DOCSLIB.ORG

Paper Available

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Paper Available Killer Incentives: Awards, Status Competition, and Pilot Performance during World War II Philipp Ager Leonardo Bursztyn Hans-Joachim Voth* University of University of University of Southern Denmark Chicago & NBER Zurich Abstract. We examine the role of awards and of status competition in a high- stakes setting – aerial combat during during World War II. We collect and compile new, detailed data on monthly victory scores of over 5,000 German pilots for the period 1939-45. Our results suggest that awards may have been an important incentive. Crucially, we find evidence of status competition: When the daily bulletin of the German armed forces mentioned the accomplishments of a particular fighter pilots, his former peers perform markedly better. Outperformance is differential across skill groups. The best pilots try harder, score more, and die no more frequently when a former squadron peer is mentioned; average pilots try win only very few additional victories, but die at a markedly higher rate. Our results suggest that the incentive effects of non- financial rewards can lead to ambiguous results in settings where both risk and output affect aggregate performance. * Corresponding author ([email protected]). We are grateful to Jacob Miller and Lukas Leucht for outstanding research assistance. We thank David Card, Ernesto Dal Bó, David Dorn, Barry Eichengreen, Armin Falk, Ernst Fehr, Paul Gertler, Patrick Kline, Jonathan Leonard, Martha Olney, Christy Romer, Richard Sutch, Noam Yuchtman and Fabrizio Zilibotti for helpful comments, and seminar audiences at the Academy of Behavioral Economics, Haas Business School (UC Berkeley), the Economic History Seminar (UC Berkeley), and the Labor Lunch (UC Berkeley) for constructive criticisms. 2 I. INTRODUCTION Humans crave recognition. In the Theory of Moral Sentiments, Adam Smith defined “bettering our condition” as “to be observed, to be attended to, to be taken notice of with sympathy… and approbation.” From baseball’s Hall of Fame to the Congressional Medal of Honor, from the fellowships of scholarly societies to the employee-of-the-month award, symbolic rewards exploit the human need for approbation as a motivating force. By creating an artificial scarcity, awards are meant to spur effort and increase productivity (Besley and Ghatak 2008, Moldovanu et al. 2007). Both career concerns and a desire for reciprocity may be behind the incentive effects of symbolic awards (Fehr and Schmidt 1999; Dewatripont et al. 1999). On the whole, the empirical evidence suggests that non-pecuniary rewards work. Markham, Scott, and McKee (2002) demonstrate improved attendance after a public recognition program was introduced at a US firm. Chan et al. (2014) find that academics perform better after receiving prizes or prestigious fellowships. Kosfeld and Neckermann (2011) examine students working on a database project and show that they increase their performance if they are part of the group that can receive a congratulatory card for best performance.1 Ashraf et al. (2016) show that condom sales in Zambia can be promoted effectively by non-financial rewards.2 At the same time, “[a] medal glitters, but it also casts a shadow” (Winston Churchill). Competing for awards is similar to other forms of status competition, from conspicuous consumption to prominent donations (Veblen 1899; Glazer and Konrad 1996). Just like awards, these are a way to signal status and success. Competition for positional goods is zero-sum in nature, and may lead to lower satisfaction or excessive effort (Layard 2005, Frank 1999). The overall effects of competing for symbolic awards may also be ambiguous: They may crowd in effort, giving rise to social multiplier effects, or they may crowd them out. Effects could depend on relative rank or the level of innate skill. While some theoretical work takes the zero- sum nature of symbolic rewards into account (Besley and Ghatak 2008; Moldovanu et al. 2007; Frey 2007; ), there is little empirical work on the social dimension of awards and their potential effect on others in the organization.3 In this paper, we examine the performance of German fighter pilots during World War II. These include the highest-scoring aces of all time. Fighter pilots constitute an ideal setting for analyzing the effects of awards – the stakes are high, awards were almost entirely symbolic, and principal-agent problems are strong. This is a 1 Neckermann et al. (2014) demonstrate a positive effect of awards for voluntary work behaviours on core productivity in a call center. 