Microstructure of As-Cast Ferritic-Pearlitic Nodular Cast Irons Jacques Lacaze, Jon Sertucha, Lena Magnusson Åberg

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Microstructure of As-Cast Ferritic-Pearlitic Nodular Cast Irons Jacques Lacaze, Jon Sertucha, Lena Magnusson Åberg Microstructure of as-cast ferritic-pearlitic nodular cast irons Jacques Lacaze, Jon Sertucha, Lena Magnusson Åberg To cite this version: Jacques Lacaze, Jon Sertucha, Lena Magnusson Åberg. Microstructure of as-cast ferritic-pearlitic nodular cast irons. ISIJ international, Iron & Steel Institute of Japan, 2016, vol. 56 (n° 9), pp. 1606-1615. 10.2355/isijinternational.ISIJINT-2016-108. hal-01565250 HAL Id: hal-01565250 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01565250 Submitted on 19 Jul 2017 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Open Archive TOULOUSE Archive Ouverte ( OATAO ) OATAO is an open access repository that collects the work of Toulouse researchers and makes it freely available over the web where possible. This is an author-deposited version published in : http://oatao.univ-toulouse.fr/ Eprints ID : 18081 To link to this article : DOI: 10.2355/isijinternational.ISIJINT-2016-108 URL : http://dx.doi.org/10.2355/isijinternational.ISIJINT-2016-108 To cite this version : Lacaze, Jacques and Sertucha, Jon and Åberg, Lena Magnusson Microstructure of as-cast ferritic-pearlitic nodular cast irons. (2016) ISIJ International, vol. 56 (n° 9). pp. 1606-1615. ISSN 0915-1559 Any correspondence concerning this service should be sent to the repository administrator: [email protected] Microstructure of As-cast Ferritic-pearlitic Nodular Cast Irons Jacques LACAZE,1)* Jon SERTUCHA2) and Lena MAGNUSSON ÅBERG3) 1) CIRIMAT, Université de Toulouse, 31030, Toulouse, France. 2) Engineering and Foundry Process Department, IK4- Azterlan, 48200, Durango (Bizkaia), Spain. 3) Elkem AS Foundry Products R͗D, P.O. Box 8040 Vaagsbygd, NO-4675, Kristiansand, Norway. A review of past works on the formation of ferrite and pearlite in nodular cast iron is proposed. The effects of cooling rate after solidification and of nodule count on the formation of both constituents are stressed, though much emphasis is put on alloying elements and impurities. KEY WORDS: nodular cast iron; as-cast microstructure; ferrite; pearlite; alloying. One of the most relevant advantages of nodular cast iron 1. Introduction is their extensive application in the as-cast condition. This Nodular cast irons are composite materials made of reduces the manufacturing cost and potential problems graphite spheroids embedded in a Fe-rich matrix. Their related to variability from heat-treatment are avoided. The mechanical properties depend both on nodule count and on ¿UVWVHFWLRQEHORZGHDOVZLWKWKHSULQFLSOHRIWKHHXWHFWRLG the matrix constitution resulting from the transformation of transformation of austenite in the stable and metastable high-temperature austenite formed together with graphite V\VWHPVSXWWLQJHPSKDVLVRQWKHUROHRIDOOR\LQJHOHPHQWV GXULQJWKHVROLGL¿FDWLRQVWHS,QDVFDVWPDWHULDOVWKLVWUDQV- (mostly pearlite promoting elements). The following section IRUPDWLRQFDQOHDGWRIHUULWHRUSHDUOLWHRUWRDPL[RIWKHP is devoted to attempts to predict room