DOCSLIB.ORG

Treveri Liberi Antea by H

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Treveri Liberi Antea by H TREVERI LIBERI ANTEA BY H.-J. VAN DAM In his Geography of Gaul Pliny calls the Treveri liberi antea (N.H. IV 106). Many historians, either or not using Pliny's description as a starting-point, have tried to fix the date of the Treveri's loss of privileges. The common interpretation is that the loss of libertas is in some way connected with the revolt of Florus and Sacrovir in A.D. 21. C. Jullian 1) seems to have been the first to explicitly state this view. He thought that "a la suite du cens de 14-16" tributes were imposed which are to be reckoned among the causes of the revolt. This thesis was developed by A. Grenier, who made use of an article by Tenney Frank 2) ; he combines, as Jullian had already done, the passage from Pliny with Suet. Tib. 49 : Plurimis etiam civitatibus et privatis veteres immunitates et ius metallorum ac vectigalia adempta (sc. a Tiberio), and with Tac. Ann. III 40, 4, where Florus and Sacrovir seditiously disserebant de continuatione tributoyum. Tiberius, he concludes, imposed a purportedly temporary tribute on the civitates liberae and foedeyatae (the passage from Suet.), at the be- ginning of his reign, in order to meet the demands of the German campaigns. This tribute, made necessary by the precarious financial situation, continued to be levied (continuatio tyibutoyum) after the campaigns had been stopped, which caused discontent; probably the old immunities were altogether rescinded after the rebellion of 21 3). G. W. Clarke, in a somewhat indecisive article, covers the 1) Histoire de la Gaule, IV (1913), 154-5. 2) T. Frank, The Financial Crisis of 33 A.D., AJP 56 (1935), 336-41 ; A. Grenier, Tibère et la Gaule, REL 14 (1936), 373-88 and in E.S.A.R. 111 (1937), 499-500; 514-8. 3) It should be noted, however, that Grenier quotes the passage from Pliny to illustrate the libertas of the Treveri at the time, and makes no explicit use of the phrase liberi antea. Nor is Christopherson's "most rea- sonable alternative" (see below) proposed as such by Grenier. 62 same ground, making much of a passage from Tacitus' Histories (IV 17, 4, already cited by Grenier), where Civilis states in 69 A.D. multos adhuc in Galliis vivere ante tributa genitos. This, he thinks, can only be true if the repeal of immunities, among others for the Treveri, followed on the revolt, and so Libeyi antea must mean "be- fore 21 A.D." 4). Finally, S. L. Dyson in his recent survey of native revolts, seems satisfied with the connection between the insurrec- tion of Florus and Sacrovir and the Treveri's loss of libertas 5). However, the prior opinion is that the Treveri lost their libeytas in consequence of their revolt in 29 B.C. (cf. Dio LI 20, 5 ; 2z,5), either in 29, or with the census of 27 B.C., as Lipsius already argued 6). The earlier date, viz. 29, has recently been advocated by A. J. Christopherson, who rightly criticizes Clarke's article, both for its inner contradictions and the irrelevancy of Histories IV 17, 4') : "Tiberius (was forced) to readjust the tax system either by revoking the tax immunities or by imposing a temporary tribute on all tribal states regardless of their privileges (with the latter alternative ap- pearing to be the most reasonable)". This suffices to explain Hist. IV 17, 4. It demonstrates that this tribute is not connected with a loss of libertas for the Treveri in 29 B.C. Christopherson is wrong, however, in asserting that Clarke is unaware of the theses of Frank and Grenier 8) ; it should also be noted that Christopherson agrees with Grenier on the explanation of continuatio tyibutorum, but dis- agrees fundamentally with Grenier's view that the Treveri lost their libertas after 21 B.C. While I concur with Christopherson that there is no reason to suggest a date for the repeal of tax immunities subsequent to and 4) G. W. Clarke, The Treveri and the Tribute in Tacitus, Historia 14 (1965), 335-41. Cf. Grenier, E.S.A.R., 500 and REL, 386 with n. 5. 5) S. L. Dyson, Native Revolt Patterns in the Roman Empire, in: H. Tem- porini and W. Haase, Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt, 11 3, 157. Cf. also F. B. Marsh, The Reign of the Emperor Tiberius (Cambridge 1939), 138-9 ; J. J. Hatt, Histoire de la Gaule romaine (Paris 1959), 123. 6) According to Clarke, op. cit., 337, n. 11. P. A. Brunt, The Revolt of Vindex and the Fall of Nero, Latomus 18 (1959), 551 n. i, merely remarks that the Treveri perhaps forfeited freedom for a revolt in 29 B.C. 7) A. J. Christopherson, Supplementary Note, Historia 18 (1968), 365-6. 8) Cf. Clarke, op. cit., 338 n. 17. .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 1 Gallo-Roman Relations Under the Early Empire by Ryan Walsh A
