Seanad Éireann

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Seanad Éireann Vol. 225 Tuesday, No. 2 16 July 2013 DÍOSPÓIREACHTAÍ PARLAIMINTE PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES SEANAD ÉIREANN TUAIRISC OIFIGIÚIL—Neamhcheartaithe (OFFICIAL REPORT—Unrevised) Business of Seanad 80 Personal Explanation by Member 80 Order of Business 81 Proposed EU Directive on Freedom, Security and Justice: Referral to Committee 95 Protection of Life During Pregnancy Bill 2013: Second Stage (Resumed) 95 Land and Conveyancing Law Reform Bill 2013: Report Stage 167 Land and Conveyencing Law Reform Bill 2013: Fifth Stage 189 Prison Development (Confirmation of Resolutions) Bill 2013: Second Stage 191 Prison Development (Confirmation of Resolutions) Bill 2013: Committee and Remaining Stages 205 Adjournment Matters ��������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������205 16/07/2013PPP00150Noxious Weeds 205 16/07/2013PPP00650Medical Card Eligibility 207 16/07/2013QQQ01000Missing Persons 209 16/07/2013SSS00150Job Creation Issues 212 SEANAD ÉIREANN Dé Máirt, 16 Iúil 2013 Tuesday, 16 July 2013 Chuaigh an Cathaoirleach i gceannas ar 1030 am Machnamh agus Paidir. Reflection and Prayer. Business of Seanad 16/07/2013A00200An Cathaoirleach: I have received notice from Senator Paschal Mooney that, on the mo- tion for the Adjournment of the House today, he proposes to raise the following matter: The strategy, if any, the Government has to prevent the spread of Japanese knot weed along Irish roadways and if he will provide a policy which will oblige local authorities to address this matter I have also received notice from Senator Colm Burke of the following matter: The need for the Minister for Justice and Equality to put in place legislation in accor- dance with the proposals published in the Law Reform Commission’s Report on Civil Law Aspects of Missing Persons I have also received notice from Senator Lorraine Higgins of the following matter: The need for the Minister for Jobs, Enterprise and Innovation to set up a taskforce to enlist the support of all enterprise agencies to provide an employment focus in Portumna in view of the loss of many jobs and many small businesses in recent times I have also received notice from Senator Marie Moloney of the following matter: The need for the Minister for Health to clarify why a medical card has been withdrawn from a terminally-ill cancer patient (details supplied) in County Kerry I regard the matters raised by the Senators as suitable for discussion on the Adjournment and they will be taken at the conclusion of business Personal Explanation by Member 80 16 July 2013 16/07/2013A00400An Cathaoirleach: Before I call the Leader of the House, Senator Norris wishes to make a personal explanation to the House Before calling the Senator I want to make it clear that I will not allow any debate on this matter Once the personal explanation is made, the matter will be closed 16/07/2013A00500Senator David Norris: I thank the Cathaoirleach I would like to explain what happened yesterday, put it in context and withdraw some of the words that gave offence I was simply furious, having just possessed a copy of this mendacious document in which those of us who over the past 30 years have campaigned for Seanad reform were smeared in the nastiest way This will be a very dirty campaign and it comes from the top I was incandescent with rage I accept that my language was intemperate Had I been called for an explanation at the time I would have given one I do not intend to go into a lengthy, linguistic explanation and try to defend what I said, which I could do if it was an academic discussion I regret any offence but what I regret most is that this will be used in this dirty campaign as a diversion 16/07/2013A00600An Cathaoirleach: Senator, under Standing Order 33, which allows you to make the ex- planation, you have to be brief 16/07/2013A00700Senator David Norris: I will finish by saying that it was stated on the radio by the Min- ister for Public Expenditure and Reform, Deputy Howlin, that there was personal antagonism between myself and Deputy Doherty That is untrue I spoke to her last week and I sympathi- sed with her on the horrible attacks about the abortion Bill, and I put that on the record of this House There is no disagreement There is nothing but friendship I did not prepare anything 16/07/2013A01000An Cathaoirleach: Senator, I ask you to stick to the matter 16/07/2013A01300Senator David Norris: I did it off the top of my head and I am very happy to withdraw the comment and to say that this is a very valuable document because it shows a smoking gun in that the Taoiseach, Deputy Enda Kenny, was prepared