temperature matrix and sometimes to martensite in case of highly alloyed irons VWUXFWXUHRQWKHEDVLVRIPHOWFRPSRVLWLRQi.e. considering cast in small sections. Bainite is not observed in as-cast FRPSHWLWLRQRIIHUULWHDQGSHDUOLWH,QWKHFRQFOXVLRQVRPH LURQVLWLVREWDLQHGDIWHUDSSURSULDWHKHDWWUHDWPHQWDQGZLOO SURSRVDOVIRUIXUWKHUVWXGLHVLQWKLV¿HOGZLOOEHGHWDLOHG not be considered further here where focus is put on as-cast irons with ferritic-pearlitic structures. The ferritic-pearlitic 2. Eutectoid Transformation of Austenite matrix consists of halos of ferrite around the nodules and SHDUOLWH DZD\ IURP WKHP ODVW WR IUHH]H DUHDV JLYLQJ WKH $PRQJDIHZRWKHUDXWKRUV-RKQVRQDQG.RYDFV1) have so-called bulls-eye structure illustrated in Fig. 1. GHVFULEHG KRZ WKH PLFURVWUXFWXUH LQ )LJ HYROYHV ZLWK austenite starting to decompose in the stable system giving ferrite halos growing symmetrically around graphite nod- ules. Further growth of ferrite involves transfer of carbon from the remaining austenite to graphite nodules by diffu- sion through the ferrite halo (this will hereafter be called the ferritic reaction). The process is thus slower and slower as WKHWKLFNQHVVRIWKHKDORVLQFUHDVHV+HQFHXSRQFRQWLQX- RXV FRROLQJ RI WKH PDWHULDO WKH WHPSHUDWXUH FDQ EHFRPH low enough for nucleation and growth of pearlite in the metastable system (hereafter called the pearlitic reaction). Pearlite growth is comparatively rapid because it proceeds E\ FRRSHUDWLYH FRXSOHG JURZWK RI FHPHQWLWH DQG IHUULWH certainly much like in steels according to Pan et al.2) and Venugopalan.3))XUWKHU-RKQVRQDQG.RYDFV1) could show that pearlite appears at the ferrite/austenite interface and develops as spherical colonies inside the remaining austen- LWH7KXVIHUULWHFDQVWLOOJURZDIWHUWKHSHDUOLWLFUHDFWLRQKDV Fig. 1. Bull-eyes structure of nodular cast irons showing halos of VWDUWHGEXWWKHJURZWKUDWHRIWKLVODWWHULVVXFKWKDWDXVWHQLWH ferrite (white contrast) around graphite nodules (dark con- decomposition is most generally quickly completed. WUDVW WKH UHPDLQLQJ RI WKH PDWUL[ EHLQJ SHDUOLWH GDUN grey contrast). An important number of foundries include thermal analysis for controlling melt preparation before casting * Corresponding author: E-mail: [email protected] using commercial standard rig and cups. Figure 2 shows DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2355/isijinternational.ISIJINT-2016-108 an example of such a record when the output has been Fig. 2. Cooling curve and its derivative obtained by casting a standard thermal analysis cup with a nodular cast iron &6L0Q&XZW DIWHU6HUWXFKDet al. TαH[S7SH[S and Ttrans are respectively the experimen- tal temperatures for the start of the ferritic and pearlitic UHDFWLRQVDQGIRUWKHPD[LPXPLQWKHGHULYDWLYHFXUYH Fig. 3. Schematic of ferrite formation as halos around the graph- ite nodules and corresponding radial carbon distribution. pursued down to low enough temperature to register the ΔwC should be positive for carbon to diffuse to graphite solid-state transformation of the alloy. The derivative of the from the ferrite/austenite interface to the graphite nodule. temperature with respect to time (i.e. the cooling rate) is also SORWWHGZKLFKVKRZVWKDWERWKVROLGL¿FDWLRQDQGVROLGVWDWH transformations appearing