DOCSLIB.ORG

International-Relations-Theory-E-IR.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

EDITED BY i STEPHEN McGLINCHEY, ROSIE WALTERS & CHRISTIAN SCHEINPFLUG International Relations Theory This e-book is provided without charge via free download by E-International Relations (www.E-IR.info). It is not permitted to be sold in electronic format under any circumstances. If you enjoy our free e-books, please consider leaving a small donation to allow us to continue investing in open access publications: http://www.e-ir.info/about/donate/ i “In the plethora of textbooks on IR almost none depart from ‘playing it safe’, giving forms of instruction in the rudiments of established theories. The great breakout of this volume is its entire second half of proposing quite radical new ways of looking at the world. The book is both ‘safe’ and ‘unsafe’ and in both it is sometimes witty in a way that students will savour – learning what IR is, and what it could be. A lovely book in which even the doyens of ‘old’ IR are sometimes bold.” – Stephen Chan OBE, Professor of World Politics, School of Oriental & African Studies, University of London. “This rich volume offers a highly accessible and exceptionally broad-ranging introduction to the field of International Relations theory. In 20 short chapters the book provides a highly readable and comprehensive overview of core theoretical frameworks ranging from ‘mainstream’ realism and liberalism all the way to queer theory and critical geography. By placing each theory in context, and by providing a wealth of easily graspable examples, the book provides ‘one-stop shopping’ for the full range of theoretical frameworks and concepts – along with welcome attention to non-western perspectives. An excellent place to start.” – Mette Eilstrup-Sangiovanni, Senior University Lecturer in International Relations at Cambridge University. “This is a superb book. It offers a comprehensive listing that is imaginatively presented and enormously accessible. Helpfully, too, it takes the form of a global conversation. IR theory at its sparkling best.” – Peter Vale, Professor of Humanities, University of Johannesburg; Professor of Public Policy and Global Affairs, Nanyang Technological University and Nelson Mandela Professor of Politics Emeritus, Rhodes University. ii International Relations Theory EDITED BY STEPHEN MCGLINCHEY, ROSIE WALTERS & CHRISTIAN SCHEINPFLUG iii E-International Relations www.E-IR.info Bristol, England 2017 ISBN 978-1-910814-19-2 (paperback) ISBN 978-1-910814-20-8 (e-book) This book is published under a Creative Commons CC BY-NC 4.0 license. You are free to: • Share – copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format • Adapt – remix, transform, and build upon the material Under the following terms: • Attribution – You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use. • Non-Commercial – You may not use the material for commercial purposes. Any of the above conditions can be waived if you get permission. Please contact [email protected] for any such enquiries, including for licensing and translation requests. Other than the terms noted above, there are no restrictions placed on the use and dissemination of this book for student learning materials/scholarly use. Production: Michael Tang Copy-editing: Gill Gairdner Cover Image: feedough via Depositphotos A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library. iv E-IR Foundations Series Editor: Stephen McGlinchey Editorial Assistants: Michael Bolt, Eloise Cox, Gary Leigh and Farah Saleem. E-IR Foundations is a series of beginner’s textbooks from E-International Relations (E-IR) that are designed to introduce complicated issues in a practical and accessible way. Each book will cover a different area connected to International Relations. This is the second book in the series, with more to follow. You can find the books, and many other learning materials, on E-IR’s Student Portal: http://www.e-ir.info/students E-IR is developing our Foundations series as part of our mission to provide the best source of freely available scholarly materials for students of International Relations. Each book is available to buy in bookstores in paperback and, uniquely for textbooks, also freely accessible in web and PDF formats. So, readers can have each book at their fingertips and on all their devices without any restrictions or hassle. Typically, textbook publishing is designed to appeal to professors/lecturers and, consequently, even the introductory books are intended less as an aid to the student and more to assist the instructor in the classroom. Our books are designed to meet the needs of the student, with the focus on moving readers from no prior knowledge to competency. They are intended to accompany, rather than replace, other texts, while offering the student a fresh perspective. About E-International Relations E-International Relations is the world’s leading open access website for students and scholars of international politics, reaching over three million readers per year. E-IR’s daily publications feature expert articles, blogs, reviews and interviews – as well as student learning resources. The website is run by a non-profit organisation based in Bristol, UK and staffed by an all- volunteer team of students and scholars. http://www.e-ir.info v Acknowledgements This book would not have been possible without the assistance of E-IR’s Student Review Panel. Members of the panel gave up their spare time to read drafts of each chapter and offer their thoughts on how they could be improved. The panel comprised Laura Southgate, Matthew Koo, Constance Dijkstra, Loveleena Sharma, Daniel Golebiewski, Ljupcho Stojkovski, Max Nurnus, Jess Dam, Caroline Cottet, Jan Tattenberg, Matthew Ribar, Laura Cartner, Cameran Clayton, Phoebe Gardner, Ana Carolina Sarmento, Naomi McMillen, Kanica Rakhra, Dean Cooper-Cunningham, Jonathan Webb, Daniel Rowney, Janja R. Avgustin and Scott Edwards. The editors would also like to thank all members of the E-International Relations team, past and present, for their many acts of kindness in feeding back on ideas and providing a supportive climate for the book’s development. Finally, and most importantly, the editors would like to thank the authors of each of the chapters for working so hard on this project and helping us deliver such an excellent book. vi vii International Relations Theory Contents GETTING STARTED WITH INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS THEORY Stephen McGlinchey, Rosie Walters & Dana Gold 1 PART ONE – ESTABLISHED THEORIES 1. REALISM Sandrina Antunes & Isabel Camisão 15 2. LIBERALISM Jeffrey W. Meiser 22 3. THE ENGLISH SCHOOL Yannis A. Stivachtis 28 4. CONSTRUCTIVISM Sarina Theys 36 5. MARXISM Maïa Pal 42 6. CRITICAL THEORY Marcos Farias Ferreira 49 7. POSTSTRUCTURALISM Aishling Mc Morrow 56 8. FEMINISM Sarah Smith 62 9. POSTCOLONIALISM Sheila Nair 69 10. TOWARDS A GLOBAL IR? Amitav Acharya 76 Contents viii PART TWO – EXPANSION PACK 11. GREEN THEORY Hugh C. Dyer 84 12. GLOBAL JUSTICE Alix Dietzel 91 13. QUEER THEORY Markus Thiel 97 14. SECURITISATION THEORY Clara Eroukhmanoff 104 15. CRITICAL GEOGRAPHY Irena Leisbet Ceridwen Connon & Archie W. Simpson 110 16. ASIAN PERSPECTIVES Pichamon Yeophantong 117 17. GLOBAL SOUTH PERSPECTIVES Lina Benabdallah, Victor Adetula & Carlos Murillo-Zamora 125 18. INDIGENOUS PERSPECTIVES Jeff Corntassel & Marc Woons 131 19. A CONTEMPORARY PERSPECTIVE ON REALISM Felix Rösch & Richard Ned Lebow 138 20. THE ‘ISMS’ ARE EVIL. ALL HAIL THE ‘ISMS’! Alex Prichard 145 REFERENCES 153 NOTE ON INDEXING 166 ix International Relations Theory Contributors Victor Adetula is Head of Research at the Nordic Africa Institute, Uppsala, Sweden and Professor of International Relations and Development Studies at the University of Jos, Nigeria. Amitav Acharya is Distinguished Professor of International Relations and the UNESCO Chair in Transnational Challenges and Governance at American University, USA. Sandrina Antunes is an Assistant Professor at the Department of International Relations and Public Administration at the Universidade do Minho, Portugal and a Scientific Fellow at the Center for the Study of Politics, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Belgium. Lina Benabdallah is an Assistant Professor of Political Science at Wake Forest University, USA. Isabel Camisão is an Assistant Professor of International Relations at the University of Évora, Portugal. Irena Leisbet Ceridwen Connon is a Postdoctoral Research Fellow in Human Geography at the University of Dundee, UK. Jeff Corntassel is an Associate Professor and Director of Indigenous Governance at the University of Victoria, Canada. He is a citizen of the Cherokee Nation. Alix Dietzel is a Lecturer in Global Ethics at the University of Bristol, UK. Hugh C. Dyer is an Associate Professor of World Politics at the University of Leeds, UK. Clara Eroukhmanoff is a Lecturer in International Relations at London South Bank University, UK. Contributors x Marcos Farias Ferreira is a Lecturer in International Relations at the University of Lisbon and Instituto Universitário de Lisboa (ISCTE-IUL), Centro de Estudos Internacionais, Portugal. Dana Gold is a PhD candidate at the University of Western Ontario in London, Canada. Richard Ned Lebow is a Professor of International Political Theory at King’s College London, UK, Bye-Fellow of Pembroke College, University of Cambridge, UK and the James O. Freedman Presidential Professor (Emeritus) of Government at Dartmouth College, USA. Stephen McGlinchey is Senior Lecturer in International Relations at the University of the West of England, Bristol and Editor-in-Chief of E-International Relations. Aishling Mc Morrow is a Lecturer in International Relations at Queen’s University Belfast, UK. Jeffrey W. Meiser is an Assistant Professor in Political Science at the University of Portland, USA. Carlos Murillo-Zamora is a Professor at the University of Costa Rica and the National University of Costa Rica. Sheila Nair is Professor of Politics and International Affairs at Northern Arizona University, USA. Maïa Pal is a Senior Lecturer in International Relations at Oxford Brookes University, UK.
Recommended publications
  • HOME Larissa Behrendt