2 In contrast is Malmendier and Tate (2009), who show that superstar CEOs significantly underperform after receiving major awards. 3 Notable exceptions include Ashraf et al. (2014), who find that explicit rankings undermine effort, while awards increase them. 3 favourable setting compared to existing research symbolic awards, which are typically laboratory based or occur in a setting with easily observable effort and low stakes. In single-engine fighters, pilots operate alone; once battle is joined, there is no effective control of individual planes by superior officers. Each man had to decide when to pursue victory or break off contact. A pilot’s number of sorties in a day was as much determined by combat conditions as by ‘fighting spirit’. In such a setting, individual motivation was key: Germany’s most decorated pilot during World War II was Hans-Ulrich Rudel. He completed 2,500 missions, destroying over 500 Russian tanks and three capital ships in the process. Rudel insisted on flying continuously until the end of the war despite having a leg amputated, and despite being ordered by Hitler himself to stop flying and transfer to a training school (Rudel 1949). Awards were also purely symbolic, consisting of medals worth only pennies. Medals did not come with financial rewards nor did they automatically lead to promotion with higher rates of pay.4 The German armed forces operated an elaborate system of awards and medals. The main ones – the Knight’s Crosses – were awarded cumulatively, with each lower award being a requisite for the next step on the ladder. Personal valor in the face of the enemy was a key consideration; privates, NCOs and officers had similiar chances to be recognized, and there were almost no awards for ‘desk warriors’ (Van Creveld 1980). Recipients of the Knight’s Cross were widely considered heroes, starred on the front pages of magazines, and were frequently asked for autographs, or to tour the ‘home front’ to boost morale. Military hierarchy was partly inverted for recipients – officers had to salute a Knight’s Cross holders first, even if a mere private was wearing the medal. While the symbolic value was high, so were the stakes involved in aerial combat – by spring 1944, fully a quarter of Luftwaffe pilots became casualties every month.5 The vast majority of German fighter pilots serving in World War II was shot down and died. We first examine the effects of awards and of public recognition on the performance of recipients. Pilots scored more victories in the run-up to receiving an award, and then went back to their earlier performance level. These effects were carefully taken into account by the air force leadership. Germany began the war with an established system of awards. After the massive successes against France and initially, against the Soviet Union, many aces already held the top award – the Knight’s Cross. To keep pilots motivated, and after much pressure from the Luftwaffe especially, the German armed forces introduced new medals: the Oak Leaves to the Knight’s Cross, 4 Pilots typically did not want to be promoted, for fear of being given a desk job. The air force was careful to not ‘reward’ its best pilots by promotion and an effective transfer to administrative duty. 5 In the first six months of 1944, the Luftwaffe lost 250% of its fighter strength – i.e. without new planes arriving from the factories, it would have found itself without planes very quickly. Loss rates for planes were higher than for pilots since many pilots crash-landed or parachuted to safety, even when their plane had been completely destroyed. 4 the Swords, and the Diamonds.6 This is in line with the predictions from models of fashion cycles, where the status value of high-end products continuously are devalued as they are adopted by more and more people – to which the optimal response requires the introduction of a new, “superior” product (Pesendorfer 1995). Our data also allows us to examine how the social dimension of awards shaped their effects. While a priori, status competition could sharpen or dull incentives, there is ample anecdotal evidence that it was a key motivating force. For example, during the Battle of Britain in the summer of 1940, two German pilots – Adolf Galland and Werner Mölders – were neck-and-neck in terms of total victories. When Mölders was ordered to confer