DOCSLIB.ORG

Draft Environmental Assessment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Draft Environmental Assessment Draft Environmental Assessment Reaches WS-1E and WS-1F (MC-1, MC-2, and MC-3) Pima-Maricopa Irrigation Project Gila River Indian Community Maricopa County, Arizona U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation Phoenix Area Office Phoenix, Arizona July 2015 DISCLAIMER Pursuant to the requirements of 40 CFR Section 1506.5, EcoPlan Associates, Inc., declares under oath that it has no interest, financial or otherwise, in the outcome of this project. July 30, 2015 F. Bruce Brown Date Principal EcoPlan Associates, Inc. Mesa, Arizona Draft Environmental Assessment Reaches WS-1E and WS-1F (MC-1, MC-2, and MC-3) Pima-Maricopa Irrigation Project Gila River Indian Community Maricopa County, Arizona Prepared for: U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation Phoenix Area Office Phoenix, Arizona Prepared by: EcoPlan Associates, Inc. 701 W. Southern Ave., Suite 203 Mesa, AZ 85210 July 2015 Mission Statements The mission of the Department of the Interior is to protect and provide access to our Nation’s natural and cultural heritage and honor our trust responsibilities to Indian Tribes and our commitments to island communities. The mission of the Bureau of Reclamation is to manage, develop, and protect water and related resources in an environmentally and economically sound manner in the interest of the American public. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 PURPOSE AND NEED ......................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Background ................................................................................................................... 1 1.3 Purpose and Need for Action ........................................................................................ 3 1.4 Project Location ............................................................................................................ 3 1.5 Decisions to Be Made ................................................................................................... 3 1.6 Prior Compliance With NEPA ...................................................................................... 3 2.0 DESCRIPTION OF ALTERNATIVES ................................................................................ 5 2.1 No Action ...................................................................................................................... 5 2.2 Proposed Action ............................................................................................................ 5 2.2.1 Reach WS-1E .................................................................................................. 5 2.2.2 Reach WS-1F ................................................................................................... 7 2.2.3 Lateral MC-1 ................................................................................................... 7 2.2.4 Lateral MC-2 ................................................................................................... 7 2.2.5 Lateral MC-3 ................................................................................................... 8 2.2.6 Project Construction ........................................................................................ 8 2.3 Alternatives Considered But Eliminated ...................................................................... 8 2.3.1 Open Canal Delivery System Alternative ....................................................... 8 3.0 AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES ............... 9 3.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................... 9 3.2 Land Ownership, Jurisdiction, and Land Use ............................................................... 9 3.2.1 Affected Environment ..................................................................................... 9 3.2.2 Environmental Consequences ....................................................................... 10 3.3 Visual Resources ......................................................................................................... 12 3.3.1 Affected Environment ................................................................................... 12 3.3.2 Environmental Consequences ....................................................................... 12 3.4 Environmental Justice ................................................................................................. 13 3.4.1 Affected Environment ................................................................................... 13 3.4.2 Environmental Consequences ....................................................................... 14 Draft Environmental Assessment i Reaches WS-1E and WS-1F (MC-1, MC-2, and MC-3) 3.5 Socioeconomic Conditions ......................................................................................... 14 3.5.1 Affected Environment ................................................................................... 14 3.5.2 Environmental Consequences ....................................................................... 15 3.6 Indian Trust Assets ..................................................................................................... 15 3.6.1 Affected Environment ................................................................................... 15 3.6.2 Environmental Consequences ....................................................................... 15 3.7 Cultural Resources ...................................................................................................... 16 3.7.1 Affected Environment ................................................................................... 