    Gallo-Roman Relations under the Early Empire By Ryan Walsh A thesis presented to the University of Waterloo in fulfillment of the thesis requirement for the degree of Master of Arts in Ancient Mediterranean Cultures Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, 2013 © Ryan Walsh 2013 1 Author's Declaration I hereby declare that I am the sole author of this thesis. This is a true copy of the thesis, including any required final revisions, as accepted by my examiners. I understand that my thesis may be made electronically available to the public. ii Abstract This paper examines the changing attitudes of Gallo-Romans from the time of Caesar's conquest in the 50s BCE to the start of Vespasian's reign in 70-71 CE and how Roman prejudice shaped those attitudes. I first examine the conflicted opinions of the Gauls in Caesar's time and how they eventually banded together against him but were defeated. Next, the activities of each Julio-Claudian emperor are examined to see how they impacted Gaul and what the Gallo-Roman response was. Throughout this period there is clear evidence of increased Romanisation amongst the Gauls and the prominence of the region is obvious in imperial policy. This changes with Nero's reign where Vindex's rebellion against the emperor highlights the prejudices still effecting Roman attitudes. This only becomes worse in the rebellion of Civilis the next year. After these revolts, the Gallo-Romans appear to retreat from imperial offices and stick to local affairs, likely as a direct response to Rome's rejection of them.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rhine: Germany's River, Not Germany's Boundary
    Source: E.M. Arndt, Deutschlands Fluss, aber nicht Deutschlands Gränze, English trl. UvA Talen / SPIN. the French was as bad as it was foolish. One would have The Rhine: Germany’s river, not Germany’s thought that ten years, indeed twenty years, of blindness and misfortune might have sent a little light into their dark minds boundary and brought the errants back into line, especially since the French had long ago overturned their own proof, but far from it. There are still many who behave, indeed who exhaust Ernst Moritz Arndt themselves in deductions and proofs, as if the Rhine as the border between France and Germany is something indispu- table and settled. So effective is constant repetition, and so little are most Germans – who pride themselves on their ‘The Rhine is France’s natural boundary’ is what Sully proved profundity in thought and speech – accustomed to thinking. 1600 and 1610; ‘the Rhine is France’s natural boundary,’ The empty echoing of foreign opinions, especially the proclaimed Richelieu in 1625 and 1635; ‘the Rhine is France’s echoing of French hocus-pocus and sophistries, has sadly natural boundary,’ declared Count d’Avaux in the 1640s at become too much of a fashion on this side of the Rhine, in Münster, in the holy places where Hermann the Cheruscan had the country where thoroughness and depth of thought is once made a dufferent typeof declaration to the Romans; ‘the supposed to reside. Given this state of affairs, especially this Rhine is France’s natural boundary,’ resounded from 1670 to sad state of German minds and hearts, I consider it not super- 1700 in Louvois’ and Colbert’s speeches in Louis XIV’s council fluous to present our ancient, magnificent and holy River of state, and the court poets Boileau and Racine sang it in the Rhine, what it was, is and will be, to the good German antechamber; ‘the Rhine is France’s natural boundary’ cried the people, who are confused by too many political prattlers and monsters on the Seine from 1790 to 1800.
