DOCSLIB.ORG

The Improvement of National Route R63 Sections 15 and 16 from Bhisho (Km 5.8) to the N6 Bridge Intersection (Km 1.0)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Improvement of National Route R63 Sections 15 and 16 from Bhisho (Km 5.8) to the N6 Bridge Intersection (Km 1.0) ARCHAEOLOGICAL SPECIALIST STUDY In terms of Section 38(8) of the NHRA for The Improvement Of National Route R63 Sections 15 And 16 From Bhisho (km 5.8) To The N6 Bridge Intersection (km 1.0) Prepared by In Association with Terreco April 2018 THE INDEPENDENT PERSON WHO COMPILED A SPECIALIST REPORT OR UNDERTOOK A SPECIALIST PROCESS I Karen van Ryneveld, as the appointed independent specialist hereby declare that I: • act/ed as the independent specialist in this application; • regard the information contained in this report as it relates to my specialist input/study to be true and correct, and • do not have and will not have any financial interest in the undertaking of the activity, other than remuneration for work performed in terms of the NEMA, the Environmental Impact Assessment Regulations, 2010 and any specific environmental management Act; • have and will not have no vested interest in the proposed activity proceeding; • have disclosed, to the applicant, EAP and competent authority, any material information that have or may have the potential to influence the decision of the competent authority or the objectivity of any report, plan or document required in terms of the NEMA, the Environmental Impact Assessment Regulations, 2010 and any specific environmental management Act; • am fully aware of and meet the responsibilities in terms of NEMA, the Environmental Impact Assessment Regulations, 2010 (specifically in terms of regulation 17 of GN No. R. 543) and any specific environmental management Act, and that failure to comply with these requirements may constitute and result in disqualification; • have ensured that information containing all relevant facts in respect of the specialist input/study was distributed or made available to interested and affected parties and the public and that participation by interested and affected parties was facilitated in such a manner that all interested and affected parties were provided with a reasonable opportunity to participate and to provide comments on the specialist input/study; • have ensured that the comments of all interested and affected parties on the specialist input/study were considered, recorded and submitted to the competent authority in respect of the application; • have ensured that the names of all interested and affected parties that participated in terms of the specialist input/study were recorded in the register of interested and affected parties who participated in the public participation process; • have provided the competent authority with access to all information at my disposal regarding the application, whether such information is favourable to the applicant or not; and • am aware that a false declaration is an offence in terms of regulation 71 of GN No. R. 543. Signature of the specialist CTS Heritage and ArchaeoMaps 2018-04-12 Date 2 CTS Heritage 34 Harries Street, Plumstead, Cape Town, 7800 Tel:​ (021) 0130131 ​Email:​ [email protected] ​Web:​ www.ctsheritage.com EXECUTIVE SUMMARY REPORT TITLE: Archaeological specialist study in terms of Section 38(8) of the NHRA for the improvement of National Route R63 Sections 15 And 16 from Bhisho (km 5.8) to the N6 Bridge intersection (km 1.0). DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: This application is for the improvement of National Route R63 Sections 15 and 16 from Bhisho (km 5.8) to the N6 Bridge intersection (km 1.0). The project covers the last 22.7 km of Section 15 of National Route R63 plus the first kilometre of Section 16, i.e. a total length of 23.7 km. This section consists of a single carriageway rural highway. The proposal is to upgrade the existing road using 10 borrow pit / quarry sites (to be established). SUMMARY OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESULTS: 1. Site R63-15-S1 – Colonial Period: Church – S32°41’57.4”; E27°32’52.1” 2. Site R63-15-S2 – Contemporary Period: Border Post – S32°43’07.3”; E27°30’42.5” 3. Site R63-15-S3 – Colonial Period: Farmstead Remains – S32°46’19.3”; E27°23’52.5” 4. Site R63-15-S4 – Later Iron Age: Cemetery – S32° 47’19.0”; E27°29’23.5” 5. Site R63-15-S5 – Contemporary Period: Structure Foundation Remains – S32°47’55.9”; E27°29’28.3” 