with the head of the Luftwaffe, Hermann Göring, he went to Berlin for three days of meetings – but on the condition that Galland would also be grounded for the same number of days. Remarkably, at a time when the air battle against Britain hung in the balance, Göring (himself a WWI fighter ace) accepted that one of his top-scoring pilots would be grounded gratuitously. Combining data on social distance in pre-existing networks with the timing of awards, we show that public recognition actually crowded in effort: Peers of pilots who were publicly recognized tried harder, increasing their score of aerial victories significantly during the months in question. This is particularly true among the best pilots (i.e., those more likely to be successful in being publicly recognized after they tried harder), and of those who were closest in terms of social distance to the pilot receiving the award. Pilots who had flown in the same squadron in the past as the new award holder upped their score by a lot; those who had only served on the same airbase, by a little.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • One of the Enjoyable Aspects of Pilot Counters to Give Missions Historical
    One of the enjoyable aspects of Galland, Adolph wanted more bombers; where RISE OF THE LUFTWAFFE and (Bf.109: P, H, Bu, A; Me.262: A, CV, P, Bu) Galland wanted to create a central EIGHTH AIR FORCE is using One of the most famous of all the fighter defense for protecting pilot counters to give missions Luftwaffe pilots, Adolph Galland Germany from Allied bombers, historical color. To many players, was a product of the "secret" Goring wanted a peripheral one. defeating a named ace is an event Luftwaffe of the 1930's, flying his Towards the end of the war worth celebrating. However, first combat missions over Spain Galland would repeatedly con while some of the pilots included in 1937 and 1938. He started serve his meager fighter forces for in the games are familiar to flying up to four sorties a day in telling blows upon the Allies, anyone with a passing interest in WW II in an antiquated Hs.123 only to have Hitler order them World War II (e.g. Bader, Galland, ground support aircraft during into premature and ineffective Yeager), most are much less the invasion of Poland, earning offensives. Galland also had to known. This is the first in a series the Iron Cross, Second Class. defend the pilots under his of articles by myself and other Without a victory at the end of the command from repeated defama authors which provide back campaign, he used trickery and a tion at the hands of Hitler, Goring ground information on the pilots sympathetic doctor to get himself and the German propaganda of the Down in Flames series.
    [Show full text]
  • UK Secretary of State for Defence Ben Wallace Discusses Strategic Priorities
    American Enterprise Institute Web event — UK Secretary of State for Defence Ben Wallace discusses strategic priorities Introduction: Mackenzie Eaglen, Senior Fellow, AEI Remarks: Ben Wallace, Secretary of State for Defence, UK Ministry of Defence Discussion: Mackenzie Eaglen, Senior Fellow, AEI Ben Wallace, Secretary of State for Defence, UK Ministry of Defence Tuesday, July 13, 2021 12:00–1:00 p.m. Event page: https://www.aei.org/events/uk-secretary-of-state-for-defence-ben- wallace-discusses-strategic-priorities/ Mackenzie Eaglen: Good afternoon. Welcome to the American Enterprise Institute’s live web event on the strategic priorities for the United States and the United Kingdom. My name is Mackenzie Eaglen. I’m a resident fellow here on national security and military budget issues. It’s an honor and a privilege to be joined today by the United Kingdom’s Secretary of State for Defence Ben Wallace. We’re coming to you from the AEI library today here in Washington, DC. And it’s remarkable to meet again in person, sir, after so long of a break. The Right Hon. Ben Wallace MP was appointed secretary of state for defense in July of 2019. He started his career in the British army, commissioning from the Royal Military Academy Sandhurst, and saw active service in Northern Ireland, Germany, Cyprus, and Central America. He was mentioned in dispatches while on operations in the 1990s. After leaving the army, Secretary Wallace joined the aerospace company QinetiQ, where he gained experience in the defense industry writ large. He first entered politics in 1999 as a member of the Scottish parliament before being elected to the UK House of Parliament in 2005.
