DOCSLIB.ORG

World War II and Brazilian Workers: Populism at the Intersections Between National and Global Histories

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
World War II and Brazilian Workers: Populism at the Intersections Between National and Global Histories IRSH 62 (2017), Special Issue, pp. 165–190 doi:10.1017/S0020859017000608 © 2018 Internationaal Instituut voor Sociale Geschiedenis World War II and Brazilian Workers: Populism at the Intersections between National and Global Histories A LEXANDRE F ORTES Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro Department of History Av Governador Roberto da Silveira S/N Nova Iguaçu, RJ, Brazil E-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT: This article argues that World War II played a very important, and generally underestimated role in the rise of Brazilian populism. It starts with an overview of recent trends in the debates on the use of the concept of populism in Brazil, with particular attention to works that stress the years from 1941 to 1945 as a critical juncture. Secondly, it explores the connections between war effort, changes in labor regulations, and workers’ political participation in different contexts. Finally, it summarizes how the economic and social effects produced by the involvement of Brazil in the War led to profound and accelerated changes in the nature of the regime of Getúlio Vargas and in the role of workers in Brazilian politics. Populism is one of the most controversial terms in our political vocabulary. Used to describe a broad range of phenomena and bearing strong pejorative undertones, numerous scholars have questioned the concept. Attempts to discard it, however, have been in vain. The term re-emerges with each inflection of the global political scene, whether on the left, with the election of progressive governments in South America in the first decade of the twenty-first century,1 or on the right, in our current moment, epitomized by the election of Donald Trump as president of the United States.2 Although the transnational character of these “populist waves” is self- evident, analyses of them generally echo the nationalist logic inherent in the 1. See, for example, the polemic between Laclau and Žižek: Ernesto Laclau, On Populist Reason (London [etc.], 2005); Slavoj Žižek, “Against the Populist Temptation”, Critical Inquiry, 32:3 (2006), pp. 551–574. 2. For recent examples of two significantly different points of view, see: Christian Salmon, “Trump, Fascism, and the Construction of ‘The People’: An Interview with Judith Butler”, available at: http://www.versobooks.com/blogs/3025-trump-fascism-and-the-construction-of- the-people-an-interview-with-judith-butler; last accessed 24 October 2017; Guillaume Erner, “Europe: The Return of the People, or of Populism. Interview with Jacques Rancière”, available at: http://www.versobooks.com/blogs/2896-europe-the-return-of-the-people-or-of-populism; last accessed 24 October 2017. Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 170.106.40.219, on 28 Sep 2021 at 18:22:08, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020859017000608 166 Alexandre Fortes object of study. Global processes, such as the impact of the Great Depres- sion in the 1930s or the reaction to the social impact of globalization in the post-1989 era, are usually mentioned, and studies of populism often iden- tify general, shared characteristics of the phenomenon. The study of each case, however, tends to prioritize domestic factors. This article will probe this subject from a different perspective, analyzing Brazil’s major historical experience of populism, varguismo, through the lens of country’s involvement in World War II. The reign of Getúlio Vargas (1882– 1954), the wealthy Brazilian rancher who was twice elected president and also ruled as a dictator from 1937 to 1945 under the so-called Estado Novo, I hypothesize, established a form of mass politics that can only be fully understood when taking the geopolitical, economic, and social impact of the most extensive armed conflict in the twentieth century into account. Thus, it will be possible to bring the subject of populism together with the debate concerning the relationship between total war and the period’s trans- formations in social rights and labor relations. This article aims to illustrate how an attentive eye toward the relationship between national space and global processes can substantially alter the contours of a traditional object of study. This article has three parts. First, I consider the relationship between workers, varguismo, and the historiographic debate about the validity of the use of the concept of populism in the Brazilian context. Next, the article will engage with scholarship that discusses