    [Show full text]
  • Histoire Des Collections Numismatiques Et Des Institutions Vouées À La Numismatique
    25 Histoire des collections numismatiques et des institutions vouÉes À la numismatique Igor Van den Vonder and Guido Creemers tHe COINs AND MEDALs COLLECTION oF tHe GALLO-ROMAN MUSEUM IN TONGEREN (BELGIUM) the coin and medal collection of the Gallo-roman museum in tongeren is the former coin and medal cabinet (Munt- en Penningkabinet) of the Province of limburg. it is an important collection, comprising over 30,000 coins and exonumia. the collection reflects the coins produced and in circulation in the region from antiquity to the 19th century and is unique because many were excavated locally. When the coin and medal cabinet was established in 1985, the province’s own collection consisted of the collections belonging to the royal limburg Historical and antiquarian society (Koninklijk Limburgs Geschied- en Oud- heidkundig Genootschap) and the barons Philippe de schaetzen and armand de schaetzen de schaetzenhoff. these form the core of the collection, to- gether with the collection of the former small seminary of sint-truiden, on loan from the diocese of Hasselt. With the acquisition of several private collections, the coin and medal cabinet achieved its target of 10,000 items. an active collecting policy was implemented and the collection soon doubled in size, largely thanks to gifts. Furthermore, Belgium’s royal court made over Prince charles’ personal collection to the coin and medal cabinet as a long-term loan. systematic efforts were also made to acquire the coin hoards found in the region. at the end of the last century the Province of limburg decided to fully integrate the coin and medal cabinet into the archaeological collection of the Gallo-roman museum.
    [Show full text]
  • “Celtic” Oppida
    “Celtic” Oppida John Collis (Respondent: Greg Woolf) I will start by stating that I do not believe the sites our discussion. So, what sorts of archaeological feat­ which I am defiling with qualify as “city-states”; ures might we expect for our “city” and “tribal” indeed, in the past I have drawn a contrast between the states? city-states of the Mediterranean littoral and the inland The area with which I am dealing lies mainly “tribal states” of central and northern Gaul. However, within central and northern France, Switzerland, and their inclusion within the ambit of this symposium is Germany west of the Rhine (Collis [1984a-b], [1995a- useful for two reasons. Firstly, if a class of “city-state” bl). This is the area conquered by Julius Caesar in is to be defined, it is necessary to define the character­ 58-51 B.C.. In his Commentaries he refers on istics with reference to what is, or is not, shared with numerous occasions to “oppida”, sites often of urban similar types of simple state or quasi-state formations. character, and apparently all with some form of Secondly, the written documentary sources are some­ defences. Some of the sites he mentions are readily what thin, or even non-existent, for these sites; there­ recognisable as predecessors to Roman and modern fore archaeology must produce much of the data for towns (Fig. 1) - Vesontio (Besançon), Lutetia (Paris), Fig. 1. Sites mentioned by Caesar in the De Bello Galileo. 230 John Collis Durocortorum (Reims), and Avaricum (Bourges) - large size with the Gallic and central European sites while others have been deserted, or failed to develop - (Ulaca is about 80ha).