    [Show full text]
  • Erich Hartmann " Erich Hartmann, the Poetry of Daily Life " March 21 - May 4Th 2019
    Catherine & André Hug present : Carte blanche à CLAIRbyKahnGallery Erich Hartmann " Erich Hartmann, the Poetry of Daily Life " March 21 - May 4th 2019 Galerie Catherine et André Hug 40, rue de Seine / 2, rue de l’Échaudé 75006 Paris www.galeriehug.com Mardi au samedi : 11h à 13h et 14h30 à 19h The Kiss,©ErichHartmann/MagnumPhotos/CLAIRbyKahn The Erich Hartmann, The Poetry of Daily Life exhibition emerged from a chance meeting and an immediate enchantment. The meeting was between Anna-Patricia Kahn, who is the director of CLAIRbyKahn, and Catherine and André Hug, who are the renowned owners of their eponymous gallery in Paris. And the enchantment took place the instant Catherine and André were shown the Erich Hartmann oeuvre. Then and there, they decided to give a "carte blanche" for a Hartmann show to CLAIRbyKahn, the gallery which represents the photographer’s archives. Hartmann (b. 1922 in Munich, d. 1999 in New York) is celebrated for the subtle, mysterious poetry that emanates from his photography, the play of shadow and light that is captivating yet respectful. He embraced places, objects, and people with his camera, never unsettling the moment, always capturing it in a way that allowed it to be rediscovered. The Poetry of Daily Life exhibition features 27 images by Hartmann that magnify the glory of the ordinary and the dignity of the routine. The photographs on display are all vintage prints that have the unique quality of being developed by Hartmann’s own hand. This will be a momentous year for the Erich Hartmann archives as there will also be two major museum exhibitions consecrated to the legendary photographer: in Bale, Switzerland from February to July 2019 as part of a collective exhibition Isrealities; and then in November 2019, his Irish portfolio will be exhibited at the National Gallery of Ireland in Dublin.
    [Show full text]
  • Honours and Awards- ANZAC Day
    Honours and Awards- ANZAC Day Today I will talk about the Honours and Awards that have been received by people who have lived in the District. 21 people who have lived in Mt Marshal have received various awards. The highest award available is the Victoria Cross. This is awarded for Valour. The next highest is the Distinguished Conduct Medal. This is regarded as an extremely high level award. It is awarded for gallantry in the field. There are three recipients of the DCM who have lived in the District. Two are buried in the Bencubbin Cemetery. The next highest awards are the Military Cross and the Military Medal. 12 people have been awarded these medals. The Military Medal is awarded for bravery in battle, acts of gallantry and devotion to duty under fire. The next medal is the Meritorious Service Medal. There have been three people with this award in the District. This medal can be awarded for meritorious service or gallantry. The last imperial award is the Mentioned in Dispatches. This requires having a noteworthy action published in the London or Commonwealth Gazette. There is no medal involved. The recipient receives a certificate. A bronze oak leave is sown on the campaign medal ribbon. There have been three recipients of this award There have been three foreign awards received: Two Belgium Croix de Guerres and one United States Silver Star. All of these medals were awarded during World War One except one Military Medal and the US Silver Star. These two medals were awarded during the Vietnam War. The three Citations for the DCMs follow: Cpl AG Forrester: “For conspicuous gallantry and devotion to duty whilst in charge of a stretcher bearer squad during an attack.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Canadians in the Air, 1914–1919, 1939–1945
    Canadians in the Air, 1914–1919, 1939–1945 Paul Goranson Anchoring the Kite cwm 19710261-3180 Beaverbrook Collection of War Art Canadian War Museum warmuseum.ca/learn Canadians in the Air 1 Canadians in the Air, 1914–1919, 1939–1945 Introduction Large-scale military aviation began with the First World War, not long after the 1909 flight of the Silver Dart marked the start of aviation in Canada. As no Canadian Air Force yet existed, thousands of Canadians fought the First World War in British flying units. Canadians first served with the Royal Flying Corps (rfc) or with the Royal Naval Air Service (rnas). These two services amalgamated on 1 April 1918 into the Royal Air Force (raf). In total, an estimated 13,000–22,000 individuals from Canada joined the British flying services. In 1924, the Royal Canadian Air Force (rcaf) was created. With the outbreak of war in September 1939, the rcaf was able to draw on an existing cadre of officers and airmen and also attracted experienced personnel from private enterprise. By 1945, close to 250,000 men and women had served in the rcaf at home and abroad. This guide will illustrate the process of researching an individual’s service, from the essential starting point of service documents to supporting resources for detail and further discovery. Helpful hint See lac’s Military Abbreviations used in Service Files page. warmuseum.ca/learn Canadians in the Air 2 Photo album of Flight Lieutenant William Burt Bickell, Royal Air Force cwm 19850379-001_p14 George Metcalf Archival Collection Canadian War Museum First World War, 1914–1919 While some recruitment and training were done Royal Flying Corps: For airmen who died or were in Canada, the flying services were British in discharged before 1 April 1918, their service records organization, administration, and operation.