6. Site R63-15-S6 – Colonial Period: Railway Platform Remains – S32°47’57.3”; E27°29’42.5” FULL RECOMMENDATIONS: It is recommended that the proposed improvement of the National Route R63 Sections 15 and 16 from Bhisho (km 5.8) to the N6 Bridge intersection (km 1.0), including the utilization of 10 borrow pit / quarry sites proceeds as applied for provided the developer comply with the below listed heritage recommendations: ● Road alignment – N6 bridge (S32°41’44.3”; E27°33’49.3”) to Bhisho (S32°50’38.8”; E27°26’19.1”) ➢ Site R63-15-S1 (S​ 32°41’57.4”; E27°32’52.1”) comprises a Colonial Period church, situated along the proposed road alignment. Formal conservation measures, including a permanent fence with access gate are in place. No additional conservation measures are required on behalf of the developer for development purposes. ➢ Site R63-15-S2 (S32°43’07.3”; E27°30’42.5”) comprises the remains of the former Ciskei – South African border post. Originally constructed in 1981, the site has been demolished 3 CTS Heritage 34 Harries Street, Plumstead, Cape Town, 7800 Tel:​ (021) 0130131 ​Email:​ [email protected] ​Web:​ www.ctsheritage.com to floor level. The site does not receive formal protection status for buildings under the NHRA 1999. Based on its demolished state it is inferred that the site holds little to no affectionate significance for the resident community in terms of South Africa’s political history. Removal of the demolished structure can proceed without the developer having to comply with additional heritage compliance requirements. It is recommended that the developer constructs a plinth with the wording ‘Border Post’ as close to the original locale of site to the road as permitted within road legislation and regulations and with cognizance to visibility and safe road usage. ➢ The developer need not comply with additional heritage compliance requirements prior to impact on culverts, drainage channels or any of the bridges affected. ● Borrow pits / Quarry sites ➢ The Site R63-15-S3 (S32°46’19.3”; E27°23’52.5”) situated in close proximity to Quarry 15 comprise Colonial Period farmstead remains including structure and infrastructural remains. No conservation measures are in place. It is recommended that conservation measures, either temporary or permanent, as will be most practical with reference to the duration of use of Quarry 15 be implemented prior to use of the quarry. ➢ Site R63-15-S4 (S32°47’19.0”; E27°29’23.5”) comprises an informal Later Iron Age cemetery, situated on route to Borrow Pit 16. No conservation measures are in place. It is recommended that the site be permanently fenced with an access gate prior to the start of construction, thereby ensuring that heritage conservation measures meet SAHRA / EC PHRA minimum standards for heritage site conservation. ➢ Site R63-15-S5 (S32°47’55.9”; E27°29’28.3”) comprises contemporary structure foundation remains associated with former use of Quarry 3. Foundation remains are not formally protected by the NHRA 1999. Impact thereon by development or proximity thereof to development does not trigger any heritage compliance requirements. ➢ Site R63-15-S6 (S​ 32°47’57.3”; E27°29’42.5”) ​constitutes the Colonial Period remains of a railway platform in the north-eastern corner of the proposed Quarry 3 site. The Site R63-15-S6 remains are formally protected by the NHRA 1999. The developer should apply for an EC PHRA Built Environment site destruction permit prior to any impact on the railway remains. Alternatively, an approximate 15m conservation barrier should be maintained around these features to ensure their conservation within the development framework. The heritage conservation area should be permanently fenced with an access gate and permanent signage be erected indicating the area as a ‘Heritage Site’. 4 CTS Heritage 34 Harries Street, Plumstead, Cape Town, 7800 Tel:​ (021) 0130131 ​Email:​ [email protected] ​Web:​ www.ctsheritage.com ➢ No additional heritage compliance requirements pertain to establishment of Quarry 17 (S32°42’01.2”; E27°32’30.9”), Borrow Pit 14 (S32°45’15.5”; E27°29’28.5”), Borrow Pit 13 (S32°45’37.6”; E27°29’16.3”), Borrow Pit 30 (S32°45’31.9”; E27°28’57.3”), Borrow Pit 7 (S32°46’24.9”; E27°27’27.2”), Borrow Pit 6 (S32°47’25.2”; E27°27’21.9”), Borrow Pit 16 (S32°47’38.4”; E27°29’15.0”) and Quarry 2 (S32°47’56.2”; E27°29’08.5”). 