Central Sikhote-Alin Russian Federation
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Fresh- and Brackish-Water Cold-Tolerant Species of Southern Europe: Migrants from the Paratethys That Colonized the Arctic
water Review Fresh- and Brackish-Water Cold-Tolerant Species of Southern Europe: Migrants from the Paratethys That Colonized the Arctic Valentina S. Artamonova 1, Ivan N. Bolotov 2,3,4, Maxim V. Vinarski 4 and Alexander A. Makhrov 1,4,* 1 A. N. Severtzov Institute of Ecology and Evolution, Russian Academy of Sciences, 119071 Moscow, Russia; [email protected] 2 Laboratory of Molecular Ecology and Phylogenetics, Northern Arctic Federal University, 163002 Arkhangelsk, Russia; [email protected] 3 Federal Center for Integrated Arctic Research, Russian Academy of Sciences, 163000 Arkhangelsk, Russia 4 Laboratory of Macroecology & Biogeography of Invertebrates, Saint Petersburg State University, 199034 Saint Petersburg, Russia; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: Analysis of zoogeographic, paleogeographic, and molecular data has shown that the ancestors of many fresh- and brackish-water cold-tolerant hydrobionts of the Mediterranean region and the Danube River basin likely originated in East Asia or Central Asia. The fish genera Gasterosteus, Hucho, Oxynoemacheilus, Salmo, and Schizothorax are examples of these groups among vertebrates, and the genera Magnibursatus (Trematoda), Margaritifera, Potomida, Microcondylaea, Leguminaia, Unio (Mollusca), and Phagocata (Planaria), among invertebrates. There is reason to believe that their ancestors spread to Europe through the Paratethys (or the proto-Paratethys basin that preceded it), where intense speciation took place and new genera of aquatic organisms arose. Some of the forms that originated in the Paratethys colonized the Mediterranean, and overwhelming data indicate that Citation: Artamonova, V.S.; Bolotov, representatives of the genera Salmo, Caspiomyzon, and Ecrobia migrated during the Miocene from I.N.; Vinarski, M.V.; Makhrov, A.A. -
Isolation and Characterization of Brachymystax Lenok Microsatellite Loci and Cross-Species Amplification in Hucho Spp
Molecular Ecology Notes (2004) 4, 150–152 doi: 10.1111/j.1471-8286.2004.00594.x PRIMERBlackwell Publishing, Ltd. NOTE Isolation and characterization of Brachymystax lenok microsatellite loci and cross-species amplification in Hucho spp. and Parahucho perryi E. FROUFE,*† K. M. SEFC,‡ P. ALEXANDRINO*† and S. WEISS‡ *CIBIO/UP, Campus Agrário de Vairão, 4480–661, Vairão, Portugal, †Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade do Porto, Praça Gomes Teixeira, 4009–002 Porto, Portugal, ‡Karl-Franzens University Graz, Institute of Zoology, Universitätsplatz 2, A-8010 Graz, Austria Abstract We isolated and characterized eight polymorphic microsatellite markers for Brachymystax lenok (Pallas, 1773) from genomic libraries enriched for (GATA)n, (GACA)n and (ATG)n microsatellites. The number of alleles per locus ranged from two to 17. Heterozygosity ranged from 0.2 to 0.95. In addition, cross-species amplification was successful for seven loci in Hucho hucho, eight in H. taimen and seven in Parahucho perryi. Keywords: Brachymystax lenok, Hucho hucho, Hucho taimen, microsatellite, Parahucho perryi, Salmonids Received 29 October 2003; revision accepted 12 December 2003 Brachymystax lenok is a freshwater resident salmonid present and fragments in a size range of 500–1000 bp were isolated throughout eastern Siberia and portions of northern from a 2% agarose gel using the Nucleospin kit (BD Mongolia, China and Korea. Despite its wide distribution, Biosciences, Clonetech). Oligonucleotide adaptors (RBgl24, populations of this species are currently declining through 5′-AGCACTCTCCAGCCTCTCACCGCA-3′, and RBgl12, overexploitation, environmental pollution and other causes, 5′-GATCTGCGGTGA-3′) were ligated to the genomic DNA and information about them is still very scarce. Currently, fragments using T4 DNA ligase (Promega) overnight at two forms of lenok are distinguished — blunt and sharp- 4 °C. -
Lake Baikal Russian Federation
