<<

7559 431 Production of J3-glucosidase and diauxic usage of mixtures by Candida molischiana

Shelby N. Freer and Christopher D. Skory

Abstract: The fennentation of is a rare trait among . Of the 308 species that utilize cellobiose aerobically. only 12 species fennent it, and only 2 species, Candida molischiana and Candida wickerhamii, also fennent cellodextrins. Candida molischiana produced l3-glucosidase activity on all sources tested, except , , and . When these were added to cultures growing on cellobiose, the synthesis of l3-glucosidase ceased. However, the total amount of activity remained constant, indicating that the C. molischiana l3-glucosidase is catabolite repressed and not catabolite inactivated. When grown in medium initially containing glucose plus , cellobiose. , mannitol. or glucitol, C. molischiana preferentially utilized glucose and produced little l3-glucosidase activity until glucose was nearly depleted from the medium. When grown in medium containing cellobiose plus either fructose or mannose. the yeast preferentially utilized the and produced little l3-glucosidase activity. Candida molischiana produced l3-glucosidase and co-utilized cellobiose and xylose. maltose, or . Glucose and fructose. mannose. or trehalose were co-utilized; however, no l3-glucosidase activity was detected. Thus, the order of substrate preference groups appeared to be (glucose, trehalose. fructose, mannose) > (cellobiose, maltose, xylose) > (mannitol, glucitol).

Key words: glucose repression, trehalase. diauxic utilization, yeast,

Resume: La fennentation du cellobiose est un phenomene rare chez les levures. Pam1i 308 especes de levures qui utilisaient Ie cellobiose en aerobiose, seulement 12 Ie fennentaient et seulement 2 especes, Candida molischiana et Candida wickerhamii. fennentaient aussi les collodextrines. Candida molischiana avait une activite l3-glucosidase envers toutes les sources de carbone verifiees al'exception du glucose, du mannose et du fructose. Lorsque ces sucres etaient ajoutes ades cultures croissant en presence de cellobiose. la synthese de l3-glucosidase s'arretait, Par contre, l'activite enzymatique globale demeurait constante signifiant que la l3-glucosidase de C. moliochiana etait reprimee mais pas inactivee par un produit du catabolisme. Lorsque C. molischiana etait cultivee dans un milieu contenant au depart du glucose et soit du xylose. du cellobiose, du maltose, du mannitol ou du glucitol. la levure utilisait Ie glucose de fac;on preferentielle et son activite l3-glucosidase demeurait faible jusqu'au moment ou Ie glucose etait apeu pres epuise dan Ie milieu de culture. Lorsque cette levure etait cultivee dans un milieu contenant du cellobiose et soit du fructose ou du mannose. elle utilisait les monosaccharides de fac;on preferentielle et I'activite l3-glucosidase demeurait faible. Candida molischiana produisait une l3-glucosidase et co-utilisait Ie cellobiose et Ie xylose. Ie maltose ou Ie trehalose. Le glucose et Ie fructose, Ie mannose ou Ie trehalose etaient co-utilises, mais aucune activite l3-glucosidase n'etait detectee. L'ordre de preference pour les groupes de substrats apparalt done etre (glucose, trehalose, fructose, mannose) > (cellobiose. maltose. xylose) > (mannitol, glucitol).

iV/ots eNs: repression par Ie glucose, trehalase, utilisation diauxique, levure. [Traduit par la redaction]

