The Salafi-Jihad As a Religious Ideology

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Salafi-Jihad As a Religious Ideology FEBRUARY 2008 . VOL 1 . ISSUE 3 The Salafi-Jihad as a The Functions of Ideologies Ideology may help create significant Ideologies have several core functions, divides between adherents and non- Religious Ideology of which the first is to raise awareness adherents. According to Christopher to a particular group of people that a Flood, individuals who are especially By Assaf Moghadam certain issue deserves their attention. convinced by an ideology can exhibit Ideologies explain to that “in-group” why “a remarkable ability to ignore, deny, in recent years, a growing number of social, political, or economic conditions or reinterpret information which is analysts and policymakers have referred are as they are. Since individuals often incompatible with tenets of their belief to the doctrines guiding al-Qa`ida and seek explanations in times of crisis, system.”6 Ideologues themselves, its associates as an ideology, and they ideologies are particularly appealing meanwhile, “tend to be explicit in their appear to have influenced the Bush when a group of people perceives itself cognitive claims, exclusionary in their administration into adopting the term as to be in a predicament. The second membership, authoritarian in their well. In an address at the Capital Hilton function is a diagnostic one, whereby leadership, rigorous in their ethical in Washington, D.C. in September the ideology attributes blame for the mandates, and insistent on the rightness 2006, for example, President Bush present predicament of the in-group of their causes.”7 characterized the 9/11 suicide hijackers upon some “out-group.” The out-group as men who “kill in the name of a clear is identified with a certain behavior To the in-group, ideology confers 1 and focused ideology.” In the National that, according to the narrative offered identification with a particular cause, Strategy for Combating Terrorism by the ideology, undermines the well- and thus a sense of purpose. That shared (NSCT) released in the same month, being of the in-group. A third function sense of purpose can form a common the authors described al-Qa`ida’s set of ideology lies in the creation of a group identity among the members, while at of beliefs as “an ideology of oppression, identity. At the same time that the out- the same time heighten opposition and 2 violence, and hate,” as well as “a form group is blamed for the predicament of feelings of separation from individuals of totalitarianism following in the path the in-group, the ideology identifies and who do not share these beliefs. 3 of fascism and Nazism.” highlights the common characteristics of those individuals who adhere to, or are The Salafi-jihad: Religion or Ideology? Although descriptions of the precepts potential adherents of, the ideology. The The Salafi-jihad is more akin to an and beliefs guiding al-Qa`ida and its fourth and final function of ideologies is ideology than to a religion because like associates as ideological in nature a programmatic one. It consists of the other ideologies it is a by-product of the certainly hit the mark, few serious ideology offering a specific program of industrialization that swept through attempts have been made to justify the action said to remedy the in-group of its Europe beginning in the 19th century and use of the term “ideology” in connection predicament and urges its adherents to is hence an outgrowth of modernity. It is with the Salafi-jihad—the guiding implement that course of action.5 intimately linked to the dislocating and doctrine of al-Qa`ida, its affiliates, turbulent effects of globalization, which 4 associates and progeny. This article Ideologies are links between thoughts, introduced rapid changes in the social, will discuss the nature of ideologies and beliefs and myths on the one hand, political and economic realms of life. examine the extent to which the Salafi- and action on the other hand. They Those transformations have challenged jihad can be compared to other ideologies can be instruments of preservation in established and rooted notions of such as fascism or communism. It as far as they can help a given group identity associated with traditional concludes that the Salafi-jihad is best to preserve its political power. More social structures. described as a religious ideology rather commonly, however, ideologies are than a secular ideology such as fascism used as instruments of competition and The Salafi-jihad is an ideology because or National Socialism. The final part conflict, whereby a group can utilize its functions are essentially congruent will explain why a proper labeling of ideology as a means of opposition and with those of other ideologies. Analogous the Salafi-jihad has important policy contestation. Once a group internalizes to the first, explanatory function of implications. the sets of beliefs associated with a ideology, the Salafi-jihadists’ goal is given ideology, that ideology provides to raise awareness among Muslims a “cognitive map” that filters the way that their religion has been on the social realities are perceived, rendering wane. Whereas Islam used to be at its 1 “President Discusses Global War on Terror,” Septem- that reality easier to grasp, more peak during the first centuries of its ber 5, 2006, available at www.whitehouse.gov/news/ coherent, and thus more meaningful. It existence, Salafi-jihadists urge Muslims releases/2006/09/20060905-4.html. is for that reason that ideologies offer to understand that the tide has turned, 2 National Strategy for Combating Terrorism, Septem- some measure of security and relief in and that Islam is in a constant state of ber 2006, p. 5, available at www.whitehouse.gov/nsc/ the face of ambiguity—particularly in decline in religious, political, military, nsct/2006/nsct2006.pdf. times of crisis. economic and cultural terms. 3 Ibid., p. 11. 4 For the purposes of this article, the terms Salafi-jihad, Salafi-jihadists and Salafi-jihadist refer to the core doc- 6 Christopher G. Flood, Political Myth: A Theoretical In- trines and beliefs of al-Qa`ida and its associated move- 5 A similar categorization of the functions of ideology is troduction (New York and London: Garland, 1996), p. 20. ments—i.e., its ideology. It does not refer to the larger used in Terence Ball and Richard Dagger, Political Ide- 7 Bruce B. Lawrence, Defenders of God: The Fundamental- social movement comprised of al-Qa`ida and its associ- ologies and the Democratic Ideal, 3rd ed. (New York: Long- ist Revolt against the Modern Age (Columbia, SC: Univer- ates. man, 1999). sity of South Carolina Press, 1995), p. 77. FEBRUARY 2008 . VOL 1 . ISSUE 3 Secondly, and analogous with the Like leaders of other ideologies, on the part of the individual member. diagnostic function of modern Usama bin Ladin and leading figures Ideologies, like religions, demand verbal ideologies, the Salafi-jihad identifies the of Salafi-jihadist groups ignore, assent from their members, but more alleged source of Islam’s conundrum in deny, or reinterpret information that than religions ideologies also demand the persistent attacks and humiliation of counters or could potentially weaken complete control over the thoughts, Muslims on the part of an anti-Islamic their argument. For instance, Salafi- words and deeds of their adherents.12 alliance of what it terms “Crusaders,” jihadists ignored Western support to This characteristic also applies to al- “Zionists” and “apostates.” Muslim Indonesia in the aftermath of Qa`ida and like-minded groups, who the 2004 tsunami. They interpret their have prominently adopted an approach The third function of the Salafi-jihad violence on other Muslims as religiously of “you are either with us or against also parallels that of other ideologies, sanctioned, ignoring sections of Muslim us.” namely its attempt at creating a new holy texts that prohibit internecine identity for its adherents. Several fighting or the killing of civilians. Second, religions tend to support scholars have argued that Muslims They single-handedly blame the West existing orders, while ideologies tend and Western converts adopting Salafi- for each and every misfortune that has to confront them. “Ideologies are not jihadist tenets suffer from a crisis of befallen Muslims. merely world-reflecting but world- identity.8 To those who are disoriented constituting,” wrote Lawrence. “They by modernity, the Salafi-jihad provides As an ideology, the Salafi-jihad has much tend to have a ‘missionary’ zeal to show a new sense of self-definition and in common with radical leftist ideologies others what they need to do, to correct belonging in the form of membership to of 20th century Europe. Like the radical and help them to that end.”13 Thus, a supranational entity. Salafi-jihadists left, the Salafi-jihad describes its action unlike religious leaders, Bin Ladin goes attempt to instill into Muslims the notion in part as a revolt against injustice, and beyond merely disagreeing with those that the only identity that truly matters it rejects bourgeois values, imperialism who do not share his beliefs—he battles is that of membership in the umma, the and materialism. The goal of both the them. global Islamic community that bestows leftist movements and Salafi-jihadists comfort, dignity, security and honor is essentially an elusive quest to help Yet, while the Salafi-jihad is distinct upon the downtrodden Muslims. bring about a more just society— from Islam due to the former’s ideological violence is seen as a justified means nature, it also differs from ordinary Finally, like all ideologies, Salafi- to an end. Both Salafi-jihadists and ideologies in an important respect—it jihadists present a program of action, radical leftist revolutionaries believe tends to use religious words, symbols namely jihad, which is understood that the scope of their activities and the and values to sustain itself and grow.