to parachute people in who had failed in the Dáil election That is a serious issue, not intemperate language from me, which I am happy to withdraw Order of Business 16/07/2013A01500Senator Maurice Cummins: The Order of Business is No 1, motion re the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the fight against fraud to the Union’s financial interests by means of criminal law and a motion re the Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation and Training (Europol), to be taken on the conclusion of the Order of Business without debate; No 2, the Protection of Life During Pregnancy Bill 2013 - Second Stage (Re- sumed), to be taken on the conclusion of No 1 and to be adjourned not later than 345 pm, if not previously concluded, with the contributions of all Senators not to exceed ten minutes and the Minister to be called on to reply not later than 335 pm; No 3, Land and Conveyancing Law Reform Bill 2013 - Report Stage, to be taken at 4 pm and to conclude no later than 6 pm; No. 4, Prison Development (Confirmation of Resolutions) Bill 2013 - All Stages, to be taken at 6 pm, with the Second Stage contribution of group Senators not to exceed eight minutes and those of all other Senators not to exceed five minutes, and Committee and Remaining Stages to be taken immediately thereafter 81 Seanad Éireann 16/07/2013B00200An Cathaoirleach: Will the Leader clarify the arrangements for No 2? He states it is to adjourn not later than 345 pm, with the Minister to be called at 335 pm Must the Minister be called upon at 335 pm? 16/07/2013B00300Senator Maurice Cummins: No later He is to reply no later than 335 pm 16/07/2013B00400An Cathaoirleach: Is the debate to conclude then? 16/07/2013B00500Senator Maurice Cummins: If it is concluded I am expecting that Second Stage will be concluded before the time 16/07/2013B00600An Cathaoirleach: Must the Minister be called at 335 pm? 16/07/2013B00700Senator Maurice Cummins: Can I leave out that reference? I do not want to guillotine this Bill in any way The reason I am including a time for the Minister to reply is that the debate may have concluded at that time I will not conclude the debate until all Members have had their say on it I suggest that the debate be adjourned at 345 pm if not previously concluded 16/07/2013B00800Senator Marc MacSharry: I thank the Leader for ensuring that everyone will have their say We will not call a vote on the Order of Business today on the basis that many Members are waiting to speak and in order to deal with our business as quickly as possible I wish to raise a few issues Certain publications this morning claim a HSE overrun of some €25 million and that the target for cuts will be the mental health services area and the money set aside for suicide prevention and so on We produced a document entitled Actions Speak Louder Than Words, which was welcomed by all involved in suicide prevention and even by the Minister of State at the Department of Health, Deputy Kathleen Lynch Sadly, very few recommendations in the document have been implemented thus far Now a front-page report states that the funding in place for this year for the employment of community health officers and those involved in suicide prevention will only be made contingent on savings The level of prioritisation being given to this area is not sufficient, frankly. Close to 600 people are un- der threat of dying in the year ahead as a direct result of suicide It should not be the case that funding for suicide prevention is contingent on savings If it were known that two planes were about to crash on a particular day at a particular time, we would do everything possible to pre- vent it from happening. Senator Gilroy, Senator White and many others have made significant contributions to the debate on this subject. It must not be the first thing to be put on the block when there are overruns Yesterday, FLAC and others warned that the mortgage arrears crisis is worsening and very little is being done The response of the Minister for Finance, Deputy Noonan, which the Leader read to the House yesterday, is an abdication of responsibility by the Minister of the day The people depend on their representatives and on the Government; they depend on the Houses of the Oireachtas to represent them. On the biggest financial crisis facing families throughout
Recommended publications
  • Submission to the Citizens' Assembly
