DOCSLIB.ORG

Appendix 1 - 6 October 2011 Contents

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Appendix 1 - 6 October 2011 Contents Maules Creek Community Council Inc. [email protected] www.maulescreek.org @upthecreek2382 www.facebook.com/maulescreek Appendix 1 - 6 October 2011 Contents Appendix 1 - Biodiversity Report by the Envirofactor Appendix 2 - Groundwater Peer Review by Water Resource Australia Pty Limited Appendix 3 - Soils and Rehabilitation Report by SoilFutures Consulting Pty Ltd Appendix 4 - Maules Creek Coal Greenhouse Gas Emissions Report by Dr Ian Lowe - Boggabri Coal Greenhouse Gas Emissions Report by Dr Ian Lowe - Greenhouse Gas Emissions by Country by the CDIAC. Appendix 5 - Environmental and Social Externalities Report by Dr Ian Curtis - Assessment of the habitat value of Leard State Forest by Economists at Large Appendix 6 - Official Documents o Letter from MCCC to Planning Minister re Underground Mining o Economic Assessment of Boggabri Coal Underground Option by Economists at Large o Letter from MCCC to Resources and Minerals Minister re Departmental Briefing o Letter from MCCC to Planning Minister re No Go Zones p 267 224 997 m 0408 224 997 To: Phil Laird From : Wendy Hawes, Terrestrial Ecologist COMMENTS: REGARDING MAULES CREEK COAL PROJECT PROPOSAL IN REGARDS TO FLORA AND FAUNA Hi Phil I’ve looked at the various reports associated with the Ecological Impact Assessment (EIA) for the Maules Creek Coal Project and following are my comments re this document. General Comments Much of the mitigation of the ecological impacts associated with the proposed Maules Creek Coal Project is contingent upon procedures and methods detailed in various management plans and guidelines identified within the EIA including: Biodiversity Management Plan Rehabilitation Management Plan Biodiversity Offset Management Plan Data Collection for Monitoring Reference Sites. All of these plans and/or guidelines are yet to be developed consequently, it is impossible to adequately assess the efficacy of mitigation actions in regard to this development. Avoidance of impacts associated with the development appears haphazard. The location of infrastructure as shown in the EIA is only indicative. The EIA states that the siting of infrastructure may be altered to avoid areas of critically endangered ecological communities but only if it doesn’t impact on “efficiency and engineering practicality”. Unfortunately impact assessment cannot be adequately undertaken on indicative plans. Vegetation Clearance and Landscape Context As outlined in the document, this project will remove 2,178ha of vegetation the majority of which is native vegetation in moderate to good condition, including 544ha of the Critically Endangered Ecological Community White Box Yellow Box Blakely’s Red Gum Grassy Woodland and Derived Native Grassland listed under State and Commonwealth legislation (Maules Creek EIA report). Omitted from assessment under the EIA is a further 210ha of identified in the report as ‘low diversity derived native grassland with White Box’ which would constitute the NSW listed Threatened Ecological Community - White Box Yellow Box Blakely’s Red Gum Woodlands. Unlike the Commonwealth, NSW listing does not limit this EEC by condition criteria and includes, ‘degraded remnants that have few, if any, native species in the understorey This condition is typical of Box-Gum Woodland where agricultural practices have been more intensive (e.g. pasture improvement over long periods)’ NPWS(undated)1 The majority of native vegetation will be removed from Leard State Forest a large relatively intact remnant (approximately 7,500ha according to the EIA) within the Brigalow Belt South Bioregion, which has since European settlement been extensively cleared for agriculture. Less than 40% of native vegetation remains within this bioregion, the majority of remnants occurring as small patches and linear remnants on private land and along roads within a highly developed agricultural matrix of exotic pastures, cropping and irrigation. As a result of their small size and the surrounding landuse many of these remnants are in poor condition as a consequence of ongoing degradation as a result of weed invasion, inappropriate grazing regimes, fertilizer and herbicide application, firewood collection and regrowth control. Therefore, although Leard State Forest has historically been subject to forestry activities (which