DOCSLIB.ORG

Votes Cast in Oregon for United States President 1860–2020

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Votes Cast in Oregon for United States President 1860–2020 Votes Cast in Oregon for United States President 1860–2020 Key: *Elected; **Received highest vote in Oregon but lost election nationwide Year Candidate Party Votes 1860 John Bell Constitutional Union 212 John C. Breckenridge Democrat 5,074 Stephen Douglas Douglas Democrat 4,131 Abraham Lincoln* Republican 5,344 1864 Abraham Lincoln* Republican 9,888 George McClellan Democrat 8,457 1868 U.S. Grant* Republican 10,961 Horatio Seymour** Democrat 11,125 1872 U.S. Grant* Republican 11,818 Horace Greeley Democrat-Liberal Republicans 7,742 Charles O’Connor National Labor Reformers 587 1876 Peter Cooper Greenback 510 Rutherford B. Hayes* Republican 15,214 Samuel Tilden Democrat 14,157 1880 James A. Garfield* Republican 20,619 Winfield Hancock Democrat 19,955 James B. Weaver Greenback Labor 249 1884 James G. Blaine** Republican 26,860 General B.F. Butler Greenback Labor (Workingman) 726 Grover Cleveland* Democrat 24,604 John P. St. John Prohibition 492 1888 Grover Cleveland Democrat 26,522 Robert H. Cowdrey United Labor 363 Clinton B. Fisk Prohibition 1,677 Benjamin Harrison* Republican 33,291 1892 John Bidwell Prohibition 2,281 Grover Cleveland* Democrat 14,243 Benjamin Harrison** Republican 35,002 James B. Weaver1 Populist 26,965 1896 William J. Bryan Democrat, People’s Party and 46,739 Silver Republican Joshua Levering Prohibition 919 William McKinley* Republican 48,779 John M. Palmer National (Gold) Democrat 977 1900 Wharton Barker Regular People’s 275 William J. Bryan Democrat People’s 33,385 Eugene V. Debs Social-Democrats 1,494 William McKinley* Republican 46,526 John G. Woolley Prohibition 2,536 1904 Eugene V. Debs Socialist 7,619 1 Alton Parker Democrat 17,327 Theodore Roosevelt* Republican 60,455 Silas C. Swallow Prohibition 3,806 Thomas E. Watson People’s 753 1908 William J. Bryan Democrat 38,049 Eugene W. Chafin Prohibition 2,682 Eugene V. Debs Socialist 7,339 Thomas L. Hisgen Independence 289 William H. Taft* Republican 62,530 1912 Eugene W. Chafin Prohibition 4,360 Eugene V. Debs Socialist 13,343 Theodore Roosevelt Progressive 37,600 William H. Taft Republican 34,673 Woodrow Wilson* Democrat 47,064 1916 Allan L. Benson Socialist 9,711 J. Frank Hanley Prohibition 4,729 Charles Evans Hughes** Republican 126,813 John M. Parker2 Progressive 310 Woodrow Wilson* Democrat 120,087 1920 James M. Cox Democrat 80,019 William W. Cox Industrial Labor 1,515 Eugene V. Debs Socialist 9,801 Warren G. Harding* Republican 143,592 Aaron S. Watkins Prohibition 3,595 1924 Calvin Coolidge* Republican 142,579 John W. Davis Democrat 67,589 Frank T. Johns Socialist Labor 917 Robert M. LaFollette Independent 68,403 1928 William Z. Foster Independent 1,094 Herbert Hoover* Republican 205,341 Verne L. Reynolds Socialist Labor 1,564 Alfred E. Smith Democrat 109,223 Norman Thomas Socialist Principles-Independent 2,720 1932 William Z. Foster Communist 1,681 Herbert Hoover Republican 136,019 Verne L. Reynolds Socialist Labor 1,730 Franklin D. Roosevelt* Democrat 213,871 Norman Thomas Socialist 15,450 1936 John W. Aiken Socialist Labor 500 Alfred M. Landon Republican 122,706 William Lemke Independent 21,831 Franklin D. Roosevelt* Democrat 266,733 Norman Thomas Independent 2,143 1940 John W. Aiken Socialist Labor 2,487 Franklin D. Roosevelt* Democrat 258,415 Wendell L. Willkie Republican 219,555 1944 Thomas E. Dewey Republican 225,365 Franklin D. Roosevelt* Democrat 248,635 Norman Thomas Independent 3,785 Claude A. Watson Independent 2,362 1948 Thomas E. Dewey** Republican 260,904 2 Norman Thomas Independent 5,051 Harry S. Truman* Democrat 243,147 Henry A. Wallace Progressive 14,978 1952 Dwight D. Eisenhower* Republican 420,815 Vincent Hallinan Independent 3,665 Adlai Stevenson Democrat 270,579 1956 Dwight D. Eisenhower* Republican 406,393 Adlai Stevenson Democrat 329,204 1960 John F. Kennedy* Democrat 367,402 Richard M. Nixon** Republican 408,060 1964 Barry M. Goldwater Republican 282,779 Lyndon