    Submission to the Citizens’ Assembly SUBMISSION TO THE CITIZENS’ ASSEMBLY TABLE OF CONTENTS The Abortion Rights Campaign 4 Introduction 5 Repealing the 8th Amendment 6 Why we should repeal the 8th 7 The reality of abortion in Ireland 9 The reality of the 8th Amendment in Ireland 12 International Condemnation 13 Free, Safe, Legal 15 Why we need free, safe, legal abortion access 16 Availability in the public health system 17 Abortion on request 18 Gestational limits 19 Decriminalisation 21 Conscientious objection 23 Conclusion 26 Let women choose 27 Abortion Stories 28 3 THE ABORTION RIGHTS CAMPAIGN The Abortion Rights Campaign (ARC) is a grassroots movement for choice and change in Ireland. We organise the annual March for Choice, which this year saw 20,000 people take to the streets of Dublin to demand a change to Ireland’s abortion laws. We aim to promote broad national support for a referendum to repeal the 8th Amendment and the introduction of free, safe and legal abortion access in the State. We believe women can be trusted to choose, and we aim to ensure the health and rights of women in Ireland are protected in line with international best practice and human rights standards. We welcome the opportunity to make a submission to the Citizens’ Assembly during its consideration of the 8th Amendment to the Constitution. 4 INTRODUCTION As the largest grassroots pro-choice organisation in Ireland, we represent those people directly affected by the 8th Amendment. We represent the 12 women each day who leave Irish shores to access standard medical care.
    [Show full text]
  • Irish Constitutional Law
    1 ERASMUS SUMMER SCHOOL MADRID 2011 IRISH CONSTITUTIONAL LAW Martin Kearns Barrister at Law Historical Introduction The Treaty of December 6, 1921 was the foundation stone of an independent Ireland under the terms of which the Irish Free State was granted the status of a self-governing dominion, like Australia, Canada, New Zealand and South Africa. Although the Constitution of the Ireland ushered in virtually total independence in the eyes of many it had been imposed by Britain through the Anglo Irish Treaty. 1 The Irish Constitution of 1922 was the first new Constitution following independence from Britain but by 1936 it had been purged of controversial symbols and external associations by the Fianna Faíl Government which had come to power in 1932.2 The Constitution of Ireland replaced the Constitution of the Irish Free State which had been in effect since the independence of the Free State from the United Kingdom on 6 December 1922. The motivation of the new Constitution was mainly to put an Irish stamp on the Constitution of the Free State whose institutions Fianna Faíl had boycotted up to 1926. 1 Signed in London on 6 December 1921. 2 e.g. under Article 17 every member of the Oireachtas had to take an oath of allegiance, swearing true faith and allegiance to the Constitution and fidelity to the Monarch; the representative of the King known as the Governor General etc. 2 Bunreacht na hÉireann an overview The official text of the constitution consists of a Preamble and fifty articles arranged under sixteen headings. Its overall length is approximately 16,000 words.
    [Show full text]
  • Supreme Court Visit to NUI Galway 4-6 March, 2019 Welcoming the Supreme Court to NUI Galway
    Supreme Court Visit to NUI Galway 4-6 March, 2019 Welcoming the Supreme Court to NUI Galway 4-6 March, 2019 Table of Contents Welcome from the Head of School . 2 Te School of Law at NUI Galway . 4 Te Supreme Court of Ireland . 6 Te Judges of the Supreme Court . 8 2 Welcome from the Head of School We are greatly honoured to host the historic sittings of the Irish Supreme Court at NUI Galway this spring. Tis is the frst time that the Supreme Court will sit outside of a courthouse since the Four Courts reopened in 1932, the frst time the court sits in Galway, and only its third time to sit outside of Dublin. To mark the importance of this occasion, we are running a series of events on campus for the public and for our students. I would like to thank the Chief Justice and members of the Supreme Court for participating in these events and for giving their time so generously. Dr Charles O’Mahony, Head of School, NUI Galway We are particularly grateful for the Supreme Court’s willingness to engage with our students. As one of Ireland’s leading Law Schools, our key focus is on the development of both critical thinking and adaptability in our future legal professionals. Tis includes the ability to engage in depth with the new legal challenges arising from social change, and to analyse and apply the law to developing legal problems. Te Supreme Court’s participation in student seminars on a wide range of current legal issues is not only deeply exciting for our students, but ofers them an excellent opportunity to appreciate at frst hand the importance of rigorous legal analysis, and the balance between 3 necessary judicial creativity and maintaining the rule of law.