    HOME Larissa Behrendt

    1 UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND PRESS HOME Larissa Behrendt Teachers’ Notes Written by a practising high school teacher and head of department – middle school curriculum ISBN: 978 0 7022 3407 1 AU$24.95 Synopsis 2 Themes 2 Belonging 2 Marginalisation 3 Cultural Identity and 3 Aboriginality Aboriginal History and Law 3 Study Notes 4 About the Author 6 These notes may be reproduced free of charge for use and study within schools but they may not be reproduced (either in whole or in part) and offered for commercial sale. Staff House Road PO Box 6042 St Lucia QLD 4067 St Lucia QLD 4067 Ph: (+61 7) 3365 2606 [email protected] University of Queensland Press Australia Australia Fax: (+61 7) 3365 7579 www.uqp.com.au ABN 63 942 912 684 2 UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND PRESS SYNOPSIS Larissa Behrendt’s award-winning novel, Home, is a poignant look into the direct and indirect consequences of the Aboriginal stolen generation. The chain of events begins when Garibooli, a young Aboriginal girl, is removed by authorities in 1918, never to be reunited with her family. The subsequent search for identity by the generations of children stemming from Garibooli reveals scars within the Aboriginal community that can never be healed completely. Behrendt cleverly shows this search for identity and belonging in a colonial world by following the children and grandchildren of Garibooli, as Garibooli was made to feel too ashamed to pass on her heritage to her progeny. The numerous characters give human faces and experiences to a highly politicised issue in contemporary Australian society, making Home a solid text in which to explore these issues in the classroom.
  • Meet the 2020 Chinese Consumer

    Meet the 2020 Chinese Consumer

    McKinsey Consumer & Shopper Insights Meet the 2020 Chinese Consumer McKinsey Insights China McKinsey Consumer & Shopper Insights March 2012 Meet the 2020 Chinese Consumer Yuval Atsmon Max Magni Lihua Li Wenkan Liao The authors gratefully acknowledge the assistance of their colleagues: Molly Liu, Cherie Zhang, Barry Liu, Rachel Zheng, Justin Peng, William Cheng, Glenn Leibowitz, Joanne Mason. 5 Contents Introduction 6 1. China at a turning point 8 2. Getting the basics right: changing demographics 12 Mainstream consumers driving income growth 13 Aging population 17 Postponed life stages 18 Increasingly independent women 18 3. Understanding the mainstream consumer: new spending patterns 20 Growing discretionary spending 21 Aspirations-driven trading up 22 Emerging senior market 23 Evolving geographic differences 24 4. Understanding the mainstream consumer: behavioral patterns 26 The still-pragmatic consumer 27 The individual consumer 27 The increasingly loyal consumer 28 The modern shopper 29 5. Preparing for the 2020 consumer: implications for companies 34 Strategic imperatives 35 Growth enablers 37 Conclusion 37 Introduction Meet the 2020 Chinese consumer 7 Most large, consumer-facing companies have long realized that they will need China’s growth to power their own in the next decade. But to keep pace, they will also need to understand the economic, societal, and demographic changes that are shaping consumers’ profiles and the way they spend. This is no easy task, not only because of the fast pace of growth and subsequent changes being wrought on the Chinese way of life, but also because there are vast economic and demographic differences across China. These are set to become more marked, with significant implications for companies that fail to grasp them.
  • Contemporary Jurisprudence and International