Introduction Received September 26, 1995. Revision received December 16. 1995. Accepted December 19, 1995. Glucose. fructose. and mannose have significant effects upon S.N. Freer and C.D. Skory. Fennentation Biochemistry the expression of numerous genes in yeasts. Many ofthe genes Research Unit, National Center for Agricultural Utilization required for the metabolism of alternate carbon sources Research. Agricultural Research Service. U.S. Department of (. . maltose. glyceroL and ) are Agriculture (USDA), I 1815 N. University Street, Peoria. repressed during growth on glucose. while several genes IL 61604. U.S.A. involved in glucose utilization are induced during growth on glucose. Both glucose repression and glucose induction ofgene expression in appears to be primar­ ily regulated at the transcriptional level (Johnston and Carlson 1993; Entian and Barnett 1992; Gancedo 1992; Trumbly 1992). Product names are necessary to report factually on available data. How·ever. the USDA neither guarantees nor warrants Sevetalof the gluconeogenic (cytosolic malate the standard of the product. and the use of the name by dehydrogenase. phosphopyruvate carboxykinase. isocitrate USDA implies no approval of the product to the exclusion lyase. etc.) are glucose (catabolite) inactivated. Generally. the of others that may also be suitable. inactivation of these enzymes by glucose starts 5-10 min after

