DOCSLIB.ORG

Units (V.1.6.0)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Units (V.1.6.0) Units (v.1.6.0) Andrea Dal Corso (SISSA - Trieste) 1 Contents 1 Introduction 4 2 People 5 3 Overview 6 4 Time 8 5 Length 9 6 Mass 10 7 Mass density 11 8 Frequency 12 9 Speed 13 10 Acceleration 14 11 Momentum 15 12 Angular momentum 16 13 Force 17 14 Energy 18 15 Power 19 16 Pressure 20 17 Temperature 21 18 Current 22 19 Charge 24 20 Charge density 26 21 Current density 27 22 Electric field 28 23 Electric potential 29 24 Capacitance 30 25 Vacuum electric permittivity 31 2 26 Electric dipole moment 32 27 Polarization 33 28 Electric displacement 34 29 Resistance 36 30 Magnetic flux density 37 31 Vector potential 39 32 Magnetic field flux 40 33 Inductance 41 34 Magnetic dipole moment 42 35 Magnetization 43 36 Vacuum magnetic permeability 44 37 Magnetic field strength 45 38 Microscopic Maxwell’s equations 48 39 Macroscopic Maxwell’s equations 49 40 The Schrödinger equation 50 41 Appendix A: Rydberg atomic units 51 42 Appendix B: Gaussian atomic units 55 43 Appendix C: Magnetization Intensity 57 44 Appendix D: Conversion factors tables 57 45 Bibliography 65 3 1 Introduction These notes discuss the atomic units (a.u.) used in electronic structure codes. They are updated with the recent (year 2019) changes to the international system (SI). The conversion factors written here should be those implemented in the QUANTUM ESPRESSO and thermo_pw codes. These notes are part of the thermo_pw package. The complete package is available at https://github.com/dalcorso/thermo_pw. 4 2 People These notes have been written by Andrea Dal Corso (SISSA - Trieste). Disclaimer: I am not an expert of units. These notes reflect what I think about units. If you think that some formula is wrong, that I misunderstood some- thing, or that something can be calculated more simply, please let me know, I would like to learn more. You can contact me directly: [email protected]. 5 3 Overview Electronic structure codes use atomic units (a.u.). In these notes we explain how to obtain the conversion factors from a.u. to the international system (SI) units and viceversa. The most relevant physical formulas are written both in SI units and in a.u.. Moreover, since several books and old literature still use the c.g.s. (centimeter-gram-second) system we discuss also how to convert from a.u. to c.g.s.-Gaussian units and viceversa. These notes are organized in Sections, one for each physical quantity. For each quantity we give its definition in the SI system and then we derive the conversion factor from the a.u. to the SI unit, the conversion factor from the c.g.s-Gaussian unit to the SI unit, and the conversion factor from the a.u. to the c.g.s-Gaussian unit. The text in each Section depends on the defini- tions given in previous Sections. Only in a few cases it depends on definitions given in following Sections and in these cases we mention explicitly where to find the required definition. Important physical formulas are introduced when we have given sufficient information to convert the formula in different sys- tems. Microscopic and macroscopic Maxwell’s equations are also summarized in separate Sections. Each system has a different color. In black the SI, in blue the a.u., in orange the c.g.s.-Gaussian system, and in green the conversion factors from a.u. to the c.g.s.-Gaussian units. Comments of interest not belonging to any sys- tem in particular are given in red. We indicate the numerical value of a given quantity in the SI with a tilde. The units in a.u. are indicated with a bar, while the units in the c.g.s.-Gaussian system are indicated with a bar and the subscript cgs. When the c.g.s.-Gaussian unit has an accepted name we use it interchangeably with the generic name. Only Hartree a.u. are described in the main text since these are the most common microscopic units. QUANTUM ESPRESSO uses Rydberg a.u. that can be easily derived from the Hartree a.u.. We describe Rydberg a.u. in Appendix A (in violet). In the ab − initio literature modified a.u. have been introduced in which the electromagnetic equations look like those of the c.g.s-Gaussian system. This requires some modifications to the definitions given in the main text and we discuss these units in Appendix B (in steelblue). It is useful to recall a few preliminary facts needed in the