General Consultations

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

General Consultations 12 TAYSIDE AND CENTRAL SCOTLAND TRANSPORT PARTNERSHIP RTP/13/21 18 JUNE 2013 GENERAL CONSULTATIONS REPORT BY STRATEGY MANAGER This report asks the Partnership to endorse an officer response to consultation on refresh of the Nestrans RTS and to remit consideration of a response to the Bus Regulation (Scotland) Bill proposals to the Executive Committee. 1 RECOMMENDATIONS 1.1 That the Partnership:- (i) endorses the officer response to consultation on the Nestrans Regional Transport Strategy refresh, as detailed in Appendix A; and (ii) agrees to remit consideration of responding to consultation on the Bus Regulation (Scotland) Bill to the Executive Committee. 2 BACKGROUND 2.1 Nestrans has consulted on their refresh of the Regional Transport Strategy (RTS). Consultation responses were to be submitted by 31 May 2013. The consultation documents are available for inspection. 2.2 Iain Gray MSP has started consultation on a Bus Regulation (Scotland) Bill. Consultation responses are to be submitted by 30 August 2013. The consultation document is available for inspection. 3 DISCUSSION Nestrans Regional Transport Strategy refresh 3.1 Nestrans has consulted on the refresh of their RTS. The purpose of the re-fresh to the 2008 RTS is not to change the direction of the RTS but to incorporate significant developments in policy and better align with the emerging Aberdeen City and Shire Strategic Development Plan. The RTS re-fresh document will form an addendum to the RTS published in 2008. 3.2 A response was made to consultation on the Aberdeen City and Shire Strategic Development Plan on 12 March 2013. This highlighted the need to take account of cross-Tactran/Nestrans boundary travel impacts as a consequence of SDP proposals for significant development in the Laurencekirk – Aberdeen corridor. 3.3 The officer response to the RTS refresh consultation is shown in Appendix A. Issues highlighted are promoting electrification of the Aberdeen – Central Belt railway lines and ensuring that account is taken of potentially increased demand for cross-boundary travel as a consequence of developments in the Laurencekirk – Aberdeen corridor. 1 Bus Regulation (Scotland) Bill 3.4 Iain Gray MSP has launched a consultation in connection with a draft proposal which he has lodged as the first stage in the process of introducing a Private Members' Bill in the Scottish Parliament. The Bus Regulation (Scotland) Bill would aim to provide transport authorities with greater powers to set service levels for local bus services, including a power to group profitable routes with non-profitable routes before they are put out to tender with operators, and greater ability to use local authority fleets to provide transport services. 3.5 The consultation seeks views on 8 specific questions regarding support for the general aims of the proposed Bill; views on the practical advantages or disadvantages of the proposed legislation; how regulation could be used to improve bus services; how community transport might be better utilised; whether the Traffic Commissioner should be able to impose greater penalties on operators who default on their responsibilities; assessment of the likely financial implications of the proposed Bill; views on any substantial implications on equality; and seeks any other comments or suggestions for inclusion in the proposed Bill. 3.6 The general ethos and principles underpinning the proposed Bill, which is aimed at giving transport authorities’ greater ability to influence the provision and stability of bus services and ensure that these meet the needs of communities, are likely to be widely supported. However, the proposals to grant transport authorities powers to bundle profitable and non-profitable routes without the need to prove “market failure” raise a number of potential questions and issues, including :- . compliance with competition and procurement legislation, including EU legislation; . public sector funding implications of franchising; . cross-boundary impacts on tendering and competition in franchised and non- franchised areas; . replacement of the current “market failure” test. 3.7 Discussions are continuing on the submission of a joint consultation response by the RTPs and a Tactran response with partner Councils. It is proposed to remit detailed consideration of responding to the consultation to the Executive Committee. 4 CONSULTATIONS 4.1 This report has been prepared in consultation with relevant officers from the four constituent Councils. 