DOCSLIB.ORG

Tennis Study Guide History

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Tennis Study Guide History Tennis Study Guide Grotthuss History Tennis originates from two dates. Between 1859 and 1865 Major Harry Gem and his friend Augurio Perera developed the game of tennis by combing elements of rackets and the Spanish ball games called “Pelota”. Perera played this game on his croquet lawn in Birmingham, England. Later in 1873 in Llanelidan, Wales, Major Walter Clopton Wingfield contributed to the development of tennis today by the name and much of the French vocabulary of royal tennis. • 1877 First Championships at Wimbledon, London. • 1881 The United States National Lawn Tennis Association was formed to standardize the rules and organize competitions. Grip There are four types of grips: Continental, Eastern, Western, and Eastern Backhand The court www.novasports.com/ tenc#15D381 Service o To determine serve spin the racket in hand and call “M” or “W” or toss a coin. Winner may choose to serve or receive, the loser of the spin or coin toss picks the side of the net to start on. o The server must have both feet behind the baseline and either to the right or left of center line o The server alternates behind the right and left courts beginning from the right every game. o The server alternates after every point is scored o If the score is an even number of points played, the server will be serving to right service court o If the score is an odd number of points played, then the server will be serving to the left service court The ball served must pass over the net and hit within the proper service court-Liners are GOOD The serve is called a fault if: o Server is on or over the baseline o Misses the ball in trying to strike it o Ball does not land in proper service court o Ball hits net posts Penalty for Fault: o If on first ball, she may serve the second ball. o If on second ball, the opponent is awarded a point The serve is called an ace if: o The opponent is unable to return the serve, and a point is awarded to the serve The serve is called a let if: o The served ball touches the net and lands within proper service court o The ball is served before receiver is ready Penalty for LET-none- that ball is reserved The receiver must let the served ball. Bounce once before returning it One person serves an entire game and then opponent serves the next game Opponents change sides of not after every odd game(1-3-5-7- etc.) Types of Serves Flat-Least amount of spin. Attained by snapping wrist up and forward through the middle of the ball. Slice-Racket face must move across the backside of the ball on an almost horizontal plane. Using an imaginary clock hit from 9-3. Topspin-Swing from low to high and brush backside of the ball at about a 45-degree angle; using an imaginary clock hit from 8-2. Scoring Game The scoring for tennis is Love (0), 15, 30, 40, deuce and advantage. The first point won by a player is 15, the second 30, and the third 40. The fourth point will be game. However if both players have won three points (40-all), the score is then called deuce. The player must win two points in a row to will the game. The first point after deuce is called advantage either to server or receiver. If the next point after advantage is lost then the score returns to deuce. Set If a player wins six games, then they win the set, winning by two always. If the score reaches five games to six, then the winning player must win the next game. If the score reaches six games all, then it becomes a tiebreak. Usually men play best of five and women play best of three sets. The Tiebreak When a game is six all, a tiebreak is played. Points are called 1,2,3,etc. Each side serves only once so serve is far. The player who wins the tiebreak game is the player who wins seven points with at least two more points than his opponent. If the game is seven to six. Players also must keep playing until one player is two points ahead. In doubles the players serve alternately in the same order as before. Change of Ends When the total number of games played is uneven players change ends. This is so if outside conditions like sun or wind are not to one players advantage. Time between Points Tennis games should by nature be continuous. Players have 30 seconds before playing the next point. On the changeover the resting time is one minute. So as soon as the last point of the game is played, you will have ninety seconds before you have to start the next point. Terms Ace-A serve that the receiver is unable to touch. Alley-The area on the court between the singles and doubles sidelines. Approach Shot-A groundstroke hit by a player on his way to the net. It is often a chip on the forehand and a slice on the backhand Backhand-A groundstroke hit on the non-racket side of the body Back Swing-That part of the stroke that comes before the hit. On