DOCSLIB.ORG

River Restoration Centre 17 Annual Network Conference Abstracts 2016

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
River Restoration Centre 17 Annual Network Conference Abstracts 2016 River Restoration Centre th 17 Annual Network Conference Planning, delivery and evaluation of our rivers: challenges and choices 26th – 27th April 2016 – The Imperial Hotel, Blackpool Kindly sponsored by: Abstracts 2016 RIVER RESTORATION CENTRE 17TH ANNUAL NETWORK CONFERENCE Planning, delivery and evaluation of our rivers: challenges and choices 26th and 27th April 2016 – The Imperial Hotel, Blackpool PROGRAMME OF EVENTS DAY 1: - - - TUESDAY 26TH APRIL - - - REGISTRATION at Reception 9:00 90 mins NETWORKING & EARLY VIEWING POSTER SESSION in the Washington Suite Session 1 Lancastrian Suite River Restoration Centre introduction & welcome 10.30 15 mins Martin Janes (the River Restoration Centre) Restoring beavers to Devon: Nature’s wetland architects 10.45 15 mins Derek Gow (Derek Gow Consultancy) Working with natural processes to reduce flood risk and improve the 11.00 environment 15 mins Lydia Burgess-Gamble (The Environment Agency) 11.15 Discussion 10 mins Instream restoration in action 11:25 15 mins Jackie Webley (Scottish Natural Heritage) 11:40 River weirs – remove or retain? 15 mins Matthew Hemsworth (JBA Consulting) 11:55 Delivering river restoration in Scotland: the next 12 years 15 mins SEPA Delivery of river restoration as a mitigation to address WFD requirements 12:10 Sally German (ARUP) and David Holland (Salix) 15 mins 12:25 Discussion 15 mins 12:40 LUNCH 60 mins RIVER RESTORATION CENTRE 17TH ANNUAL NETWORK CONFERENCE Planning, delivery and evaluation of our rivers: challenges and choices 26th and 27th April 2016 – The Imperial Hotel, Blackpool Session 2 Lancastrian Suite Louis Suite Princess Suite Urban River Restoration Partnering With Nature Ecological Monitoring The restoration and regeneration of Working together to restore The Midlothian An ecohydrological approach to river Deptford Creek Esks restoration 13:40 15 mins Michael Forrester (London Borough of Clare Rodgers (Royal HaskoningDHV) and David Harper (Aquatic Ecosystem Services Lewisham) Tommy McDermott (River Forth Fisheries Ltd.) Trust & Trex Ecology) Planning river restoration the Dutch way Removing and restoration of rock armour, Biotopes as design for restoration and 13:55 Ian Dennis (Royal HaskoningDHV) croys, and cars units for monitoring success 15 mins Kenneth Macdougall (EnviroCentre Ltd.) Ahmed Al Zankana (University of Leicester) 14:10 Discussion. Discussion. Discussion. 10 mins RIVER RESTORATION CENTRE 17TH ANNUAL NETWORK CONFERENCE Planning, delivery and evaluation of our rivers: challenges and choices 26th and 27th April 2016 – The Imperial Hotel, Blackpool Session 2 – continued… Improving habitat linkages in heavily Working with wood on the Wensum Using Beetles to measure riparian modified urban areas with Floating Ian Morrisey (Atkins Ltd.) and Marc Huband habitat quality 14:20 15 mins Riverbanks (Atkins Ltd.) Jon Webb (Natural England) Galen Fulford (Biomatrix Water Solutions Ltd., Land & Water Services Ltd.) Public participation GIS for assessing Partnering with nature for sustainable river The Logie Burn: Results of three years 14:35 social values in urban rivers restoration of monitoring 15 mins Xavier Garcia (International University of Matthew Johnson (University of Nottingham) Stephen Addy (The James Hutton Catalonia) Institute) 14:50 Discussion. Discussion. Discussion. 