ceased some 20 years ago), its size and condition within this landscape make it a block of remnant vegetation of high conservation value and important for the maintenance of ecological function within the locality and region. This fact is not disputed by the EIA report. Large relatively intact remnants support meta-populations of biota essential for the on- going maintenance of species populations and the genetic diversity in small adjoining and/or remote remnants. Large intact remnants provide a buffer against the risk of local extinction in highly fragmented landscapes such as that within the Brigalow Belt South. What the EIA fails to acknowledge is the importance of such large remnants in sustaining populations of flora and fauna in a changing climate. The size and diversity of habitat within large blocks are important as they provide refugia and have the built-in resilience to ensure the on-going survival of our native biodiversity. This is because small populations within highly fragmented remnants, such as that outside Leard State Forest, will be at escalating risk of extinction with changing climate, due to increasing frequency of extreme stochastic events (floods, bushfires, disease and increasing temperatures). 1 NSW National Parks and Wildlife (undated) Identification Guidelines for Endangered Ecological Communities – White Box Yellow Box Blakely’s Red Gum Woodland. NSW Office of Environment and Heritage www.environment.nsw.gov.au Remnant Vegetation Cover The EIA depends heavily on an assessment of remnant vegetation cover locally (within 20km radius of the project area [ie 125,664ha]) as evidence that viable local populations of native flora and fauna not be significantly impacted by the project. The use of this device is misleading. While this methodology for conceptualizing habitat availability has its uses, it also has some severe limitations which have not been clearly outlined in the EIA. Table 4.3 presents estimated habitat figures both locally and for the sub-region, based on broad estimates of potential habitat in the following proportions: 30% forest and woodland, 43% grassland (includes both improved and native pasture) and 1% wetland. These proportions have been determined from landuse information provided in URS Australia (2001) Liverpool Plains Catchment Investment Report, which indicates 36% of land is under dryland cropping, 4.5% under irrigation cropping, 7.5% under improved pasture, 35% under native pasture and 17% under timbered native vegetation. It also assumes that, of the remaining areas not under agricultural use, another 10% is forested and/or woodland in State Forests, TSRs and National Parks. Please note, I have not read the URS report, so will have to take as read that these figures are those presented in the URS report and refer specifically to the Liverpool Plains sub-region Figures given in Table 4.3 appear to have been rounded down and up in a very ad hoc fashion. The area within a 20km radius is in fact 125,664ha not 125,600ha, the proportion of forest and woodland should be 27% not 30%, and the habitat available for the forest and woodland species is 33,929ha (32% less area than indicated by the 50,000ha threshold value used in the table). It is also debatable as whether improved pastures which may be also part of a cropping cycle should be included as grassland habitat in the calculations. This notwithstanding, what is also misleading about Table 4.3 is that there is no consideration of: habitat condition. Not all areas of these broad habitat categories will be suitable for occupation by the species under consideration. The suitability of any given area of habitat will depend upon individual species’ requirements which may be very general or extremely specific. Presence or absence of specific species’ requirements is often highly dependent upon the degree of degradation resulting from human activity. landscape connectivity. Not all species will be able to access all available habitat within the 20km radius, even if suitable, due to the highly fragmented nature of the landscape. The 20km radius includes extensive areas of remnant wooded vegetation along the Nandewar Range to the north and east, yet it is unlikely many sedentary species, such as woodland birds, reptiles and small mammals, within Leard State Forest could access this habitat. patch size – native vegetation remnants surrounding Leard State Forest and within the