MARAWI RESPONSE PROJECT (MRP) Quarterly Report 1st Quarter – September 01, 2018 to December 31, 2018

Submission Date: January 31, 2019

Cooperative Agreement Number: 72049218CA00007 Activity Start Date and End Date September 2018 – September 2021

Submitted by: PLAN International Plan USA International Inc. and Plan International 1255 23rd Street, NW, Suite 300 Washington, D.C. 20037

This document was produced for review by the United States Agency for International Development Philippine Mission (USAID/ Philippines).

1 PROJECT OVERVIEW

USAID/PHILIPPINES Program: RESPONSE PROJECT (MRP)

Activity Start Date and End August 29, 2018 – August 28, 2021 Date: Name of Prime Plan USA International Inc. Implementing Partner: Cooperative Agreement 72049218CA00007 Number: Names of Ecosystems Work for Essential Benefits (EcoWeb) and Subcontractors/Sub Marawi People Development Center, Inc. (Maradeca) awardees: Major Counterpart Organizations Geographic Coverage , Marawi City, Lanao del Norte & City (cities and or countries) Reporting Period: September 1, 2018 – December 31, 2018

2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

The Marawi Response Project (MRP) officially started upon the signing of the Cooperative Agreement between the United States Assistance for International Development (USAID) and Plan USA International, Inc. on August 29, 2018. Five days after the signing, Plan immediately launched its Rapid Start-up Plan (RSUP) and deployed the Chief of Party (COP), Deputy Chief of Party (DCOP) and Technical Advisor (TA) to Iligan City. The MRP Program Management Office (MRP-PMO) then began initial coordination with Local Consortium Partners (LCPs) Maradeca and Ecoweb, Government Authorities, USAID Bridge Projects, and Local Government Units (LGUs). The MRP Team was assisted by Plan Philippines’ administrative and finance personnel.

To jumpstart the implementation of projects, the LCPs reached out to 100 barangays (Maradeca 75 and Ecoweb 25) reported to be hosting internally displace persons (IDPs). To facilitate the identification of project priority sites, MRP-PMO and the LCPs adopted the following criteria for selection: a) presence of at least 20 IDP families in the ; b) responsiveness of the barangay officials; and c) level of organization of IDPs based on the LCPs’ interactions with them in these areas.

The IDP and site selection process was done through a series of community consultations and site validation. MRP-PMO also sought inputs from the security sector to determine the municipalities at-risk of violent extremist activities. After the sites were finalized, the LCPs coordinated with LGU officials to conduct project orientations, Community Solidarity Group (CSG) formations, conflict assessments, and project prioritization workshops. Four months into the program, MRP and the LCPs were able to reach a total of 3,601 IDPs and host community members leading to the organization of at least 163 CSGs in the 59 barangays initially covered by the program.

A total of 288 youth IDP and host community members organized themselves into seven (7) all- youth CSGs. Some youth IDP and host community members opted to join CSGs with mixed youth and adult men and women membership.

MRP and the LCPs conducted 16 barangay-level assessments, in which 77 CSGs participated. For the same period, MRP and the LCPs were able to conduct 85 prioritization workshops that generated a list of 287 potential community projects comprised of 159 livelihood and 128 community projects that will foster social cohesion among IDPs and host communities. Seventy- one (71) concept notes have been developed by the CSGs with assistance from MRP.

To strengthen the Marawi business climate, MRP connected with about 220 businesspersons invited by the Bangon Marawi Chamber of Commerce Inc. One hundred eighty-eight (188) of these businesspersons were validated by Maradeca and a majority of them comprised the first batch of business recovery grant applicants chosen under the RSUP targets in the coming quarter.

3 CONTENTS

PROJECT Overview ...... 2

Executive Summary ...... 3

CONTENTS ...... 4

ACRONYMS ...... 6

1. Introduction ...... 7 1.1 Scope of the Report ...... 7 1.2 Project Overview ...... 7

2. Activities Targeted for the Period ...... 7 2.1 Objectives of the Rapid Start Up Plan ...... 7 2.2 Initial Project Sites ...... 8

3. Summary of Accomplishments ...... 9 3.1 MRP Launch ...... 9 3.2 RSUP Objective 1 ...... 9 3.2.1 Mobilization ...... 9 3.2.2 Establishment of Iligan City Office ...... 10 3.2.3 Project Team Mobilization and Hiring of Personnel ...... 10 3.2.4 Planning ...... 10 3.2.5 Coordination ...... 10 3.3 RSUP Objective 2 ...... 11 3.3.1 Preparations for the Formation of CSGs ...... 12 3.3.1 Formation of Community Solidarity Groups (CSGs) ...... 14 3.3.2 Conflict Assessments ...... 15 3.3.3 Project Prioritization Workshops ...... 16 3.3.4 Projects and Initial Proposals Submitted as of December 2018 ...... 17 3.4 Preparation to Support Business Recovery ...... 18 3.5 Preparation to Support Women in Peacebuilding Initiatives ...... 18 3.6 Preparation to Support Youth in Peacebuilding Initiatives ...... 19 3.7 Immediate support to IDPs ...... 20

4 4. Field Monitoring ...... 21

5. Implementation Challenges ...... 21 5.1 Management and Administrative Issues ...... 22 5.2 Field Operations ...... 22 5.3 Ensuring Compliance with USAID Regulations ...... 23

6. Lessons Learned ...... 23

7. Planned Activities for the Next Quarter ...... 24

8. Financial Management...... 24

5 ACRONYMS

AIP Annual Implementation Plan AMELP Activity Monitoring and Evaluation Plan APCES Amai Pakpak Central Elementary School BMCCI Bangon Marawi Chamber of Commerce and Industry BMP Branding and Marking Plan CO Country Office COP Chief of Party CSG Community Solidarity Group DCOP Deputy Chief of Party EC Evacuation Center ECOWEB Ecosystems Work for Essential Benefits EMMP Environmental Mitigation and Management Plan FGD Focus Group Discussion GAP Gender Action Plan IDP Internally displaced person IR Intermediate result LCP Local Consortium Partners LDN Lanao del Norte LDS Lanao del Sur LGU Local Government Unit MERL Monitoring, evaluation, research and learning MAA Marawi’s most affected area MARADECA Maranao People Development Center, Inc. MRP Marawi Response Project MRP-PMO Marawi Response Project-Project Management Office NGO Non-Governmental Organization OCHA Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Assistance OFDA USAID’s Office of U.S. Foreign Disaster Assistance OSY Out-of-school youth P&R Pause and Reflect Session PCCI Philippine Chamber of Commerce and Industry PO Purchase Order PVE Preventing violent extremism PYD Positive youth development RSUP Rapid Start Up Plan SCLR Survivor and community-led response STTA Short-term Technical Assistance SURGE Strengthening Urban Resilience for Growth with Equity TA Technical Advisor TESDA Technical Education and Skills Development Authority TFBM Task Force Bangon Marawi TVET Technical and vocational education and training UN United Nations UNDP United Nations Development Program USAID United States Agency for International Development USG United States Government VE Violent Extremist YSEALI Young Southeast Asian Leaders Initiative

6 1. INTRODUCTION

1.1 Scope of the Report

In accordance with the subject Cooperative Agreement (Section A.6, 1.c, Quarterly Performance Reports) this Quarterly Report covers the period October-December 2018, but includes activities in the month of September 2018. Project implementation during this reporting period was guided by the Rapid Start up Plan (RSUP) approved by USAID on September 26, 2018. The accomplishments and updates in this report are assessed principally against the performance targets defined in the RSUP.

1.2 Project Overview

The overall goal of MRP is to increase opportunities for individuals and communities affected by the Marawi siege to actively contribute to advancing durable solutions in a manner that reduces the threat of violent extremism. To achieve this purpose, MRP will accomplish two Intermediate Results (IR), namely: a) Improved economic conditions of Internally Displaced Persons (IDPs) and host communities, and; b) Strengthened community cohesion in communities hosting large numbers of IDPs.

2. ACTIVITIES TARGETED FOR THE PERIOD 2.1 Objectives of the Rapid Start Up Plan

The two objectives of the Rapid Start-Up Plan are:

1. To establish the MRP field office in Iligan City, mobilize the implementing teams at Plan USA and Plan Philippines, and hire of all key personnel; and

2. Submission and review of initial proposals developed by community solidarity groups (CSGs) and local Marawi business associations, some of which may receive future funds under the MRP grants component.

While no numeric targets were set for the period, expected outcomes were defined in the RSUP. As stipulated in the RSUP, “By the end of the first 90 days, the MRP office in Iligan City and the implementing teams at Plan USA and Plan Philippines shall be organized, with the office in Iligan City furnished and equipped.” The start-up period was intended to “allow MRP to test certain methods and processes before large-scale roll-out and adapt as needed to any challenges or constraints”.

Under Objective 1, specific activities planned in the RSUP included mobilizing Plan staff, establishing the Iligan City office, hiring key personnel, drafting and submitting start-up deliverables, coordinating meetings with USAID and other IPs, and initiating MRP research activities. In support of Objective 2, planned activities included forming Community Solidarity Groups (CSGs) which would identify priority projects and develop initial community proposals, identifying businesses needing assistance for recovery, and designing specific interventions to address the needs of IDPs, as well as women and youth specifically. Please see Annex 1 for details.