the forehand and backhand groundstrokes, it is usually a rather full motion, with the racket moving back behind the body and then swinging toward the body. There is very little backswing on volleys. Bagel-Winning or losing a set 6-0. Baseline-The farthest end line from the net on the court. Breadstick-Winning (or losing) a set 6-1 Breaking Serve-The refers to the receiver winning his opponent’s serve. In good tennis, there are very few service breaks, and many times there is only one per set. Change Over-The players change sides after the odd games of each set. (1,3,5,7,9, etc.) In match play, the time limit on the change over is 60 seconds. Clean the Line or Clip the Line- A shot in which some part of the ball lands on the line. Chip-blocking a shot with extreme underspin. Cross Court-Diagonal shots from one side of the court to the other. Deuce-when both sides are tied at forty (40-40). Double Bagel-Two sets won to love; see Bagel. Double Fault-A player is given two chances to get his/her serve into the proper court. If they fail, they have served a double fault. Doubles- A tennis game played by four players, two per side of the court. Drop Shot-A ball hit with so much under-spin that if barely clears the net and then dies (because it has very little or no forward motion and bounces low.) Drop Volley- A drop shot executed from a volley. Fault- A missed serve not starting the point Foot Fault-A Fault by virtue of stepping on the baseline or inside the baseline or over the center mark on the baseline before the ball is hit on the serve. Forehand-A stroke that is hit on the racket side of the body. Game Point-A situation when the player who is leading needs one more point to win a game. Golden Set-Winning a set without losing a point Grand Slam-Wimbledon, the U.S. Open, the French Open, and the Australian Open. Groundstroke-Strokes that are hit after the ball has bounced once. Hail Mary- An extremely high lob, for defensive purposes. Half Volley- A volley shot made after a short bounce Hawk Eye- A high speed computer system used to track the path of the ball which is used in important matches Head of the racket- the portion of the racket that contains the string Hindoo-A do over due to scoring or line call dispute, similar to a golf Mulligan Holding-This refers to winning the game that you serve. I-formation- In doubles a formation where the server and partner stand on the same side of the court(deuce or advantage court) before starting the point. Inside-out-Running around one side(backhand side) and hitting a crosscourt shot Inside-in-Running around one side and hitting it down the line: less popular than the inside-out ITF-The International Tennis Federation, the governing body of world tennis. Jamming-To Serve or return straight to the opponent’s body. Let Service-When the ball from a serve touches the net but lands in the service court: the serve is void, and the server gets to retake that serve. Line Judge-Person who watches the boundary lines of the court, calls in or out. Love-zero –score Love game- A shutout game, won without the opponent scoring. Match Point- When a player who is leading needs one more point to win the match. Mini-Break-To win a point from the opponent’s serve in a tiebreak. Mixed Doubles-two female and two male players playing doubles one of each sex on each side of the net. Net Point-A point won or lost by approaching the net. No-Man’s Land-The area between the service line and baseline, where a player is most vulnerable. Open stance-Hitting the ball while facing the opponent and facing parallel to the baseline. Out-A ball that lands outside the boundary area. Overhead-(Smash)-Hitting the ball over your head the stronger of these is considered a smash. Poaching-(doubles)-When one player at the net moves to volley a shot intended for his/her partner.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Simulation of a Badminton Racket a Parametric Study of Racket Design Parameters Using Finite Element Analysis
    Simulation of a Badminton Racket A parametric study of racket design parameters using Finite Element Analysis. Master's thesis in Applied Mechanics ELIAS BLOMSTRAND MIKE DEMANT Department of Applied Mechanics CHALMERS UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY G¨oteborg, Sweden 2017 MASTER'S THESIS IN APPLIED MECHANICS Simulation of a Badminton Racket A parametric study of racket design parameters using Finite Element Analysis. ELIAS BLOMSTRAND MIKE DEMANT Department of Applied Mechanics Division of Solid Mechanics CHALMERS UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY G¨oteborg, Sweden 2017 Simulation of a Badminton Racket A parametric study of racket design parameters using Finite Element Analysis. ELIAS BLOMSTRAND MIKE DEMANT © ELIAS BLOMSTRAND, MIKE DEMANT, 2017 Master's thesis 2017:52 ISSN 1652-8557 Department of Applied Mechanics Division