10 mins POSTER SESSION in the Washington Suite 15:00 45 mins with tea and coffee RIVER RESTORATION CENTRE 17TH ANNUAL NETWORK CONFERENCE Planning, delivery and evaluation of our rivers: challenges and choices 26th and 27th April 2016 – The Imperial Hotel, Blackpool Session 3 Lancastrian Suite Louis Suite Princess Suite Addressing Multiple Objectives Beaver Reintroduction Understanding sediments Balancing flow – balancing opinion Restoring beavers to Devon: Achieving measures for heavily modified Jane Moon (Black & Veatch) Understanding their impacts water bodies using sediment 15:45 Mark Elliott (Devon Wildlife Trust) management 15 mins Katy Kemble (Jacobs) & Matthew Buckley (United Utilities) Conflict of interest in river restoration: a Quantifying the multiple benefits of Weir pools and hydropower: methods to 16:00 15 mins county council perspective beaver activity across catchment scales assess impacts Jessica Dippie (Buckinghamshire County Council) Richard Brazier (University of Exeter) Simon Palmer (APEM Ltd.) River restoration pitfalls and successes from Bringing beavers back: how will we Rapid biodiversity gains through concept to monitoring manage this species? naturalisation: process based success 16:15 15 mins Jenny Mant (Ricardo AEA) & Martin Janes (River Roisin Campbell-Parker (Royal Zoological stories Restoration Centre) Society of Scotland) George Heritage (AECOM) 16:30 Discussion. Discussion. Discussion. 15 mins 16:45 SHORT BREAK TO MOVE TO FINAL JOINT SESSION 10 mins RIVER RESTORATION CENTRE 17 TH ANNUAL NETWORK CONFERENCE Planning, delivery and evaluation of our rivers: Challenges and choices 26th and 27th April 2016 – The Imperial Hotel, Blackpool Session 4 Lancastrian Suite Keynote Address Positioning River Restoration for 2030: lessons from the past and challenges for the future 16:55 Geoff Petts (Vice Chancellor and President, University of 25 mins Westminster; President of the British Hydrological Society and Editor-in-Chief of River Research and Applications) 17:20 Discussion (Keynote and General) 20 mins Poster competition prizes, final announcements and close 17:40 15 mins Martin Janes (RRC) 17:55 END OF DAY 1 19:30 – PRE-DINNER DRINKS RECEPTION Washington Suite & 20:00 – UK RIVER PRIZE AWARDS DINNER Lancastrian Suite RIVER RESTORATION CENTRE 17 TH ANNUAL NETWORK CONFERENCE Planning, delivery and evaluation of our rivers: Challenges and choices 26th and 27th April 2016 – The Imperial Hotel, Blackpool DAY 2: - - - WEDNESDAY 27TH APRIL - - - Registration Opens at 8:30am Session 5 3 hours CHOICE OF SITE VISIT OR WORKSHOP 9:00 30 mins Workshop A: Workshop B: Natural Flood Management: Tools to Help How to Make the Most of Your Monitoring and Maximise Benefit and Reduce Risk Project Appraisal Workshop C: Workshop D: Demonstrating the Value of Ecosystem Services Building Technical River Restoration Capacity for Decision Making Site Visit: Workshop E: The Wyre Riparian Restoration Dealing with sediment in respect to Initiative in-channel structures 12:30 LUNCH 65 mins RIVER RESTORATION CENTRE 17TH ANNUAL NETWORK CONFERENCE Planning, delivery and evaluation of our rivers: Challenges and choices 26th and 27th April 2016 – The Imperial Hotel, Blackpool Session 6 Lancastrian Suite Louis Suite Princess Suite Barrier Removal Shaping Our Rivers Modelling: Tools and Techniques Provision of fish passage in The Worfe The importance of reference state and the Integrated dynamic analysis of modified Catchment assessment of potential for geomorphic channels: dealing with constraints in urban 13:35 15 mins Iain Stewart-Russon (APEM Limited) work areas Hamish Moir (Cbec eco-engineering LTD) Ian Bentley (AECOM) Innovative fish passage design on an A method for definining potential Habitat modelling: a useful design, East Lancs river locations for WFD and flood risk investigation and appraisal tool 13:50 15 mins Adam Walmsley (Ribble Rivers Trust) restoration in a large catchment Dave Mould (JBA Consulting) Katy Kemble (Jacobs) and Sera Roberts (Jacobs) Lessons learned at a Norfolk mill Balancing risk and reward: a call for a Hydraulic modelling requirements for river 14:05 Jonathan Whitmore (slightly) more cavalier approach to restoration: methods for minimizing (not 15 mins (JBA Consulting) restoration just flood) risk George Heritage (AECOM) Eric Gillies (Cbec eco-engineering Ltd) 14.20 Discussion. Discussion. Discussion. 