    [Show full text]
  • Seanad Éireann
    Vol. 234 Thursday, No. 5 25 September 2014 DÍOSPÓIREACHTAÍ PARLAIMINTE PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES SEANAD ÉIREANN TUAIRISC OIFIGIÚIL—Neamhcheartaithe (OFFICIAL REPORT—Unrevised) Insert Date Here 25/09/2014A00100Business of Seanad 294 25/09/2014B00100Order of Business 294 25/09/2014K00200Freedom of Information Bill 2013: Committee Stage 313 25/09/2014X00100Adjournment Matters ��������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������345 25/09/2014X00150Disability Support Services Provision 345 25/09/2014Y00950Nursing Homes Support Scheme Applications 347 25/09/2014Z00150Seanad Elections ���������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������349 SEANAD ÉIREANN Déardaoin, 25 Meán Fómhair 2014 Thursday, 25 September 2014 Chuaigh an Cathaoirleach i gceannas ar 1030 am Machnamh agus Paidir. Reflection and Prayer. 25/09/2014A00100Business of Seanad 25/09/2014A00200An Cathaoirleach: I have received notice from Senator Feargal Quinn that, on the motion for the Adjournment of the House today, he proposes to raise the following matter: The need for the Minister for the Environment, Community and Local Government to outline the position
    [Show full text]
  • 18-5924 Respondent BOM.Wpd
    No. 18-5924 In the Supreme Court of the United States __________________ EVANGELISTO RAMOS, Petitioner, v. LOUISIANA, Respondent. __________________ On Writ of Certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit __________________ BRIEF OF RESPONDENT __________________ JEFF LANDRY LEON A. CANNIZZARO. JR. Attorney General District Attorney, ELIZABETH B. MURRILL Parish of Orleans Solicitor General Donna Andrieu Counsel of Record Chief of Appeals MICHELLE GHETTI 619 S. White Street Deputy Solicitor General New Orleans, LA 70119 COLIN CLARK (504) 822-2414 Assistant Attorney General LOUISIANA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE WILLIAM S. CONSOVOY 1885 North Third Street JEFFREY M. HARRIS Baton Rouge, LA 70804 Consovoy McCarthy PLLC (225) 326-6766 1600 Wilson Blvd., Suite 700 [email protected] Arlington, VA 22209 Counsel for Respondent August 16, 2019 Becker Gallagher · Cincinnati, OH · Washington, D.C. · 800.890.5001 i QUESTION PRESENTED Whether this Court should overrule Apodaca v. Oregon, 406 U.S. 404 (1972), and hold that the Sixth Amendment, as incorporated through the Fourteenth Amendment, guarantees State criminal defendants the right to a unanimous jury verdict. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS QUESTION PRESENTED.................... i TABLE OF AUTHORITIES................... iv STATEMENT............................... 1 A.Factual Background..................1 B.Procedural History...................2 SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT.................. 4 ARGUMENT.............................. 11 I. THE SIXTH AMENDMENT’S JURY TRIAL CLAUSE DOES NOT REQUIRE UNANIMITY .......... 11 A. A “Trial By Jury” Under the Sixth Amendment Does Not Require Every Feature of the Common Law Jury......11 B. A Unanimous Verdict Is Not an Indispensable Component of a “Trial By Jury.”............................ 20 1. There is inadequate historical support for unanimity being indispensable to a jury trial......................