the relationship between total war, citizenship, and social policies in other regions. In the third part, I pause to consider the significance of World War II in creating the condi- tions for the reconfiguration of the working class and in its formative role in Brazilian workers’ political experience. VARGAS, WORKERS AND POPULISM In studies of twentieth-century Brazil, populism has been approached from many angles, yet one of the major concerns has always been to understand the ways in which workers were incorporated into political participation from the 1930s on. That is to say: why did so many workers support a political regime that, at least in the eyes of many academic observers, did not genuinely represent their interests? Although the adjective “populist” can be applied to a diverse spectrum of types of leadership, parties, and local governments, at the center of the debate over the validity of the concept is the final assessment of the political legacy of Getúlio Vargas’s rule and that of his political heir, president João Goulart (1961–1964).3 3. Originally from the state of Rio Grande do Sul on the border with Argentina and Uruguay, Vargas ran in the presidential election of 1930 with the Liberal Alliance (Aliança Liberal), a coalition of regional oligarchies from the peripheries of Brazil that had the broad support of the Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 170.106.40.219, on 28 Sep 2021 at 18:22:08, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020859017000608 World War II, Populism, and Brazilian Workers 167 In the 1960s and 1970s, authors like Gino Germani, Otávio Ianni, and Francisco Weffort used the concept of populism to construct a general model used to explain the transformations unfolding in Latin America from the 1930s on, particularly in the three most iconic cases: the reigns of Lázaro Cárdenas in Mexico (1934–1940), Juan D. Perón in Argentina (1943/45–1955), and Getúlio Vargas in Brazil (1930–1945; 1951–1954).4 These approaches took as their point of departure the impact of the Great Depression on agro-export systems, the crisis of hegemony within Latin American societies, and working- and middle-class dissatisfaction with the region’s oligarchical republics. These factors combined, the classical analyses said, brought about the ascendancy of illiberal ideas, the establishment of a new economic model (import substitution industrialization), the acceleration in internal migration, and the emergence of charismatic leaders whose ascent was based on the manipulation of the working classes, particularly what was seen, following Germani, as the new and “immature” sectors of the working class. In these approaches, populism always appeared as manipulative and demagogic, and workers as tempted to follow a deceptive leader. Although it remains influential in public opinion, this model did not survive either the conceptual revisions or the increase of empirical research middle classes in the country’s main urban centers, of the low-ranking officer class in the Army that had led various rebellions in the 1920s (the so-called lieutenants or tenentes) and of the reformists within the labor movement. The aliancistas (supporters of the Liberal Alliance) con- tested the monopoly of power held by politicians in the states of São Paulo and Minas Gerais since the beginning of the nineteenth century and defended the strengthening of centralized power, the adoption of policies that promoted industrialization, and the expansion of social legislation to avoid worsening labor conflicts. The candidate from the incumbent party, Júlio Prestes, was declared winner of the election, but before he could be sworn in as president, his government was overturned by a political-military movement that denounced the electoral results as fraudulent. Coming to power through this “Revolution of 1930”, Vargas was proclaimed the head of the Provisional Government, and later elected the president of the Republic by indirect means through the National Constituent Assembly of 1934. In 1937, the presidential elections that had been planned for the following year were suspended, using as a pretext the supposed discovery of a communist conspiracy to take power. Instead, a dictatorial government known as the Estado Novo (New State) was installed, ushering in a corporatist regime that was one of the most authoritarian and ideologically most right-leaning of Latin America’s “classical” populisms. It would last until 1945, when Vargas was deposed, beginning a period of electoral democracy. In 1950, Vargas became president of the Republic again, this time democratically elected, yet proving unable to withstand the pressure put on him by his opposition. In 1954, in the context of a crisis after a failed assassination attempt against his major political adversary, he committed suicide while still in office. The years after his death saw a continuation of many of the arrangements of varguismo. Taking office in 1961, President João Goulart, a left-wing nationalist, was about to renew the populist tradition in a more progressive and reform-oriented way. This was disrupted by a coup in 1964, which ushered in a military dictatorship that lasted until 1985. 