Table 4.19 the Attorneys General, 2006

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Table 4.19 the Attorneys General, 2006 attORNEYS GENERAL Table 4.19 THE attORNEYS GENERAL, 2006 Length of Number of Maximum State or other Method of regular term Date of previous consecutive jurisdiction Name and party selection in years first service Present term ends terms terms allowed Alabama .................... Troy King (R) E 4 3/04 (i) 1/07 0 2 Alaska ........................ David W. Marquez (R) A . 3/05 . 0 . Arizona ...................... Terry Goddard (D) E 4 1/03 1/07 0 2 (a) Arkansas .................... Mike Beebe (D) E 4 1/03 1/07 0 2 California .................. Bill Lockyer (D) E 4 1/99 1/07 1 2 Colorado .................... John W. Suthers (R) E 4 1/05 (m) 1/07 0 2 Connecticut ............... Richard Blumenthal (D) E 4 1/91 1/07 3 ★ Delaware .................... Carl Danberg (D) (o) E 4 12/05 (o) 1/07 0 ★ Florida ....................... Charlie Crist (R) E 4 1/03 1/07 0 2 Georgia ...................... Thurbert E. Baker (D) E 4 6/97 (j) 1/07 1 (j) ★ Hawaii ........................ Mark J. Bennett (R) A 4 (k) 12/02 12/06 0 . Idaho .......................... Lawrence Wasden (R) E 4 1/03 1/07 0 ★ Illinois ........................ Lisa Madigan (D) E 4 1/03 1/07 0 ★ Indiana ....................... Steve Carter (R) E 4 1/01 1/09 1 . Iowa ........................... Tom Miller (D) E 4 1/79 1/07 4 ★ Kansas ....................... Phill Kline (R) E 4 1/03 1/07 0 ★ Kentucky ................... Greg Stumbo (D) E 4 1/04 12/07 0 2 Louisiana ................... Charles C. Foti Jr. (D) E 4 1/04 1/08 0 ★ Maine ......................... G. Steven Rowe (D) (b) 2 1/01 1/07 1 4 Maryland ................... J. Joseph Curran Jr. (D) E 4 1/87 1/07 4 ★ Massachusetts............ Tom Reilly (D) E 4 1/99 1/07 1 2 Michigan .................... Mike Cox (R) E 4 1/03 1/07 0 2 Minnesota .................. Mike Hatch (D) E 4 1/99 1/07 1 ★ Mississippi ................. Jim Hood (D) E 4 1/04 1/08 0 ★ Missouri ..................... Jeremiah W. Nixon (D) E 4 1/93 1/09 3 ★ Montana .................... Mike McGrath (D) E 4 1/01 1/09 1 2 (c) Nebraska .................... Jon Bruning (R) E 4 1/03 1/07 0 ★ Nevada ....................... George J. Chanos (R) E (n) 4 11/05 (n) 1/07 0 2 New Hampshire ......... Kelly Ayotte (R) A . 7/04 11/06 0 . New Jersey ................. Zulima Farber (D) A . 1/06 . 0 . New Mexico ............... Patricia A. Madrid (D) E 4 1/99 1/07 1 2 (a) New York ................... Eliot Spitzer (D) E 4 1/99 1/07 1 ★ North Carolina .......... Roy Cooper (D) E 4 1/01 1/09 1 ★ North Dakota............. Wayne Stenehjem (R) E 4 (d) 12/00 12/06 1 ★(d) Ohio ........................... Jim Petro (R) E 4 1/03 1/07 0 2 Oklahoma .................. W.A. Drew Edmondson (D) E 4 1/95 1/07 2 ★ Oregon ....................... Hardy Myers (D) E 4 1/97 1/09 2 ★ Pennsylvania ............. Tom Corbett (R) E 4 1/05 1/09 0 2 (a) Rhode Island ............. Patrick Lynch (D) E 4 1/03 1/07 0 2 (a) South Carolina .......... Henry McMaster (R) E 4 1/03 1/07 0 ★ South Dakota ............. Larry Long (R) E 4 1/03 1/07 0 2 (a) Tennessee ................... Paul G. Summers (D) (f) 8 1/99 1/07 0 . Texas .......................... Greg Abbott (R) E 4 1/03 1/07 0 ★ Utah ........................... Mark Shurtleff (R) E 4 1/01 1/09 1 ★ Vermont ..................... William H. Sorrell (D) E 2 5/97 (e) 1/07 3 (e) ★ Virginia ...................... Robert F. McDonnell (R) E 4 1/06 1/10 0 (g) Washington ................ Rob McKenna (R) E 4 1/05 1/09 0 ★ West Virginia ............. Darrell Vivian McGraw Jr. (D) E 4 1/93 1/09 3 ★ Wisconsin................... Peg Lautenschlager (D) E 4 1/03 1/07 0 ★ Wyoming .................... Pat Crank (D) A (h) . 1/03 1/07 0 . Dist. of Columbia ...... Robert Spanoletti (D) A . 6/03 . 0 . American Samoa ....... Malaetasi M. Togafau A 4 2/05 . 0 . Guam ......................... Douglas Moylan E 4 1/03 1/07 0 . No. Mariana Islands... Matt Gregory A 4 N.A. N.A. N.A. Puerto Rico ................ Roberto J. Sanchez-Ramos A 4 N.A. 0 . U.S. Virgin Islands .... Kerry Drue A 4 9/05 . 0 . See footnotes at end of table. 202 The Book of the States 2006 Chapter-4.indb 202 5/3/06 4:07:26 PM attORNEYS GENERAL THE attORNEYS GENERAL, 2006—Continued Source: The Council of State Governments’ survey of attorneys general, (e) Appointed to fill unexpired term in May 1997. He was elected in 1998 January 2006. to his first full term. Key: (f) Appointed by judges of state Supreme Court. ★ — No provision specifying number of terms allowed. (g) Provision specifying individual may hold office for an unlimited . — No formal provision, position is appointed or elected by governmental number of terms. entity (not chosen by the electorate). (h) Must be confirmed by the Senate. A — Appointed by the governor (i) Appointed to fill unexpired term in March 2004. E — Elected by the voters (j) Appointed to fill unexpired term in June 1997. He was elected in 1998 L — Elected by the legislature to his first full term. (a) After two consecutive terms, must wait four years and/or one full term (k) Term runs concurrently with the Governor. before being eligible again. (l) Appointed to fill unexpired term in February 2004. (b) Chosen biennially by joint ballot of state senators and representatives. (m) Appointed to fill unexpired term in January 2005. (c) Eligible for eight out of 16 years. (n) George Chanos was appointed to fill the unexpired term of Brian Sandoval (d) The term of the office of the elected official is four years, except that in after he resigned to accept a federal district judgeship on November 2, 2005. 2004 the attorney general was elected for a term of two years. (o) Appointed to fill the unexpired term of M. Jane Brady on December 7, 2005 when she resigned to become a Superior Court judge. The Council of State Governments 203 Chapter-4.indb 203 5/3/06 4:07:27 PM.