    [Show full text]
  • The Bulletin
    NUMBER 55 WINTER 2007 THE BULLETIN 56th ANNUAL MEETING A RESOUNDING SUCCESS First to London 9/14-17 then Dublin 9/17-20, 2006 F rom in Dublin, the spirited Republic of musical greeting Ireland. It has of a uniformed band become a tradition of welcoming them to stately the College periodically to Kensington Palace, the former home return to London, to the roots of of Diana, Princess of Wales, to an impromptu a the legal profession in the common law world, and capella rendition of Danny Boy by a Nobel Laureate to visit another country in Europe afterwards. at the end of the last evening in Dublin Castle, the 56th Annual Meeting of the American College of Trial The Board of Regents, including the past presidents, Lawyers in London and the follow-up conference in meeting in advance of the Fellows’ London meeting, Dublin were memorable events. had represented the United States at an evensong service at Westminster Abbey, commemorating the More than 1,200 Fellows and their spouses attended fifth anniversary of 9/11. After the service, President the London meeting, the fifth the College has held Michael A. Cooper laid a wreath on the memorial in that city and the first since 1998. And 510 of to The Innocent Victims, located in the courtyard them continued to the College’s first ever meeting outside the West Door of the Abbey. The Regents LONDON-DUBLIN, con’t on page 37 This Issue: 88 PAGES Profile: SYLVIA WALBOLT p. 17 NOTABLE QUOTE FROM the LONDON-DUBLIN MEETING ““Let us pray.
    [Show full text]
  • The Filtering of Appeals to the Supreme Courts
    NETWORK OF THE PRESIDENTS OF THE SUPREME JUDICIAL COURTS OF THE EUROPEAN UNION Dublin Conference November 26-27, 2015 Farmleigh House Farmleigh Castleknock, Dublin 15, Ireland INTRODUCTORY REPORT The Filtering of Appeals to the Supreme Courts Rimvydas Norkus President of the Supreme Court of Lithuania Colloquium organised with the support of the European Commission Colloque organisé avec le soutien de la Commission européenne I. Introduction. On the Nature of Appeal to Supreme Court Part VIII of the Constitution of 3rd May 1791 of the Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth, the first constitution of its type in Europe, stated that the judicial authority shall not be carried out either by the legislative authority or by the King, but by magistracies instituted and elected to that end. The Constitution also mentioned appellate courts and the Supreme Court. The Constitution did not address in any way filtering of appeals. However, even long before the Constitution of 1791 was adopted, the Third Statute of Grand Duchy of Lithuania, approved in 1588, forbid to appeal intermediate decisions of lower courts to the Supreme Tribunal of the Grand Duchy. Later laws of the Grand Duchy have even established a fine for not complying with this provision. Thus the necessity to limit a right of application to Supreme Court was understood and recognized by a legal system of Lithuania long ago. Historical sources and researches reveal to us now that one of the main reasons why this was done was in fact huge workload of a superior court and delay that was not uncommon in those times. It could take ten or more years to decide some cases before the Supreme Tribunal of the Grand Duchy.
    [Show full text]
  • Organisation Biographies
    Organisation Biographies The following groups presented to the Assembly on Sunday, 5 March. Each group was asked to provide a brief biography of their organisation and these are provided below. Session One Doctors for Life Ireland Doctors for Life Ireland is an organisation for doctors who wish to uphold the practice of medicine as a service to human life at all stages. It was started in 1992 and is open to medical practitioners of every specialty, both working and retired. It aims to provide evidence-based and factual information to doctors and others who are concerned about the ethical questions relating to patient care and practitioner responsibility at all stages of life. It is not affiliated to, or part of, any other organisation. It is entirely funded by supporters who come from a range of medical specialties including general practitioners, psychiatrists, occupational health physicians, obstetricians and others. Doctors for Choice We are a group of doctors practicing in Ireland who believe that women are best qualified to make decisions regarding their pregnancies, in their individual circumstances. Our group includes doctors who practice in different disciplines e.g. Psychiatry, Obstetrics and General Practice, and who, like all doctors practicing in Ireland, are faced with patients who have unwanted pregnancies and who are seeking access to safe abortion. We see first hand the harm to health experience by our patients due to the 8th amendment, and lack of clinical abortion services in Ireland. We wish to provide Irish women with comprehensive compassionate reproductive healthcare in Ireland, respecting the choices women and girls make regarding continuing, or ending their pregnancies through abortion, and do not believe that a woman should be forced to complete a pregnancy against her wishes.
