The designation of geographical entities in this book, and the presentation of the material, do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of IUCN or any of the funding organizations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries.

The views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect those of IUCN.

Published by: IUCN/SSC Reintroduction Specialist Group & Environment Agency-Abu Dhabi

Copyright: © 2018 IUCN, International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources

Reproduction of this publication for educational or other non-commercial purposes is authorized without prior written permission from the copyright holder provided the source is fully acknowledged.

Reproduction of this publication for resale or other commercial purposes is prohibited without prior written permission of the copyright holder.

Citation: Soorae, P. S. (ed.) (2018). Global Reintroduction Perspectives: 2018. Case studies from around the globe. IUCN/SSC Reintroduction Specialist Group, Gland, Switzerland and Environment Agency, Abu Dhabi, UAE. xiv + 286pp.

6th Edition

ISBN: 978-2-8317-1901-6 (PDF) 978-2-8317-1902-3 (print edition)

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.CH.2018.08.en

Cover photo: Clockwise starting from top-left: I. Reticulated python, Singapore © ACRES II. Trout cod, Australia © Gunther Schmida (Murray-Darling Basin Authority) III. -spotted mountain newt, Iran © M. Sharifi IV. Scimitar-horned oryx, Chad © Justin Chuven V. Oregon silverspot butterfly, USA © U.S. and Wildlife Service VI. Two-colored cymbidium orchid, Singapore © Tim Wing Yam VII. Mauritius fody, Mauritius © Jacques de Spéville

Cover design & layout by: Pritpal S. Soorae, IUCN/SSC Reintroduction Specialist Group

Printed by: Arafah Printing Press LLC, Abu Dhabi, UAE

Download at: www.iucnsscrsg.org www.iucn.org/resources/publications

ii

Conservation introductions of the Running River into Deception and Puzzle Creeks, Australia

Karl G. Moy1, Jason Schaffer2, Mark Lintermans1 & Peter J. Unmack1

1 - Institute for Applied Ecology, University of Canberra ACT 2617, Australia [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] 2 - Tropwater, James Cook University Canberra QLD 4811 4811, Australia [email protected]

Introduction Running River rainbowfish ( sp.) (RRR) was recently identified as a unique taxon by Unmack and Hammer (2016) and is confined to a 13 km stretch of Running River between two gorges. Running River is a perennial tributary of the Burdekin River in northeastern Queensland, Australia and alternates between a broad valley with a sand based channel and deep gorges with cascades and deep pools. An introduced population of the widespread eastern rainbowfish () was detected above the uppermost gorge and subsequent sampling confirmed they had moved downstream and were hybridizing with RRR. Thus hybridization is the key threatening process for RRR. Although it has been identified as unique, RRR is not yet taxonomically described and as a result is ineligible for Australian federal conservation listing. However, the Australian Society for Fish Biology listed the species as critically endangered in 2016, following IUCN criteria.

Puzzle and Deception creeks are tributaries of Running River with permanent water which lacked rainbowfish (two other native species were present). They were identified as key introduction sites because they are in the same catchment as RRR, large waterfalls prevent upstream colonization of introduced rainbowfish and they are on land managed by the Australian Wildlife Conservancy.

Goals Goal 1: Establishment of two wild, self-sustaining populations secured against introgressive hybridization with other rainbowfish. Goal 2: Allelic diversity of new populations represents allelic diversity of broodstock. Goal 3: Establish a large captive-breeding group to conserve genetic diversity. Goal 4: To demonstrate that conservation actions for smaller species do not require large budgets and that interest groups in the aquarium hobby can substantially contribute to successful conservation actions.

Success Indicators Indicator 1: Fish introduced into Deception and Puzzle Creeks survive in sufficient numbers to maintain the genetic diversity that was present within the brood stock. Indicator 2: Introduced fish survive to maturity and successfully spawn.

34 Fishes

Indicator 3: Wild spawned offspring successfully recruit within the new habitat. Indicator 4: Introduced populations increase in abundance. Indicator 5: Fish disperse to entire potentially accessible range. Running River rainbowfish © Michael Jones

Project Summary Feasibility: The objective of this project was to prevent extinction of RRR. Although RRR is not commercially important, it is kept by aquarium hobbyists worldwide and its decline grabbed the attention of both national and international aquarium hobbyists. Introgressive hybridization between RRR and eastern rainbowfish is the primary cause for its impending extinction. Due to the nature of the threat, wild translocated populations secured against invasion by other rainbowfish needed to be established as the removal of the exotic population of eastern rainbowfish and hybrids is not possible. Fortunately, the two creeks identified as introduction sites were located on land owned by the Australian Wildlife Conservancy; a private conservation agency which has been a critical partner in the conservation of RRR.

