DOCSLIB.ORG

Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENT WATER QUALITY CONTROL COMMISSION 5 CCR 1002-93 REGULATION #93 COLORADO'S SECTION 303(D) LIST OF IMPAIRED WATERS AND MONITORING AND EVALUATION LIST ADOPTED: March 17, 2004 EFFECTIVE: M a y 3 , 2004 ADOPTED: March 14, 2006 EFFECTIVE: April 30, 2006 ADOPTED: March 11, 2008 EFFECTIVE: April 30, 2008 ADOPTED: March 9, 2010 EFFECTIVE: April 30, 2010 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENT WATER QUALITY CONTROL COMMISSION 5 CCR 1002-93 REGULATION #93 COLORADO'S SECTION 303(D) LIST OF IMPAIRED WATERS AND MONITORING AND EVALUATION LIST 93.1 Authority These regulations are promulgated pursuant to section 25-8-101 et seq C.R.S. as amended, and in particular, 25-8-202 (1) (a), (b), (i), (2) and (6); 25-8-203 and 25-8-204. 93.2 Purpose This regulation establishes Colorado’s List of Water-Quality-Limited Segments Requiring Total Maximum Daily Loads (“TMDLs”) and Colorado’s Monitoring and Evaluation List. (1) The list of Water-Quality-Limited Segments Requiring TMDLs fulfills requirements of section 303(d) of the federal Clean Water Act which requires that states submit to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency a list of those waters for which technology-based effluent limitations and other required controls are not stringent enough to implement water quality standards. (2) Colorado’s Monitoring and Evaluation List identifies water bodies where there is reason to suspect water quality problems, but there is also uncertainty regarding one or more factors, such as the representative nature of the data. Water bodies that are impaired, but it is unclear whether the cause of impairment is attributable to pollutants as opposed to pollution, are also placed on the Monitoring and Evaluation List. This Monitoring and Evaluation list is a state-only document that is not subject to EPA approval. 93.3 Water Bodies Requiring TMDLs or Identified for Monitoring and Evaluation Only those segments where a Clean Water Section 303(d) Impairment has been determined require TMDLs. For these segments, TMDLs are only required for those parameters that are identified as impairments. Listings marked with an asterisk (*) are carryover from the 1998 303(d) List. Consequently they are all high priority. Colorado’s Clean Water Monitoring & Act Section 303(d) WBID Segment Description Portion Evaluation 303(d) Priority Parameter(s) Impairment COAR Arkansas River Basin 1 Colorado’s Clean Water Monitoring & Act Section 303(d) WBID Segment Description Portion Evaluation 303(d) Priority Parameter(s) Impairment Fountain Creek and tributaries COARFO01a all E. coli, Se H/L above Monument Creek Fountain Creek, Monument Creek COARFO02a all E. coli H to Hwy 47 Fountain Creek from Hwy 47 to Se, E. coli COARFO02b all L/H the Arkansas River (May-October) All tribs to Fountain Creek, which COARFO04 are not on National Forest or Air all E. coli H Force Academy Land Below Mesa Road (for Se Monument Creek from National Se, E. coli COARFO06 only) L/H Forest to Fountain Creek (May-October) All (for E. coli) Willow Aquatic Life Pikeview Reservoir, Willow Springs COARFO07a Use (PCE M Springs Ponds #1 and #2 Ponds #1 & FCA) #2 Arkansas River, Fountain Creek to COARLA01a all Se, SO L Colorado Canal headgate 4 Arkansas River, Colorado Canal COARLA01b all Se L headgate to John Martin Reservoir Arkansas River, John Martin COARLA01c all Se, U L Reservoir to stateline Apishapa River, Timpas Creek, COARLA04 all Se L Lorencito Canyon Apishapa River, Timpas Creek, COARLA04 Timpas Creek Fe(Trec) H Lorencito Canyon Purgatoire River from source to I- COARLA05a all Se L 25 2 Colorado’s Clean Water Monitoring & Act Section 303(d) WBID Segment Description Portion Evaluation 303(d) Priority Parameter(s) Impairment Aquatic Life Trinidad Reservoir, Long Canyon