5 RESOURCE IMPLICATIONS 5.1 There are no resource implications arising directly from this report. 6 EQUALITIES IMPLICATIONS 6.1 There are no equality implications arising directly from this report. 2 Michael Cairns Strategy Manager Report prepared by Michael Cairns. For further information contact e-mail [email protected] or tel 01738 475774. NOTE No background papers, as defined by Section 50D of the Local Government (Scotland) Act 1973 (and not containing confidential or exempt information) were relied on to a material extent in preparing the above Report. 3 APPENDIX A Kirsty Chalmers Bordeaux House Transport Executive (Strategy & Delivery) 31 Kinnoull Street Nestrans PERTH Archibald Simpson House PH1 5EN 27-29 King Street Aberdeen Tel: 01738 475775 AB24 5AA Fax: 01738 639705 E-mail: [email protected] 31st May 2013 Dear Kirsty, RTS REFRESH – CONSULTATION Tactran welcomes the opportunity to respond to the above consultation. The Partnership supports and will work with Nestrans to achieve the RTS Vision and Strategic Objectives. Tactran’s primary interest is in the External Communications Strategy on pages 8 – 13 of the Refresh. Tactran welcomes the references to joint RTP working on cross-boundary connectivity and accessibility issues within this, and will continue to work with Nestrans in support of maintaining and enhancing strategic transport connections through the Tactran region to and from the north east. It is suggested that reference should be made specifically to electrification of the Edinburgh/Glasgow – Aberdeen route within this, and that this should be promoted as a high Scottish Government electrification priority upon completion of the current Edinburgh Glasgow Improvement Programme (EGIP) proposals. The desire for faster rail services, as identified in policy EC1, is noted. Whilst fully supportive of STPR Project 23 proposals to enhance rail services between Aberdeen and the Central Belt, Tactran does not support faster journey times being achieved at the expense of existing stopping patterns at key stations along the route within the Tactran region. Tactran’s own Tay Estuary Rail Strategy (TERS) identifies proposals for introducing “semi-fast” services, initially operating between Arbroath – Glasgow and in the longer term between Aberdeen – Glasgow, as a complement to faster services between Aberdeen – Edinburgh/Glasgow. Nestrans support for TERS, as a means of achieving the objective of faster Aberdeen – Central Belt rail journey times whilst maintaining and potentially enhancing rail connectivity at intermediate halts along the route, would be welcomed. Tactran supports and shares Nestrans views on the future development of High Speed Rail and the need to prioritise HSR connections between Scotland and the south, and also the need for rail service enhancements north of the Central Belt, as identified in the STPR, to be implemented as a complement to, and ideally ahead of, HSR. 4 With regard to the wording of Strategy EC2, Tactran would request that references to the need to improve the A90 “through” Dundee are amended to read “through or around Dundee”, reflecting the two options currently identified in STPR Project 29. In terms of the Internal Connections Strategy and Bus Improvements (IC3), it is recommended that consideration should be given to future cross-boundary bus service requirements and provision between Aberdeenshire and Angus as a consequence of development proposals in the Laurencekirk – Aberdeen Strategic Growth Area identified in the Aberdeen City and Shire Strategic Development Plan. In relation to Information, it is suggested that cross-RTP cooperation will be needed in considering further development of Real Time Information across the regional boundary. Under the Strategic Policy Framework, TB1 Tactran notes the reference to development of Car Clubs in the Mearns area and would welcome the opportunity to work jointly on such initiatives, where appropriate. Similarly, under strategy TB2, Tactran would welcome the opportunity to work with Nestrans in considering cross-boundary health and transport issues, linking with our own regional Health Transport Framework objectives, particularly in relation to access from the Mearns area to Stracathro Hospital and other regional health facilities. Tactran has no comments on the Strategic Environmental Assessment Environmental Report and Equalities Impact Assessment Report. If you require any further information, or clarification of any of the above comments, please contact Michael Cairns, Strategy Manager on 01738 475774 or [email protected]. Yours sincerely, Eric Guthrie Director 5 .