    Contemporary Jurisprudence and International

    THE YALE LAW JO UR NA L VOLUME 61 MAY 1952 NUMBER 5 CONTEMPORARYJURISPRUDENCE AND INTERNATIONAL LAW* F.S. C.NORTHROPt WORLDsurvival and progress in an atomic epoch depends on an effective international law. Yet several recent students of the subject conclude that any further attempt to improve international relations by legal means is not merely unrealistic and impractical, but also likely to result in more harm than good. Is this to be the final verdict? The purpose of this inquiry is to answer this question by analyzing the major contemporary theories of jurisprudence and their bearing on international law. LEGAL POSITIVISM Legal positivism delimits the subject matter of law to the cases and proposi- tions in law books and to the legal institutions which apply those propositions. In domestic law this restriction of the law to the positive law has been found wanting. Dean Roscoe Pound's strictures against this "give-it-up" philosophy are well known.1 Justice Holmes' and Brandeis' pragmatic conception of law as a social instrument for facing and resolving social problems rather than running away from them is now a commonplace. Increasingly important is Myres McDougal's observation that not merely British legal positivism but also American legal realism leave one with a type of law which is incapable of meeting either the opportunities or responsibilities of the contemporary world.2 It has remained, however, for a legal positivist, P. E. Corbett, to give the final reductio ad absurdurn to such a system of jurisprudence in his Law and Society in the Relations of States.3 Consider, for example, the theory of auto-limitation introduced by Jellinek to account for legal obligation in international law.
  • Developmentalism, Modernity, and Dependency Theory in Latin America

    Developmentalism, Modernity, and Dependency Theory in Latin America

    Developmentalism, Modernity, and Dependency Theory in Latin America Ramón Grosfoguel The Latin American dependentistas produced a knowledge that criticized the Eurocentric assumptions of the cepalistas,includingtheorthodoxMarxistandtheNorthAmericanmodern- ization theories. The dependentista school critique of stagism and develop- mentalism was an important intervention that transformed the imaginary of intellectual debates in many parts of the world. However, I will argue that many dependentistas were still caught in the developmentalism, and in some cases even the stagism, that they were trying to overcome. Moreover, although the dependentistas’ critique of stagism was important in denying the “denial of coevalness” that Johannes Fabian (1983) describes as central to Eurocentric constructions of “otherness,” some dependentistas replaced it with new forms of denial of coevalness. The first part of this article dis- cusses developmentalist ideology and what I call “feudalmania” as part of the longue durée of modernity in Latin America. The second part discusses the dependentistas’ developmentalism. The third part is a critical discussion of Fernando Henrique Cardoso’s version of dependency theory. Finally, the fourth part discusses the dependentistas’ concept of culture. Developmentalist Ideology and Feudalmania as Part of the Ideology of Modernity in Latin America There is a tendency to present the post-1945 development debates in Latin America as unprecedented. In order to distinguish continuity from dis- continuity, we must place the 1945–90 development debates in the context of the longue durée of Latin American history. The 1945–90 development Nepantla: Views from South 1:2 Copyright 2000 by Duke University Press 347 348 Nepantla debates in Latin America, although seemingly radical, in fact form part of the longue durée of the geoculture of modernity that has dominated the modern world-system since the French Revolution in the late eighteenth century.
  • Introduction: Places Post-Colonialism Forgot (And How to Find Them)

    Introduction: Places Post-Colonialism Forgot (And How to Find Them)