Implementation: In 2015, introgressive hybridization was identified between RRR and eastern rainbowfish. Researchers then took a number of RRR into captivity and transported them to the University of Canberra to be used in a captive-breeding and stocking program for conservation. A crowdfunding campaign was then set up through the University of Canberra foundation with assistance from the Australian New Guinea Fishes Association to raise money to genotype the captive fish. Eighty-four fish were genotyped to identify and remove any hybrids, then set up in spawning groups to maximize genetic diversity in the offspring. Screening identified two F1 hybrids which were removed. From the remaining fish, approximately 4,000 fish were produced and released into Deception and Puzzle Creeks. Fish were raised at the University of Canberra for 2 - 3 months before being shipped to James Cook University in Townsville where they were placed in ponds for grow out before release. Releases into Deception Creek took place between November 2016 and January 2017, while Puzzle Creek releases took place in May 2017. Before being released, fish were kept overnight in a holding net at the release site.

Post-release monitoring: Released fish were monitored using snorkel surveys in the days following release and several months after release for Deception Creek. Short-term monitoring for Deception Creek (up to ~3 weeks after release) confirmed that fish survived and began reproducing. Short-term monitoring also confirmed strong survival of wild spawned RRR in the new habitat.

35 Fishes

Follow-up monitoring in Deception Creek in May 2017 confirmed that recruitment had been occurring continuously since their initial release, with the presence of fish less than three weeks old confirmed on the first snorkel survey. Surveys suggested that populations had established and were increasing rapidly. Surveys up and Monitoring of Running River rainbowfish © Cameron Laird downstream from release sites suggest that fish have moved approximately 2 km in both directions beyond the release reach and should continue to expand in range. No monitoring has been conducted in Puzzle Creek yet, but surveys are scheduled for October 2017.

Some first generation individuals were retained in liquid nitrogen from Deception Creek in May for future genetic work to assess how well genetic diversity has been maintained.

Major difficulties faced Rapid change in genetic integrity - decline of RRR was first noticed in 2015 and by 2017 the species appeared to be quite introgressed with eastern rainbowfish. As RRR was only identified as a unique taxa in 2015, and was undescribed when conservation efforts were first initiated, the project was not considered eligible for any federal or state funding. Without federal or state support, funding for the project was limited. While introductions of freshwater fish for recreational and conservation are common worldwide, knowledge regarding the best practices to follow for a successful release is relatively scarce for small-bodied species. Remote location of the project.

Major lessons learned Lack of monitoring of many Australian freshwater fish species with limited ranges is likely to lead to unnoticed species declines/loss, (the decline of RRR was only noticed fortuitously). Declines can be rapid. Community support via crowd funding can provide critical resources for conservation actions. On ground actions are critical. In some instances, government responses are too slow to be effective.

36 Fishes

Success of project

Highly Successful Successful Partially Successful Failure √

Reason(s) for success/failure: The adaptability of rainbowfish as a group; broad dietary requirements, wide tolerances of environmental variables, high fecundity, young age at maturity and simple spawning requirements. Collaborations between the University of Canberra, James Cook University, Flinders University, Macquarie University, Australian Wildlife Conservancy and generous donations from aquarium clubs the world over provided the necessary resources and funding required for this project to be successful. Releases in Deception Creek took place during late spring - early summer, a period of increased growth and spawning activity for most rainbowfish species. Releases into Puzzle Creek took place in late autumn, the effect of releasing fish during this period are not yet known. Deception and Puzzle Creeks were in near-pristine condition, being situated on a private nature reserve. Quick response with financial support from aquarium clubs and individuals around the world via crowd funding provided the critical funds need to conduct the initial genetic work to choose breeders which was critical to success.

References Unmack, P.J. (2016) Update on saving Running River Rainbowfish. Fishes of Sahul 30(3): 1025-1032.

Unmack, P.J. & Hammer, M.P. (2016) Burdekin rainbowfish on the verge of disappearing from the Running River! Fishes of Sahul 29(4): 933-937.

37