Planning-Area-Wide Elements

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Planning-Area-Wide Elements King County Hazard Mitigation Plan Update Volume 1: Planning-Area-Wide Elements REVIEW DRAFT April 2014 King County HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN UPDATE VOLUME 1: PLANNING-AREA-WIDE ELEMENTS REVIEW DRAFT APRIL 2014 Prepared for: King County Office of Emergency Management 3511 NE 2nd Street Renton, WA 98056 Prepared by: Project #103S2548 King County Hazard Mitigation Plan Update; Volume 1—Planning-Area-Wide Elements TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary .............................................................................................................. ES-1 PART 1— THE PLANNING PROCESS Chapter 1. Introduction to the Planning Process.................................................................. 1-1 1.1 Why Prepare This Plan? ....................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1.1 The Big Picture ................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1.2 Local Concerns ................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1.3 Purposes for Planning ......................................................................................................... 1-2 1.2 Who Will Benefit From This Plan? ..................................................................................................... 1-2 1.3 How to Use This Plan .......................................................................................................................... 1-2 Chapter 2. Plan Update—What Has Changed ....................................................................... 2-1 2.1 The Previous Plans ............................................................................................................................... 2-1 2.2 Why Update? ....................................................................................................................................... 2-1 2.3 The Updated Plan—What Is Different? ............................................................................................... 2-2 2.4 Changes in Development ..................................................................................................................... 2-7 2.5 The 5-Year Progress Report ................................................................................................................. 2-8 Chapter 3. Plan Methodology ................................................................................................. 3-1 3.1 Grant Funding ...................................................................................................................................... 3-1 3.2 Formation of the Planning Team ......................................................................................................... 3-1 3.3 Establishment of the Planning Partnership .......................................................................................... 3-1 3.4 Defining the Planning Area.................................................................................................................. 3-3 3.5 The Steering Committee ...................................................................................................................... 3-3 3.6 Coordination with Other Agencies ...................................................................................................... 3-4 3.7 Review of Existing Programs .............................................................................................................. 3-5 3.8 Public Involvement .............................................................................................................................. 3-5 3.8.1 Strategy ............................................................................................................................... 3-6 3.8.2 Public Involvement Results ............................................................................................... 3-11 3.9 Plan Development Chronology/Milestones ....................................................................................... 3-11 Chapter 4. Guiding Principle, Goals and Objectives ............................................................ 4-1 4.1 Guiding Principle ................................................................................................................................. 4-1 4.2 Goals .................................................................................................................................................... 4-1 4.3 Objectives ............................................................................................................................................ 4-1 PART 2— RISK ASSESSMENT Chapter 5. Identified Hazards of Concern and Risk Assessment Methodology ................ 5-1 5.1 Identified Hazards of Concern ............................................................................................................. 5-1 5.2 Methodology ........................................................................................................................................ 5-2 5.3 Risk Assessment Tools ........................................................................................................................ 5-2 5.3.1 Mapping .............................................................................................................................. 5-2 5.3.2 Dam Failure, Earthquake and Flood—HAZUS-MH .......................................................... 5-2 i King County Hazard Mitigation Plan Update; Volume 1—Planning-Area-Wide Elements 5.3.3 Landslide, Tsunami, Severe Weather, Severe Winter Weather, Wildfire and Volcano...... 5-4 5.3.4 Avalanche ............................................................................................................................ 5-4 5.3.5 Limitations .......................................................................................................................... 5-4 Chapter 6. King County Profile ............................................................................................... 6-1 6.1 Jurisdictions and Attractions ................................................................................................................ 6-2 6.2 Historical Overview ............................................................................................................................. 6-2 6.3 Major Past Hazard Events .................................................................................................................... 6-3 6.4 Physical Setting .................................................................................................................................... 6-3 6.4.1 Geology ............................................................................................................................... 6-3 6.4.2 Soils ..................................................................................................................................... 6-5 6.4.3 Seismic Features ................................................................................................................. 6-6 6.4.4 Climate ................................................................................................................................ 