• Abstract and Figures
• Public Full-text

View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by MPG.PuRe Contextuality as a resource for models of quantum computation on qubits Juan Bermejo-Vega1;2, Nicolas Delfosse3;4, Dan E. Browne5, Cihan Okay6, Robert Raussendorf71 1 1: Dahlem Center for Complex Quantum Systems, Freie Universit¨at Berlin, 14195 Berlin, Germany, 2: Max-Planck Institut f¨urQuantum Optics, Theory Division, 85748 Garching, Germany, 3: Institute for Quantum Information and Matter, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91125, USA, 4: Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of California, Riverside, California 92521, USA, 5: Department of Physics and Astronomy, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom, 6: Department of Mathematics, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario N6A 5B7, Canada, 7: Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z1, Canada A central question in quantum computation is to identify the resources that are responsible for quantum speed-up. Quantum contextuality has been recently shown to be a resource for quan- tum computation with magic states for odd-prime dimensional qudits and two-dimensional systems with real wavefunctions. The phenomenon of state-independent contextuality poses a priori an ob- struction to characterizing the case of regular qubits, the fundamental building block of quantum computation. Here, we establish contextuality of magic states as a necessary resource for a large class of quantum computation schemes on qubits. We illustrate our result with a concrete scheme related to measurement-based quantum computation. The model of quantum computation by state injection Condition (C1) constitutes a minimal principle that (QCSI) [1] is a leading paradigm of fault-tolerance quan- unifies, simplifies and extends the quopit [5] and rebit tum computation. Therein, quantum gates are restricted [6] settings. While seemingly a weak constraint, it ex- to belong to a small set of classically simulable gates, cludes the possibility of Mermin-type state-independent called Clifford gates [2], that admit simple fault-tolerant contextuality [7,8] among the available measurements implementations [3]. Universal quantum computation is (see Lemma1 below). A priori, the absence of state- achieved via injection of \magic states" [1], which are the independent contextuality comes at a price. Namely, for source of quantum computational power of the model. any QCSI scheme MO on n ≥ 2 qubits, not all n-qubit A central question in QCSI is to characterize the phys- Pauli observables can be measured. Thus, the question ical properties that magic states need to exhibit in order arises of whether this limits access to all n qubits for to serve as universal resources. In this regard, quantum measurement. As we show in this Letter, this does not contextuality has recently been established as a necessary have to be the case. resource for QCSI. This was first achieved for quopit sys- Addressing this question, we impose tomographic com- tems [4,5], where the local Hilbert space dimension is an pleteness as our technical condition for a true n-qubit odd prime power, and subsequently for local dimension QCSI scheme, cf. (C2). It means that any quantum state two with the case of rebits [6]. In the latter, the density can be fully measured given sufficiently many copies. The matrix is constrained to be real at all times. rebit scheme [6], for example, does not satisfy this. In this Letter we ask \Can contextuality be established One of our results is that for any number n of qubits as a computational resource for QCSI on qubits?". This there exists a QCSI scheme that satisfies both condi- is not a straightforward extension of the quopit case be- tions (C1) and (C2). The reason why both conditions cause the multiqubit setting is complicated by the pres- can simultaneously hold lies in a fundamental distinction ence of state-independent contextuality among Pauli ob- between observables that can be measured directly in a servables [7,8]. Consequently, every quantum state of given qubit QCSI scheme from those that can only be in- n ≥ 2 qubits is contextual with respect to Pauli mea- ferred by measurement of other observables. The result- surements, including the completely mixed one [5]. It is ing qubit QCSI schemes resemble their quopit counter- thus clear that contextuality of magic states alone cannot parts [4,5] in the absence of state-independent contextu- be a computational resource for every QCSI scheme on ality, yet have full tomographic power for the multiqubit arXiv:1610.08529v3 [quant-ph] 25 Sep 2017 qubits. setting. Yet, there exist qubit QCSI schemes for which con- The main result of this Letter is