as plateaus on the cooling curve give sharp changes in the derivative. Focusing on the part of the derivative record corresponding to the solid-state WUDQVIRUPDWLRQLWLVVHHQWKDWLWFRXOGEHGLYLGHGLQWZREHOO VKDSHVLJQDOVZKLFKFRUUHVSRQGWRWKHIHUULWLFDQGSHDUOLWLF reactions. On such curves it is possible to measure the cool- ing rate of the material before the eutectoid transformation and the temperatures for the start of the ferritic and pearlitic reactions. Integration of the area below the derivative peak FRXOG DOVR OHDG WR D ¿UVW HVWLPDWH RI WKH WUDQVIRUPDWLRQ kinetics. The same characterization could be performed as well on differential thermal analysis (DTA) records where the cooling rate is imposed. 2.1. Formation of Ferrite Figure 3 schematically illustrates ferrite growth described above. One particular feature of the ferritic reaction is the fact that no redistribution of substitutional elements at the Fig. 4. ,VRSOHWK)H±&VHFWLRQRIWKH)H±&±6LV\VWHPDWZW ferrite/austenite interface has been reported for as cast mate- Si in the stable eutectoid range. ΔwC shows the difference ULDOV,QRWKHUZRUGVWKHIHUULWHLQKHULWVWKHDOOR\LQJFRQWHQW between the carbon content at the ferrite/austenite inter- α/ γ D /gra RIWKHSDUHQWDXVWHQLWHWKLVLVWKHVRFDOOHGSDUDIHUULWHPHQ- IDFHwC DQGDWWKHJUDSKLWHIHUULWHLQWHUIDFHwC . WLRQHGE\9HQXJRSDODQ3) see appendix. If one assumes the PDWUL[ LV FKHPLFDOO\ KRPRJHQHRXV DQ LVRSOHWK )H±& VHF- WLRQRIWKHUHOHYDQWV\VWHPe.g. the one drawn at 2.5 wt.% carbon distribution in Fig. 3 demonstrates that this diffusion α/ γ D /gra silicon in Fig. 4 LV WKXV UHOHYDQW IRU GHVFULELQJ DXVWHQLWH could proceed only if ΔwC = wC ±wC LVSRVLWLYHZKHUH α/ γ D /gra graphite equilibrium at temperatures above the three-phase wC and wC are the carbon content in ferrite (α) in equi- GRPDLQ DQG IHUULWHJUDSKLWH HTXLOLEULXP DW WHPSHUDWXUHV librium with austenite (γ) and graphite (gra) respectively. below this domain. It is worth noting the very low level of 7KLV FRQGLWLRQ LV IXO¿OOHG DW WHPSHUDWXUHV EHORZ WKH WKUHH carbon that can dissolve in ferrite as compared to that in SKDVH ¿HOG VHH )LJ PHDQLQJ WKDW WKH FDUERQ FRQWHQW WKH SDUHQW DXVWHQLWH 'XULQJ JURZWK RI IHUULWH FDUERQ FDQ in the growing ferrite and in the receding austenite should be rejected partly to austenite but growth of graphite will be described by the metastable extrapolations (shown with proceed mainly by diffusion of carbon to graphite through dashed lines) of the equilibrium lines (solid lines). Note that the ferrite halo. Following Lacaze et al.± the schematic of DV WKH WHPSHUDWXUH GHFUHDVHV WKH FDUERQ FRQWHQW LQ IHUULWH α/ γ LQHTXLOLEULXPZLWKDXVWHQLWHwC DQGWKDWRIDXVWHQLWHLQ )RU DQDO\VLV RI GDWD REWDLQHG RQ DOOR\V FRROHG DW ¿QLWH γ/ α HTXLOLEULXPZLWKIHUULWHwC LQFUHDVH UDWHIRUZKLFKWKHPRGHOLQ)LJDSSOLHVLWLVFRQYHQLHQW Once the temperature of the alloy has reached the three to plot the undercooling for the start of the ferritic reaction
Recommended publications
  • High-Carbon Steels: Fully Pearlitic Microstructures and Applications