Recommended publications
  • State Attorneys General a Communication from the Chief
    State Attorneys General A Communication from the Chief Legal Officers of the Following States and Territories: Alaska * American Samoa * California * Colorado * Connecticut * Delaware District of Columbia * Hawaii * Idaho * Illinois * Iowa * Kentucky * Maine Maryland * Massachusetts * Minnesota * Mississippi * Montana * Nebraska * Nevada New Hampshire * New Mexico * New York * North Carolina * Northern Mariana Islands Oregon * Pennsylvania * Rhode Island * South Dakota * Vermont * Virginia * Washington May 22, 2017 The Honorable Rodney P. Frelinghuysen The Honorable Nita Lowey Chairman Ranking Member U.S. House Committee on Appropriations U.S. House Committee on Appropriations 2306 Rayburn House Office Building 2365 Rayburn House Office Building Washington, D.C. 20515 Washington, DC 20515 The Honorable John Culberson The Honorable José Serrano Chairman Ranking Member U.S. House Committee on Appropriations U.S. House Committee on Appropriations Subcommittee on Commerce, Justice, Science, Subcommittee on Commerce, Justice, Science, & Related Agencies & Related Agencies 2161 Rayburn House Office Building 2354 Rayburn House Office Building Washington, D.C. 20515 Washington, DC 20515 Re: Support for the Legal Services Corporation Dear Chairman Frelinghuysen, Ranking Member Lowey, Chairman Culberson and Ranking Member Serrano, As state attorneys general, we write in united, bipartisan opposition to the Trump Administration’s proposal to eliminate all federal funding for the Legal Services Corporation (LSC) and legal services for rural and low-income Americans. For more than 40 years, under Republican and Democratic administrations, the Legal Services Corporation has helped our residents to access justice. LSC funding helps veterans and military families secure important benefits, it supports survivors of domestic violence seeking safety, and it assists families facing foreclosure and victims of natural disasters.
    [Show full text]
  • Massachusetts V. EPA, 549 US 497 - Supreme Court 2007 - Google Scholar
    6/12/2019 Massachusetts v. EPA, 549 US 497 - Supreme Court 2007 - Google Scholar 127 S.Ct. 1438 (2007) 549 U.S. 497 MASSACHUSETTS et al., Petitioners, v. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY et al. No. 05­1120. Supreme Court of United States. Argued November 29, 2006. Decided April 2, 2007. James R. Milkey, Boston, MA, for petitioners. Gregory G. Garre, Washington, D.C., for respondents. Thomas F. Reilly, Attorney General of Massachusetts, Lisa Heinzerling, Special Assistant Attorney General, Washington, D.C., James R. Milkey, Counsel of Record, William L. Pardee, Carol Iancu, Assistant Attorneys General, Boston, MA, Bill Lockyer, Attorney General of California, Marc N. Melnick, Nicholas Stern, Deputy Attorneys General, Oakland, CA, Richard Blumenthal, Attorney General of Connecticut, Kimberly Massicotte, Matthew Levin, Assistant Attorneys General, Hartford, CT, Lisa Madigan, Attorney General of Illinois, Matthew J. Dunn, Gerald T. Karr, Assistant Attorneys General, Chicago, IL, G. Steven Rowe, Attorney General of Maine, Gerald D. Reid, Assistant Attorney General, Augusta, ME, Stuart Rabner, Attorney General of New Jersey, Stefanie A. Brand, Kevin P. Auerbacher, Lisa Morelli, Deputy Attorneys General, Trenton, NJ, Patricia A. Madrid, Attorney General of New Mexico, Stuart M. Bluestone, Deputy Attorney General, Stephen R. Ferris, Judith Ann Moore, Assistant Attorneys General, Sante Fe, NM, Eliot Spitzer, Attorney General of New York, Caitlin J. Halligan, Solicitor General, J. Jared Snyder, Assistant Attorneys General, New York, NY, Hardy Myers Attorney General of Oregon, Philip Schradle, Special Counsel to the Attorney General, Richard Whitman, Assistant Attorney General, Oregon Dept. of Justice, Salem, OR, Patrick C. Lynch, Attorney General of Rhode 1445 Island, Tricia K.