    [Show full text]
  • Unit I Spiral Exam – World War II (75 Points Total) PLEASE DO NO
    Mr. Huesken 10th Grade United States History II Unit I Spiral Exam – World War II (75 points total) PLEASE DO NO WRITE ON THIS TEST DIRECTIONS – Please answer the following multiple-choice questions with the best possible answer. No answer will be used more than once. (45 questions @ 1 point each = 45 points) 1) All of the following were leaders of totalitarian governments in the 1930’s and 1940’s except: a. Joseph Stalin b. Francisco Franco. c. Benito Mussolini d. Neville Chamberlain. 2) In what country was the Fascist party and government formed? a. Italy b. Japan c. Spain d. Germany 3) The Battle of Britain forced Germany to do what to their war plans in Europe in 1942? a. Join the Axis powers. b. Fight a three-front war. c. Put off the invasion of Britain. d. Enter into a nonaggression pact with Britain. 4) The Nazis practiced genocide toward Jews, Gypsies, and other “undesirable” peoples in Europe. What does the term “genocide” mean? a. Acting out of anti-Semitic beliefs. b. Deliberate extermination of a specific group of people. c. Terrorizing of the citizens of a nation by a government. d. Killing of people for the express purpose of creating terror. 5) The term “blitzkrieg” was a military strategy that depended on what? a. A system of fortifications. b. Out-waiting the opponent. c. Surprise and quick, overwhelming force. d. The ability to make a long, steady advance. 6) In an effort to avoid a second “world war”, when did the Britain and France adopt a policy of appeasement toward Germany? a.
    [Show full text]
  • German Argonne (XVI) Corps End of June 1915
    German Argonne (XVI) Corps End of June 1915 Commanding General: General der Infanterie von Murdra Chief of staff: Major Freiherr von Esebeck 34th Division: Generallieutenant von Heineman 68th Brigade: Oberst von von Sydow 1/,2/,3/67th Infantry Regiment (6 German MGs) 1/,2/,3/145th Infantry Regiment (6 German & 4 French MGs) 86th Brigade: Generalmajor Teetzmann 1/,2/,3/30th Infantry Regiment (6 German MGs) 1/,2/,3/173rd Infantry Regiment (6 German & 3 French MGs) Cavalry: 14th Uhlan Regiment (3 sqns) 34th Artillery Brigade: Generalmajor Oberst von Crüger 1/,2/69th Field Artillery Regiment 1st Bn (3 btrys, each with 4 77mm guns) 2nd Bn (3 btrys, each with 4 105mm howitzers) 1/,2/70th Field Artillery Regiment 1st Bn (3 btrys, each with 4 77mm guns) 2nd Bn (3 btrys, each with 4 77mm guns) Other: 2nd & 3rd Cos., Pioneer Battalion 34th Divisional Bridging Train Staff/16th PIoneer Regiment 2nd Medical Company 33rd Division: Generallieutenant Freiherr von Lüttwitz 66th Brigade: Generalmajor Freinerr von Speszhardt 1/,2/,3/,4/98th Infantry Regiment (? number German machine guns) 1/,2/,3/,4/130th Infantry Regiment (6 German & 2 French machine guns) 67th Brigade: ü 1/,2/,3/135th Infantry Regiment (2 machine gun companies, each with 6 MGs) 1/,2/,3/144th Infantry Regiment (6 German machine guns) Cavalry: 12th Jäger zu Pferd Regiment (2 sqns) 33rd Artillery Brigade: Oberst Freiherr von La Chevallerie 1/,2/33rd Field Artillery Regiment 1st Bn - 3 btrys 4 105mm howitzers each 2nd Bn - 3 btrys, 4 75mm guns each 1/,2/34th Field Artillery Regiment 1st &