agricultural matrix exist predominantly as isolated patches, too small to support viable breeding populations of many species which often require habitat remnants greater than 100ha for their long-term viability. the cumulative impact on the habitat within and adjoining Leard State Forest of clearing 3,259ha (60% of forest and woodland and 38% of grassland) for all the various proposed mining projects (Table 4.4 - Maules Creek EIA). The impact incremental loss of habitat and therefore connectivity in the landscape is complex. The simplistic landscape assessment provided in the EIA as demonstrated in Table 4.3 is deceptive as it overlooks this complexity. It has been demonstrated (Pearson et al 19962) that for species with poor movement ability (ie those that require contiguous habitat for movement) the loss
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Newsletter No.67
    ISSN 0818 - 335X November, 2003 ASSOCIATION OF SOCIETIES FOR GROWING AUSTRALIAN PLANTS ABN 56 654 053 676 THE AUSTRALIAN DAISY STUDY GROUP NEWSLETTER NO. 67 Esma Salkin Studentship and proposed projects for the studentship Leader's letter and coming events Species or forms new to members Jeanette Closs, Ozotharnnus reflexifolius Judy Barker and Joy Greig Daisies of Croajingolong N. P. (contd.) Joy Greig More about Xerochrysum bracteaturn Barrie Hadlow from Sandy Beach (NSW) A postscript to 'Daisies in the Vineyard' Ros Cornish Leptorhynchos sprfrom-Dimmocks -Judy Barker Lookout Daisies on Lord Howe Island Pat and John Webb Ozothamnus rodwayi Beryl Birch Daisies for the SA Plant Sale on ~7~~128'~Syd and Syl Oats September Report from Pomonal Linda Handscombe ADSG Display at the APS SA Plant Sale Syd and Syl Oats Propagation pages - Ray Purches, Bev Courtney, Margaret Guenzel, Syd Oats, Judy Barker An innovative use for a rabbit's cage Syd and Syd Oats Members' reports - Corinne Hampel, Jeff Irons, Ray Purches, Jan Hall, Ros Cornish, Jeanette Closs, Syd Oats, Gloria Thomlinson June Rogers Podolepis robusta Financial Report, editor's letter, new (illustrated by Gloria Thomlinson) members, seed donors, seed additions and deletions, index for 2003 newsletters OFFICE BEARERS: Leader and ADSG Herbarium Curator -Joy Greig, PO Box 258, Mallacoota, 3892. TellFax: (03) 51 58 0669 (or Unit 1, 1a Buchanan St, Boronia, 31 55. Tel: (03) 9762 7799) Email [email protected] Treasurer - Bev Courtney, 9 Nirvana Close, Langwarrin, 3910. Provenance Seed Co-ordinator - Maureen Schaumann, 88 Albany Drive, Mulgrave, 3170. Tel: (03) 9547 3670 Garden and Commercial Seed Co-ordinator and Interim Newsletter Editor: - Judy Barker, 9 Widford St, East Hawthorn, 3123.
    [Show full text]
  • Zeitschrift Für Naturforschung / C / 54 (1999)
    602 Notes 16a,19-Diacetoxy-ewf-kaurane, a New Sephadex LH-20 to separate terpenoids from fla­ Natural Diterpene from the Exudate of vonoid aglcyones. The terpenoid portion (3.6 g) Ozothamnus scutellifolius (Asteraceae) was subjected to repeated column chromatogra­ phy on “flash” Si-gel using binary mixtures of Fco. Javier Arriaga-Giner3, Angel Rumberob increasing polarity (from H ex-AcO Et 10:1 v/v to and Eckhard Wollenweberc-* CH2Cl2-MeOH 20:1 v/v) furnishing 1 (19 mg), 2 a Tabacalera S. A., Centro I + D, c/Embajadores 51, E-28012 Madrid, Spain (72 mg), 3 (12 mg), 4 (25 mg), 5 (12 mg), 6 (23 mg) b Departamento de Quimica Orgänica, Universidad and 7 (9 mg). Autönoma de Madrid. Cantoblanco, Mass spectra were measured on a HP 5890 at 70 E-28049 Madrid, Spain eV via GC-MS. NMR spectra were recorded on a c Institut für Botanik der Technischen Universität, Schnittspahnstraße 3, D-64287 Darmstadt, Germany. Bruker AC-300 (300/75.4 MHz) in CDC13 or Fax: 06151/166878. CD3OD solutions. Multiplicities were assigned E-mail: [email protected] through DEPT experiments. * Author for correspondance and reprint requests 16a,19-Diacetoxy-e/ir-kaurane (1): White pow­ Z. Naturforsch. 54c, 602-604 (1999); der, mp. 112- 114oC. [a]D= -52.5 (c=0.55, CHC13). received April 1/April 29, 1999 Rf =0.44 (Hex/AcOEt 10:1). MS m/z (% rel. int.): Ozothamnus scutellifolius, Asteraceae, Leaf and Stem 390 (M+, -), 330 (M+ -AcOH, 13%), 315 (M+ - Exudate, Diterpenoids, Novel Kaurane Derivative AcOH-Me, 2), 270 (M+ -2AcOH, 4), 257 (13), 242 Leaf and stem exudate of Ozothamnus scutellifolius, (7), 221 (14), 161 (16), 119 (23), 106 (47), 94 (100), previously reported to contain 21 flavonoid aglycones, 81 (24), 67 (16), 55 (22) and 43 (73).
