Undocumented Latino Youth and the DREAM Movement

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

NACLA REPORT ON THE AMERICAS report: student movements A Dream Detained: Undocumented Latino Youth and the DREAM Movement By Arely M. Zimmerman N OCTOBER 12, 2011, FIVE UNDOCUMENTED immigrant ordinances and laws are being consid- Latino youth wearing graduation caps ered in an unprecedented number of localities and Ostaged a sit-in at the Immigration and states. Laws banning undocumented immigrants Customs Enforcement (ICE) offices in downtown from renting homes, penalizing employers who Los Angeles. The sit-in was meant to urge the hire them, and barring undocumented youth from Obama administration to stop deporting undocu- universities are part of a larger trend in which im- mented youths.1 It also launched the national Edu- migration law and enforcement is transferred to the cation Not Deportation (END) Our Pain campaign, local and state level within the context of neoliberal undertaken by a network of immigrant youth or- restructuring.2 Over the past several decades, the ganizations and allies demanding an immediate United States has implemented two contradictory moratorium on deportations of youth eligible for policies: It has liberalized the economy—enabling the Development, Relief, and Education for Alien the free movement of capital—and increased Minors (DREAM) Act. If passed, it would grant border enforcement and the criminalization and conditional legal status to those brought here under surveillance of migrant workers and their families. age 16 if they attend college or join the military. These broader neoliberal agendas have fundamen- Despite recent announcements from the Obama tally and strategically been implemented in cities, administration that it would ease up on non- whose residents have consequently faced changing criminal deportations, U.S. officials continue to de- demographics and economic restructuring. The lo- port undocumented immigrants at a record-setting cal and state government anti-immigrant policies, rate. Federal programs such as Secure Communities, have largely been in response to the cities’ anxieties are at least partially responsible, essentially turning and impulses to counteract demographic and eco- local law enforcement into de facto Border Patrol nomic changes with exclusionary and restrictive agents. Tony Ortuño, one of the participants in the covenants that target undocumented workers. sit-in, explained his reasons for risking arrest: For the last four years the number of states that “We . were hopeful that the recent announce- allow undocumented students to receive in-state ments by President Obama would bring relief to tuition has plateaued.3 Only 10 states now offer in- DREAM Act-eligible youth . However, due to state tuition to undocumented immigrants. Instead, programs like Secure Communities . the num- many states are now looking to roll back in-state bers of undocumented youth who are incarcerated, tuition or pass laws preventing undocumented Arely M. Zimmer- shackled, and deported to countries they barely immigrants from attending. The most recent puni- man holds a Ph.D. know continues to rise.” tive measures have been passed in new immigrant in Political Science The civil disobedience reflects how the undoc- destinations such as South Carolina, Georgia, and from UCLA, and is currently an umented youth movement has transitioned and Alabama, which have gone so far as banning un- Andrew Mellon transformed—from a movement that was initially documented youth from universities. Postdoctoral Fellow focused on building support for the DREAM Act This is despite the fact that international free in Social Movements to one that has increasingly used direct action to trade agreements and current U.S. laws have been in the Department bring attention to broader issues of immigrant, largely responsible for transforming circular migra- of American Studies and the Program civil, and human rights as a strategy for social tion patterns into largely undocumented migrant for Environmental and policy change. The tactical shift has been in settlement, in which immigrant children are largely and Regional Equity response to a changing political context in which affected.4 In other words, while the United States at the University of the will to pass immigration reform has waned in has actively recruited, relied on, and imported Southern California. Washington, deportations are on the rise, and anti- Mexican migrant labor that was seasonal, temporal, 14 NOVEMBER/DECEMBER 2011 report: student movements A DREAM Act supporter with a graduation cap demonstrates in front of the Immigration and Customs Enforcement offices in downtown Los Angeles on October 12, to urge the Obama administration to stop deporting undocumented youth. and largely unregulated, current immigration laws and neo- youth