Can. J. Microbial. 42: 431-436 (1996). Printed in Canada / Imprime au Canada 432 Can. J. Microbial. Vol. 42, 1996 the addition of glucose to cells growing on nonfermentable The enzyme is produced constitutively. except that glucose. carbon sources and the activity of these enzymes is greatly fructose. and mannose at concentrations > 25 gIL. repress its reduced within I h. Glucose inactivation is irreversible and expression; the aeration state had no effect upon f3-glucosidase appears to depend upon targeting specific enzymes to the expression. Under all conditions tested. diauxic utilization of vacuole where they are inactivated by vacuole protease(s). The glucose-cellobiose mixtures was observed (Freer 1995). mechanism by which glucose triggers this process is unknown Because of the potential utility of these unique enzymes in (Entian and Barnett 1992; Holzer 1976). Although our under­ the biofuels and food and beverage industries. experiments standing of glucose repression in S. cerevisiae has increased were performed to characterize the effect that various sugar greatly in the last 10 years. the exact mechanism ofhow glucose mixtures have upon f3-g1ucosidase production by C. molis­ triggers the cessation of synthesis of specific enzyme is still chiana. The results showed that the f3-glucosidase was catabo­ incomplete and even less is known about the mechanisms that lite (glucose) repressed. while an extracytoplasmic trehalase regulate glucose repression in other yeasts. was constitutively produced. Because of the similarities Many yeasts utilize cellobiose when grown aerobically; between the f3-glucosidase and trehalase. this might be a valu­ however. few yeasts ferment it. Of the approximately able aid in studying the underlying mechanisms of glucose 800 known yeast species. 308 yeasts aerobically utilize cello­ repression in yeast. biose. while only 12 of these species also ferment it (Barnett 1976). The majority of the cellobiose-fermenting yeasts pro­ Materials and methods duce a cytoplasmic f3-IA-glucosidase(s) (EC 3.2.1.21) and ferment only cellobiose. In contrast. two yeast species. Can­ Source of chemicals and yeast dida molischiana and Candida ,vickerhamii (syn. Torulopsis Glucose. peptone. yeast extract. and malt extract were purchased from molischiana and Torulopsis wickerhamii. respectively). pro­ Difco Laboratories. Detroit. Mich. p-Nitrophenyl 13-o-gluco­ duce an extracytoplasmic f3-g1ucosidase(s) that enables them pyranoside (pNPG). 13-0-(+)-cellobiose. xylose. mannose. fructose. to ferment both cellobiose and cellodextrins of degree ofpoly­ maltose. trehalose. glucitol. mannitol. and the glucose detection kit. which was based upon the glucose oxidase - peroxidase reaction. merization 3 to 6 (Gonde et al. 1984; Freer and Detroy 1982; were purchased from Sigma Chemical Co.. St. Louis. Mo. All other LeClere 1984; Freer 1985. 1991; Vasserot et al. 1991). These chemicals were purchased from Fisher Scientific Co.• Fair Lawn. N.J. yeasts have potential for use in the production of fuel . The yeast NRRL Y-2237 Candida molischiana (Zikes) Meyer et When commercial fungal enzyme complex is used to Yarrow was obtained from the Agricultural Research Service Culture saccharify . one ofthe rate-limiting enzymatic steps is Collection. National Center for Agricultural Utilization Research. the conversion of cellobiose to glucose by f3-glucosidase Peoria. Ill. (Desrochers et al. 1981: Sternberg et al. 1977). If yeasts that ferment both glucose and cellobiose are used in the simultane­ Media and culture conditions ous saccharification-fermentation ofcellulose. 10-30% more The basal medium. adjusted to pH 6.0 with HCI. consisted ofpeptone. ethanol is produced (Freer and Detroy 1983; Spindler et al. yeast extract. and malt extract at concentrations of 5. 3. and 3 gIL. 1992) than in fermentations that employ S. cerevisiae (Savarese respectively. The basal medium was prepared at twofold concentration and Young 1978: Blotkamp et al. 1978: for a recent review see and the various carbon sources. dissolved in deionized distilled water. Grohman 1993). which is unable to ferment cellobiose. Addi­ were sterilized separately by autoclaving at 121°C for 20 min and tionally. yeast f3-glucosidases have potential for use in the food combined after cooling. Xylose was filter sterilized. Inocula were and beverage industry for the production offood flavors. Using prepared as described previously (Freer and Detroy 1982) by growing the yeast aerobically for 24 h in 20 mL of basal medium containing Muscat grape marc as a substrate. Vasserot et al. (1991) dem­ 20 g glucose/L. The cells were harvested aseptically by centrifugation. onstrated that the C. molischiana f3-g1ucosidase produced washed once with water. and resuspended in 10 mL of sterile water. monoterpenols from monoterpene heterosides. Thirty millilitres of experimental medium in 50-mL flasks were A major obstacle in the production of f3-g1ucosidase is that inoculated with 0.225 mL ofcell suspension. Flasks were capped with glucose represses the expression of f3-glucosidase(s) in most either cotton (aerobic growth) or serum stoppers and vented with yeasts. For example. glucose at concentrations > 2 gIL 26-gauge sterile needles (anaerobic growth). The cultures were incu­ repressed the expression of f3-g1ucosidase in Kluyveromyces bated at 28°C on a rotary shaker at 250 rpm. All results presented lactis (Herman and Halvorson 1963a. 1963b) and Kluyveromy­ herein represent aerobic growth conditions. since it was detennined ces fragi/is x Kluyveromyces dobzharskii (MacQuillan et al. that anaerobic growth of C. molischiana with fennentable sugars 1960: MacQuillan and Halvorson 1962). These cytoplasmic (glucose. fructose. mannose. cellobiose. trehalose. and cellodextrins) enzymes are produced constitutively when the yeasts are grown yielded identical results (data not shown). on carbon sources other than glucose. fructose. and mannose (MacQuillan et al. 1960: MacQuillan and Halvorson 1962). Growth, , J3-glucosidase, and trehalase The regulation of f3-g1ucosidase expression by C. wickerhamii analyses is similar. but not identical. to that described in the above Growth was measured by the increase in optical density at 600 nm. To organisms. in that both glucose and the aeration state of the assay for 13-glucosidase activity. appropriately diluted cells plus medium were incubated with 0.5 mL of2.5 mM pNPG in 0.1 M acetic culture appear to regulate f3-glucosidase expression. When acid (adjusted to pH 3.5 with HCI) for 15 min at 28°C. The reactions grown aerobically. f3-glucosidase is produced constitutively. were tenninated by the addition of 0.5 mL of 0.4 M glycine-NaOH except that glucose at concentrations greater than 50 gIL (pH 10.8) and the amount ofp-nitrophenol produced was detennined represses its expression. When grown anaerobically. f3-glucosi­ spectrophotometrically at 400 nm (Freer and Detroy 1983). One unit dase is produced even in the presence of 100 g glucoselL (Freer of enzyme activity represented 1 !Lmol of product (p-nitrophenol) and Detroy 1985). The C. molischiana f3-g1ucosidase appears fonned per minute. To assay for trehalase activity. appropriately to be regulated in a similar manner to the Kluyveromyces spp. diluted samples were incubated with 0.2 mL of 50 mM trehalose in Freer and Skory 433

