DOCSLIB.ORG

Existing Conditions and Resources Inventory Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Existing Conditions and Resources Inventory Report Existing Conditions and Resources Inventory Report Carmel River State Beach June 2013 – Rev. December 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION.............................................................................................................................. ........... 1-1 2 LAND USE AND POLICY REVIEW............................................................................................................. 2-1 2.1 Regional Land Uses...................................................................................................................... 2-1 2.2 Park Land Use and Zoning ........................................................................................................... 2-5 2.3 Relevant Planning Policies ........................................................................................................... 2-6 2.3.1 1979 General Plan ........................................................................................................... 2-6 2.3.2 1987 General Plan Amendment ...................................................................................... 2-7 2.3.3 1996 General Plan Amendment ...................................................................................... 2-8 2.3.4 Carmel Area Land Use Plan............................................................................................ 2-8 2.4 Easements..................................................................................................................................... 2-9 2.5 Existing Park Facilities................................................................................................................. 2-9 3 SIGNIFICANT RESOURCE VALUES........................................................................................................... 3-1 3.1 Physical Resources ....................................................................................................................... 3-1 3.1.1 Climate ............................................................................................................................ 3-1 3.1.2 Topography ..................................................................................................................... 3-1 3.1.3 Geology and Seismicity................................................................................................... 3-1 3.1.4 Paleontology.................................................................................................................... 3-2 3.1.5 Soils................................................................................................................................. 3-2 3.1.6 Hydrology, Water Quality, and Floodplains ................................................................... 3-6 3.1.7 Shoreline Conditions ....................................................................................................... 3-9 3.1.8 Climate Change and Sea Level Rise ............................................................................. 3-11 3.2 Natural Resources....................................................................................................................... 3-14 3.2.1 Plants ............................................................................................................................. 3-14 3.2.2 Aquatic Life................................................................................................................... 3-44 3.2.3 Ecology.......................................................................................................................... 3-45 3.2.4 Prior General Plan Proposals ......................................................................................... 3-46 3.3 Cultural Resources ..................................................................................................................... 3-47 3.3.1 Prehistoric Background ................................................................................................. 3-47 3.3.2 Ethnographic Background............................................................................................. 3-51 3.3.3 Archaeological Investigations ....................................................................................... 3-53 3.3.4 Historic Background...................................................................................................... 3-54 3.3.5 Architectural Resources ................................................................................................ 3-58 3.3.6 Collections..................................................................................................................... 3-59 3.3.7 Prior General Plan Proposals ......................................................................................... 3-59 3.4 Aesthetic Resources ................................................................................................................... 3-60 3.4.1 Visual Resources and Viewsheds .................................................................................. 3-60 3.4.2 Designated Scenic Areas and Routes ............................................................................ 3-61 4 RECREATION RESOURCES ....................................................................................................................... 4-1 4.1 Regional Recreation ..................................................................................................................... 4-1 4.1.1 Federal Parks ................................................................................................................... 4-1 Existing Conditions AECOM Carmel River State Beach i Table of Contents 4.1.2 California State Parks ...................................................................................................... 4-1 4.1.3 Regional Parks ................................................................................................................. 4-1 4.2 Parkwide Recreation ..................................................................................................................... 4-2 4.2.1 Recreational Activities .................................................................................................... 4-2 4.2.2 Recreation Facilities and Trails ....................................................................................... 