Wrap up 2016 General Legislative Session
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
2012 Utah Taxpayers Association Legislative Scorecard
March 2012 2012 Utah Taxpayers Association Legislative Scorecard The Utah Taxpayers Association annually issues legislative report cards to its members and the public. The 2012 scorecard rates Utah’s 104 legislators on fourteen key taxpayer related bills. In the House, six bills supported by the Taxpayers Association received no dissenting votes, therefore the lowest possible score for a Utah Representative (unless there were absences) is 43%. In the Senate, six bills passed without a dissenting vote meaning the lowest possible Senate score (unless there were absences) is 50%. Senate Summary The average score in the Senate is 84%. Four senators received a perfect, 100% score: Michael Waddoups, Scott Jenkins, Steve Urquhart and Howard Stephenson, all Republicans. Ben McAdams (82%) and Gene Davis (80%) are the highest scoring Democrats. No senators scored below 50%. The lowest scoring Republicans are Kevin Van Tassell (67%), David Hinkins (70%), and Allen Christensen (75%). The lowest scoring Democrats are Luz Robles (64%), Ross Romero (67%) and Karen Morgan (67%). House Summary The average score in the House is 73%. Four representatives received a perfect, 100% score: Craig Frank, Brad Galvez, John Mathis, and Mike Morley, all Republicans. Mark Wheatley (62%) and Janice Fisher (58%) are the highest scoring Democrats. The lowest scoring Republicans are Mel Brown (50%) and Kay McIff (58%). As Chair of Executive Appropriations Mel Brown missed a number of unanimous votes which artificially lowers his score. The lowest scoring Democrats are David Litvack (45%), Brian King (50%) and Joel Briscoe (50%). Key An upper case “Y” or “N” in GREEN indicates a vote in support of the Taxpayers Association’s position. -
Office of the Legislative Auditor General
OSTATEff OFi UTceAH of the Legislative Auditor General 315 HOUSE BUILDING • PO BOX 145315 • SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84114-5315 (801) 538-1033 • FAX (801) 538-1063 Audit Subcommittee of the Legislative Management Committee President Wayne L. Niederhauser, Co–Chair • Speaker Greg Hughes, Co–Chair JOHN M. SCHAFF, CIA Senator Gene Davis • Representative Brian S. King AUDITOR GENERAL February 3, 2016 Senator David Hinkins, Chair Representative Ken Ivory, Chair Public Utilities and Technology Interim Committee Utah State Capitol Complex Salt Lake City, UT 84114 Dear Senator Hinkins and Representative Ivory: Enclosed are copies of the legislative audit report #2016-02, A Review of the Administration of 911 Surcharges. In accordance with Utah Code 36-12-8, the Legislative Audit Subcommittee passed a motion referring this audit report to your committee for further review and action as appropriate. The audit report was also referred to Executive Offices and Criminal Justice Appropriations Subcommittee, but your committee is designated as the lead committee, so we would like a response from you. The Legislative Auditor General and staff have done extensive work and used valuable resources to perform the audit in a professional and thorough manner. The best response from your committee will be to arrive at some conclusion on the issues raised and recommendations made in the report. Therefore, for each recommendation to the Legislature we ask that your committee reach one of the following conclusions, or some combination of the three, by a motion and a vote: · Draft legislation for the upcoming 2016 Legislative General Session for those issues you find to be sufficiently important · Conclude that the issues are significant but that more time is needed to develop solutions and consensus · Conclude that there is insufficient committee support to study the issues further In addition, for other (non-legislative) recommendations we ask that as part of your oversight role you determine whether appropriate action is being taken to address the audit findings. -
Utah's Official Voter Information Pamphlet
