Empire Properties
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Historic Architecture Survey for Raleigh Union Station, Phase II - RUS Bus Project Wake County, North Carolina
Historic Architecture Survey for Raleigh Union Station, Phase II - RUS Bus Project Wake County, North Carolina New South Associates, Inc. Historic Architecture Survey for Raleigh Union Station, Phase II – RUS Bus Project Wake County, North Carolina Report submitted to: WSP • 434 Fayetteville Street • Raleigh, North Carolina 27601 Report prepared by: New South Associates • 1006 Yanceyville Street • Greensboro, North Carolina 27405 Mary Beth Reed – Principal Investigator Brittany Hyder – Historian and Co-Author Sherry Teal – Historian and Co-Author July 16, 2020 • Final Report New South Associates Technical Report 4024 HISTORIC ARCHITECTURE SURVEY OF RALEIGH UNION STATION, PHASE II – RUS BUS PROJECT, WAKE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA i MANAGEMENT SUMMARY New South Associates, Inc. (New South) completed a historic architecture survey for the proposed Research Triangle Regional Public Transportation (dba GoTriangle) Project in downtown Raleigh, Wake County, North Carolina. The proposed project, termed RUS Bus, would include the construction of a facility on three parcels (totaling approximately 1.72 acres) owned by GoTriangle at 200 South West Street, 206 South West Street, and 210 South West Street. The existing buildings on the parcels would be demolished as part of the project except for the westernmost wall adjacent to the railroad. The prime consultant, WSP, is under contract with GoTriangle. The project is funded by the Federal Transit Authority (FTA) and, therefore, it must comply with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and the regulations of Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA), as amended. The work adhered to the procedures and policies established by the North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office (HPO) for compliance with Section 106, as specified in 36 Code of Federal Regulation (CFR) 800. -
Historic Properties Commission 1961 ‐ 1972 Activities and Accomplishments
HISTORIC PROPERTIES COMMISSION 1961 ‐ 1972 ACTIVITIES AND ACCOMPLISHMENTS 1961 – 1967 ▫ Improved City Cemetery and repaired Jacob Johnson monument ▫ Established Capital City Trail in collaboration with Woman’s Club ▫ Published brochures ▫ Laid foundation for interest and education regarding early post office building, Richard B. Haywood House, Mordecai House ▫ Marked historic sites, including Henry Clay Oak and sites in Governorʹs Mansion area June 1967 ▫ Instrumental in passing local legislation granting City of Raleigh’s historic sites commission additional powers ▫ City acquired Mordecai House ▫ Mordecai property turned over to commission to develop and supervise as historic park (first example in state) December 1967 ▫ Partnered with Junior League of Raleigh to publish the book North Carolinaʹs Capital, Raleigh June 1968 ▫ Moved 1842 Anson County kitchen to Mordecai Square, placing it on approximate site of former Mordecai House kitchen August 1968 ▫ City Council approved Mordecai development concept November 1968 ▫ City purchased White‐Holman House property; commission requested to work on solution for preserving house itself; section of property utilized as connector street March 1969 ▫ Supervised excavation of Joel Lane gravesite April 1969 ▫ Collaborated with City to request funds for HUD grant to develop Mordecai Square June 1969 ▫ Lease signed for White‐Holman House September 1969 ▫ Blount Street preservation in full swing May 1970 ▫ Received $29,750 HUD grant for Mordecai development June 1970 ▫ Two ʺPACEʺ students inventoried -
Boylan Heights District Has Boun4sr1es Whicll Are Essentially Eont1guoua with the Original Plats
NPSF-1NOD -United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Inventory-Nomination Form See Instructions In How to Complete National Register Forms Type sll entries-complete applicable sections ·1. Name hlatorlc Boylan Hefl:rhts · · ' ,', -·' and/or common 2. Location · street & number See conti nnat jan sheet _not for publication city, town Raleigh _vicinity of · Fourth · . state North CarolU.. 037 county Wake ' • ~· J Ccide' 183 3. Classification ·Category Ownenhlp ...tu. Pra.. ntu .. X- district _public -X- occupied _ agriculture• -museum _building( a) _private .JL unoccupied x_ commerctsl _perk _structure X-botlt _work In progress x_ educational .....X. private residence -'-site Public Acquleltloa AcceMibl• _entertainment _religious . ·-Object _In process _x_ yes: rsatrlcted _. government _scientific -.being considered. _ yes: unrestricted _ lndustrtsl _transportation N/A .JLno _military -other: 4. Owner of Property name See continuation. sheet. street & number city, town. _vicinity of ..... 