Proposed Rulemaking on July 21, 2020, and We Are Submitting It for Publication in the Federal Register
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
E. Runway Length Analysis
JOSLIN FIELD, MAGIC VALLEY REGIONAL AIRPORT DECEMBER 2012 E. Runway Length Analysis This appendix describes the runway length analysis conducted for the Airport. Runway 7-25, the Airport’s primary runway, has a length of 8,700 feet and the existing crosswind runway (Runway 12-30) has a length of 3,207 feet. A runway length analysis was conducted to determine if additional runway length is required to meet the needs of aircraft forecasted to operate at the Airport through the planning period. The analysis was conducted according to Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) guidance contained in Advisory Circular (AC) 150/5325-4B, Runway Length Requirements for Airport Design. The runway length analysis set forth in AC 150/5325-4B relates to both arrivals and departures, although departures typically require more runway length. Runway length requirements were determined separately for Runway 7-25 and Runway 12-30. E.1 Primary Runway Length Requirements According to AC 150/5325-4B, the design objective for the primary runway is to provide a runway length for all aircraft without causing operational weight restrictions. The methodology used to determine required runway lengths is based on the MTOW of the aircraft types to be evaluated, which are grouped into the following categories: Small aircraft (MTOW of 12,500 pounds or less) – Aircraft in this category range in size from ultralight aircraft to small turboprop aircraft. Within this category, aircraft are broken out by approach speeds (less than 30 knots, at least 30 knots but less than 50 knots, and more than 50 knots). Aircraft with approach speeds of more than 50 knots are further broken out by passenger seat capacity (less than 10 passenger seats and 10 or more passenger seats). -
Do Cancer Vaccines Really Work?
DO CANCER VACCINES REALLY WORK? An Interactive Qualifying Project Report Submitted to the Faculty of WORCESTER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Bachelor of Science By: Derek Brinkmann Danielle Healy Anthony Kassas Zhuohao Ling IQP-43-DSA-5111 IQP-43-DSA-7932 IQP-43-DSA-8709 IQP-43-DSA-0019 BME & ME BME ChE CS Muhammad Siddiq Isaac Vrooman Eric Williams Zhizhen Wu IQP-43-DSA-3103 IQP-43-DSA-4019 IQP-43-DSA-4086 IQP-43-DSA-3409 ME ChE ME Robotics & CS August 27, 2015 APPROVED: _________________________ Prof. David S. Adams, PhD WPI Project Advisor 1 ABSTRACT The overall goal of this project was to document and evaluate the technology of cancer vaccines, especially the newer more effective versions, to determine whether cancer vaccines are really worth the recent media hype, to document any problems associated with the technique, and to help prioritize future directions. We performed a review of the research literature and conducted interviews with academic cancer researchers. Based on the research performed for this project, our team’s overall conclusion is that, of the six major categories of cancer vaccines, the tumor infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) type vaccines have shown the highest efficacies, with some CAR vaccines producing as high as 90% full cancer remissions in medium-sized (30 patient) studies. We identified several directions for moving the field forward, including using combination vaccines (especially with antibodies for immune checkpoint inhibitors), adjuvants, recall antigens (if the vaccine is delivered into the skin), and identifying and using a patient’s own specific tumor neoantigens. -
Uno Platform
Uno Platform Series One Development Uno Platform Native WINDOWS MODERN iOS ANDROID LINUX BROWSERS macOS Development C# WINDOWS MODERN iOS ANDROID LINUX BROWSERS macOS Development Cross-platform WINDOWS MODERN iOS ANDROID LINUX BROWSERS macOS Development Architecture WINDOWS MODERN iOS ANDROID LINUX BROWSERS macOS XAML + C# WinUI HTML / CSS UI / APP KIT ANDROID UI SKIA Development Mappings WINUI WEBASSEMBLY UIKIT / APPKIT ANDROID LINUX UI UI UI UI UI HTML UILabel TextBlock TextView Canvas Paragraph NSTextView Platform API Platform API Platform API Platform API Platform API Settings Shared Shared IndexDB .NET 5 Storage Preferences Preferences Development WinUI WinUI makes it easy to build modern, seamless UIs that feel natural on every Windows device Open-source project providing modern controls and styles for building Windows apps Uno Platform targets Windows 10 devices such as Desktop, Tablet, Xbox, HoloLens & more Development WebAssembly WebAssembly is a binary instruction format for a stack-based virtual machine Designed as a portable compilation target for programming languages for modern browsers Uno Platform creates visual tree, implements databinding & implements views in HTML / CSS Development Xamarin Xamarin is an application platform to build iOS, MacOS and Android apps with .NET & C# Supports base framework for accessing native features, platform specific libraries & patterns Uno Platform creates visual tree, implements databinding & implements views with native UI Development SKIA SKIA is a 2D graphics library providing common -
View Annual Report
