The Dynamics of the Post-Truth Era in Africa: History and Critical Thinking
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
PDF Communicating Fact Checks Online
FEBRUARY 2020 Communicating fact checks online Striking the balance between commanding attention and conveying information A JOINT BRIEFING FROM: About this briefing Misinformation causes real harm to people’s lives, health, finances and to democracy. We need good evidence on how to tackle it. This briefing is part of a research programme set up by Africa Check, Chequeado and Full Fact to find that evidence and make it useful. In this briefing Full Fact’s ResearcherDr. Dora-Olivia Vicol explores the evidence on how to communicate fact checks to strike the right balance between commanding attention and conveying information online. We thank Paula Szewach and the research team at the Africa Centre for Evidence for their help in gathering regional evidence. We also extend our warmest thanks to Prof. Lisa Fazio, Libby Miller and Tristan Fern for their kind comments on earlier drafts. We welcome feedback and comments at [email protected] Full Fact 2 Carlton Gardens London SW1Y 5AA k [email protected] D @FullFact K fullfact.org Africa Check Johannesburg K africacheck.org Chequeado Buenos Aires K chequeado.com This research was supported by a grant from Luminate. Published by Africa Check, Chequeado and Full Fact, February 2020. Published under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Communicating fact checks online Contents Summary ������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������4 Reach -
Fact-Checking and Debunking a Best Practice Guide to Dealing with Disinformation
978-9934-564-95-6 FACT-CHECKING AND DEBUNKING A BEST PRACTICE GUIDE TO DEALING WITH DISINFORMATION Published by the NATO Strategic Communications Centre of Excellence ISBN: 978-9934-564-95-6 Authors: James Pamment, Anneli Kimber Lindwall Additional Research: Leon Klingborg Project Lead: Ben Heap Project Assistant: Quentin Wight Design: Kārlis Ulmanis Riga, January 2021 NATO STRATCOM COE 11b Kalnciema Iela Riga LV1048, Latvia www.stratcomcoe.org Facebook/stratcomcoe Twitter: @stratcomcoe This publication does not represent the opinions or policies of NATO or NATO StratCom COE. © All rights reserved by the NATO StratCom COE. Reports may not be copied, reproduced, distributed or publicly displayed without reference to the NATO StratCom COE. The views expressed here do not represent the views of NATO. Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 5 INTRODUCTION �� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 12 1. Is it possible to evaluate debunking efforts? ...............................................................................................................13 2. Who is doing what? A guide to best practice..............................................................................................................21 3. Recommendations and future prospects ...............................................................................................................40 -
The Future of Reputation: Gossip, Rumor, and Privacy on the Internet
GW Law Faculty Publications & Other Works Faculty Scholarship 2007 The Future of Reputation: Gossip, Rumor, and Privacy on the Internet Daniel J. Solove George Washington University Law School, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.gwu.edu/faculty_publications Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Solove, Daniel J., The Future of Reputation: Gossip, Rumor, and Privacy on the Internet (October 24, 2007). The Future of Reputation: Gossip, Rumor, and Privacy on the Internet, Yale University Press (2007); GWU Law School Public Law Research Paper 2017-4; GWU Legal Studies Research Paper 2017-4. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2899125 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in GW Law Faculty Publications & Other Works by an authorized administrator of Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Electronic copy available at: https://ssrn.com/ abstract=2899125 The Future of Reputation Electronic copy available at: https://ssrn.com/ abstract=2899125 This page intentionally left blank Electronic copy available at: https://ssrn.com/ abstract=2899125 The Future of Reputation Gossip, Rumor, and Privacy on the Internet Daniel J. Solove Yale University Press New Haven and London To Papa Nat A Caravan book. For more information, visit www.caravanbooks.org Copyright © 2007 by Daniel J. Solove. All rights reserved. This book may not be reproduced, in whole or in part, including illustrations, in any form (beyond that copying permitted by Sections 107 and 108 of the U.S. -
Countering False Information on Social Media in Disasters and Emergencies, March 2018