who have grown up in the United States to eventu- liberal trade agreements have combined to produce an un- ally obtain permanent legal status and become eligible for documented, settled labor force. U.S. citizenship if they go to college or serve in the U.S. In a 2009 report, the Pew Hispanic Center estimated military. (2) It would eliminate a federal provision that pe- that in 2008 there were 1.7 million undocumented youth nalizes states that provide in-state tuition without regard to between the ages of 18 and 24 living in the United States immigration status. and that Latinos represented 78% of this population.5 The Due to several compromises to secure bipartisan support, increasing numbers of undocumented migrants who have the DREAM Act has undergone significant changes. The mil- decided to stay in the United States has contributed to the itary option—which replaced the community service provi- larger numbers of undocumented children that are growing sion in earlier versions—incited criticism among some who into adulthood. Unfortunately, their legal status, poverty, and saw the new version of the bill as a military recruitment tool poor schools conspire to make political, social, and economic (see “Letter to the DREAM Movement,” page 18).6 When incorporation into society extremely complicated. The cur- the DREAM Act was included in a Defense appropriations rent moment represents a critical juncture not only in the bill, VAMOS Unidos Youth, an organization of street ven- undocumented youth movement, but in shaping policies dors and their children in the Bronx, New York, withdrew that will continue to affect the incorporation patterns of im- support, saying it was “a de facto military draft, forcing un- migrant youth for years to come. documented youth to fight in unjust wars in exchange for the recognition as human beings.”7 INCE 2001, CONGRESS HAS BEEN CONSIDERING A VERSION Some of their concerns are substantiated by the relatively of the DREAM Act, bipartisan legislation that would limited number of youth who would be able to access higher Sprovide an opportunity for undocumented students education in the current economic climate.8 Currently, only with “good moral character,” who have lived in the U.S. for 26% of undocumented youth enroll in college; compared to a certain period, to obtain legal status. The latest version was 56% of 18-24-year-olds who are U.S. born. In other words, introduced May 11. If passed, it would change current law the bill would primarily benefit those willing and able to af- POCHO ONE POCHO in two major ways: (1) It would permit certain immigrant ford college or serve in the military as an option for legaliza- 15 NACLA REPORT ON THE AMERICAS report: student movements tion.9 In a July 2010 report, the Migration Policy Institute sit-ins at Congressional offices, hunger strikes, marches, noted that while over 2 million unauthorized youth could and symbolic graduations, while amplifying their voices be immediately eligible for the DREAM Act, only 33% may through the sophisticated use of blogs, Facebook, You- benefit from the educational path in the bill. Tube, and other social media. In June 2009, the founders Despite these changes in the law, the DREAM Act has in- of DREAM Activist, an online undocumented youth advo- spired political participation and activism of undocumented cacy network, along with United We Dream, organized 500 youth in unprecedented numbers. Before the DREAM Act, youth to participate in the National DREAM Act Graduation immigrant rights activists had primarily focused their orga- in Washington, which combined a symbolic ceremony with nizing efforts on class action lawsuits to defend the right to legislative lobbying.15 Solidarity graduations took place the education for undocumented students at the state level.10 same day in Arizona, California, Florida, Illinois, Indiana, While youth have been historically active in these issues, the Kentucky, Massachusetts, Montana, New Jersey, New York, immigrant rights mobilizations in 2006 opened opportuni- North Carolina, and Texas.16 In another widely publicized ties for broader youth participation. campaign, on January 1, 2010, four undocumented youth Undocumented and immigrant youth participated in from Miami Dade College began a four-month, 1,500-mile- unprecedented numbers in the mobilizations of 2006 and trek to Washington to advocate for the DREAM Act. In what 2007, albeit with some initial resistance from some sec- they aptly called the Trail of DREAMs, the youth document- tors of the movement.11 Initially, student issues were not a ed their walk with active blogging, Facebook, YouTube, and prominent part of the immigrant rights movements’ broader twitter, and gathered 30,000 signatures to bring to President agenda.
Recommended publications
  • 24–25, 45 Activism 11, 80, 121, 132 Anti-Immigrant 114 Civic 72