7 The RSUP was designed to position MRP to quickly provide assistance to IDPs and host communities once the Grants Manual and Annual Implementation Plan are approved by USAID. 2.2 Initial Project Sites

Under Objective 2 of the RSUP, CSGs were to be organized in the municipalities of , , , , , , Iligan City, , Baloi, Salvador, Linamon and . The municipalities of Salvador and Linamon were later dropped because the number of IDPs were fewer than expected. However, the LCPs requested to cover barangays in , Buadiposo Buntong and Pantar following field validations conducted revealed high concentrations of IDPs in those municipalities.

The LCPs (Maradeca and EcoWeb) agreed to the following allocation of sites, illustrated in the map below:

Maradeca: Saguiaran, Marantao, Bubong, Puna Bayabao, Lumbayanague and Buadiposo Buntong. EcoWeb: Iligan City, Baloi, Munai, Pantar, Pantau Ragat, Butig and Kapai.

8 3. SUMMARY OF ACCOMPLISHMENTS

This section details MRP’s accomplishments during the first quarter, specifically in achieving the objectives of the RSUP. This is also summarized in tables in Annex 1.

3.1 MRP Launch

On October 16, 2018, MRP helped organize the MRP Project launching by His Excellency, US Ambassador to the Philippines Sung Kim at the Amai Pakpak Central Elementary School (APCES) in Marawi City. The event was witnessed by local officials and more than 3,000 elementary pupils and school teachers. At that event, the Ambassador launched the Marawi Response Project. He was joined by USAID Mission Director Lawrence Hardy II and other USAID officers and staff.

(Left photo) USG Ambassador to the Philippines Sung Kim during the symbolic handover of reading materials to the Department of Education and Amai Pakpak Central Elementary School (APCES). (Right photo) Students listen intently during a read-along activity in a classroom at APCES.

3.2 RSUP Objective 1

Under the RSUP, MRP’s first objective was to establish the MRP field office in Iligan City, mobilize the implementing teams at Plan USA and Plan Philippines, and hire of all key personnel. MRP’s progress toward achieving that objective is detailed below: 3.2.1 Mobilization

PLAN USA and PLAN Philippines began mobilizing MRP in September 2018. Over the reporting period, PLAN USA fielded a total of seven (7) staff/consultants to help prepare key deliverables. PLAN Philippines provided a team of administrative personnel to help MRP personnel set up the office in Iligan City. That team stayed in Iligan for almost a month, helping with the search for office space, setting up the temporary office, and installing PLAN financial and administrative systems in Iligan.

9 3.2.2 Establishment of Iligan City Office

The MRP-Project Management Office (PMO) established a temporary office in Iligan City. It continues to serve as a temporary office for MRP.

With the assistance from local network associates, a mapping of available office space was conducted numbering about 7 prospective respectable office facilities. MRP-PMO signed a lease for its permanent office in Iligan City. The permanent office needs repair and is expected to be ready for occupancy by early March 2019. A market determined tender procurement process was employed to ensure fair price competition among local suppliers for the refurbishment of the space.

Some laptops and other office equipment and furniture have been purchased for use by the staff and key personnel. 3.2.3 Project Team Mobilization and Hiring of Personnel

MRP has five key personnel. Of these, the Chief of Party, Deputy Chief of Party, and the Grants Manager have been hired. Candidates for Procurement Manager and the Finance Manager have been selected and are undergoing final evaluation. Their appointments are expected to be endorsed for USAID approval in February 2019.

The MRP-PMO has a manpower complement of forty-four (44) personnel. As of the end of December, nineteen (19) personnel have been hired. Seventeen (17) have been screened and/or selected, including the two (2) key personnel mentioned earlier. The search for the remaining eight positions continues. 3.2.4 Planning

In addition to the MRP Grants Manual, Annual Implementation Plan (AIP), Activity Monitoring, Evaluation & Learning Plan (AMELP), MRP also prepared and submitted the Gender Action (GAP) Plan, Environmental Mitigation and Management (EMMP) Plan, and Branding and Marking Plan (BMP). The drafts of these important plans/documents were submitted for review by USAID. A Communications Strategy was also drafted and will be submitted to USAID in the next quarter. The GAP, EMMP and the BMP were incorporated into the Annual Implementation Plan (AIP). 3.2.5 Coordination

During the first quarter of operations, MRP-PMO paid courtesy visits to, and coordinated with Government Authorities, Local Government Unit (LGU) Chief Executives and Regional Government Agencies. Those visited were the Provincial Governors and other officials of Lanao del Sur and Lanao del Norte, the Mayors of Marawi and Iligan cities, and Task Force Bangon Marawi. At least one official of all barangays visited by the Partners was contacted. In many cases, barangay officials were present in CSG activities, especially in project prioritization workshops.

MRP consulted closely with key USAID Bridge projects, the various United Nations Agency-field offices and other organizations with strong presence in the Marawi Area. These coordination meetings resulted in better targeting of Rapid Start Up project sites, access to important

10 information needed for field planning and general situational and contextual knowledge of the Marawi Area.

In finalizing the criteria for the selection of project sites, MRP-PMO sought inputs from the security sector to determine the municipalities at risk of violent extremist activities. MRP also sought security advisories and information from them on a regular basis to ensure the security and safety of all project staff and assets moving in and around the project sites.

Community workshops were conducted in the municipalities of Balo-i, Lanao del Norte and Saguiaran, Lanao del Sur.

3.3 RSUP Objective 2

MRP’s second objective was to submit and review initial proposals developed by community solidarity groups (CSGs) and local Marawi business associations, some of which may receive future funds under the MRP grants component.

The expected outcome of objective 2 is to position MRP to achieve early wins, which includes providing the experience and the opportunity to prepare for the more extensive work of supporting IDPs and their host communities as well as the business sector, address their displacements and its concomitant consequences. Overall the activities conducted in this quarter provided sufficient basis for improving methods and mindsets needed to achieve the project’s objectives. During that period, MRP-PMO and the LCPs have agreed on the overall process of forming and engaging CSGs. That process with some updates, is currently reflected in the Grants Manual. Furthermore, during that period, some established and some new methods were applied to (a) organize CSGs, (b) select sites, (c) encourage the cooperation of local officials, (d) conduct conflict assessments, (e) conduct participatory workshops, and (f) prepare project proposals.

That experience has resulted in the identification of projects eligible for MRP assistance, while providing MRP with valuable insights into how to effectively work with the IDPs, host communities and business groups.

MRP’s progress toward achieving this objective is detailed below:

11 3.3.1 Preparations for the Formation of CSGs

The formation of CSGs began with a planning activity held on September 4, 2018 with facilitators and team leaders from EcoWeb and Maradeca. At the event, MRP and the LCPs agreed on the sites (listed in Section 2.2) and an initial target of community solidarity groups to be formed or revived.

Field work to organize CSGs commenced in early October once the RSUP was approved. This began with consultations with barangay officials and municipalities, gathering information on IDPs and their host communities. In mid-October, MRP held a meeting with the LCPs to discuss developments in the field. In that meeting, participants agreed that a single process of forming CSGs should be used. Subsequent meetings in late October and early November resulted in a single procedure that is reflected in the draft Grants Manual (see Figure 1 of the draft Grants Manual). While this process was to be followed uniformly, “event” processes would be left to the LCPs, allowing them to use their own organizational methods.

In this series of workshops, MRP-PMO and the LCPs discussed and agreed on the processes and methodologies to be followed in generating community grant proposals -- from community consultations, CSG organizing, participatory project prioritization workshops, concept note development to full proposal writing.

Maradeca however expressed openness to guidance on designing and managing participatory events. The MRP Team designed two events for Maradeca: (a) a workshop assessing “typical” projects of CSGs, and (b) a project prioritization workshop. The latter was designed in a way that livelihood, social cohesion and small community infrastructure projects could be captured by the suggested participatory process. Maradeca continued to use its own community rapid appraisal and conflict assessment methods.

12 Maradeca planned pilot events for project prioritization workshops before roll-out and tested alternative methods of organizing these workshops. One method was to conduct it by CSG, which yielded un-remarkable results and ideas. Another was to conduct the workshop by barangay, with all CSGs participating. The joint team that tested the method unanimously agreed to adopt the barangay-level (Nanagun, Lumbayanague), combined-CSGs workshop. They agreed that prioritization workshops with multi-stakeholder participants yielded community priorities on both economic development/livelihood and social cohesion including community facilities.

Table 1 below presents the series of consultations, meetings and pilot tests of event designs conducted to form and mobilize CSGs and identify and prioritize projects.

Table 1: MRP-LCP Orientation and Workshops Conducted and/or Participated

Activity Title Participants Activity Description Date Conducted

First meeting with the LCPs to MRP/Plan, MARADECA – Orientation and levelling-off prepare activity plan and agree Sep 5, 2018 Team & ECOWEB Team of expectations on sites. MRP/Plan, Plan CO – Plan- Work Planning Session with USNO, MARADECA – Detailed Activity Planning Sep 19, 2018 LCPs Team & ECOWEB Team 1.) Generate activity MARADECA & ECOWEB updates and discuss Field Implementation Team constraints to field Workshop to Align Field Members activities; 2.) Review the October 22-23, 2018 Operations Activities LCPs’ activity targets; and, MRP – Team 3.) Explore standardization of processes and formats. Workshop with CSG leaders to come-up with an indicative list of supplies, November 13, 2018 – LCPs & MRP Team as co- materials, equipment based Bubong, LDS; Logistics Needs Assessment facilitators on their community Marantao, LDS Workshop priorities. November 14, 2018 – CSG leaders as participants Brgys Tomas Cabili & Inputs to the proposed Mahayahay, Iligan City supplier’s forum and advanced vetting. 16 MARADECA Field Workshop on Participatory Implementation Team Development of the November 15, 2018 – Project Prioritization Members Participatory Prioritization Iligan City Approaches methods and tools MRP Team

This writeshop was MARADECA & ECOWEB intended to set the MRP Project Concept Note and December 11-12, Field Implementation Team standard format for Project Project Proposal Writeshop 2018 Members Concept Notes and Grant Proposals.