5 CTS Heritage 34 Harries Street, Plumstead, Cape Town, 7800 Tel:​ (021) 0130131 ​Email:​ [email protected] ​Web:​ www.ctsheritage.com CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION 7 1.1 Background Information on Project 7 1.2 Description of Property and Affected Environment 7 2. METHODOLOGY 8 2.1 Purpose of Archaeological Study 8 2.2 Summary of steps followed 8 3. HISTORY AND EVOLUTION OF THE SITE AND CONTEXT 8 4. IDENTIFICATION OF HERITAGE RESOURCES 11 4.1 Field Assessment 11 4.2 Archaeological Resources identified 15 4.3 Selected photographic record 18 5. ASSESSMENT OF THE IMPACT OF THE DEVELOPMENT 26 5.1 Assessment of impact to Archaeological Resources 26 5.2 Proposed development alternatives 26 6. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS 26 7. REFERENCES 29 APPENDICES 30 1. Specialist CVs 6 CTS Heritage 34 Harries Street, Plumstead, Cape Town, 7800 Tel:​ (021) 0130131 ​Email:​ [email protected] ​Web:​ www.ctsheritage.com 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 Background Information on Project This application is for the improvement of National Route R63 Sections 15 and 16 from Bhisho (km 5.8) to the N6 Bridge intersection (km 1.0).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Graaff-Reinet: Urban Design Plan August 2012 Contact Person
    Graaff-Reinet: Urban Design Plan August 2012 Contact Person: Hedwig Crooijmans-Allers The Matrix cc...Urban Designers and Architects 22 Lansdowne Place Richmond Hill Port Elizabeth Tel: 041 582 1073 email: [email protected] GRAAFF -REINET: URBAN DESIGN PLAN Contents Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................................................ 4 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................................................................ 6 1.1. General .............................................................................................................................................................. 6 1.2. Stakeholder and Public Participation Process ................................................................................................... 6 A: Traffic Study 2. Introduction ................................................................................................................................................................ 8 2.1. Background ....................................................................................................................................................... 8 2.2. Methodology ..................................................................................................................................................... 8 2.3. Study Area ........................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Mean Streets: Migration, Xenophobia and Informality in South Africa
    Mean Streets Migration, Xenophobia and Informality in South Africa Published by the Southern African Migration Programme (SAMP), the African Centre for Cities (ACC) and the International Development Research Centre (IDRC) Southern African Migration Programme, International Migration Research Centre Balsillie School of International Affairs, 67 Erb Street West, Waterloo, Ontario N2L 6C2, Canada African Centre for Cities, University of Cape Town, Environmental & Geographical Science Building, Upper Campus, Rondebosch, 7701, South Africa International Development Research Centre, 160 Kent St, Ottawa, Canada K1P 0B2 and Eaton Place, 3rd floor, United Nations Crescent, Gigiri, Nairobi, Kenya ISBN 978-1-920596-11-8 © SAMP 2015 First published 2015 Production, including editing, design and layout, by Bronwen Dachs Muller Cover by Michiel Botha Cover photograph by Alon Skuy/The Times. The photograph shows Soweto residents looting a migrant-owned shop in a January 2015 spate of attacks in South Africa Index by Ethné Clarke Printed by MegaDigital, Cape Town All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without prior permission from the publishers. Mean Streets Migration, Xenophobia and Informality in South Africa Edited by Jonathan Crush Abel Chikanda Caroline Skinner Acknowledgements The editors would like to acknowledge the financial and programming support of the Inter- national Development Research Centre (IDRC), which funded the research of the Growing Informal Cities Project and the Workshop on Urban Informality and Migrant Entrepre- neurship in Southern African Cities hosted by SAMP and the African Centre for Cities in Cape Town in February 2014. Many of the chapters in this volume were first presented at this workshop.