Trinidad Use (Hg FCA), COARLA05b H Reservoir, and Lake Dorothey Reservoir D.O. (temperature) Purgatoire River, I-25 to Arkansas COARLA07 all sediment Se L River Mainstem of Adobe Creek and COARLA09a all Se L Gageby Creek… Mainstem of Adobe Creek and COARLA09a Horse Creek Fe(Trec) H Gageby Creek… Mainstem of Adobe Creek and COARLA09a Adobe Creek E. coli H Gageby Creek… Apache Creek, Breckenridge Creek, Little Horse Creek, Bob COARLA09b all Se L Creek, Wildhorse Creek, Wolf Creek, Big Sandy Creek Fe(Trec), Se Rule Creek, Muddy Creek, Zn As specified COARLA09c Caddoa Creek, Clay Creek, Cat L to right (Chicosa Creek… (Rule Creek) Creek) Two Buttes Res., Two Buttes Pond, Hasty Lake, Holbrook Res., Adobe Creek Burchfield Lake, Nee-Skah COARLA10 Res., Nee Se L (Queens) Res., Adobe Creek Gronda Res Res., Neeso Pah Res., Nee Nosha Res., Nee Gronda Res. COARLA11 John Martin Reservoir all Se L COARLA12 Lake Henry, Lake Meredith all Se L COARMA04a Wildhorse Creek all NO2 E. coli H St. Charles River and tributaries, COARMA06 all U Se L CF&I diversion to Arkansas River 3 Colorado’s Clean Water Monitoring & Act Section 303(d) WBID Segment Description Portion Evaluation 303(d) Priority Parameter(s) Impairment Greenhorn Creek, including all tributiaries, from source to COARMA07 Greenhorn Highline Diversion all Cu, Zn Dam; Graneros Creek; North Muddy Creek Greenhorn Creek, including tributaries, from Greenhorn COARMA09 all Se Highline Diversion Dam to the St. Charles River COARMA10 Sixmile Creek all Fe(Trec), Se L Huerfano River, from Muddy COARMA12 all Se L Creek to the Arkansas River Cucharas River, from Walsenburg COARMA14 P W S d i v ersion to the outlet of all Se L Cucharas Reservoir Huajatolla Reservoir, Diagre Reservoir, Walsenburg Lower Horseshoe Aquatic Life COARMA16 H Town Lake, Horseshoe Lake and Lake Use (Hg FCA) Martin Lake (Ohem Lake) COARMA18a Boggs Creek all Se, Zn, U H Iowa Gulch from ASARCO water COARUA08b supply intake to Paddock #1 Ditch all Cd, Pb, Zn M (Iowa Ditch) Mainstem of Lake Creek and all all, excluding tributaries, lakes and reservoirs COARUA10 Twin Lakes pH, D.O., Cu H from source to Arkansas River Reservoir (including Twin Lakes Reservoir) Mainstem of Lake Creek and all tributaries, lakes and reservoirs Twin Lakes COARUA10 from source to Arkansas River Reservoir Cu (including Twin Lakes Reservoir) Tributaries to the Arkansas River, Teller Aquatic Life COARUA14b from Pueblo Reservoir to Colorado Reservoir Use (Hg FCA) Canal headgate 4 Colorado’s Clean Water Monitoring & Act Section 303(d) WBID Segment Description Portion Evaluation 303(d) Priority Parameter(s) Impairment Grape Creek including De Weese Res., Texas, Badger, Hayden, De Weese COARUA15 Hamilton, Stout and Big D.O. H Reservoir Cottonwood Creeks, Newland Creek North Fork Wilson Creek Fourmile Creek and tributaries, COARUA20 below As, Cu Cripple Creek to Arkansas River Independence Mine Mainstem of Eightmile Creek, including all tributaries, wetlands, Aquatic Life Brush Hollow COARUA27 lake and reservoirs, from the pH Use (Hg FCA), H Reservoir source to the mouth of Phantom D.O. Canyon; Brush Hollow Reservoir COGU Gunnison River Basin Gunnison River, Uncompaghre COGULG02 all sediment Se* H River to Colorado River Tributaries to Gunnison River, COGULG04a C r y s t a l Reservoir to Colorado all Se H River All lakes and reservoirs tributary to the Gunnison River and not on Juniata Aquatic Life COGULG04b national forest lands from the H Reservoir Use (Hg FCA) outlet of Crystal Reservoir to the Colorado River All lakes and reservoirs tributary to the Gunnison River and not on J a t z COGULG04b national forest lands from the Se Bottomlands outlet of Crystal Reservoir to the Colorado River Red Rock Creek within Black COGULG04c Canyon of the Gunnison National all Se H Park Surface, Ward, Tongue, Youngs, Tongue