DOCSLIB.ORG

Brian Jay Corrigan 27.1.2010.Proofed

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Brian Jay Corrigan 27.1.2010.Proofed 7 The Repertoire of the Renaissance Playing Companies Brian Jay Corrigan INTRODUCTION In the process of a decades-long labor of love I call The Compendium of Renaissance Drama, I have been able, perhaps for the first time, to create several comprehensive lists of extant plays in their original settings. Several years ago one such series of lists, covering playhouses and their repertoires, appeared in Discoveries, and I offer now another series of lists indicating playing companies and their repertoires. This compendium is now online at cord.ung.edu. These lists are a comprehensive reflection of the place of extant plays in the repertoires of the various playing companies, adult and children, from the time of Westminster’s Boys (1564) until the closing of the theatres in 1642. Company histories are taken from Gurr and from my own notes to be found also online in the Compendium of Renaissance Drama. Companies are listed alphabetically while the plays are listed below each company chronologically. The dates listed are keyed to Harbage and Schoenbaum’s Annals and are therefore only approximate. A question mark before an entry indicates there is debate over whether the company in question performed that play. A question mark after a date indicates doubt that the play in question was performed at or around that date. The note [later] indicates that the play is known or thought to have been performed by that company but in a year sometime after its original production. The following lists will contain repetitions where a play is known or strongly suspected to have been performed by more than one company. 7 Discoveries 27.1 (2010): 7-32 8 I. ADULT COMPANY REPERTOIRES THE ADMIRAL’S MEN The Admiral’s Men date from 1585. It was in 1585 that their patron, Charles Howard, second baron Howard of Effingham (1536–1624), was appointed Lord High Admiral. He was first cousin to Anne Boleyn and married Elizabeth’s cousin and confidante, Katherine Carey. The company he patronized inhabited various playhouses in succession: the Theatre, Newington Butts, Rose, and Fortune. Their business practice is well chronicled thanks to Philip Henslowe’s Diary, a diurnal account of the company and its players. Discovery in 1989 of the western three- quarters of the company’s most famous playhouse, the Rose, has enhanced modern understanding of this company. In 2002 the remaining eastern portion was also uncovered, making the Rose the only playhouse foundation from the period to have been entirely unearthed. The Admiral’s Company’s chief actor was Henslowe’s step son–in–law, Edward “Ned” Alleyn. The company technically changed its name to Nottingham’s Men when in 1597 Charles Howard earned that title. Nevertheless, modern prejudice favors the title Admiral’s Men from 1585 to 1603 when players came under the purview of the Royal Household and the company patronage was assumed by the Stuart heir apparent, Prince Henry. See also Prince Henry’s Men and Palsgrave’s (Palatine’s) Men. After fire destroyed their playhouse, the Fortune, in 1621–and after it was rebuilt in 1623–the remnants of the company merged with the King and Queen of Bohemia’s Men in 1626. PLAYS The Spanish Tragedy (1587) 1 Tamburlaine (1587) The Two Angry Women of Abington (1588) The Wounds of Civil War, or Marius and Scilla (1588) The Battle of Alcazar (1589) 2 Tamburlaine (1589) ? John a Kent and John a Cumber (1589) The Dead Man’s Fortune (1590) [later] Doctor Faustus (1592) 8 Discoveries 27.1 (2010): 7-32 9 A Knack to Know an Honest Man (1594) ? Two Lamentable Tragedies (1594) I Tamar Cam (1596) A Tale of a Tub (1596/1633) The Blind Beggar of Alexandria (Irus) (1596) Captain Thomas Stukeley (1596) Frederick and Basilea (1597) An Humorous Day’s Mirth (1597) The Downfall of Robert, Earl of Huntingdon (1 Robin Hood) (1598) The Death of Robert, Earl of Huntingdon (2 Robin Hood) (1598) Englishmen for my Money, or A Woman Will Have Her Will (1598) Look About You (1599) Old Fortunatus (1599) The Shoemaker’s Holiday (1599) 1 Sir John Oldcastle (1599) Troilus and Cressida (1599) 1 The Blind Beggar of Bednal Green (1 Tom Stroud) (1600) The Four Prentices of London (1600) Patient Grissil (1600) The Spanish Moor’s Tragedy (1600) ? Lust’s Dominion, or The Lascivious Queen (1600) ? The Devil and His Dame (1600) 2 Fortune’s Tennis (1602) Hoffman, or A Revenge for a Father (1602) ? The Family of Love (1602) ?The Noble Spanish Soldier (The Noble Soldier, or A Contract Broken Justly Revenged) (1626) AMATEURS AT COURT The Queen of Aragon (Cleodora) (1640) AMATEURS AT SURRENDEN Henry IV (1623) THE CHAMBERLAIN’S MEN Henry Carey, Lord Hunsdon, sponsored a company between 1564 and 1566. It is not until 1576 that they appear again. They 9 Discoveries 27.1 (2010): 7-32 10 played in York 8 September 1580 and appeared in court 27 December 1582. Sussex, Lord Chamberlain, died in 1583. The title Lord Chamberlain passed first to Charles Howard (Lord Effingham and later Lord Admiral) before it passed to his father-in-law Henry Carey in July 1585. In this role, Carey supported the Queen’s Men as the only court playing company until 1594 when the Lord Chamberlain’s Men came into being. PLAYS [later] The Two Gentlemen of Verona (1593) ? The Taming of the Shrew (1594) [later] Love’s Labours Lost (1595) Richard II (1595) ? Romeo and Juliet (1595) ? Sir Thomas More (fragment) (1595) A Midsummer Night’s Dream (1596) King John (1596) The Merchant of Venice (1596) 1 Henry IV (1597) 2 Henry IV (1597) Every Man in His Humor (1598) Much Ado About Nothing (1598) As You Like It (1599) Henry V (1599) Julius Caesar (1599) A Larum for London, or The Siege of Antwerp (1599) A Warning for Fair Women (1599) The Merry Wives of Windsor (1600) Twelfth Night, or What You Will (1600) Thiomas Lord Cromwell (1600) Hamlet (1601) Satiromastix, or The Untrussing of the Humorous Poet (1601) All’s Well That Ends Well (1602) Merry Devil of Edmonton (1602) Troilus and Cressida (1602) ? Timon of Athens [1607] 10 Discoveries 27.1 (2010): 7-32 11 DERBY’S MEN Ferdinando, Lord Strange, had a company of players dating back to the 1570s. By 1591 Lord Strange’s Men, gave an unprecedented six performances at court during the 1591-92 season. They went to the Rose in 1592, where one of their members, Edward Alleyn, married Henslowe’s daughter. This may have been in part responsible for their stay at the Rose for five months from February to June 1592–perhaps the longest single tenure for a company at a single playhouse to that date. In September 1593, Fernando Stanley succeeded his brother as earl of Derby. This is when the company became Derby’s Men. He died, however, 16 April 1594. After that time, the earl’s widow took charge of the players, and we have a record of them performing under her name on 16 May 1594. By then, however, the original Derby company had been greatly subsumed into the Chamberlain’s and Admiral’s companies. PLAY The Rare Triumphs of Love and Fortune (1582) 2 DERBY’S MEN After the death of Ferdinando Stanley, Lord Strange, fifth earl of Derby, (16 April 1594) the first Derby company seems to have been subsumed into the Chamberlain’s and Admiral’s companies. Derby’s widow sponsored what was probably a remnant or entirely new company at Winchester only a month later on 16 May 1594. The sixth earl of Derby, as with all the Stanleys before him, was a keen play fancier and sponsored the Second Derby’s company. He apparently even busied himself in June 1599 with “penning comedyes for the common players” (Peter Thomson, Shakespeare’s Career (Cambridge, 1992) p. 46). The Second Derby company apparently began as a provincial touring company. By 1599 they presented the first true competition to the ‘duopoly’ of the Chamberlain’s and Admiral’s players. They performed at court in February 1600 and twice in January 1601. Under the leadership of Robert Browne, the second Derby company tried to gain 11 Discoveries 27.1 (2010): 7-32 12 purchase of the London theatre world. They were under stiff competition from Worcester’s Men, and the two companies platooned between the Rose and Boar’s Head playhouses. By 1602, however, the Worcester’s company, strengthened by a merger with Oxford’s Men, gained complete possession of the Boar’s Head, though they soon left it for the Rose. Derby’s appears to have failed quickly after that, going into the provinces and disappearing from the record within two years. PLAYS [IN 1618?] Guy Earl of Warwick (1593) 1 Edward IV (1599) 2 Edward IV (1599) The Trial of Chivalry (The Gallant Cavaiero Dick Bowyer (1601) HENRIETTA’S