DOCSLIB.ORG

Lesser Antillean Bullfinch (L

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Lesser Antillean Bullfinch (L 1st Caribaea Initiative Research and Conservation Workshop,22-24 March 2016, Martinique Phylogeography and genetic differentiation between Loxigilla noctis and L. barbadensis in the Lesser Antilles Sophie Arnaud-Haond1, Carla Daniel2, Sébastien Motreuil3, Julia Horrocks2 & Frank Cézilly3 1 IFREMER, Sète, France 2 Department of Biological and Chemical Sciences, The University of the West Indies, Barbados 3 Université de Bourgogne, UMR CNRS 6282 Biogéosciences, Dijon, France 1st Caribaea Initiative Research and Conservation Workshop,22-24 March 2016, Martinique The Caribbean region: a natural laboratory for the study of speciation Losos & Thorpe (2004) Anolis roquet More than 100 species of anoles on the Greater Antilles. (N) = number of species within each terminal clade. Ecological speciation in Chondrilla nucula reef mangrove Duran &Rützler (2006) 1st Caribaea Initiative Research and Conservation Workshop,22-24 March 2016, Martinique Speciation in the Caribbean-endemic genus Loxigilla Saint Kitts Bullfinch Puerto Rican Bullfinch Greater Antillean Bullfinch Lesser Antillean Bullfinch (L. portoricensis grandis) (L. portoricensis) (L. violacea), (Loxigilla noctis) † end of the 19th century (Raffaele 1977; (Raffaele et al. 1998) Garrido & Wiley 2003). 1st Caribaea Initiative Research and Conservation Workshop,22-24 March 2016, Martinique Loxigilla spp.: a paraphyletic group ! Eurneornis campestris L. portoricensis L. violacea Melanopyrrha nigra Loxipasser anoxanthus L. noctis L. barbadensis Tiaris canorus 1st Caribaea Initiative Research and Conservation Workshop,22-24 March 2016, Martinique Loxigilla spp.: a paraphyletic group ! Eurneornis campestris L. portoricensis L. violacea Melanopyrrha nigra Loxipasser anoxanthus L. noctis L. barbadensis Tiaris canorus 1st Caribaea Initiative Research and Conservation Workshop,22-24 March 2016, Martinique Geographic variation within Lesser Antillean Bullfinches Buckley & Buckley (2004) 1st Caribaea Initiative Research and Conservation Workshop,22-24 March 2016, Martinique Reduced sexual dimorphism in L. barbadensis Audet et al. 2014 1st Caribaea Initiative Research and Conservation Workshop,22-24 March 2016, Martinique Is Loxigilla barbadensis a true species? “we suggest that the form of ‘Lesser Antillean Bullfinch’ on Barbados is best treated as a separate biological species, Barbados Bullfinch Loxigilla barbadensis Cory 1886, which probably colonised Barbados from St Lucia around 180,000–700,000 y BP, and which has achieved specific status since its arrival. As such this represents one of the more rapid examples of avian speciation” 1st Caribaea Initiative Research and Conservation Workshop,22-24 March 2016, Martinique Loxigilla sp.: a first biogeographical study Lovette et al. (1999) studied mtDNA from Lesser Antillean Bullfinches from Barbados (barbadensis), St Lucia (sclateri), and St Vincent (crissalis). Sequencing of the the entire 894– bp mtDNA genomes for ATPase 6 and ATPase 8 for five barbadensis and sclateri , + RFLP and sequencing for 21 barbadensis and 32 sclateri : 1. no evidence for founder-effect 2. One lineages on each islands (i.e., reciprocal monophyly) 3. Only 3 to 5 substitutions among the three islands: 0.60% nucleotide divergence between barbadensis and crissalis and only 0.36% between barbadensis and sclateri, suggesting St Lucia to be Barbados’s source population; 4. Assuming a uniform molecular clock, a low level of mtDNA differentiation on Barbados indicates a relatively recent colonisation event. 1st Caribaea Initiative Research and Conservation Workshop,22-24 March 2016, Martinique Loxigilla sp.: field observations According to average observations and phylogeohgraphy, one lineage per island, with L. barbadensis being easily recognizable on the basis of its wholly black males, BUT occasional occurrences of partially or wholly black male bullfinches on Barbados (e.g. Hellmayr 1938, Bird 1983, Cézilly et al. 2003): • new St Lucia or St Vincent immigrants? • residual ancestral variation within barbadensis? 1st Caribaea Initiative Research and Conservation Workshop,22-24 March 2016, Martinique A population genetics analysis mtDNA: maternally inherited One mitochondrial DNA (ab. 730 bp of Guadeloupe the cytochrome b) and 14 microsatellite markers were used on samples from four Caribbean islands to provide Martinique • A genetic test of taxonomic Sainte Lucie hypothesis • A first step toward retracing the Barbados history of colonization of the islands: North South, South North, multiple 100 km colonizations? 