Countering False Information on Social Media in Disasters and Emergencies Social Media Working Group for Emergency Services and Disaster Management March 2018 Contents Executive Summary ...................................................................................................................... 2 Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 2 Motivations .................................................................................................................................... 4 Problem ......................................................................................................................................... 5 Causes and Spread ................................................................................................................... 6 Incorrect Information .............................................................................................................. 6 Insufficient Information ........................................................................................................... 7 Opportunistic Disinformation .................................................................................................. 8 Outdated Information ............................................................................................................. 8 Case Studies ............................................................................................................................... 10 -
Deception Detection and Rumor Debunking for Social Media Victoria L
View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Scholarship@Western Western University Scholarship@Western FIMS Publications Information & Media Studies (FIMS) Faculty 2017 Deception Detection and Rumor Debunking for Social Media Victoria L. Rubin Western University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/fimspub Part of the Library and Information Science Commons Citation of this paper: Rubin, V. L. (2017). Deception Detection and Rumor Debunking for Social Media. In Sloan, L. & Quan-Haase, A. (Eds.) (2017) The SAGE Handbook of Social Media Research Methods, London: SAGE. https://uk.sagepub.com/en-gb/eur/the-sage-handbook-of- social-media-research-methods/book245370 DECEPTION DETECTION AND RUMOR DEBUNKING FOR SOCIAL MEDIA Citation: Rubin, V. L. (2017). Deception Detection and Rumor Debunking for Social Media. In Sloan, L. & Quan-Haase, A. (Eds.) (2017) The SAGE Handbook of Social Media Research Methods, London: SAGE. https://uk.sagepub.com/en-gb/eur/the-sage-handbook-of-social-media- research-methods/book245370 Abstract The main premise of this chapter is that the time is ripe for more extensive research and development of social media tools that filter out intentionally deceptive information such as deceptive memes, rumors and hoaxes, fake news or other fake posts, tweets and fraudulent profiles. Social media users’ awareness of intentional manipulation of online content appears to be relatively low, while the reliance on unverified information (often obtained from strangers) is at an all-time high. I argue there is need for content verification, systematic fact-checking and filtering of social media streams. -
Rumor Detection on Social Media: Datasets, Methods and Opportunities
Rumor Detection on Social Media: Datasets, Methods and Opportunities Quanzhi Li, Qiong Zhang, Luo Si, Yingchi Liu Alibaba Group, US Bellevue, WA, USA {quanzhi.li, qz.zhang, luo.si, yingchi.liu}@alibaba-inc.com Abstract 2017a; Cao et al., 2018). The focus of this study is rumor on social media, not fake news. There are Social media platforms have been used for also different definitions for rumor detection. In information and news gathering, and they are very valuable in many applications. However, some studies, rumor detection is defined as they also lead to the spreading of rumors and determining if a story or online post is a rumor or fake news. Many efforts have been taken to non-rumor (i.e. a real story, a news article), and detect and debunk rumors on social media by the task of determining the veracity of a rumor analyzing their content and social context (true, false or unverified) is defined as rumor using machine learning techniques. This paper gives an overview of the recent studies verification (Zubiaga et al., 2016; Kochkina et al., in the rumor detection field. It provides a 2018). But in this survey paper, as well as in (Ma comprehensive list of datasets used for rumor et al., 2016; Cao et al., 2018; Shu et al, 2017; Zhou detection, and reviews the important studies et al., 2018), rumor detection is defined as based on what types of information they determining the veracity value of a rumor. This exploit and the approaches they take. And more importantly, we also present several means it is the same as rumor verification defined new directions for future research. -
E-Conomy Africa 2020 Report