6-6 6.5 Land Use ............................................................................................................................................ 6-11 6.6 Critical Facilities and Infrastructure .................................................................................................. 6-11 6.7 Demographics .................................................................................................................................... 6-17 6.7.1 Population Characteristics ................................................................................................. 6-17 6.7.2 Income ............................................................................................................................... 6-17 6.7.3 Age Distribution ................................................................................................................ 6-19 6.7.4 Race, Ethnicity and Language ........................................................................................... 6-20 6.7.5 Disabled Populations ......................................................................................................... 6-21 6.8 Economy ............................................................................................................................................ 6-21 6.8.1 Industry, Businesses and Institutions ................................................................................ 6-21 6.8.2 Employment Trends and Occupations .............................................................................. 6-22 6.9 Future Trends in Development .......................................................................................................... 6-23 6.10 Laws, Ordinances and programs ...................................................................................................... 6-23 6.10.1 Federal ............................................................................................................................... 6-23 6.10.2 State ................................................................................................................................... 6-25 6.10.3 Local Programs ................................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Applicability of a Nationwide Flood Forecasting System for Typhoon
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Applicability of a nationwide food forecasting system for Typhoon Hagibis 2019 Wenchao Ma1*, Yuta Ishitsuka2, Akira Takeshima1, Kenshi Hibino1, Dai Yamazaki1, Kosuke Yamamoto3, Misako Kachi3, Riko Oki3, Taikan Oki4,5 & Kei Yoshimura1* Floods can be devastating in densely populated regions along rivers, so attaining a longer forecast lead time with high accuracy is essential for protecting people and property. Although many techniques are used to forecast foods, sufcient validation of the use of a forecast system for operational alert purposes is lacking. In this study, we validated the fooding locations and times of dike breaking that had occurred during Typhoon Hagibis, which caused severe fooding in Japan in 2019. To achieve the goal of the study, we combined a hydrodynamic model with statistical analysis under forcing by a 39-h prediction of the Japan Meteorological Agency’s Meso-scale model Grid Point Value (MSM-GPV) and obtained dike-break times for all fooded locations for validation. The results showed that this method was accurate in predicting foods at 130 locations, approximately 91.6% of the total of 142 fooded locations, with a lead time of approximately 32.75 h. In terms of precision, these successfully predicted locations accounted for 24.0% of the total of 542 locations under a food warning, and on average, the predicted food time was approximately 8.53 h earlier than a given dike-break time. More warnings were issued for major rivers with severe fooding, indicating that the system is sensitive to extreme food events and can issue warnings for rivers subject to high risk of fooding.
    [Show full text]
  • National Weather Service Hazard Simplification
    National Weather Service Hazard Simplification: Public Survey Final Report Prepared for National Weather Service Silver Spring, MD Prepared by : Eastern Research Group, Lexington, MA June 1, 2018 Executive Summary ............................................................................................................... ES-1 Overview........................................................................................................................................ ES-1 Current Knowledge ........................................................................................................................ ES-3 Prototype Testing .......................................................................................................................... ES-4 Recommendations ......................................................................................................................... ES-8 1.0 Introduction and Overview ..............................................................................................1 2.0 Message Testing Approach ..............................................................................................4 2.1 Prototypes ............................................................................................................................... 4 2.2 Scenarios and Prompts ............................................................................................................ 5 2.3 Protective Response Questions ..............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Flash Flood Alert Toolbox Talk
    Flash Flood Alert Toolbox Talk Flash Flood Warning means flash flooding is occurring or is imminent in the specified area. Move to safe ground immediately. Flash floods can strike any time and any place with little or no warning. In both mountainous and flat terrain, distant rain can be channeled into gullies and ravines, turning a quiet streamside campsite or creek into a rampaging torrent in minutes. City streets can become rivers in seconds. Observe these flash flood safety rules; they could save your life: • Keep alert for signs of heavy rain (thunder and lightning), both where you are and upstream. Watch for rising water levels. • Know where high ground is and get there quickly if you see or hear rapidly rising water. • Be especially cautious at night as it's harder to recognize the danger then. • Do not attempt to walk across or drive through flooded areas or roadways. You will not know the depth of the water. • Don't try to drive through flooded areas. • If your vehicle stalls, abandon it and seek higher ground immediately. During threatening weather listen to commercial radio or NOAA Weather Radio, or watch television for Flash Flood Watch means it is possible that rains will Watch and Warning Bulletins. cause flash flooding in the specified area. Be alert and prepared for a flood emergency. Source: Texas Department of Insurance, Division of Workers’ Compensation Disclaimer: The content in this presentation represents only the views of the presenter. Examples and content within are purely hypothetical and are used for illustrative purposes only and are not intended to reflect Service Lloyds policy or intellectual property.