1st Caribaea Initiative Research and Conservation Workshop,22-24 March 2016, Martinique Mitochondrial DNA 234 sequences 727 base pair cytochrome b Guadeloupe Martinique Sainte Lucie Barbados 100 km H=13 When is a species a species? • Biological species concept, according to Ernst Mayr (1940): « groups of actually or potentially interbreeding natural populations, which are reproductively isolated from other such groups” • Hardly amenable to experimental tests for most cases Looking for the best proxy: Proxy for species delineation in biodiversity assessment? • Morphology, Phenetic species concept: A species is a set of organisms that look similar to each other and distinct from other sets (Ridley, 1993). But phenotypic plasticity, synonymous species, cryptic species… • Genetic divergence, Evolutionary species concept: A species is a lineage (an ancestral-descendant sequence of populations) evolving separately from others and with its own unitary evolutionary roles and tendencies (Simpson, 1961). 1st Caribaea Initiative Research and Conservation Workshop,22-24 March 2016, Martinique Species or not species? There seems to be • Morphological differences • Reciprocal monophyly with the Barbados, BUT 3 individuals with Ste Lucie or Martinique haplotypes caught in Barbados • A large divergence of Guadeloupe compared to Ste Lucie and Martinique, despite some haplotypes of Guadeloupe are caught in Martinique Yet all this based on one single loci (variance) only maternally inherited (what is migration is sex-specific?) => Real species on their way to accumulate more divergence, or diverge lineages on their way toward rehomogeneization? With outgroups L. noctis ? L. violacea L. barbadensis L. portoricensis 1st Caribaea Initiative Research and Conservation Workshop,22-24 March 2016, Martinique Can nuclear DNA help? 14 microsatellites DIVERSITY DIFFERENTIATION • Similar level of allelic • Averaging methods: richness: between 7.6 Fst estimates show and 8 once standardized systematic differentiation, for the lowest sample size unclear: Martinique more (25) different from Ste Lucie • Similar levels of than from Barbados heterozygosity (0.67 to 0.72) Guadeloupe Martinique Sainte-Lucie Barbados Guadeloupe 0.000 0.027 0.039 0.037 • Heterozygote deficiency Martinique 0.000 0.033 0.030 from null in Barbados to Sainte-Lucie 0.000 0.030 0.1 in Ste Lucy Barbados 0.000 1st Caribaea Initiative Research and Conservation Workshop,22-24 March 2016, Martinique Clustering method: individual centered Nuclear DNA Guadeloupe Martinique Sainte Lucie Barbados 100 km 1st Caribaea Initiative Research and Conservation Workshop,22-24 March 2016, Martinique Species or not species? 3 clusters Guadeloupe Martinique Sainte Lucie Barbados 100 km The second clusters seems to be a contact area with the other two genetic backgrounds, assignment tests confirm it may receives migrant from the Northern and Southern clusters 1st Caribaea Initiative Research and Conservation Workshop,22-24 March 2016, Martinique Bottleneck tests • Significant results to bottleneck tests on microsatellites data in the four islands (using an IAM or TPM model and Wilcoxon or standardized difference tests) • Fu & Li test on mitochondrial sequences shows significant hints of a bottleneck in Barbados only 1st Caribaea Initiative Research and Conservation Workshop,22-24 March 2016, Martinique Summary • Results show there are three genetic backgrounds from Guadeloupe to Sainte Lucie: • L. noctis is differentiated with two distinct backgrounds both for mitochondrial and nuclear DNA in Guadeloupe versus Martinique & Ste-Lucie • L. barbadensis is represented by the third genetic cluster/background, slightly more divergent on mtDNA • L noctis from Martinique and Sainte-Lucie seem to receive influence from the other two genetic backgrounds =>Are the observations of bottleneck and exchanges linked to recent anthropogenic influence or are they the remnant of the history of colonization? 1st Caribaea Initiative Research and Conservation Workshop,22-24 March 2016, Martinique Questions? .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Lesser Antilles Incuding Trinidad