B. Johnson* Democrat 501,017 1968 Hubert H. Humphrey Democrat 358,866 Richard M. Nixon* Republican 408,433 George C. Wallace Independent 49,683 1972 George S. McGovern Democrat 392,760 Richard M. Nixon* Republican 486,686 John G. Schmitz Independent 46,211 1976 Jimmy Carter* Democrat 490,407 Gerald Ford** Republican 492,120 Eugene J. McCarthy Independent 40,207 1980 John Anderson Independent 112,389 Jimmy Carter Democrat 456,890 Ed Clark Libertarian 25,838 Barry Commoner Independent 13,642 Ronald Reagan* Republican 571,044 1984 Walter F. Mondale Democrat 536,479 Ronald Reagan* Republican 685,700 1988 George Bush* Republican 560,126 Michael S. Dukakis** Democrat 616,206 Lenora B. Fulani Independent 6,487 Ron Paul Libertarian 14,811 1992 George Bush Republican 475,757 Bill Clinton* Democrat 621,314 Lenora Fulani New Alliance Party 3,030 Andre Marrou Libertarian 4,277 Ross Perot Independent Initiative Party of Oregon 354,091 1996 Harry Browne Libertarian 8,903 Bill Clinton* Democrat 649,641 Bob Dole Republican 538,152 John Hagelin Natural Law 2,798 Mary Cal Hollis Socialist 1,922 Ralph Nader Pacific 49,415 Ross Perot Reform 121,221 Howard Phillips U.S. Taxpayers 3,379 2000 Harry Browne Libertarian 7,447 Patrick J. Buchanan Independent 7,063 George W. Bush* Republican 713,577 Al Gore** Democrat 720,342 John Hagelin Reform 2,574 Ralph Nader Pacific Green 77,357 3 Howard Phillips Constitution 2,189 2004 Michael Badnarik Libertarian 7,260 George W. Bush* Republican 866,831 David Cobb Pacific Green 5,315 John F. Kerry** Democrat 943,163 Michael Anthony Peroutka Constitution 5,257 2008 Baldwin, Chuck Constitution 7,693 Barr, Bob Libertarian 7,635 McCain, John Republican 738,475 McKinney, Cynthia Pacific Green 4,543 Nader, Ralph Peace 18,614 Obama, Barack* Democrat 1,037,291 2012 Anderson, Ross C. (Rocky) Progressive 3,384 Christensen, Will Constitution 4,432 Johnson, Gary Libertarian 24,089 Obama, Barack* Democrat 970,488 Romney, Mitt Republican 754,175 Stein, Jill Pacific Green 19,427 2016 Clinton, Hillary** Democrat 1,002,106 Johnson, Gary Libertarian 94,231 Stein, Jill Pacific Green 50,002 Trump, Donald J.* Republican 782,403 2020 Biden, Joseph R.* Democrat 1,340,383 Hawkins, Howie Pacific Green 11,831 Hunter, Dario Progressive 4,988 Jorgensen, Jo Libertarian 41,582 Trump, Donald J Republican 958,448 1One Weaver elector was endorsed by the Democrats and elected as a Fusionist, receiving 35,811 votes. 2Vice-presidential candidate 4.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Election Division Presidential Electors Faqs and Roster of Electors, 1816
    Election Division Presidential Electors FAQ Q1: How many presidential electors does Indiana have? What determines this number? Indiana currently has 11 presidential electors. Article 2, Section 1, Clause 2 of the Constitution of the United States provides that each state shall appoint a number of electors equal to the number of Senators or Representatives to which the state is entitled in Congress. Since Indiana has currently has 9 U.S. Representatives and 2 U.S. Senators, the state is entitled to 11 electors. Q2: What are the requirements to serve as a presidential elector in Indiana? The requirements are set forth in the Constitution of the United States. Article 2, Section 1, Clause 2 provides that "no Senator or Representative, or person holding an Office of Trust or Profit under the United States, shall be appointed an Elector." Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment also states that "No person shall be... elector of President or Vice-President... who, having previously taken an oath... to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. Congress may be a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability." These requirements are included in state law at Indiana Code 3-8-1-6(b). Q3: How does a person become a candidate to be chosen as a presidential elector in Indiana? Three political parties (Democratic, Libertarian, and Republican) have their presidential and vice- presidential candidates placed on Indiana ballots after their party's national convention.