    [Show full text]
  • Changing Views on Roman Funerary Rites
    Changing Views on Roman Funerary Rites A study of the transition to the inhumation burial ritual in the region of Tongres, Cologne, and Trier in the imperial period The image on the cover depicts the variability in funerary rites at a part of the Roman southwest cemetery of Tongres (after Vanvinckenroye 1984). Changing Views on Roman Funerary Rites A study of the transition to the inhumation burial ritual in the region of Tongres, Cologne, and Trier in the imperial period Author: Tom de Rijk (s1283049) Research Master Thesis (ARCH 1046WTY) Supervisor: Prof. dr. Theuws Specialization: The Transformation of The Roman World University of Leiden, Faculty of Archaeology Leiden (15-06-2018), final version 1 2 Table of Contents 1. Introduction 6 2. Historiography and Theory 14 2.1 Historicizing theory 14 2.2 Burial rituals 24 2.3 Theory on personhood 29 3. Methodology 32 3.1 The research approach 32 3.1.1 Local origins 34 3.1.2 Eastern origins 34 3.1.3 Complex origins 35 3.2 The overview maps 36 3.2.1 The overview maps 37 4. Results 42 4.1 Tongres 42 4.1.1 The south cemeteries of Tongres 42 4.1.2 The north cemeteries of Tongres 46 4.1.3 The tumuli from Tongres and its vicinity 47 4.1.4 Synthesis and discussion of Tongres’ developments in funerary rites 48 4.2 Cologne 51 4.2.1 The funerary archaeology from near Cologne 52 4.2.2 Monumental graves from Cologne’s region 53 4.2.3 The north cemeteries of Cologne 53 4.2.4 The south cemeteries of Cologne 55 4.2.5 Synthesis and discussion of Cologne’s developments in funerary rites 62 4.3 The other sites than Cologne and Tongres from the research area 68 4.3.1 Trier 68 3 4.3.2 Andernach 72 4.3.3 Other sites from the research area 74 5.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Central Gaul. Bituriges Cubi Circa 200-0 BC. Quinarius AR 15 Mm, 1,91 G Stylized Head Left / Horse Prancing Left, Sword Above
    1 Central Gaul. Bituriges Cubi circa 200-0 BC. Quinarius AR 15 mm, 1,91 g Stylized head left / Horse prancing left, sword above. very fine Cf. CCCBM II S412 (pentagram below). Starting price: 50 EUR 2 Central Gaul. Bituriges Cubi circa 200-0 BC. Quinarius AR 17 mm, 1,94 g Laureate head left / Horse leaping left, dagger above, CA-MBOTR-E below. very fine Colbert de Beaulieu, “Notules de numismatique,” Ogam VIII (1956), 421–424; BMC Celtic 511–513; De la Tour 4131. Starting price: 50 EUR 3 Central Europe. Treveri circa 100-30 BC. Potin AE 20 mm, 4,29 g Two goats around pellet; pellet-in-annulet above / Boar and wolf around pellet-in-annulet. very fine De la Tour 7465. Starting price: 50 EUR 4 Gaul. Andecavi circa 100-50 BC. Minim BI 10 mm, 0,38 g Celtic head facing / Boar. very fine D&T 2379. Starting price: 50 EUR 5 Gaul. Carnutes circa 100-50 BC. Bronze AE 15 mm, 3,17 g Male head right / Eagle facing, head right, wings spread; pentagram to upper left. nearly very fine D&T 2577. Starting price: 50 EUR 6 Gaul. Leuci circa 100-50 BC. Potin AE 17 mm, 2,97 g Helmeted head left / Stylized bull right; fleur-de-lis above. good very fine De la Tour 9155. Starting price: 50 EUR 7 Gaul. Lingones circa 100-30 BC. Potin AE 20 mm, 5,41 g Three horn-shaped ornaments revolving around pellet / Three s-shaped ornaments revolving around pellet. very fine De la Tour 8329.
    [Show full text]
  • MEN, WOMEN and ROMAN CULTURE AS REFLECTED in DRESS in the CITIES of the ROMAN NORTH-WEST Ursula Rothe Introductio
    WHOSE FASHION? MEN, WOMEN AND ROMAN CULTURE AS REFLECTED IN DRESS IN THE CITIES OF THE ROMAN NORTH-WEST Ursula Rothe Introduction Portrait gravestones from the Roman provinces, when we are lucky enough for them to have survived in any quality or quantity, shine a spotlight on the people they represent, their achievements, their aspirations, their identity. Part of these monuments’ message was the dress chosen by the various family members for their portrait depictions. Given their very public nature, lining, as they did, the roads out of towns, and the fact that they were often planned well in advance, we may assume that the dress was chosen carefully and as such gives us a unique insight into how these people wanted to be seen. Consequently, any information such images impart as to the cultural outlook of the people depicted is particularly valuable. The funerary art of Rome’s northern and north-western provinces reveals a complex variety in the dress choices made not only by speci c communities and societal groups, but also by families and individual people. A recurring pattern in all of the Roman provinces is a marked diference in the dress of the men and women of a particular area. This, however, is far from straightforward in its interpretation. Using as case studies two urban settlements in the northern provinces with very similar characteristics, Orolaunum in Gallia Belgica and Flavia Solva in Noricum, this paper will demonstrate how varied the dress situation in diferent locations could be, and will argue that although individual taste and cultural orientation were important factors in dress behaviour, the gendered dimension also tells us a great deal about the diferent roles men and women played within their local cultural systems.