    Introduction: Places Post-Colonialism Forgot (and How to Find Them) David Butz1 Brock University [email protected] The four papers in this themed issue had their first public airing in a session titled “Places Post-Colonialism Forgot: New Examinations of Center and Periphery” at the 2009 Las Vegas AAG Meetings. The session was co-organised by Karen Morin and Tamar Rothenberg, and sponsored by the Indigenous Peoples Specialty Group, the Socialist and Critical Geography Specialty Group, and the Historical Geography Specialty Group; I was one of the discussants. The papers’ thematic coherence as a set hinges on two similarities. Each piece focuses on something that its author or authors think post-colonial analysis has overlooked or excluded – ways that groups constitute themselves, experiences of subordination, diasporic identities, and ongoing peripheralizations. And each paper deals in its way with the effects of centre/periphery dichotomies. Pamela Shurmer-Smith provides a glimpse at the remembrances, lives and identities of former White Northern Rhodesians who now, in diaspora, find themselves in locations that are peripheral to what remain the geographical centres of their identity; Ian Baird argues that the core concepts of post-colonial studies peripheralize certain instances of colonialism; Ellis draws from her research on middle class political formations in Chennai, India, to criticize post-colonial scholarship on India for relegating class to the peripheries of its analyses; Karen Morin and Tamar Rothenberg draw attention to pervasive centre/periphery binaries 1 Creative Commons licence: Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works ACME: An International E-Journal for Critical Geographies, 2011, 10 (1), 42-47 43 in the social and spatial configuration of higher education.
  • Fourth World Nation: a Critical Geography of Decline

    Fourth World Nation: a Critical Geography of Decline

    FOURTH WORLD NATION: A CRITICAL GEOGRAPHY OF DECLINE by Olon Frederick Dotson A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of Purdue University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of American Studies West Lafayette, Indiana August 2019 2 THE PURDUE UNIVERSITY GRADUATE SCHOOL STATEMENT OF COMMITTEE APPROVAL Dr. Bill Mullen, Chair College of Liberal Arts, American Studies Dr. Leonard Harris College of Liberal Arts, American Studies Dr. Cornelius Bynum College of Liberal Arts, American Studies Dr. Stephen Paul O’Hara Xavier University, Department of History Approved by: Dr. Rayvon Fouché Head of the Graduate Program 3 This research effort is dedicated to Cloice C. Dotson. Without exception, you have been all that a father is supposed to be. If I could only begin to approach the level of responsibility and devotion that you have demonstrated as a father and mentor to me, you can be assured that your grandchildren, and someday, their children, will be able to make their way in this Fourth World Nation. With love and gratitude, Your son. 4 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS My late mother, my motherly stepmother, my sisters and brother, my friends and colleagues Wes, Lisa, Karen, Pam, Ted, Nihal, John, Michael and John, staff and faculty at Ball State, (first encouraged me to pursue doctoral studies) my Committee Chair: Bill Mullen, and Committee Members, Leonard Harris and Cornelius L. Bynum, my external committee member S. Paul O’Hara, Richard Hogan, Nathalia Jaramillo, Rayvon Fouche’, folk in the trenches, the late Grace Lee Boggs, the late Reverend Emory Davis, Malik Yakini, Imhotep Adisa, Pam Dorr, David Elkins, Wayne Curtis, Myrtle Thompson, Sylvester Brown, Elizabeth Patton-Whiteside.
  • Cultural Orientation | Kurmanji

    Cultural Orientation | Kurmanji

    KURMANJI A Kurdish village, Palangan, Kurdistan Flickr / Ninara DLIFLC DEFENSE LANGUAGE INSTITUTE FOREIGN LANGUAGE CENTER 2018 CULTURAL ORIENTATION | KURMANJI TABLE OF CONTENTS Profile Introduction ................................................................................................................... 5 Government .................................................................................................................. 6 Iraqi Kurdistan ......................................................................................................7 Iran .........................................................................................................................8 Syria .......................................................................................................................8 Turkey ....................................................................................................................9 Geography ................................................................................................................... 9 Bodies of Water ...........................................................................................................10 Lake Van .............................................................................................................10 Climate ..........................................................................................................................11 History ...........................................................................................................................11
  • Promoting International Security Through Cooperation – Nato’S Key to Success