16 3.7.2 Environmental Consequences ....................................................................... 20 3.8 Geology and Soils ....................................................................................................... 24 3.8.1 Affected Environment ................................................................................... 24 3.8.2 Environmental Consequences ....................................................................... 25 3.9 Water Resources and Water Quality ........................................................................... 26 3.9.1 Affected Environment ................................................................................... 26 3.9.2 Environmental Consequences ....................................................................... 26 3.10 Floodplains and Flooding ........................................................................................... 27 3.10.1 Affected Environment ................................................................................... 27 3.10.2 Environmental Consequences ....................................................................... 28 3.11 Biological Resources .................................................................................................. 28 3.11.1 Affected Environment ................................................................................... 28 3.11.2 Environmental Consequences ....................................................................... 31 3.12 Noise ........................................................................................................................... 35 3.12.1 Affected Environment ................................................................................... 35 3.12.2 Environmental Consequences ....................................................................... 35 3.13 Air Quality .................................................................................................................. 36 3.13.1 Affected Environment ................................................................................... 36 3.13.2 Environmental Consequences ....................................................................... 37 3.14 Hazardous Materials ................................................................................................... 39 3.14.1 Affected Environment ................................................................................... 39 3.14.2 Environmental Consequences ....................................................................... 39 4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL COMMITMENTS ............................................................................ 41 5.0 CONSULTATION AND COORDINATION ..................................................................... 44 Draft Environmental Assessment ii Reaches WS-1E and WS-1F (MC-1, MC-2, and MC-3) 5.1 Agencies and Persons Contacted ................................................................................ 44 5.2 Public and Agency Comments on the Draft EA ......................................................... 44 6.0 LIST OF PREPARERS........................................................................................................ 45 7.0 RELATED ENVIRONMENTAL LAWS/DIRECTIVES ................................................... 46 8.0 LITERATURE CITED ........................................................................................................ 49 APPENDICES Appendix A Geometric Plans Showing Temporary Construction Easements and Permanent Irrigation Easements Appendix B Revised Programmatic Agreement Appendix C Concurrences with Class I Report Appendix D Concurrences with Treatment Plan Appendix E Cultural Resources Within the Area of Potential Effects
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Lower Gila Region, Arizona
    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR HUBERT WORK, Secretary UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GEORGE OTIS SMITH, Director Water-Supply Paper 498 THE LOWER GILA REGION, ARIZONA A GEOGBAPHIC, GEOLOGIC, AND HTDBOLOGIC BECONNAISSANCE WITH A GUIDE TO DESEET WATEEING PIACES BY CLYDE P. ROSS WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1923 ADDITIONAL COPIES OF THIS PUBLICATION MAT BE PROCURED FROM THE SUPERINTENDENT OF DOCUMENTS GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON, D. C. AT 50 CENTS PEE COPY PURCHASER AGREES NOT TO RESELL OR DISTRIBUTE THIS COPT FOR PROFIT. PUB. RES. 57, APPROVED MAT 11, 1822 CONTENTS. I Page. Preface, by O. E. Melnzer_____________ __ xr Introduction_ _ ___ __ _ 1 Location and extent of the region_____._________ _ J. Scope of the report- 1 Plan _________________________________ 1 General chapters _ __ ___ _ '. , 1 ' Route'descriptions and logs ___ __ _ 2 Chapter on watering places _ , 3 Maps_____________,_______,_______._____ 3 Acknowledgments ______________'- __________,______ 4 General features of the region___ _ ______ _ ., _ _ 4 Climate__,_______________________________ 4 History _____'_____________________________,_ 7 Industrial development___ ____ _ _ _ __ _ 12 Mining __________________________________ 12 Agriculture__-_______'.____________________ 13 Stock raising __ 15 Flora _____________________________________ 15 Fauna _________________________ ,_________ 16 Topography . _ ___ _, 17 Geology_____________ _ _ '. ___ 19 Bock formations. _ _ '. __ '_ ----,----- 20 Basal complex___________, _____ 1 L __. 20 Tertiary lavas ___________________ _____ 21 Tertiary sedimentary formations___T_____1___,r 23 Quaternary sedimentary formations _'__ _ r- 24 > Quaternary basalt ______________._________ 27 Structure _______________________ ______ 27 Geologic history _____ _____________ _ _____ 28 Early pre-Cambrian time______________________ .