rest of these notes. A few experimental quantities have fixed values in the SI. Among these: The Planck constant h = 6:62607015 × 10−34 J · s; (1) the speed of light c = 2:99792458 × 108 m=s; (2) and the electron charge e = 1:602176634 × 10−19 C: (3) Two experimental quantities are known with high accuracy: The Rydberg constant, measured spectroscopically from the frequencies of 6 Hydrogen and Deuterium absorption and emission lines: 7 R1 = 1:0973731568160 × 10 1=m (4) is known with a relative error of 1:9 × 10−12 and the fine structure constant, measured from the anomaly of the electron magnetic moment, α = 7:2973525693 × 10−3; (5) is known with a relative error of 1:6 × 10−10. The Rydberg constant can be written in terms of the fine structure constant α and the electron mass me or in terms of α and of the Bohr radius aB: 2 α mec α R1 = = : (6) 2h 4πaB Using these equations we can calculate the electron mass as: 2hR m = 1 = 9:1093837015 × 10−31 kg (7) e α2c and aB as: α −11 aB = = 5:29177210903 × 10 m: (8) 4πR1 α is a pure number equal to: e2 µ ce2 α = = 0 ; (9) 4π0hc¯ 2h where h¯ = h=2π, 0 the vacuum electric permittivity and µ0 is the vacuum magnetic permeability. Hence the Bohr radius can be rewritten as: 2 h¯ h¯ 4π0 aB = = 2 : (10) αmec mee Eq. 9 allows the calculation of µ0 as: 2hα N µ = = 1:25663706212 × 10−6 : (11) 0 e2c A2 0 is obtained from the relation: 2 1 −12 C 0 = 2 = 8:8541878128 × 10 2 : (12) µ0c N · m It is also useful to define the hartree energy: 2 e −18 Eh = = 2hcR1 = 4:3597447222072 × 10 J; (13) 4π0aB and the Bohr magneton: he¯ −24 µB = = 9:2740100783 × 10 J=T: (14) 2me 7 4 Time In the SI, the unit of time is the second (symbol s), defined requiring that the frequency of a particular line of the 133Cs atom is exactly 9192631770 s−1. In a.u. the unit of time (symbol ¯t) is defined requiring that the numerical value of h¯ is 1. The conversion factor with the SI unit is obtained recalling that in the SI the Planck constant is h¯ = h¯~ J · s = h¯~ kg · m2=s. Therefore in a.u. we have: ¯m ·¯l2 h¯ = ; (15) ¯t ¯ ¯ where l is the unit of length and ¯m the unit of mass. As we discuss below l = aB and ¯m= me, therefore m a2 h¯4π a h¯ 1:0545718176462 × 10−34 J · s ¯ e B 0 B −17 t = = 2 = = −18 = 2:4188843265857×10 s h¯ e Eh 4:3597447222072 × 10 J (16) In the c.g.s. system the unit of time is the second (symbol s), defined as in the SI. We have ¯tcgs = s. The conversion factor between the a.u. and the c.g.s. unit is: ¯t = 2:4188843265857× 10−17 s. 8 5 Length In the SI, the unit of length is the metre (symbol m) defined as the length of the path traveled by light during the time interval of 1=299792458 s. In a.u. the unit of the length (symbol ¯l) is defined requiring that the Bohr ra- ¯ ¯ −11 dius aB = l. The conversion factor with the SI unit is l = 5:29177210903×10 m. In the c.g.s. system the unit of length is the centimetre (symbol cm) defined −2 ¯ −2 as cm = 1:0 × 10 m. We have lcgs = 10 m. The conversion factor between the a.u. and the c.g.s. unit is: ¯l = 5:29177210903× 10−9 cm. A common unit of length is the angstrom (symbol Å). We have Å= 10−10 m. 9 6 Mass In the SI the unit of mass is the kilogram (symbol kg) defined requiring that the Planck constant h has the value 6:62607015 × 10−34 kg · m2=s. In a.u. the unit of mass (symbol ¯m) is defined requiring that the mass of the electron me = ¯m. The conversion factor with the SI unit is ¯m= 9:1093837015 × 10−31 kg. In the c.g.s. system the unit of mass is the gram (symbol g) defined as g = 1:0 × 10−3 kg. The conversion factor between the a.u. and the c.g.s. unit is ¯m= 9:1093837015× 10−28 g. Atomic weights are usually expressed in atomic mass units (a:m:u: = 1:66053906660 × 10−27 kg). This quantity can be converted in a.u. as: 1:66053906660 × 10−27 kg a:m:u: = ¯m= 1:8228884862 × 103 ¯m (17) 9:1093837015 × 10−31 kg 10 7 Mass density In the SI the unit of mass density is derived from its definition: dm ρ = ; (18) m dV and it is kg=m3. In a.u. the unit of mass density (symbol ρ¯m) is derived from its definition: ¯m ρ¯m = ¯l3 .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Summer 2018 Astron 9 Week 2 FINAL