    [Show full text]
  • National Road N12 Section 6: Victoria West to Britstown
    STAATSKOERANT, 15 OKTOBER 2010 NO.33630 3 GOVERNMENT NOTICE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORT No. 904 15 October 2010 THE SOUTH AFRICAN NATIONAL ROADS AGENCY LIMITED Registration No: 98109584106 DECLARATION AMENDMENT OF NATIONAL ROAD N12 SECTION 6 AMENDMENT OF DECLARATION No. 631 OF 2005 By virtue of section 40(1)(b) of the South African National Roads Agency Limited and the National Roads Act, 1998 (Act NO.7 of 1998), I hereby amend Declaration No. 631 of 2005, by substituting the descriptive section of the route from Victoria West up to Britstown, with the subjoined sheets 1 to 27 of Plan No. P727/08. (National Road N12 Section 6: Victoria West - Britstown) VI ~/ o8 ~I ~ ~ ... ... CD +' +' f->< >< >< lli.S..E..I VICTORIA WEST / Ul ~ '-l Ul ;Ii; o o -// m y 250 »JJ z _-i ERF 2614 U1 iii,..:.. "- \D o lL. C\J a­ Q:: lL. _<n lLJ ~ Q:: OJ olLJ lL. m ~ Q:: Q) lLJ JJ N12/5 lL. ~ fj- Q:: ~ I\J a DECLARATION VICTORIA lLJ ... ... .... PLAN No. P745/09 +' a REM 550 +' :£ >< y -/7 0 >< WEST >< 25 Vel von stel die podreserwe voor von 'n gedeelte Z Die Suid Afrikoonse Nosionole Podogentskop 8eperk Die figuur getoon Sheet 1 of 27 a represents the rood reserve of 0 portion ~:~:~:~: ~ :~: ~:~:~:~:~:~ The figure shown w The South African Notional Roods Agency Limited ........... von Nosionole Roete Seksie 6 Plan w :.:-:-:-:.:.:-:.:-:-:.: N12 OJ of Notional Route Section P727108 w a D.O.9.A • U1 01 o II') g 01' ICTORIA0' z "­ o o (i: WEST \V II> ..... REM ERF 9~5 II') w ...
    [Show full text]
  • Murraysburg Tariffs 2021/22
    MURRAYSBURG TARIFFS 2021/22 MURRAYSBURG TARIFFS FROM 1 JULY 2021 1. SEWERAGE (VAT excluded) 1.1. Sewerage: Basically R63.74 p / m 1.2. Sewerage: sucking R63.74 per load Sewerage: sucking R127.42 per load (after hours) 1.3. Bucket system R51.95p/m (one removal per week) 1.4. Hostel: Split heads /household R63.74 per toilet p / m 1.5. Schools R101.28 per toilet p / m 1.6. Sewerage Blockages R71.23 + VAT included 1.7. New sewerage connection Actual cost + 10% (admin) 2. REFUSE REMOVAL (VAT excluded) 2.1. Household R74.14(0ne removal p / w) 2.2. Business R142.81 p / m (one removal p/w) 2.3. Hotel R142.81 p / m (one removal p/w) 3. 3.1. Split heads Hostel R142.81 p / m (one removal p / w) 3.2. Karoo Boschies R142.81 p / m (one removal p / w) 3 WATER (VAT excluded) 3.1 Basic R46.45 p / m 3.2 Consumption R5.50 per kilolitre (6 am free) 3.3 Prepaid meters R8.96 p /kl (6kl free) 3.4 Deposit: Credit meters R91.02 3.5 Re-connections R47.52 (VAT included) 3.6 New water connection Actual cost + 10% 3.7 Irrigation water 3.7.1 Township R50.75 p/hour or part of an hour 3.7.2 Arable land R5.22p/hour overflow water 3.7.3 Bowls club R44.63 p/hour or part of an hour 4. MISCELLANEOUS RATES 4.1 Garbage Removal / other Garden Refuse R94.46 p/load or part of load VAT included Construction waste R236.13 p/load or part of a Load VAT included 4.2 Bail Fees (VAT included) Small stock R38.00 p / unit p/m or part of month Large stock R75.00 p / unit p/m or part of month Feed: Small stock R30.00 p / unit p/m Feed: Large stock R59.00 p / unit p/m Transport R224.00 Occasionally
    [Show full text]
  • Buffalo City Municipal RISFSA
    DR07316 LEGEND BCM R749 Municipal Roads BCM R751 14 Ngco 3 RISFSA Class 1 nde R1 07 R Amahlathi D RISFSA Class 2 6 1 9 2 0 RISFSA Class 3 R R 35 D 2 M R0 0700 RISFSA Class 4 RISFSA Class 5 14 73 R0 Road Network D Private Roads DR 07 3 0 1 0 DR 3 7 0731 Municipal Boundary 0 1 0 R Mod M a ka R2 1 D R DR R 07 DR 31 0 0 a 2 73 2 15 h s 9 e 1 q 2 6 g R DR M n 073 od a 11 aka R M h 4 s e 1 q g R Mod n a ak Limits of Liability and Disclaimer of Warranty a k R3 M a 1 d 1 o The DRPW makes no warranty of any kind, R M ng M qesh a a R3 k a 0 expressed or implied, with regard to the data d 1 o R DR0731 2 M 1 M a oda 5 k ka R and shall not be held liable in any event for any 3 a 7 d D R R o 073 incidental or consequential damages in connection M M 1 odak 5 ta M a R8 ngqe with or arising out of the use of this data. The da sha R6 remains the sole property of the DRPW and may 0 DR 0 073 7 11 only be used for the purposes of a project with 0 0 R the prior written approval of the DRPW.