    [Show full text]
  • NOVEMBER 2, 2018 Halloween Fun Hits GRIC with Departments and Programs Joining the Fun
    THE GRIN VOL. 21, NO. 21 GILA RIVER INDIAN NEWS || www.GRICNEWS.org NOVEMBER 2, 2018 Halloween fun hits GRIC with departments and programs joining the fun Trail of Doom participants make their way across the various candy sta- tions at the trunk or treat activity. Christopher Lomahquahu/GRIN Christopher Lomahquahu as pint-sized ghouls, goblins and a Gila River Indian News few super heroes descended upon the Gila River Indian Community The Gila River Indian Com- Governance Center for the annual munity always gets in the Hallow- trick or treat event on Oct. 29. een spirit with schools, tribal de- partments and programs passing out candy and treats. Continued on Page 11 Children from schools across the Community take part in the annual trick or treat event at the Governance Center It was a howling good time, on Oct. 29. Christopher Lomahquahu/GRIN GRPD recognizes outstanding employees Aaron J. Tohtsoni ing before welcoming remarks for her work as a civilian inves- Gila River Indian News from Police Chief Kathleen El- tigator, a newly created position, The Gila River Police De- liot. handling 240 calls of service and partment held an award ceremony “You come to work every day 44 follow-up calls during her first on Oct. 18 in Sacaton recognizing and do an outstanding job, you year. employees and officers for their recognize what is going on and For the Community Service hard work and dedication during you’re here because it’s in your Award, Squad C was recognized the 2017 work year. In total, 20 heart to come here and do the best for service done during the 2017 employees were presented with that you can,” said Chief Elliot to holiday season, helping cleanup awards.
    [Show full text]
  • United States Department of the Interior U.S
    United States Department of the Interior U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 2321 West Royal Palm Road, Suite 103 Phoenix, Arizona 85021-4951 Telephone: (602) 242-0210 FAX: (602) 242-2513 In Reply Refer To: AESO/SE 22410-2007-F-0196 January 29, 2009 Memorandum To: Field Manager, Yuma Field Office, Bureau of Land Management, Yuma, Arizona From: Field Supervisor Subject: Biological Opinion for the Yuma Field Office Resource Management Plan Thank you for your request for formal consultation with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) pursuant to section 7 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1531-1544), as amended (Act). Your request for formal consultation regarding effects of the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Yuma Field Office Resource Management Plan (RMP) was dated November 26, 2007, and received by us on November 27, 2007. At issue are impacts that may result from the RMP on the following federally-listed species: • razorback sucker (Xyrauchen texanus) and its critical habitat; • desert tortoise – Mohave Desert population (Gopherus agassizii); • Yuma clapper rail (Rallus longirostris yumanensis); and, • southwestern willow flycatcher (Empidonax traillii extimus). We concur with your effects determination of “may affect, not likely to adversely affect” for the Sonoran pronghorn (Antilocapra americanus sonoriensis). Our rationale is presented in Appendix A. The November 26, 2007, memorandum also requested concurrence regarding your determination that implementation of the proposed action may affect, but is not likely to contribute to the need to list the candidate western yellow-billed cuckoo (Coccyzus americanus). Other than the applicable conservation measures included in the proposed action (Appendix B), this species is not addressed in this biological opinion (BO).