e-Conomy Africa 2020 Africa’s $180 billion Internet economy future Table of Contents Foreword ............................................................................................................................................ 2 Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................ 3 Acknowledgements ........................................................................................................................ 4 Section 1: The State of the Continent, Macro Trends, and Drivers of Change ............. 5 Section 2: Africa’s Growing Internet Economy, Trends, and Projections ...................... 11 Development Opportunities within the Informal Sector .............................. 26 Section 3: Overview of Africa’s Growing Developer and Digital Talent ....................... 28 Section 4: A Review of Africa’s Venture Capital and Funding Landscape .................. 45 Section 5: The Role of Africa’s Hubs and Accelerators ................................................... 52 The Impact of Global Tech Initiatives on Africa’s Internet Economy ................................................................................ 58 Section 6: Infrastructure is Key: Increasing Connectivity on the Continent ............. 60 Section 7: Regulatory Hurdles and Opportunities for Africa’s Internet Economy ..... 69 Appendix: Abbreviations and Acronyms .................................................................................. 81 References ..................................................................................................................................... -
Regional Report Media Programme Sub-Sahara Africa
August 2019 Regional report Media Programme Sub-Sahara Africa Fact vs. Fake The impact of fact-checking and its measurement by African fact-checking organisations Franziska Krämer Shenilla Mohamed, Executive Director of Amnes- Foreigners are overburdening South Africa's pub- ty International South Africa, warns that Motsoal- lic hospitals. This is what Aaron Motsoaledi, edi fuels xenophobia with such statements. Dep- South Africa’s then Health Minister, claimed in uty Public Protector Kevin Malunga tweeted that November 2018 when he spoke at the Nurses the Minister of Health's statements are aimed at Summit in Johannesburg. There, he discussed the deflecting from his own challenges regarding the challenges hospital staff face in their everyday health system. His tweet triggered a discussion in working life. In an interview with radio station the comments on whether or not foreign nation- SAfm, Motsoaledi blamed the country's immigra- als are responsible for overburdening the health tion policy for overburdening the healthcare system. system. 700 babies were born in May 2017 at Charlotte Maxeke Academic Hospital in Johan- The fact-checking organisation Africa Check con- nesburg, "and 400 of them were not South Afri- tacted the hospitals and checked the figures the can at all,” Motsoaledi said, for instance. Minister of Health quoted in the interview. Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung e. V. Regional report July 2019 2 The result: none of the figures quoted by Mot- ing that the worldwide growth of the fact- soaledi could be substantiated. Wrong infor- checking industry is also being experienced in mation circulating in public can cause great harm, Africa, the Duke Reporter Lab currently mentions depending on the topic. -
Challenges for Marxism and Anti-Racism
DEMOCRATIC MARXISM DEMOCRATIC MARXISM SERIES Series Editor: Vishwas Satgar The crisis of Marxism in the late twentieth century was the crisis of orthodox and van- guardist Marxism associated mainly with hierarchical communist parties, and imposed, even as state ideology, as the ‘correct’ Marxism. The Stalinisation of the Soviet Union and its eventual collapse exposed the inherent weaknesses and authoritarian mould of vanguardist Marxism. More fundamentally, vanguardist Marxism was rendered obsolete but for its residual existence in a few parts of the world, as well as within authoritarian national liberation movements in Africa and in China. With the deepening crises of capitalism, a new democratic Marxism (or democratic his- torical materialism) is coming to the fore. Such a democratic Marxism is characterised in the following ways: • Its sources span non-vanguardist grassroots movements, unions, political fronts, mass parties, radical intellectuals, transnational activist networks and parts of the progressive academy; • It seeks to ensure that the inherent categories of Marxism are theorised within constantly changing historical conditions to find meaning; • Marxism is understood as a body of social thought that is unfinished and hence challenged by the need to explain the dynamics of a globalising capitalism and the futures of social change; • It is open to other forms of anti-capitalist thought and practice, including cur- rents within radical ecology, feminism, emancipatory utopianism and indigenous thought; • It does not seek to be a monolithic and singular school of thought but engenders contending perspectives; • Democracy, as part of the heritage of people’s struggles, is understood as the basis for articulating alternatives to capitalism and as the primary means for con- stituting a transformative subject of historical change. -
Us Media Coverage of Africa: a Content