Recommended publications
  • Finalised Structure Plan Background Paper
    ABERDEEN Strategic Development CITY AND Planning Authority SHIRE Finalised Structure Plan Background Paper February 2009 Aberdeen City and Aberdeenshire (excluding the Cairngorms National Park) Structure Plan Area covered by the Aberdeen City and Shire Structure Plan The Finalised Structure Plan was submitted to Scottish Ministers on 27 February 2009. The following documents were published in support of the Finalised Plan and are available from the Strategic Development Planning Authority or can be downloaded from its website: Appropriate Assessment Publicity and Consultation Statement Equalities and Human Rights Impact Assessment Addendum to the Report of Survey Addendum to the Strategic Environmental Assessment Environmental Report Background Paper Aberdeen City and Shire Structure Plan Background Paper Background Aberdeen City and Aberdeenshire Councils formally started the preparation of a new structure plan for the area in February 2007. At the same time a ‘Report of Survey’ was published containing up-to-date information on the area in terms of its population and households, environment, economy, transport and housing. Purpose A draft structure plan was published for consultation in June 2008 and the finalised structure plan was submitted to Scottish Minister on 27 February 2009. However, the period February 2007 – February 2009 (the period between the publication of the Report of Survey and the finalised structure plan, a number of pieces of more up-to- date information have become available. It is necessary to provide an update on issues by way of background to the finalised structure plan. These relate to: 1. Aberdeen Western Peripheral Route (AWPR); 2. Population and Household Forecasts & Projections; 3. Brownfield Urban Capacity (Aberdeen); 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Freight Distribution Strategy
    4ABZ3 Freight Distribution Strategy Deliverable No.: 4ABZ3 WD2 Project Acronym: CIVITAS PORTIS Full Title: Port Cities-Innovation for Sustainability Grant Agreement No.: 690713 Workpackage/Measure No.: 4ABZ3 Workpackage/ Measure Title: Freight Distribution Centre Responsible Author(s): Rab Dickson & Nicola Laird Responsible Co-Author(s): Date: 23 November 2018 Status: Final Dissemination level: Public Cleaner and better transport in cities Abstract Not Applicable Project Partners Organisation Country Abbreviation Nestrans Document History Date Person Action Status Diss. Level 01/08 Nicola Laird First Draft Draft Internal 16/10 Nicola Laird Second Draft Draft Internal 23/11 Nicola Laird Final Draft Final Status: Draft, Final, Approved, and Submitted (to European Commission). Dissemination Level: PC = Project Coordinator, SC=Site Coordinator, TC=Technical Coordinator, EM=Evaluation Manager. Nestrans • November 2018 2 / 32 Cleaner and better transport in cities Table of Contents 1. Introduction and Background ..................................................................................... 4 1.1 Aberdeen in 2018 & the Future ............................................................................ 4 1.2 Previous Freight Work .......................................................................................... 9 2. Vision .......................................................................................................................... 12 3. Work To-Date ............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Nestrans Active Travel Action Plan (Actrap) 2014-2035 DRAFT
    Nestrans Active Travel Action Plan (AcTrAP) 2014-2035 DRAFT 1. Introduction 1.1. The Nestrans Regional Transport Strategy (published in 2008 and refreshed in 2013) states that ‘increasing the proportion of journeys undertaken on foot and by bicycle will make a significant contribution to achieving the strategy’s accessibility, health and environmental objectives’. 1.2. A commitment to develop an Active Travel Action Plan was included in the 2013 refresh of the RTS with the aim of encouraging increased levels of active travel across the region. This action plan contains a long term vision for active travel in the north east and covers the period to 2035 with a review to be carried out every five years in line with the RTS. 2. Policy Context 1.3. The need to develop an Active Travel Action Plan was identified in the 2013 refresh of the Nestrans Regional Transport Strategy (RTS). This action Case study – Copenhagen plan will sit alongside and complement action plans already developed for bus; rail; freight; 40 years ago Copenhagen health and transport; and the Nestrans travel was just as congested as planning strategy. many other major cities, but now 36% of the population arriving at work or education 1.4. As well as contributing to achieving the objectives do so on bicycles, travelling of the RTS, the Active Travel Action Plan also from all over the Metro area needs to take account of, and work alongside, a on over 1,000km of cycle number of other partners and policies in the lanes. north east of Scotland and nationally.