    [Show full text]
  • In Defence of the Court's Integrity
    In Defence of the Court’s Integrity 17 In Defence of the Court’s Integrity: The Role of Chief Justice Charles Evans Hughes in the Defeat of the Court-Packing Plan of 1937 Ryan Coates Honours, Durham University ‘No greater mistake can be made than to think that our institutions are fixed or may not be changed for the worse. We are a young nation and nothing can be taken for granted. If our institutions are maintained in their integrity, and if change shall mean improvement, it will be because the intelligent and the worthy constantly generate the motive power which, distributed over a thousand lines of communication, develops that appreciation of the standards of decency and justice which we have delighted to call the common sense of the American people.’ Hughes in 1909 ‘Our institutions were not designed to bring about uniformity of opinion; if they had been, we might well abandon hope.’ Hughes in 1925 ‘While what I am about to say would ordinarily be held in confidence, I feel that I am justified in revealing it in defence of the Court’s integrity.’ Hughes in the 1940s In early 1927, ten years before his intervention against the court-packing plan, Charles Evans Hughes, former Governor of New York, former Republican presidential candidate, former Secretary of State, and most significantly, former Associate Justice of the Supreme Court, delivered a series 18 history in the making vol. 3 no. 2 of lectures at his alma mater, Columbia University, on the subject of the Supreme Court.1 These lectures were published the following year as The Supreme Court: Its Foundation, Methods and Achievements (New York: Columbia University Press, 1928).
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix File Anes 1988‐1992 Merged Senate File
    Version 03 Codebook ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ CODEBOOK APPENDIX FILE ANES 1988‐1992 MERGED SENATE FILE USER NOTE: Much of his file has been converted to electronic format via OCR scanning. As a result, the user is advised that some errors in character recognition may have resulted within the text. MASTER CODES: The following master codes follow in this order: PARTY‐CANDIDATE MASTER CODE CAMPAIGN ISSUES MASTER CODES CONGRESSIONAL LEADERSHIP CODE ELECTIVE OFFICE CODE RELIGIOUS PREFERENCE MASTER CODE SENATOR NAMES CODES CAMPAIGN MANAGERS AND POLLSTERS CAMPAIGN CONTENT CODES HOUSE CANDIDATES CANDIDATE CODES >> VII. MASTER CODES ‐ Survey Variables >> VII.A. Party/Candidate ('Likes/Dislikes') ? PARTY‐CANDIDATE MASTER CODE PARTY ONLY ‐‐ PEOPLE WITHIN PARTY 0001 Johnson 0002 Kennedy, John; JFK 0003 Kennedy, Robert; RFK 0004 Kennedy, Edward; "Ted" 0005 Kennedy, NA which 0006 Truman 0007 Roosevelt; "FDR" 0008 McGovern 0009 Carter 0010 Mondale 0011 McCarthy, Eugene 0012 Humphrey 0013 Muskie 0014 Dukakis, Michael 0015 Wallace 0016 Jackson, Jesse 0017 Clinton, Bill 0031 Eisenhower; Ike 0032 Nixon 0034 Rockefeller 0035 Reagan 0036 Ford 0037 Bush 0038 Connally 0039 Kissinger 0040 McCarthy, Joseph 0041 Buchanan, Pat 0051 Other national party figures (Senators, Congressman, etc.) 0052 Local party figures (city, state, etc.) 0053 Good/Young/Experienced leaders; like whole ticket 0054 Bad/Old/Inexperienced leaders; dislike whole ticket 0055 Reference to vice‐presidential candidate ? Make 0097 Other people within party reasons Card PARTY ONLY ‐‐ PARTY CHARACTERISTICS 0101 Traditional Democratic voter: always been a Democrat; just a Democrat; never been a Republican; just couldn't vote Republican 0102 Traditional Republican voter: always been a Republican; just a Republican; never been a Democrat; just couldn't vote Democratic 0111 Positive, personal, affective terms applied to party‐‐good/nice people; patriotic; etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Majority and Minority Leaders”, Available At