MAIDS L’Artenice (Les Bergeries. The Queen’s Pastoral) (1626) KING’S MEN When James I decreed all playing companies come under royal sponsorship, he took over the former Lord Chamberlain’s Men himself. In 1603 the King’s Men owned a four-year-old playhouse, the Globe, and some of its members held the paper on another playhouse, the second Blackfriars. In 1608 the Blackfriars property ceased to be a children’s venue and reverted to the King’s Men. On 29 June 1613 the Globe amphitheatre burned to the ground during a performance of Shakespeare and Fletcher’s All is True (Henry VIII). The playhouse was quickly rebuilt and reopened in 1614, suggesting the financial strength or at least the popularity of the company.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Shakespeare's Elizabethan Public
    University of Louisville ThinkIR: The University of Louisville's Institutional Repository Electronic Theses and Dissertations 1-1925 Shakespeare's Elizabethan public. Joseph Anderson Burns University of Louisville Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.library.louisville.edu/etd Recommended Citation Burns, Joseph Anderson, "Shakespeare's Elizabethan public." (1925). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. Paper 182. https://doi.org/10.18297/etd/182 This Master's Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by ThinkIR: The University of Louisville's Institutional Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ThinkIR: The University of Louisville's Institutional Repository. This title appears here courtesy of the author, who has retained all other copyrights. For more information, please contact [email protected]. UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE SHAKESPEARE'S ELIZABETHAN PUBLIC A Dissertation SUbm! tted to the Faculty Of the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts Department of English By Joseph Anderson Burns 1925. 7 Of all the arts drama is the most democratic. Other forms of artistic and aesthebic expression, literature, music, painting, may be cultivated in solitude. not so the drama. It is demanded by the public; produced for the public nd unless it is ~pproved by the public ito doom is certain. r/hy it; is that the drama can- not at any time break away from the .t.."as ...• es, prejudices, and ide 1 of the public for which it s written, M. Edelstand Du · eril has 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Download
    Early Theatre 9.2 Issues in Review Lucy Munro, Anne Lancashire, John Astington, and Marta Straznicky Popular Theatre and the Red Bull Governing the Pen to the Capacity of the Stage: Reading the Red Bull and Clerkenwell In his introduction to Early Theatre’s Issues in Review segment ‘Reading the Elizabethan Acting Companies’, published in 2001, Scott McMillin called for an approach to the study of early modern drama which takes theatre companies as ‘the organizing units of dramatic production’. Such an approach will, he suggests, entail reading plays ‘more fully than we have been trained to do, taking them not as authorial texts but as performed texts, seeing them as collaborative endeavours which involve the writers and dozens of other theatre people, and placing the staged plays in a social network to which both the players and audiences – perhaps even the playwrights – belonged’.1 We present here a variation on this approach: three essays that focus on the Red Bull theatre and its Clerkenwell locality. Rather than focusing on individual companies, we take the playhouse and location as our organising principle. Nonetheless, we are dealing with precisely the kind of decentring activity that McMillin had in mind, examining early drama through collaborative performance, through performance styles and audience taste, and through the presentation of a theatrical repertory in print. Each essay deals with a different ‘social network’: Anne Lancashire re-examines the evidence for the London Clerkenwell play, a multi-day biblical play performed by clerks in the late fourteenth and early fifteenth centuries; John Astington takes a look at acting traditions and repertory composition at the Red Bull and its fellow in the northern suburbs, Golden Lane’s Fortune playhouse; and Marta Straznicky looks at questions relating to the audience for Red Bull plays in the playhouse and the print-shop.