    [Show full text]
  • Aberdeen International Airport Consultative Committee Annual Report 2017
    ABERDEEN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT CONSULTATIVE COMMITTEE ABERDEEN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT CONSULTATIVE COMMITTEE ANNUAL REPORT 2017 1 ANNUAL REPORT 2017 ABERDEEN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT CONSULTATIVE COMMITTEE ABERDEEN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT CONSULTATIVE COMMITTEE ANNUAL REPORT 2017 Chairman’s Introduction This is the fourth formal annual report of the Aberdeen International Airport Consultative Committee (AIACC). Every UK airport of any size is required under civil aviation legislation to provide an appropriate mechanism for consultation on its activities with representatives of the communities most affected by its activities. In practice, this requirement is universally discharged by setting up an airport consultative committee (ACC) that meets local needs. The Aberdeen Committee has a history spanning more than 60 years, from when it was first established in 1953 at the request of the government of the day. The airport’s operations have grown exponentially since then and the airport continues to make an invaluable contribution to the economy of the north east of Scotland. We believe it is vitally important that we publish a summary of our work over the previous year. We pride ourselves on being one of the more proactive airport consultative committees in the UK. On the one hand, we seek to influence the operation of the airport for the wider benefit of all our stakeholders, including the local communities affected by the business. On the other, we have gained a reputation at UK and Scottish government level for making time to submit considered responses to a whole range of consultation documents affecting aviation strategy and practice. We are never more pleased than when we can see our views taken into account in government decision making.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix D NORTH EAST SCOTLAND TRANSPORT
    Appendix D NORTH EAST SCOTLAND TRANSPORT PARTNERSHIP Minute of Meeting of the North East Scotland Transport Partnership Board Aberdeen, 8 December, 2011 Present :- Councillor Yuill (Chairperson), and Councillors Boulton and Dean (Aberdeen City Council); Councillors Argyle, Clark, Robertson and Webster (Aberdeenshire Council); and Mr Eddie Anderson; and Dr Margaret Bochel and Mr Stephen Archer (Advisers to the Board). In Attendance :- Derick Murray, Rab Dickson and Kirsty Morrison, Nestrans Office; Julie Anderson (Aberdeenshire Council) and Martin Allan (Aberdeen City Council). Apologies :- Jennifer Craw and Derek Provan. The agenda and reports associated with this minute can be found at:- http://www.Nestrans.org.uk/47/board-meetings.html TREASURER TO THE BOARD 1. The Chair advised the Board that Derek Yule, Treasurer to the Board had left Aberdeenshire Council and that Alan Wood would be Acting Treasurer to the Board. The Chair welcomed Julie Anderson to her first meeting who would present the budget matters on behalf of the Acting Treasurer. The Board resolved :- to note the information. MINUTE OF PREVIOUS MEETING OF 5 OCTOBER, 2011 2. The Board had before it the minute of its previous meeting of 5 October, 2011. The Board resolved :- to approve the minute. LIAISON BETWEEN REGIONAL TRANSPORT PARTNERSHIPS (RTPs) AND THE SCOTTISH GOVERNMENT AND OTHERS 3. With reference to article 5 of the minute of the meeting of the Board of 5 October, 2011, the Board had before it a report by the Director which provided an update on liaison with other
    [Show full text]
  • Aberdeen City Local Transport Strategy