U.S. MEDIA COVERAGE OF AFRICA: A CONTENT ANALYSIS OF THE NEW YORK TIMES FROM 2003 TO 2007 By JOSHUA ADAM DANKER-DAKE Bachelor of Arts Oral Roberts University Tulsa, Oklahoma 2004 Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate College of the Oklahoma State University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE May, 2008 U.S. MEDIA COVERAGE OF AFRICA: A CONTENT ANALYSIS OF THE NEW YORK TIMES FROM 2003 TO 2007 Thesis Approved: Jami A. Fullerton Thesis Advisor Joey Senat Lori McKinnon A. Gordon Emslie Dean of the Graduate College ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Dr. Jami Fullerton, my advisor, gave me considerable guidance and assistance throughout this project. She was thoroughly supportive, and did much to shepherd this study along. Dr. Lori McKinnon and Dr. Joey Senat gave me plenty of input on this study, primarily in the form of constructive, fair, and eminently necessary (albeit sometimes harsh) criticism. Without their expertise, this study would be decidedly inferior. Dr. Stan Ketterer was of great help to me in dealing with the bureaucratic end of things – in keeping up on deadlines, in dealing with contacts in the Graduate College, and with shuttling paperwork back and forth between Tulsa and Stillwater. David Lange assisted me in coding the data for this study. Gratefully and sincerely, I thank you all for your time and efforts on my behalf. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter Page I. INTRODUCTION……………………………………………………………………....1 The Decline of Foreign Correspondence………………………………………….2 American Ignorance……………………………………………………………….3 The New York Times………………………………………………………………4 Theoretical Approach……………………………………………………………...5 Statement of the Problem………………………………………………………….6 Significance of the Study………………………………………………………….6 Methodology………………………………………………………………………6 Research Questions………………………………………………………………..7 Limitations………………………………………………………………………...7 Thesis Plan………………………………………………………………………...7 II. -
WEAPONS of MASS DISTRACTION: Foreign State-Sponsored Disinformation in the Digital Age
WEAPONS OF MASS DISTRACTION: Foreign State-Sponsored Disinformation in the Digital Age MARCH 2019 PARK ADVISORS | Weapons of Mass Distraction: Foreign State-Sponsored Disinformation in the Digital Age Authored by Christina Nemr and William Gangware Acknowledgements The authors are grateful to the following subject matter experts who provided input on early drafts of select excerpts: Dr. Drew Conway, Dr. Arie Kruglanski, Sean Murphy, Dr. Alina Polyakova, and Katerina Sedova. The authors also appreciate the contributions to this paper by Andrew Rothgaber and Brendan O’Donoghue of Park Advisors, as well as the editorial assistance provided by Rhonda Shore and Ryan Jacobs. This report was produced with support from the US Department of State’s Global Engagement Center. Any views expressed in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the US State Department, Park Advisors, or its subject matter expert consultants. Any errors contained in this report are the authors’ alone. PARK ADVISORS | Weapons of Mass Distraction: Foreign State-Sponsored Disinformation in the Digital Age 0. Table of Contents 01 Introduction and contextual analysis 04 How do we define disinformation? 06 What psychological factors drive vulnerabilities to disinformation and propaganda? 14 A look at foreign state-sponsored disinformation and propaganda 26 Platform-specific challenges and efforts to counter disinformation 39 Knowledge gaps and future technology challenges PARK ADVISORS | Weapons of Mass Distraction: Foreign State-Sponsored Disinformation in the Digital Age 1 Introduction and 1. contextual analysis On July 12, 2014, viewers of Russia’s main state-run television station, Channel One, were shown a horrific story. -
Advanced 2014 Key.Pages
Universidad Nacional de La Pampa - Facultad de Ciencias Humanas-SEREX ! Examen de Acreditación de Niveles de Lengua Inglesa 2014 Candidate’s Name .………...……………………………… DNI …………………………………………………………. Nivel: AVANZADO Paper: READING (1 h 15 min) ! A. Read the following text, adapted from http://voanews.com New Fact Checking Website Arrives JOHANNESBURG— The ‘facts’ in South Africa now have a kind of watchdog. Africa Check, a fledgling fact checking website, is attempting to pin down unfounded claims made by the country's leaders, media outlets along with widely held beliefs. There is a common claim in Johannesburg that it has the largest man-made forest in the world. It's easy to believe; the city has lush, green canopy that covers many neighborhoods. (1) But it's not true, according to Africa Check, which found that the largest man-made forest is actually in China, next to the Gobi desert. Debunking bogus claims, politically charged fictions and unfounded statements, Africa Check is a website that challenges media, politicians and the occasional social media celebrity when they massage the truth, or ignore it completely, said Julian Rademeyer, southern Africa editor for the site. "I think the fundamental element of our work is that we are trying to get people to question what they're told, what they read, what politicians say to them, and to look at what the information that is there and ask essentially what the fundamental question is 'Where is the evidence?' If someone makes a claim, where is the evidence to support that claim, and to actually interrogate those claims and not to accept things purely for what they are," Rademeyer said.