COGULG07 and Kiser Creeks not on USFS Creek, Ward Se land Creek 5 Colorado’s Clean Water Monitoring & Act Section 303(d) WBID Segment Description Portion Evaluation 303(d) Priority Parameter(s) Impairment Surface, Ward, Tongue, Youngs, Surface COGULG07 and Kiser Creeks not on USFS Fe (Trec) Creek land Kannah Tributaries to Gunnison River, Creek below COGULG08 Se H Kannah Creek USGS station 09152000 COGULG09 Fruitgrowers Reservoir all D.O. H COGULG11a Tributaries to the Smith Fork Lunch Creek sediment North Fork of the Gunnison from COGUNF03 Black Bridge above Paonia to the all Se H confluence within the Gunnison Hubbard, Terror, Minnesota and Leroux Creeks from USFS Leroux Creek, COGUNF05 boundary to N. Fork. Mainstem of Se* H Jay Creek, Jay Creek and mainstem and tribs of Roatcap Creek to the N. Fork Tributaries to the North Fork of the COGUNF06a Gunnison River not on USFS Short Draw Se H lands Coal Gulch, Tributaries to the North Fork of the Hawksnest COGUNF06a Gunnison River not on USFS Fe(Trec) Creek, lands Gribble Gulch Bear Creek, Reynolds Creek, Bell Creek, McDonald Creek, Cottonwood Creek, Love Gulch, Cow Creek, Dever Creek, German COGUNF06b Creek, Miller Creek, Stevens Big Gulch Se Gulch, Big Gulch, Stingley Gulch and Alum Gulch not on national forest lands from the source to the North Fork of the Gunnison River 6 Colorado’s Clean Water Monitoring & Act Section 303(d) WBID Segment Description Portion Evaluation 303(d) Priority Parameter(s) Impairment Bear Creek, Reynolds Creek, Bell Creek, McDonald Creek, Cottonwood Creek, Love Gulch, Cow Creek, Dever Creek, German Cottonwood COGUNF06b Creek, Miller Creek, Stevens Fe(Trec) Se H Creek Gulch, Big Gulch, Stingley Gulch and Alum Gulch not on national forest lands from the source to the North Fork of the Gunnison River Tributaries to the San Miguel River COGUSM02 Bilk Creek Cd from the source to Leopard Creek San Miguel River, Bridal Veil & below Idarado COGUSM03a
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Generalized Surficial Geologic Map of the Denver 1° × 2° Quadrangle, Colorado
    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR MISCELLANEOUS FIELD STUDIES MAP MF–2347 U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Version 1.0 PAMPHLET GENERALIZED SURFICIAL GEOLOGIC MAP OF THE DENVER 1° × 2° QUADRANGLE, COLORADO Compiled by David W. Moore, Arthur W. Straub, Margaret E. Berry, Michael L. Baker, and Theodore R. Brandt 2001 CONTENT AND PURPOSE rock landslide deposit” and “stabilized dune sand.” Large areas (generally >1 km2; >0.4 mi2) of exposed This map locates surficial geologic deposits of bedrock, mostly devoid of surficial materials, are Quaternary age in the greater Denver area and mapped with a symbol “R.” surrounding region. Physical properties of the deposits are described. The physical properties PARTICLE SIZE AND COLOR include dominant grain size, composition, potential to expand upon sorption of water, and others. Origins TERMINOLOGY and ages of the deposits, and their inherent geologic hazards are identified. The properties of deposits and We used geological and soil textural terms to materials on and near the land surface affect its describe the size of particles in the surficial deposits. suitability for societal uses. Examples of such use Particle sizes ranged from microns to meters in include large-scale landfill sites, gravel pits and rock diameter. The combined use of geologic and soil quarries, large-scale residential developments, terminology resulted from a necessity to consult greenbelts, utility lines, and roads. Planners, zoning various data sources to characterize the materials. officials, builders, and interested citizens should have Clasts are particles larger than 2 mm in diameter. We a clear grasp of how the properties of surficial used geologic terms to describe clasts.