    24–25, 45 Activism 11, 80, 121, 132 Anti-Immigrant 114 Civic 72

    Index AB 540 148 biopower 36, 41, 44–45, 47 ACLU (American Civil Liberties border 5, 54, 114, 117, 127, 130–31, 137, 143, 147 Union) 24–25, 45 agents at the 53, 140 activism 11, 80, 121, 132 city 2 anti-immigrant 114 crossing xi–xii, 7, 9–10, 55, 57–58, 101, civic 72 121–22, 128–29, 138, 140, 168 college 91 and federal government 114 community 8, 26 Mexican xii, 11, 129–30, 139 Dream Act movement 72, 92 Mexico/Arizona 114 Dreamers 86, 94 and NAFTA 4 faith-based 131 north of the 4, 129 in Logan 39 of the Rio Grande 7 social justice 83 in the San Diego-Tijuana region 138 student 93 San Ysidro 128 undocumented students 86n32 securing the 56, 117, 140 activists 22, 42–43, 114, 122 southern 5, 112 anti-immigrant 115 southern Mexico border 56 community 8, 47, 50, 82–83, 167 south of the 126, 140 Dream Act movement 71, 83, 93 at Tijuana xi–xii, 11, 131 Dreamer 70–71, 74, 82, 93 between Tijuana, Mexico, and San immigrant rights’ 22 Ysidro 128 local resident 45 U.S. 58, 121 and scholars 3, 50, 167 U.S.–Mexico viii, 4–5, 7, 51, 74, 87, 121, AEDPA (Antiterrorism and Effective Death 131, 138 Penalty Act) 20 See also borders American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) border cities 4 24–25, 45 border deaths 50 American dream 10, 82, 128, 137 border enforcement 53 amnesty 103, 115, 146 border patrol officers 129 Amnesty Program 115 border patrol procedures 54 Anaheim (California) xvii, 1, 146 border patrol processing station 5 deportation 1 border regions 4, 117 West Anaheim neighborhood 119 borders viii, xii, 52, 128, 130, 133–34, 140, 144 angelit@s 146,
  • Appendix 8.2.08 Selections from Immigrants Rising Educational

    Appendix 8.2.08 Selections from Immigrants Rising Educational

    EDUCATIONAL RESOURCE BINDER College Access for Undocumented Students in California INTRODUCTION All of us should have the freedom to pursue our dreams without constraint. When everyone is allowed to realize their full potential, we all benefit. However, every year, too many undocumented young people miss key opportunities to enter and succeed in higher education due to a lack of accurate information. The Educational Resource Binder: College Access for Undocumented Students in California has been created by Immigrants Rising to ensure undocumented students and the educators who serve them can easily access accurate and up-to-date information about attending college, including the CA Dream Act, AB 540/SB 68 & Residency, Scholarships That Don’t Require Proof of Citizenship, Institutional Practices, the Sanctuary School and Safe Zone Movement and more! DEFINING UNDOCUMENTED UNDOCUMENTED Deferred Entered with Entered Action for Currently in Legal Status Vulnerable without Childhood the Process but Immigrants Inspection Arrivals of Legalizing Overstayed (DACA) WHO ARE INCLUDED IN THE TERM “UNDOCUMENTED”? We define the term “undocumented” broadly to include all immigrants who reside in the United States without legal status. This includes individuals who: 1. Entered without Inspection (also known as “EWI”) Individuals who entered the United States without presenting themselves for inspection at an official checkpoint to obtain permission to enter the country (e.g. crossing the border without inspection). 2. Entered with Legal Status but Overstayed Individuals who entered the United States with legal status (e.g. student visa) and then remained in the country after their ‘duration of status’ date (found on their I-94) or after their visa expired.
  • The American DREAM: DACA, Dreamers, and Comprehensive Immigration Reform