    [Show full text]
  • Indigenous Plants of Bendigo
    Produced by Indigenous Plants of Bendigo Indigenous Plants of Bendigo PMS 1807 RED PMS 432 GREY PMS 142 GOLD A Gardener’s Guide to Growing and Protecting Local Plants 3rd Edition 9 © Copyright City of Greater Bendigo and Bendigo Native Plant Group Inc. This work is Copyright. Apart from any use permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced by any process without prior written permission from the City of Greater Bendigo. First Published 2004 Second Edition 2007 Third Edition 2013 Printed by Bendigo Modern Press: www.bmp.com.au This book is also available on the City of Greater Bendigo website: www.bendigo.vic.gov.au Printed on 100% recycled paper. Disclaimer “The information contained in this publication is of a general nature only. This publication is not intended to provide a definitive analysis, or discussion, on each issue canvassed. While the Committee/Council believes the information contained herein is correct, it does not accept any liability whatsoever/howsoever arising from reliance on this publication. Therefore, readers should make their own enquiries, and conduct their own investigations, concerning every issue canvassed herein.” Front cover - Clockwise from centre top: Bendigo Wax-flower (Pam Sheean), Hoary Sunray (Marilyn Sprague), Red Ironbark (Pam Sheean), Green Mallee (Anthony Sheean), Whirrakee Wattle (Anthony Sheean). Table of contents Acknowledgements ...............................................2 Foreword..........................................................3 Introduction.......................................................4
    [Show full text]
  • Native Plant Species List
    Understorey Network Brighton Plant Species List This plant species list is a sample of species that occur in your municipality and are relatively easy to grow or to purchase from a native plant nursery. Some of the more common plants are listed, as well as uncommon species that have a limited distribution and only occur in your area. However, many more species could be included on the list. Observing your local bush is a good way to get an idea of what else may be grown in your area and is suited to your property. To help choose your plants, each species is scored against soil type, vegetation community and uses. An extensive listing of suitable species can be found on the NRM South and (kangaroo grass) Understorey Network websites. Themeda triandra Brighton Coastal Vegetation Coastal Rainforest Eucalypt Forest Wet Woodland and Dry Eucalypt Forest Vegetation Grassy Heath Wetland Sedgeland and Riparian Vegetation Montane drained soil Well drained soil Poorly Sandy soil Loamy soil Clay soil soil Poor soil Fertile Low flammablity Erosion control Shelter belts Bush tucker Wise Water Salinity control Easy to propagate from seed Easy to propagate from cuttings Easy to propagate by division Standard Common Grow Vegetation Community Soil Type Uses from Name Name Endemic Trees Acacia dealbata silver wattle • • • • • • • • • • • • Acacia mearnsii black wattle • • • • • • • • • • • Acacia verticillata prickly mimosa • • • • • • • • • • • • • Allocasuarina littoralis black sheoak • • • • • • • • • Allocasuarina verticillata drooping sheoak • • •
    [Show full text]
  • List of Plants
    Indigenous Plant Nursery Plant Species List The following plant list contains some of the local native plants that may be available from the Edendale Indigenous Plant Nursery. Availability can vary so please contact the nursery for specific and seasonal availability of plants. Contact details: [email protected] Phone (03) 9433 3703 30 Gastons Road, Eltham VIC 3091 Open 7 days per week, 9.30am to 4.30pm Trees Species Common Name Size (height x width) Acacia dealbata Silver Wattle 6 – 30m x 5 – 10m Acacia implexa Lightwood 5 – 15m x 4 – 7m Acacia pycnantha Golden Wattle 3 – 10m x 2 – 5m Acacia mearnsii Black Wattle 8 – 25m x 6 – 10m Acacia melanoxylon Blackwood 5 – 30m x 4 – 15m Allocasuarina littoralis Black Sheoke 4 – 8m x 2 – 5m Allocasuarina verticillata Drooping Sheoke 4 – 11m x 3 – 6m Banksia marginata Silver Banksia 1 – 10m x 1 – 5m Callitris rhomboidea Oyster Bay Pine 9 – 15 m high Eucalyptus blakelyi Blakely’s Red Gum 15 – 24m x 10 – 15m Eucalyptus camaldulensis River Red Gum 15 – 50m x 15 – 35m Eucalyptus goniocalyx Long-leaved Box 8 – 20m x 6 – 15m Eucalyptus leucoxylon Yellow Gum 10 – 20m x 6 – 20m Eucalyptus macrorhyncha Red Stringybark 10 – 35m x 10 – 20m Eucalyptus melliodora Yellow Box 10 – 30m x 8 – 25m Eucalyptus ovata Swamp Gum 8 – 30m x 8 – 20m Eucalyptus pauciflora Snow Gum 8 – 12m x 6 – 10m Eucalyptus polyanthemos Red Box 7 – 25m x 5 – 15m Eucalyptus radiata Narrow-leaved Peppermint 10 – 30m x 6 – 20m Eucalyptus rubida Candlebark Gum 10 – 25m x 10 – 20m Eucalyptus tricarpa Red Ironbark 10 – 30m x