    [Show full text]
  • Eleven-Mile Canyon Demonstration Project
    Case Study 4 The Eleven-mile Canyon Demonstration Project Project Overview The Eleven-mile Canyon Demonstration Project is located on the South Platte River in Park County, Colorado (figure 1). This project area is located in a semiarid (less than 15 inches of precipitation per year) portion of the foothills zone of the Rocky Mountains (Pennak 1977). The bedrock underlying this canyon area is comprised primarily of biotite granite that produces highly erodible, unproductive soils. This condition also results in sparse ground cover, contributing to the area’s erosive nature. The landscape is bisected by relatively steep, narrow drainages with abundant erosional stream channels. Figure 1: Vicinity map of Eleven-mile Canyon. Study reaches are identified by reach numbers. (The inset map identifies the location of the canyon within the Pike National Forest.) In the late 1800s a railroad was built in the Eleven-mile Canyon, further narrowing the Eleven-mile Canyon floor. Large native trees were removed Eleven-mile Canyon Demonstration Project from the valley floor for use in the nearby metropolitan areas. In the early 1900s the city of Denver began building reservoirs and associated conduits for water storage in the South Platte River corridor, for use by the increasing population. The releases from these reservoirs have created a hydrograph considerably different than what would be expected under historic conditions (figure 2). The removal of trees, location and maintenance of the road corridor, and modified flow releases from upstream reservoirs has created a stream system considerably altered from pre-European settler conditions. 3—43 Developing Monitoring Plans— Chapter 3 Figure 2: Comparison of a hydrograph from a regulated section of the South Platte River downstream of Eleven-mile Canyon to a more natural flow regime in Tarryall Creek, a tributary to the South Platte River.
    [Show full text]
  • Collbran at a Glance
    DRAFT DOCUMENT I. Acknowledgments The Town of Fairplay Comprehensive Plan would not have been possible without the substantial time generously donated by the Comprehensive Plan Steering Committee, town of Fairplay staff and the public. The long-term challenge is to maintain Plan ownership as Town Trustees and staff transition and to ensure that plan information is retained and communicated to future decision-makers and residents. A successful plan will include regular use, application of the vision and implementation of the goals and policies to land use decisions. The following participants are individually recognized for their contributions to this planning process. Maria Sims Board of Trustees Pat Poius Mayor - Fred Boyce Tommy DeBonis Mayor Pro-tem - Frank Just Trevor Messa Trustee - John Deagan Town Staff Trustee - LaNita French Town Administrator/Clerk - Tina Darrah Trustee - Gabby Lane Deputy Clerk - Claudia Werner Steering Committee Treasurer - Kim Wittbrodt Michael Simpson - Chair Police Chief - Dave Gottschalk Bill Davis Park County Staff Carmen Johnson Planning Director - John Deagan Charlie Schultz GIS - Kat Hererra Dale Fitting Greg Johnson Comprehensive Plan Consultants Jim Carpenter Western Slope Consulting, LLC Stephanie Carpenter RRC Associates Julie Bullock Lamont Planning Services Linda Balough Sopris Land-Use, LLC Page - 1 DRAFT DOCUMENT Community Vision Statement Town of Fairplay. Steering Committee Version Fairplay – The place we choose to live We are a self-sufficient, resilient and strong willed historic mining town in the heart of Colorado with a passionate sense of community and a connection to the mountains and surrounding beauty. We cultivate our entrepreneurial spirit and embrace tourism, economic growth and prosperity to create an attractive and vibrant community for residents and visitors.
    [Show full text]
  • History of the Baker/Steiner Barn
    3. Historical Background Please provide historical background information for the property. The Baker/Steiner Barn, constructed circa 1885, is one of the largest surviving and best preserved nineteenth-century log hay barns in the northern South Park. Connected with the Bakers and Schattingers, early pioneer families that played an important role in the historical development of ranching in the South Park, the barn is a highly visible reminder of the significant impact these families had on the area and the important role ranching, and more specifically hay production, played in the development of the Jefferson area. Early on, American Indians recognized the nutritious nature of the native grasses that sustained the large herds of game that roamed the South Park. In the 1840s, Anglo visitors such as Rufus B. Sage observed the healthy herds of bison, elk, deer, and antelope found throughout the park and identified the area as ideal for stockraising.1 However, the harsh climate conditions and remote location of the park discouraged Colorado’s earliest ranchers from settling in Park County. The discovery of gold along Tarryall Creek in 1859 made ranching in the South Park a far more attractive proposition. The gold strike at Tarryall brought hundreds of prospectors to the South Park. Seemingly overnight, large mining camps sprang up at Hamilton, Fairplay, Buckskin Joe, and other sites where gold had been found. The prospectors that flooded these rapidly growing communities needed food, creating a demand that encouraged the establishment of large cattle ranching operations in the wide open expanse of the South Park. Enterprising ranchers claimed land near reliable water sources and natural hay meadows, established their homesteads, and began raising cattle and growing hay.2 The success of these ventures attracted a growing number of settlers like David Baker and his wife Emily Vance to the South Park.