    ORDER OF MAGNITUDE PHYSICS RICHARD ANANTUA, JEFFREY FUNG AND JING LUAN WEEK 2: FUNDAMENTAL INTERACTIONS, NUCLEAR AND ATOMIC PHYSICS REVIEW OF BASICS • Units • Systems include SI and cgs • Dimensional analysis must confirm units on both sides of an equation match • BUCKINGHAM’S PI THEOREM - For a physical equation involving N variables, if there are R independent dimensions, then there are N-R independent dimensionless groups, denoted Π", …, Π%&'. UNITS REVIEW – BASE UNITS • Physical quantities may be expressed using several choices of units • Unit systems express physical quantities in terms of base units or combinations thereof Quantity SI (mks) Gaussian (cgs) Imperial Length Meter (m) Centimeter (cm) Foot (ft) Mass Kilogram (kg) Gram (g) Pound (lb) Time Second (s) Second (s) Second (s) Temperature Kelvin (K) Kelvin (K)* Farenheit (ºF) Luminous intensity Candela (cd) Candela (cd)* Amount Mole (mol) Mole (mol)* Current Ampere (A) * Sometimes not considered a base cgs unit REVIEW – DERIVED UNITS • Units may be derived from others Quantity SI cgs Momentum kg m s-1 g cm s-1 Force Newton N=kg m s-2 dyne dyn=g cm s-2 Energy Joule J=kg m2 s-2 erg=g cm2 s-2 Power Watt J=kg m2 s-3 erg/s=g cm2 s-3 Pressure Pascal Pa=kg m-1 s-2 barye Ba=g cm-1 s-2 • Some unit systems differ in which units are considered fundamental Electrostatic Units SI (mks) Gaussian cgs Charge A s (cm3 g s-2)1/2 Current A (cm3 g s-4)1/2 REVIEW – UNITS • The cgs system for electrostatics is based on the assumptions kE=1, kM =2kE/c2 • EXERCISE: Given the Gaussian cgs unit of force is g cm s-2, what is the electrostatic unit of charge? # 2 ! = ⟹ # = ! & 2 )/+ = g cm/ s1+ )/+ [&]2 REVIEW – BUCKINGHAM’S PI THEOREM • BUCKINGHAM’S PI THEOREM - For a physical equation involving N variables, if there are R independent dimensions, then there are N-R independent dimensionless groups, denoted Π", …, Π%&'.
    [Show full text]
  • Magnetism, Magnetic Properties, Magnetochemistry
    Magnetism, Magnetic Properties, Magnetochemistry 1 Magnetism All matter is electronic Positive/negative charges - bound by Coulombic forces Result of electric field E between charges, electric dipole Electric and magnetic fields = the electromagnetic interaction (Oersted, Maxwell) Electric field = electric +/ charges, electric dipole Magnetic field ??No source?? No magnetic charges, N-S No magnetic monopole Magnetic field = motion of electric charges (electric current, atomic motions) Magnetic dipole – magnetic moment = i A [A m2] 2 Electromagnetic Fields 3 Magnetism Magnetic field = motion of electric charges • Macro - electric current • Micro - spin + orbital momentum Ampère 1822 Poisson model Magnetic dipole – magnetic (dipole) moment [A m2] i A 4 Ampere model Magnetism Microscopic explanation of source of magnetism = Fundamental quantum magnets Unpaired electrons = spins (Bohr 1913) Atomic building blocks (protons, neutrons and electrons = fermions) possess an intrinsic magnetic moment Relativistic quantum theory (P. Dirac 1928) SPIN (quantum property ~ rotation of charged particles) Spin (½ for all fermions) gives rise to a magnetic moment 5 Atomic Motions of Electric Charges The origins for the magnetic moment of a free atom Motions of Electric Charges: 1) The spins of the electrons S. Unpaired spins give a paramagnetic contribution. Paired spins give a diamagnetic contribution. 2) The orbital angular momentum L of the electrons about the nucleus, degenerate orbitals, paramagnetic contribution. The change in the orbital moment
    [Show full text]
  • New Realization of the Ohm and Farad Using the NBS Calculable Capacitor
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INSTRUMENTATION AND MEASUREMENT, VOL. 38, NO. 2, APRIL 1989 249 New Realization of the Ohm and Farad Using the NBS Calculable Capacitor JOHN Q. SHIELDS, RONALD F. DZIUBA, MEMBER, IEEE,AND HOWARD P. LAYER Abstrucl-Results of a new realization of the ohm and farad using part of the NBS effort. This paper describes our measure- the NBS calculable capacitor and associated apparatus are reported. ments and gives our latest results. The results show that both the NBS representation of the ohm and the NBS representation of the farad are changing with time, cNBSat the rate of -0.054 ppmlyear and FNssat the rate of 0.010 ppm/year. The 11. AC MEASUREMENTS realization of the ohm is of particular significance at this time because The measurement sequence used in the 1974 ohm and of its role in assigning an SI value to the quantized Hall resistance. The farad determinations [2] has been retained in the present estimated uncertainty