    [Show full text]
  • Blue Crane Route Local Municipality (Ec102)
    BLUE CRANE ROUTE LOCAL MUNICIPALITY (EC102) FINAL INTEGRATED DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW 2020-2021 TABLED TO COUNCIL 3 JUNE 2020 Final Integrated Development Plan Review 2020-2021 Page 1 ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS AFS Annual Financial Statement AIDS Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome ASGISA Accelerated and Shared Growth Initiative for South Africa BCRM Blue Crane Route Municipality CDA Cacadu Development Agency CGTA Cooperative Governance and Traditional Affairs CPEX Capital Expenditure DEDEA Department of Economic Development and Environmental Affairs DFA Development Facilitation Act DLG&TA Department of Local Government and Traditional Affairs DOH Department of Health DOT Department of Transport DRPW Department of Roads and Public Works DSRAC Department of Sport, Recreation, Arts and Culture DWA Department of Water ECDC Eastern Cape Development Corporation ESKOM Electricity Supply Commission FMG Finance Municipal Grant GAMAP Generally Accepted Municipal Accounting Policies GDS Growth and Development Summit GGP Gross Geographic Product GRAP General Recognized Accounting Practise HIV Human Immunodeficiency Virus HR Human Resource ICT Information & Communication Technology IDC Industrial Development Corporation IDEA Individuals with Disabilities Education Act IDP Integrated Development Plan Final Integrated Development Plan Review 2020-2021 Page 2 ITP Integrated Transport Plan JIPSA Joint Initiative on Priority Skills Acquisition KPA Key Performance Areas KPI Key Performance Indicators LED Local Economic Development LLF Local Labour Forum
    [Show full text]
  • BCMM Draft BEPP 18 March 2021
    DRAFT BUILT ENVIRONMENT PERFORMANCE PLAN 2021-22 20 MARCH 2021 ACRONYMS ACSA Airport Company South Africa ISDG Infrastructure Skills Development Grant AFS Annual Financial Statements IUDF Integrated Urban Development Framework AG Auditor General IWMP Integrated Waste Management Plan AMEU Association of Municipal Electricity Utilities IZ Integration Zone BCMDA Buffalo City Municipal Development Agency KWT King William’s Town BCMM Buffalo City Metropolitan Municipality LED Local Economic Development BEPM Built Environment Progression Model LSDF Local Spatial Development Framework BEPP Built Environment Performance Plan LVC Land Value Capture BEVC Built Environment Value Chain MDM Metro Development Model BKCOB Boarder Kei Chamber of Business MELD Mdantsane-East London Development CBD Central Business District MFMA Municipal Financial Management Act CBF City Budget Forum MGDS Metro Growth and Development Strategy CIDMS City Infrastructure Delivery Management System MRF Material Recovery Facility COGTA Department of Cooperative Governance and MSA Municipal Systems Act Traditional Affairs mSCOA Municipal Standard Chart of Accounts COVID-19 Corona Virus Disease 2019 MSDF Metropolitan Spatial Development Framework CID City Improvement District MTREF Medium Term Revenue and Expenditure Framework CIF Capital Investment Framework MTSF Medium-Term Strategic Framework CS Community Survey MUHF Mdantsane Urban Hub Framework CSIP Capacity Support Implementation Plan NDP National Development Plan CSP Cities Support Programme NDPG Neighbourhood Development
    [Show full text]
  • Travel Directions to Hogsback1
    Travel Directions to Hogsback1 From East London and King William's Town (on the N2 and R63): Follow the N2 from East London into King William's Town (approximately 65km) In King William's Town, turn left into Cathcart Street to follow the N2. Just outside King William's Town (after crossing the Buffalo River bridge and the Buffalo Stop fuel station, turn right onto the R63, signposted Alice. Travel West on the R63, towards Alice After approximately 60 km (4 km before Alice, after Fort Hare Farm but before the dairy farm) turn right onto the R345, signposted "Cathcart via Hogsback". Travel approximately 30 km to Hogsback. Warning: Your GPS Navigation system may recommend that you follow the R63 as far as Dimbaza and then turn off to Keiskammahoek and then to Hogsback. This is not recommended. From Port Elizabeth via Grahamstown (on the N2) and Fort Beaufort (on the R63 and R67): Follow the N1 until approximately 10km past Grahamstown and turn left onto the R67, signposted "Fort Beaufort". Follow the R67 through the Ecca Pass for approximately 80km. Near Fort Beaufort, at the T-junction with the R63 turn right towards Fort Beaufort. After approximately 1km, at the next T-junction, turn right into Fort Beaufort. (See the Warning below.) Travel East on the R63, through Fort Beaufort and through Alice towards King William's Town 4 km after Alice, turn left onto the R345, signposted "Cathcart via Hogsback". Travel approximately 30 km to Hogsback. Warning: Before you enter Fort Beaufort your GPS Navigation system may recommend that you turn left onto the R67 towards Queenstown as far as Seymour, and then travel directly to Hogsback via Mitchell’s Pass.