    [Show full text]
  • January 12, 2021 the Honorable Jeffrey A. Rosen Acting Attorney
    January 12, 2021 The Honorable Jeffrey A. Rosen Acting Attorney General U.S. Department of Justice 950 Pennsylvania Ave., NW Washington, DC 20530 Dear Acting Attorney General Rosen: We, the undersigned state attorneys general, are committed to the protection of public safety, the rule of law, and the U.S. Constitution. We are appalled that on January 6, 2021, rioters invaded the U.S. Capitol, defaced the building, and engaged in a range of criminal conduct—including unlawful entry, theft, destruction of U.S. government property, and assault. Worst of all, the riot resulted in the deaths of individuals, including a U.S. Capitol Police officer, and others were physically injured. Beyond these harms, the rioters’ actions temporarily paused government business of the most sacred sort in our system—certifying the result of a presidential election. We all just witnessed a very dark day in America. The events of January 6 represent a direct, physical challenge to the rule of law and our democratic republic itself. Together, we will continue to do our part to repair the damage done to institutions and build a more perfect union. As Americans, and those charged with enforcing the law, we must come together to condemn lawless violence, making clear that such actions will not be allowed to go unchecked. Thank you for your consideration of and work on this crucial priority. Sincerely Phil Weiser Karl A. Racine Colorado Attorney General District of Columbia Attorney General Lawrence Wasden Douglas Peterson Idaho Attorney General Nebraska Attorney General Steve Marshall Clyde “Ed” Sniffen, Jr. Alabama Attorney General Acting Alaska Attorney General Mark Brnovich Leslie Rutledge Arizona Attorney General Arkansas Attorney General Xavier Becerra William Tong California Attorney General Connecticut Attorney General Kathleen Jennings Ashley Moody Delaware Attorney General Florida Attorney General Christopher M.
    [Show full text]
  • June 18, 2021 Honorable Merrick B. Garland Attorney General of The
    DANA NESSEL MICHIGAN ATTORNEY GENERAL June 18, 2021 Honorable Merrick B. Garland Attorney General of the United States U.S. Department of Justice 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20530-0001 Lisa O. Monaco Deputy Attorney General U.S. Department of Justice 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20530-0001 Re: Department of Justice’s interpretation of Wire Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1084 Dear Attorney General Garland and Deputy Attorney General Monaco: We, the undersigned State Attorneys General, are seeking clarity and finality from the Department of Justice regarding its interpretation of the Wire Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1084. As you may be aware, 25 State Attorneys General wrote to your predecessors on March 21, 2019 to express our strong objection to the Office of Legal Counsel’s (OLC’s) Opinion “Reconsidering Whether the Wire Act Applies to Non- Sports Gambling,” which reversed the Department’s seven-year-old position that the Wire Act applied only to sports betting. Many States relied on that former position to allow online gaming to proceed. Since that letter, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit upheld a challenge to the new OLC Opinion, holding that the Wire Act applies only to sports betting. After the First Circuit decision, it is vital that States get clarity on the Department’s position going forward. States and industry participants need to understand what their rights are under the law without having to file suit in every federal circuit, and finality is needed so the industry may confidently invest in new products and features without fear of criminal prosecution.
    [Show full text]
  • Letters to the U.S. House and U.S. Senate
    April 29, 2021 Senator Patrick Leahy Senator Richard Shelby Chair Ranking Member U.S. Senate Committee U.S. Senate Committee on Appropriations on Appropriations 437 Russell Building 304 Russell Building Washington, DC 20510 Washington, DC 20510 Senator Jeanne Shaheen Senator Jerry Moran Chair Ranking Member U.S. Senate Committee on U.S. Senate Committee on Appropriations Appropriations Subcommittee on Subcommittee on Commerce, Justice, Science, Commerce, Justice, Science, & Related Agencies & Related Agencies 506 Hart Building 521 Dirksen Building Washington, DC 20510 Washington, DC 20510 Re: State Attorneys General Support the Legal Services Corporation Dear Chair DeLauro, Ranking Member Granger, Chair Cartwright, and Ranking Member Aderholt, As state attorneys general, we respectfully request that you consider robust funding for the Legal Services Corporation (LSC) in the Fiscal Year 2022 Commerce, Justice, Science, and Related Agencies Appropriations bill. Since 1974, LSC funding has provided vital and diverse legal assistance to low-income Americans including victims of natural disasters, survivors of domestic violence, families facing foreclosure, and veterans accessing earned benefits. Today, LSC also provides essential support for struggling families affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. As the single largest funder of civil legal aid in the United States, LSC-funded programs touch every corner of our country with more than 800 offices and a presence in every congressional district. LSC funding has also fostered public-private partnerships between legal aid organizations and private firms and attorneys across the country which donate their time and skills to assist residents in need. Nationwide, 132 independent nonprofit legal aid programs rely on this federal funding to provide services to nearly two million of our constituents on an annual basis.