13 3.3.1 Formation of Community Solidarity Groups (CSGs)

In October 2018, MRP reached out to 1001 barangays, of which 592 were given priority. The prioritization was done by the community development facilitators of the LCPs who visited these barangays. The criteria used for prioritization were: (a) presence of at least 20 IDP families in the barangay; (b) responsiveness of the barangay officials; and (c) level of organization of IDPs based on the LCPs’ experience.

As of December 2018, MRP had organized 3,601 IDPs and host family/community members into 1633 Community Solidarity Groups (CSGs) in the 59 barangays (Table 2). Seventy-two (72%) percent of the organized CSG members (2,579 individuals) are IDPs, with the rest being host family/ community members. Sixty-one (61%) percent of CSG members or 2,197 individuals are women.

CSGS ORGANIZED CSG MEMBERSHIP BY STATUS # of CSGs with submitted Host concept notes Community 30% Members 28%

# of CSGs IDPs organized 72% 70%

IDP WOMEN'S PARTICIPATION IN HOST COMMUNITY'S WOMEN CSG'S PARTICIPATION IN CSGS

Male Male 39% 40%

Female Female 61% 60%

1 Maradeca visited 75 barangays, its officials and IDP leaders while Ecoweb visited 25. 2 Maradeca held community orientations in 34 barangays while Ecoweb followed up in all 25 barangays. 3 See Annexes 7 and 9, for LCPs’ CSG Information Summaries.

14 Table 2: Number of Barangays with CSGs

Municipality/City Province Number Number of Number of Number of of Barangays CSGs CSG Barangays with CSGs Members Covered Buadiposo Buntong Lanao del Sur 7 1 2 136 Bubong Lanao del Sur 7 1 3 71 Ditsaan Ramain Lanao del Sur 5 1 3 180 Lumbayanague Lanao del Sur 2 2 8 479 Marantao Lanao del Sur 4 2 6 269 Poona Bayabao Lanao del Sur 2 1 5 126 Saguiaran Lanao del Sur 3 1 5 179 Lanao del Sur 4 1 3 282 Iligan City Lanao del Norte 11 11 72 864 Baloi Lanao del Norte 3 3 7 101 Pantao Ragat Lanao del Norte 4 4 4 87 Pantar Lanao del Norte 3 3 5 94 Kapai Lanao del Sur 1 1 1 21 Butig Lanao del Sur 3 3 39 712 TOTAL 59 35 163 3,601

3.3.2 Conflict Assessments

Using their respective conflict assessment tools, Maradeca and Ecoweb, conducted assessments in 18 barangays. The conflict assessment report is used to complete the Do-No-Harm checklist which is required by the municipality/city (Annex 4). Results of the conflict assessments conducted by Maradeca and Ecoweb will be assessed after the first batch of projects have been generated to check its effectiveness, and if necessary, agree on standard formats and tools for the two LCPs on succeeding batches of projects.

Table 3: Barangays in which Conflict Assessments Were Conducted

Municipality Barangay Marantao, LDS Ragayan Marantao, LDS Tacub Pindolonan Saguiaran, LDS Covered Court Evacuation Center Ditsaan Ramain, LDS Polo Bubong, LDS Pagayonan Buadiposo Buntong, LDS Bubong Poona Bayabao, LDS Cadayonan Lumbayanague, LDS Nanagun Iligan City Tambacan Iligan City Tomas Cabili Iligan City Ubaldo Laya Iligan City Mahayahay Baloi, LDN Matampay Kapai, LDS Pindolonan Butig, LDS Sandab Butig, LDS Bayabao

15 3.3.3 Project Prioritization Workshops

As of December 2018, 85 CSGs have conducted project prioritization workshops. The workshops were originally intended to be held by CSG. However, the design was modified in a way that all CSGs hold one workshop with the community and with barangay officials. In this manner, the involvement of barangay officials and non-IDP community members ensures that social cohesion projects are also prioritized and proposed. Details on the location of the CSGs that have conducted the workshops are in Annexes 7 and 9.

Each prioritization workshop consists of the following steps:

The following process was followed by Maradeca:  Current reality dialogue: The participants describe the situation in the barangay, particularly as it affects IDPs and their host families.  Assessment of access to support: The facilitator asks the participants to describe the assistance they have received and from where, and that which they expect to receive in the very near future.  Articulating their plans to address their displacement: The participants discuss their plans to address their displacement and how they intend to carry these out.  Assessment of constraints to achieving their plans: The participants identify and discuss the more serious issues that impede the achievement of their plans to either end or mitigate their displacement.  Identifying activities or projects that will help the IDPs fulfill their plans: The participants identify projects or activities that will help them to achieve their plans.  Identifying projects needed by the community to address its needs as well as those of the IDPs.  Prioritizing the identified activities or projects.

(Top and Middle rows) MRP, together with LCPs conducted Prioritization Workshops in various barangays in the areas covered by the project. (Bottom Row) IDPs, residents and members of the LGU in a workshop with MRP’s Social Cohesion Lead in Butig, Lanao del Sur.

16

Ecoweb followed the Survivor & Community Led Response (SCLR) in Community-Based Project Prioritization process:  Self-definition: Ecoweb uses an Identity Checklist, a tool where the identities of each of the participants are recorded. This tool is being used to determine what identities (e.g. civil status, gender, age range, profession or livelihood in Marawi City) are represented by the group members and what are the most dominant. These identities are likely to influence the group as the interest of these identities will likely motivate the members. The common identities will also serve as the foundation in building cohesion and unity of the group essential to their livelihood plans and activities.  Visioning: The participants are required to visualize the kind of community they want to see in the next five years. All CSG members were guided to take part in brainstorming to express their objectives, outlooks and platforms for the kind of future they want for themselves and their respective communities.  Prioritizing projects: Before the participants start on their activity on prioritizing and planning appropriate actions, they are given 1 hour and 30 minutes to discuss within the group the priority projects that they would like to establish. With this, they will be able to brainstorm and discuss among the groups the common interest which will lead them in identifying their final livelihood or social cohesion projects.  Roadmapping to the future: Each group is given manila papers and markers. The main facilitator instructs the participants that each group should make a road map and list down priority actions that will help in building social cohesion and improving or establishing livelihood priorities while transitioning from their present location (host community) to the future location (in this case, Marawi City or other place of their choice). 3.3.4 Projects and Initial Proposals Submitted as of December 2018

For the community grants, CSGs identified a total of 287 projects during the project identification workshops. Of these, 159 are livelihood projects and 128 are projects aimed at fostering social cohesion. The latter include community infrastructure. Details are presented in Annex 10.

Of the 287 projects identified, 71 projects or activities were prioritized for submission to MRP, including 55 livelihood proposals and 16 for improving relations between the IDPs and host communities or enhancing the capacity of the barangay governments to provide services (social cohesion). While priorities varied across barangays, common projects include support to sari sari stores, rice dealers, and dress making under livelihoods, Islamic seminars, CSG training, and peacebuilding training under social cohesion, and street lights and water pumps under

17 community infrastructure. Details on the barangays and CSGs that identified these projects may be seen in Annexes 7 and 9.

Under the draft Grants Manual, the CSGs submit their proposals as concept notes using the template contained in the Grants Manual. As of the end of December 2018, concept notes for all 71 projects have been submitted to the MRP-PMO. Information about these concept notes can be seen in Annexes 7 and 9. 3.4 Preparation to Support Business Recovery

MRP-PMO supported the Bangon Marawi Chamber of Commerce and Industry (BMCCI) in hosting a Business Recovery Conference in November 20, 2018. Through the conference MRP connected with about 220 businesspersons invited by the BMCCI. Of those invited, 197 were interviewed by facilitators provided by Maradeca for the purpose. The interviews became the basis for field validation by Maradeca to check the veracity of information provided. A total of one hundred eighty-eight (188) businesspersons were validated by Maradeca. Nine (9) were dropped from the list after Maradeca field validators failed to locate the addresses and discovered that they had moved to different locations, including Manila. A second conference to discuss their business recovery proposals was scheduled for January 2019.

From the validated list, the first batch of business recovery grant applicants will be chosen under the RSUP targets in the coming quarter. The table below shows the sex-disaggregated list of business persons by current location.

Table 4: Businesspersons Interviewed by Stated Address

Current Location Sex Total Male Female Marantao, LDS 22 12 34 Wato Balindon, LDS 1 2 3 Taraka, LDS 1 2 3 Pantar, LDS 3 3 Iligan City 14 16 30 Saguiaran, LDS 2 2 Baloi, LDN 1 1 2 Mulondo LDS 1 5 6 Cagayan de Oro City 7 3 10 Lumba Bayabao LDS 1 1 Buadiposo Buntong LDS 1 1 Bubong LDS 1 1 Marawi City 36 56 92 Total 80 101 188

3.5 Preparation to Support Women in Peacebuilding Initiatives

MRP adopted mechanisms to ensure that women will be heard in community consultations and decision-making process and will have an equal opportunity with men in accessing funds from the MRP grant system. One of these mechanisms to ensure that women are heard is the organization of all-women Community Solidarity Groups (CSGs).