    The brilliant Lesser Antillean Barn Owl again showed superbly. One of several potential splits not yet recognized by the IOC (Pete Morris) THE LESSER ANTILLES INCUDING TRINIDAD 5 – 20/25 JUNE 2015 LEADERS: PETE MORRIS After our successful tour around the Caribbean in 2013, it was great to get back again this year. It all seemed pretty straightforward this time around, and once again we cleaned up on all of the available endemics, po- 1 BirdQuest Tour Report:The Lesser Antilles www.birdquest-tours.com The fabulous White-breasted Thrasher from Martinique (Pete Morris) tential splits and other goodies. For sure, this was no ordinary Caribbean holiday! During the first couple of weeks we visited no fewer than ten islands (Antigua, Barbuda, Montserrat, Dominica, Guadeloupe, Martinique, St Lucia, St Vincent, Barbados and Grenada), a logistical feat of some magnitude. With plenty of LIAT flights (the islanders refer to LIAT as ‘Leave Island any Time’ and ‘Luggage in Another Terminal’ to name but two of the many funny phrases coined from LIAT) and unreliable AVIS car hire reservations, we had our work cut out, but in the end, all worked out! It’s always strange birding on islands with so few targets, but with so many islands to pack-in, we were never really short of things to do. All of the endemics showed well and there were some cracking highlights, including the four smart endemic amazons, the rare Grenada Dove, the superb Lesser Antillean Barn Owl, the unique tremblers and White-breasted Thrashers, and a series of colourful endemic orioles to name just a few! At the end of the Lesser Antilles adventure we enjoyed a few days on Trinidad.
    [Show full text]
  • Revision of the Endemic West Indian Genus Melopyrrha from Cuba and the Cayman Islands
    Orlando H. Garrido et al. 134 Bull. B.O.C. 2014 134(2) Revision of the endemic West Indian genus Melopyrrha from Cuba and the Cayman Islands by Orlando H. Garrido, James W. Wiley, Arturo Kirkconnell, Patricia E. Bradley, Alexandra Günther-Calhoun & Daysi Rodríguez Received 18 September 2013 Summary.—Hartert described the Grand Cayman population of Melopyrrha as separate from the Cuban population, but the two forms were considered conspecifc by Bond and later authors. Based on diferences in body size, plumage and vocalisations, we recommend the two populations be treated as separate endemic species: Cuban Bullfnch Melopyrrha nigra on Cuba, Isla de Pinos and cays of the Cuban archipelago, and Cayman Bullfnch M. taylori for Grand Cayman. We present natural history information for both populations. Cuban Bullfnch Melopyrrha nigra occurs in the Cuban archipelago and on Grand Cayman in the Cayman Islands (Garrido & García Montaña 1975, AOU 1998, 2012, Rafaele et al. 1998, Bradley & Rey-Millet 2013). Bonaparte described the genus Melopyrrha in 1853 based on Loxia nigra named by Linnaeus. Cuban Bullfnch, called Negrito in Cuba and Black Sparrow in the Cayman Islands, was described by Linnaeus in 1758 under the name Loxia nigra, based on material from Cuba. In his earliest works, Gundlach (1856, 1876) was unaware that the bullfnch’s range extended to the Cayman Islands, but mentioned Grand Cayman in a later (1893: 110)­­ publication, as did Cory (1892: 112). The Cayman population was considered the same as the Cuban taxon until Hartert (1896) described the Grand Cayman population as Melopyrrha taylori. For several years, both taxa were treated Figure 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 85, No. 74/Thursday, April 16, 2020/Notices
    21262 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 74 / Thursday, April 16, 2020 / Notices acquisition were not included in the 5275 Leesburg Pike, Falls Church, VA Comment (1): We received one calculation for TDC, the TDC limit would not 22041–3803; (703) 358–2376. comment from the Western Energy have exceeded amongst other items. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Alliance, which requested that we Contact: Robert E. Mulderig, Deputy include European starling (Sturnus Assistant Secretary, Office of Public Housing What is the purpose of this notice? vulgaris) and house sparrow (Passer Investments, Office of Public and Indian Housing, Department of Housing and Urban The purpose of this notice is to domesticus) on the list of bird species Development, 451 Seventh Street SW, Room provide the public an updated list of not protected by the MBTA. 4130, Washington, DC 20410, telephone (202) ‘‘all nonnative, human-introduced bird Response: The draft list of nonnative, 402–4780. species to which the Migratory Bird human-introduced species was [FR Doc. 2020–08052 Filed 4–15–20; 8:45 am]‘ Treaty Act (16 U.S.C. 703 et seq.) does restricted to species belonging to biological families of migratory birds BILLING CODE 4210–67–P not apply,’’ as described in the MBTRA of 2004 (Division E, Title I, Sec. 143 of covered under any of the migratory bird the Consolidated Appropriations Act, treaties with Great Britain (for Canada), Mexico, Russia, or Japan. We excluded DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 2005; Pub. L. 108–447). The MBTRA states that ‘‘[a]s necessary, the Secretary species not occurring in biological Fish and Wildlife Service may update and publish the list of families included in the treaties from species exempted from protection of the the draft list.