    [Show full text]
  • Fiji Meteorological Service Government of Republic of Fiji
    FIJI METEOROLOGICAL SERVICE GOVERNMENT OF REPUBLIC OF FIJI MEDIA RELEASE No. 13 1pm, Wednesday, 16 December, 2020 SEVERE TC YASA INTENSIFIES FURTHER INTO A CATEGORY 5 SYSTEM AND SLOW MOVING TOWARDS FIJI Warnings A Tropical Cyclone Warning is now in force for Yasawa and Mamanuca Group, Viti Levu, Vanua Levu and nearby smaller islands and expected to be in force for the rest of the group later today. A Tropical Cyclone Alert remains in force for the rest Fiji A Strong Wind Warning remains in force for the rest of Fiji. A Storm Surge and Damaging Heavy Swell Warning is now in force for coastal waters of Rotuma, Yasawa and Mamanuca Group, Viti Levu, Vanua Levu and nearby smaller islands. A Heavy Rain Warning remains in force for the whole of Fiji. A Flash Flood Alert is now in force for all low lying areas and areas adjacent to small streams along Komave to Navua Town, Navua Town to Rewa, Rewa to Korovou and Korovou to Rakiraki in Vanua Levu and is also in force for all low lying areas and areas adjacent to small streams of Vanua Levu along Bua to Dreketi, Dreketi to Labasa and along Labasa to Udu Point. Situation Severe tropical cyclone Yasa has rapidly intensified and upgraded further into a category 5 system at 3am today. Severe TC Yasa was located near 14.6 south latitude and 174.1 east longitude or about 440km west-northwest of Yasawa-i-Rara, about 500km northwest of Nadi and about 395km southwest of Rotuma at midday today. The system is currently moving eastwards at about 6 knots or 11 kilometers per hour.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of Current Water Quantity Conditions in the Green River Basin
    ASSESSMENT OF CURRENT WATER QUANTITY CONDITIONS IN THE GREEN RIVER BASIN Prepared for: WRIA 9 Steering Committee Funded by: A King Conservation District Grant For the WRIA 9 Forum of Local Governments King County Department of Natural Resources and Parks Washington Department of Ecology Prepared by: Northwest Hydraulics Consultants, Inc. September 2005 ASSESSMENT OF CURRENT WATER QUANTITY CONDITIONS IN THE GREEN RIVER BASIN Prepared for: WRIA 9 Steering Committee Prepared by: Northwest Hydraulic Consultants, Inc. 16300 Christensen Road, Suite 350 Seattle, Washington 98188 Ph. (206) 241-6000 September 2005 Executive Summary Current water quantity conditions are assessed in the Green River Basin upstream from River Mile 23.8 (RM 23.8) where Mill Creek (Auburn), the last of the basin’s major freely-draining tributaries, enters the Green. In the context of the large Green/Duwamish sub-basins described in other reports, this study focuses on the upper Lower Green, the Middle Green, and the Upper Green River sub-watersheds. Water quantity conditions are evaluated in terms of the monthly mean and 7-day low streamflows at selected locations along the main stem channel and on major tributaries. Current conditions are further defined by the status of land use, water withdrawals, and water exports in the watersheds upstream of each location as of approximately Year 2000. This report identifies and draws upon the many prior studies which have characterized water resources and uses in the study area. An accompanying CD-ROM disk provides copies of recent digitally- published documents including the December 2000 Habitat Limiting Factors and Reconnaissance Assessment Report for the Green/Duwamish Watershed, the July 2001 Tacoma Water Habitat Conservation Plan for the Green River, and the July 2001 Central Puget Sound Regional Water Supply Outlook.