    [Show full text]
  • An Archaeological Desktop Study for the Proposed Karoo Renewable Energy Facility on a Site South of Victoria West, Northern and Western Cape Province
    AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL DESKTOP STUDY FOR THE PROPOSED KAROO RENEWABLE ENERGY FACILITY ON A SITE SOUTH OF VICTORIA WEST, NORTHERN AND WESTERN CAPE PROVINCE Prepared for: Savannah Environmental (Pty) Ltd Contact person: Mr Gerhard Cronje PO Box 148 Sunninghill 2157 Tel: (011) 234 6621 Fax: (086) 684 0547 Email: [email protected] Prepared by: Ms Celeste Booth and Ms Natasha Higgitt Department of Archaeology Albany Museum Somerset Street Grahamstown 6139 Tel: (046) 622 2312 Fax: (046) 622 2398 Email: [email protected] November 2010 1 CONTENTS SUMMARY 2. INTRODUCTION AND BRIEF 2. ARCHAEOLOGICAL BACKGROUND AND HERITAGE 3. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 9. APPENDIX A 10. MAP 1 12. MAP 2 13. 2 AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL DESKTOP STUDY FOR THE PROPOSED KAROO RENEWABLE ENERGY FACILITY ON A SITE SOUTH OF VICTORIA WEST, NORTHERN AND WESTERN CAPE PROVINCE SUMMARY The area for the proposed Karoo Renewable Energy Facility is situated approximately 34km south of the small Karoo town of Victoria West across the Western and Northern Cape border and falls within the Ubuntu and the Beaufort West Local Municipalities. The proposed 200km2 area for the development is nestled between the N12, N1 and R63 roads. The proposed area is both sparse and mountainous with no major rivers occurring within the immediate area. Little is known about the archaeology of the immediate area, mainly because no systematic research has been conducted within the proposed area for development. However, two relevant phase 1 archaeological impacts assessments (AIAs) have been conducted approximately 20km to the north-east of the proposed development along the N1 and north-east of the R63 on the Farm Skietkuil No.
    [Show full text]
  • The Self-Perception of Preparedness for Midwifery Practice of Final-Year Nursing Students at a University in the Western Cape, South
    UNIVERSITY OF THE WESTERN CAPE FACULTY OF COMMUNITY AND HEALTH SCIENCES SCHOOL OF NURSING THE SELF-PERCEPTION OF PREPAREDNESS FOR MIDWIFERY PRACTICE OF FINAL-YEAR NURSING STUDENTS AT A UNIVERSITY IN THE WESTERN CAPE, SOUTH AFRICA Student name: Tebogo Ramahlo Student number: 3777280 A mini thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree: Magister Curationis (Nursing Education) Supervisor: Professor P Mayers http://etd.uwc.ac.za/ ABSTRACT Background: Globally, nurses and midwives are the most important healthcare providers. In most countries, nurses and midwives are often the first point of contact to healthcare, and in many rural areas, they are the only point of contact for patients. Skilled midwives are essential for the care of pregnant women and the safe delivery of their infants. Midwives play an important role in promoting the health and wellbeing of women, newborns and their families. In South Africa, slow progress in reducing maternal mortality can be partially attributed to a lack of appropriately trained health professionals to render some basic maternal care services. Aim & objectives: The aim of this study was to investigate the self-perception of preparedness for midwifery practice of final-year nursing students at a university in the Western Cape, South Africa. The objectives of the study were to: identify midwifery skills final-year nursing students found challenging to perform independently, determine the level of confidence of final-year nursing students for managing patients in the maternity unit, determine the level of comfort/confidence of final-year nursing students in key practice skills performance, and collect baseline evidence of nursing students’ perceptions of self-preparedness to inform the higher education institution of gaps and needs identified by nursing students.