Recommended publications
  • Sunni – Shi`A Relations and the Implications for Belgium and Europe
    FEARING A ‘SHIITE OCTOPUS’ SUNNI – SHI`A RELATIONS AND THE IMPLICATIONS FOR BELGIUM AND EUROPE EGMONT PAPER 35 FEARING A ‘SHIITE OCTOPUS’ Sunni – Shi`a relations and the implications for Belgium and Europe JELLE PUELINGS January 2010 The Egmont Papers are published by Academia Press for Egmont – The Royal Institute for International Relations. Founded in 1947 by eminent Belgian political leaders, Egmont is an independent think-tank based in Brussels. Its interdisciplinary research is conducted in a spirit of total academic freedom. A platform of quality information, a forum for debate and analysis, a melting pot of ideas in the field of international politics, Egmont’s ambition – through its publications, seminars and recommendations – is to make a useful contribution to the decision- making process. *** President: Viscount Etienne DAVIGNON Director-General: Marc TRENTESEAU Series Editor: Prof. Dr. Sven BISCOP *** Egmont - The Royal Institute for International Relations Address Naamsestraat / Rue de Namur 69, 1000 Brussels, Belgium Phone 00-32-(0)2.223.41.14 Fax 00-32-(0)2.223.41.16 E-mail [email protected] Website: www.egmontinstitute.be © Academia Press Eekhout 2 9000 Gent Tel. 09/233 80 88 Fax 09/233 14 09 [email protected] www.academiapress.be J. Story-Scientia NV Wetenschappelijke Boekhandel Sint-Kwintensberg 87 B-9000 Gent Tel. 09/225 57 57 Fax 09/233 14 09 [email protected] www.story.be All authors write in a personal capacity. Lay-out: proxess.be ISBN 978 90 382 1538 9 D/2010/4804/17 U 1384 NUR1 754 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise without the permission of the publishers.
    [Show full text]
  • Violent Jihad in the Netherlands
    Violent Jihad in the Netherlands Current trends in the Islamist terrorist threat Violent Jihad in the Netherlands Current trends in the Islamist terrorist threat 2 Contents Foreword 5 Introduction 7 The murder of Theo van Gogh: consequences and effects 7 General trends in the development of jihadism 9 Framework of terms and definitions 10 1 From exogenous threat to home-grown terrorism 13 1.1 What is a jihadist network? 13 1.2 Historical development of network formation 15 1.2.1 The traditional phase: migration of jihadists 15 1.2.2 The proliferation phase: recruitment 16 1.2.3 The ‘home-grown’ phase: radicalisation and jihadisation 17 1.3 Three types of jihadist networks 17 2 Decentralisation and local implantation of international jihad19 2.1Al-Qaeda: from ‘network of gynetworks’ 19 to trademark and ideolo 2.2 Ideology of global violent jihad 21 2.3 Decentralisation of international jihad 22 2.4 Local implantation of international jihad 26 3 Radicalisation and the emergence of local networks 29 3.1Radicalisation, recruitment and jihadisation 29 3.2 The religious context of radicalisation 30 3.3 The socio-political context of radicalisation 33 3.4 The cultural and socio-psychological context of radicalisation 35 3.5 Emergence of local autonomous cells and networks 37 3.6 Backgrounds and functioning of local autonomous networks 38 3.7 The significance of the Hofstad network 39 4 Virtualisation of jihad 43 4.1The Internet as a propulsion of the jihad movement 43 4.2 Al-Qaeda as a virtual database (top-down) 44 4.3 The virtual umma (grass
    [Show full text]
  • Women in Islamic State: from Caliphate to Camps
    ICCT Policy Brief October 2019 DOI: 10.19165/2019.03.9 ISSN: 2468-0656 Women in Islamic State: From Caliphate to Camps Author: Gina Vale Within the territorial boundaries of the Islamic State’s (IS) ‘caliphate’, women were largely confined to the domestic sphere. Their roles centred on support to militant husbands and the ideological upbringing of children. The physical collapse of IS’ proto-state marks a significant turning point in women’s commitment and activism for the group. Many IS-affiliated women are now indefinitely detained within Kurdish-run camps in North-eastern Syria. The harsh living conditions therein have fostered ideological divides. While some show signs of disillusionment with IS’ ‘caliphate’ dream, others have sought to re-impose its strictures. This paper contributes to the understanding of women’s roles across the lifespan of the Islamic State, and the efficacy of independent female activism to facilitate the group’s physical recovery. It argues that IS’ post-territorial phase has brought greater autonomy and ideological authority to individual hard-line detainees. However, beyond the camps, women’s influence and ability to realise IS’ physical resurgence remains practically limited and dependent on male leadership. Keywords: Islamic State, al-Hol, Women, Gender, Propaganda, Children, Indoctrination Women in Islamic State: From Caliphate to Camps Introduction The loss of Baghouz in March 2019 marked the long-awaited territorial collapse of Islamic State’s (IS, or ISIS) ‘caliphate’.1 As a result, Kurdish forces in Syria captured thousands of its remaining fighters and supporters, with many occupying camps such as al-Hol.2 Though once effective to initially detain and process IS-affiliated persons, the population of such camps now far exceeds maximum capacity.