    [Show full text]
  • Colorado's 303(D) List of Impaired Waters
    COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENT WATER QUALITY CONTROL COMMISSION 5 CCR 1002-93 REGULATION #93 COLORADO'S SECTION 303(D) LIST OF IMPAIRED WATERS AND MONITORING AND EVALUATION LIST 93.1 Authority These regulations are promulgated pursuant to section 25-8-101 et seq C.R.S. as amended, and in particular, 25-8-202 (1) (a), (b), (i), (2) and (6); 25-8-203 and 25-8-204. 93.2 Purpose This regulation establishes Colorado’s Lists of Impaired Waters. These waters include Water- Quality-Limited Segments Requiring Total Maximum Daily Loads (“TMDLs”), impaired waters that do not require a TMDL, and Colorado’s Monitoring and Evaluation List: (1) The list of Water-Quality-Limited Segments Requiring TMDLs fulfills requirements of section 303(d) of the federal Clean Water Act which requires that states submit to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency a list of those waters for which technology-based effluent limitations and other required controls are not stringent enough to implement water quality standards. These segments are included in Section 93.3 with parameters included in the Clean Water Section 303(d) Impairment column. (2) Colorado’s Monitoring and Evaluation List identifies water bodies where there is reason to suspect water quality problems, but there is also uncertainty regarding one or more factors, such as the representative nature of the data. Water bodies that are impaired, but it is unclear whether the cause of impairment is attributable to pollutants as opposed to pollution, are also placed on the Monitoring and Evaluation List. This Monitoring and Evaluation list is a state-only document that is not subject to EPA approval.
    [Show full text]
  • Tarryall Tailwater Ranch Represents a Very Unique Offering Among Today’S Recreational Ranch Inventory Throughout the Rockies
    TarryallJEFFERSON, Tail waterCOLORADO Ranch JEFFERSON,Tarryall Tail COLORADO water RanchIntroduction: Tarryall Tailwater Ranch represents a very unique offering among today’s recreational ranch inventory throughout the Rockies. Rarely if ever does a property come to market with approximately 5 miles of private river ownership with almost 10 miles of shared property lines with Pike National Forest. In addition to the thriving riparian area and surrounding access to incredible public land, the ranch enjoys sweeping mountain views, big game hunting with landowner tags and convenient proximity to 2 major metro areas. The focal point of this 579- acre Colorado mountain retreat is the nearly 5 miles of Tarryall Creek, which flows directly out of the 175-acre Tarryall Reservoir directly onto the ranch. The Tarryall Tailwater Ranch is currently an agricultural operation used for limited, seasonal cattle grazing and hay production, while the private fishing resources are leased to Park County’s South Park Fly Fisher’s program and Rocky Mountain Angling Club, testament to the high quality angling opportunities at the ranch. The future of the ranch is an open-ended story with extensive possibilities including private family ownership or shared ownership among several like-minded investor/outdoor- enthusiasts, private fishing/hunting club serving the burgeoning Front Range population, or TARRYALL TAILWATER RANCH INTRODUCTION TAILWATER TARRYALL any number of other exciting possibilities. Given the rich riparian corridor, scenic splendor and myriad of wildlife that frequents the ranch, conservation easement donation possibilities abound as well. With an elevation ranging from 8,800 ft to 9,100 ft, the ranch is an appealing blend of productive sub-irrgated hay meadows, timbered draws leading to the Pike National Forest and Lost Creek Wilderness, towering rock outcroppings and rich riparian habitat.