of Solid Mechanics Chalmers University of Technology SE-412 96 G¨oteborg Sweden Telephone: +46 (0)31-772 1000 Cover: Illustration of a smash sequence for a badminton racket. Chalmers Reproservice G¨oteborg, Sweden 2017 Simulation of a Badminton Racket A parametric study of racket design parameters using Finite Element Analysis. Master's thesis in Applied Mechanics ELIAS BLOMSTRAND MIKE DEMANT Department of Applied Mechanics Division of Solid Mechanics Chalmers University of Technology Abstract Badminton, said to be the worlds fastest ball sport, is a fairly unknown sport from a scientific point of view. There has been great progress made to get from the old wooden rackets of the 19th century to the light-weight high performance composite ones used today, but the development process is based on a trial and error method rather than on scientific knowledge. The limited amount of existing studies indicate that racket parameters like shaft stiffness, center of gravity and head geometry affect the performance of the racket greatly.
    [Show full text]
  • Tennismatchviz: a Tennis Match Visualization System
    ©2016 Society for Imaging Science and Technology TennisMatchViz: A Tennis Match Visualization System Xi He and Ying Zhu Department of Computer Science Georgia State University Atlanta - 30303, USA Email: [email protected], [email protected] Abstract hit?” Sports data visualization can be a useful tool for analyzing Our visualization technique addresses these issues by pre- or presenting sports data. In this paper, we present a new tech- senting tennis match data in a 2D interactive view. This Web nique for visualizing tennis match data. It is designed as a supple- based visualization provides a quick overview of match progress, ment to online live streaming or live blogging of tennis matches. while allowing users to highlight different technical aspects of the It can retrieve data directly from a tennis match live blogging web game or read comments by the broadcasting journalists or experts. site and display 2D interactive view of match statistics. Therefore, Its concise form is particularly suitable for mobile devices. The it can be easily integrated with the current live blogging platforms visualization can retrieve data directly from a tennis match live used by many news organizations. The visualization addresses the blogging web site. Therefore it does not require extra data feed- limitations of the current live coverage of tennis matches by pro- ing mechanism and can be easily integrated with the current live viding a quick overview and also a great amount of details on de- blogging platform used by many news media. mand. The visualization is designed primarily for general public, Designed as “visualization for the masses”, this visualiza- but serious fans or tennis experts can also use this visualization tion is concise and easy to understand and yet can provide a great for analyzing match statistics.
    [Show full text]
  • Grand Slams’ Are Iconic Global Sports Competitions And, As Proven by the 2017 Australian Open, Capable of Drawing Blockbuster Audiences
    The four tennis ‘grand slams’ are iconic global sports competitions and, as proven by the 2017 Australian Open, capable of drawing blockbuster audiences. Roger Federer’s victory over Rafael Nadal brought Eurosport its largest-ever audience for a tennis match with 20.7 million viewers across Europe, while in the host country, the 3.6-million (4.4-million peak) figure was the highest audience for the final in over a decade. The prestige and image attached to grand slam tennis is not lost on the sport’s broadcast partners. For domestic broadcasters this has led to a continuous fee increase for the quartet of slams. Using Sportcal’s Revenue Dashboard – available to subscribers of the Media Intelligence Centre – to analyse the domestic revenue generated, Sportcal Insight examines how the grand slams have enhanced their domestic rights revenues. Currency conversions, where possible, have been done at the time of the deal and modelled data has been used for incremental rises during a rights agreement. All grand slams have long-running domestic deals with established broadcasters. This, it can be argued, limits competition and the potential for mushrooming revenues, resulting in a more modest rise than might otherwise be the case. In Australia, free-to-air network Seven’s most recent deal with Tennis Australia is under investigation by the country’s corporate watchdog because a competitive bidding process wasn’t launched, amid claims that the governing body could have raised an extra A$50 million ($45 million) had the rights been taken to the open market. The 2017 women’s Australian Open final attracted 360,000 more viewers than the final of T20 cricket’s Big Bash League (aired on another free-to-air broadcaster, Network Ten, at the same time).