    [Show full text]
  • M a K in G a N D U N M a K in Gin Early Modern English Drama
    Porter MAKING AND Chloe Porter UNMAKING IN EARLY MODERN ENGLISH DRAMA Why are early modern English dramatists preoccupied with unfinished processes of ‘making’ and ‘unmaking’? And what did ‘finished’ or ‘incomplete’ mean for spectators of plays and visual works in this period? Making and unmaking in early IN EARLY MODERN ENGLISH DRAMA IN EARLY UNMAKING AND MAKING modern English drama is about the prevalence and significance of visual things that are ‘under construction’ in early modern plays. Contributing to challenges to the well-worn narrative of ‘iconophobic’ early modern English culture, it explores the drama as a part of a lively post-Reformation visual world. Interrogating the centrality of concepts of ‘fragmentation’ and ‘wholeness’ in critical approaches to this period, it opens up new interpretations of the place of aesthetic form in early modern culture. An interdisciplinary study, this book argues that the idea of ‘finish’ had transgressive associations in the early modern imagination. It centres on the depiction of incomplete visual practices in works by playwrights including Shakespeare, John Lyly, and Robert Greene. The first book of its kind to connect dramatists’ attitudes to the visual with questions of materiality, Making and Unmaking in Early Modern English Drama draws on a rich range of illustrated examples. Plays are discussed alongside contexts and themes, including iconoclasm, painting, sculpture, clothing and jewellery, automata, and invisibility. Asking what it meant for Shakespeare and his contemporaries to ‘begin’ or ‘end’ a literary or visual work, this book is invaluable for scholars and students of early modern English literature, drama, visual culture, material culture, theatre history, history and aesthetics.
    [Show full text]
  • English Renaissance
    1 ENGLISH RENAISSANCE Unit Structure: 1.0 Objectives 1.1 The Historical Overview 1.2 The Elizabethan and Jacobean Ages 1.2.1 Political Peace and Stability 1.2.2 Social Development 1.2.3 Religious Tolerance 1.2.4 Sense and Feeling of Patriotism 1.2.5 Discovery, Exploration and Expansion 1.2.6 Influence of Foreign Fashions 1.2.7 Contradictions and Set of Oppositions 1.3 The Literary Tendencies of the Age 1.3.1 Foreign Influences 1.3.2 Influence of Reformation 1.3.3 Ardent Spirit of Adventure 1.3.4 Abundance of Output 1.4 Elizabethan Poetry 1.4.1 Love Poetry 1.4.2 Patriotic Poetry 1.4.3 Philosophical Poetry 1.4.4 Satirical Poetry 1.4.5 Poets of the Age 1.4.6 Songs and Lyrics in Elizabethan Poetry 1.4.7 Elizabethan Sonnets and Sonneteers 1.5 Elizabethan Prose 1.5.1 Prose in Early Renaissance 1.5.2 The Essay 1.5.3 Character Writers 1.5.4 Religious Prose 1.5.5 Prose Romances 2 1.6 Elizabethan Drama 1.6.1 The University Wits 1.6.2 Dramatic Activity of Shakespeare 1.6.3 Other Playwrights 1.7. Let‘s Sum up 1.8 Important Questions 1.0. OBJECTIVES This unit will make the students aware with: The historical and socio-political knowledge of Elizabethan and Jacobean Ages. Features of the ages. Literary tendencies, literary contributions to the different of genres like poetry, prose and drama. The important writers are introduced with their major works. With this knowledge the students will be able to locate the particular works in the tradition of literature, and again they will study the prescribed texts in the historical background.