UTAH’S OFFICIAL VOTER INFORMATION PAMPHLET 2018 GENERAL ELECTION TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 6TH NOTE: This electronic version of the voter information pamphlet contains general voting information for all Utah voters. To view voting information that is specific to you, visit VOTE.UTAH.GOV, enter your address, and click on “Sample Ballot, Profiles, Issues.” For audio & braille versions of the voter information pamphlet, please visit blindlibrary.utah.gov. STATE OF UTAH OFFICE OF THE LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR SPENCER J. COX LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR Dear Utah Voter, My office is pleased to present the 2018 Voter Information Pamphlet. Please take the time to read through the material to learn more about the upcoming General Election on November 6, 2018. Inside you will find information about candidates, ballot questions, judges, and how to vote. In addition to this pamphlet, you can visit VOTE.UTAH.GOV to find even more information about the election. At VOTE.UTAH.GOV you can view your sample ballot, find your polling location, and view biographies for the candidates in your area. If you need assistance of any kind, please call us at 1-800-995-VOTE, email [email protected], or stop by our office in the State Capitol building. Thank you for doing your part to move our democracy forward. Sincerely, Spencer J. Cox Lieutenant Governor WHAT’S IN THIS PAMPHLET? 1. WHO ARE THE CANDIDATES? 2 U.S. Senate 3 U.S. House of Representatives 5 Utah State Legislature 9 Utah State Board of Education 28 2. WHAT ARE THE QUESTIONS ON MY BALLOT? 30 Constitutional Amendment A 32 Constitutional Amendment B 35 Constitutional Amendment C 39 Nonbinding Opinion Question Number 1 44 Proposition Number 2 45 Proposition Number 3 66 Proposition Number 4 74 3. -
Result Release
YOUR UTAH. YOUR FUTURE. Survey Results for Agriculture 1 YOUR UTAH. YOUR FUTURE. Executive Summary Utahns want to protect and increase food production in our State. • Current circumstances: • Utah’s food production has declined precipitously to where Utah now produces only 2% of its vegetables, 3% of its fruit, 25% of its dairy, 98% of its grains, and 135% of its protein needs, in part because the current land development process incentivizes the loss of water and land for farming. • These percentages could further decline significantly as Utah’s population nearly doubles and we lose more prime farmland by 2050. • Survey findings: • Ninety-eight percent of Utahns want to increase food self-sufficiency from agriculture by putting more land into production and/or changing crops to fruits and vegetables. • To do that, Utahns are willing to: • Cut back on watering their lawns and gardens to ensure we have enough water for agriculture • Avoid building on high-quality farmland • Spend more money to bring non-agricultural water to urban areas • Utahns do not want to take water or land from agriculture. 2 YOUR UTAH. YOUR FUTURE. Table of Contents Executive Summary 2 Agriculture Action Team Background 4 Agriculture Action Team Members 5 YUYF Survey Background 6 Survey Methodology 12 Utah Agriculture Values 21 YUYF Scenarios on Agriculture 24 YUYF Agriculture Results 31 Supporting Results 37 You May Still Take the Survey 40 3 YOUR UTAH. YOUR FUTURE. The agriculture action team worked for 18 months to create scenarios for the future of agriculture in Utah. Agriculture, Public Lands, Your Utah, Your Future & Recreation Action Team Utah Quality of Life Values Study Scenarios & Choices 2013 2014 2015 Envision Utah and Governor Herbert invited The values study found that agriculture The action team worked for 18 months to agriculture, public lands, and recreation has become increasingly important to research and model what Utah’s agricultural experts from across the state to join the Utahns across the state. -
Resolution on Common Core State Standards and Assessments