    [Show full text]
  • The Birds of BARBADOS
    BOU CHECKLIST SERIES: 24 The Birds of BARBADOS P.A. Buckley, Edward B. Massiah Maurice B. Hutt, Francine G. Buckley and Hazel F. Hutt v Contents Dedication iii Editor’s Foreword ix Preface xi Acknowledgements xv Authors’ Biographies xviii List of tables xx List of figures xx List of plates xx The Barbados Ecosystem Introduction 1 Topography 3 Geology 7 Geomorphology 7 Pedology 8 Climate, weather and winds 9 Freshwater and wetlands 13 Vegetation and floristics 14 Non-avian vertebrates 16 Freshwater fishes 16 Amphibians 17 Reptiles 17 Mammals 18 Historical synopsis 19 Prehistoric era 19 Colonial and modern eras 20 Conservation concerns 23 Avifauna 25 Historical accounts 25 Museum collectors and collections 26 Field observations 27 Glossary 27 vi Frequency of Occurrence and Numerical Abundance 28 Vagrancy 29 The Species of Barbados Birds 30 Vicariance, Dispersal and Geographical Origins 36 Historical Changes in the Barbados Avifauna 38 Extinction versus Introduction 39 The Role of Vagrancy 39 Endemism 42 Molecular Insights 42 Seabirds 45 Shorebirds 45 Land-birds 46 Habitat Limitations 46 Core Barbados Species 47 Potential Additions to the Barbados Avifauna 47 Annual North- and Southbound Migration 48 Elevational Migration 49 Recovery of Ringed Birds 49 Radar and Mist-net Studies of Migration 50 Inter-island Movements by Ostensibly Resident Land-birds 52 Austral and Trinidad & Tobago Migrants 53 Overwintering Migrants 54 Oversummering Migrants 54 Fossil and Archaeological Birds 55 Research Agenda 56 Systematic List Introduction 59 Taxonomy
    [Show full text]
  • The Lesser Antillean Bullfinch in the Virgin Islands
    338 THE WILSON BULLETIN . Vol. 89, No. 2 successful feeding attempts. We noted, however, that aggressive and non-aggressive sandpipers had similar feeding attempt rates. According to Recher and Recher (Wilson Bull. 81:14%154, 1969) a point is reached when the frequency and intensity of aggression among sandpipers declines as they be- come more concentrated in an area of abundant food. The adult sandpipers we watched may have reached this point but the juveniles may not have-possibly because they were less efficient than adults (see Recher, Ecology 47: 393-403, 1966) in catching prey and therefore had a higher threshhold for lowering aggression. We thank D. G. Ainley, J. P. Hailman, and M. A. Howe for their helpful comments. This report is part of the results we have obtained in studies of migratory shorebirds funded by the Migratory Bird and Habitat Research Station, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Contract No. 14-16-0008-687.-B~1~~ A. HARRINCTON AND SARAII GROVES,& ano-‘ met Bird Observatory, Manomet, MA 02345. (Present Address SG: Dept. of Zoology, Univ. of British Columbia, Vancouver, B.C.). Accepted 9 Apr. 1976. Herring Gull eating bayberry.-Several studies of the Herring Gull (Larus argen- tutus) (Harris, Ibis 107:43-53, 1965; Threlfall, C an. Field-Nat. 82:176-180, 1968; Tin- bergen, The Herring Gulls’ World, 1960) h ave demonstrated the omnivorous and opportunistic qualities of its diet. In addition to the well known animal and garbage com- ponents, Herring Gulls consume grasses, grain, and blueberries (Vaccineurn angustifolium) when available (Threlfall, Nature in Wales 11:67-73, 1968; Davis, Br.
