaldin , 322 i 30 .!,9.666, 2.39 / 4.400 1 10,503 i i 87 Haji Misri Rind / 32 1 322 30 9.660 2.39 I 4,400 j__?O,503 / 1 ,1. ... .- 1 . . 88 ; Haji Misri Rind ; 322--- ! 30 1 9,660- ; 2.39 4,400 j 10,503 j 89 Haji Misri Rind :---:' -._..-. Z2..; 3(Li 9,660 ; ~39-j__.4s400-~10,503- ! 7 j j ! 90 Allah Jurio Rind 33 1! 322 30 i--9!660-! 2.39 1 4.400 / 10.503 I ! I ! 91 S~krarn i 34 i 322 ! 30 1 9,660.. / 2.39 4.400 i 10,503 -

92 ; Fazal Rehman i 35 322 :- 3&.,. .9,660,,. 2.39 . 4.400 10,503 i 3 I j I i i 93 1 Fazal Rehman i 322 ! -2049,660.j 2.39 1 4,400 10,503 I - I . 94 1 FaeRehman I I 322 / . . 3d9~i 2.39 4,400 1 10.503

95 : Fazal Rehrnan ; : 322 30 9,660 2.39 ; 4,400 i 10,503 i E ! I ! 96 1 Haji Sawan 1 36 1 322 / 30 i 9,660 / 2.39 f 4,400 1 10.503

A-40 December 2007 FRTON04HES-Addendum-RP Appendix A HESCO 6'h STG and ELR Project (2006-07) Resettlement Plan - Addendum

Tower ! I Corr~dorI ! I t Locatlon Landownera j ! Span i Wldth 1 Total ; Total i Rate / Amount 1(Rs) 97 j AbdulRehman > 322 : 34 9.660 L-2 39 ; 4,!l! 10,503 I I I I--! r- 98 AbdulRehman 1 1 322 1 3 ,,9 2.39 / 4,400 1 10,503 j ;

1 322 1 30 ' 926611; 2.39 4,400 i 10,503 1 '1 i I : : I i Ashraf Khaskheli 1 322 / 3 2.39 4.400 / 10.503 I i +-108 / Ashraf Khaskheli 1 1 322 30 9,6600/ 2.39 4,400 10,503 . . L / / .:. . -- 109 Ashraf Khaskheli i 322 i 30 : 9,660- . --- 2.39 j 4,400 10.503 i ; i I .- LealChandio 41 322 30 /-srsd2.39 1 4,400 10,503 1 1 r---r 1I1 lqbal Chandio 322 301-9~! 2.39 i 4.400 1 10.503 ...... 112 i lqbai Chandio i 322 / 30 9 2.39 4,400 ! 10,503 . > 1 i H3 1 Ghulam Mustafa i 42 i 322 1 30 2.39 I 4.400 / 10,503 114 Ghulam Mustafa 1 322 . .

115~ -..-....---.____-.----7_-- . Ghulam Mustafa : 322 I1 30 1 9660!. ;-LL 1 2.39 1 4400 1 10,503 !, .' 1 I 7- 116 1 Ghulam Mustafa 322 i 30 j9!,65? ,,I!,I! ,lii39 i--f--- / 4.400 1 10,503 ! ; i .. . 9 4,400~~~10.503660

118 , Ghulam Mustafa , , 322 30 9 660 2 39 , 4,400 : 10,503 7--2-- 3 - 11 9 Ghulam Mustafa ' 322 30 9660 / 2 39 4.400 10.503 --q- '--- 7-1 i 1 ' Trees 38: 1 i / 5,000 1 190,000 I Total , 42 38,318 : : 260.51 1 1,334,827 " The landowner detalls wlll be rechecked at the tlme of slte rnob~l~zat~on(see Section 7.2 of the maln RP for the implementation procedure)

Kandh Kot - Thull Transmission Line Tower Replacement dTower i i Tower Access i Location LandOwnera 1 ! Location 1 Route j Total Total j Rate !Amount I (15mX15m) (5mX50rn) ! (m2) ] (Acres) (Rs) (Rs) .I . I 1 I 1 i I I 7 1 Badaruddin ) 1 / 225 p50( 475 1 I 4,400 516

I LAN e- A41 December 2007 FRT07V04HES-Addendum-RP Appendix A HESCO €ithSTG and ELR Project (2006-07) Resettlement Plan - Addenldum

. . i i Tower 1 i i Tower i Access I ! Location 1 Land Owner a I 1 Location 1 Route 1 Total / Total / Rate Amount i (15rnX15m) ; (5mX50rn) : (m2) i (Acres) ; (Rs) ': (Rs)

/ Ramazan s , .. - j 1 - - ...... L.------.-. 475 ; 0.12 4,400 / -- -. 516--- .

.:. . 39 i Sobho Khan ; 3 : . 250 j 475 : 0.12 . 4,400 516 7-i i 225 L I ---40 j SobhoKhan 1 225 I...... 250 1 4=1 0.12 1 4,400 516 I 1

41 Sobho Khan 1 , 225 ; 250 ,r475 0.12 4,400 516 . . 1 1 ) .:. . 71 Mazar Khan : 4 : 225 : 250 i 475 ! 0.12 ; 4,400 516 I! i j 1 0.12 i 4,400 / 516 0.12 1 4.400 1 516 Ali mUrad i i I i 102 ! Jatoi !: 7' 225 1r-.----.---- 250 1 475 0.12 ] 4,400 : 516 Village Rahim I ( jpT 117 i a! -----4 225 j --128 1 Dolat jatoi :. >. : : 2. 132-. - /,..S~d~,,K~~--j10 ! 225-i. 250...... / 475 . 0.12 . 4,400 : - ..-.516 ! Mohammad r- I 141 1 Moosa 11 I r--;;--I 0.12 1 4,400 516 Moharnrnad 1 i f -- I I 225 . i i / ?s!?-.L-A!~~0.12 1 4,400 i! 1 i 144 i Mohammd 1 12 [ 225 j 250 1 475 . 0.12 . 4,400 ! 516 1 Faiz i 1 i 145 1 Mohamrnd 1 I 250 475 i 0.12 4,400 / 516 i I : : 168 !AzizJan 1131 225 1... 250 475 0.12 4,400 516 : '; 1 / 1 i i I

172!; :I 225 : 250 ( 47%: 0.12 4.400 516 . . .. .-.

- ...... : :. ; Trees i 11 ' i 5,000 55,000 1 1 1 ) Total I! 14 ! 4950 1 1 2.58 i i 66,362 " ' The landowner details will be rechecked at the time of site mobilization and finalization of tower location (see Section 7.2 of the main RP for the implementation procedure).

December 2007 FRTON04HES-Adoendurn-RP