    [Show full text]
  • Bringing Richard Brome Online
    This is a repository copy of Bringing Richard Brome Online. White Rose Research Online URL for this paper: http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/105805/ Version: Published Version Article: Hirsch, BD orcid.org/0000-0002-6231-2080 (2010) Bringing Richard Brome Online. Early Theatre, 13 (1). pp. 137-153. ISSN 1206-9078 10.12745/et.13.1.837 This article is protected by copyright. Reproduced in accordance with the publisher's self-archiving policy. Reuse Items deposited in White Rose Research Online are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved unless indicated otherwise. They may be downloaded and/or printed for private study, or other acts as permitted by national copyright laws. The publisher or other rights holders may allow further reproduction and re-use of the full text version. This is indicated by the licence information on the White Rose Research Online record for the item. Takedown If you consider content in White Rose Research Online to be in breach of UK law, please notify us by emailing [email protected] including the URL of the record and the reason for the withdrawal request. [email protected] https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ Early Theatre Volume 13, Issue 1 2010 Article 7 Bringing Richard Brome Online Brett D. Hirsch∗ ∗University of Western Australia, [email protected] Copyright c 2010 by Early Theatre. Early Theatre is produced by The Berkeley Electronic Press (bepress). http://digitalcommons.mcmaster.ca/earlytheatre Bringing Richard Brome Online Brett D. Hirsch Abstract This review essay assesses Richard Brome Online, an online edition of the collected works of Richard Brome, in terms of the design, functionality, and usability of its features.
    [Show full text]
  • Michael West
    Theater of Enigma in Shakespeare’s England Michael West Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY 2018 © 2017 Michael West All rights reserved ABSTRACT Theater of Enigma in Shakespeare’s England Michael West Theater of Enigma in Shakespeare’s England demonstrates the cognitive, affective, and social import of enigmatic theatrical moments. While the presence of other playgoers obviously shapes the experience of attending a play, I argue that deliberately induced moments of audience ignorance are occasions for audience members to be especially aware of their relations to others who may or may not share their bafflement. I explore the character of states of knowing and not-knowing among audience members and the relations that obtain among playgoers who inhabit these states. Further, I trace the range of performance techniques whereby playgoers are positioned in a cognitive no-man's land, lying somewhere between full understanding and utter ignorance—techniques that I collectively term “enigmatic theater.” I argue that moments of enigmatic theater were a dynamic agent in the formation of collectives in early modern playhouses. I use here the term “collective” to denote the temporary, occasional, and fleeting quality of these groupings, which occur during performance but are dissipated afterwards. Sometimes, this collective resembles what Victor Turner terms communitas, in which the normal societal divisions are suspended and the playgoers become a unified collectivity. At other times, however, plays solicit the formation of multiple collectives defined by their differing degrees of knowledge about a seeming enigma.
    [Show full text]
  • Fantasies of Necrophilia in Early Modern English Drama
    City University of New York (CUNY) CUNY Academic Works All Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects 2-2014 Exquisite Corpses: Fantasies of Necrophilia in Early Modern English Drama Linda K. Neiberg Graduate Center, City University of New York How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! More information about this work at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu/gc_etds/1420 Discover additional works at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu This work is made publicly available by the City University of New York (CUNY). Contact: [email protected] EXQUISITE CORPSES: FANTASIES OF NECROPHILIA IN EARLY MODERN ENGLISH DRAMA by LINDA K. NEIBERG A dissertation submitted to the Graduate Faculty in English in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, The City University of New York 2014 ii © 2014 LINDA K. NEIBERG All Rights Reserved iii This manuscript has been read and accepted for the Graduate Faculty in English in satisfaction of the dissertation requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Mario DiGangi Date Chair of Examining Committee Carrie Hintz Date Acting Executive Officer Mario DiGangi Richard C. McCoy Steven F. Kruger Supervisory Committee THE CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK iv Abstract EXQUISITE CORPSES: FANTASIES OF NECROPHILIA IN EARLY MODERN ENGLISH DRAMA by LINDA K. NEIBERG Adviser: Professor Mario DiGangi My dissertation examines representations of necrophilia in Elizabethan and Jacobean drama. From the 1580s, when London’s theatres began to flourish, until their closure by Parliament in 1642, necrophilia was deployed as a dramatic device in a remarkable number of plays.