    Promoting International Security Through Cooperation – Nato’S Key to Success

    PROMOTING INTERNATIONAL SECURITY THROUGH COOPERATION – NATO’S KEY TO SUCCESS Daniel GHIBA Lieutenant-colonel, PhD, Associate professor, National Defense University “Carol I” Member in the National Committee for Food Security and Strategy of the Academy of Romanian Scientists. [email protected] Abstract: The center of gravity of NATO's success has always been provided by the ability to promote security and stability through cooperation, based on shared values and democratic characteristics of a system based more and more on the concept of increased justice. Keywords: NATO, international security, comprehensive approach, transformation, cooperation, cooperative security, globalization. Introduction The contemporary world is in constant change and transformation, subject to changes required by the evolutionary transformations, and innovations, having as catalyst the process of globalization, characterized by multiple resizing and resetting of traditional systems, of values, concepts, resources and actions as they were known before. We are seeing the reconfiguration of the "World" into a new version, based on multidimensionality, interdependence and increased inter-determination which are evolving rapidly and irreversibly at this stage, from a “Multipolar world” to an “Interpolar world”, with direct consequences, especially in the political, economic, military, social and environmental domain. Following the same trend, the threats and challenges of the beginning of this century and millennium have become regional and global, new risks being added to the classic ones and appearing new threats and challenges with a prominent transnational character such terrorism, cyber threats, corruption and transnational organized crime and proliferation of weapons of mass destruction. The “frozen conflicts” experienced dangerous developments and created potentially violent ethnic and religious disagreements, involving new political and economic dimensions by the collapse of traditional structures.
  • Assessing International Democracy Assistance: Key Lessons and Challenges Lise Rakner, Alina Rocha Menocal and Verena Fritz

    Assessing International Democracy Assistance: Key Lessons and Challenges Lise Rakner, Alina Rocha Menocal and Verena Fritz

    Project Briefing No 14 • August 2008 Assessing international democracy assistance: Key lessons and challenges Lise Rakner, Alina Rocha Menocal and Verena Fritz n 2006-2007, the Overseas Development ratisation has been a prominent issue in inter- Institute (ODI) and the Chr. Michelsen national policy-making and many bilateral and Institute (CMI) carried out a study on multilateral organisations, as well as national international democracy assistance – or and international non-governmental organisa- Idonor efforts to help build and/or strengthen tions, have strived to support democracy. democratic governance in developing coun- Yet, in the new millennium, the ‘democratic tries undergoing democratic transitions – as optimism’ linked to the global triumph of part of a broader project on ‘Good Governance, democracy has given way to more sober apprais- Aid Modalities and Poverty Reduction’ com- als about the health of democratic systems in missioned by Irish Aid. This Project Briefing the developing world. Initial expectations that summarises the key findings of that study. It countries experiencing democratic transitions provides a broad overview of the democratisa- would move in a linear fashion towards consoli- Key points tion processes that have swept across Africa, dated, institutionalised democracies have not Asia, and Latin America since the 1980s, and been met. Instead, most of these countries now • The central challenge for highlights some of the main lessons and impli- occupy a precarious middle ground between international democracy cations for international democracy assistance outright authoritarianism and full-fledged assistance is how to to inform future donor practice. democracy, while a number of others has expe- support ‘hybrid’ regimes rienced (partial) reversals to authoritarianism (see Table 1).
  • Historical Sociology in International Relations: Open Society, Research Programme and Vocation

    Historical Sociology in International Relations: Open Society, Research Programme and Vocation