    Majority and Minority Party Membership Other Resources Adapted from: “Majority and Minority Leaders”, www.senate.gov Available at: http://www.senate.gov/artandhistory/history/common/briefing/Majority_Minority_Leaders.htm Majority and Minority Leaders Chapter 1: Introduction Chapter 2: Majority and Minority Leaders Chapter 3: Majority and Minority Whips (Assistant Floor Leaders) Chapter 4: Complete List of Majority and Minority Leaders Chapter 5: Longest-Serving Party Leaders Introduction The positions of party floor leader are not included in the Constitution but developed gradually in the 20th century. The first floor leaders were formally designated in 1920 (Democrats) and 1925 (Republicans). The Senate Republican and Democratic floor leaders are elected by the members of their party in the Senate at the beginning of each Congress. Depending on which party is in power, one serves as majority leader and the other as minority leader. The leaders serve as spokespersons for their parties' positions on issues. The majority leader schedules the daily legislative program and fashions the unanimous consent agreements that govern the time for debate. The majority leader has the right to be called upon first if several senators are seeking recognition by the presiding officer, which enables him to offer motions or amendments before any other senator. Majority and Minority Leaders Elected at the beginning of each Congress by members of their respective party conferences to represent them on the Senate floor, the majority and minority leaders serve as spokesmen for their parties' positions on the issues. The majority leader has also come to speak for the Senate as an institution. Working with the committee chairs and ranking members, the majority leader schedules business on the floor by calling bills from the calendar and keeps members of his party advised about the daily legislative program.
    [Show full text]
  • Martin Van Buren: the Greatest American President
    SUBSCRIBE NOW AND RECEIVE CRISIS AND LEVIATHAN* FREE! “The Independent Review does not accept “The Independent Review is pronouncements of government officials nor the excellent.” conventional wisdom at face value.” —GARY BECKER, Noble Laureate —JOHN R. MACARTHUR, Publisher, Harper’s in Economic Sciences Subscribe to The Independent Review and receive a free book of your choice* such as the 25th Anniversary Edition of Crisis and Leviathan: Critical Episodes in the Growth of American Government, by Founding Editor Robert Higgs. This quarterly journal, guided by co-editors Christopher J. Coyne, and Michael C. Munger, and Robert M. Whaples offers leading-edge insights on today’s most critical issues in economics, healthcare, education, law, history, political science, philosophy, and sociology. Thought-provoking and educational, The Independent Review is blazing the way toward informed debate! Student? Educator? Journalist? Business or civic leader? Engaged citizen? This journal is for YOU! *Order today for more FREE book options Perfect for students or anyone on the go! The Independent Review is available on mobile devices or tablets: iOS devices, Amazon Kindle Fire, or Android through Magzter. INDEPENDENT INSTITUTE, 100 SWAN WAY, OAKLAND, CA 94621 • 800-927-8733 • [email protected] PROMO CODE IRA1703 Martin Van Buren The Greatest American President —————— ✦ —————— JEFFREY ROGERS HUMMEL resident Martin Van Buren does not usually receive high marks from histori- ans. Born of humble Dutch ancestry in December 1782 in the small, upstate PNew York village of Kinderhook, Van Buren gained admittance to the bar in 1803 without benefit of higher education. Building on a successful country legal practice, he became one of the Empire State’s most influential and prominent politi- cians while the state was surging ahead as the country’s wealthiest and most populous.
