Volume 8, No. 4, November 1985
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Bryant University Bryant Digital Repository Douglas and Judith Krupp Library Special Bryant Review (1978-1997) Collections Fall 1985 volume 8, no. 4, November 1985 Bryant University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.bryant.edu/bryant_review Recommended Citation Bryant University, "volume 8, no. 4, November 1985" (1985). Bryant Review (1978-1997). Paper 25. https://digitalcommons.bryant.edu/bryant_review/25 This Newsletter is brought to you for free and open access by the Douglas and Judith Krupp Library Special Collections at Bryant Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Bryant Review (1978-1997) by an authorized administrator of Bryant Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. BRYANT NOVEMBER, 1985 REVIEW November, 1985 Volume 8, Number 4 Editor e sports scandals 3 HOLDING C. Ralph Adler 10 about 30 Hi' s.ud th(' 44·ml'mtwr ('~'mml<;.c:aon ., look THE LINE 15 per c('nt 109 into tlw a('tlvlllt'~ of ('C)lh'~c ~nd lIn1vprslty Associate Editors Ilhf:'r Hi per pfCSldE"nts 1n.')O{i:lf as athJctw~ is ('flfl("('mt'tj and Itb the com· he decl,lred " 1 belwv1' 3!'; a J!;rnup w( hav(' I The Presidential Perspective Elizabeth J. O'Neil pro -lUuh'd QUrM'ives. We have f;,1I1N1 In our ath him as an oblJl':atlQn.s as 3C'ati< mlC' Il'arl£'t1\ and iJS Pffiple sta William Rupp ll'taC!; which to ",.hom olt)£'rs 10\)1\. to the mo::: !tfn~ll1vt· In pa' on ethics in athletics h,.'\d only 17 pr('>S('rvlng the l<ledls Jnd pnn('lplf'S of our a , '~ ~rndllah .soc ...'t\, thl! Alumni Association of Its black In (t'll!' are.. he adtted. "we ha\i(' Mt done a Y'" V(>f\' good Job \ Executive Board Ihp rountrv. Ttw NCAA wa-c; fOl1nrlN1 79 ,"'PaT'S ago and On<': m. IIt(': alhi<'trs of II !' h~l rnovE'S WJ5 to· btio thl- ,< f1ymg .I)Q Jell. athll'l~ Wcd~E" In (()olhall , whl('h Pn ldl~t Teddy p<'I1 RooH'v('lt 3skf'd ~ f"nr('lf'tt ht'i-au (' of II~ President tbaH coach brutahh", Complmnts f'30lf' In of ~Iu ... h IlInd~ .""tw, )(' COIM no supporhl'lR rollegf' athkfu'$ E>v,'n In th ..- earl)' yea Robert Danielson '67 MBA '80 ? cheating years of thp orgamulhon .. tnd the- Camf'gle coo as,kelpst!_ .. ~oundatlon dl~ a report. abl)u~ 5(>n~us. k~.?~~! yea First Vice-President Joseph Ravalese, Jr. '54 Second Vice-President 10 SERVING Paula Iacono '69 Secretary JUSTICE Stephen Celona III '79 Associate Professor Treasurer Jim Estey as Ernest Almonte '78 Grand Jury foreman Immediate Past President David Wall MBA '74 Members-at-Large N. Richmond Alexander, Jr. '64, MBA '77 Scott Clark '74 Alfred Corso '66 Thomas Davis '69 12 THE NON-PROFIT Doreen DeSanto '86 Nelson Gulski '26 MOTWE Patrick Keeley Alan lang '52 Bryant alumni in the Elizabeth Nawrocki '67 non-profit sector Audrey Pate MBA '82 Kelly Parkins '86 Arthur Rozzero '72 Michael Storti '64 Alumni Trustee Michael T. Martin '72 Alumni Relations Office (401) 232-6040 4 BRYANT BRIEFS 14 ALUMNI ASSOCIATION NEWS Director of Alumni Relations Karen Randazzo 18 CLASS NOTES 21 GRADUATE CLASS NOTES AssIstant Director Mary A. Du pre 22 DID YOU KNOW? Secretary 24 CALENDAR Barbara lasorsa Coordinator of BRYANT REVIEW ( USPS 462-970) is published four Alumni Information Systems times a year in January, April, August, and Carla Dubey November for the Bryant Coll ege communiry. Publication offices are located in the Publicatio ns and Advenising Office, Bryant College, Smithfield, Rhode Island, 0291 7. Second class postage is paid at Providence, Rhode Island. Postmaster: Send address changes to Bryant Review, Bryant College, Smithfield, Rhode Island 02917. 2 PRESIDENTIAL PERSPECTWE HOLDING THE LINE Ethics in athletics By William T O'Hara Report was released. The moral issues in Of the 797 member institutions, 435 President volved in recruitment practices and athletic were represented at the convention. All 284 subsidies continued to dominate the college Division I members were there, as well as New Orleans is probably best known for athletic directors' decision-making powers. almost 200 presidents and chancellors, setting its colorful Mardi Gras festivals, smoky jazz But in the 1980s, five decades after the a new record in NCAA history. There was no clubs, and hot Cajun food. I remember it most Carnegie Report first identified college presi question in my mind or in the minds of my as the exciting setting of a recent historical dents as the people who were the most likely colleagues that the college preSidents domi event where college presidents from all over to succeed in abolishing unethical practices nated the meeting. It was very clear by the the country gathered to make a statement in college athletiCS, change is coming. College end of the convention that we were definitely heard in every athletic department of almost preSidents are finally ready to accept respon back in the driver's seat, when every one of