Table 1. Effect of glucose, fructose and mannose upon Fig. 1. Test for catabolite inactivation. After 24 h of growth in C. molischiana l3-glucosidase activity.a medium containing 50 g cellobiose/L, C. molischiana cultures were diluted with either basal medium or medium containing Additions I3-Glucosidase activity (%)" glucose. fructose, or mannose. Samples were taken various times and growth (e), l3-glucosidase activity (A). cellobiose (0). None 100.0' and concentrations (_) were measured. 10 mM glucose 91.3 100 mM glucose 56.6 250 mM glucose 38.2 60 6 50 10 mM fructose 102.0 9 Cellob;",," 100 mM fructose 98.0 50 1 5 250 mM fructose 98.0 10 mM mannose s::: 40 4 100.9 0 100 mM mannose 98.1 :.;:: ctl 30 3:::J 250 mM mannose 90.3 .. E ...... s::: o Ql 20 22- a - Candida lI10lischiana was grown for 5 days in YM medium -u that initially contained 50 g cellobioselL. .Js::: E 0 10 1f "The substrate (pNPG) concentration was 2.5 mM. 'QU :.;:: 0- 'The control contained 3.57 U/mL of l3-glucosidase activity. -.s:: 40 4 8 quantified by the addition of 2.0 mL of the glucose oxidase - peroxi­ 0 :::l dase reagent. Since 2 mol of glucose are formed from I mol of .0.. 30 3~ ctl trehalose, IU of trehalase activity represented 2 f.l.mol of glucose U = formed per minute. 20 2 To assay for medium . l-mLsamples were aseptically taken from the culture flasks at various times after inoculation. The 10 1 cells were removed by centrifugation at 8000 rpm for 10 min. and the ~ 0 residual carbohydrates in the medium were analyzed by high­ o performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) on a Spectrophysics o 1 2 3 4 5 6 70 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 P-4000 chromatograph fitted with a Waters 717 autosampler and a Time (days) Waters 410 refractive index detector. A Bio-Rad HPX-87C column was employed using deionized distilled water (85°C) as the mobile phase. 1.3 gIL). The fructose- and mannose-pulsed cultures coutilized the sugars and these monosaccharides had little inhibitory Results and discussion effect on l3-g1ucosidase activity (Table 1). Thus. even though fructose and mannose repress synthesis of the enzyme, they do Test for glucose inactivation not inhibit the enzyme activity. To test for glucose inactivation of the C. molischiana 13­ glucosidase, the yeast was initially grown in cellobiose­ Carbohydrate usage preferences and 13-glucosidase containing medium. After 24 h, parallel cultures were diluted production twofold with either basal medium or medium containing glu­ Previous results showed that the C. molischiana produced cose. fructose. or mannose. so that the final concentration of these sugars was 25 gIL. The results (Fig. 1) indicated that the l3-g1ucosidase when ethanol. glyceroL xylose, glucitol. manni­ addition of anyone of these monosaccharides caused the tol. maltose. trehalose. cellobiose. cellodextrins. or soluble immediate cessation ofsynthesis of l3-g1ucosidase, whereas the was used as the sole carbohydrate source and that glu­ control culture (basal medium addition) continued to synthe­ cose, fructose. and mannose (>25 gIL) repressed l3-g1ucosi­ size enzyme. After the addition of the sugars, the total amount dase expression (Freer 1995). To detem1ine the yeasts substrate of enzyme remained essentially constant for 2-3 days. Thus. preferences, C. molischiana was grown in medium containing the C. molischiana l3-g1ucosidase is not catabolite (glucose) mixtures ofvarious sugars. When grown in a mixture ofglucose inactivated. Similar results (data not shown) were obtained and either fructose or mannose. C. molischiana co-utilized the when the l3-g1ucosidase-producing cultures were initially carbon sources; however. a distinct preference for glucose was grown on ethanol and then diluted with these sugar-containing observed (Fig. 2). In S. cerevisiae. these three sugars are media. believed to share the same transporter; however. the apparent In the glucose-pulsed culture (Fig. 1). diauxic utilization of K m for glucose is approximately 10-fold lower than the appar­ the sugars was observed. even though the culture contained ent Kms for fructose and mannose (Bisson 1993). Although the 1.1 UjmL of l3-g1ucosidase activity. This is probably due to transport system of C. molischiana has not been stud­ end-product (glucose) inhibition of the l3-g1ucosidase ied. the usage of glucose. fructose, and mannose is similar to (Table 1). Gonde et al. (1985) showed that the purified, that seen in S. cerevisiae. secreted l3-glucosidase from a different strain of C. molis­ When C. molischiana was grown in medium initially con­ chiana was strongly inhibited by glucose (K j ::: 7 mM or taining both glucose and cellobiose, diauxic utilization of the 434 Can. J. Microbial. Vol. 42, 1996