    [Show full text]
  • Actes Des Congrès De La Société Française Shakespeare, 33 | 2015 Middleton Beyond the Canon 2
    Actes des congrès de la Société française Shakespeare 33 | 2015 Shakespeare 450 Middleton beyond the Canon Daniela Guardamagna Electronic version URL: http://journals.openedition.org/shakespeare/3394 DOI: 10.4000/shakespeare.3394 ISSN: 2271-6424 Publisher Société Française Shakespeare Electronic reference Daniela Guardamagna, « Middleton beyond the Canon », Actes des congrès de la Société française Shakespeare [Online], 33 | 2015, Online since 10 October 2015, connection on 08 June 2020. URL : http://journals.openedition.org/shakespeare/3394 ; DOI : https://doi.org/10.4000/shakespeare.3394 This text was automatically generated on 8 June 2020. © SFS Middleton beyond the Canon 1 Middleton beyond the Canon Daniela Guardamagna 1 The old canon of Thomas Middleton1 has been deeply modified in the last forty years by attribution studies, by the analysis of philologists and the work of MacDonald P. Jackson, David Lake and Roger Holdsworth,2 and especially after the issue of what has been defined as “Middleton’s First Folio”, that is his Collected Works and Textual Companion, edited by Gary Taylor and John Lavagnino.3 2 Critics are now aware that there are many clues hinting at the fact that the ‘new Middleton’ is very different from the author that was proposed till the last decades of the 20th century, that is the cold, misogynist, clinical analyst of the society around him (“a 17th-century Ibsen or Zola”, as he was defined4), and that the new figure presents striking features which greatly modify our perception of his work. 3 In this paper I will concentrate on a specific instance concerning the new canon: the modification of female characters that becomes apparent in Middleton’s writing, considering the new plays, the tragedies in particular, that have been definitely attributed to him in the 2007 Collected Works.
    [Show full text]
  • TITUS ANDRONICUS ILLINOIS THEATRE Robert G
    TITUS ANDRONICUS ILLINOIS THEATRE Robert G. Anderson, director Thursday-Saturday, October 24-26, 2019, at 7:30pm Tuesday-Saturday, October 29-November 2, 2019, at 7:30pm Sunday, November 3, 2019, at 3pm Studio Theatre WELCOME TO THE true. The material is ever renewed and always 2019-2020 ILLINOIS embedded in a history of work on the stage. THEATRE SEASON! It is a true pleasure to The season also reflects our commitment to a share our work with diverse, inclusive, accessible theatre. Whether you. Students, faculty, on stage or behind the scenes, we strive to and guests have come make work that reflects and makes space for together to produce our whole community. From the planning and a year of exploration, design to the work you experience on stage, of reflection, and of we believe theatre has the capacity to engage illumination. We are the world as it is in all its complex challenges and proud to be in our second half-century as a to envision and enact the world as it might be. theatre department and offering drama at the We are so pleased you have chosen to share highest level. Illinois is a leading program with this with us. We hope you enjoy it and look more than 200 students and nearly 40 faculty forward to seeing you again. members. Housed in Krannert Center, we are fortunate to have the resources of a Gabriel Solis world-class environment for dramatic art. Professor and Head, Department of Theatre Theatre is a call to your senses and your spirit.