Resolution on Common Core State Standards and Assessments WHEREAS, The Common Core State Standards Initiative (“Common Core”), also known as “Utah’s Core,”1 is not a Utah state standards initiative, but rather a set of inferior nationally-based standards and tests developed through a collaboration between two NGO’s (non-governmental organizations) and unelected boards and consortia from outside the state of Utah;2 and, WHEREAS, Common Core was financed with private foundation funds,3 replacing the influence of our votes with wealth and influence to bypass our state legislature and impose control over Utah’s education standards and tests;4 and, WHEREAS, Common Core binds us to an established copyright over standards, from which we cannot subtract, replace or add to - beyond an additional 15%;5 and, WHEREAS, the General Educational Provisions Act 6 prohibits federal authority over curriculum and testing, yet the U.S. Department of Education’s “Cooperative Agreements”7 confirm8 Common Core’s test-building 9and data collection10 is federally managed;11 and, WHEREAS, “student behavior indicators”12 - which include testing13 for mental health, social and cultural (i.e. religious) habits and attitudes14 and family status - are now being used for Common Core tests and assessments; and, WHEREAS, Common Core violates Utah15 state and federal privacy laws16 by requiring the storage and sharing17 of private18 student19 and family data without consent;20 using a pre- school through post-graduate (P-20) tracking system and a federally- funded State -
2014 Legislative Wrap Up
Utah League of Cities and Towns 2014 General Legislative Session Wrap Up Wrap General Legislative 2014 1 ULCT Legislative Team Session Kenneth H. Bullock, Executive Director [email protected] Ken has worked for ULCT for 29 years and is responsible for the overall management of League operations and activities. He works closely with the ULCT Board of Directors, represents ULCT on various committees and boards, and communicates regularly with government officials, business leaders, and the public. Lincoln Shurtz, Director of Legislative Affairs [email protected] Lincoln has worked for ULCT for 15 years and coordinates ULCT policy outreach, administers the Legislative Policy Committee, & presents findings to state administrative and legislative branches. He specializes in the Utah state budget, transportation, economic development, and retirement issues. Jodi Hoffman, Land Use Analyst [email protected] Jodi has worked for ULCT for 11 years and for municipal government for over 25 years. She specializes in municipal land use and water issues. Roger Tew, Senior Policy Analyst [email protected] Roger has worked for ULCT for 18 years and within the state government structure for 35 years. He specializes in public utilities, judicial issues, tax policy, and telecommunications policy. Cameron Diehl, Policy Analyst/Attorney [email protected] Cameron has worked for ULCT for 6 years and coordinates LPC correspondence and organization. He specializes in federal relations, environmental policy, election law, and every other conceivable political issue. Nick Jarvis, Research Analyst [email protected] Nick has been with ULCT for 4 years and oversees the budget database and other research. Satin Tashnizi Legislative Intern [email protected] Satin was ULCT’s intern during the session and managed our logistics and sanity. -
2014 Political Corporate Contributions 2-19-2015.Xlsx
2014 POLITICAL CORPORATE CONTRIBUTIONS Last Name First Name Committee Name State Office District Party 2014 Total ($) Alabama 2014 PAC AL Republican 10,000 Free Enterprise PAC AL 10,000 Mainstream PAC AL 10,000 Collins Charles Charlie Collins Campaign Committee AR Representative AR084 Republican 750 Collins‐Smith Linda Linda Collins‐Smith Campaign Committee AR Senator AR019 Democratic 1,050 Davis Andy Andy Davis Campaign Committee AR Representative AR031 Republican 750 Dotson Jim Jim Dotson Campaign Committee AR Representative AR093 Republican 750 Griffin Tim Tim Griffin Campaign Committee AR Lt. Governor AR Republican 2,000 Rapert Jason Jason Rapert Campaign Committee AR Senator AR035 Republican 1,000 Rutledge Leslie Leslie Rutledge Campaign Committee AR Attorney General AR Republican 2,000 Sorvillo Jim Jim Sorvillo Campaign Committee AR Representative AR032 Republican 750 Williams Eddie Joe GoEddieJoePAC AR Senator AR029 Republican 5,000 Growing Arkansas AR Republican 5,000 Senate Victory PAC AZ Republican 2,500 Building Arizona's Future AZ Democratic 5,000 House Victory PAC AZ Republican 2,500 Allen Travis Re‐Elect Travis Allen for Assembly 2014 CA Representative CA072 Republican 1,500 Anderson Joel Tax Fighters for Joel Anderson, Senate 2014 CA Senator CA038 Republican 2,500 Berryhill Tom Tom Berryhill for Senate 2014 CA Senator CA008 Republican 2,500 Bigelow Frank Friends of Frank Bigelow for Assembly 2014 CA Representative CA005 Republican 2,500 Bonin Mike Mike Bonin for City Council 2013 Officeholder Account CA LA City Council -