Fig. 2. Utilization of glucose, fructose and mannose. Candida Fig. 4. Utilization of cellobiose. maltose. xylose. glucitol. llIo1ischiana was grown in medium containing fructose, and mannitol. Candida llIo1ischiana was grown in medium mannose, glucose + fructose, or glucose + mannose. containing cellobiose (D) and maltose. xylose. glucitol. or Growth (e).I3-glucosidase activity (A), glucose (_). and mannitol (_). Residual medium carbohydrates (including fructose or mannose (D) were measured. (+)). growth (e). and l3-glucosidase activity (A) were measured. 60 6 c: 50 25 9 Fructose/L 25 9 Mannose/L 5 ~ 6 o c: 50 ,50 9 Celiobiose/L 40 9 Celiobiose/L 5 +:: 40 4 :::J o ~5 9 Maltose/L 25 9 Xylose/L ~ E +:: (5 ~ 30 3 :5 E 40 l\ 4 ? ... ..c: 30 ',.., 3 :5 :::Jgw 2i o Ql -t.l ~8 10 1 '> ...I c: 20 2 -~ E 0 ~:::J ~ oU ~~~~~~~1~ $!~ ~~ 0­ 10 CD...I O__+-I---1F=:l1bo.111__-"~I-f--+-+-+-I--T-iO« ~ «- ~ 6 Ql l.; 50 5 -s rJl .c: Ql e -c 40 4 'iii J1;j 00 5~ C) >. 0 o ...... "0 ~ 4~ "§ 30 ---~.. 3 15 C)>. o .c: ~ 20 2 c:;; o W 3~ cc. .c ... W 2~ U 10 1 Cll cc. U o~~~:±:::t::±Wd:::cl::!s;t::tl 0 10 1 o 2 4 6 0 2 4 6 o 0 Time (days) o 2 4 6 a 2 4 6 Time (days)

Fig. 3. Utilization of cellobiose, fructose, and mannose. Candida llIolischiana was grown in medium containing cellobiose (D) and either fructose or mannose (_). Residual Fig. 5. Utilization of glucose. cellobiose. and trehalose. Candida medium carbohydrates. growth (e) and l3-glucosidase molischiana was grown in medium containing trehalose (D) activity (A) were measured. and either glucose (_) or cellobiose (0). Residual medium carbohydrates. growth (e). and l3-glucosidase activity (A) were measured. 60 50 9 Celiobiose/L _ 50 9 Celiobiose/L 6 ::J -::J.c::_- 25 9 Fructose/L --"\25 9 Mannose/L E 50 5 2- ~- ~ 60 6 ::J '. ':; 25 9 Trehalose/L E 40 .~ ~ 4 ;; Co) 50 5 2­ ~...... "'-

Fig. 6. Utilization of glucose and trehalose. Candida lIlo1ischiana was grown in medium containing either trehalose (0) and (or) glucose (_). Residual medium carbohydrates. growth (e), and l3-glucosidase activity (A) were measured.