    The American DREAM: DACA, Dreamers, and Comprehensive Immigration Reform

    The American DREAM: DACA, DREAMers, and Comprehensive Immigration Reform Heather Fathali* “Immigration policy shapes the destiny of the Nation . The his- tory of the United States is in part made of the stories, talents, and lasting contributions of those who crossed oceans and deserts to come here.” –Justice Anthony Kennedy, Arizona v. United States1 “A dream you dream alone is only a dream. A dream you dream to- gether is reality.” –John Lennon2 I. INTRODUCTION In 2011, Maria Gomez earned her master’s degree in architecture and urban design.3 This is an outstanding achievement for any student. For Maria, it was the result of the same hard work and diligence she had practiced since her days as a middle-school honor student, when she first knew that she wanted to become an architect. In high school, Maria excelled in community service, extracurricu- lar, and school leadership activities.4 She graduated tenth in her class with a 3.9 GPA and was accepted by every college to which she applied.5 * J.D. Candidate, Seattle University School of Law, 2014; B.A., Cultural Anthropology, Western Washington University, 2006. My appreciation to Professor Won Kidane and my colleagues at Seat- tle University Law Review for your assistance in the development of this Comment. To husband and my family: I thank you so much for your encouragement, support, and love. 1. Arizona v. United States, 132 S. Ct. 2492, 2510 (2012). 2. While this quote was made famous by and is often attributed to John Lennon, it was actually written by Yoko Ono.
  • CALIFORNIA DREAM ACT Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) for Parents and Students CA Dream Act Background and Eligibility

    CALIFORNIA DREAM ACT Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) for Parents and Students CA Dream Act Background and Eligibility

    CALIFORNIA DREAM ACT Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) for parents and students CA Dream Act Background and Eligibility Q. What is the California Dream Act? Q. Who Can Apply for the California Dream Act? The California Dream Act allows undocumented and nonresident Students who live in California and meet the eligibility requirements documented students who meet certain provisions to apply for and of Assembly Bill (AB) 540 or AB 2000, as well as students who have receive private scholarships funded through public universities, state a U Visa or TPS status, can use the California Dream Act application administered financial aid, University grants, community college fee (CADAA). waivers, and Cal Grants. Q. What is the difference between the Free Application for Federal Student Aid (FAFSA) and the California Dream Act application? The eligibility requirements based on citizenship are completely different for each of these. See below for more details: 1) You are eligible to complete the FAFSA at https://fafsa.ed.gov/ if 2) You are eligible to complete the Dream Act Application (CADAA) at you are a: www.caldreamact.org if you are a: Person who has a Social Security number who is either: Student who is not eligible to file the FAFSA and you: • A U.S. Citizen • Meet the requirements of AB 540 or AB 2000 and/or • An eligible non-citizen, per the FAFSA definition, or • Reside in California with a U-Visa or • The holder of a T-visa • Reside in California with a Temporary Protected Status (TPS) • A U.S. Citizen, eligible non-citizen or the holder of a T - Visa whose parent is undocumented Q.
  • In Their VOICES Undocumented in California Public Colleges and Universities INTRODUCTION

    In Their VOICES Undocumented in California Public Colleges and Universities INTRODUCTION

    In Their VOICES Undocumented in California Public Colleges and Universities INTRODUCTION California has a proud history of welcoming the immigrant and recognizing the tremendous value immigrants bring to the fabric of our state and the inextricable ties that bind our collective future. College opportunity is key to ensuring that California can meet its economic goals, maintain its global standing, and keep up with technological advances. As California’s economy becomes increasingly reliant on a better-educated workforce and further connected to a global marketplace for its services and products, immigrant students are poised to make major contributions to future growth. Nearly 27 percent (three million) of the United States’ undocumented immigrants reside in California.1 Among this diverse population of undocumented immigrants, however, few adults have a college degree. Conservative estimates find that between 64,000 and 86,000 undocumented students are enrolled in California’s public higher education systems.2 Losing, or even underutilizing, these talented students poses a threat to our state’s workforce and economy when you consider California needs an additional 1.65 million college-educated workers by 2030.3 In September of 2017, the Trump Administration announced that it was removing protections for immigrants by rescinding the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program and ordered the Department of Homeland Security to stop accepting new or renewal applications. Numerous lawsuits ensued, and several courts have halted the Administration’s attempts to end DACA.4 As a result, current DACA holders and potential DACA recipients are in a state of limbo, unsure of their status and what the future will hold.
  • IACHR.Complaint.2020.09.30 FINAL