18 To date, data on beneficiaries reached and engaged have a total of 2,197 women engaged in community consultations, CSG organizing, conflict assessments, prioritization workshops and developing project concept notes. The figure represents 61% of the total IDPs and host communities directly engaged by the project, as shown in Table 5 below.

From a gender programming perspective, men and women were given the choice to organize among themselves. As a result, of the 71 community grant projects developed into concept notes, 16 are women-led while more than 7 have strong women participation in terms of roles. On the other hand, 12 CSGs were all-men and the remaining 44 CSGs are composed of mixed men and women. For the business recovery projects, 101 (or almost 54%) of the 188 businesspersons who expressed interest in business recovery support, are women.

Table 5: Number of Women Directly Engaged by MRP

CSG Members % of Location LCP Total Male Female Women Baloi, Lanao del Norte Ecoweb 66 35 101 65% Butig, Lanao del Sur Ecoweb 254 458 712 64% Iligan City Ecoweb 362 502 864 58% Kapai, Lanao del Sur Ecoweb 6 15 21 71% Pantao Ragat, Lanao del Sur Ecoweb 35 52 87 60% Pantar, Lanao del Sur Ecoweb 34 60 94 64% Total 726 1,153 1,879 61% Buadiposo Buntong, Lanao del Sur Maradeca 51 85 136 63% Bubong, Lanao del Sur Maradeca 34 37 71 52% Ditsaan Ramain, Lanao del Sur Maradeca 69 111 180 62% Lumbayanague, Lanao del Sur Maradeca 191 288 479 60% Marantao, Lanao del Sur Maradeca 102 167 269 62% Poona Bayabao, Lanao del Sur Maradeca 62 64 126 51% Saguiaran, Lanao del Sur Maradeca 72 107 179 60% Tugaya, Lanao del Sur Maradeca 97 185 282 66% Total 678 1,044 1,722 61% Over-all Total 1,404 2,197 3,601 61%

3.6 Preparation to Support Youth in Peacebuilding Initiatives

MRP applies the USAID Positive Youth Development (PYD)4 approach in programming to engage youth (both IDPs and hosts) in the rehabilitation effort. MRP’s interventions and activities for youth will be designed with them, and will be directed towards improving their assets, agency, contribution and the enabling environment for youth to actively participate in the Marawi rehabilitation and in community peace building and development efforts.

In the first four months of MRP operations, the youth sectors were involved in the community consultations, CSG organizing, conflict assessments, and participatory project prioritization workshops.

A sectoral approach to youth was also tested in identifying issues that matter to them. In September 17, 2018, seven young leaders (either IDPs or hosts) and members of Young

4 Positive Youth Development (PYD) engages youth along with their families, communities and/or governments so that youth are empowered to reach their full potential. PYD approaches build skills, assets and competencies; foster healthy relationships; strengthen the environment; and transform systems. (USAID, PYD Measurement Toolkit)

19 Southeast Asian Leaders Initiative (YSEALI) participated in the Focus Group Discussions (FGD) facilitated by MRP.

At the FGD, the youth shared their thoughts on the plight of IDP students.5 The FGD participants’ estimate that the Mindanao State University has 8,300 students comprised of Elementary, High School, Senior High School and College. As per the youth estimates, approximately 50% - 60% of the students are IDPs.

The FGD participants came up with a list of possible projects that will help address current vulnerabilities of IDP students, namely:

1. Establishment of a mini library hub at the evacuation centers 2. Youth Arts and Cultural Heritage Promotion 3. Support to Organic Farming & Marketing 4. Scholarship offerings with Community Service 5. Recreational Activities for Stress Management 6. Trauma healing: Psycho-social interventions

The above proposed interventions are now being considered as potential thematic areas for youth CSGs to develop and implement social cohesion project proposals targeting the youth sector. MRP conducted an FGD with IDP Student Youth Groups are also active in CSG activities. leaders on November 17, 2018. Seven young leaders, mostly members of Young Southeast They have developed 7 projects that are currently Asian Leaders Initiative (YSEALI) shared their under consideration by MRP for possible grant thoughts and ideas on youth-oriented programs support. While 4 of the 7 are livelihood activities and needs. (computer shop/services), three are expected to benefit communities: sports festivals, cultural festivals and small community infrastructure (installation of solar-powered lights). 3.7 Immediate support to IDPs

MRP had identified specific interventions to address urgent needs of IDPs in two evacuation centers: (a) Saguiaran (Covered Court and People’s Park) and (b) Poona Bayabao. A rice retailing store and a general merchandise grocery were identified as priorities during the CSG workshops for these two major evacuation centers. Based on the concept notes developed, project proposals for grants assistance are now being prepared.

5 The invited youth leaders defined IDP students as those students staying in the tent cities and dormitories, non- Muslims and former working students from the Most Affected Areas (MAAs) and are now staying with friends.

20 4. FIELD MONITORING

Field monitoring of LCPs’ activities were undertaken as follows:

 Staff should be in at least one activity involving a CSG, of a barangay;  At least 25% of barangays with CSGs should have been subject of MRP-PMO field monitoring;  The activity to be monitored should have been organized by the LCP.

Monitoring activities commenced in September and continued through December. The intention was to cover at least nine barangays, representing 25% of the total 35 barangays (as of November 2018) in which CSGs had already been organized. The table below details the monitoring efforts conducted by MRP in this reporting period.

Table 6: Field Monitoring of LCP Activities

Barangay/ Activity Monitored Partner Date Municipality 1. Project Identification Meeting Brgy. Mahayahay, ECOWEB Dec 13, 2018 with CSGs Iligan City Cadayonan, 2. Project Prioritization Workshop MARADECA Nov 23, 2018 Poona Bayabao Nanagun, 3. Project Prioritization Workshop MARADECA Nov 22, 2018 Lumbayanague 4. Assessment of Classification of Ragayan, MARADECA Nov 13, 2018 Projects Likely to be Proposed Marantao 5. Assessment of Classification of Pagayonan, MARADECA Nov 13, 2018 Projects Likely to be Proposed Bubong 6. Assessment of Classification of Tomas Cabili, ECOWEB Nov 14, 2018 Projects Likely to be Proposed Iligan City 7. Assessment of Classification of Mahayahay, Iligan ECOWEB Nov 14, 2018 Projects Likely to be Proposed City 8. Light Touch Gender Community People’s Plaza, MARADECA Sep 21, 2018 Workshop Saguiaran 9. Light Touch Gender Community Balo-I, Lanao del ECOWEB Sep 20, 2018 Workshop Norte

5. IMPLEMENTATION CHALLENGES

The period from September 3 through early December 2018 was particularly difficult. The project team had to develop multiple deliverables while simultaneously setting up systems to ensure that the Rapid Start Up objectives were met. More specifically, the team had to organize the LCPs for RSUP tasks that included preparing for field operations, organizing CSGs and generating proposals for grant assistance by December. During this period, MRP’s Iligan office was manned by only six technical personnel and a driver.

21 5.1 Management and Administrative Issues

Project Staff Recruitment. Following Plan International’s human resource policy of open competition to solicit interested technical and administrative experts, recruitment gained wide circulation. However, the negative perception of security in the MRP covered areas prompted a number of potential candidates to withdraw their applications. The Recruitment Team worked through their established professional networks but the process is taking longer than projected.

Grant Proposal Development. The delays in recruitment have been particularly challenging as it relates to grant proposal development. As outlined in the MRP Grants Manual, Concept Notes are expanded into full grant proposals by the MRP-assigned Grants Officers/Assistants and Finance Officers/Assistants, with the assistance of the concerned LCP-CDFs and CDMs. However, due to the delayed hiring of some MRP-PMO Grants and Finance Assistants, an ad hoc team of MRP technical personnel, complemented by staff from PLAN CO, and Maradeca and EcoWeb staff had to work together to meet the RSUP target proposals for completion.

The hiring of Grants and Finance Officers and Assistants is a priority issue to be addressed in the coming quarter. With the anticipated volume of proposals to be completed (at least 60 per month) there may be a need to hire more skilled grant proposal writers. There is also the need to develop proposal writing capacities of the LCPs.

Identification of Project Management Office Space. The increased number of international and local NGOs aiding in the Marawi rehabilitation has resulted in a shortage of available office spaces in Iligan City. This also prompted an increase in rental costs within the Iligan City area and its environs. Identification was made more stringent since MRP employed an ethical and transparent procurement process, thus shortening the already short list of available office spaces available

Procurement for start-up. Considering Marawi’s unstable economic climate, the standard USG procurement practices are considered arduous by local suppliers. This has discouraged some accredited suppliers to bid on needed services and supplies, especially for small purchases, resulting in procurement delays for basic office equipment, office supplies, and venues and facilities for fora and training. 5.2 Field Operations

At the onset of project implementation, the LCPs identified five key constraints in field operations, namely:

1. Limited LGU knowledge/data on IDP situation. This is manifested by the lack of updated information of IDPs at the barangay level. 2. Lack of reliable data on IDPs. Government agencies and NGOs generating IDP data are having difficulties catching up with IDP movements on the ground, making the data less reliable for programming and targeting purposes. 3. Difficulty to organize IDPs for consultations. Working IDP family members are always out looking for potential sources of income. Community meetings and consultations need prior arrangements to ensure maximum community participation. 4. Increasing expectations from aid programs. Community needs are increasing while support is decreasing, which has caused frustration and increasing expectations from aid programs.