    [Show full text]
  • Fountain Hills Warning Area
    FFOOUUNNTTAAIINN HHIILLLLSS FFLLOOOODD RREESSPPOONNSSEE PPLLAANN Photo source: www.myfountainhills.com TTEECCHHNNIICCAALL MMEEMMOORRAANNDDUUMM Prepared For: Flood Control District of Maricopa County 2801 West Durango Street Phoenix, AZ 85009 (602) 506-1501 JE Fuller/ Hydrology & Geomorphology, Inc. 6101 S. Rural Road, Suite 110 Tempe, AZ 85283 (480) 752-2124 April 2002 NOTE: THE USER SHOULD READ THE ENTIRE FLOOD RESPONSE PLAN CAREFULLY AND SHOULD BE AWARE OF ALL ELEMENTS OF THIS PLAN, INCLUDING STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS, AND INDIVIDUAL RESPONSIBILITIES. THE FLOOD WARNING/ RESPONSE PLAN PRESENTED HEREIN, AND IN THE DISPATCHER ATLAS AND THE EMERGENCY ACCESS MAP, IS USEFUL AS ONE STEP IN DEVELOPING A FLOOD WARNING SYSTEM FOR THE RESIDENTS WITHIN THE FOUNTAIN HILLS WARNING AREA. HOWEVER, THE POSSIBILITY OF INADVERTENT ERROR IN DESIGN OR FAILURE OF EQUIPMENT FUNCTION EXISTS AND MAY PREVENT THE SYSTEM FROM OPERATING PERFECTLY AT ALL TIMES. THEREFORE, NOTHING CONTAINED HEREIN MAY BE CONSTRUED AS A GUARANTEE OF THE SYSTEM OR ITS OPERATION, OR CREATE ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ANY PARTY OR ITS DIRECTORS, OFFICERS, EMPLOYEES OR AGENTS FOR ANY DAMAGE THAT MAY BE ALLEGED TO RESULT FROM THE OPERATION, OR FAILURE TO OPERATE, OF THE SYSTEM OR ANY OF ITS COMPONENT PARTS. THIS CONSTITUTES NOTICE TO ANY AND ALL PERSONS OR PARTIES THAT THE NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE, FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT OF MARICOPA COUNTY, MARICOPA COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT, MARICOPA COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE, FOUNTAIN HILLS MARSHALS DEPARTMENT, RURAL METRO FIRE DEPARTMENT, FOUNTAIN HILLS PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT, AND JE FULLER/ HYDROLOGY & GEOMORPHOLOGY, INC. OR ANY OFFICER, AGENT OR EMPLOYEE THEREOF, SHALL NOT BE LIABLE FOR ANY DEATHS, INJURIES, OR DAMAGES OF WHAT EVER KIND THAT MAY RESULT FROM RELIANCE ON THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THIS SYSTEM.