    [Show full text]
  • Fax (304) 558-0140
    fs i.`.. G, * * ...... ,,,,,,,,,,, State of West Virginia Office of the Attorney General Patrick Morrisey (304) 558-2021 Attorney General Fax (304) 558-0140 March 21, 2019 Via E-mail and Regular Mail Attorney General William Barr U.S. Department of Justice 950 Pennsylvania Ave., NW Washington, DC 20530 Dear Attorney General Barr: We, the Attorneys General of West Virginia, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, the District of Columbia, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kentucky, Louisiana, Michigan, Mississippi, New Mexico, North Carolina, North Dakota, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, and Virginia, write to express our serious concerns regarding the Office of Legal Counsel's recent opinion, "Reconsidering Whether the Wire Act Applies to Non-Sports Gambling" ("Opinion"). We ask for an opportunity to meet with you in the near future to discuss the potentially sweeping implications of this decision to our state lotteries, as well as potential solutions that are fully consistent with both federal law and the significant needs and reliance interests of our States. We also respectfully request that the Department extend the current window for compliance reflected in Deputy Attorney General Rosenstein's Memoranda to U.S. Attorneys, Assistant Attorneys General, and the Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, until or beyond August 13, 2019. The Opinion reversed the Department's prior, 2011 interpretation of the Wire Act's scope, which had assured the States and other actors that 18 U.S.C. § 1084(a) prohibits only interstate transmission of information regarding sporting events or contests. The new Opinion, however, calls into question interstate transmissions related to all bets or wagers, even where fully authorized under relevant state law.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 in the Circuit Court of The
    IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) Court Case Number: ) UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. ) ) Defendant. ) FINAL JUDGMENT AND CONSENT DECREE Plaintiff Office of Attorney General, State of Florida, Department of Legal Affairs, by Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General of the State of Florida (hereinafter referred to as the “State of Florida”) has filed a Complaint for a permanent injunction and other relief in this matter pursuant to the Florida Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act, Chapter 501, Part II, Florida Statutes (2018) (“FDUTPA”) and the Florida Information Protection Act, Section 501.171, Florida Statutes (2018) (“FIPA”), alleging Defendant UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. (“UBER”) committed violations of FDUTPA and FIPA. Plaintiff and UBER have agreed to the Court’s entry of this Final Judgment and Consent Decree without trial or adjudication of any issue of fact or law, and without admission of any facts alleged or liability of any kind. Preamble The Attorneys General of the states and commonwealths of Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, 1 Arkansas, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii1, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland2, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah3, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, West Virginia, Wisconsin, Wyoming, and the District of Columbia (collectively, the “Attorneys General,” or the “States”) conducted an investigation under their respective State Consumer Protection Acts and Personal Information Protection Acts4 regarding the data breach involving UBER that occurred in 2016 and that UBER announced in 2017.