15 mins 14.35 10 mins SHORT BREAK TO MOVE TO FINAL JOINT SESSION RIVER RESTORATION CENTRE 17 TH ANNUAL NETWORK CONFERENCE Planning, delivery and evaluation of our rivers: Challenges and choices 26th and 27th April 2016 – The Imperial Hotel, Blackpool Session 7 Lancastrian Suite Delivering Severn Trent Water’s fair share of the WFD 14:45 15 mins Mike Streetly (ESI) 15:00 How we achieved good ecological potential 15 mins Bella Davies (South East Rivers Trust) and Dave Webb (Environment Agency) 15:15 River restoration – Priorities for action 15 mins River Restoration Centre 15:30 Discussion and Close. 15 mins 15:45 END OF CONFERENCE REFRESHMENTS tea and coffee available Day 1: Tuesday 26th April Session 1: Lancastrian Suite RESTORING BEAVERS TO DEVON: NATURE’S WETLAND ARCHITECTS D. GOW1 Additional authors 2 3 4 R. CAMPBELL-PALMER , M. ELLIOT , G. SCHWAB 1 Derek Gow Consultancy, 2 Royal Zoological Society of Scotland, 3 Devon Wildlife Trust, 4 Bund Naturschutz in Bayern e.V Beavers were hunted as a valuable international commercial trade item across Europe and North America. It is generally presumed they became extinct in England in the 1100s but evidence from historical writings suggests small population may have been present at least into the 1600s. Beaver created landscapes across Europe provide habitats for a range of species including large herbivores, small mammals, birds, fish, amphibians and reptiles. Along with habitat creation, beavers and their activities provide a range of ecosystem services which are not only sustainable but free! Such dynamic systems naturally regulate water flow, trap nutrients and silt, retain water, purify water and alleviate flooding – the importance of which are now widely recognised e.g. Wetland Biodiversity Strategy for Britain. Many of these functions are being artificially imposed in river systems through
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Biology and Management of the River Dee
    THEBIOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT OFTHE RIVERDEE INSTITUTEofTERRESTRIAL ECOLOGY NATURALENVIRONMENT RESEARCH COUNCIL á Natural Environment Research Council INSTITUTE OF TERRESTRIAL ECOLOGY The biology and management of the River Dee Edited by DAVID JENKINS Banchory Research Station Hill of Brathens, Glassel BANCHORY Kincardineshire 2 Printed in Great Britain by The Lavenham Press Ltd, Lavenham, Suffolk NERC Copyright 1985 Published in 1985 by Institute of Terrestrial Ecology Administrative Headquarters Monks Wood Experimental Station Abbots Ripton HUNTINGDON PE17 2LS BRITISH LIBRARY CATALOGUING-IN-PUBLICATIONDATA The biology and management of the River Dee.—(ITE symposium, ISSN 0263-8614; no. 14) 1. Stream ecology—Scotland—Dee River 2. Dee, River (Grampian) I. Jenkins, D. (David), 1926– II. Institute of Terrestrial Ecology Ill. Series 574.526323'094124 OH141 ISBN 0 904282 88 0 COVER ILLUSTRATION River Dee west from Invercauld, with the high corries and plateau of 1196 m (3924 ft) Beinn a'Bhuird in the background marking the watershed boundary (Photograph N Picozzi) The centre pages illustrate part of Grampian Region showing the water shed of the River Dee. Acknowledgements All the papers were typed by Mrs L M Burnett and Mrs E J P Allen, ITE Banchory. Considerable help during the symposium was received from Dr N G Bayfield, Mr J W H Conroy and Mr A D Littlejohn. Mrs L M Burnett and Mrs J Jenkins helped with the organization of the symposium. Mrs J King checked all the references and Mrs P A Ward helped with the final editing and proof reading. The photographs were selected by Mr N Picozzi. The symposium was planned by a steering committee composed of Dr D Jenkins (ITE), Dr P S Maitland (ITE), Mr W M Shearer (DAES) and Mr J A Forster (NCC).