4. Gino Germani, Política y sociedad en una época de transición. De la sociedad tradicional a la sociedad de masas (Buenos Aires, 1962); Otávio Ianni, O colapso do populismo no Brasil (Rio de Janeiro, 1968); idem, A formação do estado populista na América Latina (Rio de Janeiro, 1975); Francisco Weffort, O populismo na política brasileira (Rio de Janeiro, 1978).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Populism of the Twenty-First Century” Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars Washington, D.C
    DRAFT—PLEASE CITE ONLY WITH PERMISSION Prepared for the conference “Populism of the Twenty-First Century” Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars Washington, D.C. October 8, 2009 Populism in Brazil: from Getúlio to Lula Leslie Bethell Oxford University In Latin America (and elsewhere) populism has been, and continues to be, an elusive concept, notoriously difficult to define, and highly contested, both in the study of political history and contemporary politics. It has often been said that more has been written about definitions of populism than about populism itself. Populism is perhaps best and most simply defined as encompassing those political movements/parties and, above all, those ‘charismatic’/personalist/ opportunistic/demagogic politicians, self-styled ‘outsiders’ (though mainly from the elite), who reach power (usually, though not always, through elections), exercise power and retain power through some kind of direct or quasi-direct, unmediated relationship and identification with previously politically unorganized, politically excluded, sections of the population which are politically mobilized for the first time – that is to say, mobilized by ‘populists’ from above. For the so-called ‘classical populists’, from, say, the 1930s to the 1960s, and the beginnings of mass politics in Latin America, it was the new and newly enfranchised urban working class and public sector white-collar urban lower middle class that was available for political mobilization. (The mass of the rural poor were largely ignored since they had no vote - often a consequence of illiteracy - or their votes were delivered to local landowners and political bosses.) The so-called ‘neo-populists’, of both Right and Left, emerged from the late 1980s, in conditions of economic and social crisis, after many political scientists and sociologists had announced the end of populism in Latin America.
    [Show full text]
  • Laurismo E Janismo a Confronto Due Casi Di Populismo Del Secondo Dopoguerra in Prospettiva Comparata (1947-1961)
    Diacronie Studi di Storia Contemporanea N° 19, 3 | 2014 Miscellaneo Laurismo e janismo a confronto Due casi di populismo del secondo dopoguerra in prospettiva comparata (1947-1961) Federico Robbe Edizione digitale URL: http://journals.openedition.org/diacronie/1626 DOI: 10.4000/diacronie.1626 ISSN: 2038-0925 Editore Association culturelle Diacronie Notizia bibliografica digitale Federico Robbe, « Laurismo e janismo a confronto », Diacronie [Online], N° 19, 3 | 2014, documento 6, Messo online il 01 septembre 2014, consultato il 01 mai 2019. URL : http://journals.openedition.org/ diacronie/1626 ; DOI : 10.4000/diacronie.1626 Creative Commons License Diacronie Studi di Storia Contemporanea www.diacronie.it N. 19 | 3|2014 6/ Laurismo e janismo a confronto Due casi di populismo del secondo dopoguerra in prospettiva comparata (1947-1961) Federico ROBBE * L’articolo affronta due esperienze di populismo accomunate da un contesto in fase di modernizzazione (Italia e Brasile) e da un rapporto tra il leader carismatico e la parte più povera e umile della popolazione. I due Paesi, infatti, nei primi anni del secondo dopoguerra costituivano due laboratori populisti di un certo interesse, alla luce dei profondi mutamenti che stavano attraversando. Achille Lauro e Jânio Quadros seppero porsi nel contesto locale e nazionale come outsider di successo – uno da destra, l’altro da sinistra – grazie a campagne elettorali bizzarre ma estremamente efficaci, a messaggi semplificatori, e a una chiara idea di popolo a cui fare riferimento. 1. Genesi ed evoluzione di due populismi: laurismo a destra e janismo a sinistra, 1947-1952 l rapporto con la politica dell’armatore Achille Lauro è sempre stato caratterizzato dal massimo pragmatismo.