    [Show full text]
  • View Tax Relief Letter
    November 20, 2012 The Honorable Harry Reid The Honorable Mitch McConnell Majority Leader Minority Leader U.S. Senate U.S. Senate The Honorable John Boehner The Honorable Nancy Pelosi Speaker of the House of Representatives Minority Leader U.S. House of Representatives U.S. House of Representatives The Honorable Max Baucus The Honorable Orin Hatch Senate Finance Committee Chair Senate Finance Committee U.S. Senate Ranking Member U.S. Senate The Honorable Dave Camp The Honorable Sander Levin House Ways and Means Committee Chair House Ways and Means Committee U.S. House of Representatives Ranking Member U.S. House of Representatives Via fax Dear Majority Leader Reid, Minority Leader McConnell, Speaker Boehner, Minority Leader Pelosi, Committee Chairman Baucus, Committee Ranking Member Hatch, Committee Chairman Camp, and Committee Ranking Member Levin, As signatories to the National Mortgage Settlement, we the undersigned state attorneys general write to urge you to pass legislation extending tax relief for citizens who have mortgage debt canceled or forgiven because of financial hardship or a decline in housing values. Such legislation is currently included in Section 112 of the Family and Business Tax Cut Certainty Act of 2012 (S. 3521), which was recently passed out of the Senate Finance Committee with bipartisan support. We strongly urge Congress to extend this critical tax exclusion, which expires on December 31, 2012, so that distressed homeowners are not stuck with an unexpected tax bill or deterred from participating in this historic settlement. On February 9, 2012, 49 state attorneys general and the federal government signed a National Mortgage Settlement requiring five of the nation’s largest banks to provide $17 billion in debt reduction and other relief to homeowners.
    [Show full text]
  • Willamette Lawyer, Fall 2004
    The magazine of the first law school in the Pacific Northwest Fall 2004 ! U.S. Senator Lisa Murkowski JD’85: An AdAdvocatevocate for Alaska Special Issue NORTH TO ALASKA 1+1=3 no, it’s not new math. It’s an opportunity to double your gift and triple our money. n anonymous donor recently gave the College of Law $1 million to endow the Clinical Law Program. If the College of Law can raise $1 million by Dec. 31, 2005, this generous Adonor will give us another $1 million. That’s $1m + $1m = $3m! The Clinical Law Program, under the direction of full-time supervising attorneys, provides legal assistance to needy Oregonians while offering practical legal experience for our law students. We can use your help. Any gift you can make for the endowment of the Clinical Law Program will be doubled. Gifts and pledges can be funded with stocks, bonds, real estate and/or cash. For more information, contact Mike Bennett, Development Director, Willamette University College of Law, 245 Winter St. SE, Salem, OR 97301, or call 503-370-6761. Email: [email protected]. dean’s list of donors 2003-04 This list recognizes alumni and friends who made generous gifts of $1,000 or more to the College of Law during the 2003-04 fiscal year. We are grateful for the special support and leadership these donors provided. $25,000 + $1,000 - $2,499 Richard S. Long J. David Bennett JD’71 Kenneth D. Peterson, Jr. JD’80 and Claudia J. Peterson Ralph W. Bolliger BA’53,JD’55 Roderick C.
    [Show full text]
  • January 12, 2021 the Honorable Jeffrey A. Rosen Acting Attorney
    January 12, 2021 The Honorable Jeffrey A. Rosen Acting Attorney General U.S. Department of Justice 950 Pennsylvania Ave., NW Washington, DC 20530 Dear Acting Attorney General Rosen: We, the undersigned state attorneys general, are committed to the protection of public safety, the rule of law, and the U.S. Constitution. We are appalled that on January 6, 2021, rioters invaded the U.S. Capitol, defaced the building, and engaged in a range of criminal conduct—including unlawful entry, theft, destruction of U.S. government property, and assault. Worst of all, the riot resulted in the deaths of individuals, including a U.S. Capitol Police officer, and others were physically injured. Beyond these harms, the rioters’ actions temporarily paused government business of the most sacred sort in our system—certifying the result of a presidential election. We all just witnessed a very dark day in America. The events of January 6 represent a direct, physical challenge to the rule of law and our democratic republic itself. Together, we will continue to do our part to repair the damage done to institutions and build a more perfect union. As Americans, and those charged with enforcing the law, we must come together to condemn lawless violence, making clear that such actions will not be allowed to go unchecked. Thank you for your consideration of and work on this crucial priority. Sincerely Phil Weiser Karl A. Racine Colorado Attorney General District of Columbia Attorney General Lawrence Wasden Douglas Peterson Idaho Attorney General Nebraska Attorney General Steve Marshall Clyde “Ed” Sniffen, Jr. Alabama Attorney General Acting Alaska Attorney General Mark Brnovich Leslie Rutledge Arizona Attorney General Arkansas Attorney General Xavier Becerra William Tong California Attorney General Connecticut Attorney General Kathleen Jennings Ashley Moody Delaware Attorney General Florida Attorney General Christopher M.