4-4 4.2.3 Accessibility .................................................................................................................... 4-5 4.3 Patterns and Levels of Recreational Use ...................................................................................... 4-7 4.3.1 Regional Patterns and Use ............................................................................................... 4-7 4.3.2 Patterns and Use at Carmel River SB .............................................................................. 4-8 5 I NTERPRETATION AND EDUCATION ........................................................................................................ 5-1 5.1 Facilities ....................................................................................................................................... 5-1 5.2 Themes ......................................................................................................................................... 5-2 5.3 Regional Interpretation ................................................................................................................. 5-2 5.4 Prior General Plan Proposals ........................................................................................................ 5-3 6 A CCESS, CIRCULATION, AND TRANSPORTATION ................................................................................... 6-1 6.1 Access ........................................................................................................................................... 6-1 6.2 Roads/Circulation ......................................................................................................................... 6-1 6.2.1 Planned Roadway Improvements .................................................................................... 6-1 6.3 Parking ......................................................................................................................................... 6-1 6.4 Traffic Volumes ........................................................................................................................... 6-2 6.5 Alternative Modes of Transportation ........................................................................................... 6-3 6.6 Prior General Plan Proposals ........................................................................................................ 6-7 7 P ARK OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE ................................................................................................ 7-1 7.1 Existing Facilities ......................................................................................................................... 7-1 7.2 Staff and Services ......................................................................................................................... 7-1 7.3 Concessions .................................................................................................................................. 7-1 7.4 Contracts and Agreements ............................................................................................................ 7-1 7.5 Utilities and Services ...................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • National Forest Genetic Electrophoresis Lab Annual Report 2003 – 2004 (FY04)
    USDA FOREST SERVICE NATIONAL FOREST GENETICS LABORATORY (NFGEL) Annual Report 2003 – 2004 (FY04) 2480 Carson Road, Placerville, CA 95667 530-622-1609 (voice), 530-622-2633 (fax), [email protected] Report prepared December 2004 INTRODUCTION This report covers laboratory activities and accomplishments during Fiscal Year 2004. October 1, 2003 through September 30, 2004 Background NFGEL was established in 1988 as part of the National Forest System of the USDA-Forest Service. The focus of the lab is to address genetic conservation and management of all plant species using a variety of laboratory techniques including DNA analyses. NFGEL services are provided to managers within the Forest Service, other government agencies, and non- government organizations for assessing and monitoring genetic diversity. Purpose of Laboratory The purpose of the Laboratory is to analyze molecular genetic markers (protein and DNA) in plant material submitted by Forest Service employees and those from other cooperating entities. NFGEL provides baseline genetic information, determines the effect of management on the genetic resource, supports genetic improvement program, and contributes information in the support of conservation and restoration programs, especially those involving native and TES (threatened, endangered, and sensitive) species. Alignment to National Strategic Plan for FY04-08 NFGEL’s work aligns to the following National Strategic Plan measures: 1. Goal 1 (Reduce risks from catastrophic wildland fire) 2. Goal 2 (Reduce the impacts from invasive species). 3. Goal 4 (Help meet energy resource needs) 4. Goal 5 (Improve watershed condition) 5. Goal 6 (Mission related work in addition to that which supports the agency goals) NFGEL Projects NFGEL projects were processed to meet a variety of management objectives.
    [Show full text]
  • Doggin' America's Beaches
    Doggin’ America’s Beaches A Traveler’s Guide To Dog-Friendly Beaches - (and those that aren’t) Doug Gelbert illustrations by Andrew Chesworth Cruden Bay Books There is always something for an active dog to look forward to at the beach... DOGGIN’ AMERICA’S BEACHES Copyright 2007 by Cruden Bay Books All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording or by any information storage and retrieval system without permission in writing from the Publisher. Cruden Bay Books PO Box 467 Montchanin, DE 19710 www.hikewithyourdog.com International Standard Book Number 978-0-9797074-4-5 “Dogs are our link to paradise...to sit with a dog on a hillside on a glorious afternoon is to be back in Eden, where doing nothing was not boring - it was peace.” - Milan Kundera Ahead On The Trail Your Dog On The Atlantic Ocean Beaches 7 Your Dog On The Gulf Of Mexico Beaches 6 Your Dog On The Pacific Ocean Beaches 7 Your Dog On The Great Lakes Beaches 0 Also... Tips For Taking Your Dog To The Beach 6 Doggin’ The Chesapeake Bay 4 Introduction It is hard to imagine any place a dog is happier than at a beach. Whether running around on the sand, jumping in the water or just lying in the sun, every dog deserves a day at the beach. But all too often dog owners stopping at a sandy stretch of beach are met with signs designed to make hearts - human and canine alike - droop: NO DOGS ON BEACH.