    [Show full text]
  • Invitation to Bid
    INVITATION TO BID GILA RIVER INDIAN COMMUNITY District 5 Casa Blanca Water Storage Tank Project Project No. DPW 09-23 Sealed bids will be received by Gila River Indian Community, Property and Supply, Attn: Geneva Gooden, Procurement Director, 315 W. Casa Blanca Road, Sacaton, AZ 85247, until January 29, 2:00 p.m. (AZ time), 2010. Bids received after this time will not be accepted. On January 29,2010, at 3:00 p.m. (AZ time), the sealed bids will be publicly opened, read aloud, and accepted for consideration at the Gila River Indian Community, Department of Public Works, Engineering Services Division, Conference Room, 186 S. Skill Center Road, Sacaton, Arizona, 85247. Description of the Work: The Gila River Indian Community (GRIC), Department of Public Works is seeking a construction firm to construct a 500,000 gallon water storage tank. The work includes, but is not limited to, mobilization of equipment, initial construction surveys, installation of a 500,000 gallon welded or bolted steel water storage tank with associated appurtenances, required site grading, relocation of earth roadway, construction and relocation of various sized waterlines, excavation of trenches, completion of connections to existing water mains, installation of valves and boxes, trench backfill, compaction of trenches, adjustment of valve covers, preparation of "As-Built" surveys (in electronic format) of the water storage tank and water main construction, testing and disinfecting the new water storage tank, pressure testing, chlorination of new water lines, site clean-up, and demobilization. This work will be performed near the Community of Casa Blanca, in District 5 within the Gila River Indian Community, Pinal County, Arizona.
    [Show full text]
  • Akimel O'odham
    Akimel O’odham - Pee Posh OUR COMMUNITY OUR FUTURE Governor Lieutenant Governor William Rhodes Jennifer Allison-Ray ANew Direction CONTENTS www.gric.nsn.us | FALL 2007 4 Community Profi le 13 Tribal Government + Executive Offi ce 5 History + Legislative Offi ce + Judicial Offi ce + Pre-History + Early Contact 16 Community Portfolio + 19th and 20th Centuries 9 Water Settlement 17 Tribal Enterprises 10 Tribal Culture 23 Tribal Community 27 Tribal Districts View of Sacaton Mountains from Olberg Gila River farms - District 2, Blackwater Bridge District 2 A MESSAGE FROM THE GOVERNOR We welcome you to experience the rug- ged, awe-inspiring vistas of the South- west and the rich heritage of the Akimel O’odham (Pima) and Pee-Posh (Mari- copa). Historically, the strength of our culture has been the community spirit, industriousness, and maintaining our traditions and languages. Today, we con- tinue to face the challenge of preserving these core values while also meeting the demands of a rapidly changing world. Throughout Gila River’s history, our tribe has made innumerable contribu- tions and will continue to play an inte- gral role in the decades ahead. Governor William R. Rhodes 5 COMMUNITYFACTSHEET COMMUNITY PROFILE The Gila River Indian Community is located on 372,000 acres in south-central Arizona, south of Phoenix, Tempe, and Chandler. The reservation was established by an act of Congress in 1859. The Tribal administrative offi ces and departments are located in Sacaton, and serve residents throughout the seven community districts. The Gila River casinos are both owned and managed by the Gila River Indian Com- munity.
    [Show full text]
  • Pinal County, Arizona
    Profile: Pinal County, Arizona Pinal County was formed from portions of Maricopa and Pima counties on Feb. 1, 1875, in response to the petition of residents of the upper Gila River Valley, as "Act #1" of the Eighth Territorial Legislature. Florence, established in 1866, was designated and has remained the county seat. The county encompasses 5,374 square miles, of which 4.5 are water. In both economy and geography, Pinal County has two distinct regions. The eastern portion is characterized by mountains with elevations to 6,000 feet and copper mining. The western area is primarily low desert valleys and irrigatedagriculture. The communities of Mammoth, Oracle, San Manuel, and Kearny have traditionally been active in copper mining, smelting, milling and refining. Arizona City, Eloy, Maricopa, Picacho, Red Rock and Stanfield have agriculture based-economies. Apache Junction, Arizona City, Coolidge, Eloy, and particularly Casa Grande have diversified their economic base to include manufacturing, trade and services. This expansion and diversification has been facilitated by their location in the major growth corridor between Phoenix and Tucson near the junction of I-10 and I-8, except for Apache Junction, which is to the east of burgeoning Mesa. Most of the southern ¾ of Pinal County and a small area in Apache Junction are designated as Enterprise Zones. The county is home to many interesting attractions, including the Old West Highway 60, Casa Grande Ruins National Monument, Picacho Peak State Park, Picacho Reservoir, Boyce Thompson Southwestern Arboretum, Oracle State Park and Columbia University’s Biosphere II, McFarland State Park, Lost Dutchman State Park, Skydive Arizona, the world’s largest skydiving drop-zone, and the Florence Historical District, with 120 buildings on the National Register.