22 5. Fluid environment. There have been instances where organized IDP CSGs have moved out of areas that were already validated. As such, LCPs need to keep up with the fast- changing implementation environment. This is part of the adaptive management approach described in the Project Description.

These issues are being addressed at the field level by the community facilitators and their development managers (area managers). Further sharing sessions on experience and skills planned for the next quarter are also expected to help address the issues raised.

The preparation of this quarterly report revealed weaknesses in the LCPs’ systems for facilitation and documentation of events and project proposal development. MRP plans to make February 2019 a month of capacity building for the LCPs, helping them to tighten their processes and methods to make their field work more systematic. MRP will also provide hands- on training and mentoring to LCP field and technical staff to ensure that the outputs are within the desired quality and standard. 5.3 Ensuring Compliance with USAID Regulations

The MRP-PMO has identified a number of USAID regulations that need to be satisfied prior to procurement of grant-funded commodities, services and equipment. These regulations include those related to the purchase of restricted agricultural commodities and clearances for projects falling under Category 2 environmental threshold. In order to ensure compliance with these regulations without unduly delaying procurement, the team has begun detailing specific requirements for individual approvals and clearances.

6. LESSONS LEARNED

As the project moves past the RSUP into full implementation, some lessons learned will be important to apply moving forward:

1. There is a need to further clarify roles and arrangements on the preparation and finalization of community grant proposals between the MRP-PMO and the LCPs in order to expedite the processing of proposals; 2. Further training of the LCPs is needed to improve the grant development process. In particular, the LCPs seem to need additional support in the area of compliance and reviewing the required attachments to the project proposals for grant assistance. There is also the need to provide the LCPs with a detailed activity process flow chart, with an established timeline of the proposal preparation process; 3. In the context of IR2, relatively few community improvement and social cohesion projects have been proposed, with understandably more requests for immediate needs related to livelihoods. Field visits and discussions with CSG members indicate that there is a need to explain the importance of social cohesion and community improvement projects to achieve MRP’s objectives. EcoWeb has tended to limit one proposal for each CSG. This misunderstanding needs to be resolved. It is recommended that each CSG be encouraged to submit one distinct proposal for livelihood, social cohesion, and community improvement as is being done by Maradeca. MRP will hold a Pause and Reflect Workshop

23 with Maradeca and EcoWeb to discuss the utilization of a single approach to facilitating proposals from CSGs. 4. The review of project proposals focused on commodities requiring expertise in the areas of engineering, agriculture, baking, dressmaking, culture and the arts etc. Where there is a need for this expertise, the project suggests to employ the services of experts in these areas. They can be hired temporarily through STTAs or POs.

7. PLANNED ACTIVITIES FOR THE NEXT QUARTER

Community Grants. Approval and awarding of the first batch of fifty (50) community/micro grants to CSGs and twenty (20) business recovery grants in January 2019. The team is targeting the award of at least 150 new community/micro and business recovery grants in the 2nd quarter of the program (February – April 2019).

Pause and Reflect Session (P&R). A Pause & Reflect Session meeting with the LCPs, program key personnel, Plan Philippines Country Office, Plan US National Office and USAID. The P&R will focus on the CSG organizing process, Conflict Assessment Process, Participatory Project Prioritization Workshop Process, Concept Note Development Process and Methods and Arrangements, Grant Proposal Writing Process and Arrangement.

Training and Refresher Workshop. Conduct training and refresher on grants proposal writing for both MRP-PMO and LCP grants writers.

Youth Summit. Conduct Youth Summit for IDP and host community youth leaders from Lanao del Sur, Lanao del Norte, and Iligan.

Suppliers Forum. As part of the procurement process, the program will present the MRP commodity requirements and procurement policy to local suppliers and vendors.

8. FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT

As originally planned, all personnel recruitment, procurement and financial operations shall be heavily supported by the Country Office to allow transition and systems set-up during the first nine (9) months of MRP start-up operations.

MRP-PMO is still finalizing the hiring to complete the Finance Unit. As soon as they are on board, all Finance personnel will undergo a two (2) week Financial Management training to be conducted by the Plan International Country Office in Makati.

By March 2019, a fully functional MRP Finance Unit will be in place and will have the capacity to disburse funds, issue direct payments to suppliers and creditors, and have direct control of budgets and cash flow including generation of financial reports.

24

ANNEXES Report for the Quarter Ending December 31, 2018

1.1 Annex 1. Summary of Accomplishments by Objective

Objective 1: To establish the MRP field office in Iligan City, mobilize the implementing teams at Plan USA and Plan Philippines, and hire all key personnel.

Result Area Outcome for start-up period Status Plan staff informed of award and mobilized to Mobilization of Plan USA and Accomplished Plan Philippines Country Office commence support to field office. staff Sub-awards issued Partially Accomplished Office established, lease agreement signed and office furnished (including refurbishment of rented office Partially Accomplished Establishment of Iligan City space). Refurbishment will be contracted to a local office contractor. Priority equipment procured Accomplished Security plan completed Partially Accomplished Personnel Key personnel hired Partially Accomplished Grants Manual completed Accomplished Annual Implementation Plan submitted Accomplished Planning Monitoring Evaluation and Learning (MEL) Plan Accomplished completed Accomplished Meetings with USAID bridge projects completed Coordination Meetings with bilateral and multi-lateral agencies Accomplished held. Research Research activities initiated Not accomplished.

Objective 2: Submission and review of initial proposals developed by community solidarity groups (CSGs) and local Marawi business associations, some of which may receive future funds under the MRP grants component.

Result Area Outcome for start-up period Status MRP partners have identified initial barangays to Accomplished work in. An agreement on processes to guide field operations Accomplished is reached between MRP and its partners. Formation of Community CSGs are organized comprising IDPs and host Accomplished Solidarity Groups (CSG) community members. Conflict assessments are prepared. Accomplished Priority community projects are identified. Accomplished Initial community proposals are prepared by CSGs Partially Accomplished A local business organization is mobilized to help Prepare to support business Accomplished identify businesses needing assistance for recovery. recovery Identified business prepare initial proposals for Partially accomplished possible assistance. Prepare to support women and Specific interventions to address the needs of the youth for peacebuilding Accomplished youth and women are designed initiatives

Prepare to provide immediate Specific interventions to address concerns of IDPs in Accomplished assistance to IDPs evacuation centers designed. 1.2 Annex 2. MRP-PMO Staffing Update

[Personally Identifiable Information removed]

1.3 Annex 3. List of Officials Consulted/Coordinated by MRP-PMO

[Personally Identifiable Information removed]

1.4 Annex 4. Do-No-Harm Checklist

Do-No-Harm Checklist Remarks Based on the community conflict assessment prepared by the LCP, the project or activity will not abet or trigger any conflict in the community.

The project or activity is culturally sensitive.

The project is child and youth friendly. The project will not expose children to any risks including child exploitation, physical dangers, child labor and others. (For projects that anticipate activities involving children and youth, attach child/youth protection risk assessment containing risk mitigating measures.)

The project is gender sensitive. The project allows full participation of women and girls, does not trigger domestic violence, promotes gender equality in the workplace.

The project does not include activities or promote the use of goods or services that will have adverse impact on the environment or community.

The project promotes fair competition but does not endanger the viability of existing economic activities in the community.

The allocation of benefits from the project is equitable and will not trigger any conflict among the beneficiaries.

1.5 Annex 5. IDP and Host Community Engagement & Grant Application Cycle

ACTIVITIES TOWARDS GRANT APPLICATION PHASE DEVELOPMENT

 Sites defined through the AWP; Pre-entry (to Community) Phase  Gather information from LGUs;  Facilitators mobilized.

 Barangay and municipal officials oriented on MRP; Community Entry Phase  IDPs and host community and their leaders identified and contacted;  Camp managers consulted and oriented.

 Rapid socio-economic assessment of site completed;  Conflict assessment of site is conducted; Formation and/or consolidation of CSGs  List of IDPs validated;  CSGs are formed, composed of IDPs and host community members;  At least two CSG meetings held successfully;  At least one barangay official attending both CSGs. meetings Project prioritization and selection  CSG prioritization workshops  In a Project prioritization workshop or score-card activity,  Score-card activities/events (year 2) priority projects are identified by the CSG meeting as group,

with other community representatives;  The CSG with the community representatives select from among the shortlisted projects, those to be proposed for grant assistance; Preparation of Concept Note  The original proponents of selected projects organize. themselves.

 Project proponents, with assistance from the CDF, draft one- page concept notes for endorsement to the finance and grants Preparation of Grant Application assistants.

 Project proponents with assistance from the finance and grants assistants prepare a grant application (with a budget) based on the concept note;  Prepare a quick Do-No-Harm assessment;  Eligibility for grant funding is ascertained;  The project proponents submit the proposal to MRP.