LAKE BAIKAL RUSSIAN FEDERATION Lake Baikal is in south central Siberia close to the Mongolian border. It is the largest, oldest by 20 million years, and deepest, at 1,638m, of the world's lakes. It is 3.15 million hectares in size and contains a fifth of the world's unfrozen surface freshwater. Its age and isolation and unusually fertile depths have given it the world's richest and most unusual lacustrine fauna which, like the Galapagos islands’, is of outstanding value to evolutionary science. The exceptional variety of endemic animals and plants make the lake one of the most biologically diverse on earth. Threats to the site: Present threats are the untreated wastes from the river Selenga, potential oil and gas exploration in the Selenga delta, widespread lake-edge pollution and over-hunting of the Baikal seals. However, the threat of an oil pipeline along the lake’s north shore was averted in 2006 by Presidential decree and the pulp and cellulose mill on the southern shore which polluted 200 sq. km of the lake, caused some of the worst air pollution in Russia and genetic mutations in some of the lake’s endemic species, was closed in 2009 as no longer profitable to run. COUNTRY Russian Federation NAME Lake Baikal NATURAL WORLD HERITAGE SERIAL SITE 1996: Inscribed on the World Heritage List under Natural Criteria vii, viii, ix and x. STATEMENT OF OUTSTANDING UNIVERSAL VALUE The UNESCO World Heritage Committee issued the following statement at the time of inscription. Justification for Inscription The Committee inscribed Lake Baikal the most outstanding example of a freshwater ecosystem on the basis of: Criteria (vii), (viii), (ix) and (x). -
Gap Analysis in Support of Cpan: the Russian Arctic
CAFF Habitat Conservation Report No. 9 GAP ANALYSIS IN SUPPORT OF CPAN: THE RUSSIAN ARCTIC Igor Lysenko and David Henry CAFF INTERNATIONAL SECRETRARIAT 2000 This report, prepared by Igor Lysenko, World Conservation Monitoring Centre (WCMC) and David Henry, United Nations Environment Program (UNEP) Global Resource Information Database (GRID)-Arendal, is a technical account of a Gap Analysis Project conducted for the Russian Arctic in 1997-1999 in support of the Circumpolar Protected Areas Network (CPAN) of CAFF. It updates the status and spatial distribution of protected areas within the CAFF area of the Russian Federation and provides, in 22 GIs based maps and several data sets, a wealth of information relevant for present and future management decisions related to habitat conservation in the Russian Arctic. The present Gap Analysis for the Russian Arctic was undertaken in response to the CPAN Strategy and Action Plan requirement for countries to identify gaps in protected area coverage of ecosystems and species and to select sites for further action. Another important objective was to update the Russian data base. The Analysis used a system of twelve landscape units instead of the previously used vegetation zone system as the basis to classify Russia's ecosystems. A comparison of the terrestrial landscape systems against protected area coverage indicates that 27% of the glacier ecosystem is protected, 9.3% of the tundra (treeless portion) and 4.7% of the forest systems within the Arctic boundaries are under protection, but the most important Arctic forested areas have only 0.1% protection. In general, the analysis indicates a negative relationship between ecosystem productivity and protection, which is consistent with findings in 1996. -
Chromosomal Study of the Lenoks, Brachymystax(Salmoniformes
Journal of Species Research 2(1):91-98, 2013 Chromosomal study of the lenoks, Brachymystax (Salmoniformes, Salmonidae) from the South of the Russian Far East I.V. Kartavtseva*, L.K. Ginatulina, G.A. Nemkova and S.V. Shedko Institute of Biology and Soil Science of the Far East Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Prospect 100 let Vladivostoku 159, Vladivostok 690022 *Correspondent: [email protected], [email protected] An investigation of the karyotypes of two species of the genus Brachymystax (B. lenok and B. tumensis) has been done for the Russia Primorye rivers running to the East Sea basin, and others belonging to Amur basin. Based on the analysis of two species chromosome characteristics, combined with original and literary