    © 2005 ASM International. All Rights Reserved. www.asminternational.org Steels: Processing, Structure, and Performance (#05140G) CHAPTER 15 High-Carbon Steels: Fully Pearlitic Microstructures and Applications Introduction THE TRANSFORMATION OF AUSTENITE to pearlite has been de- scribed in Chapter 4, “Pearlite, Ferrite, and Cementite,” and Chapter 13, “Normalizing, Annealing, and Spheroidizing Treatments; Ferrite/Pearlite Microstructures in Medium-Carbon Steels,” which have shown that as microstructure becomes fully pearlitic as steel carbon content approaches the eutectiod composition, around 0.80% carbon, strength increases, but resistance to cleavage fracture decreases. This chapter describes the me- chanical properties and demanding applications for which steels with fully pearlitic microstructures are well suited. With increasing cooling rates in the pearlite continuous cooling trans- formation range, or with isothermal transformation temperatures ap- proaching the pearlite nose of isothermal transformation diagrams, Fig. 4.3 in Chapter 4, the interlamellar spacing of pearlitic ferrite and cementite becomes very fine. As a result, for most ferrite/pearlite microstructures, the interlamellar spacing is too fine to be resolved in the light microscope, and the pearlite appears uniformly dark. Therefore, to resolve the inter- lamellar spacing of pearlite, scanning electron microscopy, and for the finest spacings, transmission electron microscopy (TEM), are necessary to resolve the two-phase structure of pearlite. Figure 15.1 is a TEM mi- crograph showing very fine interlamellar structure in a colony of pearlite from a high-carbon steel rail. This remarkable composite structure of duc- © 2005 ASM International. All Rights Reserved. www.asminternational.org Steels: Processing, Structure, and Performance (#05140G) 282 / Steels: Processing, Structure, and Performance tile ferrite and high-strength cementite is the base microstructure for rail and the starting microstructure for high-strength wire applications.
    [Show full text]
  • Carbon Steel
    EN380 12-wk Exam Solution Fall 2019 Carbon Steel. 1. [19 pts] Three compositions of plain carbon steel are cooled very slowly in a turned-off furnace from ≈ 830◦C (see phase diagram below). For each composition, the FCC grains of γ−austenite (prior to transformation) are shown in an optical micrograph of the material surface. Sketch and label the phases making up the microstructures present in the right hand micrograph just after the austenite has completed transformation (note: the gray outlines of the prior γ grains may prove helpful). (a) [4 pts] C0 = 0:42% C (by wt). 830◦C 726◦C EN380 12-wk Exam Solution Page 1 Fall 2019 EN380 12-wk Exam Solution Fall 2019 (b) [4 pts] C0 = 0:80% C (by wt). 830◦C 726◦C (c) [4 pts] C0 = 1:05% C (by wt). 830◦C 726◦C (d) [7 pts] For the composition of part (c), C0 = 1:05% C (by wt), calculate the fraction of the solid that is pearlite at 726◦C. CF e3C − C0 6:67% − 1:05% Wpearlite = Wγ at 728◦C = = = 95:74% Pearlite CF e3C − Cγ 6:67% − 0:8% EN380 12-wk Exam Solution Page 2 Fall 2019 EN380 12-wk Exam Solution Fall 2019 2. [11 pts] Write in the correct term for each of the following related to carbon steels[1 pt each] (terms will be used exactly once): This material features carbon content in excess of Cast Iron 2:0% and is known for its excellent hardness, wear resistance, machinability and castability.