    [Show full text]
  • Cumulative Effective Stream Power and Bank Erosion on the Sacramento River, California, Usa1
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN WATER RESOURCES ASSOCIATION AUGUST AMERICAN WATER RESOURCES ASSOCIATION 2006 CUMULATIVE EFFECTIVE STREAM POWER AND BANK EROSION ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER, CALIFORNIA, USA1 Eric W. Larsen, Alexander K. Fremier, and Steven E. Greco2 ABSTRACT: Bank erosion along a river channel determines the INTRODUCTION pattern of channel migration. Lateral channel migration in large alluvial rivers creates new floodplain land that is essential for Natural rivers and their surrounding areas consti- riparian vegetation to get established. Migration also erodes tute some of the world’s most diverse, dynamic, and existing riparian, agricultural, and urban lands, sometimes complex terrestrial ecosystems (Naiman et al., 1993). damaging human infrastructure (e.g., scouring bridge founda- Land deposition on the inside bank of a curved river tions and endangering pumping facilities) in the process. channel is a process that creates opportunities for Understanding what controls the rate of bank erosion and asso- vegetation to colonize the riparian corridor (Hupp and ciated point bar deposition is necessary to manage large allu- Osterkamp, 1996; Mahoney and Rood, 1998). Point vial rivers effectively. In this study, bank erosion was bar deposition and outside bank erosion are tightly proportionally related to the magnitude of stream power. Linear coupled. These physical processes (which constitute regressions were used to correlate the cumulative stream channel migration) maintain ecosystem heterogeneity power, above a lower flow threshold, with rates of bank erosion in floodplains over space and time (Malanson, 1993). at 13 sites on the middle Sacramento River in California. Two Channel migration structures and sustains riparian forms of data were used: aerial photography and field data.
    [Show full text]
  • Defining the Moment of Erosion
    Earth Surface Processes and Landforms EarthDefining Surf. the Process. moment Landforms of erosion 30, 1597–1615 (2005) 1597 Published online in Wiley InterScience (www.interscience.wiley.com). DOI: 10.1002/esp.1234 Defining the moment of erosion: the principle of thermal consonance timing D. M. Lawler* School of Geography, Earth and Environmental Sciences, The University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK *Correspondence to: Abstract D. M. Lawler, School of Geography, Earth and Geomorphological process research demands quantitative information on erosion and deposi- Environmental Sciences, tion event timing and magnitude, in relation to fluctuations in the suspected driving forces. University of Birmingham, This paper establishes a new measurement principle – thermal consonance timing (TCT) Birmingham B15 2TT. – which delivers clearer, more continuous and quantitative information on erosion and E-mail: [email protected] deposition event magnitude, timing and frequency, to assist understanding of the controlling mechanisms. TCT is based on monitoring the switch from characteristically strong tempera- ture gradients in sediment, to weaker gradients in air or water, which reveals the moment of erosion. The paper (1) derives the TCT principle from soil micrometeorological theory; (2) illustrates initial concept operationalization for field and laboratory use; (3) presents experimental data for simple soil erosion simulations; and (4) discusses initial application of TCT and perifluvial micrometeorology principles in the delivery of timing solutions for two bank erosion events on the River Wharfe, UK, in relation to the hydrograph. River bank thermal regimes respond, as soil temperature and energy balance theory pre- dicts, with strong horizontal thermal gradients (often >>>1Kcm−−−1 over 6·8 cm).