    [Show full text]
  • Coastal Resource Management Element
    Coastal Resource Management Element General Plan/Coastal Land Use Plan Coastal Resource Management Element C OASTAL R ESOURCE M ANAGEMENT E LEMENT Introduction This element of the General Plan/Coastal Land Use Plan includes policies for protection of the City’s coastal environmental resources including the character of its forest, beach and bluffs, water quality and Environmentally Sensitive Habitat Areas (ESHAs). As noted in the previous element (Access and Recreation), there is little private land located between the first public road and the shoreline. The City owns nearly the entire beach. This eliminates many of the potential conflicts that other communities face between development and resource preservation objectives along the immediate coastline. However, the City’s biological resources are found in a variety of other locations, and require protection under the Coastal Act. (LUP) Coastal Resource Management Background Environmental Setting The City of Carmel-by-the-Sea is located in a region of California’s central coast that is known for its diversity of plants and plant communities. The region surrounding the city supports several different climatic, topographic, and soil conditions, resulting in a wide variety of habitats. This diversity of conditions supports many native plants and wildlife species. As an example of this diversity, 146 plant species reach their most southern and 156 plant species reach their most northern distributional limits in Monterey County, and at least 34 plant species are found only in Monterey County. (LUP) Residential development occurs on almost all land in the city, except for seven parks, several mini-parks, a compact centralized commercial area and some privately owned parcels in Pescadero Canyon.
    [Show full text]
  • 1968 General Plan
    I I I I I I MONTEREY COUNTY GENERAL PLAN I MONTEREY COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA I I I I ADOPTED BY THE MONTEREY COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION JULY 10, 1968 I ADOPTED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF MONTEREY COUNTY OCTOBER 22, 1968 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 0 N I I I MONTEREY COUNTY I I I I I I PREFACE I The Monterey County General Plan is an attempt to establish a county philosophy based on the values and desires of the people. This in turn becomes a valid basis for decisions by public bodies as well as private enterprise. Such a pro­ cedure is vitally needed in our rapidly changing environment. The General Plan I is a study of the ever changing pattern of Monterey County --a mirror in which to review the past, to comprehend the present, and to contemplate the future, This plan reflects years of research and study as well as many other reports such as I the continuing Facts and Figures, Recreation in Monterey County, Beach Acqui­ sition, and other plans which are shown as separate documents h~cause of the volume of material. I The size of Monterey County, its variety of climate, vegetation, and land forms make it imperative that only large land uses or broad proposals be used to portray geographically the objectives desired for the future development of the County. I Accordingly, in addition to the maps, greater emphasis in the General Plan is placed on the text which conveys in words the objectives as well as the princi­ ples and standards recommended to make them effective.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Pacific Coast Winter Window Survey Results
    2020 Winter Window Survey for Snowy Plovers on U.S. Pacific Coast with 2013-2020 Results for Comparison. Note: blanks indicate no survey was conducted. REGION SITE OWNER 2017 2018 2019 2020 2020 Date Primary Observer(s) Gray's Harbor Copalis Spit State Parks 0 0 0 0 28-Jan C. Sundstrum Conner Creek State Parks 0 0 0 0 28-Jan C. Sundstrum, W. Michaelis Damon Point WDNR 0 0 0 0 30-Jan C. Sundstrum Oyhut Spit WDNR 0 0 0 0 30-Jan C. Sundstrum Ocean Shores to Ocean City 4 10 0 9 28-Jan C. Sundstrum, W. Michaelis County Total 4 10 0 9 Pacific Midway Beach Private, State Parks 22 28 58 66 27-Jan C. Sundstrum, W. Michaelis Graveyard Spit Shoalwater Indian Tribe 0 0 0 0 30-Jan C. Sundstrum, R. Ashley Leadbetter Point NWR USFWS, State Parks 34 3 15 0 11-Feb W. Ritchie South Long Beach Private 6 0 7 0 10-Feb W. Ritchie Benson Beach State Parks 0 0 0 0 20-Jan W. Ritchie County Total 62 31 80 66 Washington Total 66 41 80 75 Clatsop Fort Stevens State Park (Clatsop Spit) ACOE, OPRD 10 19 21 20-Jan T. Pyle, D. Osis DeLaura Beach OPRD No survey Camp Rilea DOD 0 0 0 No survey Sunset Beach OPRD 0 No survey Del Rio Beach OPRD 0 No survey Necanicum Spit OPRD 0 0 0 20-Jan J. Everett, S. Everett Gearhart Beach OPRD 0 No survey Columbia R-Necanicum R. OPRD No survey County Total 0 10 19 21 Tillamook Nehalem Spit OPRD 0 17 26 19-Jan D.