    [Show full text]
  • News 24Th Seanad the Election of Senators for the 24Th Seanad Took Place on Friday, April 29. While the Taoiseach Has Yet To
    News 24th Seanad The election of Senators for the 24th Seanad took place on Friday, April 29. While the Taoiseach has yet to announce his 11 nominees, all other members have been elected. These include; 5 to the Cultural and Educational panel; 11 to the Agricultural panel; 11 to the Labour panel; 9 to the Industrial and Commercial panel; 7 to the Administrative panel; 3 to the Trinity College panel; and 3 to the National University of Ireland panel. In terms of party membership, 18 of those elected are from Fine Gael; 14 from Fianna Fáil; 9 are from the Labour party; 3 from Sinn Fein; and 5 are Independents. A list of all those elected according to their panel is included below. Trinity College Ivana Bacik Sean Barrett David Norris National University of Ireland John Crown Fergal Quinn Ronan Mullen Agricultural Paul Bradford Paddy Burke Michael Comiskey James Heffernan Trevor O’Clocartaigh Brian O’Domhnaill Denis O’Donovan Susan O’Keeffe Jim Walsh Pat O’Neill Paschal Mooney Terry Brennan David Cullinane Labour Maurice Cummins Fidelma Healy-Eames Cáit Keane Marie Moloney Terry Leyden Tony Mulcahy Darragh O’Brien Ned O’Sullivan John Whelan Industrial and Commercial Colm Burke Jimmy Harte Imelda Henry Paul Coghlan Marc MacSharry Catherine Noone Averil Power Kathryn Reilly Mary White Administrative Martin Conway Mark Daly Michael Darcy Diarmuid Wilson John Kelly Denis Landy Tom Sheahan Cultural and Educational Michael Mullins Labhras O’Mhurchu Thomas Byrne Deirdre Clune John Gilroy PAI Directory 2011 The political changes that have taken place in 2011 have created a need for an accessible reference point on government, the civil service and parliamentary representatives.
    [Show full text]
  • The Irish Language and the Irish Legal System:- 1922 to Present
    The Irish Language and The Irish Legal System:- 1922 to Present By Seán Ó Conaill, BCL, LLM Submitted for the Award of PhD at the School of Welsh at Cardiff University, 2013 Head of School: Professor Sioned Davies Supervisor: Professor Diarmait Mac Giolla Chríost Professor Colin Williams 1 DECLARATION This work has not been submitted in substance for any other degree or award at this or any other university or place of learning, nor is being submitted concurrently in candidature for any degree or other award. Signed ………………………………………… (candidate) Date………………………… STATEMENT 1 This thesis is being submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of …………………………(insert MCh, MD, MPhil, PhD etc, as appropriate) Signed ………………………………………… (candidate) Date ………………………… STATEMENT 2 This thesis is the result of my own independent work/investigation, except where otherwise stated. Other sources are acknowledged by explicit references. The views expressed are my own. Signed ………………………………………… (candidate) Date ………………………… 2 STATEMENT 3 I hereby give consent for my thesis, if accepted, to be available for photocopying and for inter-library loan, and for the title and summary to be made available to outside organisations. Signed ………………………………………… (candidate) Date ………………………… STATEMENT 4: PREVIOUSLY APPROVED BAR ON ACCESS I hereby give consent for my thesis, if accepted, to be available for photocopying and for inter-library loans after expiry of a bar on access previously approved by the Academic Standards & Quality Committee. Signed …………………………………………
    [Show full text]
  • Seanad Éireann