    [Show full text]
  • Modification of Meander Migration by Bank Failures
    JournalofGeophysicalResearch: EarthSurface RESEARCH ARTICLE Modification of meander migration by bank failures 10.1002/2013JF002952 D. Motta1, E. J. Langendoen2,J.D.Abad3, and M. H. García1 Key Points: 1Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois, USA, • Cantilever failure impacts migration 2National Sedimentation Laboratory, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Oxford, Mississippi, through horizontal/vertical floodplain 3 material heterogeneity USA, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA • Planar failure in low-cohesion floodplain materials can affect meander evolution Abstract Meander migration and planform evolution depend on the resistance to erosion of the • Stratigraphy of the floodplain floodplain materials. To date, research to quantify meandering river adjustment has largely focused on materials can significantly affect meander evolution resistance to erosion properties that vary horizontally. This paper evaluates the combined effect of horizontal and vertical floodplain material heterogeneity on meander migration by simulating fluvial Correspondence to: erosion and cantilever and planar bank mass failure processes responsible for bank retreat. The impact of D. Motta, stream bank failures on meander migration is conceptualized in our RVR Meander model through a bank [email protected] armoring factor associated with the dynamics of slump blocks produced by cantilever and planar failures. Simulation periods smaller than the time to cutoff are considered, such that all planform complexity is Citation: caused by bank erosion processes and floodplain heterogeneity and not by cutoff dynamics. Cantilever Motta, D., E. J. Langendoen, J. D. Abad, failure continuously affects meander migration, because it is primarily controlled by the fluvial erosion at and M.
    [Show full text]
  • East Osage River Watershed Inventory and Assessment
    EAST OSAGE RIVER WATERSHED INVENTORY AND ASSESSMENT Prepared by Alex L. S. Schubert Missouri Department of Conservation West Central Region-Fisheries Division Clinton, MO November 30, 2001 Acknowledgments Thank you's are in order to numerous individuals who provided assistance on this document. Thanks to Mike Bayless and Tom Groshens for information gathering and the compilation of numerous tables, and to Ron Dent for his guidance on, and editing of early drafts of this document. Mike was also a tremendous help in getting me started and making final changes to this document. Thanks to Bill Turner for the guidance he provided throughout this process. Thanks to Mark Caldwell for assistance with ArcView GIS software, his assistance in the field, and his dedication to providing the best data and information possible in GIS format. Thanks to Del Lobb for extensive help throughout the draft process. Thanks also to Missouri Department of Conservation, Missouri Department of Natural Resources, Environmental Protection Agency, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, and U.S. Geological Survey personnel and to other contributors too numerous to mention. Executive Summary The East Osage River Basin is found in central Missouri in the Missouri counties of Osage, Maries, Cole, Pulaski, Miller, Camden, Morgan, Benton, and Hickory and encompasses 2,474.52 mi2. This basin has been divided into two 8-digit hydrologic units (HUCs) and fourteen 11-digit HUCs. Lake of the Ozarks was formed in 1931 in the western half of the East Osage River Basin. Geomorphology This basin lies within a dissected plateau known as the Salem Plateau and is represented by four of Missouri’s natural divisions.
    [Show full text]
  • Fluvial Geomorphic Assessment of the South River Watershed, MA
    Fluvial Geomorphic Assessment of the South River Watershed, MA Prepared for Franklin Regional Council of Governments Greenfield, MA South River Prepared by John Field Field Geology Services Farmington, ME February 2013 South River geomorphic assessment - February 2013 Page 2 of 108 Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................ 6 1.0 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................ 8 2.0 FLUVIAL GEOMORPHIC ASSESSMENT ............................................................... 8 2.1 Reach and segment delineation ................................................................................. 9 2.2 Review of existing studies ...................................................................................... 10 2.3 Watershed characterization ..................................................................................... 11 2.4 Historical aerial photographs and topographic maps .............................................. 12 2.5 Mapping of channel features ................................................................................... 13 2.5a Mill dams and impoundment sediments ............................................................ 14 2.5b Bar deposition ................................................................................................... 15 2.5c Bank erosion, mass wasting, and bank armoring ............................................. 15 2.5c Wood
    [Show full text]
  • River Bank Erosion and Sustainable Protection Strategies
    B-11 Fourth International Conference on Scour and Erosion 2008 RIVER BANK EROSION AND SUSTAINABLE PROTECTION STRATEGIES Md.. Shofiul Islam1 1 Scientific Officer, River Research Institute (RRI) (Faridpur 7800. Bangladesh) E-mail:[email protected] Bank erosion is the most common problem faced in river engineering practices in many countries, especially in Bangladesh and this has been recognized as an awful threat to the society. So control of erosion is very much important to save agricultural land, property and infrastructures like bridges, culverts, buildings etc. located alongside the rivers. Treatment of bank erosion is usually expensive and is not particularly susceptible to engineering analysis. Because diagnosis and prediction of bank erosion is often difficult as it may be caused by a number of factors operating separately or together. Engineers play a dominant role to design the optimum bank protection works, which sounds justified both technically and economically. In this paper the probable causes, mechanisms and methods of predictions of bank erosion and sustainable strategies of different bank protection measures with special attention to economic analysis are briefly discussed. Key Words : river bank erosion, sustainable strategies, bank protection works 1. INTRODUCTION Engineers play important roles for poverty alleviation in many ways, e.g. by designing, planning and implementing infrastructures. As the government fund is limited and there is always a shortage of money, there should have limitations in spending money for public investments because there may be more hospitals, schools, roads, bridges and so on. Fig.1 Typical Bank erosion along the Jamuna Right Bank Due to the geometric location flood is the recurring problem in Bangladesh, which causes serious devastation to the property and life alongside source of sediment deposited at the downstream the river.