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 Census of the Vascular Plants of Tasmania
    A CENSUS OF THE VASCULAR PLANTS OF TASMANIA, INCLUDING MACQUARIE ISLAND MF de Salas & ML Baker 2016 edition Tasmanian Herbarium, Tasmanian Museum and Art Gallery Department of State Growth Tasmanian Vascular Plant Census 2016 A Census of the Vascular Plants of Tasmania, Including Macquarie Island. 2016 edition MF de Salas and ML Baker Postal address: Street address: Tasmanian Herbarium College Road PO Box 5058 Sandy Bay, Tasmania 7005 UTAS LPO Australia Sandy Bay, Tasmania 7005 Australia © Tasmanian Herbarium, Tasmanian Museum and Art Gallery Published by the Tasmanian Herbarium, Tasmanian Museum and Art Gallery GPO Box 1164 Hobart, Tasmania 7001 Australia www.tmag.tas.gov.au Cite as: de Salas, M.F. and Baker, M.L. (2016) A Census of the Vascular Plants of Tasmania, Including Macquarie Island. (Tasmanian Herbarium, Tasmanian Museum and Art Gallery. Hobart) www.tmag.tas.gov.au ISBN 978-1-921599-83-5 (PDF) 2 Tasmanian Vascular Plant Census 2016 Introduction The classification systems used in this Census largely follow Cronquist (1981) for flowering plants (Angiosperms) and McCarthy (1998) for conifers, ferns and their allies. The same classification systems are used to arrange the botanical collections of the Tasmanian Herbarium and by the Flora of Australia series published by the Australian Biological Resources Study (ABRS). For a more up-to-date classification of the flora refer to The Flora of Tasmania Online (Duretto 2009+) which currently follows APG II (2003). This census also serves as an index to The Student’s Flora of Tasmania (Curtis 1963, 1967, 1979; Curtis & Morris 1975, 1994). Species accounts can be found in The Student’s Flora of Tasmania by referring to the volume and page number reference that is given in the rightmost column (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Sussex Silver’ for the Cut Foliage Trade
    The effect of timing and pruning regimes on the yield and quality of Ozothamnus hookeri ‘Sussex Silver’ for the cut foliage trade Catherine Gavin BSc (Hons), WIT This thesis is submitted to Waterford Institute of Technology in fulfilment of the thesis requirement for the degree of Master of Science Based on research undertaken in the School of Science and Computing Waterford Institute of Technology under the supervision of Dr Nicholas McCarthy June, 2015 i DECLARATION I hereby certify that this material, which I now submit for assessment on the programme of study leading to the award of Master of Science is entirely my own work and has not been taken from the work of others, save and to the extent that such work has been cited and acknowledged within the text of my work. I authorise Waterford Institute of Technology to lend or photocopy this thesis in whole or part to other institutions or individuals for the purposes of scholarly research. ________________________________ Catherine Gavin BSc (Hons), WIT ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I wish to express my huge gratitude to my supervisor Dr. Cara Daly in helping me complete this project. I am indebted to you for your high standards, attention to detail and most importantly and amazingly your patience. Thank you for your moral support and constant reassurance that I could complete this research on time and to a standard that was higher that I would have hoped. To my Line Manager, Ciaran Walsh, thank you for allowing me flexibility in work to complete this research and arranging a much needed helpful hand with harvesting.