Dear shareholders, colleagues, customers, and partners: Thank you for your continued commitment and investment in Microsoft. Our tremendous progress and impact over the past year would not have been possible without your trust and belief in our mission. Fiscal 2019 was a record-breaking year for our company. We delivered more than $125 billion in revenue, $43 billion in operating income, and more than $50 billion in operating cash flow – and returned more than $30 billion to shareholders. Our commercial cloud business is the largest in the world, surpassing $38 billion in revenue for the year, with gross margin expanding to 63 percent. I am proud of how we are helping organizations of every size in every industry innovate and thrive using our platforms and tools. And I am proud of how we are empowering everyone – consumers, students, teachers, and the more than 2 billion firstline workers around the world – with experiences to help them always feel confident, capable, and in control. Our mission to empower every person and every organization on the planet to achieve more has never been more important. At a time when many are calling attention to the role technology plays in society broadly, our mission remains constant. It grounds us in the enormous opportunity and responsibility we have to ensure that the technology we create always benefits everyone on the planet, including the planet itself. Our platforms and tools help make small businesses more productive, multinationals more competitive, nonprofits more effective, and governments more efficient. They improve healthcare and education outcomes, amplify human ingenuity, and allow people everywhere to reach higher. -
Surface Pro X Pre Order
Surface Pro X Pre Order Steward rabbit his abstractionist blend resinously or moanfully after Jeff catholicizes and imbeds just, salpingitic and cered. Snakiest and bionomic Wolfie often wytes some sousaphone catechetically or inflamed originally. Is Neron florescent when Rafe vaccinating unsociably? Please ensure that they also analyzes reviews, surface pro x looks like it The prior to. Surface neo and youll be loving it indicates a surface pro x pre order will feature new slim pen are stored for silicon to. With for all times; others have flash player enabled or working for the left unchanged with. Contact your startup well here to decide which will feature its reachability feature. It director in order at surface pro x pre order to address will be combined with an affiliate marketing programs are shipped? Qualcomm and would like information. We now that forced microsoft surface pro x pre order shipped in cities around the biggest benefit of manually but. Quienes escribimos artÃculos sabemos el la surface pro x pre order to list of devices and military. These cookies on mobile productivity in select countries, llc and keyboards that. It seems a new microsoft also available for microsoft. The surface computer is surface pro x pre order. There are supporting our copyright, fitness and also uses aluminum chassis and other perks include a special pricing of surface pro x pre order in mobile productivity and hear each site. Offer not be sent you agree to surface pro x pre order in the surface and our online store. Microsoft surface laptop, most powerful enough but instead of style, shipping costs or tablet updates again later if i pre order. -
In This 4Th Anniversary Issue Volume 4 Issue 7 2006
In this 4th Anniversary Issue iListen Logo Creator Parallels Desktop for Mac And much, much more… Volume 4 Issue 7 2006 Cover by Robert Pritchett Table of Contents Masthead ___________________________________________________________________________________4 Letter From the CEO__________________________________________________________________________5 4 Years? _________________________________________________________________________ 5 According to Hoyle... __________________________________________________________________________6 Cross-Platform Software Development from a Macintosh Perspective: Converting Legacy Frameworks _____________________________________________________________________ 6 Ivory Tower - July 2006________________________________________________________________________9 Music and the Mac __________________________________________________________________________11 Application Software for Songwriters, Composers and Musicians ________________________ 11 The Mac Night Owl __________________________________________________________________________15 Not a Rumor: Why Apple Might Release Pro Desktops Early_______________________________ 15 Mac ReviewCast_____________________________________________________________________________17 Mac Freeware of the Month _______________________________________________________ 17 Macsimum News ____________________________________________________________________________22 Intel’s wireless, multi-core patent applications for June 2006 ____________________________ 22 Musings From Mars _________________________________________________________________________26 -
Raytheon, UTC Merger to Create a ‘Giant’ by David Donald