    IACHR.Complaint.2020.09.30 FINAL

    Before the INTER-AMERICAN COMMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS Family Members of Sergio Adrián Hernández Güereca, Jorge Alfredo Solis Palma, Guillermo Arévalo Pedraza, Jesus Alfredo Yañez Reyes, José Antonio Elena Rodríguez, and Juan Pablo Pérez Santillán, Petitioners v. United States, Respondent. COMPLAINT September 30, 2020 Submitted on Behalf of Petitioners by Steve D. Shadowen, Tina J. Miranda, Matthew C. Weiner, Nicholas W. Shadowen Hilliard Shadowen LLP 1135 W. 6th St. Suite 125 Austin, TX 78704 Robert C. Hilliard, Marion M. Reilly Hilliard Martinez Gonzalez LLP 719 Shoreline Blvd., Corpus Christi, TX 78401 Cristóbal M. Galindo 4151 Southwest Pkwy, Suite 602 Houston, TX 77027 Gerald Singleton, Brody McBride Singleton Law Firm, APC 450 A St., 5th Floor San Diego, CA 92101 Roberto C. Montiel Roberto C. Montiel Office, PLLC 571 N. Grand Avenue Nogales, Arizona 85621 Luis Fernando Parra, Esq. Parra Law Offices, PLLC 571 North Grand Avenue Nogales, Arizona 85621 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. STATEMENT OF THE CASE ........................................................................................ 3 II. STATEMENT OF THE FACTS ..................................................................................... 9 A. The United States’ Unlawful Rocking Policy ..........................................................9 1. Background: Economic Opportunism and Nativism ...................................9 2. Background: 9/11 and Militarization .........................................................11 3. The United States’ Acknowledgements of the Rocking
  • An Analysis of the DACA Program Master Thesis by Anniek Van Keeken

    An Analysis of the DACA Program Master Thesis by Anniek Van Keeken

    The Integration of Mexican Undocumented Students in American Society: An Analysis of the DACA Program Master Thesis by Anniek van Keeken 1 July 2015 Anniek van Keeken 900507-425-090, [email protected] Wageningen University - MSc International Development Studies Communication, Technology, and Policy. Thesis code: LAW 80433 www.wageningenur.nl Supervisor: Dr. Michiel Köhne Photo on the cover: Volunteers of the NGO Border Angels go into the desert to place water jugs to limit the deaths of immigrants crossing the border illegally (approximately 1,000 deaths of dehydration each year). Source: author. 2 Abstract ________ This research demonstrates the significance of immigration status in the integration processes of undocumented Mexican students with regards to their access to institutions and (social) services, belonging, and identity (formation), arguing that the DACA program influences predominantly the economic integration of students while lacking the ability for social/cultural and identity integration of its participants. This DACA program stands for Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals and grants eligible students a Social Security Number through which they are able to – among others – apply for legal employment, financial aid, and a drivers’ license. The program is temporary in that eligibility is only for two years (after which participants have to apply again) and it is yet unknown if a next presidential administration will continue this program put in place by President Barack Obama. A qualitative study was conducted within the undocumented Mexican student community of San Diego, California to explore their integration experiences. The research draws on participant observation and interviews with both DACA participants and undocumented students.
  • DREAM Sabbath Scrapbook