    [Show full text]
  • Newsletter No.68
    ISSN 0818 - 335X MARCH, 2004 ASSOCIATION OF SOCIETIES FOR GROWING AUSTRALIAN PLANTS ABN 56 654 053 676 THE AUSTRALIAN DAISY STUDY GROUP NEWSLETTER NO. 68 Leader's letter and coming events Species or forms new to members Helichrysum rutidolepis (Oberon) Judy Barker Calomeria amaranthoides Jeff Irons Fire Recovery Ros Cornish Tasmanian Garden Visit - November 2003 Pat Webb Summer flowering daisies at Mulgrave Maureen Schaumann In my Emerald garden Pat Tratt Pterocaulonsphacelatum Barrie Hadlow Ozothamnus ledifolius Pat Webb Propagation pages - Bev Courtney, Judy Barker, Matt Hurst. Mallacoota Magic Weekend Sylvia Oats Daisies for Christmas decorations Ros Cornish Cratystylis conocephala Judy Barker and Natalie Peate Members' reports - Sylvia Oats, Bev Courtney, Philip Wilson, Ros Cornish, Angus Stewart, Matt Hurst Reports from friends of ADSG - Pat Fitzgerald, Margaret Guenzel Christmas outing, We were wrong, editor's note. new members Calocephalus platycephalus x 213 Seed donors, seed wanted, Seed Bank list (illustrated by Betty Campbell) OFFICE BMRERS: Leader and ADSG Herbarium Curator - Joy Greig, PO Box 258, Mallacoota, 3892. TellFax: (03) 51 58 0669 (or Unit 1, la Buchanan St, Boronia, 3155.) Email [email protected] Treasurer - Bev Courtney, 9 Nirvana Close, Langwarrin, 3910. Provenance Seed Co-ordinator - Maureen Schaumann, 88 Albany Drive, Mulgrave. 3170. Tel: (03) 9547 3670 Garden and Commercial Seed Co-ordinator and Interim Newsletter Editor: -Judy Barker, 9 Widford St, East Hawthorn, 3123. Tel: (03) 9813 2916 Fax: (03) 9813 1195 WEB PAGE http:llfarrer.csu.edu.aulASGAPldaisy,html LEADER'S LETTER I am pleased to inform members that the Esma Salkin Studentship for the summer of 200312004 was awarded to Ray McMahon.
    [Show full text]
  • Norrie's Plant Descriptions - Index of Common Names a Key to Finding Plants by Their Common Names (Note: Not All Plants in This Document Have Common Names Listed)
    UC Santa Cruz Arboretum & Botanic Garden Plant Descriptions A little help in finding what you’re looking for - basic information on some of the plants offered for sale in our nursery This guide contains descriptions of some of plants that have been offered for sale at the UC Santa Cruz Arboretum & Botanic Garden. This is an evolving document and may contain errors or omissions. New plants are added to inventory frequently. Many of those are not (yet) included in this collection. Please contact the Arboretum office with any questions or suggestions: [email protected] Contents copyright © 2019, 2020 UC Santa Cruz Arboretum & Botanic Gardens printed 27 February 2020 Norrie's Plant Descriptions - Index of common names A key to finding plants by their common names (Note: not all plants in this document have common names listed) Angel’s Trumpet Brown Boronia Brugmansia sp. Boronia megastigma Aster Boronia megastigma - Dark Maroon Flower Symphyotrichum chilense 'Purple Haze' Bull Banksia Australian Fuchsia Banksia grandis Correa reflexa Banksia grandis - compact coastal form Ball, everlasting, sago flower Bush Anemone Ozothamnus diosmifolius Carpenteria californica Ozothamnus diosmifolius - white flowers Carpenteria californica 'Elizabeth' Barrier Range Wattle California aster Acacia beckleri Corethrogyne filaginifolia - prostrate Bat Faced Cuphea California Fuchsia Cuphea llavea Epilobium 'Hummingbird Suite' Beach Strawberry Epilobium canum 'Silver Select' Fragaria chiloensis 'Aulon' California Pipe Vine Beard Tongue Aristolochia californica Penstemon 'Hidalgo' Cat Thyme Bird’s Nest Banksia Teucrium marum Banksia baxteri Catchfly Black Coral Pea Silene laciniata Kennedia nigricans Catmint Black Sage Nepeta × faassenii 'Blue Wonder' Salvia mellifera 'Terra Seca' Nepeta × faassenii 'Six Hills Giant' Black Sage Chilean Guava Salvia mellifera Ugni molinae Salvia mellifera 'Steve's' Chinquapin Blue Fanflower Chrysolepis chrysophylla var.