1.6 Annex 6. List of LGU Officials Contacted/Coordinated by Maradeca

[Personally Identifiable Information Removed] 1.7 Annex 7. Maradeca CSG Information Summary

CSG Members Name of Proposed Projects with Concept Notes City or Host Barangay CSG IDP Total Municipality Community Organized Economic Social Community Development Cohesion Facilities Men Women Men Women

1. BUADIPOSO BUNTONG, LANAO DEL SUR Buadiposo Soara O’mga Computer 1 Brgy. Bubong 0 0 0 24 0 61 85 Buntong Bae Shop Tailoring & 0 0 Dress Shop Union of Bgy Buadiposo Bubong 1 Brgy. Bubong Barber Shop 0 0 11 0 40 0 51 Buntong Farmers Organization Rice Farming 0 0 TOTAL 1 2 3 0 0 11 24 40 61 136 2. BUBONG, LANAO DEL SUR Livestock Comfort Bubong 1 Brgy. Pagayawan Farmers Raising 0 Room (Public 10 0 12 0 22 Organization Toilet) Repair Multi- Pagayawan purpose Bubong 1 Brgy. Pagayawan Farmers 0 0 pavement Organization Rehab/Repair Kalimudan Repair of Functional Bubong 1 Brgy. Pagayawan Women’s 0 Water 0 18 0 10 28 Literacy Organization Reservoir New School Supplies Bubong 1 Brgy. Pagayawan Generation 0 0 2 1 10 8 21 (Store) (Youth) TOTAL 1 3 2 1 3 12 19 22 18 71

3. DITSAAN RAMAIN, LANAO DEL SUR Polonian Ditsaan 1 Brgy Polo Women’s 0 0 0 0 48 0 28 76 Ramain Movement Alnor Ditsaan 1 Brgy Polo Farmer’s 0 0 0 39 0 14 0 53 Ramain Organization Ditsaan 1 Brgy Polo Power Youth 0 0 0 6 21 10 14 51 Ramain TOTAL 1 3 0 0 0 45 69 24 42 180

4. LUMBAYANAGUE, LANAO DEL SUR Ompongan o T-Shirt and Lumbayanague 1 Brgy Nanagun mga angudaan Computer 0 0 3 8 5 7 23 sa Nanagun Services Ompongan o mga Taribasok Sakurab Water Lumbayanague 1 Brgy Nanagun 0 15 0 23 0 38 sa Ranao- Farming System Nanagun Ompongan o mga Bae sa Rice Lumbayanague 1 Brgy Nanagun 0 0 0 37 0 24 61 Ranao- Dealership Nanagun Ompongan o mga Taribasok Lumbayanague 2 Brgy Wago 0 0 0 10 0 20 0 30 sa Ranao- Wago Ompongan o Lumbayanague 2 Brgy Wago mga Bae sa 0 0 0 0 28 0 15 43 Ranao-Wago Wagonians Lumbayanague 2 Brgy Wago Youth 0 0 0 18 15 27 45 105 Organization Kapamagogopa Lumbayanague 2 Brgy Wago Farmers 0 0 0 30 0 40 0 70 Organization Wago Lumbayanague 2 Brgy Wago Women’s 0 0 0 0 42 0 67 109 Sector TOTAL 2 8 3 0 1 76 130 115 158 479

5. MARANTAO, LANAO DEL SUR Taayon Upland Corn Marantao 1 Brgy. Ragayan Farmers 0 0 23 0 23 0 46 Farming Organization Pacaranun Marantao 1 Brgy. Ragayan Women Dress-making 0 0 0 46 0 38 84 Organization Pacaranun Marantao 1 Brgy. Ragayan Women Mini Grocery 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Organization Pacaranun Marantao 1 Brgy. Ragayan Women Rice Retail 0 0 Organization T-Shirt Printing Future Hope Marantao 1 Brgy. Ragayan & Computer 0 0 5 6 8 13 32 (Youth) Services Salimpokaw Rice and Corn Farm to Marantao 2 Brgy. Tacub Pindolonan Farmers 0 9 2 17 0 28 Farming Market Road Organization Kanggiginawae Marantao 2 Brgy. Tacub Pindolonan ko Masa Dress-making 0 0 5 16 1 34 56 Organization Kanggiginawae Masjid Marantao 2 Brgy. Tacub Pindolonan ko Masa Sari-sari Store 0 0 0 0 0 0 Equipment Organization Kalumbayan Computer Solar Street Marantao 2 Brgy. Tacub Pindolonan Youth 0 2 5 9 7 23 Shop Light Movement TOTAL 2 6 9 1 2 44 75 58 92 269

6. POONA BAYABAO, LANAO DEL SUR Cadayonan Poona Brgy. Cadayonan Fish Catching Livelihood Toilet Repair 1 Mandarin 18 0 4 0 22 Bayabao (Evacuation Center) (Fishing) Training for Madrasah Group Cadayonan United Poona Brgy. Cadayonan 1 Women for 0 0 0 0 29 0 3 32 Bayabao (Evacuation Center) Peace and Development Poona Brgy. Cadayonan Salimbago Street 1 0 0 20 0 0 0 20 Bayabao (Evacuation Center) Men's Group Lighting Salimbago Poona Brgy. Cadayonan 1 Farmers' Rice Dealing 0 0 Bayabao (Evacuation Center) Group Poona Brgy. Cadayonan Sacrifice 1 0 0 0 0 26 0 0 26 Bayabao (Evacuation Center) Shelter Group United Youth of Cadayonan Poona Brgy. Cadayonan 1 Towards 0 Sportsfest 0 7 5 13 1 26 Bayabao (Evacuation Center) Solidarity & Resilience TOTAL 1 5 2 2 2 45 60 17 4 126

7. SAGUIARAN, LANAO DEL SUR Barangay - Saguiaran 1 Covered Court Itihadon Nisah Grocery 0 0 0 46 0 0 46 (Evacuation Center) Barangay Poblacion- Saguiaran IDPs Rice Solar Street Saguiaran 1 Covered Court United 0 20 0 0 0 20 Dealership Lights (Evacuation Center) Organization Barangay Poblacion- Sindaw Ko Saguiaran 1 People’s Plaza Masa 0 0 0 0 28 0 0 28 (Evacuation Center) Organization Barangay Poblacion- Kalilintad Saguiaran 1 People’s Plaza Men’s 0 0 0 19 0 0 0 19 (Evacuation Center) Organization Barangay Poblacion- Kalumbayan Saguiaran 1 People’s Plaza Organization- 0 0 0 33 33 0 0 66 (Evacuation Center) People’s Plaza TOTAL 1 5 2 0 2 72 107 0 0 179

8. TUGAYA, LANAO DEL SUR Pandi Aranao Tugaya 1 Pandia Ranao Women’s 0 57 0 99 156 Organization Kapialo Pandi Tugaya 1 Pandia Ranao Aranao 33 0 63 0 96 Organization Pandi Aranao Tugaya 1 Pandia Ranao Youth 1 9 0 20 30 Organization TOTAL 1 3 0 0 0 34 66 63 119 282

OVERALL 10 35 21 4 10 339 550 339 494 1,722 TOTAL

1.8 Annex 8. List of LGU Officials Contacted/Coordinated by EcoWeb

[Personally Identifiable Information Removed] 1.9 Annex 9. ECOWEB CSG Information Summary

CSG Members Proposed Projects with Concept Notes City or Name of CSG Barangay IDP Host Community Total Municipality Organized Economic Social Community Development Cohesion Facilities Men Women Men Women

1. BALO-I, LANAO DEL NORTE Balo-i 1 Basagad Basagadnians 0 0 0 9 9 0 0 18 Balo-i 2 Landa Team Toril 0 0 0 8 9 0 0 17 Balo-i 2 Landa Silver 0 0 0 3 9 0 0 12 Balo-i 2 Landa Gold Cup 0 0 0 3 8 0 0 11 Sari-sari Store Balo-i 3 Matampay Achievers Group 0 0 0 14 0 0 14 & Snack Inn Balo-i 3 Matampay Tagumpiya 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 8 Balo-i 3 Matampay Sindalo 0 0 0 4 17 0 0 21 TOTAL 3 7 2 0 0 35 66 0 0 101