    [Show full text]
  • State Attorney General Contact List Alabama Attorney
    State Attorney General Contact List Alabama Attorney General, Steve Marshall (334) 242-7300 State House, 11 S. Union St. Montgomery, AL 36130 [email protected] Alaska Attorney General, Kevin Clarkson (907) 465-3600 P.O. Box 110300, Diamond Courthouse, Juneau, AK 99811-0300 [email protected] Arizona Attorney General, Mark Brnovich (602) 542-4266 1275 W. Washington St., Phoenix, AZ 85007 [email protected] Arkansas Attorney General, Leslie Rutledge (800) 482-8982 200 Tower Bldg., 323 Center St., Little Rock, AR 72201-2610 [email protected] California Attorney General, Xavier Becerra (916) 445-9555 1300 I St., Ste. 1740, Sacramento, CA 95814 [email protected] Colorado Attorney General, Phil Weiser (303) 866-4500 1525 Sherman Street, Denver, CO 80203 [email protected] Connecticut Attorney General, William Tong (860) 808-5318 55 Elm St., Hartford, CT 06141-0120 [email protected] Delaware Attorney General, Kathy Jennings (302) 577-8338 Carvel State Office Bldg., 820 N. French St., Wilmington, DE 19801 [email protected] District of Columbia, Karl Racine (202) 724-1305 John A. Wilson Building, 1350 PA Ave, NW Suite 409, Washington, DC 20009 [email protected] Florida Attorney General, Ashley Moody (850) 414-3300 The Capitol, PL 01, Tallahassee, FL 32399-1050 [email protected] Georgia Attorney General, Chris Carr (404) 656-3300 40 Capitol Square, SW, Atlanta, GA 30334-1300 https://gbp.georgia.gov/contact-us Hawaii Attorney General, Clare Connors (808) 586-1500 425 Queen St., Honolulu, HI 96813 [email protected] Idaho Attorney General, Lawrence Wasden (208) 334-2400 Statehouse, Boise, ID 83720-1000 [email protected] Illinois Attorney General, Kwame Raoul (312) 814-3000 James R.
    [Show full text]
  • Jan 2 5 2813
    THE DEPUTY SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR WASHINGTON JAN 2 5 2813 Mr. Dan Sullivan Commissioner, Department of Natural Resources State of Alaska 550W. 7thAve. #1400 Anchorage, Alaska 99501 Dear Commissioner Sullivan: Thank you for your letter regarding the Department of the Interior's Expedited Assessment of 2012 Arctic Operations and expressing your interest in an opportunity to provide input into this process. I had the opportunity to meet with Mayor Brower and discuss the review process while she was recent! y in Washington. The Department oflnterior (Department) voluntarily chose to undertake this high-level, expedited review of Shell's activities as part of our commitment to safe and responsible exploration for energy resources in the Arctic. The review will he a retrospective of the 2012 offshore drilling season with special attention to challenges that Shell encountered in connection with certification of its containment vessel, the Arctic Challenger; the deployment testing of its containment dome; and operational issues associated with its two drilling rigs, the Noble Discoverer and the Kulluk. We aim to thoroughly review Shell's management and operations in the Beaufort and Chukchi Seas with an eye towards recognizing successes, identifying challenges and evaluating lessons learned, and ultimately informing future permitting processes in the region. The review is on a 60-day timeline to he finalized by March 8, 2013. Due to the need to expedite this process, the Department's review is not a formal investigation and does not include a review panel. Nonetheless, the review is being conducted with recognition of the need to receive input from key partners and stakeholders.
    [Show full text]