data, four cytotypes have been described. One of these cytotypes (Cytotype I: 2n=90, NF=110-118) was the most common. This common cytotype belongs to B. tumensis from the rivers of the East Sea basin and B. lenok from the rivers of the Amur basin, i.e. extends to the zones of allopatry. In the rivers of the Amur river basin, in the zone of the sympatric habitat of two species, each taxon has karyotypes with different chromosome numbers, B. tumensis (2n=92) and B. lenok (2n=90). Because of the ability to determine a number of the chromosome arms for these two species, additional cytotype have been identified for B. tum- ensis: Cytotype II with 2n=92, NF=110-124 in the rivers basins of the Yellow sea and Amur river and for B. lenok three cytotypes: Cytotype I: 2n=90, NF=110 in the Amur river basin; Cytotype III with 2n=90, NF=106-126 in the Amur river basin and Cytotypes IV with 2n=92, NF=102 in the Baikal lake. -
Bg-2018-112-Supplement.Pdf
Details of multiple regression models results for the relationships between NRE, PRE, NRE:PRE and environmental factors (Latitude (LAT, o), mean annual precipitation (MAT, oC) and mean annual precipitation (MAP, mm)), respectively. Equations and R2 and P values describe the explanatory power of each model. Group Equation R2 P NRE All data y=1.56091+0.0036Lat 0.063 <0.0001 y=1.741650.0047MAT 0.039 <0.0001 y=1.747110.0000609MAP 0.054 <0.0001 y=1.7205+0.283461Lat0.038019MAT0.002754MAP 0.106 <0.0001 Graminoids y=1.63377+0.00225Lat 0.052 0.037 y=1.777880.00776MAT 0.073 <0.0001 y=1.776790.0000865MAP 0.038 0.002 y=1.525405+0.025707Lat0.569069MAT0.00372MAP 0.059 0.004 Forbs y=1.53428+0.00401Lat 0.088 <0.0001 y=1.714940.00297MAT 0.017 0.014 y=1.728780.0000519MAP 0.055 <0.0001 y=1.881503+0.547313Lat+0.455467MAT0.00249MAP 0.145 <0.0001 Monocots y=1.52058+0.00431Lat 0.069 <0.0001 y=1.708340.0015MAT 0.002 0.337 y=1.735440.0000621MAP 0.048 <0.0001 y=1.923174+0.090165Lat0.612721MAT0.000192MAP 0.102 <0.0001 Eudicots y=1.58939+0.00319Lat 0.058 <0.0001 y=1.772760.0071MAT 0.105 <0.0001 y=1.761330.0000623MAP 0.060 <0.0001 y=1.039314+0.514526Lat+0.47502MAT0.00428MAP 0.133 <0.0001 PRE All data y=1.67742+0.00278Lat 0.076 <0.0001 y=1.82743-0.00434MAT 0.059 <0.0001 y=1.82165-0.0000405MAP 0.055 <0.0001 y=1.463987+0.256038Lat0.152148MAT0.000796MAP 0.189 <0.0001 Graminoids y=1.71335+0.00248Lat 0.062 0.001 y=1.86398-0.00611MAT 0.119 <0.0001 y=1.85218-0.0000485MAP 0.041 0.007 y=1.716721+0.150796Lat0.743164MAT+0.001219MAP 0.134 <0.0001 Forbs y=1.67729+0.00234Lat 0.049 -
Edna Assay Development
Environmental DNA assays available for species detection via qPCR analysis at the U.S.D.A Forest Service National Genomics Center for Wildlife and Fish Conservation (NGC). Asterisks indicate the assay was designed at the NGC. This list was last updated in June 2021 and is subject to change. Please contact [email protected] with questions. Family Species Common name Ready for use? Mustelidae Martes americana, Martes caurina American and Pacific marten* Y Castoridae Castor canadensis American beaver Y Ranidae Lithobates catesbeianus American bullfrog Y Cinclidae Cinclus mexicanus American dipper* N Anguillidae Anguilla rostrata American eel Y Soricidae Sorex palustris American water shrew* N Salmonidae Oncorhynchus clarkii ssp Any cutthroat trout* N Petromyzontidae Lampetra spp. Any Lampetra* Y Salmonidae Salmonidae Any salmonid* Y Cottidae Cottidae Any sculpin* Y Salmonidae Thymallus arcticus Arctic grayling* Y Cyrenidae Corbicula fluminea Asian clam* N Salmonidae Salmo salar Atlantic Salmon Y Lymnaeidae Radix auricularia Big-eared radix* N Cyprinidae Mylopharyngodon piceus Black carp N Ictaluridae Ameiurus melas Black Bullhead* N Catostomidae Cycleptus elongatus Blue Sucker* N Cichlidae Oreochromis aureus Blue tilapia* N Catostomidae Catostomus discobolus Bluehead sucker* N Catostomidae Catostomus virescens Bluehead sucker* Y Felidae Lynx rufus Bobcat* Y Hylidae Pseudocris maculata Boreal chorus frog N Hydrocharitaceae Egeria densa Brazilian elodea N Salmonidae Salvelinus fontinalis Brook trout* Y Colubridae Boiga irregularis Brown tree snake* -
Concern About Sudden Oak Deatn Grows