    [Show full text]
  • National Prohibition Convention, Music Hall, Cincinnati
    Wright State University CORE Scholar Martha McClellan Brown Correspondence Martha McClellan Brown Papers (MS-147) 6-16-1892 National Prohibition Convention, Music Hall, Cincinnati Oscar B. Todhunter Follow this and additional works at: https://corescholar.libraries.wright.edu/ special_ms147_correspondence Part of the Women's History Commons Repository Citation Todhunter , O. B. (1892). National Prohibition Convention, Music Hall, Cincinnati. This Letter is brought to you for free and open access by the Martha McClellan Brown Papers (MS-147) at CORE Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Martha McClellan Brown Correspondence by an authorized administrator of CORE Scholar. For more information, please contact [email protected]. I I NATIOl'JAL PROHIBllflON -CONVENTION, CO M MITTEE OF ARRANGEMENTS: I PRINTING COMMITTEE: J. B. MARTIN, Chairman, H. T. OGDEN, Chairman, 29 West Fifth Street. MUSIC HALL, CINCINNATI, 65 West Fourth Street. HALL COMMITTEE: MRS. M. McCLELLAN BROWN, Secretary, DR. J. A. THOMPSON, Chairman, Wesleyan College. 154 West Eighth Street. SAMUEL '9ELLS, Treasurer, DECORATION COMMITTEE: 67 Vine Street. JUNE 29-30, 1892. MRS. L. s. PACKER, Chairman, 29 Saunrlers Street. RECEPTION COMMITTEE : FINANCE COMMITTEE: E. J. MORRIS, Chairman, REV. M. C. LOCKWOOD, Chairman, 10 West Third Street. 2 Wesley Avenue. PRESS CO MMITTEE: MUSIC COMMITTEE: OSCAR B. 'l'ODHUNfER, Chairman, JAS. H. FILLMORE, Chairman, . 185 Race Street. 141 West Sixth Street. To Editors: Returns already received from the press of the country indicate that the National Prohibition Convention is attracting a great deal of attention this year, and will be better reported than any of the preceding five National Conventions of the party.
    [Show full text]
  • GEN. LEWIS CASS, Mexico Cali- It Tious Opposition to the Democratic Policy, Under Tho He on to Washington and Immediately Proceeded to the City of Paris
    Mr. Speech IXcsponscs of the Whig CuiiIil:Meft. ic of the Louisville Journal IVailcd Territorial IJill Vot upon its Passage. The German 1'urlinineut. In Chamberlain's Washington 2 ilia na State Sentinel. Judge Chamberlain, one of the Democratic Sena- The mystery of Taylor's long delay in answering to tlic Counter. City, July 27. 118. FitANKioKT, June 23. After remaining in session nil night, and until a Mr. Soiron proclaimed the following "law on tho torial Electors, to ap- the Whig Na- Greensburg, Ind., July 27, 1819. spoke in this according the official letter of President of the o city, y, New-Mexic- L?mAL TI01LAKCC IS THE rICt OF LIBEBTY. late hour to-da- the Senate passed tho Oregon, creation .f a Provisional Central Power for Ger- pointment, "Slaughter-House,- To the the Coon Skinner : I see in a on Saturday last. His speech was able tional " is at last fully explained. Editor of and California Territorial bill, by a vote of many " 44 Ky., called the f l AAI'Ol.IS, AUGUST 2, 1S48. and effective, os his speeches always are. He re- It nppears that Taylor refused " to take the letter little sheet published at Louisville, S3 to 22. I send you the names of those who voted " I. Until a Government he definitely created for e, a infamous article an ariicle bearing bill. Terms. viewed the past and the present attitude of tho whig of Gov. Morehead out of the post-offic- because the Journal, mo?t against the Germany, a Provisional Central Tower fhall be formed Our impress falsehood upon its own face, headed Nays Messrs.