    [Show full text]
  • Species List
    Biodiversity Summary for NRM Regions Species List What is the summary for and where does it come from? This list has been produced by the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (SEWPC) for the Natural Resource Management Spatial Information System. The list was produced using the AustralianAustralian Natural Natural Heritage Heritage Assessment Assessment Tool Tool (ANHAT), which analyses data from a range of plant and animal surveys and collections from across Australia to automatically generate a report for each NRM region. Data sources (Appendix 2) include national and state herbaria, museums, state governments, CSIRO, Birds Australia and a range of surveys conducted by or for DEWHA. For each family of plant and animal covered by ANHAT (Appendix 1), this document gives the number of species in the country and how many of them are found in the region. It also identifies species listed as Vulnerable, Critically Endangered, Endangered or Conservation Dependent under the EPBC Act. A biodiversity summary for this region is also available. For more information please see: www.environment.gov.au/heritage/anhat/index.html Limitations • ANHAT currently contains information on the distribution of over 30,000 Australian taxa. This includes all mammals, birds, reptiles, frogs and fish, 137 families of vascular plants (over 15,000 species) and a range of invertebrate groups. Groups notnot yet yet covered covered in inANHAT ANHAT are notnot included included in in the the list. list. • The data used come from authoritative sources, but they are not perfect. All species names have been confirmed as valid species names, but it is not possible to confirm all species locations.
    [Show full text]
  • Grassy Woodlands of the Goulburn Broken Catchment
    INTRODUCTION GRASSY WOODLANDS OF THE GOULBURN BROKEN CATCHMENT IDENTIFICATION AND MANAGEMENT HANDBOOK 1 Contributions: Coordination, Species descriptions: Wendy D’Amore (Euroa Arboretum); Additional species descriptions: Cathy Olive, Lance Williams (Euroa Arboretum); Introduction: Lance Williams Photographers: Gratefully acknowledged and listed underneath their photos. Photos were also sourced from NatureShare, where individual contributors are acknowledged, and from the Native Vegetation of the Goulburn Broken Riverine Plains (NVGBRP) publication. Copyright for the images remain with the photographers. Photos Front Cover: Jim Begley, Stephen Prothero Edited by: Jenny Wilson (Goulburn Broken CMA), Cathy Olive and Kate Stothers (Euroa Arboretum) ISBN: 978-1-876600-06-8 This publication is supported by the Goulburn Broken Catchment Management Authority through funding from the Australian Government’s National Landcare Programme. 2 INTRODUCTION Contents Introduction 2 Grassy Woodlands - their ‘original’ condition 3 What is a woodland? 5 Where are these woodlands, and what do they look like? 6 Management of Grassy Woodlands 8 How this booklet is arranged 8 Flora Species 9 n Grasses 10 n Groundcovers and Herbs 30 n Shrubs Below 1m 68 n Shrubs 1-8m 96 n Trees 119 Appendices 136 Glossary 141 Flora Species Index 143 References 147 Further Reading 148 1 INTRODUCTION INTRODUCTION 2 INTRODUCTION Grassy Woodlands - their ‘original’ condition The early European explorers and settlers in northern Victoria recorded - to a greater or lesser extent - their observations of the woodlands that they encountered in the early 19th century. Their descriptions provide us with the earliest written accounts of the appearance of these areas before European-imposed stock grazing, vegetation clearance and altered fire regimes transformed these landscapes.
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity Summary: Wimmera, Victoria
    Biodiversity Summary for NRM Regions Species List What is the summary for and where does it come from? This list has been produced by the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (SEWPC) for the Natural Resource Management Spatial Information System. The list was produced using the AustralianAustralian Natural Natural Heritage Heritage Assessment Assessment Tool Tool (ANHAT), which analyses data from a range of plant and animal surveys and collections from across Australia to automatically generate a report for each NRM region. Data sources (Appendix 2) include national and state herbaria, museums, state governments, CSIRO, Birds Australia and a range of surveys conducted by or for DEWHA. For each family of plant and animal covered by ANHAT (Appendix 1), this document gives the number of species in the country and how many of them are found in the region. It also identifies species listed as Vulnerable, Critically Endangered, Endangered or Conservation Dependent under the EPBC Act. A biodiversity summary for this region is also available. For more information please see: www.environment.gov.au/heritage/anhat/index.html Limitations • ANHAT currently contains information on the distribution of over 30,000 Australian taxa. This includes all mammals, birds, reptiles, frogs and fish, 137 families of vascular plants (over 15,000 species) and a range of invertebrate groups. Groups notnot yet yet covered covered in inANHAT ANHAT are notnot included included in in the the list. list. • The data used come from authoritative sources, but they are not perfect. All species names have been confirmed as valid species names, but it is not possible to confirm all species locations.
    [Show full text]