Deliverable 11: Environmental Marginal Cost Case Studies
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
COMPETITIVE AND SUSTAINABLE GROWTH (GROWTH) PROGRAMME UNITE UNIfication of accounts and marginal costs for Transport Efficiency Deliverable 11 Environmental Marginal Cost Case Studies Version 2.0 24 January 2003 Authors: Peter Bickel, Stephan Schmid (IER), Juha Tervonen, Kari Hämekoski, Tomas Otterström, Peter Anton (EKONO), Riccardo Enei, Gianluca Leone (ISIS), Pauline van Donselaar, H. Carmigchelt (NEI) with contributions from partners Contract: 1999-AM.11157 Project Co-ordinator: ITS, University of Leeds Funded by the European Commission 5th Framework – Transport RTD UNITE Partner Organisations ITS/UNIVLEEDS (UK), DIW (De), NEI (Nl), CES/KUL (Be), TIS.PT (Pt), IWW/UNIKARL (De), VTI (Se), IER/USTUTT (De), CERAS/ENPC (Fr), HERRY (Au), EIET/ULPGC (Es), ISIS (It), STRATEC (Be), SYSTEMA (Gr), JP-TRANSPLAN (Fi), VATT (Fi), ECOPLAN (Ch), INFRAS (Ch), EKI (Se) UNITE 1999-AM.11157 UNIfication of accounts and marginal costs for Transport Efficiency Deliverable 11: Environmental Marginal Cost Case Studies This document should be referenced as: Peter Bickel, Stephan Schmid (IER), Juha Tervonen, Kari Hämekoski, Tomas Otterström, Peter Anton (EKONO), Riccardo Enei, Gianluca Leone (ISIS), Pauline van Donselaar, H. Carmigchelt (NEI), Environmental Marginal Cost Case Studies, UNITE (UNIfication of accounts and marginal costs for Transport Efficiency) Working Funded by 5th Framework RTD Programme. IER, University of Stuttgart, Stuttgart, January 2003. 24 January 2003 Version No: 2.0 Authors: as above PROJECT INFORMATION Contract no: 1999-AM.11157: UNIfication of accounts and marginal costs for Transport Efficiency Website: www.its.leeds.ac.uk/unite Commissioned by: European Commission – DG TREN; Fifth Framework Programme Lead Partner: Institute for Transport Studies, University of Leeds (UK) Partners: ITS/UNIVLEEDS (UK), DIW (De), NEI (Nl), CES/KUL (Be), TIS.PT (Pt), IWW/UNIKARL (De), VTI (Se), IER/USTUTT (De), CERAS/ENPC (Fr), HERRY (Au), EIET/ULPGC (Es), ISIS (It), STRATEC (Be), SYSTEMA (Gr), JP-TRANSPLAN (Fi), VATT (Fi), ECOPLAN (Ch), INFRAS (Ch), EKONO (Fi), EKI (Se) DOCUMENT CONTROL INFORMATION Status: Draft, 24 January 2003 Distribution: UNITE partners Availability: Public (only once status above is “Accepted”) Filename: Quality assurance: Co-ordinator’s review: Signed: Date: UNITE D11 Environmental Marginal Cost Case Studies 3 Table of contents 1 Summary ................................................................................................................................. 4 2 Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 6 3 Description of Methodology Used........................................................................................... 7 3.1 Air Pollution ....................................................................................................................................... 7 3.1.1 Emissions/burdens .................................................................................................................... 8 3.1.2 Concentrations.......................................................................................................................... 8 3.1.3 Impacts..................................................................................................................................... 9 3.1.4 Monetary Valuation ................................................................................................................ 12 3.1.5 Discussion of Uncertainties..................................................................................................... 13 3.1.6 Common Data used in the case studies .................................................................................... 15 3.2 Global Warming ............................................................................................................................... 16 3.3 Noise ................................................................................................................................................ 17 3.3.1 Noise exposure modelling ....................................................................................................... 17 3.3.2 Noise impact assessment......................................................................................................... 18 3.3.3 Monetary valuation ................................................................................................................. 19 3.4 Other effects ..................................................................................................................................... 20 4 Overview of Marginal Cost Case Studies ............................................................................. 22 4.1 Road and Rail ................................................................................................................................... 22 9A Urban passenger car for Finland ...................................................................................................... 22 9B Heavy goods vehicle for Finland ..................................................................................................... 23 9D Urban road case studies Germany.................................................................................................... 24 9E Inter-urban road case studies Germany............................................................................................. 27 9G Urban road and rail studies: the case of Florence.............................................................................. 30 9H Inter-urban road and rail case studies Italy....................................................................................... 31 4.2 Maritime shipping............................................................................................................................. 33 9C Nordic maritime shipping................................................................................................................ 33 4.3 Inland waterway transport ................................................................................................................. 35 0A Container transport on the Rhine – Marginal cost case study............................................................ 35 5 Generalisation of Results ......................................................................................................36 5.1 Costs due to Air pollution.................................................................................................................. 38 5.1.1 Direct exhaust emissions......................................................................................................... 38 5.1.2 Indirect emissions from electricity production and fuel production........................................... 41 5.1.3 Summary of generalisation aspects..........................................................................................41 5.2 Costs due to Noise............................................................................................................................. 42 5.3 Costs due to Global Warming............................................................................................................ 44 6 Conclusions ........................................................................................................................... 46 References...................................................................................................................................... 49 Glossary ......................................................................................................................................... 52 Abbreviations ................................................................................................................................ 53 UNITE D11 Environmental Marginal Cost Case Studies 4 1Summary Marginal environmental costs were assessed for a number of specific routes in urban areas and important inter-urban relations, covering both passenger and goods transport. All modes were covered, and a broad range of vehicle types was considered for which costs related to the emission of air pollutants, greenhouse gases and noise proved to be relevant and quantifiable cost categories. For quantifying the costs due to airborne pollutants and noise exposure the Impact Pathway Approach was applied. It comprises the steps – emission calculation, – dispersion and chemical conversion modelling of air pollutants / noise propagation, – calculation of physical impacts, and – monetary valuation of these impacts. One of the case studies replaced the dispersion modelling step with the statistical correlation of vehicle mileage with measurement data for carbon monoxide and noise levels. The other case studies were performed with a common set of computer tools for impact assessment. These studies quantified marginal environmental costs as the costs caused by an additional vehicle or train or vessel driving on a specific route. For noise costs, besides route and vehicle characteristics the time of day is relevant, due to the sensitivity of the receptors (which at night is different from during the day) and the high importance of the background noise level, which varies with traffic density. The following table gives an overview of the locations and modes covered as well as the character of the case studies performed. Overview of marginal cost case studies performed No. Country Location Modes considered Character 9A Finland Helsinki