    DREAM Sabbath Scrapbook

    DREAM Sabbath Scrapbook Table of Contents State Page Numbers Overview 1 Alabama 2 Arizona 3-4 Arkansas 5 California 5-7 Colorado 8-12 Connecticut 12-13 District of Columbia 13 Delaware 13 Florida 14-29 Georgia 30-33 Idaho 34 Illinois 34 Indiana 34-41 Iowa 41-47 Kansas 48 Kentucky 48-49 Louisiana 49 Maine 49 Maryland 50 Massachusetts 50 Michigan 50 Minnesota 51-56 Missouri 56 Montana 56 Nebraska 56 Nevada 57 New Jersey 57 New Mexico 57 New York 58-64 North Carolina 65-78 Ohio 78-81 Oklahoma 81-83 Oregon 84 Pennsylvania 84-86 South Carolina 86 South Dakota 86 Tennessee 86 Texas 87-89 Utah 90 Vermont 90 Virginia 90 Washington 90 West Virginia 91-93 Wisconsin 94 Wyoming 94 National 94-108 1 Overview: 500 DREAM Sabbath Services Nationwide Sept-Nov 2011 During the fall of 2011, and led by member organizations and denominations of the Interfaith Immigration Coalition, thousands of people of faith participated in DREAM Sabbath. In over 500 congregations, people from all faiths and from across the theological and political spectrum gathered to hear the stories of DREAM students, to pray for their welfare and for their hopes to become U.S. citizens to become true, and to further educate themselves and their communities about the DREAM Act and the need for it to become law. In many of the 500 services, DREAM Act students gave testimony to their struggle of growing up in the United States, succeeding in their schools and communities, but yet, not being allowed to be fully recognized for their contributions.
  • California Dream Act Application California Dream for AB 540 Eligible Students Act Application July 1, 2021 - June 30, 2022

    California Dream Act Application California Dream for AB 540 Eligible Students Act Application July 1, 2021 - June 30, 2022

    California Dream Act Application California Dream for AB 540 Eligible Students Act Application July 1, 2021 - June 30, 2022 This application is used to determine the eligibility of AB 540 students for California student financial aid for the 2021-21 school year. The California Student Aid Commission (Commission) will process this application. Any aid offered can only be used at eligible California institutions. The information on this form will be used to determine eligibility in the Cal Grant program. Ask your college whether they will be using this application for financial aid programs other than the Cal Grant program. The California Dream Act Application can be completed online at www.caldreamact.org. The California Dream Act Application is not an application for federal financial aid. Students eligible to file the Free Application for Federal Student Aid (FAFSA), must use that application which is available on-line at www.fafsa.gov. Students should not complete both applications. Carefully read the statements below starting this applicat on. California Dream Act Application or FAFSA? before i You must submit the FAFSA if: You are a United States citizen, a U.S. national or a lawful permanent resident with an I-151, I-551, or I-551C (Permanent Resident Card). You must submit the California Dream Act Application if: You must submit the FAFSA if: 1. You are not eligible to file the FAFSA, and 1. You are a United States Citizen, U.S. national, or lawful permanent 2. You attended CA high school for three or more years, or resident, or a. You attained credits from a CA high school equivalent to three or 2.
  • Download PCC's AB540 Financial Aid Brochure

    Download PCC's AB540 Financial Aid Brochure

    Let’s get started! Complete the California Dream Act application at Financial Aid https://dream.csac.ca.gov/. This link will allow you Upcoming Events to complete a new application and make now available for corrections to an existing application. AB540 students Pasadena City College school code = 001261 Financial Aid workshops are available to help you complete the application. Note: If you are considered a dependent student on the Dream Act application, you should have Please contact the Financial Aid Office your parents’ financial information ready. for dates and times AB540 students Phone: (626) 585­7401 AB 540, passed in 2001, allows students who Email: [email protected] meet all the following criteria to pay the same tuition and fees as resident students at California public colleges and universities. Starting on January 1, 2013, the California Dream Act extends Cal Grant A & B Entitlements awards, Cal Grant C awards, institutional grants, and community college fee waivers to students who meet these same criteria. To receive Dream Act aid, AB 540, and AB 131, you must: • Have attended a California high school for a minimum of three years. • Graduate from a California high school, pass the California High School Proficiency Exam (CHSPE) or get a General Equivalency Diploma (GED, also called the General Make your college Educational Development test) or other California DREAM Act state­authorized high school equivalency dreams come true! The California Dream Act of 2011 is the result of exam such as HiSET or TASC. two bills, Assembly Bill 130 (AB 130) and • Enroll at a California Community College.
  • AMAE Open Issue Association of Mexican American Educators Journal