    [Show full text]
  • The Vice Presidential Bust Collection Brochure, S
    Henry Wilson Garfield. Although his early political success had design for the American buffalo nickel. More than (1812–1875) ⓲ been through the machine politics of New York, 25 years after sculpting the Roosevelt bust, Fraser Daniel Chester French, Arthur surprised critics by fighting political created the marble bust of Vice President John 1886 corruption. He supported the first civil service Nance Garner for the Senate collection. THE Henry Wilson reform, and his administration was marked by epitomized the honesty and efficiency. Because he refused to Charles G. Dawes American Dream. engage in partisan politics, party regulars did not (1865–1951) VICE PRESIDENTIAL Born to a destitute nominate him in 1884. Jo Davidson, 1930 family, at age 21 he Prior to World War I, BUST COLLECTION Sculptor Augustus Saint-Gaudens originally walked to a nearby Charles Dawes was a declined to create Arthur’s official vice presidential town and began a lawyer, banker, and bust, citing his own schedule and the low business as a cobbler. Wilson soon embarked on politician in his native commission the Senate offered. Eventually he a career in politics, and worked his way from the Ohio. During the war, reconsidered, and delivered the finished work in Massachusetts legislature to the U.S. Senate. In a he became a brigadier politically turbulent era, he shifted political parties 1892. One of America’s best known sculptors, Saint-Gaudens also created the statue of Abraham general and afterwards several times, but maintained a consistent stand headed the Allied against slavery throughout his career. Wilson was Lincoln in Chicago’s Lincoln Park and the design reparations commission.
    [Show full text]
  • The President Also Had to Consider the Proper Role of an Ex­ * President
    ************************************~ * * * * 0 DB P H0 F E8 8 0 B, * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * The little-known * * story of how * a President of the * United States, Beniamin Harrison, helped launch Stanford law School. ************************************* * * * T H E PRESIDENT * * * * * * * * * * * * By Howard Bromberg, J.D. * * * TANFORD'S first professor of law was a former President of the United * States. This is a distinction that no other school can claim. On March 2, 1893, * L-41.,_, with two days remaining in his administration, President Benjamin Harrison * * accepted an appointment as Non-Resident Professor of Constitutional Law at * Stanford University. * Harrison's decision was a triumph for the fledgling western university and its * * founder, Leland Stanford, who had personally recruited the chief of state. It also * provided a tremendous boost to the nascent Law Department, which had suffered * months of frustration and disappointment. * David Starr Jordan, Stanford University's first president, had been planning a law * * program since the University opened in 1891. He would model it on the innovative * approach to legal education proposed by Woodrow Wilson, Jurisprudence Profes- * sor at Princeton. Law would be taught simultaneously with the social sciences; no * * one would be admitted to graduate legal studies who was not already a college * graduate; and the department would be thoroughly integrated with the life and * * ************************************** ************************************* * § during Harrison's four difficult years * El in the White House. ~ In 1891, Sena tor Stanford helped ~ arrange a presidential cross-country * train tour, during which Harrison * visited and was impressed by the university campus still under con­ * struction. When Harrison was * defeated by Grover Cleveland in the 1892 election, it occurred to Senator * Stanford to invite his friend-who * had been one of the nation's leading lawyers before entering the Senate­ * to join the as-yet empty Stanford law * faculty.
    [Show full text]
  • More Than Kids Stuff: Can News and Information Web Sites Mobilize Young Adults? SPONS AGENCY National Science Foundation, Washington, DC
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 473 027 SO 034 353 AUTHOR Lupia, Arthur; Philpot, Tasha S. TITLE More Than Kids Stuff: Can News and Information Web Sites Mobilize Young Adults? SPONS AGENCY National Science Foundation, Washington, DC. PUB DATE 2002-00-00 NOTE 33p.; Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association. (Boston, MA, August 28- September 2, 2002). CONTRACT 0094964 PUB TYPE Reports Research (143) Speeches/Meeting Papers (150) EDRS PRICE EDRS Price MF01/PCO2 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS *Internet; *Mass Media Effects; Media Research; *Presidential Campaigns (United States); *Voting; *Young Adults IDENTIFIERS News Sources; Political Communication; *Web Sites ABSTRACT Many young adults are not politically active. Since 1972, their participation and interest levels have declined not only in absolute terms but also relative to other voting-age groups. This paper examines how the Internet can reverse this trend. It focuses on how leading news and political information Web sites affected young adults during the closing weeks of the 2000 presidential election campaign. The data come from a survey that exposes citizens to Web sites under varying conditions. The data are used to document how individual sites change viewers' political interest and likely participation levels. Seemingly similar sites had dramatically different effects on young viewers. The analysis documents that sites which provide information effectively increase political interest and participation for all ages, but young and old differ significantly on which sites are effective. Findings suggest that using the Internet to increase youth political engagement entails unique, but discoverable, challenges. (Contains 21 references, 7 notes, and 4 tables.)(Author/BT) Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be made from the original document.
