Download the Magic Prism : an Essay in the Philosophy of Language

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Download the Magic Prism : an Essay in the Philosophy of Language The Magic Prism : An Essay in the Philosophy of Language: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language, Riverside Howard Wettstein Professor of Philosophy University of California, Oxford University Press, 2004, 0198036426, 9780198036425, 256 pages. The late 20th century saw great movement in the philosophy of language, often critical of the fathers of the subject-Gottlieb Frege and Bertrand Russell-but sometimes supportive of (or even defensive about) the work of the fathers. Howard Wettstein's sympathies lie with the critics. But he says that they have often misconceived their critical project, treating it in ways that are technically focused and that miss the deeper implications of their revolutionary challenge. Wettstein argues that Wittgenstein-a figure with whom the critics of Frege and Russell are typically unsympathetic-laid the foundation for much of what is really revolutionary in this late 20th century movement. The subject itself should be of great interest, since philosophy of language has functioned as a kind of foundation for much of 20th century philosophy. But in fact it remains a subject for specialists, since the ideas are difficult and the mode of presentation is often fairly technical. In this book, Wettstein brings the non-specialist into the conversation (especially in early chapters); he also reconceives the debate in a way that avoids technical formulation. The Magic Prism is intended for professional philosophers, graduate students, and upper division undergraduates.. DOWNLOAD HERE Reference and Description The Case against Two-Dimensionalism, Scott Soames, Feb 9, 2009, Philosophy, 384 pages. In this book, Scott Soames defends the revolution in philosophy led by Saul Kripke, Hilary Putnam, and David Kaplan against attack from those wishing to revive descriptivism in .... The Philosophy of Language , Aloysius Martinich, 2001, Philosophy, 599 pages. What is meaning? How is linguistic communication possible? What is the nature of language? What is the relationship between language and the world? How do metaphors work? The .... The Philosophy of Language , Aloysius Martinich, Nov 14, 2008, Language Arts & Disciplines, 1544 pages. Philosophical Analysis in the Twentieth Century: The dawn of ..., Volume 1 The dawn of analysis. volume 1, Scott Soames, 2003, Analysis (Philosophy), 411 pages. Introduction Г la philosophie du langage , Daniel Laurier, 1993, Language and languages, 322 pages. Content, Cognition, and Communication : Philosophical Papers II Philosophical Papers II, Nathan Salmon, Mar 29, 2007, Philosophy, 384 pages. Nathan Salmon presents a selection of his essays from the early 1980s to 2006, on a set of closely connected topics central to analytic philosophy. The book is divided into .... Modern Philosophy of Language , Maria Baghramian, 1998, Language Arts & Disciplines, 376 pages. In our century, philosophers have become increasingly concerned with the relationship between language, the mind, and the world. Language has come to be viewed both as a source .... Mind: a quarterly review of psychology and philosophy, Volume 14 a quarterly review of psychology and philosophy, Oxford University Press, Mind Association, Oxford Journals (Firm), 1905, , . Issues for 1896-1900 contain papers of the Aristotelian Society.. Continuum Companion to the Philosophy of Language , Manuel Garcia-Carpintero, Max Kolbel, Mar 15, 2012, Language Arts & Disciplines, 304 pages. With chapters written by leading international scholars in the field, this is an authoritative reference guide for researchers working in the Philosophy of Language today.. Reading Philosophy of Language Selected Texts with Interactive Commentary, Jennifer Hornsby, Guy Longworth, 2006, Language Arts & Disciplines, 324 pages. Designed for readers new to the subject, Reading Philosophy of Language presents important writings by leading figures in the field, such as Austin, Chomsky, Davidson, Dummett .... Frege's puzzle , Nathan U. Salmon, 1986, Language Arts & Disciplines, 194 pages. The Uses of Sense Wittgenstein's Philosophy of Language, Charles Travis, 1989, Language Arts & Disciplines, 400 pages. This book provides a novel interpretation of the ideas about language in Ludwig Wittgenstein's Philosophical Investigations. Travis places the "private language argument" in .... Nomination of Edwin M. Stanley Hearing before a subcommittee, Eighty-fifth Congress, second session, on nomination of Edwin M. Stanley, of North Carolina, to be United States District Judge for the Middle District of North Carolina. February 6, 1958, United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary, 1958, , 8 pages. The late 20th century saw great movement in the philosophy of language, often critical of the fathers of the subject--Gottlieb Frege and Bertrand Russell--but sometimes supportive of (or