    [Show full text]
  • Corporate Resilience
    NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED Corporate Resilience Croydon Council Severe Weather Response Guidance V4.0 October 2020 This document is designed to be printed in A5 “Booklet” form Croydon Resilience Team Place Department Room 2.12, Town Hall, Katharine Street, Croydon, CR0 1NX [email protected] 1 NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED Contents SECTION A: INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................................... 3 DOCUMENT INFORMATION ........................................................................................................................................ 4 CRITICAL INFORMATION ............................................................................................................................................ 5 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................................ 5 AIM ......................................................................................................................................................................... 5 OBJECTIVES ............................................................................................................................................................ 5 SCOPE .................................................................................................................................................................... 5 RISK AND CONTEXT ................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Automatic Flood Alert System Protects the People of Son La Automatic
    42826Ymi_158VAISALANEWS 14.12.2001 17:54 Sivu 18 Le Cong Thanh Director National Center for Hydrometeorological Forecasting (HMF) Hydrology Meteorology n 1991, the flash Service of Vietnam (HMS) flood occurred very I suddenly, and the people of Son La still remember the horrible Vaisala Automatic Weather Systems in Vietnam events. Formidable flows of muddy water destroyed every- thing in their path. During our first survey trip to Son La, one AutomaticAutomatic FloodFlood AlertAlert local resident told us: “It was terrible. We just watched the water rising higher and higher; SystemSystem ProtectsProtects thethe our house, our gardens disap- peared. Nothing was left but mud, everywhere. I didn’t even know where my relatives were.” PeoplePeople ofof SonSon LaLa The damage would not have been so severe, and thousands of lives could have been saved, if the flood had been predicted and announced to the residents of Son La. Realizing the need for timely flood prediction, the Hydrology & Meteorology Service of Vietnam (HMS) had feasibility studies conducted by its experts, and took a decision to design and deploy the first automatic flood reporting sys- tem in the province of Son La. Reliability a key criterion The first requirements of the system were simplicity and reli- ability, as HMS experts set out to define and create a basic sys- tem design. The project was di- vided into two phases for smooth implementation, as in- stallation of hardware is possi- ble in this area only during the dry seasons. In its system spec- ification, HMS suggested that automatic data acquisition sta- The province of Son La, which is located in a mountainous area of Northwest Vietnam, suf- fered a sudden flash flood in 1991.
    [Show full text]
  • Capron Seattle's Turbine Pumps
    Seattle’s Turbine Pumps – No Electricity Needed Cheryl Capron - Seattle Public Utilities PNWS-AWWA Conference May 6, 2016 Overview Seattle System Topography Concept Operational Needs The Turbines Seattle System Topography “Seattle has hills, and to spare. With surface elevation of Lake Youngs at 498 feet above sea level, water incoming from Cedar River is vented by gravity into reservoirs at surface elevation 430 feet, as is the reservoir on Capitol Hill. Leo Tank on Beacon Hill is supplied by gravity, off the pipelines, at elevation 480 feet. So are reservoirs on the West Seattle hills, at elevation 440 feet. Topography (cont.) “Hydraulic turbines placed on the lines, take advantage of the kinetic energy of water between elevations. Pumps connected to these units force water to high zone towers and tanks with overflows of 530 feet above sea level, such as Queen Anne Hill.” R.H. Calligan, Superintendent of Water, 1893 Topography & Pressure Zones Pressure Zone Hydraulic Profile Tolt Cedar Service Area (720) 590 550 585 530 530 509 Lake Youngs 430 (502) 430 - 440 326 Tolt Service Area The Concept and The Operational Needs Turbine Schematic 25% - 33% of flow into station is pumped to high service. High Service Pump Storage Direct Coupling Drive Remote Control Ball Valve Low Service Storage 66% - 75% of Supply Line From Intermediate Service flow into station is Reservoir discharged to low service. Operational Needs Hills & multiple pressure zones Stable & adequate suction head Output varies along with gradient on pipeline supply
    [Show full text]
  • Flood Warnings: What Steps to Take
    FLOOD WARNINGS: WHAT STEPS TO TAKE A free service from the Environment Agency enables you to receive flood alerts and warnings by text, call and/or email. It is important that your information is kept up to date and you should consider registering two or more contact numbers, not just a landline. You can also register a local friend, relative or staff member in case you are away from the property at the time a warning is received. This service provides warnings for the risk of flooding from main rivers and the sea, and not from surface water flooding. To sign up visit www.gov.uk/sign-up-for-flood-warnings or call on 0345 988 1188 FLOOD ALERT FLOOD WARNING SEVERE FLOOD WARNING This means that flooding is This means that flooding to Flooding is likely to cause possible and you need to stay property is expected and significant risk to life and alert and vigilant, making early immediate action is required to destruction of property. preparations for a potential protect yourself and your flood. property. Prepare to evacuate and cooperate with the emergency • Monitor the situation through • Continue to monitor the services. forecasts, local radio stations situation. and monitoring stations. • Get your flood kit before • Carry out actions detailed evacuating. • Check your flood plan is filled in your flood plan. in and your flood kit is complete • Turn off utility supplies. and ready if needed. • Put any flood resilience equipment into place. This shows data from your local Environment Agency monitoring station GAUGEMAP which is updated every 15 minutes.