    [Show full text]
  • Big Sur for Other Uses, See Big Sur (Disambiguation)
    www.caseylucius.com [email protected] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Main_Page Big Sur For other uses, see Big Sur (disambiguation). Big Sur is a lightly populated region of the Central Coast of California where the Santa Lucia Mountains rise abruptly from the Pacific Ocean. Although it has no specific boundaries, many definitions of the area include the 90 miles (140 km) of coastline from the Carmel River in Monterey County south to the San Carpoforo Creek in San Luis Obispo County,[1][2] and extend about 20 miles (30 km) inland to the eastern foothills of the Santa Lucias. Other sources limit the eastern border to the coastal flanks of these mountains, only 3 to 12 miles (5 to 19 km) inland. Another practical definition of the region is the segment of California State Route 1 from Carmel south to San Simeon. The northern end of Big Sur is about 120 miles (190 km) south of San Francisco, and the southern end is approximately 245 miles (394 km) northwest of Los Angeles. The name "Big Sur" is derived from the original Spanish-language "el sur grande", meaning "the big south", or from "el país grande del sur", "the big country of the south". This name refers to its location south of the city of Monterey.[3] The terrain offers stunning views, making Big Sur a popular tourist destination. Big Sur's Cone Peak is the highest coastal mountain in the contiguous 48 states, ascending nearly a mile (5,155 feet/1571 m) above sea level, only 3 miles (5 km) from the ocean.[4] The name Big Sur can also specifically refer to any of the small settlements in the region, including Posts, Lucia and Gorda; mail sent to most areas within the region must be addressed "Big Sur".[5] It also holds thousands of marathons each year.
    [Show full text]
  • CIP Report 2001-02
    Fort Ord Reuse Authority Capital Improvement Program (CIP) FY 2001/2002 through 2020/2021 (Final Version – FORA Board Approval, 06/08/01) 1 Table of Contents Page No. I. Executive Summary 3, 4, 5 II. Obligatory Program of Projects – Description of CIP Elements a. Transportation/Transit Projects 6, 7, 8, 9 b. Potable Water Augmentation 10 c. Storm Drainage System Projects 11 d. Habitat Management Requirements 12 e. Public Facility (Fire Station) Requirements 13 f. Building Removal Program 14, 15, 16 g. Water and Wastewater Collection Systems 17 III. FY 2001/2002 through 2020/2021 CIP a. Transportation/Transit Element 18-22 b. Summary of Obligatory CIP Elements 23, 24 c. Summary Spreadsheet (Overall CIP) 25 Appendices A. Protocol for Review/Reprogramming of CIP 26 B. Summary of funded projects through 2000/2001 27-38 C. Protocol for “Candidate Projects” 39-42 as replacements to listed mitigative transportation projects Attachment A D. CIP Revenue Discussion 43-44 2 Executive Summary 1) Overview This Fort Ord Reuse Authority (FORA) Capital Improvement Program (CIP) is responsive to the capital improvement obligations defined under the Fort Ord Base Reuse Plan (BRP) as adopted by the FORA Board in June 1997. The BRP carries a series of mitigative project obligations defined in Appendix B of that plan as the Public Facilities Implementation Plan (PFIP). The PFIP, which serves as the baseline CIP for the reuse plan, is to be re-visited annually by the FORA Board to assure that required projects are implemented in a timely way to meet development needs. The PFIP was developed as a four-phase program spanning a twenty-year development horizon (1996-2015) and was based upon the best at-the-time forecasts of development patterns anticipated in concert with market absorption schedules for the area.