    AMAE Open Issue Association of Mexican American Educators Journal

    Association of Mexican American Educators Journal A peer-reviewed, open access journal Volume 13 Issue 1 2019 AMAE Open Issue Editors Patricia Sánchez The University of Texas at San Antonio Antonio J. Camacho AMAE, Inc. Associate Editors Julie L. Figueroa Sacramento State Lucila D. Ek The University of Texas at San Antonio http://amaejournal.utsa.edu ISSN: 2377-9187 Núñez, Cruz Lopez, Sarmiento Hernández, & Smedley La Lucha Sigue: Making the Case for Institutional Support of Undocumented and DACAmented Students in Higher Education Vanessa Núñez Esmeralda C. Cruz Lopez Mariana Sarmiento Hernández Anna C. Smedley University of Nevada, Las Vegas Abstract This project used a Community-Based Participatory Research (CBPR) approach to explore the experiences of undocumented and DACAmented college students in Southern Nevada. CBPR is a collaborative approach to research that involves members of the community being studied to be a part of the entire research process and builds on the strengths of the community. Relying heavily on the knowledge and voices of our community partners, the UndocuNetwork, we conducted interviews with undocumented and DACAmented student activists about their experiences in higher education. We discuss the findings from in-depth interviews with twelve undocumented and DACAmented student activists who are leading the movement at the University of Nevada, Las Vegas to make higher education more accessible and supportive of undocumented and DACAmented students. The questions were written broadly to foster discussion on three main topics: institutional activism, access and barriers to student resources, and campus climate. Participants shared a sense of responsibility to engage in institutional change work, and embraced their agency and exhibited resiliency for navigating higher education through their peer support network.
  • Ensuring Health and Justice for Undocumented Boys and Men of Color 3 TABLE of CONTENTS

    Ensuring Health and Justice for Undocumented Boys and Men of Color 3 TABLE of CONTENTS

    ENSURING HEALTH AND JUSTICE forUNDOCUMENTED BOYS AND MEN OF COLOR ENSURING HEALTH AND JUSTICE forUNDOCUMENTED BOYS AND MEN OF COLOR Erika Cabato, MPH • Bridges to Health Fellow Anthony Galace • Bridges to Health Director MAY 2016 • BRIDGES TO HEALTH ACKNOWLEDGMENTS About the Greenlining Institute Founded in 1993, The Greenlining Institute envisions a nation where communities of color thrive and race is never a barrier to economic opportunity. Because people of color will be the majority of our population by 2044, America will prosper only if communities of color prosper. Greenlining advances economic opportunity and empowerment for people of color through advocacy, community and coalition building, research, and leadership development. We work on a variety of major policy issues, from the economy to environmental policy, civic engagement and many others, because economic opportunity doesn’t operate in a vacuum. Rather than seeing these issues as being in separate silos, Greenlining views them as interconnected threads in a web of opportunity. The Greenlining Institute Bridges to Health Program Nothing is more essential than our health. Everybody should have access to good health regardless of race or income. Health care must be responsive to the nation’s growing communities of color, but health care is not enough. People also need access to the things that lead to good health such as safe neighborhoods, healthy foods, clean environments and decent jobs. Greenlining brings the voices of communities of color into critical decisions that affect all of our lives and health. About the Authors Erika Cabato, MPH, Bridges to Health Fellow Erika is a recent graduate from San Diego State University Graduate School of Public Health.