    [Show full text]
  • Issues Concerning Phreatophyte Clearing, Revegetation, and Water Savings Along the Gila River, Arizona William L
    University of South Carolina Scholar Commons Faculty Publications Geography, Department of 4-1-1984 Issues Concerning Phreatophyte Clearing, Revegetation, and Water Savings Along the Gila River, Arizona William L. Graf University of South Carolina - Columbia, [email protected] Duncan T. Patten Bonnie Turner Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarcommons.sc.edu/geog_facpub Part of the Geography Commons Publication Info 1984, pages Cover-69. This Paper is brought to you for free and open access by the Geography, Department of at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ISSUES CONCERNING PHREATOPHYTE CLEARING, REVEGETATION, AND WATER-SAVINGS ALONG THE GILA RIVER, ARIZONA W.... LGraf Duncan T. Patten Bonnie Turner Submitted by the Forum In partial fu1fliiment of U. S.. Army Corps of Engineer. Contract DACW09-83-M-2823 April 1984 -------- ISSUES CONCERNING PHREATOPHYTE CLEARING, REVEGETATION, AND WATER SAVINGS ALONG THE GILA RIVER, ARIZONA William L. Graf Department of Geography Duncan T. Patten Center for Environmental Studies Bonnie Turner Center for Environmental Studies Arizona State University Tempe, Arizona 85287 A report submitted in partial fulfillment of U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Contract DACW09-83-M-2623. April 1984 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY A detailed analysis of the published results of the U. S. Geological Survey Phreatophyte Project conducted in the area of interest for the Corps of Engineers Camelsback Dam study provides the following results. It appears that the figure of 18.53 inches per year for water savings from phreatophyte clearing along the Gila River in southeast Arizona should not be used for predicting potential water salvage because of large sampling errors, measurement errors, and the inherent variability of the natural processes of evapotranspiration.
    [Show full text]
  • IN the GRIN Health & Wellness.....Page 7 Letters & Opinions
    “Serving all seven districts of the Gila River Indian Community” Blackwater - Hashen Kehk - Gu U Ki - Santan - Casa Blanca - Komatke - Maricopa Colony DECEMBER 20, 2013 WWW.GILARIVER.ORG/NEWS VOL. 16, NO. 20 Past leaders recall fight for water rights during 9th anniversary Change Service Requested AZ 85147 Sacaton, Box 459 P.O. News Gila River Indian By Roberto A. Jackson served the Community for 30 years, Gila River Indian News gave a legal perspective on the ne- The Community relived the gotiations and said that the water tireless crusade for water rights and rights issue unified the Community. celebrated the determination of past “[Water rights] has been a rallying leaders at the Water Rights Celebra- cry from all the Community mem- tion, marking nine years since the bers since I started working here in historic settlement was reached. 1972,” said Lewis. Held at the Vah-Ki Multipur- Thomas reiterated Lewis’s pose Building in District 5 on Dec. point. 10, the celebration included an im- “As I look back on the former leaders and those who are not here, it pressive array of individuals, as well PRESORTED Permit No. 25 No. Permit STANDARD U.S. Postage U.S. as four former GRIC governors, was like passing a baton between all AZ Sacaton, who described their experiences Roberto A. Jackson/GRIN of us,” she said. PAID and the key moments that led to the Back from left: former Gov. Richard Narcia, former Gov. Donald Special recognition was paid to signing of the Arizona Water Settle- R. Antone, Gov. Gregory Mendoza, former counsel Rodney Lewis, the many elders who were steadfast ment Act of Dec.
