University at Albany, State University of New York Scholars Archive Philosophy Faculty Scholarship Philosophy Fall 2013 Judging Covers P.D. Magnus University at Albany, State University of New York,
[email protected] Cristyn Magnus University at Albany, State University of New York,
[email protected] Christy Mag Uidhir University of Houston Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.library.albany.edu/cas_philosophy_scholar Part of the Philosophy Commons Recommended Citation MAGNUS, C., MAGNUS, P.D. and MAG UIDHIR, C. (2013), Judging Covers. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 71: 361–370. doi: 10.1111/jaac.12034 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Philosophy at Scholars Archive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Philosophy Faculty Scholarship by an authorized administrator of Scholars Archive. For more information, please contact
[email protected]. Judging Covers Cristyn Magnus, P.D. Magnus, and Christy Mag Uidhir1 February 10, 2013 — forthcoming in The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism Abstract: Cover versions form a loose but identifiable category of tracks and performances. We distinguish four kinds of covers and argue that they mark important differences in the modes of evaluation which are possible or appropriate for each: mimic covers, which aim merely to echo the canonical track; rendition covers, which change the sound of the canonical track; transformative covers, which diverge so much as to instantiate a distinct, albeit derivative song; and referential covers, which not only instantiate a distinct song, but for which the new song is in part about the original song. In order to allow for the very possibility of transformative and referential covers, we argue that a cover is characterized by relation to a canonical track rather than merely by being a new instance of a song that had been recorded previously.