    [Show full text]
  • General Election 2000.Xls
    GENERAL ELECTION-NOVEMBER 7, 2000 O F F I C I A L R E S U L T S Precinct Counted TOTAL Early/AB 1 2 3 45678910111213141516171920 President & Vice President George W. Bush & Dick Cheney (R) 4472 1763 150 82 93 97 137 189 103 270 134 207 268 218 203 107 143 33 47 107 121 Al Gore & Joe Lieberman (D) 4208 1490 186 189 286 136 99 237 117 182 115 153 150 111 212 107 63 9 35 179 152 Harry Browne & Art Olivier (L) 73 31 7240441330514100030 John Hagelin & Nat Goldhaber (N) 14 23003001000100002020 Ralph Nader & Winona LaDuke (G) 820 226 69 52 78 29 28 57 23 28 27 36 11 14 23 16 9 1 2 43 48 Howard Phillips & J. Curtis Frazier (A) 601000100000030100000 Pat Buchanan & Ezola Foster (F) 42 18 3120010011414121020 Earl F. Dodge & W. Dean Watkins (P) 101000000000000000000 James Harris & Margaret Trowe (SW) 100000000000000010000 David McReynolds & Mary Cal Hollis (SP) 101000000000000000000 Representative to the 107th United States Congress District 3 Curtis Imrie (D) 2881 996 116 137 219 87 80 161 89 117 73 95 109 67 151 74 55 4 21 127 103 Scott McInnis (R) 5741 2229 238 131 181 148 156 244 134 333 177 265 297 255 239 125 153 35 54 176 171 Drew Sakson (L) 282 87 26 19 21 7 10 19 2 11 6 8 9 4 19 8 4 3 0 9 10 Victor A. Good (RP) 145 46 17 398685442346230177 Secretary of State - 2 year term Donetta Davidson (R) 4531 1827 165 106 113 114 142 179 115 267 147 204 247 193 172 95 125 32 44 121 123 Anthony Martinez (D) 3260 1108 143 137 228 108 92 191 86 133 87 114 125 100 171 85 64 5 22 141 120 Clyde J.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 3: the Rise of the Antinuclear Power Movement: 1957 to 1989
    Chapter 3 THE RISE OF THE ANTINUCLEAR POWER MOVEMENT 1957 TO 1989 In this chapter I trace the development and circulation of antinuclear struggles of the last 40 years. What we will see is a pattern of new sectors of the class (e.g., women, native Americans, and Labor) joining the movement over the course of that long cycle of struggles. Those new sectors would remain autonomous, which would clearly place the movement within the autonomist Marxist model. Furthermore, it is precisely the widening of the class composition that has made the antinuclear movement the most successful social movement of the 1970s and 1980s. Although that widening has been impressive, as we will see in chapter 5, it did not go far enough, leaving out certain sectors of the class. Since its beginnings in the 1950s, opposition to the civilian nuclear power program has gone through three distinct phases of one cycle of struggles.(1) Phase 1 —1957 to 1967— was a period marked by sporadic opposition to specific nuclear plants. Phase 2 —1968 to 1975— was a period marked by a concern for the environmental impact of nuclear power plants, which led to a critique of all aspects of nuclear power. Moreover, the legal and the political systems were widely used to achieve demands. And Phase 3 —1977 to the present— has been a period marked by the use of direct action and civil disobedience by protesters whose goals have been to shut down all nuclear power plants. 3.1 The First Phase of the Struggles: 1957 to 1967 Opposition to nuclear energy first emerged shortly after the atomic bomb was built.
    [Show full text]