of the ohm realization is 0.022 ppm (lo) while the estimated uncertainty of the farad realization is 0.014 ppm (la). NBS measurements. A 0.5-pF calculable cross-capacitor is used to measure a transportable 10-pF reference capac- itor which is carried to the laboratory containing the NBS I. INTRODUCTION bank of 10-pF fused silica reference capacitors. A 10: 1 HE NBS REPRESENTATION of the ohm is bridge is used in two stages to measure two 1000-pF ca- T based on the mean resistance of five Thomas-type pacitors which are in turn used as two arms of a special wire-wound resistors maintained in a 25°C oil bath at NBS frequency-dependent bridge for measuring two 100-kQ Gaithersburg, MD.
    [Show full text]
  • An Introduction to Hartree-Fock Molecular Orbital Theory
    An Introduction to Hartree-Fock Molecular Orbital Theory C. David Sherrill School of Chemistry and Biochemistry Georgia Institute of Technology June 2000 1 Introduction Hartree-Fock theory is fundamental to much of electronic structure theory. It is the basis of molecular orbital (MO) theory, which posits that each electron's motion can be described by a single-particle function (orbital) which does not depend explicitly on the instantaneous motions of the other electrons. Many of you have probably learned about (and maybe even solved prob- lems with) HucÄ kel MO theory, which takes Hartree-Fock MO theory as an implicit foundation and throws away most of the terms to make it tractable for simple calculations. The ubiquity of orbital concepts in chemistry is a testimony to the predictive power and intuitive appeal of Hartree-Fock MO theory. However, it is important to remember that these orbitals are mathematical constructs which only approximate reality. Only for the hydrogen atom (or other one-electron systems, like He+) are orbitals exact eigenfunctions of the full electronic Hamiltonian. As long as we are content to consider molecules near their equilibrium geometry, Hartree-Fock theory often provides a good starting point for more elaborate theoretical methods which are better approximations to the elec- tronic SchrÄodinger equation (e.g., many-body perturbation theory, single-reference con¯guration interaction). So...how do we calculate molecular orbitals using Hartree-Fock theory? That is the subject of these notes; we will explain Hartree-Fock theory at an introductory level. 2 What Problem Are We Solving? It is always important to remember the context of a theory.
    [Show full text]
  • Simplified Hartree-Fock Computations on Second-Row Atoms
    Simplified Hartree-Fock Computations on Second-Row Atoms S. M. Blinder Wolfram Research, Inc. Champaign, IL 61820, USA May 18, 2021 Modern computational quantum chemistry has developed to a large extent beginning with applications of the Hartree-Fock method to atoms and molecules[1]. Density-functional methods have now largely supplanted conventional Hartree-Fock computations in current applications of computational chemistry. Still, from a pedagogical point of view, an un- derstanding of the original methods remains a necessary preliminary. However, since more elaborate Hartree-Fock computations are now no longer needed, it will suffice to consider a computationally simplified application of the method[2]. Accordingly, we will represent the many-electron wavefunction by a single closed-shell Slater determinant and use basis functions which are simple Slater-type orbitals. This is in contrast to the more elaborate Hartree-Fock computations, which might use multi-determinant wavefunctions and double- zeta basis functions. All of the symbolic and numerical operations were carried out using Mathematica. We consider Hartree-Fock computations on the ground states of the second-row atoms He through Ne, Z = 2 to 10, using the simplest set of orthonormalized 1s, 2s and 2p orbital functions: s α3=2 3β5 α + β = p e−αr; = 1 − r e−βr; 1s π 2s π(α2 − αβ + β2) 3 5=2 γ −γr 2pfx;y;zg = p re fsin θ cos φ, sin θ sin φ, cos θg: (1) arXiv:2105.07018v1 [quant-ph] 14 May 2021 π An orbital function multiplied by a spin function α or β is known as a spinorbital, a product of the form ( α φ(x) = (r) : (2) β 1 A simple representation of a many-electron atom is given by a Slater determinant con- structed from N occupied spin-orbitals: φa(1) φb(1) : : : φn(1) 1 φa(2) φb(2) : : : φn(2) Ψ(1;:::;N) = p ; (3) .