    [Show full text]
  • Colorado Are Being Studied to Determine If They Should Be Recommended for Addition to the the STUDY AREA National Wild and Scenic Rivers System (National System)
    Chapter 1 Purpose Of and Need for Action CHAPTER 1 Purpose of and Need for Action 1.1 INTRODUCTION If any portions of the study rivers were found eligible and suitable, a recommendation for SELECTION designation would be forwarded to Congress, along with this document. Congress then The eligibility and suitability of 99.5 miles of the would determine if the recommended river(s) or North Fork of the South Platte River and river segment(s) should be added to the segments of the South Platte River mainstem in National System. Colorado are being studied to determine if they should be recommended for addition to the THE STUDY AREA National Wild and Scenic Rivers System (National System). All of the South Platte River The river segments identified for study total study corridor and most of the North Fork 99.5 miles and are located in Douglas, Jefferson, study corridor lie within the boundaries of the Park, and Teller Counties, in Colorado. The Pike National Forest (National Forest). Both study river corridors are mostly National Forest areas, however, include many private and local System lands administered by the Pike and government inholdings, and a 6.6-mile stretch San Isabel National Forests, Comanche and along the North Fork lies just outside the Cimarron National Grasslands, but also include National Forest boundary. This section is private inholdings and lands managed by mostly in private ownership but includes some Denver Water and Jefferson County. public lands managed by the Denver Board of Water Commissioners (Denver Water) and Jefferson
    [Show full text]
  • Water-Quality Characteristics of Selected Streams in Park County, Colorado, September 1999
    USGS science for a changing world Prepared in cooperation with Park County Government and the Center of Colorado Water Conservancy District Water-Quality Characteristics of Selected Streams in Park County, Colorado, September 1999 INTRODUCTION In 1998, Park County had 13,330 residents and was one of the fastest growing counties in Colorado based on percentage of change in population. With increasing population and development comes an increased demand for water resources and the potential to affect the quality of the resource. Local entities in Park County are interested in obtaining current information on the status of water quality in the county. This information can be used to improve land-use and water-management strategies and to help identify current (1999) and future water-quality concerns. The Middle Fork South Platte River Basin north of Alma Park County encompasses about 2,210 square miles in central Colorado and is adjacent to the eastern side of the Continental Divide. Most of Park County is situated in the headwaters area of the South Platte River Basin; major tributaries are Tarryall Creek and the South, Middle, and North Forks of the South Platte River (fig. 1). The southern part of the county is drained by streams in the Arkansas River Basin, including Badger, Currant, and West Fourmile Creeks (fig. 1). During September 13-16, 1999, the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), in cooperation with Park County Government and the Center of Colorado Water Conservancy District, conducted a EXPLANATION Xfci ^ense'8 T^ reconnaissance sampling of stream-water c go1 jjm~"-' O^k °O Sampling site Salt Creek Q^Antero quality at several sites throughout the county.
    [Show full text]
  • Town of Fairplay Comprehensive Plan
    Town of Fairplay Comprehensive Plan Prepared by: Western Slope Consulting, LLC Sopris Land Use, LLC Lamont Planning Services RRC Associates Adopted: October 7, 2013 Page - 1 Table of Contents Section Page Adoption Resolution 6 Acknowledgments 8 Community Vision Statement 9 Purpose and Use of the Comprehensive Plan 10 Plan Updates and Amendments 11 Legislative Basis and Plan Layout 13 Reasons for Updating the Comprehensive Plan 15 Community Involvement in the Planning Process 16 Fairplay Guiding Vision, Goals, Policies 18 Community Character, Design & Identity 18 Parks, Open Space & Trails 21 Transportation 24 Environment 28 Housing 31 Economy 34 Community Services & Infrastructure 37 Land Use & Planning 39 Governmental Coordination 41 Fairplay Comprehensive Plan Implementation Actions 42 Community Character, Design & Identity 42 Parks, Open Space & Trails 44 Transportation 45 Environment 46 Housing 48 Economy 49 Community Services & Infrastructure 52 Land Use & Planning 54 Governmental Coordination 55 Future Land-Use 56 Single-Family Residential 57 Multi-Family Residential 58 Transitional Multi-Use 58 Town Center 59 Page - 2 Section Page Commercial 60 Residential-Commercial Multi-Use 60 Light Industrial 61 Civic Center 62 Parks, Open Space & Trails 62 Gateways 63 Future Land-Use Summary Table 66 Annexation 71 Fairplay Almanac 73 History 73 Location 74 Land Tenure 75 Demographics 80 Economy 83 Other Governments 86 Climate & Environment 87 Geography 88 Housing 90 Transportation 91 Water & Wastewater Utilities 93 Facilities and Services