Legislative Policy Committee
Legislative Policy Committee December 14, 2020 Agenda 1. Legislative logistics 2. Housing 3. Public safety 4. Fees 5. Other legislation 6. Outreach 7. Homework 8. Recognition of Governor Herbert Legislative Outlook Unprecedented 2021 session! VALUE PILLARS Policy Tiers Green: update to tier Tier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3 Water conservation Land Use Task Force: Land Use Task Force: Rainy day funds -PID -Annexation/incorporation Housing: -Annexation/incorporation -Low impact development Gun preemption -Building fees -Gravel pits -Development agreements -Impact fees -Low impact development -Water provider review of plat State homeless coordinator/plan -ADU -Development agreements -Building permits/vesting -Permitting & inspection authority -Water provider review of plat -Impact fees Anonymous code complaints -HRZ, other affordable housing tools -Building permits/vesting -Boundary line adjustment -Impact fees -Land use training Eminent domain Trust in public safety: -Boundary line adjustment -Officer discipline process -Land use training Convention and tourism Enterprise funds -Training assessment -Data collection Transportation/Air quality Emergency authority ULCT will engage on bills that impact trust & ULCT prism GIA and notice of claim Rainy day funds Marijuana, tobacco (land use, licensing) Municipal fees and taxes (in general) State homeless coordinator/plan Gun preemption Economic development/incentives Fireworks Metro Townships JRI investment CRA/RDA (Sen. Harper) Public safety individual privacy EMS Legal notice/print news Transportation utility -
2009 Utah Taxpayers Association Legislative Scorecard
2009 Utah Taxpayers Association Legislative Scorecard The Utah Taxpayers Association annually issues legislative report cards to its members and the public. The 2009 scorecard rates Utah’s 104 legislators on 17 key tax and spending related bills in the House and 16 in the Senate. Because HJR 8 is such an important taxpayer issue, we have applied a double weight to that vote. In the House, six of the bills were supported by the Association and passed without a dissenting vote, meaning the lowest possible House score (unless there were absences) on this year’s scorecard was 33.3%. In the Senate, seven of the votes were supported by the Association and passed without a dissenting vote, meaning the lowest possible Senate score (unless there were absences) on this year’s scorecard was 41.1%. House Summary The average score in the House is 72.6%. Four Representatives, all Republicans, scored 100.0%: Rebecca Lockhart, John Dougall and Mike Morley. Janice Fisher and David Litvack were the highest scoring Democrats (58.8%). The Representatives scoring below 50% are Jackie Biskupski (35.3%), Christine Johnson (37.4%), Neil Hansen (37.5%), Larry Wiley (40.0%), Mark Wheatley (41.2%), Christine Watkins (41.2%), James Gowans (41.2%), Rebecca Chavez-Houck (41.2%), Laura Black (41.2%), Jennifer Seelig (43.8%), Jay Seegmiller (47.1%), Marie Poulson (47.1%), Carol Spackman Moss (47.1%), Lynn Hemingway (47.1%), and Susan Duckworth (47.1%). The Representatives scoring below 50% are Democrats. Jim Bird (52.9%) was the lowest scoring Republican. Other low scoring Republicans include Kay McIff (64.7%), Fred Hunsaker (64.7%), Rebecca Edwards (68.8%) and Sheryl Allen (68.8%). -
2021 State Legislator Pledge Signers
I pledge that, as a member of the state legislature, I will cosponsor, vote for, and defend the resolution applying for an Article V convention for the sole purpose of enacting term limits on Congress. The U.S. Term Limits Article V Pledge Signers 2021 State Legislators 1250 Connecticut Ave NW Suite 200 ALABAMA S022 David Livingston H073 Karen Mathiak Washington, D.C. 20036 Successfully passed a term S028 Kate Brophy McGee H097 Bonnie Rich (202) 261-3532 limits only resolution. H098 David Clark termlimits.org CALIFORNIA H103 Timothy Barr ALASKA H048 Blanca Rubio H104 Chuck Efstration H030 Ron Gillham H105 Donna McLeod COLORADO H110 Clint Crowe ARKANSAS H016 Andres Pico H119 Marcus Wiedower H024 Bruce Cozart H022 Margo Herzl H131 Beth Camp H042 Mark Perry H039 Mark Baisley H141 Dale Washburn H071 Joe Cloud H048 Tonya Van Beber H147 Heath Clark