2. BUTIG, LANAO DEL SUR Butig 1 Bayabao Baraka 0 0 0 7 11 1 1 20 Butig 1 Bayabao Hedra 0 0 0 3 9 0 0 12 Butig 1 Bayabao Jannah Al-Ferdous 0 0 0 12 4 0 0 16 Butig 1 Bayabao Mipantao 0 0 0 1 5 2 2 10 Butig 2 Sandab Alomnay 0 0 0 8 17 0 0 25 Butig 2 Sandab Arham Group 0 0 0 6 5 0 0 11 Cultural Butig 2 Sandab Bandera Group 0 0 5 10 0 0 15 Festivity Sipa Sa 0 Lama Ago 0 Manggis Butig 2 Sandab Baracat Team 0 0 0 0 6 1 8 15 Butig 2 Sandab Diyalongana 0 0 0 7 6 0 0 13 Butig 2 Sandab Ingungka 0 0 0 1 3 2 9 15 Butig 2 Sandab Kaisa-isa 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 4 Butig 2 Sandab Kalilang 0 0 0 5 10 0 0 15 Butig 2 Sandab Kalilintad Andaka 0 0 0 14 14 0 0 28 Butig 2 Sandab Kalilintad Kapipiyaginawa 0 0 0 0 3 4 11 18 Butig 2 Sandab Kamapiyaan 0 0 0 10 17 0 0 27 Butig 2 Sandab Kamapiyaan New 0 0 0 2 17 1 7 27 Butig 2 Sandab Maayon 0 0 0 0 0 7 8 15 Butig 2 Sandab Magatoring 0 0 0 5 12 0 0 17 Butig 2 Sandab Masabar Lilod 0 0 0 6 10 1 5 22 Butig 2 Sandab Pamorawag 0 0 0 1 14 0 0 15 Butig 2 Sandab Pananadum Group 1 0 0 0 7 21 0 0 28 Butig 2 Sandab Pananadum Group 2 0 0 0 8 7 0 0 15 Butig 2 Sandab Pindiaman 0 0 0 3 8 0 4 15 Butig 2 Sandab Preparation 0 0 0 0 1 3 11 15 Butig 2 Sandab Preposition 0 0 0 0 0 7 9 16 Butig 2 Sandab Rahmat 0 0 0 1 1 6 22 30 Butig 2 Sandab Reposition 0 0 0 1 11 0 0 12 Butig 2 Sandab Salenbtad 0 0 0 0 2 1 12 15 Butig 2 Sandab Salik-Bandera Group 0 0 0 4 16 0 0 20 Butig 2 Sandab Salimbago 0 0 0 7 17 0 0 24 Butig 2 Sandab Salimbtad 0 0 0 14 11 0 0 25 Butig 2 Sandab Sindaw Maliwanag 0 0 0 6 9 0 0 15 Butig 2 Sandab Sorotaiman 0 0 0 13 8 0 1 22 Butig 2 Sandab Sorotaiman Group 1 0 0 0 2 5 8 0 15 Butig 2 Sandab Sorotaiman Group 2 0 0 0 11 6 0 0 17 Butig 2 Sandab Sorotaiman Group 3 0 0 0 13 8 0 1 22 Butig 3 Tiowi 0 0 0 7 12 0 0 19 Butig 3 Tiowi Sacrifice 0 0 0 7 20 0 0 27 Butig 3 Tiowi Tiowinian Mogop 0 0 0 0 0 11 9 20 TOTAL 3 39 0 2 0 199 338 55 120 712

3. ILIGAN CITY, LANAO DEL NORTE Bagong Iligan City 1 Al-Madhina Group 0 0 0 10 9 0 0 19 Silang Bagong Iligan City 1 Bagong Silang 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 Silang Bagong Iligan City 1 Hawak Kamay 0 0 0 4 6 0 0 10 Silang Bagong Iligan City 1 Kalilintad 0 0 0 15 21 0 0 36 Silang Bagong Iligan City 1 Masaya Group 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 7 Silang Del Iligan City 2 Nor Salam 0 0 0 5 9 0 0 14 Carmen Del Iligan City 2 Purok 7 0 0 0 7 8 0 0 15 Carmen Del Iligan City 2 Purok 9 0 0 0 8 7 1 0 16 Carmen Iligan City 3 Luinab Purok 5 Upper Luinab 0 0 0 7 5 0 0 12 Iligan City 3 Luinab Solid 0 0 0 1 7 0 0 8 Iligan City 4 Mahayahay Adelfanianz Internet Café 0 0 1 7 0 0 8 Iligan City 4 Mahayahay Banggolo Dressmaking 0 0 1 4 0 0 5 Rice Retailing Iligan City 4 Mahayahay Barakaallah 0 0 6 8 0 0 14 Business Rice Dealing Iligan City 4 Mahayahay Dansalan 0 0 5 7 0 0 12 and Retailing Iligan City 4 Mahayahay Kalilintad Group Rice Dealer 0 0 8 4 0 0 12 Iligan City 4 Mahayahay Kambalingan Grocery Store 0 0 5 4 0 0 9 Rice Retailing Iligan City 4 Mahayahay Marawi Group 0 0 3 5 0 0 8 and Dealing Iligan City 4 Mahayahay Masayahin 0 0 0 1 6 0 0 7 Rice Retailing/ Iligan City 4 Mahayahay Moro 0 0 2 10 0 0 12 Wholesaling Rice /retailing Iligan City 4 Mahayahay Team Kalilintad 0 0 5 9 0 0 14 Business Iligan City 4 Mahayahay Team Star Rice Retail 0 0 2 8 0 0 10 Textile/Dry Goods Iligan City 4 Mahayahay Westlife 0 0 14 5 0 0 19 Manufacturing/ Distribution Iligan City 5 Sta Elena Bus8ness Kaiagan 0 0 0 6 1 0 0 7 Iligan City 5 Sta Elena Sabar Group 0 0 0 7 5 0 0 12 Iligan City 5 Sta Elena Kalilintad 0 0 0 4 2 0 0 6 Iligan City 5 Sta Elena Young Master 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 9 Iligan City 5 Sta Elena Survivor Group 0 0 0 5 10 0 0 15 Iligan City 5 Sta Elena Dimagiba Survivor 0 0 0 6 6 0 0 12 Iligan City 5 Sta Elena Baraka Group 0 0 0 3 7 0 0 10 Iligan City 5 Sta Elena Takwa Host Group 0 0 0 6 4 0 0 10 Iligan City 5 Sta Elena Salam Group 0 0 0 6 6 0 0 12 Iligan City 5 Sta Elena Pagasa Group 0 0 0 4 8 0 0 12 Iligan City 5 Sta Elena Forevermore 0 0 0 3 10 0 0 13 Iligan City 5 Sta Elena Sacrifice 0 0 0 2 10 0 0 12 Sto Iligan City 6 Kapamagogopa 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 10 Rosario Sto Iligan City 6 Kauyagan 0 0 0 8 3 0 0 11 Rosario Sto Iligan City 6 Mimbalawag 0 0 0 1 6 0 0 7 Rosario Sto Iligan City 6 Survivor 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 3 Rosario Rice Retailing/ Iligan City 7 Tambacan Barbie 0 0 4 11 0 0 15 Distribution Rice Retailing/ Iligan City 7 Tambacan Riverside 0 0 10 13 0 0 23 Cooperative Rice Retailing/ Iligan City 7 Tambacan Purok 12 0 0 5 14 0 0 19 Distribution Iligan City 7 Tambacan Survivor 0 0 0 4 7 0 0 11 Rice Retailing Iligan City 7 Tambacan Group 1 0 0 2 7 0 0 9 and Delivery Rice Retailing Iligan City 7 Tambacan Maligaya 0 0 5 1 0 0 6 and Delivery Rice Wholesale Iligan City 7 Tambacan Magandang Buhay 0 0 5 3 0 0 8 and Retail Special Iligan City 7 Tambacan Maranao Food Coop Maranao Food 0 0 5 1 0 0 6 Cooperative Iligan City 7 Tambacan Purok 9 Sari-sari Store 0 0 2 7 0 0 9 Computer and Tomas Iligan City 8 Achiever Bookbinding 0 0 9 6 0 0 15 Cabili Services Iligan City Tomas Ceanuri Grocery Store 8 0 0 6 10 0 0 16 Cabili Iligan City Tomas Fighters Dressmaking 8 0 0 2 6 0 0 8 Cabili Tomas Grocery Store Iligan City 8 Kamapiyaan 0 0 2 7 0 0 9 Cabili Rice Dealer Tomas Iligan City 8 Madrasah Al Nor (Wholesale and 0 0 2 9 0 0 11 Cabili Retail) Tomas Rice Dealer Iligan City 8 Masinag 0 0 5 8 0 0 13 Cabili and Distributor Tomas Grocery Store Iligan City 8 Protect 0 0 4 3 0 0 7 Cabili Tomas Rice Dealer Iligan City 8 Tomas Cabili 0 0 7 8 0 0 15 Cabili and Distributor Iligan City 9 Tubod Adventure Group 0 0 0 4 6 0 0 10 Iligan City 9 Tubod Camp 1 0 0 0 2 5 0 0 7 Iligan City 9 Tubod Home Sweet Home 0 0 0 1 7 0 0 8 Iligan City 9 Tubod Kalilintad 0 0 0 3 12 0 0 15 Iligan City 9 Tubod Kappiya Ginawa 0 0 0 10 7 0 0 17 Iligan City 9 Tubod Survivor 0 0 0 13 7 0 0 20 Iligan City 9 Tubod Survivor Team 0 0 0 4 11 0 0 15 Ubaldo Iligan City 10 Dreamer Bakery 0 0 9 12 0 0 21 Laya Ubaldo Grocery Store Iligan City 10 Kalilintad 0 0 7 9 0 0 16 Laya and Rice Retail Ubaldo Rice and Corn Iligan City 10 Kapamagogopa 0 0 14 8 0 0 22 Laya Cooperative Ubaldo Iligan City 10 Pag-Asa Bakeshop 0 0 4 11 0 1 16 Laya Ubaldo Rice Retail Iligan City 10 Suwara Kalilintad 0 0 4 10 0 0 14 Laya Upper Iligan City 11 Palaban 0 0 0 6 5 0 0 11 Hinaplanon Upper Iligan City 11 Cali 0 0 0 4 10 0 0 14 Hinaplanon Upper Iligan City 11 Warda 0 0 0 4 3 0 0 7 Hinaplanon Upper Iligan City 11 Sampaguita 0 0 0 3 13 0 0 16 Hinaplanon Upper Iligan City 11 Muhammad Nor 0 0 0 3 3 0 0 6 Hinaplanon TOTAL 11 72 32 0 0 361 501 1 1 864