5. Location of Legal Description courthouss, registry otdeeds, etc. Wake County Register of Deeds. street a number Fayetteville Street city, town Raleigh stete N. C. 6. Representation in Existing Surveys William B. Bushong, Historical Re- utle search/Or. Charlotte V. Brown·, has this proparty been determined eligible? -yes _no Architectural Historian date July 8, 1982 _federal _atate _county _local depository tor survey records city, town Raleigh state N. C. NPS FOIIIl 10o80Q.a. , ·-United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National. Register of Historic Places Inventory-Nomination Form Continuation sheet Item number 10 Page 1 BOUNDARY DESCRIPTIOII the propose<! Boylan Heights district has boun4sr1es whicll are essentially eont1guoua with the original plats. -
Raleigh, North Carolina
Coordinates: 35°46′N 78°38′W Raleigh, North Carolina Raleigh (/ˈrɑːli/; RAH-lee)[6] is the capital of the state of North Carolina and the seat of Wake County in the United States. Raleigh is known as the "City of Oaks" for its many Raleigh, North Carolina [7] oak trees, which line the streets in the heart of the city. The city covers a land area of State capital city 147.6 square miles (382 km2). The U.S. Census Bureau estimated the city's population as City of Raleigh 474,069 as of July 1, 2019.[4] It is one of the fastest-growing cities in the country.[8][9] The city of Raleigh is named after Walter Raleigh, who established the lost Roanoke Colony in present-day Dare County. Raleigh is home to North Carolina State University (NC State) and is part of the Research Triangle together with Durham (home of Duke University and North Carolina Central University) and Chapel Hill (home of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill). The name of the Research Triangle (often shortened to the "Triangle") originated after the 1959 creation of Research Triangle Park (RTP), located in Durham and Wake counties, among the three cities and their universities. The Triangle encompasses the U.S. Census Bureau's Raleigh-Durham-Cary Combined Statistical Area (CSA), which had an estimated population of 2,037,430 in 2013.[10] The Raleigh metropolitan statistical area had an estimated population of 1,390,785 in 2019.[11] Most of Raleigh is located within Wake County, with a very small portion extending into Durham County.[12] The towns of Cary, Morrisville, Garner, Clayton, Wake Forest, Apex, Holly Springs, Fuquay-Varina, Knightdale, Wendell, Zebulon, and Rolesville are some of Raleigh's primary nearby suburbs and satellite towns. -
Design Guidelines for Raleigh Historic Districts
Design Guidelines for Raleigh Historic Districts R ALEIGH H ISTORIC D ISTRICTS C OMMISSION Design Guidelines for Raleigh Historic Districts Adopted by Raleigh Historic Districts Commission: June 19, 2001 Adopted by Raleigh City Council: June 19, 2001 Effective Date: July 22, 2001 R ALEIGH H ISTORIC D ISTRICTS C OMMISSION R ALEIGH H ISTORIC D ISTRICTS C OMMISSION Raleigh City Council Mayor: Paul Y. Coble Mayor Pro Tem: John H. Odom Members: O. Morton Congleton, Julie Shea Graw, W. Benson Kirkman, Marc Scruggs, Keiran Joseph Shanahan, James West Raleigh Historic Districts Commission, Inc. Chair: C. Allen Burris Vice-Chair: Terry M. Harper Secretary/Treasurer: Jane Thurman Members: Bob Anderson, David R. Black, David Bonomo, Daniel W. Figgins, Alpha L. Howze, Jr., Treva M. Jones, Andy Lawrence, Flora J. Hatley Wadelington, James E. Williams Design Guidelines Revision Committee Chair: Stuart Bass Commission members: Frank Branan, Terry M. Harper, Bruce Markey Historic district representatives: Janet Wellman, Ingrid Wood Commission staff: Dan Becker, Margaret Long Stephenson Other city staff: Ira Botvinick, Marion Clark State Historic Preservation Office staff: Paul Fomberg, Melinda Coleman Project Consultant Jo Ramsay Leimenstoll Ramsay Leimenstoll, Architect 629 South Elm Street, P.O. Box 823, Greensboro, North Carolina 27402-0823 Editing and page formatting by Margo Johnson Edelfelt Johnson, Chapel Hill, North Carolina Acknowledgments The activity that is the subject of this design guidelines publication has been financed in part with federal funds from the National Park Service, Department of the Interior. However, the contents and opinions do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the Department of the Interior, nor does the mention of trade names or commercial products constitute endorsement or recommendation by the Department of the Interior. -
East Raleigh-South Park Historic District______Other Names/Site Number
NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-001 a (Rev. 8-66) i-.:' r United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places NATIONAL Registration Form REGISTER This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations of eligibility for individual properties or districts. See instructions in Guidelines tor Completing National Register Forms (National Register Bulletin 16). Complete each item by marking "x" in the appropriate box or by entering tha requested information. If an item does not appry to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, styles, materials, and are&s of significance, enter only the categories and subcategories listed in the instructions. For additional space use continuation sheets (Form 10-900a). Type all entries. 1. Name of Property__________________________________________________ historic name East Raleigh-South Park Historic District__________________ other names/site number 2, Location_All or part of 48 blocks east and southeast street & number of the central business district N/Al_[not for publication city, town Raleigh N/A[_I vicinity state North Carolina code NC county Wake code 183 zip code 27601 3. Classification Ownership of Property Category of Property Number of Resources within Property S private f~H building(s) Contributing Noncontributing [j|3 public-local fxl district 532 JLZJ3_ buildings [_] public-State CJsite ____ ____ sites [~7] public-Federal I I structure ____ ____ structures I I object ____ ____ objects 532 1 1 6 Total Name of related multiple property listing: Number of contributing resources previously N/A listed in the National Register 3_ 4. -
Historical Analysis
South West Raleigh Historical Analysis Joshua McCarty 6/15/2012 Table of Contents Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 3 Methodology ................................................................................................................................................. 3 Historic Zones ................................................................................................................................................ 3 Downtown Warehouse District................................................................................................................. 3 Residential Expansions .............................................................................................................................. 5 Residential Expansions: Description and Reasoning ............................................................................. 5 Boylan Heights ...................................................................................................................................... 6 Glenwood Brooklyn............................................................................................................................... 7 Cameron Park and Cameron Village ..................................................................................................... 8 St. Mary’s College............................................................................................................................... -
Modern Conveniences”: Multi-Family Housing Choice, the Apartment, and the Modernization of Raleigh, North Carolina, 1918-1929
MESZAROS, ELIZABETH PAIGE, Ph.D. “All Modern Conveniences”: Multi-family Housing Choice, the Apartment, and the Modernization of Raleigh, North Carolina, 1918-1929. (2012) Directed by Dr. Lisa Tolbert. 356 pp. This dissertation argues that city planners and boosters in 1920’s Raleigh, North Carolina, advocated that she was to be a “residence city” based on single- family homes in exclusive suburbs for the white middle-class. However, both realtor-developers and private homeowners chipped away at the symbol of the “residence city.” Raleigh was to be modern, but it was a modernity based not just on the rhetoric of city leaders who emphasized the single-family home. It was a modernity based on the actions and desires of realtor-developers who were anxious to exploit the new architectural form of the apartment house. It was also a modernity based on the decisions of individual, private, homeowners to incorporate non-family members into their households to earn additional income and contribute to their family’s economic prosperity. Homeowners in some ways rejected the “residence city” because they rented out portions of their homes to non-family members. In other ways, they embraced the symbols of the white, affluent, suburb by insisting on architectural solutions, such as porches and private entrances, which emphasized the value of privacy and by complying with restrictive housing covenants which barred sale or rental of properties to African Americans in perpetuity. Realtor-developers also rejected the “residence city” because they chose to invest money in multi-family apartment houses in addition to single-family home developments like Boylan Heights, Cameron Park, Glenwood-Brooklyn, and Oakwood.