    [Show full text]
  • Discover California State Parks in the Monterey Area
    Crashing waves, redwoods and historic sites Discover California State Parks in the Monterey Area Some of the most beautiful sights in California can be found in Monterey area California State Parks. Rocky cliffs, crashing waves, redwood trees, and historic sites are within an easy drive of each other. "When you look at the diversity of state parks within the Monterey District area, you begin to realize that there is something for everyone - recreational activities, scenic beauty, natural and cultural history sites, and educational programs,” said Dave Schaechtele, State Parks Monterey District Public Information Officer. “There are great places to have fun with families and friends, and peaceful and inspirational settings that are sure to bring out the poet, writer, photographer, or artist in you. Some people return to their favorite state parks, year-after-year, while others venture out and discover some new and wonderful places that are then added to their 'favorites' list." State Parks in the area include: Limekiln State Park, 54 miles south of Carmel off Highway One and two miles south of the town of Lucia, features vistas of the Big Sur coast, redwoods, and the remains of historic limekilns. The Rockland Lime and Lumber Company built these rock and steel furnaces in 1887 to cook the limestone mined from the canyon walls. The 711-acre park allows visitors an opportunity to enjoy the atmosphere of Big Sur’s southern coast. The park has the only safe access to the shoreline along this section of cast. For reservations at the park’s 36 campsites, call ReserveAmerica at (800) 444- PARK (7275).
    [Show full text]
  • ·|}Þ183 40 R Le D 17-Mi
    40 0 2,500 Feet Del Monte Forest Non - Coastal - Detail ·|}þ183 40 R LE D 17-MI LAPIS RD C O 40 N G R E SH S PACIFIC GROVE I B S AN A P S Y R D R NASHUA RD D 40 DEL MONTE BLVD 17-MILE DR ·|}þ68 DAVID AVE 40 40 SLOAT RD OCEAN RD MONTEREY 40 ¤£101 MC FADDEN RD GMP-1.9 ST Legend for Del Monte Forest Coastal Zone Bondary Parcel Æ` COOPER RD City Limits MARINA ARMSTRONG RD y Residential BLANCO RD RESIDENTIAL 2 Units/Acre RESERVATION RD Marina Municipal Forest Lake a Airport STEVENSON DR RESIDENTIAL 2.4 Units/Acre 1 Greater Salinas BIRD ROCK RD ·|}þ RESIDENTIAL 4 Units/Acre B Resource Conservation S a y l Resource Conservation 10 Ac Min in a s R SALINAS i Land use within the Coastal Zone is Open Space Forest e v e r addressed in the Del Monte Forest LUP. Open Space Recreation r IMJIN RD Urban Reserve e HITCHCOCK RD t n o Fort Ord Dunes State Park INTERGARRISON RD M 1ST ST HITCHCOCK RD DAVIS RD n GIGLING RD a 0 2,000 Feet Pasadera - Detail FOSTER RD e See the Fort Ord Master Plan for this area, Fig LU6a. c LIGHTHOUSE AVE SOUTH BOUNDARY RD 2.5 2.76 YORK RD EUCALYPTUS RD ERA DR SAD O GENERAL JIM MOORE BLV A SPRECKELS BLVD ESTRELLA AVE P 2.76 68 c SAND CITY SEASIDE YORK RD 2.76 ·|}þ PACIFIC GROVE Laguna Seca Recreation Area R IVER RD i .76 .76 10 f DAVID AVE i 5.1 68 5.1 10 ·|}þ 10 c BIT RD 5.1 Del Monte Forest See Detail 5.1 a DEL MONTE AVE P ·|}þ218 FREMONT ST FREMONT ST See Fort Ord Master Plan for this area, Fig LU6a.