    [Show full text]
  • Integrated Transport Plan
    CACADU DISTRICT MUNICIPALITY INTEGRATED TRANSPORT PLAN 2007/08 to 2011/2012 (Review for 2011/12) June 2011 i CONTENTS Page 1. Introduction 1 1.1 Background 1 1.2 Institutional and Organisational Arrangements 1 1.3 Liaison and Communication Mechanisms 2 2. Transport Vision and Objectives 4 2.1 Transport Vision 4 2.2 Transport Goals and Objectives 4 2.3 Key Performance Indicators 5 3. Transport Register 3.1 Demographic, Socio-economic and Social Data 8 3.2 Rail Transport 10 3.3 Bus Transport 14 3.4 Minibus-Taxi Transport 18 3.5 Non Motorised Transport 30 3.6 Metered Taxi Transport 31 3.7 Scholar Transport 31 3.8 Institutional and Organisation Setup of the PuT Industry 33 3.9 Roads and Traffic 34 3.10 Freight 37 3.11 Hazardous Materials and Abnormal Loads 37 4. Spatial Development Framework 4.1 Introduction 38 4.2 Role of the Cacadu District Municipality 38 4.3 Contextual Situation 39 4.4 Spatial Development Framework 39 5. Operating Licence Strategy 5.1 Orientation 42 5.2 Analysis of the Public Transport System 42 5.3 Policy Framework for Eveluation of Route Operating Licences 42 5.4 Operating Licences Plan 45 5.5 Law Enforcement 50 5.6 Stakeholder Consultation 50 5.7 Implementation Proposals 50 5.8 Financial Implications 50 6. Transport Needs Assessment 6.1 Approach 51 6.2 Stakeholder Needs, Issues and Project Identification/Prioritisation 51 6.3 Analysis of Status Quo 52 Cacadu District Integrated Transport Plan 2011 to 2016 June 2011 ii 7. Summary of Local ITP’S 7.1 Camdeboo 55 7.2 Blue Crane Route 55 7.3 Ikwezi 55 7.4 Makana 56 7.5 Ndlambe 56 7.6 Sundays River Valley 56 7.7 Baviaans 57 7.8 Kouga 57 7.9 Koukamma 57 7.10 Summary of Local IDP Projects and Budgets 57 7.11 SANRAL Projects 62 7.12 DRPW Projects 62 8.
    [Show full text]
  • Blasting on the R63 Between Fort Beaufort and Alice on 21 April 2021
    TRAFFIC ADVISORY: Immediate Blasting on the R63 between Fort Beaufort and Alice Eastern Cape, 16 April 2021: The South African National Roads Agency (SANRAL) would like to notify travellers that blasting is scheduled to take place between Fort Beaufort and Alice on Wednesday, 21 April 2021. It is estimated the blast will take place between 14:00 and 17:00, approximately 5 km from Fort Beaufort when travelling towards Alice. The road will be closed during the blast. The duration of the closure will be kept to as short duration as possible. Motorists travelling southwards towards Alice and King Williams Town may consider using the following alternative routes: • From Queenstown follow the N6 to Cathcart, turn right on the R345 to Alice or continue on the N6 to Stutterheim and on exiting the town turn right onto R346 to King Williams Town. • From N10 junction with the R63 towards Fort Beaufort on R63, follow the R67 from Fort Beaufort to Grahamstown to join the N2 to King Williams Town. • From Whittlesea follow the R67 towards Seymour then turn left onto the R351 towards Cathcart on the N6 then turn right and continue on the N6 to Stutterheim, then turn right onto the R346 to King Williams Town. Motorists travelling northwards towards Queenstown and westwards towards N10 and/or Whittlesea may consider using of the following alternative routes: • From King Williams Town to Queenstown follow the R346 to Stutterheim, turn left on the N6 to Queenstown. • From Alice to Queenstown follow the R345 to Cathcart and turn left onto N6 to Queenstown.
    [Show full text]