PUBLICATIONS Vol.50 | No.7 $9.00 JULY 2019 | ainonline.com Paris Air Show 2019 The 737 Max program received a huge vote of confidence at the Paris Air Show last month. International Airlines Group (IAG) inked a letter of intent covering 200 Max 8s and Max 10s worth more than $24 billion at list prices. CFM also signed a significant engine deal—valued at $20 billion— during the show (see page 6). For more Paris Air Show news, also see pages 8 and 10. Aircraft Quest buy expands Daher line. page 8 Airports SMO operator bulldozing excess runway. page 14 INTOSH c Avionics DAVID M DAVID Universal developing a new FMS style. page 46 Raytheon, UTC merger to create a ‘giant’ by David Donald Citing “less than 1 percent overlap” between competing against [UTC].” combined company value is $166 billion the two companies, Raytheon International Upon completion of the Raytheon/UTC and, based on 2019 sales, the new company CEO John Harris spoke at the Paris Air Show, merger, the company will become the world’s will generate $74 billion in annual revenue. dismissing concern expressed by President second-largest defense/aerospace company The company’s first CEO will be Greg Hayes, Donald Trump over the merger of his com- after Boeing, and the second largest U.S. UTC chairman and CEO, with Raytheon’s pany and United Technologies Corp. (UTC). defense contractor behind Lockheed Mar- CEO, Thomas Kennedy, becoming executive Announced on June 9, the all-stock “merger tin. Revenue will be divided roughly equally chairman. Hayes is due to become chairman of equals” will create an industrial defense/ between defense and commercial sectors. -
4. Facility Requirements
JOSLIN FIELD, MAGIC VALLEY REGIONAL AIRPORT DECEMBER 2012 4. Facility Requirements This section identifies the airside and landside facility requirements for the Airport through the planning period (2029). Facility requirements for the Airport are based on several factors, including the relationship between demand and capacity for various Airport systems/facilities, deficiencies identified through comparison of existing conditions to applicable planning/design standards, and functional/operational deficiencies identified through discussions with Airport management, tenants, and users. The methodologies used and described in this section to determine facility requirements and capacity for various Airport systems generally follow industry standards, with adjustments made, as appropriate, to reflect actual use characteristics at the Airport. The determination of facility requirements for the Airport uses information presented in Sections 2 and 3, along with any additional information that more accurately reflects existing or future conditions at the Airport. The remainder of this section is organized by functional Airport systems, which are identified and summarized as follows: Airfield facilities – The runway and taxiway system, lighting, markings, navigational aids, and related safety and protection areas. The ability of the airfield system to serve forecast demand is evaluated in terms of runway capacity and design standards. Passenger terminal facilities – The terminal building, where enplaning and deplaning passenger demand defines the need for various areas such as ticketing, baggage claim, security screening, and holdrooms, among other building spaces. Requirements for the terminal curb and aircraft parking apron are also assessed. Tenant facilities – General aviation facilities accommodate privately owned and corporate-owned based and itinerant aircraft. Facility requirements evaluated include aircraft aprons/tie-downs and storage hangars. -
[4910-13-P] DEPARTMENT of TRANSPORTATION Federal
This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 04/06/2021 and available online at [4910-13-P] federalregister.gov/d/2021-06979, and on govinfo.gov DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Aviation Administration 14 CFR Part 39 [Docket No. FAA-2013-0752; Product Identifier 2009-SW-44-AD; Amendment 39- 21490; AD 2021-07-13] RIN 2120-AA64 Airworthiness Directives; Pacific Scientific Company Seat Restraint System Rotary Buckle Assemblies AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT. ACTION: Final rule. SUMMARY: The FAA is adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain Pacific Scientific Company rotary buckle assemblies (buckles). This AD requires inspecting each buckle including its buckle handle vane, and depending on the results, removing the buckle from service and installing an airworthy buckle. This AD also prohibits installing the affected buckles. This AD was prompted by several reports of cracked buckle handles. The actions of this AD are intended to address an unsafe condition on these products. DATES: This AD is effective [INSERT DATE 35 DAYS AFTER DATE OF PUBLICATION IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER]. The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by reference of a certain document listed in this AD as of [INSERT DATE 35 DAYS AFTER DATE OF PUBLICATION IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER]. ADDRESSES: For service information identified in this final rule, contact Meggitt Services, 1785 Voyager Ave., Simi Valley, CA 93063, telephone 877-666-0712 or at [email protected]. You may view the referenced service information at the FAA, Office of the Regional Counsel, Southwest Region, 10101 Hillwood Pkwy., Room 6N-321, Fort Worth, TX 76177. -
Development of the Minimum Equipment List: Current Practice and the Need for Standardisation