The Newsletter of the International Oak Society, Volume 8, No. 2, july 2004 Concern About Sudden Oak Deatn Grows As reported in several issues of California, Oregon, Ohio, North complete and the nursery is found this newsletter, and in Proceed Carolina, and Georgia. The other to be free from the pathogen, all ings articles from the last two In San Diego County nursery con out-of-state shipments of host ternational Oak Society Symposia, ducts much of their sales through nursery stock and associated ar Sudden Oak Death or SOD is a new mail orders. This news has sent ticles, as well as plants within the disease affecting some species of shock waves through the nursery same genus as any host or asso oaks in California. The agent re and forest industries since it was ciated article, and any plant lo sponsible for this disease is feared that infected plants had cated within 10 meters of a host Phytophthora ramorum, a fungus been shipped throughout the or associated article, must remain like water mold that can girdle United States. Trace-back and on hold. For a complete list of mature trees and consequently kill trace-forward surveys were there hosts and associated plants, as them. To date this disease has fore conducted to determine well as the complete text of the been reported on four of where infected plants originated order, go to www.aphis.usda.gov/ California's 20 species of native and where they were shipped once ppq/ispm/sod/index.html. For in oaks - all members of the black they left each of the nurseries. -
Spawning and Early Life History of Mountain Whitefish in The
SPAWNING AND EARLY LIFE HISTORY OF MOUNTAIN WHITEFISH IN THE MADISON RIVER, MONTANA by Jan Katherine Boyer A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Fish and Wildlife Management MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY Bozeman, Montana January 2016 © COPYRIGHT by Jan Katherine Boyer 2016 All Rights Reserved ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS First, I thank my advisor, Dr. Christopher Guy, for challenging me and providing advice throughout every stage of this project. I also thank my committee members, Dr. Molly Webb and Dr. Tom McMahon, for guidance and suggestions which greatly improved this research. My field technicians Jordan Rowe, Greg Hill, and Patrick Luckenbill worked hard through fair weather and snowstorms to help me collect the data presented here. I also thank Travis Horton, Pat Clancey, Travis Lohrenz, Tim Weiss, Kevin Hughes, Rick Smaniatto, and Nick Pederson of Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks for field assistance and advice. Mariah Talbott, Leif Halvorson, and Eli Cureton of the U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service assisted with field and lab work. Richard Lessner and Dave Brickner at the Madison River Foundation helped to secure funding for this project and conduct outreach in the Madison Valley. The Channels Ranch, Valley Garden Ranch, Sun West Ranch, and Galloup’s Slide Inn provided crucial land and river access. I also thank my fellow graduate students both for advice on project and class work and for being excellent people to spend time with. Ann Marie Reinhold, Mariah Mayfield, David Ritter, and Peter Brown were especially helpful during the early stages of this project. -
Global Ecological Forest Classification and Forest Protected Area Gap Analysis
United Nations Environment Programme World Conservation Monitoring Centre Global Ecological Forest Classification and Forest Protected Area Gap Analysis Analyses and recommendations in view of the 10% target for forest protection under the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) 2nd revised edition, January 2009 Global Ecological Forest Classification and Forest Protected Area Gap Analysis Analyses and recommendations in view of the 10% target for forest protection under the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) Report prepared by: United Nations Environment Programme World Conservation Monitoring Centre (UNEP-WCMC) World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF) Network World Resources Institute (WRI) Institute of Forest and Environmental Policy (IFP) University of Freiburg Freiburg University Press 2nd revised edition, January 