    SEANAD ÉIREANN Déardaoin, 7 Bealtaine, 2015 Thursday, 7th May, 2015 ____________________ RIAR NA hOIBRE ORDER PAPER 42 SEANAD ÉIREANN 725 Déardaoin, 7 Bealtaine, 2015 Thursday, 7th May, 2015 10:30 a.m. ____________________ RIAR NA hOIBRE Order Paper ___________________ GNÓ POIBLÍ Public Business ____________________ 1. An Bille um Spórt Éireann, 2014 [Dáil] – An Tuarascáil. Sport Ireland Bill 2014 [Dáil] – Report Stage. ____________________ 2. Ráitis maidir le Lá na hEorpa agus Clár Oibre an Choimisiúin Eorpaigh. Statements on Europe Day and the European Commission's Work Programme. ____________________ Tairiscint: Motion: 3. “Go nglacann Seanad Éireann le ‘Clár That Seanad Éireann adopts the 'EU Oibre Grinnscrúdaithe AE, 2015, Tosaíochtaí Scrutiny Work Programme 2015, Joint Comhchoistí’ a leag an Comhchoiste um Committees' Priorities' which was laid before Ghnóthaí an Aontais Eorpaigh faoi bhráid Seanad Éireann on 9 April 2015 by the Joint Sheanad Éireann an 9 Aibreán, 2015. Committee on European Union Affairs.” – Senator Maurice Cummins. ____________________ 4. An Bille um Rialáil Seirbhísí Dlí, 2011 [Dáil] – An Dara Céim. Legal Services Regulation Bill 2011 [Dáil] – Second Stage. ____________________ 5. An Bille um Thionóntachtaí Cónaithe (Leasú) (Uimh. 2), 2012 [Dáil] – An Coiste. Residential Tenancies (Amendment) (No. 2) Bill 2012 [Dáil] – Committee. ____________________ 6. An Bille Cróinéirí, 2007 – An Coiste. Coroners Bill 2007 – Committee. ____________________ 7. Bille na Lia-Chleachtóirí (Leasú), 2014 – An Coiste. Medical Practitioners (Amendment) Bill 2014 – Committee. ____________________ 726 7 Bealtaine, 2015 8. Ráitis maidir leis an Tuarascáil ón nGasra Comhairleach um Cháin agus Leas Sóisialach ar Thacaíocht Leanaí agus Ioncaim Teaghlaigh (atógáil). Statements on the Advisory Group on Tax and Social Welfare Report on Child and Family Income Support (resumed).
    [Show full text]
  • 8Th Amendment Referendum 2018
    The Eighth Amendment Referendum 2018 Background The National Library has been preserving Irish websites in its Selective web archive since 2011. During this time, the NLI has archived many political collections, including all elections and referendums that have been held since 2011.The NLI has also archived selected websites surrounding the abortion debate in Ireland since 2012. When published, the Eighth Amendment Referendum 2018 collection will be the largest referendum collection in the NLI’s web archive. This referendum collection forms part of a larger collection in the National Library of Ireland which will include published, printed and ephemeral material. Site selection Site selection was carried out by Maria Ryan, Web Archivist, in accordance with the National Library’s collection development policy. Extent In early 2018, the NLI made an advance commitment to allocate staff resources and half of its total 2018 web archiving budget to collect 100 websites related to the upcoming referendum as part of the selective web archiving programme for 2018. Scope and content of resulting collection Site identification & Selection: The NLI selective web archive operates on a permissions basis. Each website that is selected for inclusion in the web archive as well as the NLI’s technical partner has to be notified in writing in advance of archiving. It is common that the contact details of a site owner are difficult to locate and much time is spent trying to identify the webmaster or site owner. Every effort is made to locate contact details for sites scoped. This is an ongoing issue for the NLI selective web archive.
    [Show full text]