    [Show full text]
  • Structure/Property Relationships in Irons and Steels Bruce L
    Copyright © 1998 ASM International® Metals Handbook Desk Edition, Second Edition All rights reserved. J.R. Davis, Editor, p 153-173 www.asminternational.org Structure/Property Relationships in Irons and Steels Bruce L. Bramfitt, Homer Research Laboratories, Bethlehem Steel Corporation Basis of Material Selection ............................................... 153 Role of Microstructure .................................................. 155 Ferrite ............................................................. 156 Pearlite ............................................................ 158 Ferrite-Pearl ite ....................................................... 160 Bainite ............................................................ 162 Martensite .................................... ...................... 164 Austenite ........................................................... 169 Ferrite-Cementite ..................................................... 170 Ferrite-Martensite .................................................... 171 Ferrite-Austenite ..................................................... 171 Graphite ........................................................... 172 Cementite .......................................................... 172 This Section was adapted from Materials 5election and Design, Volume 20, ASM Handbook, 1997, pages 357-382. Additional information can also be found in the Sections on cast irons and steels which immediately follow in this Handbook and by consulting the index. THE PROPERTIES of irons and steels
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 12: Phase Transformations
    Chapter 12: Phase Transformations ISSUES TO ADDRESS... • Transforming one phase into another takes time. Fe Fe C Eutectoid 3 γ transformation (cementite) (Austenite) + α C FCC (ferrite) (BCC) • How does the rate of transformation depend on time and temperature ? • Is it possible to slow down transformations so that non-equilibrium structures are formed? • Are the mechanical properties of non-equilibrium structures more desirable than equilibrium ones? AMSE 205 Spring ‘2016 Chapter 12 - 1 Phase Transformations Nucleation – nuclei (seeds) act as templates on which crystals grow – for nucleus to form rate of addition of atoms to nucleus must be faster than rate of loss – once nucleated, growth proceeds until equilibrium is attained Driving force to nucleate increases as we increase ΔT – supercooling (eutectic, eutectoid) – superheating (peritectic) Small supercooling slow nucleation rate - few nuclei - large crystals Large supercooling rapid nucleation rate - many nuclei - small crystals AMSE 205 Spring ‘2016 Chapter 12 - 2 Solidification: Nucleation Types • Homogeneous nucleation – nuclei form in the bulk of liquid metal – requires considerable supercooling (typically 80-300 °C) • Heterogeneous nucleation – much easier since stable “nucleating surface” is already present — e.g., mold wall, impurities in liquid phase – only very slight supercooling (0.1-10 °C) AMSE 205 Spring ‘2016 Chapter 12 - 3 Homogeneous Nucleation & Energy Effects Surface Free Energy- destabilizes the nuclei (it takes energy to make an interface) γ = surface tension ΔGT = Total Free Energy = ΔGS + ΔGV Volume (Bulk) Free Energy – stabilizes the nuclei (releases energy) r* = critical nucleus: for r < r* nuclei shrink; for r > r* nuclei grow (to reduce energy) Adapted from Fig.12.2(b), Callister & Rethwisch 9e.
    [Show full text]
  • New Extremely Low Carbon Bainitic High-Strength Steel Bar Having Excellent Machinability and Toughness Produced by TPCP Technology*
    KAWASAKI STEEL TECHNICAL REPORT No. 47 December 2002 New Extremely Low Carbon Bainitic High-Strength Steel Bar Having Excellent Machinability and Toughness Produced by TPCP Technology* Synopsis: A non heat-treated high strength steel bar for machine structural use through a thermo-mechanical precipita- tion control process (hereafter, referred to as TPCP) has been developed. The newly developed TPCP is a tech- nique for controlling the strength of the steel by precipi- tation hardening effected with the benefit of an extremely low carbon bainitic microstructure. The carbon content Kazukuni Hase Toshiyuki Hoshino Keniti Amano of the steel is decreased to below 0.02 mass% for realiz- Senior Researcher, Dr. Eng., Senior