    [Show full text]
  • The Concept of Jihad in Islam
    IOSR Journal Of Humanities And Social Science (IOSR-JHSS) Volume 21, Issue 9, Ver. 7 (Sep. 2016) PP 35-42 e-ISSN: 2279-0837, p-ISSN: 2279-0845. www.iosrjournals.org The Concept of Jihad In Islam Ramlan TengkuErwinsyahbana Nurul Hakim Abstract.:-It is an undisputable fact that jihad is an Islamic teaching that is explicitly mentioned in Quran, Hadith, ijma'as well as various fiqh literature from classical time to the contemporary time. Jihad term often used for things that are destructive by western scholars and society. For them, jihad is synonymous with terrorism. The similarization of the word Jihad with the word terrorism in the Western perception is strongly reinforced by a series of terror committed by Muslims in the name of jihad. These acts have been increasingly affecting the interpretation of the word jihad in a negative way although in reality that is not the case in a contemporary context. Jihad in contemporary understanding is not just a war against visible enemies but also a war against the devil and carnality. Even a war against visible enemies that are written in classical fiqh books has now replaced by a contemporary interpretation of jihad against the enemies, as was done by Dr. ZakirNaik. KEYWORDS:Concept, Jihad and Islam I. INTRODUCTION When the 9/11 attack hit the United States more than a decade ago, the term jihad became a trending topic worldwide. The US and other Western countries in general claim that the perpetrators of the 9/11 attack were following the doctrine of Jihad in Islam in order to fight against America and its allies around the world.
    [Show full text]
  • Justifying Relations with an Apostate During a Jihād a Salafi-Jihādist Group’S Relations with Turkey in Syria
    JUSTIFYING RELATIONS WITH AN APOSTATE DURING A JIHĀD A SALAFI-JIHĀDIST GROUP’S RELATIONS WITH TURKEY IN SYRIA BAILEY ULBRICHT MARCH 2019 POLICY PAPER 2019-6 CONTENTS * SUMMARY * 1 INTRODUCTION * 3 DEFINITIONS * 4 THE CREED AND PRINCIPLES OF HTS * 6 THE CASE OF TURKEY * 13 CONCLUSION * 14 U.S. POLICY IMPLICATIONS © The Middle East Institute The Middle East Institute 1319 18th Street NW Washington, D.C. 20036 SUMMARY Several months after formally breaking with al-Qaeda in January 2017, the Salafi-Jihadist group Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS) deviated significantly from its prior methodology when it gave the Turkish Army access to portions of territory it controlled in Syria. Though HTS was careful to avoid direct military collaboration with Turkey, it welcomed the Turkish Army’s presence as an additional force against the Syrian regime and secular opposition groups. This caused a significant rift among the group’s supporters and the al-Qaeda community, who accused HTS of thwarting its own jihād by forming relations with Turkey, considered by Salafi-Jihadists to be an apostate. This analysis aims to explain how HTS has legally justified its relations with Turkey. After outlining key legal terms and the group’s creed, I argue that under the doctrine of loyalty and disavowal and the doctrine of necessity, HTS is in fact able to legally justify relations with an apostate during jihād. However in doing so, the group is unable to reconcile its own methodological deviance, in which forgoing doctrinal purity for military pragmatism appears to be undermining the objective of its own jihād.
    [Show full text]
  • Islamic Law, Jihad and Violence
    UCLA UCLA Journal of Islamic and Near Eastern Law Title Islamic Law, Jihad and Violence Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/1sj0m31p Journal UCLA Journal of Islamic and Near Eastern Law, 16(1) Author Abou El Fadl, Khaled Publication Date 2017 DOI 10.5070/N4161038734 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California ISLAMIC LAW, JIHAD AND VIOLENCE Khaled Abou El Fadl TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ��������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������1 I. MORAL OBLIGATION AND LEGAL INDETERMINACY IN THE ISLAMIC JURISTIC TRADITION ..........................................................................................................5 II. THE MEANING OF JIHAD ......................................................................................9 A. Peace as a Moral Imperative ................................................................10 B. The Qur’anic Discourse on Jihad ........................................................12 C. The Challenge of War and the Balancing of Moral Imperatives ..........13 III� JUS AD BELLUM IN THE ISLAMIC TRADITION���������������������������������������������������������15 IV� JUS IN BELLO IN THE ISLAMIC TRADITION.............................................................20 INTRODUCTION To what extent are justifications of violence in Islamic law based on scriptural prescriptions and commands? The challenge of answering this question, in part, is the sheer breadth of the Islamic experience.