    [Show full text]
  • TENNIS: History of Tennis at the Olympic Games
    OSC REFERENCE COLLECTION TENNIS History of Tennis at the Olympic Games 19.10.2017 TENNIS History of Tennis at the Olympic Games TENNIS Seoul 1988 Beijing 2008 London 2012 Rio 2016 Singles (M) Singles (M) Doubles (W) Singles (M) INTRODUCTION Tennis was on the Olympic programme from the Games of the I Olympiad in Athens in 1896, until the Games of the VIII Olympiad in Paris in 1924. It was then removed from the programme owing to a difference of opinion between the IOC and the International Tennis Federation. Tennis made its Olympic return as a demonstration sport in 1968 and 1984 and has featured on the Olympic programme since the Games of the XXIV Olympiad in Seoul in 1988. KEY STAGES Entry 1894: At the Paris Congress held in June, the desire was expressed for “athletics games (football, lawn tennis, real tennis, etc.)” to feature on the Olympic programme. Withdrawal 1928: At the 27th IOC Session held in Amsterdam in July and August, the IOC Executive Board’s decision to remove tennis from the Olympic programme was approved. This decision was supported following the breakdown in negotiations between the IOC and the International Federation over the latter’s various demands (being able to apply its own definition of amateurism in particular). Return to the 1981: At the 84th IOC Session held in Baden-Baden in September and programme October, it was decided to add tennis to the programme of the Games of the XXIV Olympiad in Seoul in 1988. Mixed doubles 2009: At the IOC Executive Board meeting held in Berlin in August, the addition of mixed doubles for the Games in London in 2012 was approved.
    [Show full text]
  • Rapid Sensory Profiling of Tennis Rackets †
    Proceedings Rapid Sensory Profiling of Tennis Rackets † Maximilian Bauer 1,*, Sean Mitchell 1, Nathan Elliott 2 and Jonathan Roberts 1 1 Wolfson School of Mechanical, Electrical and Manufacturing Engineering, Loughborough University, Loughborough LE11 3QF, UK; [email protected] (S.M.); [email protected] (J.R.) 2 R&D Racquet Sports, HEAD Sport GmbH, 6921 Kennelbach, Austria; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +44-7902-592-659 † Presented at the 13th Conference of the International Sports Engineering Association, Online, 22–26 June 2020. Published: 15 June 2020 Abstract: Tennis racket manufacturers rely on subjective assessments from testers during the development process. However, these assessments often lack validity and include multiple sources of inconsistency in the way testers make subjective ratings. The purpose of this research was to investigate the suitability of the free-choice profiling (FCP) method in combination with principle component analysis (PCA) and multiple factor analysis (MFA) to determine the sensory profile of rackets. FCP was found to be a suitable technique to quickly evaluate the sensory profile of rackets; however, consumer testers tended to use ill-defined, industry-generated terms, which negatively impacted discrimination and inter-rater agreement. Discrimination and inter-rater agreement improved for attributes referring to measurable parameters of the rackets, such as vibration. This study furthers our understanding of tennis racket feel and supports racket engineers in designing new subjective testing methods, which provide more meaningful data regarding racket feel. Keywords: feel; sensory analysis; tennis rackets; free-choice profiling; PCA; MFA 1. Introduction Since performance advancements have become more challenging in the tennis racket industry, manufacturers rely increasingly on consumer feedback in terms of racket feel to provide direction in the development process.