c: 80 75 9 Glucose/L 65 9 Glucose/L 50 9 Glucose/L 4 0 10 9 Trehalose/L 25 9 Trehalose/L :;:::; ctS 60 3 ..J l- -E I- c: o -Cll 40 2 ::J -(,,) - >. .J c: ~ E 0 20 1 oU :;:::;> 0- (,,) co..J 0 _0)<- o < Cll .c: Cll f1l - 80 25 9 Glucose/L 10 9 Glucose/L 4 ctS ~~ 50 9 Trehalose/L 65 9 Trehalose/L 32 o I- 1-"'0 60, 3 f1l C)>. ~ 0 .c: (,,) 0 40 2 :::::l .Q G l- I ctS co. (.) 20 1

0 0 0 2 4 6 0 2 4 6 0 2 4 6 Time (days) glucose, fructose, and mannose repressed the expression of the were utilized in the presence of an excess of glucose (65 gIL). C. lIIo1ischiana l3-glucosidase and none of the carbon sources As the amount of trehalose initially present in the media tested overcame this repression. increased, glucose tended to increase, indicating that some of When grown in medium initially containing cellobiose and the trehalose was being converted to glucose. Thus, the treha­ maltose, C. lIIo1ischiana produced l3-glucosidase activity and lase produced by C. molischiana does not appear to be glucose coutilized the substrates (Fig. 4). No free glucose was detected (catabolite) repressed and the enzyme activity appears to be in the culture broths. Co-utilization also occurred in the culture resistant to end-product inhibition (i.e., the enzyme functioned grown in cellobiose and xylose: however, a large amount of in the presence of 65 gIL glucose). xylitol was detected in this culture (Fig. 4), as well as when the In summary, like the enzymes responsible for the metabolism organism was grown on xylose alone (data not shown). When of sucrose, galactose, maltose, glycerol, and ethanol in S. cere­ C. lIIo1ischiana was grown on mixtures of xylose and glucose, visiae (Johnston and Carlson 1993: Entian and Barnett 1992; fructose, or mannose, xylose utilization and xylitol formation Gancedo 1992; Trumbly 1992) and cellobiose in several was not observed (data not shown). Candida lIIolischiana Kluyveromyces spp. (Herman and Halvorson 1963a, 1963b: utilizes glucitol or mannitol as a sole carbon source (Freer MacQuillan et al. 1960: MacQuillan and Halvorson 1962), the 1995), but when grown in combination with cellobiose, the C. molischiana l3-glucosidase is glucose (catabolite) repressed. cultures preferentially utilized cellobiose and produced 13­ Glucose, fructose, and mannose repressed the expression of glucosidase activity (Fig. 4). this enzyme. None of the carbon sources tested relieved the Previous results showed that C. lIIo1ischiana produced 13­ repression, and unlike the C. ,vickerhamii l3-glucosidase (Freer glucosidase activity when trehalose was used as the sole carbon and Detroy 1985), the aeration state had no effect upon the source (Freer 1995). With trehalose-cellobiose mixtures, expression of the C. molischiana l3-glucosidase (data not C. molischiana utilized trehalose preferentially over cellobiose shown). (Fig. 5). Surprisingly, C. molischiana also appeared to prefer­ The order of substrate preference groups for C. molischiana entially utilize trehalose over glucose (Fig. 5). When grown in appeared to be (glucose, trehalose, fructose, mannose) > medium initially containing 50 g glucoselL and 25 g treha­ (cellobiose, maltose, xylose) > (glucitol, mannitol). The result 10seIL, the glucose concentration remained essentially constant that C. molischiana co-utilized glucose and trehalose was un­ for the first 3 days of growth, while the concentration of expected (Fig. 6). Other than the anaerobic use of glucose and trehalose was reduced to about 4 gIL. To determine if this was cellobiose by C. ,vickerhamii (Freer and Detroy 1985), this is truly diauxic utilization of the glucose-trehalose mixtures, the only other example, of which we are