    [Show full text]
  • Modern Physics Unit 15: Nuclear Structure and Decay Lecture 15.1: Nuclear Characteristics
    Modern Physics Unit 15: Nuclear Structure and Decay Lecture 15.1: Nuclear Characteristics Ron Reifenberger Professor of Physics Purdue University 1 Nucleons - the basic building blocks of the nucleus Also written as: 7 3 Li ~10-15 m Examples: A X=Chemical Element Z X Z = number of protons = atomic number 12 A = atomic mass number = Z+N 6 C N= A-Z = number of neutrons 35 17 Cl 2 What is the size of a nucleus? Three possibilities • Range of nuclear force? • Mass radius? • Charge radius? It turns out that for nuclear matter Nuclear force radius ≈ mass radius ≈ charge radius defines nuclear force range defines nuclear surface 3 Nuclear Charge Density The size of the lighter nuclei can be approximated by modeling the nuclear charge density ρ (C/m3): t ≈ 4.4a; a=0.54 fm 90% 10% Usually infer the best values for ρo, R and a for a given nucleus from scattering experiments 4 Nuclear mass density Scattering experiments indicate the nucleus is roughly spherical with a radius given by 1 3 −15 R = RRooA ; =1.07 × 10meters= 1.07 fm = 1.07 fermis A=atomic mass number What is the nuclear mass density of the most common isotope of iron? 56 26 Fe⇒= A56; Z = 26, N = 30 m Am⋅⋅3 Am 33A ⋅ m m ρ = nuc p= p= pp = o 1 33 VR4 3 3 3 44ππA R nuc π R 4(π RAo ) o o 3 3×× 1.66 10−27 kg = 3.2× 1017kg / m 3 4×× 3.14 (1.07 × 10−15m ) 3 The mass density is constant, independent of A! 5 Nuclear mass density for 27Al, 97Mo, 238U (from scattering experiments) (kg/m3) ρo heavy mass nucleus light mass nucleus middle mass nucleus 6 Typical Densities Material Density Helium 0.18 kg/m3 Air (dry) 1.2 kg/m3 Styrofoam ~100 kg/m3 Water 1000 kg/m3 Iron 7870 kg/m3 Lead 11,340 kg/m3 17 3 Nuclear Matter ~10 kg/m 7 Isotopes - same chemical element but different mass (J.J.
    [Show full text]
  • A Self-Interaction-Free Local Hybrid Functional: Accurate Binding
    A self-interaction-free local hybrid functional: accurate binding energies vis-`a-vis accurate ionization potentials from Kohn-Sham eigenvalues Tobias Schmidt,1, ∗ Eli Kraisler,2, ∗ Adi Makmal,2, † Leeor Kronik,2 and Stephan K¨ummel1 1Theoretical Physics IV, University of Bayreuth, 95440 Bayreuth, Germany 2Department of Materials and Interfaces, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovoth 76100,Israel (Dated: September 12, 2018) We present and test a new approximation for the exchange-correlation (xc) energy of Kohn- Sham density functional theory. It combines exact exchange with a compatible non-local correlation functional. The functional is by construction free of one-electron self-interaction, respects constraints derived from uniform coordinate scaling, and has the correct asymptotic behavior of the xc energy density. It contains one parameter that is not determined ab initio. We investigate whether it is possible to construct a functional that yields accurate binding energies and affords other advantages, specifically Kohn-Sham eigenvalues that reliably reflect ionization potentials. Tests for a set of atoms and small molecules show that within our local-hybrid form accurate binding energies can be achieved by proper optimization of the free parameter in our functional, along with an improvement in dissociation energy curves and in Kohn-Sham eigenvalues. However, the correspondence of the latter to experimental ionization potentials is not yet satisfactory, and if we choose to optimize their prediction, a rather different value of the functional’s parameter is obtained. We put this finding in a larger context by discussing similar observations for other functionals and possible directions for further functional development that our findings suggest.