    [Show full text]
  • GHOST TOWNS – TARRYALL and HAMILTON Leroy R
    GHOST TOWNS – TARRYALL AND HAMILTON LeRoy R. HAPEN Colorado Magazine, Volume 4, July 1933- Pages 137-143 A mining rush often gives birth to mushroom towns that disappear almost as quickly as they rose. Placer mines are short lived almost without exception; settlements built on placer gravel soon become ghost towns. Such was the fate of the two camps whose story is recounted briefly. Gold discoveries along the Tarryall Creek in the summer of 1859 brought a rush to the northwest portion of South Park. The rich lodes that had been discovered in the Central City region, following the initial find of John H. GREGORY on May 6, 1859, had already been taken up and gold seekers had scattered in all directions to search for other rich deposits. Among the first prospectors to Enter South Park were W. M. SLAUGHTER, J. B. KENNEDY and Dr. J. L. SHANK. This little party was set upon by Indians on June 26, 1859, and KENNEDY and SHANK were killed. 1 A party of miners from Gregory diggings organized a punitive expedition, went to the scene of the tragedy, and hunted for the offenders, but they did not succeed in locating the murderers. Indian dangers, however, did not keep other gold seekers from prospecting the region. Under the title, “History of the Tarryall Mines,” the Miner’s Record, published at the Tarryall diggings in 1861, gives the following account of the fisrt gold discovery in that district: “On the 13th day of July 1859, fourteen men, W. J. HOLMAN, E. HAMILTON, W. J. CURTICE, M.
    [Show full text]
  • Pike & San Isabel National Forests
    Prospectus: Campground and Related Granger-Thye Concessions Pike & San Isabel National Forests Pueblo, Colorado U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service MAY 2019 Updated May 28, 2019 Prospectus: Campground and Related Granger-Thye Concessions Pike & San Isabel National Forests Pueblo, Colorado U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service MAY 2019 USDA Forest Service FS-2700-34 (REV-02/2017) OMB No. 0596-0082 The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or part of an individual’s income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, DC 20250-9410, or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720- 8382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Previous edition obsolete Page 1 of 88 Prospectus for Campground and Related Granger-Thye Concessions, Pike and San Isabel National Forests May 2019 Use Code 141 Prospectus for Campground and Related Granger-Thye Concessions Pike & San Isabel National Forests U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Forest Service MAY 2019 Page 2 of 88 Prospectus for Campground and Related Granger-Thye Concessions, Pike and San Isabel National Forests May 2019 Table of Contents Page Number I.
    [Show full text]
  • Horseshoe/Fourmile Auto Tour Lode Mining, a Hard Living from the Hard Rock
    Horseshoe/Fourmile Auto Tour Lode Mining, a Hard Living from the Hard Rock This series of auto tours crosses through National Forest lands and private landowners. Some of the historic mining sites may contain mine shafts and other dangerous mine workings, most of which are on private land. Visitors should exercise caution when leaving their vehicles. Follow the route of the Denver, South Park and Hilltop Railroad up Fourmile Creek into the era of lode mining in South Park. This 11 1/2-mile tour begins 1.4 miles south of Fairplay at the junction of Highway 285 and Fourmile Road. CHRONOLOGY-HORSESHOE/FOURMILE 1858-59 - Depressed economy after panic of 1857 sent gold seekers west 1859 - Gold discovered in Tarryall Creek 1860-63 - Height of small-claim placer mining 1861-65 - Civil War 1870s - Corporate lode mining of silver began 1871 - Coal mines opened near what would later become Como 1873 - Silver found at head of Horseshoe Gulch 1879 - Town of East Leadville laid out 1879-89 - $82,000,000 in silver taken from Leadville 1879 - Railroad reached South Park 1880 - Mudsill Mine opened 1881 - Town of Horseshoe platted and incorporated 1884 - Train reached Leadville over Boreas Pass 1887 - Hilltop Mine opened 1892 - South Platte Forest Reserve created 1892 - Leavick founded 1893 - Sherman Act demonetized silver; Colorado hit hard 1896 - Denver, South Park and Hilltop Railroad completed track up gulch 1900 - Horseshoe nearly deserted 1905 - U.S. Forest Service established 1907- Pike National Forest evolved from South Platte Forest Reserve 1923 - Railroad to Leavick shut down 1. The Pace of Change The peaks ahead once laid as flat as the plains of eastern Colorado.
    [Show full text]