    Overall positive impact Health Impact Policy Scoping Assessment No impact/ neutral impact Overall negative impact Health Impact Physical Activity / Vulnerable Vulnerable modal Vulnerable Social Inclusion Social Environmental Mental Health Strategy/ Action Plan taken Likelihood: Severity: Obesity Groups Positive Number forward in (there is an groups Affected definite, major, Issues or of people assumption that all will be Populations probable moderate Negative affected contained within the Costed or possible or minor Social Action and Delivery Plan) SUPPORT Strategic Rail Network Walking and cycling can have significant health benefits. More people walking, Improved access to Aberdeen and cycling and taking the bus will result in Commuters, CCMP/ SUMP, Station Dyce railway stations by foot, increased physical activity levels benefitting Positive Visitors, Staff, Definite Moderate 10000s Gateway Development Brief, bicycle and public transport population health and addressing public All Users Active Travel Action Plan health issues that result from inactive population, as well as improved air quality Nestrans Rail Action Plan, More people able to take the train will result Commuters, Abellio and InterCity Annual in decrease use of cars, which in turn will Positive Visitors, Staff, Definite Minor 10000s Plans, National Transport improve air quality All Users Strategy Additional rail services including increased no. or trains and new Population stations Nestrans Rail Action Plan, Noise pollution increase near rail lines as a living in Abellio and InterCity Annual result of new train stations / increased Negative proximity to Definite Minor 1000s Plans, National Transport number of trains stations/ train Strategy lines Nestrans Rail Action Plan, More people taking the train will improve air Commuters, Abellio and InterCity Annual Additional carriages quality.
    [Show full text]
  • Aberdeen Local Development Plan : 2017 1 Andrew Brownrigg 01224 523317
    aberdeen local development plan 2017 Aberdeen Local Development Plan : 2017 1 Andrew Brownrigg 01224 523317 2 Aberdeen Local Development Plan : 2017 Contents 1 / Introduction page 6 Vision 7 National Planning Framework for Scotland 7 Aberdeen City and Shire Strategic Development Plan 8 Aberdeen Local Development Plan – Working Towards the Vision 8 How to use the Plan 9 2 / The Spatial Strategy page 10 Overview 11 Brownfield Sites 11 Greenfield Development 13 Land Release 14 Delivery of Mixed Communities 14 Directions for Growth 15 Bridge of Don/ Grandhome 15 Dyce, Bucksburn and Woodside 16 Kingswells and Greenferns 17 Countesswells 18 Deeside 19 Loirston and Cove 20 3 / Delivering Sustainable Communities page 22 Quality Placemaking by Design 23 The Network of Centres 35 Delivering Infrastructure, Transport and Accessibility 43 Supporting Business and Industrial Development 53 Meeting Housing and Community Needs 58 Protecting and Enhancing the Natural Environment 67 Using Resources Sustainably 83 4 / Monitoring and Review page 92 5 / Glossary page 95 6 / Appendices page 98 1. Brownfield Sites 99 2. Opportunity Sites 101 3. Infrastructure Requirements for Masterplan Zones 114 4. Masterplans 117 5. Supplementary Guidance 118 6. Schedule of Land Owned by Local Authority 119 2 Aberdeen Local Development Plan : 2017 Aberdeen Local Development Plan : 2017 3 4 Aberdeen Local Development Plan : 2017 Aberdeen Local Development Plan : 2017 5 Foreword I am delighted to present Aberdeen’s new Local Development Plan. In 2012, Aberdeen became the first local authority in Scotland to adopt a Local Development Plan under the new planning system. We have now become the first to adopt a second Plan, therefore ensuring that, along with the Aberdeen City and Shire Strategic Development Plan 2014, we have one of the most ambitious and up-to-date development plan positions in Scotland.