aware, of a yeast C. molischiana was grown in medium initially containing vari­ co-utilizing glucose and a . ous concentrations of glucose and trehalose. The results The majority ofthe C. molischiana trehalase activity appears (Fig. 6) indicate that C. molischiana co-utilizes these carbon to be associated with the cell surface. Cells plus media con­ sources. Relatively small concentrations of trehalose (10 gIL) tained 2.6 U/mL of trehalase activity, while the isolated cells 436 Can. J. Microbial. Vol. 42,1996 and clarified media contained 2.0 and 0.4 U/mL of activity, Freer. S.N., and Detroy. R.W. 1985. Regulation of 13-1 ,4-g1ucosidase respectively. The location of the enzyme(s), as well as the fact expression by Candida wickerhalllii. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 50: that glucose accumulated in the medium when C. molischiana 152-159. Freer. S.N., and Greene, R.V. 1990. Transport of glucose and cello­ was grown in medium containing high concentrations oftreha­ biose by Candida wickerhamii and C1avispora lusitaniae. J. BioI. lose, suggests that C. molischiana might not transport trehalose Chern. 265: 12864 - 12868. across its cytoplasmic membrane but, rather, first hydrolyzes Gancedo, J.M. 1992. Carbon catabolite repression in yeasts. Eur. trehalose and then transports the resultant glucose. This is J. Biochem. 206: 297-313. believed to be the mechanism by which C. molischiana and Gonde. P.. Blondin, B.. LeClere, M., Ratomahenina, R., Arnaud, A., C. lvickerhamii metabolize cellobiose (Freer and Detroy 1983; and Galzy, P. 1984. Fermentation ofcellodextrins by different yeast LeClere et ai. 1984: Freer and Greene 1990). strains. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 48: 265-269. The majority ofthe yeast trehalases studied to date have been Gonde, P., Ratomahenina, R., Arnaud, A., and Galzy, P. 1985. Puri­ fication and properties of a exocellular l3-glucosidase of Candida intracellular enzymes whose primary function appears to be to lIlolischiana (Zikes) Meyer and Yarrow capable of hydrolyzing control the intracellular trehalose concentration, which is soluble cellodextrins. Can. J. Biochem. Cell BioI. 63: 1160-1166. thought to play a role as a reserve carbohydrate, in thermo­ Grohmann. K. 1993. Simultaneous saccharification and fern1entation tolerance and in the germination of spores (Elbein 1974; of cellulosic substrates to ethanol. In Bioconversion of forest and Thevelein 1984: Wiemken 1990). Although the utilization­ agricultural plant residues. Edited by J.N. Saddler. CAB Interna­ fern1entation oftrehalose is not a rare yeast trait (Barnett 1976) tional. Oxen, U.K. pp 183-210. to our knowledge, this is the first report of a trehalase that Herman, A.. and Halvorson, H.O. 1963a. Identification of the struc­ tural gene for l3-g1ucosidase in Saccharomyces laeris. J. Bacteriol. appears to be involved in the utilization-fermentation of tre­ 85: 895-900. halose as a sole carbon source. It is interesting that the location Herman, A., and Halvorson, H.O. 1963b. Genetic control of 13­ (extracellular) and distribution (approximately 90% of the glucosidase synthesis in Saccharomyces laeris. J. Bacteriol. 85: activity is cell associated) of the C. molischiana l3-glucosidase 901-910. and trehalase are similar. Because these enzymes are similar, Holzer. H. 1976. Catabolite inactivation in yeasts. Trends Biochem. yet regulated differently, this might be a valuable model system Sci. 1: 178-181. for the study of glucose repression in yeasts. Johnston, M., and M. Carlson. 1993. Regulation ofcarbon and phos­ phate utilization. In The molecular and cellular biology of the yeast Saccharolll.vces, vol. 2. Edited by 1. Broach, E.W. Jones, and References J. Pringle. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press. Plainview, N.Y. Barnett, J.A. 1976. The utilization of sugars by yeasts. Adv. Carbo­ pp. 193 -281. hydr. Chern. Biochem. 32: 126-234. LeClere, M.. Gonde, P., Arnaud. A.. Ratomahenina, R., Galzy, P., and Bisson, L.F. 1993. Yeasts-metabolism of sugars. In Wine microbi­ Nicolas. M. 1984. The enzyme systems in a strain of Candida wickerhalllii l'vIeyer et Yarrow participating in the of ology and biotechnology. Edited by G.H. Fleet. Harwood Academic cellodextrins. J. Gen. Appl. Microbiol. 30: 509-521. Publishers, Chur, Switzerland. pp. 55-75. MacQuillan. A.M., and Halvorson, H.O. 1962. Metabolic control of Blotkamp, P.L Takagi. M., Pemberton, M.S., and Emert, G.H. 1978. l3-glucosidase synthesis in yeast. J. Bacteriol. 84: 23-30. Enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose and simultaneous fermentation l'vIacQuillan. AM.. Winderham, S.. and Halvorson, H.O. 1960. The to alcohol. Am. Inst. Chern. Eng. Symp. Ser. 74: 85-90. control of enzyme synthesis by glucose and the repressor hypothe­ Desrochers, M., Jurasek. L., and Paige, M.G. 1981. High production sis. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 3: 77-80. of l3-glucosidase in Schizophyllum commune: isolation of the Savarese, J.L and Young. S.D. 1978. Combined enzyme hydrolysis enzyme and effects ofculture filtrates on cellulose hydrolysis. Appl. of cellulose and yeast fermentation. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 20: Environ. Microbiol. 23: 222-228. 1291-1293. Elbein, AD. 1974. The metabolism ofex,ex-trehalose. Adv. Carbohydr. Spindler. D.D., Wyman. C.E., Grohmann, K., and Philippidis, G.P. Chern. Biochem. 30: 227-256. 1992. Evaluation of the cellobiose-fern1enting yeast BreUanomyces Entian, K.-D.. and Barnett. J.A. 1992. Regulation of sugar utilization custersii in the simultaneous saccharification and fermentation of by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Trends Biochem. Sci. 17: 506-510. cellulose. Biotechnol. Lett. 14: 403-407. Freer. S.N. 1985. Purification and characterization ofthe extracellular Sternberg, D., Vijayakumar. P.. and Reese. E.T. 1977. l3-glucosidase: l3-glucosidase produced by Candida wickerhamii. Arch. Biochem. microbial production and effect on enzymatic hydrolysis of cellu­ Biophys. 243: 515-522. lose. Can. J. Microbiol. 23: 139-147. Freer. S.N. 1991. Fermentation and aerobic metabolism of cellodex­ Thevelein, J.M. 1984. Regulation of trehalose mobilization in fungi. trins by yeasts. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 57: 655-659. Microbiol. Rev. 48: 42-59. Freer, S.N. 1995. Utilization of glucose and cellobiose by Candida Trumbly. R.J. 1992. Glucose repression in the yeast Saccharomyces molischiana. Can. 1. Microbiol. 41: 177-185. cerevisiae. Mol. Microbiol. 6: 15-21. Freer. S.N., and Detroy, R.W. 1982. Direct fermentation ofcellodex­ Vasserot. Y., Chemardin, P., Arnaud, A., and Galzy, P. 1991. Purifi­ trins to ethanol by Candida wickerhalllii and C. lusitaniae. Biotech­ cation and properties of the l3-glucosidase of a new strain of Can­ nol. Lett. 4: 453-458. dida molischiana able to work at low pH values: possible use in the Freer. S.N., and Detroy, R.W. 1983. Characterization of cellobiose liberation of bound terpenols. J. Basic Microbiol. 31: 301-312. fermentations to ethanol by yeasts. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 25: Wiemken, A 1990. Trehalose in yeast. stress protectant rather than 541-557. reserve carbohydrate. Antonie Leeuwenhoek, 58: 209-217.

Supplied by U.S. Dept. of Agriculture National Center for Agricultural Utilization Research, Peoria, Illinois