even defensive about) the work of the fathers. Howard Wettstein's sympathies lie with the critics. But he says that they have often misconceived their critical project, treating it in ways that are technically focused and that miss the deeper implications of their revolutionary challenge. Wettstein argues that Wittgenstein--a figure with whom the critics of Frege and Russell are typically unsympathetic--laid the foundation for much of what is really revolutionary in this late 20th century movement. The subject itself should be of great interest, since philosophy of language has functioned as a kind of foundation for much of 20th century philosophy. But in fact it remains a subject for specialists, since the ideas are difficult and the mode of presentation is often fairly technical. In this book, Wettstein brings the non-specialist into the conversation (especially in early chapters); he also reconceives the debate in a way that avoids technical formulation. The Magic Prism is intended for professional philosophers, graduate students, and upper division undergraduates. "Wettstein proposes to dissolve these puzzles by showing that our capacity to talk about things is ultimately mundane and bereft of mystery. His book is thus a unique attempt to combine a sophisticated historical and substantive discussion of reference with a loosely speaking Wittgensteinian perspective on language and Wittgensteinians have much to learn from the result. Wettstein is also one of those increasingly rare mainstream analytic philosophers to speak with a voice which is distinctive without being obtrusive, and to display how even highly récherché debates can profit from the occaisonal input of common sense and wisdom. Wettstein has provided a highly illuminating and thought-provoking anthropology of our practice of using words to refer to things. It provides the perfect antidote to the widespread tendency of distorting this practice because of theoretical fancies and l'art pour l'art technicalitites."--Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews Howard Wettstein's The Magic Prism is an excellent book. Written by an established master in the philosophy of language who has made seminal contributions to the debates he discusses, it is at once eminently readable and philosophically challenging. The book draws its title from Walker Percy, who calls language "the magic prism" through which we come to perceive and know ourselves and our world (p. vii). Building on this idea, Wettstein argues throughout the book that in semantics, we should refrain from beginning with mysterious and inscrutable topics like "soul, mind, ideas, consciousness" and begin instead with language, which is available and undeniable (p. 62). If you want to understand language, don't try to get behind it, explaining it in veiled psychological terms; rather, take it as the starting point and describe the practices that enliven and sustain it. The principal focus in the book is reference, and Wettstein spends most of his time defending the "direct reference revolution" against challenges from the Frege-Russell tradition and from the Kaplan-Perry direct reference apostasy. In the first two chapters, Wettstein supplies a nuanced account of the views on reference developed by the fathers of philosophical semantics, opening the book in a way that is reminiscent of Evans in Varieties of Reference. Chapters 3 and 4 find him adducing a compelling argument for considering the Kaplan-Perry approach to direct reference theory alongside the Frege-Russell tradition as targets for his critique, even given their significant differences. These disparate approaches hold in common a picture of semantic reference that Wettstein calls "Linguistic Cartesianism" (p. 66). Roughly, this view involves commitment to the following theses: (a) reference depends on what is true of individual speakers, and in particular, whether they have a cognitive fix on the referent; (b) the cognitive fix is cashed out in terms of mental and linguistic representations; (c) the contribution of reference to linguistic significance must be understood in propositional terms, and (d) reference is a semantic relation to be explained in more fundamental, cognitive terms involving the contents of propositional attitudes. The balance of the book, beginning with Chapters 4 and 5, presents a Wittgenstein-inspired approach to reference that involves the complete rejection of Linguistic Cartesianism. As Wettstein sees it, reference is a social phenomenon that can succeed even if speakers lack any sort of fix at all on the referent. Further, referring terms function within the social practice of reference as tags, working directly to connect speakers with the world without any representational
Recommended publications
  • 2014 Eastern Division Meeting Program