every American college. My role in this historic sibility for their own athletic departments, our 12 proposals was approved by unanimous moment has been Significant in bringing after an increasing number of NCAA violations or near-unanimous vote. Bryant College a great deal of respect in the by member institutions. The most noteworthy of the twelve world of intercollegiate athletics. I would like Thirteen institutions are now on proba proposals: to share with you my unique experience in tion in the NCAA for rule violations, ranging · establishes distinctions between "major" helping my fellow college presidents shape from grade tanlpering, illegal slush funds, and "secondary" violations of the NCAA rules the future of college athletic programs. point shaving, and unethical recruitment and establishes specific penalties for these History was first made back in january practices. You may recognize some of their violations; of 1984, when the National Collegiate Athletic names: the Un iversity of Illinois, the University · requires that those restrictions imposed on Association voted to establish a Presidents' of Florida, and Tulane. Those are just a few a coach for a major or secondary violation Commission consisting of 44 presidents and that have made recent headlines in the news should be applied even if he or she is em chancellors of NCAA member institutions. I paper. Yet, according to Walter Byers, execu ployed at an institution other than the one at arn one of five presidents from New England tive director of the NCAA, 30 percent of all which the violations occurred; on the commission, putting Bryant College Division I institutions are involved in some • requires that each school's athletic pro shoulder to shoulder with such prestigious kind of dishonesty. gram must undergo an annual audit by an institutions as Brigham Young University, the I and my fellow colleagues on the individual outside the institution; University of Kentucky, and University of Presidents' Commission represent all classifi · requires all Division I colleges to submit an California, Berkeley. This is the first organized cations of the NCAA and all major conferences. annual report to the NCAA showing that involvement of chief executives into the We have the power to review any CAA entering freshman athletes comply with administration of intercollegiate athletics in activity, commission studies of athletic issues, academic standards for entrance and showing the 79-year history of the NCAA. sponsor legislation directly to any convention, the rate of graduation of senior athletes; The reasons for establishing the and call for a special convention of the asso · requires that member institutions' athletic Presidents' Commission were clear to us all ciation. One of the first things we did was to budgets be controlled by the school and be intercollegiate athletics had been conSistently conduct an extensive research study on the approved by either the president or a designee earning a bad reputation from decades of un increasing concern among our colleagues of the president who is not in the athletic ethical recruitment practices, alumni slush over the "integrity crisis" in intercollegiate department. This last proposal firmly places funds, drug use among athletes, illegal gam athletics. Through an independent research the control of coll ege athletic departments bling, and poor graduation records for college firm , we surveyed the chief executives at all back into the college president's hands. athletes. Clandestine practices in college NCAA member institutions. The survey These five legislative proposals and the athletic departments were endangering the covered issues regarding academic integrity others that passed at the special convention integrity of universities as a whole. It was time and economics of higher education. Presi are only the beginning of our determination we as college presidents took the responsi dents and chancellors surveyed were con to clean up intercollegiate athletics. We are bility of cleaning up our athletic depart cerned that there is insufficient control over already planning the agenda for future ments-in fact, it was a long time overdue. athletic programs. 11ley were convinced that meetings and met again in October to look As far back as 1929, the public has known scandals over re(ruiting and academic abuses more closely at the whole academic arena. about the presence of unethical practices in were an embarrassment that higher education One of the issues we discussed at our college athletics. That year the Carnegie could no longer afford. October session is the controversial Rule 48, Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching From the results of that survey, the com which was adopted at the NCAA national con released its historic study on college ath letics. mission then sponsored twelve legislative vention in january, 1983.