    [Show full text]
  • THE LESSER ANTILLES: Aboard the Sea Cloud
    THE LESSER ANTILLES: Aboard the Sea Cloud FEBRUARY 10-18, 2016 Red-necked Parrot, Amazona arausiaca LEADERS: VICTOR EMANUEL, BARRY LYON, DAVID ASCANIO, PETER ZIKA & JOHN HARRISON COMPILED BY: DAVID ASCANIO VICTOR EMANUEL NATURE TOURS, INC. 2525 WALLINGWOOD DRIVE, SUITE 1003 AUSTIN, TEXAS 78746 WWW.VENTBIRD.COM THE LESSER ANTILLES ABOARD THE SEA CLOUD FEBRUARY 10-18, 2016 By David Ascanio Once again, a sea with pastel blue or green colors, an incredible and rich history, outstanding cuisine, and the beautiful and breathtaking Sea Cloud, combined with exquisite birds resulted in a memorable journey across six of the Lesser Antilles to see all of the endemic parrots, tremblers, hummingbirds, orioles, and bullfinches that these islands offer. Our treasure wasn’t gold, nor sugar. It was every one of the endemic or the restricted distribution birds. It seemed as if every island offered a unique challenge to finding these treasures. Barbados was the easy task. In Dominica and Martinique we practiced patience. In Guadeloupe we built a successful group dynamic, while St. Lucia and St. Vincent challenged us with trails. Each day offered a unique experience, as if each of the Lesser Antilles had a distinctive personality. We started in British-flavored Barbados. A visit to the Graeme Hall Reserve allowed views of one of the few populations of Little Egret in the Americas. We also saw our first target species, the Barbados Bullfinch, one that’s so common that you can see it wandering around the swimming pool area of the hotel. After a full day sailing north, we made it to Dominica.
    [Show full text]
  • FIELD GUIDES BIRDING TOURS: Lesser Antilles 2013
    Field Guides Tour Report Lesser Antilles 2013 Mar 30, 2013 to Apr 14, 2013 Jesse Fagan I hadn't run this tour for three years so I was a little bit curious about how things had changed on "the islands." I am always nervous about the connecting flights, lost baggage (LIAT don't let us down!), and general logistics on this logistically complicated tour. However, we seem to have it down to a science after years of practice, and LIAT has gotten better! It was a great tour in 2013. We saw all of the Lesser Antilles' endemics very well including great looks at the tough ones: Grenada Dove (my closest and best encounter ever; and at the last minute!), Imperial Parrot (chasing a pair through the Syndicate forest and eventually having them right over our heads!), St. Lucia Black-Finch (at our feet; and it does have pink feet!), and White-breasted Thrasher (twelve, count 'em twelve! on the island of Martinique). It was an adventure and I want to thank this most excellent group for doing it with me. I can't wait to see you all again. More a bird of the Greater Antilles, the White-crowned Pigeon reaches the northern Lesser Antilles --Jesse aka Mot (from Lima, Peru) islands of Antigua and Barbuda, where it is quite common. (Photo by tour participant Greg Griffith) KEYS FOR THIS LIST One of the following keys may be shown in brackets for individual species as appropriate: * = heard only, I = introduced, E = endemic, N = nesting, a = austral migrant, b = boreal migrant BIRDS Anatidae (Ducks, Geese, and Waterfowl) WEST INDIAN WHISTLING-DUCK (Dendrocygna arborea) – A number along Antigua Village Ponds.