    George Lawson Historical sociology in international relations: open society, research programme and vocation Article (Accepted version) (Refereed) Original citation: Lawson, George (2007) Historical sociology in international relations: open society, research programme and vocation. International politics, 44 (4). pp. 343-368. DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.ip.8800195 © 2007 Palgrave Macmillan This version available at: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/2742/ Available in LSE Research Online: August 2012 LSE has developed LSE Research Online so that users may access research output of the School. Copyright © and Moral Rights for the papers on this site are retained by the individual authors and/or other copyright owners. Users may download and/or print one copy of any article(s) in LSE Research Online to facilitate their private study or for non-commercial research. You may not engage in further distribution of the material or use it for any profit-making activities or any commercial gain. You may freely distribute the URL (http://eprints.lse.ac.uk) of the LSE Research Online website. This document is the author’s final manuscript accepted version of the journal article, incorporating any revisions agreed during the peer review process. Some differences between this version and the published version may remain. You are advised to consult the publisher’s version if you wish to cite from it. Historical Sociology in International Relations: Open Society, Research Programme and Vocation Article for International Politics forum on Historical Sociology April 2006 Abstract Over the last twenty years, historical sociology has become an increasingly conspicuous part of the broader field of International Relations (IR) theory, with advocates making a series of interventions in subjects as diverse as the origins and varieties of international systems over time and place, to work on the co-constitutive relationship between the international realm and state-society relations in processes of radical change.
  • Foreign Policy Analysis

    Foreign Policy Analysis

    FOREIGN POLICY ANALYSIS (listed in catalogue as Theoretical Explanations of Foreign Policy) Pol Sci 530 Jack S. Levy Rutgers University Spring 2014 Hickman 304 848/932-1073 [email protected] http://fas-polisci.rutgers.edu/levy/ Office Hours: after class and by appointment This seminar focuses on how states formulate and implement their foreign policies. Foreign Policy Analysis is a well-defined subfield within the International Relations field, with its own sections in the International Studies Association and American Political Science Association (Foreign Policy Analysis and Foreign Policy, respectively). Our orientation in this course is more theoretical and process-oriented than substantive or interpretive. We focus on policy inputs and the decision-making process rather than on policy outputs. An important assumption underlying this course is that the processes through which foreign policy is made have a considerable impact on the substantive content of policy. We follow a loose a levels-of-analysis framework to organize our survey of the theoretical literature on foreign policy. We examine rational state actor, bureaucratic/ organizational, institutional, societal, and psychological models. We look at the government decision-makers, organizations, political parties, private interests, social groups, and mass publics that have an impact on foreign policy. We analyze the various constraints within which each of these sets of actors must operate, the nature of their interactions with each other and with the society as a whole, and the processes and mechanisms through which they resolve their differences and formulate policy. Although most (but not all) of our reading is written by Americans and although much of it deals primarily with American foreign policy, most of these conceptual frameworks are much more general and not restricted to the United States.
  • Theories of International Relations* Ole R. Holsti

    Theories of International Relations* Ole R. Holsti

    Theories of International Relations* Ole R. Holsti Universities and professional associations usually are organized in ways that tend to separate scholars in adjoining disciplines and perhaps even to promote stereotypes of each other and their scholarly endeavors. The seemingly natural areas of scholarly convergence between diplomatic historians and political scientists who focus on international relations have been underexploited, but there are also some signs that this may be changing. These include recent essays suggesting ways in which the two disciplines can contribute to each other; a number of prizewinning dissertations, later turned into books, by political scientists that effectively combine political science theories and historical materials; collaborative efforts among scholars in the two disciplines; interdisciplinary journals such as International Security that provide an outlet for historians and political scientists with common interests; and creation of a new section, “International History and Politics,” within the American Political Science Association.1 *The author has greatly benefited from helpful comments on earlier versions of this essay by Peter Feaver, Alexander George, Joseph Grieco, Michael Hogan, Kal Holsti, Bob Keohane, Timothy Lomperis, Roy Melbourne, James Rosenau, and Andrew Scott, and also from reading 1 K. J. Holsti, The Dividing Discipline: Hegemony and Diversity in International Theory (London, 1985). This essay is an effort to contribute further to an exchange of ideas between the two disciplines by describing some of the theories, approaches, and "models" political scientists have used in their research on international relations during recent decades. A brief essay cannot do justice to the entire range of theoretical approaches that may be found in the current literature, but perhaps those described here, when combined with citations of some representative works, will provide diplomatic historians with a useful, if sketchy, map showing some of the more prominent landmarks in a neighboring discipline.