Theorem1. It says textuality of magic states is a resource, and we identify that if the initial (magic) states of a qubit QCSI scheme them in this Letter. Specifically, we consider qubit QCSI are describable by a noncontextual hidden variable model schemes MO that satisfy the following two constraints: (NCHVM) it becomes fundamentally impossible to im- (C1) Resource character. There exists a quantum state plement a universal set of gates. We highlight that The- that does not exhibit contextuality with respect to orem1 applies generally to any scheme fulfilling the con- measurements available in MO. dition (C1), including that of Ref. [6]. The condition (C1) plays a pivotal role in our analysis. (C2) Tomographic completeness. For any state ρ, the ex- It is clear that contextuality of the magic states can be pectation value of any Pauli observable can be in- a resource only if condition (C1) holds. In this Letter ferred via the allowed operations of the scheme. we establish the converse, namely that contextuality of The motivation for these constraints is the following. the magic states is a resource for QCSI if condition (C1) 2 holds. Therefore, condition (C1) is the structural element X1 X2 XX that unifies the previously discussed quopit [5] and rebit inferable observables [6] case, and the qubit scenarios discussed here. Together, condition (C1) and Theorem1 characterize the contex- Z2 Z1 ZZ tuality types that are needed in quantum computation via state injection, showing that state-dependent contex- directly measurable observables tuality with respect to Pauli observables is a universality resource. non-inferable XZ ZX YY observable As a final remark, we note that the measurements available in QCSI schemes satisfying (C1) preserve Figure 1. We consider an example scheme M on two positivity of suitable Wigner functions [9]. O qubits with O = fX1;X2;Z1;Z2g. Straight lines connect maximal sets of jointly inferable observables. Here, the cor- Setting.|An n-qubit Pauli observable Ta is a hermi- relator X1X2 (Z1Z2) is not in O but can be inferred by tian operator with ±1 eigenvalues of form measuring X1;X2 (Z1;Z2) and multiplying their outcomes. n n (This scheme is reminiscent of the syndrome measurement of aX O aZi O j subsystem codes [10].) Yet, X1X2 cannot be inferred jointly Ta := ξ(a)Z(aZ )X(aX ) := ξ(a) Z X ; (1) i j with Z1Z2 because a forbidden measurement of X1;X2;Z1;Z2 i=1 j=1 would be required to reproduce all quantum correlations, but after measuring, e.g., Z1 and Z2 to infer Z1Z2 the outcome where a := (aZ ; aX ) is a 2n-bit string and ξ(a) is a phase. statistics of X1X2 become uniformly random. Similarly, X1Z2 Pauli observables define an operator basis that we call Tn. and Z1X2 can be separately inferred but not jointly. Further, YY cannot be inferred (observables in O cannot distinguish A qubit scheme MO of quantum computation via its eigenstates). state injection (QCSI) consists of a resource M of ini- tial \magic" states and 3 kinds of allowed operations: 1. Measurement of any Pauli observable in a set O. fλν gν2S of value assignment functions λν : I ! {±1g that fulfill: 2. A group G of \free" Clifford gates that preserve O via conjugation up to a global phase. (i) For any λν 2 Λ and M 2 J the real numbers fλν (A)gA2M are compatible eigenvalues: i.e. there 3. Classical processing and feedforward. exists a quantum state j i such that Adaptive circuits of operations 1-3 may be combined with Aj i = λ (A)j i; 8A 2 M: (3) classical postprocessing in order to simulate measure- ν ments of Pauli observables that are not in O (cf. Fig.1). (ii) The distribution qρ satisfies We name the latter \inferable" and let I be the superset of O defined by them. Analogously, we let J be the set of X hAiρ = tr(Aρ) = λν (A)qρ(ν); 8A 2 I (4) sets of compatible Pauli observables that can be inferred ν2S jointly, which define the \contexts" of our computational model. As shown in Fig.1, not every set of compatible The state ρ is said to be \contextual" or to \exhibit con- Pauli observables is necessarily in J . Yet, A 2 I implies textuality" if no NCHVM with respect to MO exists. that fAg 2 J . Furthermore, for any pair of observables Qubit QCSI for which all possible inputs exhibit fA; Bg 2 J and α 2 R, the observables AB, αA can be inferred jointly by measuring A; B, since the eigenvalues contextuality are forbidden by (C1). Specifically, in this of the latter determine those of the former. Hence, Letter, O must be a strict subset of Tn. fA; Bg 2 J ) fA; B; AB; αAg 2 J ; 8α 2 R: (2) Main result.|We now establish contextuality as a re- source for quantum computational universality for all Constraint (C2) holds if and only if Tn ⊂ I, i.e., if and qubit QCSI schemes that fulfill (C1).

Load more

  6

Copy Link