    [Show full text]
  • Ball Change in Tennis: How Does It Affect Match Characteristics and Rally Pace in Grand Slam Tournaments?
    Original Article Ball change in tennis: How does it affect match characteristics and rally pace in Grand Slam tournaments? JAN CARBOCH 1 , MATEJ BLAU, MICHAL SKLENARIK, JAKUB SIMAN, KRISTYNA PLACHA Department of Sport Games, Faculty of Physical Education and Sport, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic ABSTRACT Tennis balls degrade after fast racket and ground impacts until they are changed after agreed number of games. The aim is to analyse the new (after the ball change) and used balls (prior to the ball change) match characteristics and the frequency of rally shots in matches in the Australian Open, French Open and Wimbledon in 2017. Paired samples t-tests and Cohen d were used to compare the point duration, number of rally shots, time between the points, rally pace and work to rest ratio among these tournaments. There was a significant difference in rally shots number played with the new balls (4.17 ± 0.86) compared to the used balls (4.60 ± 1.10) in female matches (p = 0.047); in males matches large effect size was found (d = - 0.83) in the same variable with the new balls (4.44 ± 0.57) and used balls (4.95 ± 0.66), both happened in the Australian Open. No difference was found between the new and used balls in the rally pace in all the observed events. The Wimbledon match characteristics were least affected by the ball change. The ball degradation affected the match characteristic the most in the Australian Open, in terms of more rally shots, but not slowing down the rally pace.
    [Show full text]
  • Tennis Study Guide
    TENNIS STUDY GUIDE HISTORY Mary Outerbridge is credited with bringing tennis to America in the mid-1870’s by introducing it to the Staten Island Cricket and Baseball Club. In 1880 the United States Lawn Tennis Association (USLTA) was established, Lawn was dropped from the name in the 1970’s and now go by (USTA). Tennis began as a lawn sport, but later clay, asphalt and concrete became more standard surfaces. The four most prestigious World tennis tournaments include: the U.S. Open, Australian Open, French Open, and Wimbledon . In 1988, tennis became an official medal sport. Tennis can be played year round, is low in cost, and needs only two or four players; it is also suitable for all age groups as well as both sexes. EQUIPMENT The only equipment needed to play tennis consists of a racket, a can of balls, court shoes and clothing that permits easy movement. The most important tip for beginners to remember is to find a racket with the right grip. The net hangs 42 inches high at each post and 36 inches high at the center. RULES The game starts when one person serves from anywhere behind the baseline to the right of the center mark and to the left of the doubles sideline. The server has two chances to serve legally into the diagonal service court. Failure to serve into the court or making a serving fault results in a point for the opponents. The same server continues to alternate serving courts until the game is finished, and then the opponent serves.
    [Show full text]
  • The Art of Lawn Tennis
    .;.;' .- H41m -^nra usnffl«iHHnBnHmn HIHiSB lilll Hi iwi HH IHHHRhu MB __ EsyHNHRHQBS&F mmHHHHBn^^SP mm mwHw HlHiUliH Milffliilii.ror»» MIBBiiili HHHlllliil Class Book CopigM . COHRIGHT deposit THE ART OF LAWN TENNIS WILLIAM T. TILDEN KfSO PLATE I WILLIAM T. TILDE M- Champion of the world, in action. THE ART OF LAWN TENNIS BY WILLIAM TrTILDEN %» CHAMPION OF THE WORLD WITH THIBTY ILLUSTRATIONS NEW Xlir YORK GEORGE H. DORAN COMPANY COPYRIGHT, 1921, BY GEORGE H. DORAN COMPANY PRINTED IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA APR -I 1921 _ ©CLA611413 « To E. D. K AND M. W. J. MY "BUDDIES" W. T. T. n INTRODUCTION Tennis is at once an art and a science. The game as played by such men as Norman E. Brookes, the late Anthony Wilding, William M. Johnston, and R. N. Williams is art. Yet like all true art, it has its basis in scientific methods that must be learned and learned thoroughly for a foundation before the artistic structure of a great tennis game can be con- structed. Every player who helps to attain a high degree of efficiency should have a clearly defined method of development and adhere to it. He should be certain that it is based on sound principles and, once assured of that, follow it, even though his progress seems slow and discouraging. I began tennis wrong. My strokes were wrong and my viewpoint clouded. I had no early training such as many of our American boys have at the pres- ent time. No one told me the importance of the fundamentals of the game, such as keeping the eye on the ball or correct body position and footwork.