    [Show full text]
  • Streambank Erosion: Advances in Monitoring, Modeling and Management
    water Editorial Streambank Erosion: Advances in Monitoring, Modeling and Management Celso F. Castro-Bolinaga * and Garey A. Fox Biological and Agricultural Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-919-515-6712 Received: 31 August 2018; Accepted: 26 September 2018; Published: 28 September 2018 Abstract: The special issue “Streambank Erosion: Monitoring, Modeling, and Management” presents recent progress and outlines new research directions through the compilation of 14 research articles that cover topics relevant to the monitoring, modeling, and management of this morphodynamic process. It contributes to our advancement and understanding of how monitoring campaigns can characterize the effect of external drivers, what the capabilities and limitations of numerical models are when predicting the response of the system, and what the effectiveness of different management practices is in order to prevent and mitigate streambank erosion and failure. The present editorial paper summarizes the main outcomes of the special issue, and further expands on some of the remaining challenges within the realm of monitoring, modeling, and managing streambank erosion and failure. First, it highlights the need to better understand the non-linear behavior of erosion rates with increasing applied boundary shear stress when predicting cohesive soil detachment, and accordingly, to adjust the computational procedures that are currently used to obtain erodibility parameters; and second, it emphasizes the need to incorporate process-based modeling of streambank erosion and failure in the design and assessment of stream restoration projects. Keywords: cohesive soil; fluvial erosion; erodibility parameters; jet erosion test; stabilization practices; stream restoration 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Gravel Bar Removal
    Practice Title Gravel Bar Removal Photo(s) Summary of Practice Gravel bars are natural components of some stream types. Gravel accumulates on the inside of stream meanders or mid-channel because the water velocity in that location is not sufficient to carry the sediment load delivered by the stream. Some locations are naturally subject to gravel deposition (such as where the slope of a tributary stream changes as its confluence with the large stream (e.g. Batavia Kill entering Schoharie Creek). If a new gravel bar forms, it may be due to an increase in the sediment that is washed into the stream or it may be due to a local reduction in the stream’s energy, and hence its ability to transport sediment. A gravel bar that is removed will almost always reform in the same place during the next high flow event. Removing a gravel bar may temporarily treat a symptom, but it doesn’t solve the problem and may cause bank erosion as the stream finds an alternate supply of sediment to replace what was removed. Impact on Stream and Floodplain Processes and Functions Point bars: Point bars that form on the inside edge of meander bends are classic examples of sediment in temporary storage between high flow events. These low, curved ridges of sand and gravel along the inner bank of a meandering stream are a natural and necessary part of the stream system. If a point bar is removed, the stream’s energy may cause it to erode gravel from the streambed or banks to replace the gravel in the bar.