    [Show full text]
  • 8. Nestrans Regional Transport Strategy, Consultation And
    Item: 8 Page: 104 Infrastructure Services REPORT TO INFASTRUCTURE SERVICES COMMITTEE NESTRANS REGIONAL TRANSPORT STRATEGY CONSULTATION & ABERDEEN CITY REGION DEAL STRATEGIC TRANSPORT ASSESSMENT 1 Reason for Report/Summary 1.1 This report invites Members to discuss the proposed Nestrans Regional Transport Strategy and City Region Deal Strategic Transport Assessment STAG1 Report. 2 Recommendations The Committee is recommended to: 2.1 Consider the issues raised in the Regional Transport Strategy and City Region Deal Strategic Transport Assessment; 2.2 Consider the comments received from Area Committees; 2.3 Comment on the proposed Regional Transport Strategy and the priorities identified in the Strategic Transport Assessment and agree the broad response to Nestrans and the City Region Deal Joint Committee; and 2.4 Delegate the final submission of the consultation response to the Director of Infrastructure Services following consultation with the Chair, Vice Chair and Opposition spokesperson for Infrastructure Services Committee. 3 Purpose and Decision-Making Route 3.1 Some Members have had the opportunity to contribute to the Draft Regional Transport Strategy either through membership of the Nestrans Board or through workshops and engagement events. 3.2 Area Committees’ comments have been sought and those received to date form Appendix 5 to this report. The remaining comments will be tabled in advance of or at the Infrastructure Services Committee meeting on 1 October to inform the Committee’s discussion on the Council response to the draft strategy. 3.3 Members have also had the opportunity to contribute to the Strategic Transport Appraisal through member briefings and events. This area of work will be considered by the City Region Deal Joint Committee in due course.
    [Show full text]
  • Sustainable Road Freight in Port Cities: Aberdeen and Civitas Portis
    HOOD, C., LAING, R., GRAY, D., BURROWS, N., DICKSON, R. and ROBINSON, A. 2019. Sustainable road freight in port cities: Aberdeen and Civitas Portis. Presented at the 2019 Scottish transport applications and research conference (2019 STAR) [online], 22 May 2019, Glasgow, UK. Available from: http://starconference.org.uk/star/2019/Hood.pdf Sustainable road freight in port cities: Aberdeen and Civitas Portis. HOOD, C., LAING, R., GRAY, D., BURROWS, N., DICKSON, R., ROBINSON, A. 2019 This document was downloaded from https://openair.rgu.ac.uk Sustainable Road Freight in Port Cities – Aberdeen and CIVITAS PORTIS Caroline Hood1, Professor Richard Laing2, Professor David Gray3, Neale Burrows4, Rab Dickson5 and Amye Robinson6 Abstract The CIVITAS PORTIS (PORT-cities: Innovation for Sustainability) Project is a Horizon 2020 initiative concerned with the design, demonstration and evaluation of integrated packages of sustainable mobility measures in five major port cities in Europe. The intended purpose of the project is to demonstrate that both function and social cohesion between city centres and ports can be increased through sustainable mobility. Within the context of the PORTIS project, Aberdeen City Council (“ACC”) in partnership with Aberdeen Harbour Board, Aberdeenshire Council and Nestrans (the Regional Transport Partnership) will seek to implement a number of measures designed to improve the efficiency of urban freight transport. A key aspect of the project regards the ways in which emerging digital technology can help cities realise efficiency gains and environmental benefits in relation to freight movement. The impact of smart city infrastructure is still to be felt in many respects (e.g. participatory democracy, digital planning, building condition monitoring), yet had already been implemented by both the public and private sectors in Aberdeen.
    [Show full text]
  • North East of Scotland Transport Partnership: Annual Audit Plan 2020/21
    North East of Scotland Transport Partnership Annual Audit Plan 2020/21 Prepared for North East of Scotland Transport Partnership March 2021 Who we are The Auditor General, the Accounts Commission and Audit Scotland work together to deliver public audit in Scotland: • The Auditor General is an independent crown appointment, made on the recommendation of the Scottish Parliament, to audit the Scottish Government, NHS and other bodies and report to Parliament on their financial health and performance. • The Accounts Commission is an independent public body appointed by Scottish Ministers to hold local government to account. The Controller of Audit is an independent post established by statute, with powers to report directly to the Commission on the audit of local government. • Audit Scotland is governed by a board, consisting of the Auditor General, the chair of the Accounts Commission, a non-executive board chair, and two non-executive members appointed by the Scottish Commission for Public Audit, a commission of the Scottish Parliament. About us Our vision is to be a world-class audit organisation that improves the use of public money. Through our work for the Auditor General and the Accounts Commission, we provide independent assurance to the people of Scotland that public money is spent properly and provides value. We aim to achieve this by: • carrying out relevant and timely audits of the way the public sector manages and spends money • reporting our findings and conclusions in public • identifying risks, making clear and relevant recommendations. North East of Scotland Transport Partnership Annual Audit Plan 2020/21 | 3 Contents Risks and planned work 4 Audit scope and timing 7 4 | Risks and planned work 1.