    The American Philosophical Association EASTERN DIVISION ONE HUNDRED ELEVENTH ANNUAL MEETING PROGRAM PHILADELPHIA MARRIOTT DOWNTOWN PHILADELPHIA, PENNSYLVANIA DECEMBER 27 – 30, 2014 Visit us at APA Eastern for books, journals, and more. INNER EXPERIENCE WHY BE MORAL? Georges Bataille Learning from the Neo-Confucian Translated and with an Introduction by Cheng Brothers Stuart Kendall Yong Huang SACRIFICE IN THE POST- JOHN Dewey’S KANTIAN TRADITION EARLIER LOGICAL THEORY Perspectivism, Intersubjectivity, James Scott Johnston and Recognition Paolo Diego Bubbio EXISTENCE Philosophical Theology, Volume Two THE RETURNS OF ANTIGONE Robert Cummings Neville Interdisciplinary Essays Tina Chanter and Sean D. Kirkland, editors HOW TO ESCAPE Magic, Madness, Beauty, and Cynicism MORE THAN DISCOURSE Crispin Sartwell Symbolic Expressions of Naturalistic Faith ANCIENT AND MEDIEVAL Donald A. Crosby CONCEPTS OF FRIENDSHIP Suzanne Stern-Gillet and A MAN OF LITTLE FAITH Gary M. Gurtler, S.J., editors Michel Deguy With Two Essays by Jean-Luc Nancy GOOD WHITE PEOPLE Translated, edited, and with an The Problem with Middle-Class Introduction by Christopher Elson White Anti-Racism Shannon Sullivan MANIFESTO OF NEW REALISM Maurizio Ferraris EMPLOTTING VIRTUE Translated by Sarah De Sanctis A Narrative Approach to Foreword by Graham Harman Environmental Virtue Ethics Brian Treanor JOURNALS philoSOPHIA THE JOURNAL OF A Journal of Continental Feminism JAPANESE PHILOSOPHY Lynne Huffer and Mayuko Uehara, editor in chief Shannon Winnubst, editors Wing-keung Lam, associate editor Ching-yuen Cheung, Leah Kalmanson, and John W. M. Krummel, assistant editors Curtis Rigsby, book review editor IMPORTANT NOTICES FOR MEETING ATTENDEES SESSION LOCATIONS Please note: the locations of all individual sessions will be included in the paper program that you will receive when you pick up your registration materials at the meeting.
    [Show full text]
  • How to Weaponize a Philosopher: Hobbes' Deadly Arsenal
    Georgia State University ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University Religious Studies Theses Department of Religious Studies Summer 8-15-2013 How to Weaponize a Philosopher: Hobbes' Deadly Arsenal James Webb Georgia State University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/rs_theses Recommended Citation Webb, James, "How to Weaponize a Philosopher: Hobbes' Deadly Arsenal." Thesis, Georgia State University, 2013. https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/rs_theses/40 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of Religious Studies at ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Religious Studies Theses by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. HOW TO WEAPONIZE A PHILOSOPHER: HOBBES’ DEADLY ARSENAL by JAMES WEBB Under the Direction of Timothy Renick ABSTRACT This is a complex argument about the history of transformations in value through the rise of modern liberalism. I argue that there are several contradictions that emerge from these trans- formations. I argue that these contradictions emerge as double effects of liberalism, in tension with the project of liberalism and thriving in spite of it. My data are the theories of Thomas Hobbes and the interpretations of his work. Hobbes is a good datum for the project because he is representative of several of these transformations in value due to the time when and concepts with which he writes. I conclude that these transformations
    [Show full text]
  • A Reading of Shaftesbury's Characteristicks
    Loyola University Chicago Loyola eCommons Dissertations Theses and Dissertations 2010 Sea-Cards for the Impetuous Muse: A Reading of Shaftesbury's Characteristicks Travis Sean Cook Loyola University Chicago Follow this and additional works at: https://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_diss Part of the Political Science Commons Recommended Citation Cook, Travis Sean, "Sea-Cards for the Impetuous Muse: A Reading of Shaftesbury's Characteristicks" (2010). Dissertations. 31. https://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_diss/31 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses and Dissertations at Loyola eCommons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Loyola eCommons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 License. Copyright © 2010 Travis Sean Cook LOYOLA UNIVERSITY CHICAGO SEA-CARDS FOR THE IMPETUOUS MUSE: A READING OF SHAFTESBURY'S CHARACTERISTICKS A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE GRADUATE SCHOOL IN CANDIDACY FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY PROGRAM IN POLITICAL SCIENCE BY TRAVIS SEAN COOK CHICAGO, ILLINOIS MAY 2010 Copyright by Travis S. Cook, 2010 All rights reserved. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I have incurred many debts in the writing of this dissertation--in fact, too many to catalogue accurately. Nevertheless: I have been blessed with many excellent teachers over the years. I am very grateful to the members of my committee for the time, care, insight, and patience they offered as I worked on this project. Professor John Danford has been an excellent teacher and keen reader; I am grateful for the generosity and kindness he has shown to me.