    [Show full text]
  • The Enactment of Religious Conversion in Medieval and Early Modern European Saint Plays
    Transformed Within, Transformed Without: The Enactment of Religious Conversion in Medieval and Early Modern European Saint Plays Emily Ciavarella Kuntz Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy under the Executive Committee of the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY 2020 © 2020 Emily Ciavarella Kuntz All Rights Reserved Abstract Transformed Within, Transformed Without: The Enactment of Religious Conversion in Medieval and Early Modern European Saint Plays Emily Ciavarella Kuntz My dissertation investigates the ways in which both medieval and early modern saint plays depict and incite religious conversion through self-aware theatrical techniques. In each of my chapters, I examine one or two popular saint plays from a given period and area (medieval England, medieval France, early modern Spain, and early modern England) and show how each play invites the audience to undergo a spiritual shift parallel to that of the saint protagonist. These playmakers harnessed the affective power and technology of theatrical performance to invite the audience to engage with performed religious conversion in a controlled, celebratory environment and to encourage them to convert toward a more deeply felt Christianity. The plays reconfigured the audience’s sensory and intellectual understanding of Christian theology in order for the audience to recognize spiritual truth within an inherently communal, participatory, and performative space. The plays I examine depend on the audience’s familiarity with theatrical culture and practice in order to distinguish between sincere and insincere religious performance. By making the process of conversion a theatrical performance onstage, these plays could advocate for the theatrical medium as a genuine and effective catalyst for spiritual renewal.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix the Queen Or the Excellency of Her Sex
    Appendix The Queen or The Excellency of her Sex HISTORY OF THE PLAY The Queen was published anonymously in 1653 and remained anonymous until1906 when Professor W. Bang edited the play and attributed it to Ford. Sherman in 1908, H. Dugdale Sykes in 1924 and Joan Sargeaunt in 1935 were all in agreement.' More recent I y Professor H. J. 0 liver in 1955 and Professor O.K. Anderson Jr. in 1972 both confirm Bang's opinion and most scholars would now attribute the play in its entirety to Ford.2 MAJOR THEMES The theme underlying the main plot is the cure of misogyny by arousing jealous suspicions in order to stimulate sexual attraction. This therapeutic idea has been attributed to the influence of Burtonian psychology. The subject is Alphonso, sentenced to death for rebellion but pardoned and married to the Queen, whose sex, however, he abhors. The agent is his counsellor Muretto who, by dropping into his master's mind suspicions of the Queen's relations with the young lord Petruchi, rouses him to a fury of sexual jealousy. Out of this theme three others develop. First is the trial of love, for the Queen endures with fortitude Alphonso's refusal to accept her as a wife and his subsequent accusation of unchastity. Second is the theme of honour; the Queen remains entirely loyal to her husband and also to her responsibilities towards her subjects, for she will allow none of them to risk life and limb by taking up the challenge of her cause. The theme of honour recurs in the secondary plot in Velasco's unwillingness to break the oath which he has sworn to the imperious Salassa even when she frees him from it.
    [Show full text]
  • The Dramatic Records of Sir Henry Herbert, Master of the Revels, 1623-1673
    ill "iil! !!;i;i;i; K tftkrmiti THE LIBRARY OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2007 with funding from IVIicrosoft Corporation http://www.archive.org/details/dramaticrecordsoOOgreaiala CORNELL STUDIES IN ENGLISH EDITED BY JOSEPH QUINCY ADAMS LANE COOPER CLARK SUTHERLAND NORTHUP THE DRAMATIC RECORDS OF SIR HENRY HERBERT MASTER OF THE REVELS, 1623-1673 EDITED BY JOSEPH QUINCY ADAMS CORNELL UNIVERSITY NEW HAVEN: VALE UNIVERSITY PRESS LONDON: HUMPHREY MILKORD OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS MDCCCCXVII 7 7 Copyright, 191 By Yale University Press First published, October, 191 PRESS OF THE NEW ERA PRINTING COMPANY LANCASTER, PA. College Library TO CLARK SUTHERLAND NORTHUP AS A TOKEN OF ESTEEM 1092850 PREFACE The dramatic records of the Office of the Revels during the reigns of Edward VI, Mar>', and Elizabeth have been admirably edited with full indexes and notes by Professor Albert Feuillerat; but the records of the Office during the reigns of James I, Charles I, and Charles TI remain either unedited or scattered in mis- cellaneous volumes, none of which is indexed. Every scholar working in the field of the Tudor-Stuart drama must have felt the desirability of having these later records printed in a more accessible form. In the present volume I have attempted to bring together the dramatic records of Sir Henry Herbert, during whose long administration the Office of the Revels attained the height of its power and importance. These records, most of them preserved through Herbert's own care, consist of his office-book, covering the period of 1 622-1 642, a few documents relating to the same period, and miscellaneous documents relating to the management of the Office after the Restoration.
    [Show full text]