    [Show full text]
  • The Latin American Revolution Cehus
    CEHuS Centro de Estudios Humanos y Sociales Nahuel Moreno The Latin American Revolution Nahuel Moreno The Latin American Revolution First Spanish edition: Palabra Obrera, 1962 Second Spanish edition: Editorial CEHuS, 2018 First English edition: Editorial CEHus, 2019 English translation: Daniel Iglesias Cover and interior design: Daniel Iglesias www.nahuelmoreno.org www.uit-ci.org www.izquierdasocialista.org.ar Copyright by CEHuS , Centro de Estudios Humanos y Sociales Buenos Aires, 2019 [email protected] CEHuS Centro de Estudios Humanos y Sociales Table of Contents Preface to second Spanish edition ..................................................... 1 Why this republishing? ...............................................................................................1 Forewords ......................................................................................... 3 Chapter I The first colonisation ......................................................................... 4 Liberal and pseudo-Marxist mystification of the American conquest ........................4 The capitalist character of the American colonisation ...............................................5 Contradictions and differences in the colonisation ....................................................6 The Argentine colonisation .........................................................................................7 The colonisation of Brazil ............................................................................................8 Chapter II The first independence
    [Show full text]
  • Rural Workers and Labour Justice: the Estatuto Do Trabalhador Rural in Brazil's Cacao Region, 1963-1973
    Rural workers and Labour Justice: the Estatuto do Trabalhador Rural in Brazil's cacao region, 1963-1973 Frank J. Luce A Dissertation submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Graduate Programme in Law York University Toronto, Ontario September 2009 Library and Archives Bibliotheque et 1*1 Canada Archives Canada Published Heritage Direction du Branch Patrimoine de I'edition 395 Wellington Street 395, rue Wellington Ottawa ON K1A 0N4 Ottawa ON K1A 0N4 Canada Canada Your file Votre reference ISBN: 978-0-494-54095-4 Our file Notre reference ISBN: 978-0-494-54095-4 NOTICE: AVIS: The author has granted a non­ L'auteur a accorde une licence non exclusive exclusive license allowing Library and permettant a la Bibliotheque et Archives Archives Canada to reproduce, Canada de reproduire, publier, archiver, publish, archive, preserve, conserve, sauvegarder, conserver, transmettre au public communicate to the public by par telecommunication ou par I'lnternet, preter, telecommunication or on the Internet, distribuer et vendre des theses partout dans le loan, distribute and sell theses monde, a des fins commerciales ou autres, sur worldwide, for commercial or non­ support microforme, papier, electronique et/ou commercial purposes, in microform, autres formats. paper, electronic and/or any other formats. The author retains copyright L'auteur conserve la propriete du droit d'auteur ownership and moral rights in this et des droits moraux qui protege cette these. Ni thesis. Neither the thesis nor la these ni des extraits substantiels de celle-ci substantial extracts from it may be ne doivent §tre imprimes ou autrement printed or otherwise reproduced reproduits sans son autorisation.
    [Show full text]
  • Populism in Latin America: Old and New Populisms in Argentina and Brazil
    Populism in Latin America: Old and new populisms in Argentina and Brazil Juan Grigera University College London, UK Corresponding Author: Juan Grigera, British Academy Postdoctoral Fellow, Institute of Americas, University College London, Gower Street, WC1E 6BT London, UK. Email: [email protected] Abstract There has been a renewed interest in populism in Latin America, sparked by the social mobilization against neoliberalism usually referred to as the 'Pink Tide'. Governments brought to power by the 'Pink Tide' have been successful in reconstructing the conditions of capital accumulation as well as incorporating a new set of social movement demands. This article puts forward an interpretation of ‘Pink Tide neopopulism' based on a political economy approach. It argues that the two factors of a crisis of neoliberalism in the region and the existence of social movements with unmet demands are not enough to explain the rise and demise of populism. The commodity boom needs to be added as an enabling condition of these transformations. By revisiting the debate in Latin America and proposing a different reading the article redefines an overloaded term and provides a new analytical viewpoint from which to understand the ‘historical task’ of populism in Brazil and Argentina. Keywords Pink Tide neopopulism, political economy of populism, Lulism, Kirchnerism, South America Introduction In no other region of the world does populism and its debate have such a long and rich political and socioeconomic history as in Latin America, even if the rural Russian and North American cases preceded it. In the past decade and a half, the coming to office of a series of centre left governments (such as Lula in Brazil, the Kirchners in Argentina or Rafael Correa in Ecuador) has given new space (and meaning) to the term, both politically and academically.