    [Show full text]
  • Lecture #4, Matter/Energy Interactions, Emissions Spectra, Quantum Numbers
    Welcome to 3.091 Lecture 4 September 16, 2009 Matter/Energy Interactions: Atomic Spectra 3.091 Periodic Table Quiz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 Name Grade /10 Image by MIT OpenCourseWare. Rutherford-Geiger-Marsden experiment Image by MIT OpenCourseWare. Bohr Postulates for the Hydrogen Atom 1. Rutherford atom is correct 2. Classical EM theory not applicable to orbiting e- 3. Newtonian mechanics applicable to orbiting e- 4. Eelectron = Ekinetic + Epotential 5. e- energy quantized through its angular momentum: L = mvr = nh/2π, n = 1, 2, 3,… 6. Planck-Einstein relation applies to e- transitions: ΔE = Ef - Ei = hν = hc/λ c = νλ _ _ 24 1 18 Bohr magneton µΒ = eh/2me 9.274 015 4(31) X 10 J T 0.34 _ _ 27 1 19 Nuclear magneton µΝ = eh/2mp 5.050 786 6(17) X 10 J T 0.34 _ 2 3 20 Fine structure constant α = µ0ce /2h 7.297 353 08(33) X 10 0.045 21 Inverse fine structure constant 1/α 137.035 989 5(61) 0.045 _ 2 1 22 Rydberg constant R¥ = mecα /2h 10 973 731.534(13) m 0.0012 23 Rydberg constant in eV R¥ hc/{e} 13.605 698 1(40) eV 0.30 _ 10 24 Bohr radius a0 = a/4πR¥ 0.529 177 249(24) X 10 m 0.045 _ _ 4 2 1 25 Quantum of circulation h/2me 3.636 948 07(33) X 10 m s 0.089 _ 11 1 26 Electron specific charge -e/me -1.758 819 62(53) X 10 C kg 0.30 _ 12 27 Electron Compton wavelength λC = h/mec 2.426 310 58(22) X 10 m 0.089 _ 2 15 28 Electron classical radius re = α a0 2.817 940 92(38) X 10 m 0.13 _ _ 26 1 29 Electron magnetic moment` µe 928.477 01(31) X 10 J T 0.34 _ _ 3 30 Electron mag.
    [Show full text]
  • Electric Units and Standards
    DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE OF THE Bureau of Standards S. W. STRATTON, Director No. 60 ELECTRIC UNITS AND STANDARDS list Edition 1 Issued September 25. 1916 WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Circular OF THE Bureau of Standards S. W. STRATTON, Director No. 60 ELECTRIC UNITS AND STANDARDS [1st Edition] Issued September 25, 1916 WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1916 ADDITIONAL COPIES OF THIS PUBLICATION MAY BE PROCURED FROM THE SUPERINTENDENT OF DOCUMENTS GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON, D. C. AT 15 CENTS PER COPY A complete list of the Bureau’s publications may be obtained free of charge on application to the Bureau of Standards, Washington, D. C. ELECTRIC UNITS AND STANDARDS CONTENTS Page I. The systems of units 4 1. Units and standards in general 4 2. The electrostatic and electromagnetic systems 8 () The numerically different systems of units 12 () Gaussian systems, and ratios of the units 13 “ ’ (c) Practical ’ electromagnetic units 15 3. The international electric units 16 II. Evolution of present system of concrete standards 18 1. Early electric standards 18 2. Basis of present laws 22 3. Progress since 1893 24 III. Units and standards of the principal electric quantities 29 1. Resistance 29 () International ohm 29 Definition 29 Mercury standards 30 Secondary standards 31 () Resistance standards in practice 31 (c) Absolute ohm 32 2. Current 33 (a) International ampere 33 Definition 34 The silver voltameter 35 ( b ) Resistance standards used in current measurement 36 (c) Absolute ampere 37 3. Electromotive force 38 (a) International volt 38 Definition 39 Weston normal cell 39 (b) Portable Weston cells 41 (c) Absolute and semiabsolute volt 42 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide for the Use of the International System of Units (SI)
    Guide for the Use of the International System of Units (SI) m kg s cd SI mol K A NIST Special Publication 811 2008 Edition Ambler Thompson and Barry N. Taylor NIST Special Publication 811 2008 Edition Guide for the Use of the International System of Units (SI) Ambler Thompson Technology Services and Barry N. Taylor Physics Laboratory National Institute of Standards and Technology Gaithersburg, MD 20899 (Supersedes NIST Special Publication 811, 1995 Edition, April 1995) March 2008 U.S. Department of Commerce Carlos M. Gutierrez, Secretary National Institute of Standards and Technology James M. Turner, Acting Director National Institute of Standards and Technology Special Publication 811, 2008 Edition (Supersedes NIST Special Publication 811, April 1995 Edition) Natl. Inst. Stand. Technol. Spec. Publ. 811, 2008 Ed., 85 pages (March 2008; 2nd printing November 2008) CODEN: NSPUE3 Note on 2nd printing: This 2nd printing dated November 2008 of NIST SP811 corrects a number of minor