    [Show full text]
  • Stream Bank Protection and Erosion Damage Mitigation Measures
    CHAPTER II STREAM BANK PROTECTION AND EROSION DAMAGE MITIGATION MEASURES Optimum erosion control and management of the flood plain should combine sound flood-control engineering with preservation and enhancement of the streams natural qualities. In order to insure the flood plain's utility, versatility, and compatibility with urban improvements, this manual has taken into account required flood conveyance, the safety of citizens and property, the visual impact of the land, and land uses to be derived from the area. CHECK DAM IN RAWHIDE PARK, FARMERS BRANCH, TEXAS All stream bank stability methods focus on the boundary between the water and its channel banks. Structural and non-structural methods can be employed to control erosion. Some methods will improve the channel's ability to withstand greater boundary shear stresses such as vegetation, gabions or other forms of channel armor, while others, such as detention basins, check dams, stilling basins and diversion channels, will reduce the boundary shear stress in critical areas altogether. Last, but not least, stream preservation techniques such as the establishment of buffer zones, setbacks II-1 and erosion hazard zones prior to land development can reduce and even eliminate the economic damage that stream bank erosion can cause along urban streams. Several design issues are common to many of the structural stream bank stabilization methods. In the selection and application of a particular erosion protection method, care must be taken to avoid merely transfering the erosion problem to another location. This requires the designer to not only understand the causes of stream bank erosion at the site in question, but to also take a comprehensive look at the entire stream reach, or even, basin.
    [Show full text]
  • A Hydrograph-Based Prediction of Meander Migration
    A HYDROGRAPH-BASED PREDICTION OF MEANDER MIGRATION A Dissertation by WEI WANG Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY May 2006 Major Subject: Civil Engineering A HYDROGRAPH-BASED PREDICTION OF MEANDER MIGRATION A Dissertation by WEI WANG Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Approved by: Chair of Committee, Jean-Louis Briaud Committee Members, Hamn-Ching Chen Kuang-An Chang Hongbin Zhan Head of Department, David Rosowsky May 2006 Major Subject: Civil Engineering iii ABSTRACT A Hydrograph-based Prediction of Meander Migration. (May 2006) Wei Wang, B.S., Tongji University, Shanghai, China; M.S., Tongji University, Shanghai, China Chair of Advisory Committee: Dr. Jean-Louis Briaud Meander migration is a process in which water flow erodes soil on one bank and deposits it on the opposite bank creating a gradual shift of the bank line over time. For bridges crossing such a river, the soil foundation of the abutments may be eroded away before the designed lifetime is reached. For highways parallel to and close to such a river, the whole road may be eaten away. This problem is costing millions of dollars to TxDOT in protection of affected bridges and highway embankments. This research is aimed at developing a methodology which will predict the possible migration of a meander considering the design life of bridges crossing it and highways parallel to it. The approaches we use are experimental tests, numerical simulation, modeling of migration, risk analysis, and development of a computer program.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rate of Bank Erosion of Meandering Rivers
    THE RATE OF BANK EROSION OF MEANDERING RIVERS HAMID KHORSANDI Lar consulting engineering, Tehran, Iran GH. ALI FAGHIRI Lar consulting engineering, Tehran, Iran ABDOLLAH ASADZADEH Lar consulting engineering, Tehran, Iran The river bank erosion process, due to the importance of its negative impact on river environment and floodplain, was studied along the 82 km. meandering reach of Aras River. The study indicated that, during 45 years, 57 segments of the River bank with a total length of over 39.5 km. have been exposed to erosion. The results indicated that the maximum of areal average erosion rate was 9.3 meter per year, while the areal average of maximum point erosion was 5.5 m/y and the overall mean was 0.9 m/y. The study concluded that, among the erosion factors, the near bank stress was the most pronounced one and its magnitude varied between 8 to 25 pascal. 1. Introduction The river bank erosion is one of the fluvial-geomorphologic processes with profound and continuous negative impact on river environment and its floodplain. The magnitude and extent of the impact depends on the erosion rates and its location with respect to human activities, capital investment and environmental condition. The destruction of riparian lands and its consequential damage to capital outlays plus sediment production and deposition at downstream reaches are some of the most pronounced impacts. Although the factors causing bank erosion are limited in numbers however amongst them 2 or 3 factors play the most effective roles. Hydraulic forces which result from current velocity and wave action are the most basic factors in river bank erosion.
    [Show full text]