    [Show full text]
  • Anti-Shia Hostility in Malaysia
    ISSUE: 2021 No. 81 ISSN 2335-6677 RESEARCHERS AT ISEAS – YUSOF ISHAK INSTITUTE ANALYSE CURRENT EVENTS Singapore | 16 June 2021 Rethinking Extremism Beyond Physical Violence: Anti-Shia Hostility in Malaysia Norshahril Saat, Nur Syafiqah Mohd Taufek, and Afra Alatas* Malaysia has been referred to as a “moderate” Muslim country for a long time. However, it is now no longer a stranger to religious extremism. In this picture, Muslim devotees exercise social distancing, as a preventive measure to combat the spread of the Covid-19 coronavirus, on the first Friday of the holy month of Ramadan at the Putra Mosque in Putrajaya on April 16, 2021. Photo: Mohd RASFAN / AFP. *Norshahril Saat is Senior Fellow and Coordinator of the Regional Social and Cultural Studies Programme at ISEAS – Yusof Ishak Institute. Nur Syafiqah and Afra Alatas are research officers under the same programme at the Institute. 1 ISSUE: 2021 No. 81 ISSN 2335-6677 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY • Academic studies on extremism have tended to view the issue through a security lens. Recent attacks on churches in Indonesia and Malaysia would have reinforced the popularity of this approach. • However, violent extremism does not exist in a vacuum. Acts of terror are driven by ideas and discourse that motivate and justify terrorist acts. • This article examines the impact of non-physically violent extremism on Muslims. Drawing on the case of the Shi’as in Malaysia, it explores how extreme ideas are espoused by some people in power, including popular preachers, religious elites, and bureaucrats. • It analyses the Malaysian experience and demonstrates how labels such as “deviant” or “liberal” can lead to distress among Muslims advocating different points of view and inhibit their constructive participation in society at large.
    [Show full text]
  • Political Islam and the New Global Economy
    CR5-1 05 05/02/05 11:44 AM Page 111 Political Islam and the New Global Economy The Political Economy of an Egyptian Social Movement J OEL B EININ Stanford University, Stanford, California Since September 11th, 2001, much ink has been spilled dis- cussing “Islamic fundamentalism” or, ostensibly more authoritatively but not necessarily more precisely, “Wahhabism” and its threat to U.S. national security and Western civilization. The armed radicals of al-Qa‘ida and sim- ilar groups, while they have received the lion’s share of public attention, are only one relatively small component of a broad movement of political Islam that has emerged since the mid-1970s. Proponents of “political Islam” or “Islamists” or “Islamic activists”—I use these terms interchangeably—are Muslims who do not necessarily accept received understandings of the Islamic tradition as the ultimate determinants of contemporary Muslim identity and practice. Rather, they self-consciously seek to refashion that tradition in response to the challenges—however defined—faced by their community and to mobilize Muslim sentiment and identity in support of their vision of a proper Islamic society (White 2002, 23; Wiktorowicz 2004b, 3). Even if that vision is presented as a return to an ideal past, it addresses modern political, economic, and cultural problems. The term “fundamentalism” is inadequate to describe this phenomenon because it ● 111 CR5-1 05 05/02/05 11:44 AM Page 112 112 ● Political Islam and the New Global Economy suggests a Protestant literalist reading of the Bible that has no analog in Islam and because it implies a backward-looking rather than a modern social movement.