typographical errors present in the 1st printing dated March 2008. Guide for the Use of the International System of Units (SI) Preface The International System of Units, universally abbreviated SI (from the French Le Système International d’Unités), is the modern metric system of measurement. Long the dominant measurement system used in science, the SI is becoming the dominant measurement system used in international commerce. The Omnibus Trade and Competitiveness Act of August 1988 [Public Law (PL) 100-418] changed the name of the National Bureau of Standards (NBS) to the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) and gave to NIST the added task of helping U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Topic 0991 Electrochemical Units Electric Current the SI Base
    Topic 0991 Electrochemical Units Electric Current The SI base electrical unit is the AMPERE which is that constant electric current which if maintained in two straight parallel conductors of infinite length and of negligible circular cross section and placed a metre apart in a vacuum would produce between these conductors a force equal to 2 x 10-7 newton per metre length. It is interesting to note that definition of the Ampere involves a derived SI unit, the newton. Except in certain specialised applications, electric currents of the order ‘amperes’ are rare. Starter motors in cars require for a short time a current of several amperes. When a current of one ampere passes through a wire about 6.2 x 1018 electrons pass a given point in one second [1,2]. The coulomb (symbol C) is the electric charge which passes through an electrical conductor when an electric current of one A flows for one second. Thus [C] = [A s] (a) Electric Potential In order to pass an electric current thorough an electrical conductor a difference in electric potential must exist across the electrical conductor. If the energy expended by a flow of one ampere for one second equals one Joule the electric potential difference across the electrical conductor is one volt [3]. Electrical Resistance and Conductance If the electric potential difference across an electrical conductor is one volt when the electrical current is one ampere, the electrical resistance is one ohm, symbol Ω [4]. The inverse of electrical resistance , the conductance, is measured using the unit siemens, symbol [S].
    [Show full text]
  • Mercury Barometers and Manometers
    NBS MONOGRAPH 8 Mercuiy Barometers and Manometers U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE NATIONAL BUREAU OF STANDARDS THE NATIONAL BUREAU OF STANDARDS Functions and Activities The functions of the National Bureau of Standards are set forth in the Act of Congress, March 3, 1901, as amended by Congress in Public Law 619, 1950. These include the development and maintenance of the national standards of measurement and the provision of means and methods for making measurements consistent with these standards; the determination of physical constants and properties of materials; the development of methods and instruments for testing materials, devices, and structures; advisory services to government agencies on scientific and technical problems; in- vention and development of devices to serve special needs of the Government; and the development of standard practices, codes, and specifications. The work includes basic and applied research, development, engineering, instrumentation, testing, evaluation, calibration services, and various consultation and information services. Research projects are also performed for other government agencies when the work relates to and supplements the basic program of the Bureau or when the Bureau's unique competence is required. The scope of activities is suggested by the listing of divisions and sections on the inside of the back cover. Publications The results of the Bureau's work take the form of either actual equipment and devices or pub- lished papers. These papers appear either in the Bureau's own series of publications or in the journals of professional and scientific societies. The Bureau itself publishes three periodicals available from the Government Printing Office: The Journal of Research, published in four separate sections, presents complete scientific and technical papers; the Technical News Bulletin presents summary and pre- liminary reports on work in progress; and Basic Radio Propagation Predictions provides data for determining the best frequencies to use for radio communications throughout the world.
    [Show full text]