Dr. Eng., General Plate, Shape & Joining Researcher, Plate, Manager, Plate, Shape ing the proper microstructure, which improves both the Lab., Shape & Joining Lab., & Joining Lab., notch toughness and machinability. In order to make the Technical Res. Labs. Technical Res. Labs. Technical Res. Labs. microstructure bainitic and to obtain effective precipita- tion hardening, some micro-alloying elements are added. The developed steel manufactured with these advanced techniques showed a higher impact value, higher yield strength and better machinability than those 1 Introdution of the quenched and tempered AISI 4137 steel. The impact value of the steel is 250 J/cm2 or more at room In the fields of automobiles and industrial machines temperature. The problem of the reduction in yield ratio, where carbon steels and low alloy steels
    [Show full text]
  • Materials Technology – Placement
    MATERIAL TECHNOLOGY 01. An eutectoid steel consists of A. Wholly pearlite B. Pearlite and ferrite C. Wholly austenite D. Pearlite and cementite ANSWER: A 02. Iron-carbon alloys containing 1.7 to 4.3% carbon are known as A. Eutectic cast irons B. Hypo-eutectic cast irons C. Hyper-eutectic cast irons D. Eutectoid cast irons ANSWER: B 03. The hardness of steel increases if it contains A. Pearlite B. Ferrite C. Cementite D. Martensite ANSWER: C 04. Pearlite is a combination of A. Ferrite and cementite B. Ferrite and austenite C. Ferrite and iron graphite D. Pearlite and ferrite ANSWER: A 05. Austenite is a combination of A. Ferrite and cementite B. Cementite and gamma iron C. Ferrite and austenite D. Pearlite and ferrite ANSWER: B 06. Maximum percentage of carbon in ferrite is A. 0.025% B. 0.06% C. 0.1% D. 0.25% ANSWER: A 07. Maximum percentage of carbon in austenite is A. 0.025% B. 0.8% 1 C. 1.25% D. 1.7% ANSWER: D 08. Pure iron is the structure of A. Ferrite B. Pearlite C. Austenite D. Ferrite and pearlite ANSWER: A 09. Austenite phase in Iron-Carbon equilibrium diagram _______ A. Is face centered cubic structure B. Has magnetic phase C. Exists below 727o C D. Has body centered cubic structure ANSWER: A 10. What is the crystal structure of Alpha-ferrite? A. Body centered cubic structure B. Face centered cubic structure C. Orthorhombic crystal structure D. Tetragonal crystal structure ANSWER: A 11. In Iron-Carbon equilibrium diagram, at which temperature cementite changes fromferromagnetic to paramagnetic character? A.
    [Show full text]
  • Cast Irons$ KB Rundman, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, MI, USA F Iacoviello, Università Di Cassino E Del Lazio Meridionale, DICEM, Cassino (FR), Italy
    Cast Irons$ KB Rundman, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, MI, USA F Iacoviello, Università di Cassino e del Lazio Meridionale, DICEM, Cassino (FR), Italy r 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. 1 Metallurgy of Cast Iron 1 2 Solidification of a Hypoeutectic Gray Iron Alloy With CE¼4.0 3 3 Matrix Microstructures in Graphitic Cast Irons – Cooling Below the Eutectic 3 4 Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Gray Cast Iron 4 5 Effect of Carbon Equivalent 5 6 Effect of Matrix Microstructure 5 7 Effect of Alloying Elements 5 8 Classes of Gray Cast Irons and Brinell Hardness 5 9 Ductile Cast Iron 5 10 Production of Ductile Iron 6 11 Solidification and Microstructures of Hypereutectic Ductile Cast Irons 6 12 Mechanical Properties of Ductile Cast Iron 7 13 As-cast and Quenched and Tempered Grades of Ductile Iron 8 14 Malleable Cast Iron, Processing, Microstructure, and Mechanical Properties 8 15 Compacted Graphite Iron 9 16 Austempered Ductile Cast Iron 9 17 The Metastable Phase Diagram and Stabilized Austenite 9 18 Control of Mechanical Properties of ADI 10 19 Conclusion 10 References 11 Further Reading 11 Cast irons have played an important role in the development of the human species. They have been produced in various compositions for thousands of years. Most often they have been used in the as-cast form to satisfy structural and shape requirements. The mechanical and physical properties of cast irons have been enhanced through understanding of the funda- mental relationships between microstructure (phases, microconstituents, and the distribution of those constituents) and the process variables of iron composition, heat treatment, and the introduction of significant additives in molten metal processing.