    [Show full text]
  • Proposition 12 Allocation Balance Report
    Proposition 12 Allocation Balance Report as of July 29, 2019 Public Resources Code 5096.310 Net Available for Enacted Bond Section Department/Program Appropriation* Appropriations** Proposed Balance §5096.310(a) Department of Parks and Recreation : Capital Outlay Projects 493,065,557 495,999,175 0 -2,933,618 (b) §5096.310(b) Department of Parks and Recreation : Stewardship Projects 17,661,973 17,661,973 0 0 §5096.310(c) Department of Parks and Recreation : Volunteers Projects 3,924,661 3,924,661 0 0 §5096.310(d) Department of Parks and Recreation : Locally-operated State Park Unit Grants 19,587,303 19,587,303 0 0 §5096.310(e) Department of Parks and Recreation : Office of Historic Preservation Grants 9,793,651 9,793,651 0 0 §5096.310(f) Department of Parks and Recreation : Per Capita Grants 379,854,866 379,828,335 0 26,531 §5096.310(g) Department of Parks and Recreation : Roberti-Z’Berg-Harris Grants 195,800,694 195,791,658 0 9,036 §5096.310(h) Department of Parks and Recreation : Riparian/Riverine Grants 9,789,935 9,789,483 0 452 §5096.310(i) Department of Parks and Recreation : Trail Grants 9,789,936 9,789,485 0 451 §5096.310(j) Department of Parks and Recreation : Murray-Hayden Grants 97,900,346 97,442,392 0 457,954 §5096.310(k) California Conservation Corps : State Projects 2,466,163 2,421,482 0 44,681 §5096.310(l) Department of Parks and Recreation : Zoos, Centers, Soccer Grants 84,682,916 84,679,008 0 3,908 §5096.310(m) Wildlife Conservation Board 261,632,536 262,612,879 0 -980,343 (a) §5096.310(n) California Tahoe Conservancy 49,264,259
    [Show full text]
  • Garrapata Brochure Layout
    © 2003 California State Parks Paper State Recycled California on 2003 © Printed Cover Photo by Tom Moss Tom by Photo Cover 831-649-2866 Monterey, CA 93940 CA Monterey, 2211 Garden Road Garden 2211 Monterey Sector Monterey Garrapata State Park State Garrapata www.parks.ca.gov 94296-0001 711, TTY relay service relay TTY 711, Sacramento, CA Sacramento, 916-653-6995, outside the U.S. the outside 916-653-6995, O. Box 942896 Box O. P. 800-777-0369 STATE PARKS STATE ion call: ion informat For CALIFORNIA Office at the following address. following the at Office alternate format, write to the Communications the to write format, alternate number below. To receive this publication in an in publication this receive To below. number assistance should contact the park at the phone the at park the contact should assistance arrival, visitors with disabilities who need who disabilities with visitors arrival, against individuals with disabilities. Prior to Prior disabilities. with individuals against California State Parks does not discriminate not does Parks State California canyons. redwood d deep d an ins mounta steep Acting Director, California State Parks State California Director, Acting RUTH COLEMAN RUTH beautiful inland area of area inland beautiful Secretary for Resources for Secretary ine and a and ine orel sh rocky MARY D. NICHOLS D. MARY Governor ectacular sp a compass en GRAY DAVIS GRAY s 3,000 acres 3,000 s a’ at ap rr Ga r high-quality outdoor recreation. outdoor high-quality r fo cultural resources, and creating opportunities creating and
    [Show full text]
  • Carmel Bay State Marine Conservation Area Central California - Established September 2007
    Carmel Bay State Marine Conservation Area Central California - Established September 2007 What is a California marine protected area (or “MPA”)? Quick Facts: Carmel Bay State An MPA is a type of managed area whose main purpose is to protect or Marine Conservation Area conserve marine life and habitats in ocean or estuarine waters. California’s • MPA size: 2.20 square miles MPA Network consists of 124 areas with varying levels of protection and 14 special closures, all designed to help safeguard the state’s marine • Shoreline span: 2.7 miles ecosystems. Most marine conservation areas such as Carmel Bay State • Depth range: 0 to 471 feet Marine Conservation Area provide some opportunity for commercial • Habitat composition: and/or recreational take (species and gear exceptions vary by location Sand/mud: 1.31 square miles - see reverse). Rock: 0.82 square miles One goal for California’s MPAs was to strategically place them near each Other: 0.07 square miles other to form an interconnected network that would help to preserve the flow of life between marine ecosystems. Within that network each MPA has unique goals and regulations, and non-consumptive activities, permitted scientific research, monitoring, and educational pursuits may be allowed. Why was this location chosen for a state marine conservation area? One of the goals for Carmel Bay State Marine Conservation Area is to protect the rocky reefs, kelp forests, surfgrass beds, and sandy sea floor habitat found there, and the head of Carmel Submarine Canyon. The deepwater canyon funnels cold, nutrient-rich water into the conservation area, helping to support an array of life.
    [Show full text]