    [Show full text]
  • Leslie Bethell Essays on History and Politics
    BRAZIL essays on history and politics Leslie Bethell BRAZIL Essays on history and politics Leslie Bethell Institute of Latin American Studies, School of Advanced Study, University of London, 2018 British Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library ISBN: 978-1-908857-61-3 (PDF edition) DOI: 10.14296/618.9781908857613 ISBN: 978-1-908857-54-5 (paperback edition) Institute of Latin American Studies School of Advanced Study University of London Senate House London WC1E 7HU Telephone: 020 7862 8844 Email: [email protected] Web: http://ilas.sas.ac.uk This book is published under a Creative Commons Attribution- NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) license. More information regarding CC licenses is available at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/ Available to download free at http://www.humanities-digital-library.org Contents Preface v Anthony Peireira Introduction Why Brazil? An autobiographical fragment 1 I 1. Brazil and Latin America 19 II 2. Britain and Brazil (1808–1914) 57 3. The Paraguayan War (1864–70) 93 4. The decline and fall of slavery in Brazil (1850–88) 113 III 5. The long road to democracy in Brazil 147 6. Populism in Brazil 175 7. The failure of the Left in Brazil 195 Preface eslie Bethell is one of the few great Brazilianists, as foreign scholars of Brazil are called, of his and subsequent generations. Brazilianists engage in scholarship that has breadth and depth; illuminate Brazil as an object ofL study, asking the most important questions that can be asked about the country; and give voice to Brazilian experiences and perspectives.
    [Show full text]
  • Middle Class Families in Sao Paulo, Brazil
    City University of New York (CUNY) CUNY Academic Works All Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects 1977 Santana: Middle Class Families in Sao Paulo, Brazil Elizabeth Riggs Hansen The Graduate Center, City University of New York How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! More information about this work at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu/gc_etds/1851 Discover additional works at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu This work is made publicly available by the City University of New York (CUNY). Contact: [email protected] INFORMATION TO USERS This material was produced from a microfilm copy of the original document. While the most advanced technological means to photograph and reproduce this document have been used, the quality is heavily dependent upon the quality of the original submitted. The following explanation of techniques is provided to help you understand markings or patterns which may appear on this reproduction. 1.The sign or "target" for pages apparently lacking from the document photographed is "Missing Page(s)". If it was possible to obtain the missing page(s) or section, they are spliced into the film along with adjacent pages. This may have necessitated cutting thru an image and duplicating adjacent pages to insure you complete continuity. 2. When an image on the film is obliterated with a large round black mark, it is an indication that the photographer suspected that the copy may have moved during exposure and thus cause a blurred image. You willa find good image of the page in the adjacent frame. 3. When a map, drawing or chart, etc., was part of the material being photographed the photographer followed a definite method in "sectioning" the material.
    [Show full text]
  • Urban Labor History in Twentieth Centurybrazil French and Fortes
    Urban Labor History in Twentieth Century Brazil John D.French, Duke University, and Alexandre Fortes, Universidade Estadualde Campinas The Latin American I.nstitute 'The University ,ofNew Mexico 801 YaleNE . Albuquerqu~ ~'M'871~1-1016 J Introduction . 1 Defining the Nature and Scope of this Bibliography. 17 Annotated Bibliography , . .. 21 Bibliographies and Archival Guides. .. 21 Literature Reviews and MethodologicalReflections. ... ..... ... .... 25 Published Primary Source Collections.. ............ .. ........... 27 Worken and Worken'Movements to 1930 . ......... .. ...... 31 Worken and Worken'Movements, 1930-1964.. .... .. 53 Workenand Worken'M~ts, 1964to the Present 91 Urban Labor History in Twentieth Century Brazil m Urban Labor History in Twentieth Century Brazil Political society is divided into proprietors and those who own no property; the former are infinitely fewer than the latter, as is well known. The proprietor tries to buy as cheaply as possible the only possession of the propertyless or wage earner, his labor. The latter in tum tries to sell it as dearly as possible. In this struggle, the weaker contestant although greater in numbers usually succwnbs to the stronger. -Luis dos Santos Vilhena in late eighteenth century Bahia1 Introduction An important strain of Brazilian social thought, even among the dominant classes, has long recognized the conflicting interests that divide those who labor and those who are labored for. More than a century after Santos Vilhena, Brazilian industrialistJorge Street was equally frank in
    [Show full text]