    [Show full text]
  • THE ROGER FEDERER STORY Quest for Perfection
    THE ROGER FEDERER STORY Quest For Perfection RENÉ STAUFFER THE ROGER FEDERER STORY Quest For Perfection RENÉ STAUFFER New Chapter Press Cover and interior design: Emily Brackett, Visible Logic Originally published in Germany under the title “Das Tennis-Genie” by Pendo Verlag. © Pendo Verlag GmbH & Co. KG, Munich and Zurich, 2006 Published across the world in English by New Chapter Press, www.newchapterpressonline.com ISBN 094-2257-391 978-094-2257-397 Printed in the United States of America Contents From The Author . v Prologue: Encounter with a 15-year-old...................ix Introduction: No One Expected Him....................xiv PART I From Kempton Park to Basel . .3 A Boy Discovers Tennis . .8 Homesickness in Ecublens ............................14 The Best of All Juniors . .21 A Newcomer Climbs to the Top ........................30 New Coach, New Ways . 35 Olympic Experiences . 40 No Pain, No Gain . 44 Uproar at the Davis Cup . .49 The Man Who Beat Sampras . 53 The Taxi Driver of Biel . 57 Visit to the Top Ten . .60 Drama in South Africa...............................65 Red Dawn in China .................................70 The Grand Slam Block ...............................74 A Magic Sunday ....................................79 A Cow for the Victor . 86 Reaching for the Stars . .91 Duels in Texas . .95 An Abrupt End ....................................100 The Glittering Crowning . 104 No. 1 . .109 Samson’s Return . 116 New York, New York . .122 Setting Records Around the World.....................125 The Other Australian ...............................130 A True Champion..................................137 Fresh Tracks on Clay . .142 Three Men at the Champions Dinner . 146 An Evening in Flushing Meadows . .150 The Savior of Shanghai..............................155 Chasing Ghosts . .160 A Rivalry Is Born .
    [Show full text]
  • Shirley Park LTC News Letter – Spring 2012
    Shirley Park LTC News Letter – Spring 2012 Club Championships – Summer 2011 Mens Singles Final - Harry Ware beat Dan Hatton 6-1 7-6 It seemed that Harry Ware was in a hurry when he raced through the opening set of the Mens Singles Final against two-time former champion Dan Hatton taking it 6-1 in just 22 minutes. However, the second set proved a much closer affair. Dan struck early on by taking the first two games of a see-saw set that contained some high quality tennis and exciting rallies. Harry then broke service twice to take a 3-2 lead, but Dan returned the compliment and had a chance to take the set when serving at 5-3. Two double faults gave Harry the chance to level and, after sharing service holds, he eased through the tie-break to successfully defend his title in straight sets. Ladies Singles Final - Natalie Davis beat Kamila Morgan 6-2 6-3 This was a tight affair. Kamila came out hitting some crunching forehands but Natalie wisely kept most of her shots to Kamila's backhand in an attempt to neutralise her opponent's game. It became clear early on that Natalie’s strategy was to simply out rally her opponent with her consistency. Natalie showing great resilience broke Kamila in the fourth & sixth games to win the first set 6-2. The second set produced some stunning tennis with Kamlia using her forehand topspin to good effect. Kamila moved into a 3-1 lead and at this stage it looked we could be heading to a third set.