    [Show full text]
  • Quantification of the Microstructures of Hypoeutectic White Cast Iron Using
    Quantification of the Microstructures of Hypoeutectic White Cast Iron using Mathematical Morphology and an Artificial Neuronal Network Victor Albuquerque, João Manuel R. S. Tavares, Paulo Cortez Abstract This paper describes an automatic system for segmentation and quantification of the microstructures of white cast iron. Mathematical morphology algorithms are used to segment the microstructures in the input images, which are later identified and quantified by an artificial neuronal network. A new computational system was developed because ordinary software could not segment the microstructures of this cast iron correctly, which is composed of cementite, pearlite and ledeburite. For validation purpose, 30 samples were analyzed. The microstructures of the material in analysis were adequately segmented and quantified, which did not happen when we used ordinary commercial software. Therefore, the proposed system offers researchers, engineers, specialists and others, a valuable and competent tool for automatic and efficient microstructural analysis from images. Keywords: hypoeutectic white cast iron, image processing and analysis, mathematical morphology, artificial neuronal network, image quantification. 1 1. Introduction Cast iron is an iron-carbon-silicon alloy used in numerous industrial applications, such as the base structures of manufacturing machines, rollers, valves, pump bodies and mechanical gears, among others. The main families of cast irons are: nodular cast iron, malleable cast iron, grey cast iron and white cast iron (Callister, 2006). Their properties, as of all materials, are influenced by their microstructures and therefore, the correct characterization of their microstructures is highly important. Thus, quantitative metallography is commonly used to determine the quantity, appearance, size and distribution of the phases and constituents of the white cast iron microstructures.
    [Show full text]
  • Enghandbook.Pdf
    785.392.3017 FAX 785.392.2845 Box 232, Exit 49 G.L. Huyett Expy Minneapolis, KS 67467 ENGINEERING HANDBOOK TECHNICAL INFORMATION STEELMAKING Basic descriptions of making carbon, alloy, stainless, and tool steel p. 4. METALS & ALLOYS Carbon grades, types, and numbering systems; glossary p. 13. Identification factors and composition standards p. 27. CHEMICAL CONTENT This document and the information contained herein is not Quenching, hardening, and other thermal modifications p. 30. HEAT TREATMENT a design standard, design guide or otherwise, but is here TESTING THE HARDNESS OF METALS Types and comparisons; glossary p. 34. solely for the convenience of our customers. For more Comparisons of ductility, stresses; glossary p.41. design assistance MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF METAL contact our plant or consult the Machinery G.L. Huyett’s distinct capabilities; glossary p. 53. Handbook, published MANUFACTURING PROCESSES by Industrial Press Inc., New York. COATING, PLATING & THE COLORING OF METALS Finishes p. 81. CONVERSION CHARTS Imperial and metric p. 84. 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction 3 Steelmaking 4 Metals and Alloys 13 Designations for Chemical Content 27 Designations for Heat Treatment 30 Testing the Hardness of Metals 34 Mechanical Properties of Metal 41 Manufacturing Processes 53 Manufacturing Glossary 57 Conversion Coating, Plating, and the Coloring of Metals 81 Conversion Charts 84 Links and Related Sites 89 Index 90 Box 232 • Exit 49 G.L. Huyett Expressway • Minneapolis, Kansas 67467 785-392-3017 • Fax 785-392-2845 • [email protected] • www.huyett.com INTRODUCTION & ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This document was created based on research and experience of Huyett staff. Invaluable technical information, including statistical data contained in the tables, is from the 26th Edition Machinery Handbook, copyrighted and published in 2000 by Industrial Press, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • EN380 Homework #7 Solution
    EN380 Homework #7 Solution 1. What are the criteria for two metals to form a perfect substitutional alloy (that is, these two will form the same crystal phase at all potential concentrations of each species)? • Atomic radii must not differ by more than 15%. • Crystalline Structure must be the same (BCC and BCC, FCC and FCC, etc.). • No appreciable difference in electronegativity. • Elements should have the same valence state. 2. Sketch a qualitative plot of σY vs % elongation for the following steel microstructures: (a) Ferrite (α) (b) Bainite (c) Martinsite (d) Coarse Pearlite (e) Fine Pearlite 1 3. The phase diagram for iron-iron carbide (F e - F e3C) is shown below. For a 0:95% C steel (i.e. 1095 series) at a temperature just below the eutectoid temperature (727◦C) determine: (a)% C present in the ferrite (α).0 :02% (b)% C present in the cementite (F e3C).6 :67% orange CF e3C −C0 6:67%−0:95% (c) total % of the steel that is ferrite (α). Wα = = = = 86:02% purple+orange CF e3C −Cα 6:67%−0:02% (d) total % of the steel that is cementite (F e3C). purple C0−Cα 0:95%−0:02% WF e3C = = = 13:98% purple+orange CF e3C −Cα 6:67%−0:02% 2 (e) % of steel that is pearlite. This is the same as finding how much austenite, γ, was present just above the eutectoid temper- ature. Draw the tie line just above 727◦C. Cα = 0:02% Cγ = 0:8% green CF e3C − C0 6:67% − 0:95% Wγ = = = = 97:44% red + green CF e3C − Cγ 6:67% − 0:8% (f) % of steel that is proeutectoid ferrite.