    [Show full text]
  • Locke's "God" Problem: Predicating God and Liberty Amid the Secularizing Effect of "Uneasiness"
    City University of New York (CUNY) CUNY Academic Works All Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects 2-2015 Locke's "God" Problem: Predicating God and Liberty Amid the Secularizing Effect of "Uneasiness" Kathleen M. Ryan Graduate Center, City University of New York How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! More information about this work at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu/gc_etds/616 Discover additional works at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu This work is made publicly available by the City University of New York (CUNY). Contact: [email protected] i Locke’s “God” Problem: Predicating God and Liberty Amid the Secularizing Effect of “Uneasiness” by Kathleen M. Ryan A dissertation submitted to the Graduate Faculty in Philosophy in fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, The City University of New York 2015 ii © 2015 Kathleen M. Ryan All Rights Reserved iii This manuscript has been read and accepted for the Graduate Faculty in Philosophy in satisfaction of the dissertation requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Prof. David M. Rosenthal __________________ ________________________________________________ Date Chair of Examining Committee Prof. John Greenwood __________________ ________________________________________________ Date Executive Officer Supervisory Committee Prof. Bernard Baumrin Prof. Joseph Dauben Prof. Peter Phillips Simpson Prof. Catherine Wilson THE CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK iv Abstract Locke’s “God” Problem: Predicating God and Liberty Amid the Secularizing Effect of “Uneasiness” by Kathleen M. Ryan Advisor: Professor Bernard Baumrin Notorious among philosophy texts, Locke’s Essay stands between the God-intoxicated 17th century and the science-intoxicated 18th century and has had a significant role in the transition of the one intoxication to the other.
    [Show full text]
  • Between Empiricism and Platonism: the Concept of Reason in Locke's
    Between Empiricism and Platonism: The Concept of Reason in Locke’s Philosophy Elisabeth Thorsson PhD University of York Philosophy September 2016 Abstract Locke has long been read in the light of the ideas of Hobbes, that is, as a materialist philosopher, endorsing a conventional view of morality. Hobbes does this through an instrumentalist interpretation of the human reason and Epicurean naturalism (i.e. the hypothesis that everything is made of atoms). Even though Locke’s writings are replete with expressions of his Christian thought, scholars have suggested that Locke is committed to an empirical stance underwritten by these ultimately Epicurean commitments. There is, therefore, a tension in Locke’s philosophy between three divergent thought complexes: his empiricism, his commitment to Christianity, and what seems to be a form of scepticism. This tension poses an interpretative problem, especially concerning Locke’s claims about morality and theology, and the sincerity of his commitment to God. The Hobbist interpretation of Locke has gained ground in recent years, and as a result, Locke’s religious philosophy has been criticised for being either irrelevant or inconsistent. The purpose of this thesis is to engage in and refute that line of criticism by demonstrating that it is possible to give an alternative and richer account of Locke’s intellectual background. By focusing on Locke’s conception of reason, I trace new sources through an overlooked history of ideas from the ancient Platonic tradition, the Stoics, and the Jewish Neo-Platonist philosopher Philo of Alexandria, to the so-called Cambridge Platonists. In particular, I reinterpret Locke’s definition of reason in the light of the Platonist tradition, as containing certain metaphysical and universal traits that are inherently Platonist, and not as something instrumental.
    [Show full text]
  • In Praise of Partisanship
    A SPECULATIVE THEORY OF POLITICS LOGIC OF THE PARTY-FORM A Dissertation SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA BY Sergio Valverde IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Dr. Raymond Duvall, Dr. Antonio Vázquez-Arroyo March 2017 Copyright 2017 Sergio Valverde All rights reserved Table of Contents Chapter 1: Partisanship and Political Reason ……………………….4 Chapter 2: Crushing the Party……………………….………………39 Chapter 3: The Speculative Experience……………………………..63 Chapter 4: The Speculative Value-Form ……………………..……..88 Chapter 5: Crashing the Party…………………………………….…124 Bibliography…………………………………………………………166 i Introduction The US presidential elections of 2016 proved for some the limited possibilities of a two- party oligarchic system and the imperative need to represent more diverse political voices in the electorate. However, the crisis of the party system in America is not to be confused as the cause of the decay of the Republic but rather it is the increasing inequality that has been creeping into our political economy since the Reagan Administration that made possible the fatal choice in 2016 between the neoliberal globalism of the Clintons and the fascist populism of the Trumps. Political theory understands parties as professional machines isolated from society. In many senses, party politics takes place independently of social and economic phenomena. This work aims to show how partisanship is a phenomenon already embedded in the dynamic forces and struggles in society, even before the existence of formal parties, and shows the need for another philosophical understanding of partisanship than the dominant framework used thus far. In doing so, I retrace contemporary and ancient philosophical prejudices against parties and partisanship, and demonstrate through a new reading of Hegel and Marx, how a reframing of the philosophical can be compatible with partisan views, surpassing the moralism and idealism that characterize the dominant philosophical view of parties and politics.
    [Show full text]