    [Show full text]
  • Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B
    Downloaded from http://rstb.royalsocietypublishing.org/ on February 29, 2016 Feeding innovations in a nested phylogeny of Neotropical passerines rstb.royalsocietypublishing.org Louis Lefebvre, Simon Ducatez and Jean-Nicolas Audet Department of Biology, McGill University, 1205 avenue Docteur Penfield, Montre´al, Que´bec, Canada H3A 1B1 Several studies on cognition, molecular phylogenetics and taxonomic diversity Research independently suggest that Darwin’s finches are part of a larger clade of speciose, flexible birds, the family Thraupidae, a member of the New World Cite this article: Lefebvre L, Ducatez S, Audet nine-primaried oscine superfamily Emberizoidea. Here, we first present a new, J-N. 2016 Feeding innovations in a nested previously unpublished, dataset of feeding innovations covering the Neotropi- phylogeny of Neotropical passerines. Phil. cal region and compare the stem clades of Darwin’s finches to other neotropical Trans. R. Soc. B 371: 20150188. clades at the levels of the subfamily, family and superfamily/order. Both in http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2015.0188 terms of raw frequency as well as rates corrected for research effort and phylo- geny, the family Thraupidae and superfamily Emberizoidea show high levels of innovation, supporting the idea that adaptive radiations are favoured when Accepted: 25 November 2015 the ancestral stem species were flexible. Second, we discuss examples of inno- vation and problem-solving in two opportunistic and tame Emberizoid species, One contribution of 15 to a theme issue the Barbados bullfinch Loxigilla barbadensis and the Carib grackle Quiscalus ‘Innovation in animals and humans: lugubris fortirostris in Barbados. We review studies on these two species and argue that a comparison of L.
    [Show full text]
  • Proposals 2018-C
    AOS Classification Committee – North and Middle America Proposal Set 2018-C 1 March 2018 No. Page Title 01 02 Adopt (a) a revised linear sequence and (b) a subfamily classification for the Accipitridae 02 10 Split Yellow Warbler (Setophaga petechia) into two species 03 25 Revise the classification and linear sequence of the Tyrannoidea (with amendment) 04 39 Split Cory's Shearwater (Calonectris diomedea) into two species 05 42 Split Puffinus boydi from Audubon’s Shearwater P. lherminieri 06 48 (a) Split extralimital Gracula indica from Hill Myna G. religiosa and (b) move G. religiosa from the main list to Appendix 1 07 51 Split Melozone occipitalis from White-eared Ground-Sparrow M. leucotis 08 61 Split White-collared Seedeater (Sporophila torqueola) into two species (with amendment) 09 72 Lump Taiga Bean-Goose Anser fabalis and Tundra Bean-Goose A. serrirostris 10 78 Recognize Mexican Duck Anas diazi as a species 11 87 Transfer Loxigilla portoricensis and L. violacea to Melopyrrha 12 90 Split Gray Nightjar Caprimulgus indicus into three species, recognizing (a) C. jotaka and (b) C. phalaena 13 93 Split Barn Owl (Tyto alba) into three species 14 99 Split LeConte’s Thrasher (Toxostoma lecontei) into two species 15 105 Revise generic assignments of New World “grassland” sparrows 1 2018-C-1 N&MA Classification Committee pp. 87-105 Adopt (a) a revised linear sequence and (b) a subfamily classification for the Accipitridae Background: Our current linear sequence of the Accipitridae, which places all the kites at the beginning, followed by the harpy and sea eagles, accipiters and harriers, buteonines, and finally the booted eagles, follows the revised Peters classification of the group (Stresemann and Amadon 1979).