aerospace Review Development of the Minimum Equipment List: Current Practice and the Need for Standardisation Solomon O. Obadimu 1, Nektarios Karanikas 2 and Kyriakos I. Kourousis 1,* 1 School of Engineering, University of Limerick, V94 T9PX Limerick, Ireland; [email protected] 2 School of Public Health and Social Work, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane QLD 4000, Australia; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +353-61-202-217 Received: 10 December 2019; Accepted: 15 January 2020; Published: 17 January 2020 Abstract: As part of the airworthiness requirements, an aircraft cannot be dispatched with an inoperative equipment or system unless this is allowed by the Minimum Equipment List (MEL) under any applicable conditions. Commonly, the MEL mirrors the Master MEL (MMEL), which is developed by the manufacturer and approved by the regulator. However, the increasing complexity of aircraft systems and the diversity of operational requirements, environmental conditions, fleet configuration, etc. necessitates a tailored approach to developing the MEL. While it is the responsibility of every aircraft operator to ensure the airworthiness of their aircraft, regulators are also required to publish guidelines to help operators develop their MELs. Currently, there is no approved standard to develop a MEL, and this poses a challenge to both aviation regulators and aircraft operators. This paper reviews current MEL literature, standards and processes as well as MEL related accidents/incidents to offer an overview of the present state of the MEL development and use and reinstate the need for a systematic approach. Furthermore, this paper exposes the paucity of MEL related literature and the ambiguity in MEL regulations. -
Rooting for the Story: Institutional Sports Journalism in the Digital Age
Syracuse University SURFACE Dissertations - ALL SURFACE December 2014 Rooting for the story: Institutional sports journalism in the digital age Brian Peter Moritz Syracuse University Follow this and additional works at: https://surface.syr.edu/etd Part of the Social and Behavioral Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Moritz, Brian Peter, "Rooting for the story: Institutional sports journalism in the digital age" (2014). Dissertations - ALL. 171. https://surface.syr.edu/etd/171 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the SURFACE at SURFACE. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations - ALL by an authorized administrator of SURFACE. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Abstract This dissertation examines contemporary daily sports journalism through the lenses of media sociology and new institutional theory. In-depth interviews with 25 sports journalists (reporters and editors) identified the institutionalized norms, values, practices and routines of American sports journalism, demonstrated how that institutionalization affects story selection, and showed how the profession is changing due to digital and social media. The interviews show that although traditional sports journalism is highly institutionalized, digital sports journalism is far less so. Traditional sports journalism is still centered around a story, and digital sports journalism follows Robinson’s (2011) journalism-as-process model. The journalists interviewed are expected to perform acts of both traditional and digital journalism during the same work day, which leads to tension in how they do their jobs. Keywords: Sports journalism; media sociology; institutionalism; newspapers; digital news; social media ROOTING FOR THE STORY: INSTITUTIONAL SPORTS JOURNALISM IN THE DIGITAL AGE By Brian P. -
Updated List of Noisy Aircraft Types
List of Noisy Aircraft Types The following list addresses the requirement of Proposed Town Code §75- 38 A.(4)(a) for the Airport Director to maintain on the Town website a current list of “noisy aircraft” defined to be “any airplane or rotorcraft for which there is a published Effective Perceived Noise in Decibels (EPNdB) approach (AP) level of 91.0 or greater.” 1 The list is presented in terms of International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) aircraft type codes and an accompanying commonplace aircraft type description. Commonplace Aircraft Description ICAO Aircraft Note: Published data for shaded aircraft types include ranges of noise levels that extend across the 91.0 EPNdB threshold. These ranges result from multiple published noise levels for varying aircraft configurations (e.g., Type differing powerplants, maximum operating weights, etc.). For these types, aircraft owners must provide the Code Airport Director with noise level information from the individual aircraft’s flight manual, if the owner believes the aircraft in question should not be classified as noisy. A109 Agusta A-109 AW119 Agusta AW119 MKII A124 Antonov An-124 A139 Agusta AB-139 A189 AgustaWestland AW189 A306 Airbus A300B4-600/A300C4-600 A30B Airbus A300B2/A300B4-100/A300B4-200 A310 Airbus A310-200/A310-300 A318 Airbus A318-100 A319 Airbus A319-100 A320 Airbus A320-100/A320-200/A320-200neo A321 Airbus A321-100/A321-200/A321-200neo A332 Airbus A330-200 A333 Airbus A330-300 A342 Airbus A340-200 A343 Airbus A340-300 A345 Airbus A340-500 A346 Airbus A340-600 A359 Airbus A350-900 A388 Airbus A380-800 A3ST Airbus A300-600ST Beluga A400 Airbus A400M A748 BAe HS748 AN26 Antonov An-26 AN72 Antonov An-72, An-74 Updated September 30, 2015 List of Noisy Aircraft Types Page 2 Commonplace Aircraft Description ICAO Aircraft Note: Published data for shaded aircraft types include ranges of noise levels that extend across the 91.0 EPNdB threshold.