    [Show full text]
  • SALAFISM in AMERICA History, Evolution, Radicalization
    SALAFISM in AMERICA History, Evolution, Radicalization ALEXANDER MELEAGROU-HITCHENS October 2018 Table of Contents Acknowledgements .................................................................................................................... ii Glossary of Terms ..................................................................................................................... iii Executive Summary .................................................................................................................... 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 4 I. Understanding Salafism ....................................................................................................... 6 I.I What is Salafism? .............................................................................................................. 6 I.II Categorizing Salafism ..................................................................................................... 9 Quietists ................................................................................................................................... 9 Activists .................................................................................................................................. 11 Jihadis .................................................................................................................................... 14 I.III Salafism and Extremism ............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Concept of Jihad in Islamic International Law
    Journal of Conflict & Security Law (2005), Vol. 10 No. 3, 321–343 doi:10.1093/jcsl/kri017 Advance Access published on September 06, 2005 THE CONCEPT OF JIHAD IN ISLAMIC INTERNATIONAL LAW Shaheen Sardar Ali* and Javaid Rehman** ABSTRACT In the post 11 September 2001 legal and political environment, Islam appears to have become one of the most misunderstood religions. Islam has been equated with fanati- cism, intolerance, violence and wars of aggression – the classical Jihad ideology is often deployed to cast doubts on the compatibility of Islam with modern norms of international law as enunciated in the United Nations Charter. Much confusion stems from the fact that Islamic international law and Islamic laws of armed conflict have not received due attention in western legal scholarship. The concept of Jihad has argu- ably been central to many modern conflicts including that of resistance to US occupa- tion of Iraq (2003–2005), the struggle for self-determination in Kashmir (1947–2005) and the Palestinian struggle for reclaiming their land from Israel (1948–2005). This article seeks to provide a jurisprudential analysis of the concept of Jihad. Amidst controversies surrounding Jihad, the authors attempt to contextualise the con- cept and relate the discussion to contemporary norms of International law as estab- lished by the United Nations Charter. The authors identify the conditions under which Jihad is permissible in Islamic law in the light of its various sources. The distinction between dar-al-harb (abode of war) and dar-al-Islam (abode of Islam) is presented as this issue impacts on laws of war in Islam.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding Jihad and Jihadism
    At a glance May 2015 Understanding jihad and jihadism Since the rise of al Qaeda and, most recently, ISIL/Da'esh, the term jihad has become a ubiquitous part of public discourse on terrorism and radical Islam. Although jihad does not constitute one of the 'Five Pillars' of Muslim faith, many consider it to be a duty of the Muslim community as a whole. It is therefore important to understand the origins of the term as well as its religious and political evolution: from jihad (different kinds of religiously inspired efforts) to jihadism (a modern ideology). Origins and understandings of jihad While often equated with 'holy war', jihad generally means a religiously inspired 'effort' or 'struggle' towards a goal of a spiritual, personal, political or military nature. Islamic tradition distinguishes between 'lesser jihad', understood as just warfare for the sake of Islam and its adherents, and 'greater jihad', referring to the struggle to improve one's own character. Gradually, as a consequence of occasional (or, according to other scholars, frequent) use of the term in the context of warfare, the understanding of jihad as a religiously sanctioned armed struggle has become the most prominent interpretation among both Muslims and non- Muslims. The definition of legitimate goals and conduct during jihad, and the authority required to invoke it, have been contested. In a variety of historical contexts, the invocation of jihad has served as a vehicle to defend Muslim lives and belongings against aggressors, including during the Crusades and the anti-colonial struggle. It has also been referred to in order to widen the influence of Islam through conquest.
    [Show full text]
  • Jihad and the Islamic Law of War
    JIHAD AND THE ISLAMIC LAW OF WAR the royal aal al-bayt institute for islamic thought 2009 • jordan JIHAD AND THE ISLAMIC LAW OF WAR the royal aal al-bayt institute for islamic thought 2009 • jordan contents Overview v 1. Does jihad mean “holy war”? 1 2. What is the role of non-violent jihad ? 4 3. Do Muslims go to war against others merely because they are non-Muslim? 9 4. What are the Five Basic Rights of Islamic law, and how do they relate to war? 11 5. What does the Qur’an say about jihad and fighting? 13 6. When do Muslims make treaties? 16 7. What is the distinction between pre-emption and aggression? 21 8. What is the difference between “TheAbode of Islam” and “TheAbode ofWar”? 24 9. Is forced conversion an Islamic teaching? 27 10. What is the “sword verse”? 31 contents 11. What are the basic rules of combat as laid down in Islam’s authoritative texts? 35 12. What is the status of non-Muslims under Islamic rule? 37 13. What is the jizyah , or poll-tax, on non-Muslims? 43 14. Does orthodox Islam sanction rebellion against political authority? 47 15. How does the Islamic law of war come to be violated? 53 Conclusion 64 Further Reading 69 Notes 71 overview what is the Islamic law of war and peace? This crucial question underlies all discussion of jihad , perhaps the most misrepresented of ideas in the West’s understanding of Islam. “Holy war”, 1 “a faith spread by the sword”, 2 “Islamo- fascism”, 3 “infidel”, 4 andmanyoftheothercatchphrasesso popular in the uninformed debate on this topic only serve to muddle the issue.
    [Show full text]