    [Show full text]
  • (Rts) Nestrans A
    Appendix C – Response from Aberdeen City Council (ACC) to the NESTRANS 2040 Draft Regional Transport Strategy (RTS) Your Ref: NESTRANS2040 Our Ref: ACC/RTS2040 Contact: Alan Simpson Location: [email protected] Date: 16/10/2020 NESTRANS Archibald Simpson House 27-29 King Street Aberdeen AB24 5AA Dear Sir/ Madam RESPONSE FROM ABERDEEN CITY COUNCIL (ACC) TO THE NESTRANS 2040 DRAFT REGIONAL TRANSPORT STRATEGY (RTS) Thank you very much for the opportunity to comment on the draft Regional Transport Strategy, NESTRANS 2040. Please find below the comments from Aberdeen City Council. If you have any questions or queries regarding these, please contact Alan Simpson, Senior Planner, Aberdeen City Council. General Comments The Council believes that there is a need to reference climate more tangibly and strengthen this theme. Although it is mentioned, there is still a bit of confusion around emissions (carbon/climate change) and (NO2). It would be beneficial for the RTS to reference the Net Zero plans in more detail as this would help to keep the pressure on the council regarding our own transport patterns. The RTS should seek to raise the bar and build on initiatives like Spaces for People and present making town and city centres more people friendly for the benefit of tourists and visitors and not just residents. Links should be made to the key economic drivers such as the NPF4 projects and the Energy Transition Fund projects The STA appraisal paper references 5 option categories, one of which is strategic connectivity. The RTS feels light in terms of global connectivity of the city in a post Brexit world.
    [Show full text]
  • REGIONAL TRANSPORT STRATEGY for the NORTH EAST of SCOTLAND Draft for Consultation August 2020 Nestrans Regional Transport Strategy 2040
    REGIONAL TRANSPORT STRATEGY FOR THE NORTH EAST OF SCOTLAND Draft for Consultation August 2020 Nestrans Regional Transport Strategy 2040 2 Nestrans Regional Transport Strategy 2040 Chair’s Foreword I am delighted to bring forward this draft Regional Transport Strategy for consultation. Nestrans’ first strategy was produced in 2008 and was ambitious and aspirational. It contained a package of over a billion pounds’ worth of new infrastructure and at the time, many thought that it was unlikely to be achieved. However, here we are twelve years later with a new Western Peripheral Route, with upgraded railway infrastructure, new and refurbished rolling stock, expanded airport terminal and runway, a new harbour under construction, Park & Ride sites, cycling infrastructure and other road schemes including a new crossing of the River Don and an upgrade at Inveramsay Bridge. However, there is still much to do. The next stage in our strategy will be less about new infrastructure and more about making the most of our assets, especially our new and upgraded assets, and influencing behaviours to optimise the networks that we have. We need to lock in the benefits to ensure that traffic growth does not undermine the progress that we have made. The success of the previous strategy was founded on sound business cases creating a balanced package of measures. It was not a wishlist of grand ideas which were undeliverable and unaffordable. This strategy also avoids lists of unattainable “nice to have” schemes, which may be superficially attractive but would not achieve the objectives of the partners. Nestrans has recently conducted studies into a number of schemes such as reopening rail lines, dualling and upgrading roads or junctions, but has determined that not all of these are likely to meet the criteria for investment.
    [Show full text]