4. KAPAI, LANAO DEL SUR Kapai 1 Pindolonan Pindolonan IDP Rice Coop 0 0 6 15 0 0 21 TOTAL 1 1 0 0 6 15 0 0 21

5. PANTAO RAGAT, LANAO DEL SUR Pantao Ragat 1 Bubong Bubong Producer 0 0 0 2 6 2 0 10 Pantao Ragat 2 Calawe Group Kalilintad 0 0 0 8 17 6 0 31 East Pantao Ragat 3 BMK Group 0 0 0 10 22 0 0 32 Problacion Pantao Ragat 4 Lumbac Khasarigan Group 0 0 0 4 7 3 0 14 TOTAL 4 4 0 0 0 24 52 11 0 87

6. PANTAR, LANAO DEL SUR Pantar 1 Poblacion Mapia Group 0 0 0 9 11 0 0 20 Pantar 1 Poblacion Survivor 0 0 0 2 16 1 0 19 Poona Pantar 2 Fighter 0 0 0 4 10 0 0 14 Punod Poona Pantar 2 Survivor 0 0 0 5 13 0 0 18 Punod Sundiga Pantar 3 Daunties 0 0 0 13 10 0 0 23 Punod TOTAL 3 5 0 0 0 33 60 1 0 94

OVERALL 25 128 34 2 0 658 1032 68 121 1879 TOTAL

1.10 Annex 10. Projects Identified During Prioritization Workshops

Municipality Barangay CSG Economic Priorities Social Cohesion Priorities Community Infrastructure Marantao Ragayan Men 1 Plumbing 1. Islamic Seminar 1. Solar street lights 2. Driving tricycle 2. Repair of Madrasa 3. Hardware business 3. Botika ng Barangay 4. Sari Sari store 5. Farming 6. Tailoring/Dressmaking 7. Auto repair shop Women 1. Sari Sari store 1. Islamic Seminar 1. Chair 2 Dressmaking 2. Organizational development 2. Street light trainings including Registration 3. Rice Dealer 4. Beauty salon 5. Farming/Gardening 6. Computer shop 7. Snack in/Carenderia 8. School Supplies Youth 1. T-shirt Printing and computer 1. Peace building training 1. Chair 2. Driving Training 2. street light 3. Sari sari store 4. Dressmaking 5. training on baking Saguiaran Peoples Plaza Women 1. Sari Sari store 1.Islamic training 1. water pump 2. rice dealer 2. street lights 3. snack inn 3. chairs 4. Vocational training (dressmaking and computer) Men 1. Sari Sari store 1. water pump 2. rice dealer 2. street lights 3.E-loader 3. chairs 4. Livelihood trainings (Computer and carpentry) Youth 1. Photo copier (xerox) 1. Peace building training 1. Street lights 2. E loader 2. water pump-

3. Computer printing and computer shop 4. dress making Training Saguiaran Covered Court Men 1. Rice Dealer 1. Islamic Seminar 1. Solar street lights 2. Grocery 3. Restaurant 4.TESDA Training Women 1. Sari Sari store 1.Islamic training 1.Trash bins 2. Grocery 2.Clean up drive 3. Restaurant 4. TESDA Training Ditsaan Ramain Polo Women 1. Dress making 1. Seminar on Unity and cohesion 1.Public market 2. Sari Sari store 2.Fish equipment 3. Water refiling station 3.Canal Repair 4. Kapangantowiras (sequencing) 4.provision of fingerlings 5. Food stall 5.water refiling station 6. Gardening 7. Skills Training 8. Fish equipment Youth 1. Scholarship 1.Islamic training 1.Trash bins 2. Printing shop 2.training programs 2.Reservoir 3. Food processing 4. bakery Bubong Pagayawan Women 1. Rice Dealer 1. Seminar on Cooperative 1. Madrasa 2. Groceries 2. Irrigation 3. Sari sari store 3. Gymnasium 4. Water Refiling Station 4. Street lights 5. School Supply 5. Hand pump 6. Fish vending 6. Multi-purpose pavement 7. Gardening 8. TESDA Training (baking, food processing, dress making) Farmer 1. Rice Dealer 1. Public CR 1. Street lights 2. Fish or Chicken Vendor 2. Water pump 2. Water irrigation 3. Supplier of Palapa 3. Irrigation 3. Health Center 4. Vulcanizing Shop/Welding shop 4. Farmer Tool 5. Water refiling 5. Gymnasium 6. Smart Padala 6. Repair of Masjid

7. Livestock 7. Materials for the Barangay hall equipment chairs and tables Youth 1. e-loader of smart and globe and 1. Irrigation 1. Masjid Repair smart money transfer 2. school supply 2. water pump 2. Street light 3. Catering/Food Catering 3. Sport festival 3. Barangay Health Center 4. Xerox/Computer shop 4. Ramadhan Program 4. Garbage Bins 5. Seminar for Youth 5. Grass Cutters Buadiposo Bubong Women 1. Computer Services 1. skills training 1.Agricultural equipment Buntong 2. Dressmaking 2. Islamic seminar 2. Botika ng barangay 3. Sari sari store 3. Public CR 4. Gardening 4. Irrigation 5. Restaurant/Carenderia 5. Public market 6. Bakeshop Men 1. Farming /Gardening] 1. CSG development training 1. Farming tools 2. Computer shop 2. masjid equipment 3. Sari Sari store 3. Public CR 4. Barber shop 4. Street lights 5. Bakery 5. Basketball court Lumbayanague Wago Women 1. Sari Sari store w/ Gasoline 1. capacity building for CSG 1. Open Gymnasium 2. Farming 2. Skills training 2.Water system 3. Gardening 3. Islamic Seminar 3. Health Center 4. Dressmaking 4. Street lights 5. Rice and Corn Dryer Men 1. Business/ groceries 1. Training for CSGs 1. Open Gymnasium 2. Farming 2. Skills training 2. Water system 3. Livestock 3. Ramadhan Program 3. Health Center 4. driver 4. Cleanliness (clean up drive) 4. Warehouse Lumbayanague Nanagun CDMC (men 1. Farming /Gardening] 1. Islamic Seminar 1. Water System women Youth) 2. Sari sari store 2. Trainings on Leadership 2. Botika ng barangay 3. Rice Dealer 3. Development Activities for CSGs 4. Tailoring/Dressmaking 5. Computer 6. Livestock Poona Bayabao Cadayonan Women 1. Dress making 1. Skills training 1. Street lights 2. Sari Sari store 2. Ramadhan program 2. Shelter repair

3. Fishing 3. Islamic seminar 3. Public CR 4.Xerox machine 4. sport feast 4. Water supply 5. Rice Retailer 5. Fish pond 6.Food stall 7. Bakery 8. Farming Men 1. Tricycle 1. Leadership seminar 1. Integrated terminal driver 2. rice dealer 2. CSG capacity building trainings 2. Wet/dry market 3. fishing 3. Fish landing 4. livelihood trainings 5. cooperative 6. grocery 7. gasoline station 8. irrigation 9. Fish vendor Youth 1. TESDA Training 1.Youth sports tournaments 1.Sports equipment Marantao Tacub Women 2. Sari Sari Store 2.Seminars 2.Masjid improvements Pindolonan 3. Dress making 3.Materials for madrasa (chairs, 3.Public CR and market tables) 4.Beauty Salon 4.Training for CSGs 4.Health Center 5.Rice mill Youth 1.Computer Shop 1.Training on Peace 1.Street lights solar 2.Dress making 2.Youth programs 2.Free education 3.Sari sari Store 3.Multipurpose hall 4.Bakery 5.Driving (multi cab and tricycle) Farmers 1.Farming 1.Capacity building for CSGs 1.Public market 2.trycle 2.Farm to market road Balo-i Matampay Achiever 1.Snack inn Butig Sandab Bandera 1.Rice mill 1.Sipa event 1.Multipurpose pavement Kalilang 2.Cultural festival 2.Multipurpose pavement Iligan City Mahayhay Adelfa 1.Internet shop Banggolo 2.Dressmaking Baraka 3.Rice dealership Dansalan 4.Rice dealership Kalintad 5.Rice dealership Kambalingan 6.Grocery

Marawi 7.Rice retailing Masayahin 8.Rice retailing Moro 9.Rice retailing Kalintad 10.Rice dealership Team star 11.Grocery Westlife 12.Textile/dry goods Tambacan Barbie 1.Rice dealership Riverside 2.Rice dealership Purok 12 3.Rice dealership Survivor 4.Snack Inn Group 1 5.Rice retailing Maligaya 6.Rice retailing Magandang 7.Rice dealership Buhay Maranao Food 8.Special Manao Purok 9 9.Grocery T. Cabili Achiever 1.Computer Shop Ceanuri 2.Grocery Fighters 3.Dressmaking Kamapiyahan 4.Grocery Madrasah 5.Rice dealership Masinag 6.Rice dealership Protect 7.Grocery T Cabili 8.Rice dealership Ubaldo Laya Kapamagogopa 1.Rice mill Pag asa 2.Bakeshop Suwara Kaliintad 3.Rice mill

Sub-totals 159 49 79 TOTAL 287

1.11 Annex 11. Security Risk Assessments

Below is a list of the security risk assessments conducted during this quarter:  Cagayan de Oro City, Claveria and Misamis Oriental  Lanao del Sur including Marawi City  Lanao del Norte including Iligan City  Surigao del Norte