    [Show full text]
  • A Genetic Signal of Central European Celtic Ancestry: Preliminary Research Concerning Y-Chromosomal Marker S28 (Part 2)
    A Genetic Signal of Central European Celtic Ancestry: Preliminary Research Concerning Y-Chromosomal Marker S28 (Part 2) Hallstatt Culture: 720 to 600 BC and 600 BC to 480 BC (Ha C and D) This interval represents a time of major changes in Europe, in the regions once characterized by the Pfyn and related cultures with roots extending back to the Neolithic, and the Urnfield groups which would morph into the peoples of the Hallstatt tradition with their characteristic elite burials. Artist rendition of typical rich Hallstatt inhumation burials Kristiansen (1998) proposes that the movement of Hallstatt C warrior elite spread across Central and Western Europe, at a time when trade routes to the north diminished. However those in the eastern tier maintained links to the Lusatian culture and the Baltic regions, with a continued emphasis on trade in amber and mining of salt in the immediate surrounds of Hallstatt in Austria. Hallstatt is actually at the southeastern tip of what was a very large oval shaped territory with the center of gravity northwest of the Alps. In Reinecke’s system of dating, this period is known as Hallstatt C and D. Hallstatt C (earliest phase) is characterized by rich horse and wagon burials (containing ornate horse tack) and includes the region from western Hungary to the Upper Danube. Hallstatt D is represented by a chiefdom zone and elite burials further to the west, with settlements concentrated near the headwaters of every major river from the Loire, to the Seine, Rhone, Rhine and Danube. The geographical re-alignment was likely a function of the establishment of a Greek (Phoecian) trading center in Massilia (Marseilles), circa 600 BC.
    [Show full text]
  • Were Used by the Romans and in What Contexts Frisii and Frisiavones Used Their Own Ethnic Names
    FRISII AND FRISIAVONES M.C. GALESTIN University of Groningen, Groningen Institute of Archaeology, Groningen, the Netherlands ABSTRACT: A study was made of the literary and epigraphical evidence referring to Frisii or Frisiavones, with the aim of assessing their relations with the Romans. The similarity of their names makes it difficult to distinguish between the two tribes. It emerges that the Frisii and Frisiavones probably were not related and lived in different territories. Both groups had contacts with the Romans, who made their names part of recorded history. Both Frisii and Frisiavones served in the Roman army and received Roman citizenship afterwards. The Frisiavones made their appearance around the middle of the first century and towards the end of the first century they formed an ethnic unit which served in Britain during the 2nd and 3rd centuries. Frisii were active in the Roman army from their first encounter in 12 BC, but their name did not become linked to an ethnic unit until the 3rd century, when several Frisian units were deployed in forts along Hadrian’s Wall. The Frisiavones had become incorporated into the Roman Empire, while the Frisii remained outside. The Frisii adopted some Roman habits but largely retained their own cultural identity. Members of both groups were present in Rome, as equites singulares, where their ethnic names are found combined with Roman names in their epitaphs. Their relations with the Roman Empire also provided new identities for Frisii and Frisiavones. KEYWORDS: Frisii, Frisiavones, Roman army, Roman Empire, ethnic identity. 1. InTRODUCTION were used by the Romans and in what contexts Frisii and Frisiavones used their own ethnic names.