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to The
    Guide to the St. Martin WWI Photographic Negative Collection 1914-1918 7.2 linear feet Accession Number: 66-98 Collection Number: FW66-98 Arranged by Jack McCracken, Ken Rice, and Cam McGill Described by Paul A. Oelkrug July 2004 Citation: The St. Martin WWI Photographic Negative Collection, FW66-98, Box number, Photograph number, History of Aviation Collection, Special Collections Department, McDermott Library, The University of Texas at Dallas. Special Collections Department McDermott Library, The University of Texas at Dallas Revised 8/20/04 Table of Contents Additional Sources ...................................................................................................... 3 Series Description ....................................................................................................... 3 Scope and Content ...................................................................................................... 4 Provenance Statement ................................................................................................. 4 Literary Rights Statement ........................................................................................... 4 Note to the Researcher ................................................................................................ 4 Container list ............................................................................................................... 5 2 Additional Sources Ed Ferko World War I Collection, George Williams WWI Aviation Archives, The History of Aviation Collection,
    [Show full text]
  • Henry Grace DCM Sergeant 6830, 1St Battalion Oxfordshire and Buckinghamshire Light Infantry
    Henry Grace DCM Sergeant 6830, 1st Battalion Oxfordshire and Buckinghamshire Light Infantry. Henry Grace was born in 1885 and baptised on 21 July in Amersham. He was the eldest son of Thomas and Frances Fanny Grace, formerly Eggleton, living at Washington Row, Amersham. Thomas was a general farm labourer but had previously served in the 10th Hussars during the Afghan and Egyptian Campaigns 1878 – 1880. His five sons all served in H.M.Forces during the 1914-18 war. Henry enlisted as a private in the regular army of the 1st Oxfordshire and Buckinghamshire Light Infantry (OBLI) in 1901, in High Wycombe. His occupation was recorded as gardener’s labourer. At the time of the 1911 Census he was a Lance Corporal serving with the military in India. The 1st Battalion OBLI was part of the 17th Brigade, 6th Poona Division, and left India for Mesopotamia (now Iraq) in November 1914. There, the Battalion took part in the campaign against the Ottoman forces that ruled the country. Henry’s Medal Roll Index card showed that he entered the Asiatic theatre of war on 5 December 1914. In December Henry was mentioned in dispatches and nine months later, after promotion to a sergeant, he was awarded the Distinguished Conduct Medal for conspicuous gallantry at Kut-al-Amara (Mesopotamia). On the 28th September 1915, he sent messages to the artillery by heliograph under heavy fire, although he had to stand in full view of the enemy’s redoubts to do so. The British had taken Kut and advanced towards Baghdad but were stopped at Ctesiphon and forced to retreat.