    [Show full text]
  • GILA RIVER INDIAN COMMUNITY PO Box 2138 / 525 W
    GILA RIVER INDIAN COMMUNITY PO Box 2138 / 525 W. GU U KI ROAD Sacaton, Arizona, 85147 COMMUNITY COUNCIL 2018 COUNCIL MEETING SCHEDULE Wednesday(s) 9:00 a.m. Council Chambers, Governance Center Sacaton, Arizona January 3, 2018 July 4, 2018 January 17, 2018 July 18, 2018 February 7, 2018 August 1, 2018 February 21, 2018 August 15, 2018 March 7, 2018 September 5, 2018 March 21, 2018 September 19. 2018 April 4, 2018 October 3, 2018 April 18, 2018 October 17, 2018 May 2, 2018 November 7, 2018 May 16, 2018 November 21, 2018 June 6, 2018 December 5, 2018 June 20, 2018 December 19, 2018 All documentation (Reports, Resolutions, Ordinances, PowerPoints, Videos, etc) submitted for Community Council review MUST be submitted to the Council Secretary NO LATER THAN 12:00 NOON THE THURSDAY PRIOR TO THE COUNCIL MEETING DATE. Presenters are responsible for providing ONE (1) ELECTRONIC COPY AND ONE (1) HARD COPY of all material for Community Council review/consideration. LATE MATERIAL WILL NOT GO OUT IN COMMUNITY COUNCIL PACKETS. THE COUNCIL SECRETARY’S OFFICE IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR CALLING AND REMINDING DEPARTMENT/PROGRAMS, ENTITIES, OR INDIVIDUALS TO SUBMIT MATERIALS NOR IS SHE RESPONSIBLE FOR MAKING COPIES OF MATERIAL FOR THE COMMUNITY COUNCIL PACKETS. ABSOLUTELY NO POWERPOINTS OR VIDEOS WILL BE ACCEPTED THE DAY OF THE COUNCIL MEETING. Stephen R. Lewis, Governor Shannon White, Council Secretary Robert Stone, Lt. Governor Robert Keller, Treasurer COUNCIL MEMBERS District 1: Arzie Hogg District 5: Janice Stewart Joey Whitman Marlin Dixon District 2: Carol A. Schurz Franklin Pablo, Sr. District 3: Carolyn Williams Vacant Rodney Jackson District 6: Anthony Villareal, Sr.
    [Show full text]
  • 8/28/2013 San Manuel Miner
    USA Swimming in San Manuel Vol. 59 No. 35 • Wednesday, August 28, 2013 • 50¢ Periodicals Postage Paid at San Manuel, Ariz. 85631 Page 9 PAGE 2 SAN MANUEL MINER, SAN MANUEL, ARIZONA AUGUST 28, 2013 Obituaries Wyatt Douglas Althoff October 6, 1986 - August 17, 2013 Wyatt Douglas Althoff, Grandparents, Bob and (John) Smith, Apache family. 26, passed away on August Jessie Miller, Oracle, AZ; Junction, AZ; Judy (Jeff) Wyatt was born into 17, 2013, in a boating Ken and Nancy Althoff, Tujetsch, Aliquippa, PA, as rodeo and he was a natural, accident on Roosevelt Payson, AZ, and Zelma well as 17 first cousins. winning countless rodeos Lake. He was born Ann (David) Homan, There was a very special and championships. After on October 6, 1986, in Gatesville, TX. place in Wyatt’s heart for graduating from Canyon Tucson, AZ. Wyatt is also survived by Joe and Shelly Brown, del Oro High School in Wyatt is survived by his many aunts and uncles; Tonto Basin, AZ, and their Oro Valley, AZ, he went mother, Linda (Casey) Alan (Stella) Miller, children, Trevor “TJ” and on to earn his Bachelor Smith of Gilbert, AZ; his Oracle, AZ; Greg (Susan) Chancy, whom Wyatt of Science Degree in father, Brent (Marianne) Althoff , Robyn Althoff, considered his second Agricultural Economics Althoff of Payson, AZ; and Bo (Heather) Althoff, his loving girlfriend, all of Payson, AZ; Mary Kelsey Early, daughter of (Bill) Sturgeon, Taylor, Scott and Jerri Early, of AZ; Kevin (Susan) Althoff, San Manuel Miner Maricopa, AZ; and his Crawford, TX; Jacqueline P.O. Box 60, San Manuel, Arizona 85631 Phone: (520) 385-2266 • Fax: (520) 385-4666 VISIT MY WEB SITE! USPS 480-500 Wyatt Althoff is intense as he prepares to wrestle this steer to the ground.