    [Show full text]
  • An Appropriate Flood Warning System in the Context of Developing Countries
    International Journal of Innovation, Management and Technology, Vol. 3, No. 3, June 2012 An Appropriate Flood Warning System in the Context of Developing Countries Saysoth Keoduangsine and Robert Goodwin mud from landslides and other natural overgrowth. Human Abstract—Flooding due to natural disasters such as heavy activities such as excessive clearance of vegetation upstream rains and tropical cyclones, results in huge losses of life and can also cause river floods. property. In many countries flood warning systems (FWS) 2) Flash flood have been introduced to minimize this loss by warning people Flash floods are brought about by the convective in flood prone areas to evacuate and protect their property, albeit some damage still occurs. This paper explores flood precipitation of large volumes of water from intense warning systems and associated issues in developing countries thunderstorms or water suddenly released from an upstream which potentially can reduce the loss of lives and property storage and the drainage system is insufficient to cope with during a flooding occurrence. The paper then proposes an the flow. Flash floods may occur after the collapse of a appropriate FWS in the context of developing countries. human structure such as a dam or reservoir. 3) Coastal flood Index Terms—Flood warning system (FWS), developing Storms or other extreme weather conditions such as low countries, SMS atmospheric pressure combined with high tides can cause sea levels to rise above normal, forcing sea water inland and causing a coastal flood. These floods also result from I. INTRODUCTION tsunamis which are caused by earthquakes, hurricanes or Natural disasters such as floods are a worldwide tropical cyclones.
    [Show full text]
  • Manual on Flood Forecasting and Warning
    Quality ManageMeNt Framework g N i MaNual on For more information, please contact: warn World Meteorological Organization Flood Forecasting and Communications and Public Affairs Office g N Tel.: +41 (0) 22 730 83 14/15 – Fax: +41 (0) 22 730 80 27 and Warning sti E-mail: [email protected] ca e or Hydrology and Water Resources Branch f Climate and Water Department lood Tel.: +41 (0) 22 730 84 79 – Fax: +41 (0) 22 730 80 43 E-mail: [email protected] 7 bis, avenue de la Paix – P.O. Box 2300 – CH-1211 Geneva 2 – Switzerland W_102107 l MANUAL ON f www.wmo.int P-C WMO-No. 1072 Manual on Flood Forecasting and Warning WMO-No. 1072 2011 edition WMO-No. 1072 © World Meteorological Organization, 2011 The right of publication in print, electronic and any other form and in any language is reserved by WMO. Short extracts from WMO publications may be reproduced without authorization, provided that the complete source is clearly indicated. Editorial correspondence and requests to publish, reproduce or translate this publication in part or in whole should be addressed to: Chairperson, Publications Board World Meteorological Organization (WMO) 7 bis, avenue de la Paix Tel.: +41 (0) 22 730 84 03 P.O. Box No. 2300 Fax: +41 (0) 22 730 80 40 CH-1211 Geneva 2, Switzerland E-mail: [email protected] ISBN 978-92-63-11072-5 NOTE The designations employed in WMO publications and the presentation of material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of WMO concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries.
    [Show full text]