2009 The United Nations Environment Programme World Conservation Monitoring Centre (UNEP- WCMC) is the biodiversity assessment and policy implementation arm of the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), the world's foremost intergovernmental environmental organization. The Centre has been in operation since 1989, combining scientific research with practical policy advice. UNEP-WCMC provides objective, scientifically rigorous products and services to help decision makers recognize the value of biodiversity and apply this knowledge to all that they do. Its core business is managing data about ecosystems and biodiversity, interpreting and analysing that data to provide assessments and policy analysis, and making the results -
The Native Trouts of the Genus Salmo of Western North America
CItiEt'SW XHPYTD: RSOTLAITYWUAS 4 Monograph of ha, TEMPI, AZ The Native Trouts of the Genus Salmo Of Western North America Robert J. Behnke "9! August 1979 z 141, ' 4,W \ " • ,1■\t 1,es. • . • • This_report was funded by USDA, Forest Service Fish and Wildlife Service , Bureau of Land Management FORE WARD This monograph was prepared by Dr. Robert J. Behnke under contract funded by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, the Bureau of Land Management, and the U.S. Forest Service. Region 2 of the Forest Service was assigned the lead in coordinating this effort for the Forest Service. Each agency assumed the responsibility for reproducing and distributing the monograph according to their needs. Appreciation is extended to the Bureau of Land Management, Denver Service Center, for assistance in publication. Mr. Richard Moore, Region 2, served as Forest Service Coordinator. Inquiries about this publication should be directed to the Regional Forester, 11177 West 8th Avenue, P.O. Box 25127, Lakewood, Colorado 80225. Rocky Mountain Region September, 1980 Inquiries about this publication should be directed to the Regional Forester, 11177 West 8th Avenue, P.O. Box 25127, Lakewood, Colorado 80225. it TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Preface ..................................................................................................................................................................... Introduction .................................................................................................................................................................. -
Mongolian Forest Ecosystems
MONGOLIAN FOREST ECOSYSTEMS Batsukh N. WWF Mongolia Programme Office E-mail: [email protected] Mongolia has relatively low forest cover (FAO) with just over 8 percent of the country covered by closed forests. The forests are mainly located in the north-central parts of the country, forming a transition zone between the Great Siberian boreal forest and the Central Asian steppe desert. In Khentii and Khovsgol , the mountain slopes are clothed with boreal taiga forest. Due to a brief warm period, the growing season is not long enough for many plant species. It forms the most southern extension of the east Siberian taiga and consists mainly from Siberian Larch (Larix sibirica) and Siberian Pine (Pinus sibirica) and rich in mosses and lichens . Here are found a number of ungulates typical of Eurasian forests, among them Musk Deer (Moschus moschiferus), Elk (Alces alces), Roe Deer (Capreolus pugargus), and Reindeer (Rangifer tarandus). In northern Mongolia, a small number of families still herd reindeer in the traditional manner reminiscent of the Lapps of northern Europe. Forest predators include the grey wolf (Canis lupus), brown bear (Ursus arctos), wolverine (Gulo gulo), and Eurasiona lynx (Felis lynx). Typical birds of these forests include great grey owl (Strix nebulosa), boreal owl (Aegolius funereus), black-billed capercaillie (Tetrao parvirostris) and pine grosbeak (Pinicola enucleator). At yet lower altitudes, a high degree of biodiversity occurs in areas where taiga forest meets the steppes. Here mixed conifer and broadleaf forests intermingle with lush grasslands, and it is in this zone that the most heavily populated areas are found. The fauna includes species characteristic of both taiga and steppe.