    [Show full text]
  • Control Process on the Properties of High-Strength Low Alloy Steel*
    Effect of the ThermoMechanica1-Control Process on the Properties of High-strength Low Alloy Steel* By Hirosh i TAMEHIRO,** Naoomi YAMADA** and Hiroo MATSUDA*** Synopsis tory rolling tests to examine the effect of the process The effect of the Thermo-Mechanical Control Process (TMCP) on conditions. The slabs were cut to 210 mm thick, the properties of high-strength low alloy steel has been examined and the 300 mm wide and 400 mm long and were rolled into following results have been obtained. 25 mm thick plates under various process conditions. The addition of niobium or titanium, especially the combination of The CR conditions adopted for the laboratory tests niobium and boron is effectivefor TMCP. Low-temperature toughness were : heating temperature, 1 150 to 1 200 °C; total of TMCP plate is not significantly influenced by the cooling conditions, but is mainly determined by the controlled-rolling (CR) conditions. rolling reduction below 900 °C, 70 to 75 %; finish TMCP alters the microstructure from ferrite pearlite to fine-grained rolling temperature, in the vicinity of the Ar3 tempera- ferrite-bainite and consequentlyincreases the strength without a loss in ture; cooling rate, 18 to 28 °C/s; finish water-cooling low-temperaturetoughness, compared with CR process. temperature, 410 to 470 °C and plate thickness, 16 The advantagesof TMCP plate are a decreasein the carbon equivalent, to 25 mm. improvementof HIC resistance and an increase in the impact energy. The mechanical properties in the transverse direc- tion were tested on full-thickness tensile and full-size I. Introduction Charpy V-notch impact test specimens taken from With increasingly strict quality requirements for the mid-thickness of the plate and on a Battelle Drop steels used in welded structures, various steel plate Weight Tear Test (BDWTT) specimen.
    [Show full text]
  • Prediction of Microstructure Constituents' Hardness After The
    metals Article Prediction of Microstructure Constituents’ Hardness after the Isothermal Decomposition of Austenite SunˇcanaSmokvina Hanza 1,* , Božo Smoljan 2, Lovro Štic 1 and Krunoslav Hajdek 2 1 Faculty of Engineering, University of Rijeka, Vukovarska 58, 51000 Rijeka, Croatia; [email protected] 2 University Center Koprivnica, University North, Trg dr. Žarka Dolinara 1, 48000 Koprivnica, Croatia; [email protected] (B.S.); [email protected] (K.H.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +385-51-651-475 Abstract: An increase in technical requirements related to the prediction of mechanical properties of steel engineering components requires a deep understanding of relations which exist between microstructure, chemical composition and mechanical properties. This paper is dedicated to the research of the relation between steel hardness with the microstructure, chemical composition and temperature of isothermal decomposition of austenite. When setting the equations for predicting the hardness of microstructure constituents, it was assumed that: (1) The pearlite hardness depends on the carbon content in a steel and on the undercooling below the critical temperature, (2) the martensite hardness depends primarily on its carbon content, (3) the hardness of bainite can be between that of untempered martensite and pearlite in the same steel. The equations for estimation of microstructure constituents’ hardness after the isothermal decomposition of austenite have been proposed. By the comparison of predicted hardness using a mathematical model with experimental results, it can be concluded that hardness of considered low-alloy steels could be successfully predicted by the proposed model. Citation: Smokvina Hanza, S.; Keywords: low-alloy steel; quenching; austenite decomposition; mechanical properties; hardness Smoljan, B.; Štic, L.; Hajdek, K.
    [Show full text]