    [Show full text]
  • First 4 Shots Belgium
    Let’s Connect Instagram coshannessy Twitter @BrainGameTennis Facebook BrainGameTennis Website www.braingametennis.com E-Mail [email protected] The First 4 Shots Building Blocks Matches Sets Games Points No. 1 in the World YEAR PLAYER W/L MATCH WIN % 2018 Novak Djokovic 49-11 82% 2017 Rafael Nadal 67-11 86% 2016 Andy Murray 78-9 90% 2015 Novak Djokovic 82-6 93% 2014 Novak Djokovic 61-8 88% 2013 Rafael Nadal 75-7 92% 2012 Novak Djokovic 75-12 86% 2011 Novak Djokovic 70-6 92% 2010 Rafael Nadal 71-10 88% - TOTAL / AVERAGE 628 - 80 89% Building Blocks Matches = 89% Points = ? No. 1 Player: Points Won 55% YEAR PLAYER POINTS WON % 2018 N. Djokovic 54% 2017 R. Nadal 56% 2016 A. Murray 55% 2015 N. Djokovic 56% 2014 N. Djokovic 55% 2013 R. Nadal 55% 2012 N. Djokovic 55% 2011 N. Djokovic 56% 2010 R. Nadal 55% 2009 R. Federer 54% 2001 L. Hewitt 53% 2000 G. Kuerten 53% 1996 P. Sampras 53% 1991 S. Edberg 53% 2018: Top 50 Percentage Points Won Top 50: True / False More than 20% of the Top 50 in 2018 lost more points than they won? Top 50: True / False True 11/50 (22%) lost more points than they won in 2018 Top 50: 2018 Season RANKING POINTS WON POINTS PLAYED WIN % 1-10 54,424 103,105 52.79% 11-20 46,260 90,239 51.26% 21-30 42,648 83,797 50.89% 31-40 37,101 73,685 50.35% 41-50 36,832 74,261 49.60% TOTAL/AVERAGE 217,265 425,087 51.11% Average / Points Won Top 10 = 53% Top 50 = 51% 2016 Season RANKING PLAYER % POINTS WON PRIZEMONEY 1 Andy Murray 55% $13,327,822 2 Novak Djokovic 55% $12,630,465 5 Kei Nishikori 53% $4,324,963 10 Tomas Berdych 52% $2,318,756 20 Ivo Karlovic 50% $1,267,348 50 Florian Mayer 49% $695,103 Karlovic = No.
    [Show full text]
  • The First Beautiful Game
    THE FIRST BEAUTIFUL GAME Stories of obsession in Real Tennis Roman Krznaric Ronaldson Publications September 2006 CONTENTS Introduction The Wordless Conversation From Abbots to Zealots Life in Court Serving to Gentlemen The Missionary Adventures With My Father References Acknowledgements About the author Notes 2 INTRODUCTION Bent rackets, hand-sewn balls and netted windows. Painted crowns, brass bells and penthouses. Chases, railroads and giraffes. Welcome to the curious world of real tennis. Originating in medieval Europe, the court, rules and equipment have hardly changed in four centuries. Yet this book is not a chronicle of its history, nor is it a manual on technique and strategy. It is about the players and their obsession. Over the past five years I have spoken with real tennis players about their experiences of the sport, why they play and what it means to them. I learned that most of them are fanatics, some are addicts. More than a few are eccentrics. And I found their stories revealing about the art of living: whether to pursue our passions and ambitions, how to balance work and personal life, why we need respect and equality, where we can find and create beauty. This book tells those stories in their own voices. I should admit that I am one of the fanatics, an amateur player who has named three bicycles and a car after former World Champions. I first encountered real tennis in the late 1980s when a student. At the time I was dedicated to another sport that, in my ignorance, I called ‘tennis’ – the game played at Wimbledon and in parks on sunny afternoons.
    [Show full text]