    [Show full text]
  • Bird List E = Endemic EC = Endemic to Caribbean ELA= Endemic to Lesser Antilles ES = Endemic Subspecies NE = Near Endemic NES = Near Endemic Subspecies
    Lesser Antilles Prospective Bird List E = Endemic EC = Endemic to Caribbean ELA= Endemic to Lesser Antilles ES = Endemic Subspecies NE = Near Endemic NES = Near Endemic Subspecies West Indian Whistling Duck Dendrocygna arborea EC Black-bellied Whistling Duck Dendrocygna autumnalis Masked Duck Nomonyx dominicus Ring-necked Duck Aythya collaris Greater Scaup Aythya marila Lesser Scaup Aythya affinis Northern Shoveler Spatula clypeata Blue-winged Teal Spatula discors Green-winged Teal Spatula crecca American Wigeon Mareca americana White-cheeked Pintail Spatula bahamensis Northern Pintail Spatula acuta Pied-billed Grebe Podilymbus podiceps Least Grebe Tachybaptus dominicus Feral Rock Pigeon Columba livia Eurasian Collared Dove Streptopelia decaocto Scaly-naped Pigeon Patagioenas squamosa EC White-crowned Pigeon Patagioenas leucocephala Grenada Dove Leptotila wellsi E Bridled Quail-Dove Geotrygon mystacea EC Ruddy Quail-Dove Geotrygon montana Zenaida Dove Zenaida aurita EC Eared Dove Zenaida auriculata Common Ground Dove Columbina passerina Red-billed Tropicbird Phaethon aethereus mesonauta White-tailed Tropicbird Phaethon lepturus White-tailed Nightjar Hydropsalis cayennensis manati St.Lucia Nightjar Antrostomus (rufus) otiosus E Antillean Nighthawk Chordeiles gundlachii ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ WINGS ● 1643 N. Alvernon Way Ste. 109 ● Tucson ● AZ ● 85712 ● www.wingsbirds.com (866) 547 9868 Toll free US + Canada ● Tel (520) 320-9868 ● Fax (520) 320 9373 Lesser
    [Show full text]
  • Bird List Chapter 3 (For Corrections)
    Bird list Farmland birds across the world (CLM, 2010) adjudant greater Leptoptilos dubius adjudant lesser Leptoptilos javanicus amazon blue-fronted Amazona aestiva amazon orange-winged Amazona amazonica ani groove-billed Crotophaga sulcirostris antbird scaled Drymophila squamata antthrush rufous-capped Formicarius colma antwren black-capped Herpsilochmus pileatus avadavat red Amandava amandava avocet American Recurvirostra americana avocet pied Recurvirostra avocetta babbler slender-billed Turdoides longirostris bananaquit Coereba flaveola barbet crimson-fronted Megalaima rubricapillus bee-eater southern carmine Merops nubicoides bee-eater European Merops apiaster bird-of-paradise king Cicinnurus regius bird-of-paradise magnificent Cicinnurus magnificus bird-of-paradise Raggiana Paradisaea raggiana bittern American Botaurus lentiginosus bittern great Botaurus stellaris bittern little Ixobrychus minutus bittern pinnated Botarurus pinnatus blackbird Brewer’s Euphagus cyanocephalus blackbird chestnut-capped Chrysomus ruficapillus blackbird common Turdus merula blackbird red-winged Agelaius phoeniceus blackbird saffron-cowled Xanthopsar flavus blackbird tricoloured Agelaius tricolor blackbird white-browed Stumella superciliaris blackbird yellow-winged Agelasticus thilius black-cockatoo long-billed (Baudin’s) Calyptorhynchus baudinii bobolink Dolichonyx oryzivorus bobwhite Northern (bobwhite quail) Colinus virginianus brambling Fringilla montifringilla bristlebill lesser Bleda notatus brolga Grus rubicunda bulbul white-spectacled Pycnonotus
    [Show full text]
  • National Biodiversity Strategy and Action Plan (NBSAP) and Consists of Four (4) Chapters
    i EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report consists of two main components, the first of which provides background information to the development of the National Biodiversity Strategy and Action Plan (NBSAP) and consists of four (4) chapters. Chapter 1 presents an overview of the country while Chapter 2 expands on the status of the country with regard to overall biodiversity and looks at the biodiversity status, trends and threats. Chapter 3 provides an analysis of the implementation of the existing NBSAP (2002) and specifically identifies implementation gaps which have been used in developing the new NBSAP. Chapter 4 examines the progress made in implementing the 2020 Aichi Biodiversity Targets and identifies thirteen (13) priority targets for the country. These targets were identified through a stakeholder consultation process of workshops and focus group meetings. The second component of the report articulates the new revised NBSAP. The priority strategies for biodiversity conservation in Barbados to 2035 are aimed at improving the wellbeing of all Barbadians. These priority targets are as follows: TARGET 1: By 2030, at the latest, Barbadians are aware of the values of biodiversity and the steps they can take to conserve and use it sustainably. TARGET 2: By 2030, at the latest, the Barbados Government, businesses and stakeholders at all levels will have taken steps to achieve, or have implemented plans for sustainable production and consumption and have kept the impacts of use of natural resources well within safe ecological limits. TARGET 3: By 2035, the rate of loss of all of Barbados’ natural habitats, including forests, will be decreased. TARGET 4: By 2030, areas under agriculture, aquaculture and forestry are managed sustainably, ensuring conservation of biodiversity.
    [Show full text]