    [Show full text]
  • PLAYBOOK by Andrew Ruhnke and Volko Ruhnke
    COIN Series, Volume VI PLAYBOOK by Andrew Ruhnke and Volko Ruhnke TABLE OF CONTENTS Falling Sky Tutorial . 2 Credits . .. 45 Roles and Strategy . 18 Card List . 46 Non-Player Examples . 20 Countersheet Scan . 47 Design Notes . 26 Tribes and Forces . 48 Event Text and Notes . 32 © 2015 GMT Games, LLC • P .O . Box 1308, Hanford, CA 93232-1308 • www .GMTGames .com 2 Falling Sky — PLAYBOOK the Forces display; the Germans do not track Victory; 7 .0 .) Go ahead Falling Sky Tutorial and put four cylinders and those three markers on the Edge Track numbers as noted in that setup section . (If you have not punched First-time players should start here! out the counters, punch what you need as we go .) Welcome to the tutorial for Falling Sky . It will walk you through setup and some game play step by step, getting you going with the Next is the Senate and Legions Track, some red boxes at lower right core mechanics and demonstrating a few of the options available to of the board . We will account here for the attitude of the Senate in each faction . Our purpose here is merely to teach concepts, not to Rome toward Caesar, meaning toward the Roman venture in Gaul suggest optimal strategy—we will leave that to you! (6 .5) . As noted in the Setup, place the Senate marker at “Intrigue” (“Firm” side down) . If you would like to look up specific Rules of Play as we go, we provide the relevant reference numbers in parentheses . Now find the 12 Legions—red cubes—among the Roman forces pieces and move them to the Legions track .
    [Show full text]
  • Constructing Caesar: Julius Caesar’S Caesar and the Creation of the Myth of Caesar in History and Space
    CONSTRUCTING CAESAR: JULIUS CAESAR’S CAESAR AND THE CREATION OF THE MYTH OF CAESAR IN HISTORY AND SPACE DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Bradley G. Potter, M.A. * * * * * The Ohio State University 2004 Dissertation Committee: Approved by Professor Erik Gunderson, Adviser Professor Fritz Graf ______________________ Professor Ellen O’Gorman Advisor Department of Greek & Latin ABSTRACT Authors since antiquity have constructed the persona of Caesar to satisfy their views of Julius Caesar and his role in Roman history. I contend that Julius Caesar was the first to construct Caesar, and he did so through his commentaries, written in the third person to distance himself from the protagonist of his work, and through his building projects at Rome. Both the war commentaries and the building projects are performative in that they perform “Caesar,” for example the dramatically staged speeches in Bellum Gallicum 7 or the performance platform in front of the temple of Venus Genetrix in the Forum Iulium. Through the performing of Caesar, the texts construct Caesar. My reading aims to distinguish Julius Caesar as author from Caesar the protagonist and persona the texts work to construct. The narrative of Roman camps under siege in Bellum Gallicum 5 constructs Caesar as savior while pointing to problems of Republican oligarchic government, offering Caesar as the solution. Bellum Civile 1 then presents the savior Caesar to the Roman people as the alternative to the very oligarchy that threatens the libertas of the people.
    [Show full text]
  • Vergil & Caesar Name of Assignment
    Course Number (when applicable) Course Title AP Latin - Vergil & Caesar Name of Assignment (title of book(s), Author, Edition, and ISBN (when applicable) The Gallic War: Seven Commentaries (English), Carolyn Hammond ISBN 10: 199540268 Expectations/Instructions for Student When Completing Assignment Read the English of Caesar’s Gallic War Books 1, 6, and 7 (summaries of books 2-5 provided) and answer the ​ ​ questions in the attached reading packet (pdf). It might be helpful to answer the reading questions as you read through the text. reading questions (pdf) One Essential Question for Assignment What should we expect from comentarii in form and content - how does Caesar confirm and challenge these ​ ​ expectations? What point of view does Caesar take when describing actions? One Enduring Understanding for Assignment Caesar adapts the characters, structures, and tropes of historical prose to create a uniquely Roman commentary and define basic tenets of ‘Romanness’, as well as structure of Latin literature and language Parent Role and Expectations Students work independently. Estimated Time Requirement Approximately 1 week per English Book Questions for the English Reading of Julius Caesar’s Gallic Wars Answer questions in complete sentences. Book I 1. Outline each of the following territories in the colors indicated: Belgae (blue); Celts/ Gauls (yellow), Aquitani (red): Figure 1: The Roman Provinces in Gaul around 58 BC; note that the coastline shown here is the modern one, different from the ancient coastline in some parts of the English Channel 2. Who was Orgetorix and what were his ambitions? 3. Why did Orgetotix commit suicide? 4. What actions or preparations did the Helvetii make before leaving their homeland? 5.
    [Show full text]