    [Show full text]
  • Sacaton Bridge Rebuilt and Reopened
    “Serving all seven districts of the Gila River Indian Community” Blackwater - Hashen Kehk - Gu U Ki - Santan - Casa Blanca - Komatke - Maricopa Colony MAY 1, 2015 WWW.GILARIVER.ORG/NEWS VOL. 18, NO. 09 Change Service Requested AZ 85147 Sacaton, Box 459 P.O. News Gila River Indian Sacaton Bridge Rebuilt and Reopened By Christopher Lomahquahu Gila River Indian News Crossing the Gila River just got a bit safer for commuters traveling in and out of Sacaton to the north. For the Community, rebuilding the Sacaton Bridge was an im- pressive undertaking that involved multiple agencies. Gov. Stephen Roe Lewis and Lt Gov. Monica L. Antone greeted Community members and project representatives to cut PRESORTED Permit No. 25 No. Permit STANDARD U.S. Postage U.S. the ribbon on the new bridge April 16. AZ Sacaton, GRICDOT determined the old bridge, PAID built in 1964, was in need of replacement. It has endured times when the Gila River was flowing at it highest, and the time in 1992 when the Gila River flooded over. Christopher Lomahquahu/GRIN Steven Johnson, a Senior Civil En- Tribal leaders and Community elders met with GRICDOT, FHWA and construction workers to The Strategic Highway Re- gineer at GRICDOT, said, “We set out to cut the ribbon on the new Sacaton bridge, which opened April 16. search Program 2 grant gave make the bridge a lot safer according to fed- over the bridge. GRICDOT set a goal to the doors for funding specific to building of $500,000 for the Community’s eral standards.” complete the bridge within six months.
    [Show full text]
  • Dripping Springs Parcel, Gila and Pinal Counties, Arizona
    ECOLOGICAL OVERVIEW DRIPPING SPRINGS PARCEL GILA AND PINAL COUNTIES, ARIZONA Resolution Copper Prepared for: 102 Magma Heights – Superior, Arizona 85173 Project Number: 807.98 13 06 December 2016 WestLand Resources, Inc. 4001 E. Paradise Falls Drive Tucson, Arizona 85712 5202069585 Dripping Springs Parcel - Gila and Pinal Counties, Arizona Ecological Overview TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY....................................................................................................................... ES-1 1. INTRODUCTION AND METHODS ................................................................................................ 1 1.1. Purpose and Organization of Report ............................................................................................ 1 1.2. Methods and Approach ................................................................................................................... 1 2. REGIONAL SETTING .......................................................................................................................... 3 3. PROPERTY AND ADJACENT LAND USES .................................................................................. 4 4. PHYSICAL RESOURCES ...................................................................................................................... 5 4.1. Landform and Topography ............................................................................................................. 5 4.2. Geology and Geomorphology .......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]