    [Show full text]
  • Medical Recipients of the Victoria Cross During The
    ORIGINAL ARTICLES 8. Crawforo ES. Bomberger RA. Glaeser OH. et al. Ao_iliac occlusive disease. Factors influencing. survival and function following reronstructi.ve operation over a 2>year period. Surgery 1981; 90: HISTORY OF MEDICIl'iE 1055-1067. 11I.. 9. Nevelsteen A. Wourers L. Suv R. Aortofemoral Dacron reconstruction for aorto-iliac occlusive disease. A25-year survey. E';" JVase Su')I 1991; S, 179-186. 10. Reddy E. Robbs jY, Human RR. Rajaruthnam P. Early results of aortobifemoral bypass - a comparison between Black and wlUte patients. S AIr JSu')I 1982; 2ft 283-288. MEDICAL RECIPIENTS OF THE 11. Seftel He The rarity of coronary heart disease in South African blacks. S AIr Med J1978; ~ 9'J. 105. 12. Seeda. YK. Maye! FGH. Khan S. et al. Risk factors for coronary heart disease in the Indians of VICTORIA CROSS DURING THE Durban. S AIr Med J1990; 78, 447-454. 13. Seedat Yl<. Mayet FGH. Gouws E. Risk factors for coronary heart disease in the white ANGLO-BOER WAR, 1899 -1902 community in Durban. S AIr Med J1994; ~ 257·262. 14. Clarke RJ, Provan JL The Surgical treatment of aorto-iliac occlusion Br JSurg 1969; 56:: ~2.55. 15. Darling RC, Brewster DC, Hallet ]W, Darling RC ill. Aorta-iliac reconsl:ruction. SUTg CIin North Am 1979; 5~ 565-580. JC de Villiers, CV Small 16. Talkington CM. Thompson JE. Prevention and management of infected prostheses. Surg Clin North Am 1982; 6Z, 515-530. 17. Robbs jY, Reddy E, Ray R Antibiotic prophylaxis in aortic and peripheral arterial surgery in the presence of infected extremity lesions.
    [Show full text]
  • A Guide to Researching First World War Military Family History
    Norfolk Cultural Services First World War Research Guide A Guide to Researching First World War Military Family History What you can find at Norfolk Library and Information Service, Norfolk Record Office and the Royal Norfolk Regimental Museum 1 Norfolk Cultural Services First World War Research Guide Contents: Section Page Introduction 3 One Starting your research with Norfolk Library and Information Service 5 A guide to tracing family history 5 A guide to tracing military information 11 Two How Norfolk Record Office can help 15 Case Study: What can be found online 17 Adding to your story with local archives 25 Three What you can access at the Royal Norfolk Regimental Museum 29 Background information on the Norfolk Regiment 32 Information on the Norfolk Regiment in our collection 34 Information on each battalion in our collection 35 List of books and printed resources held at the RNRM 41 Useful websites 47 Contact information 50 2 Norfolk Cultural Services First World War Research Guide Introduction The centenary of the First World War has inspired many people to look back and trace those who served during 1914 – 1918. This guide shows how Norfolk Cultural Services can help researchers use and interpret online and archival resources to find out more information about individuals in the First World War. The first section gives an introduction to starting your research with the library. It highlights which helpful books are available for loan, and how to take advantage of Norfolk Library and Information Service’s subscription to the Ancestry website. This section also advises on other places and websites to start your search.
    [Show full text]
  • Barrett Tillman
    IN AThe killsDAY and claims ACE of the top shooters BY BARRETT TILLMAN n the morning of April 7, 1943, American Great War air warriors fi ghter pilots on Guadalcanal in the Solomon Probably the fi rst ace in a day was Austro-Hungarian Stabsfeld- Islands responded to a red alert. More than webel Julius Arigi. On August 22, 1916, with his gunner 100 Japanese aircraft were inbound, sending Feldwebel Johann Lassi, he intercepted Italian aircraft over Wildcats and P-40s scrambling to inter- Albania’s Adriatic coast. The Austrians cept. In a prolonged combat, the de- downed fi ve Farman two-seaters, fenders claimed 39 victories and actu- destroyed or abandoned on the ally got 29—a better than normal ratio water. However, a single-seater of actual kills versus claims. The belle pilot contributed to two of the Oof the brawl was 1st Lt. James E. Swett, a 22-year-old victories. Arigi ended the war as Marine entering his fi rst combat. Fifteen minutes later, Austria’s second-ranking ace with he was fi shed out of the bay, having ditched his shot-up 32 victories. F4F-4 perforated by Japanese and American gunfi re. Almost certainly, the fi rst pilot downing fi ve opponents unaided in one day occurred during April 1917. Though wearing glasses, Leutnant Fritz Otto Bernert became a fi ghter pilot. During “Bloody April” he was on a roll, accounting for 15 of Jasta Boelcke’s 21 victories. On the 24th, the day after receiving the Pour le Merite, he led an Alba- tros patrol.
    [Show full text]