H049 Michael Lynch H151 Gerald Greene ARIZONA H060 Ron Hanks H157 Bill Werkheiser H001 Noel Campbell H062 Donald Valdez H161 Bill Hitchens H001 Judy Burges H063 Dan Woog H162 Carl Gilliard H001 Quang Nguyen H064 Richard Holtorf H164 Ron Stephens H002 Andrea Dalessandro S001 Jerry Sonnenberg H166 Jesse Petrea H002 Daniel Hernandez S010 Larry Liston H176 James Burchett H003 Alma Hernandez S023 Barbara Kirkmeyer H177 Dexter Sharper H005 Leo Biasiucci H179 Don Hogan H006 Walter Blackman CONNECTICUT S008 Russ Goodman H007 Arlando Teller H132 Brian Farnen S013 Carden Summers H008 David Cook H149 Kimberly Fiorello S017 Brian Strickland H011 Mark Finchem S021 Brandon Beach H012 Travis Grantham FLORIDA S027 Greg Dolezal H014 Gail Griffin Successfully passed a term S030 Mike Dugan H015 Steve Kaiser limits only resolution. -
April 2017 Newsletter
1 April 2017 Volume 42 Issue 4 THE UTAH TAXPAYER A Publication of the Utah Taxpayers Association If Congress Acts, What Will APRIL 2017 Volume 42 Federal Tax Reform Look Like? With Congress’s failure to repeal and replace the Affordable If Congress Acts, What Will Care Act, attention in Washington, D.C. appears to be turning Federal Tax Reform Look towards federal tax reform. This is a needed change as the Like? Page 1 United States has not seen any comprehensive tax reform since My Corner: Employed by 1986. The nation’s economy has evolved since the 1980’s and Page 2 Utah’s Tax Watchdog for 40 the tax code needs to be reformed to match the economic Years activity of today’s world. Page 2 Currently the federal tax code imposes high marginal rates on 2017 Legislative Session: A both businesses and individuals. According to the Washington, Page 4 D.C. based Tax Foundation, the United States has one of the Mixed Bag of Success, Tax Increases Page 5 highest corporate income tax rates in the world. Significant tax reform would be targeted at lowering those rates. The struggle 2017 Legislative Scorecard for the reform will be how to do it such that it best benefits the Released, 34 “Friend of the United States overall. Taxpayer” Awarded Page 7 The U.S. tax system is complex. The Tax Foundation has stated that individuals spent 8.9 billion hours complying with Utah’s Income Tax Rate the Internal Revenue Tax Code in 2016 and figures that the Ranks Second Highest total cost for tax compliance in 2016 was $409 billion. -
Verizon Political Contributions January – December 2012
VERIZON POLITICAL CONTRIBUTIONS JANUARY – DECEMBER 2012 1 Verizon Political Contributions January – December 2012 A Message from Craig Silliman Verizon is affected by a wide variety of government policies ‐‐ from telecommunications regulation to taxation to health care and more ‐‐ that have an enormous impact on the business climate in which we operate. We owe it to our shareowners, employees and customers to advocate public policies that will enable us to compete fairly and freely in the marketplace. Political contributions are one way we support the democratic electoral process and participate in the policy dialogue. Our employees have established political action committees at the federal level and in 20 states. These political action committees (PACs) allow employees to pool their resources to support candidates for office who generally support the public policies our employees advocate. This report lists all PAC contributions, corporate political contributions, support for ballot initiatives and independent expenditures made by Verizon in 2012. The contribution process is overseen by the Corporate Governance and Policy Committee of our Board of Directors, which receives a comprehensive report and briefing on these activities at least annually. We intend to update this voluntary disclosure twice a year and publish it on our corporate website. We believe this transparency with respect to our political spending is in keeping with our commitment to good corporate governance and a further sign of our responsiveness to the interests of our shareowners. Craig L. Silliman Senior Vice President, Public Policy 2 Verizon Political Contributions January – December 2012 Political Contributions Policy: Our Voice in the Political Process What are the Verizon Good Government Clubs? and the government agencies administering the federal and individual state election laws.