Bedrock Geology and Mineral Resources of the Knoxville 1°X2° Quadrangle, Tennessee, North Carolina, and South Carolina

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Bedrock Geology and Mineral Resources of the Knoxville 1°X2° Quadrangle, Tennessee, North Carolina, and South Carolina Bedrock Geology and Mineral Resources of the Knoxville 1°x2° Quadrangle, Tennessee, North Carolina, and South Carolina By G.R. ROBINSON, Jr., F.G. LESURE, J.I. MARLOWE II, N.K. FOLEY, and S.H. CLARK U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1979 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR MANUEL LUJAN/ Jr./ Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Dallas L. Peck, Director Any use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE: 1992 For sale by Book and Open-File Report Sales U.S. Geological Survey Federal Center, Box 25286 Denver, CO 80225 Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Bedrock geology and mineral resources of the Knoxville 1°x2° quadrangle Tennessee, North Carolina, and South Carolina / by G.R. Robinson, Jr. ... [etaf.]. p. cm.-(U.S. Geological Survey bulletin ; 1979) Includes bibliographical references. Supt. of Docs. no.: I 19.3:1979 1. Geology—Tennessee. 2. Geology—North Carolina. 3. Geology—South Carolina. 4. Mines and mineral resources—Tennessee. 5. Mines and mineral resources—North Carolina. 6. Mines and mineral resources- South Carolina. I. Robinson, G.R. II. Series. QE75.B9 no. 1979 [QE 165] 557.3 s-dc20 91-592 [577.68] CIP CONTENTS Abstract 1 Description of the Area 2 Geography 2 National Park, National Forest, and Indian Lands 5 Wilderness, Wilderness Study, and Roadless Areas 5 Geology of the Knoxville Quadrangle 7 Introduction 7 Previous Work 7 Geologic Overview 7 Inner Piedmont Lithotectonic Belt 10 Blue Ridge 13 East Flank Blue Ridge Lithotectonic Belt 14 Helen Thrust Sheet 15 Amphibolitic Basement Complex and Richard Russell Thrust Sheet 15 Tallulah Falls Thrust Sheet 16 Central Blue Ridge and Proterozoic Portion of the West Flank Blue Ridge 17 Ocoee Supergroup 17 Murphy Belt 18 Valley and Ridge and Paleozoic Portion of the West Flank Blue Ridge 19 Late Proterozoic to Early Ordovician 19 Middle Ordovician to Devonian 20 Late Devonian and Mississippian 20 Structure 20 Metamorphism 20 Geologic Summary 22 Mineral Resources 26 Introduction 26 Construction Materials 26 Cement 27 Common Clay and Shale 28 Crushed Stone 28 Dimension Stone 29 Lightweight Aggregate 30 Limestone and Dolomite 30 Sand and Gravel 30 Industrial Minerals 31 Mineral Commodities Related to Mafic and Ultramafic Rocks 31 Asbestos 39 Chromite 39 Corundum 39 Nickel 40 Olivine 40 Platinum-Group Elements 40 Soapstone and Talc 40 Vermiculite 41 Mineral Commodities Related to Granite and Pegmatite 42 Pegmatite Deposits 45 Pegmatite Districts 46 Spruce Pine District 46 Woodlawn District 46 Buncombe District 46 Bryson City District 47 Franklin-Sylva District 47 Cashiers District 47 Feldspar 47 Kaolin 48 Mica 48 Quartz 49 Zircon 49 Other Industrial Minerals 49 Barite 49 Fluorspar 51 Garnet 51 Gem Stones 52 Graphite 53 Kyanite Group of Minerals 53 Phosphate 54 Rutile 55 Oil and Gas Potential 55 Metallic Resources 56 Base Metals (Copper, Lead, Zinc, and Iron) 56 Precious Metals (Gold, Silver, and PGE's) 60 Manganese 61 Vanadium 61 Thorium and Rare-Earth Elements 61 Uranium 62 Tungsten 62 Acknowledgments 62 References Cited 62 PLATES [Plates are in pocket] 1. Preliminary bedrock geologic map of the Knoxville l°x2° quadrangle, Tennessee, North Carolina, and South Carolina 2. Paleozoic metamorphic facies map of the Knoxville l°x2° quadrangle FIGURES 1-2. Maps showing: 1. Location of the Knoxville l°x2° quadrangle, with State and county boundaries 2 2. Physiographic provinces of the Appalachian region 3 3. Knoxville l°x2° quadrangle showing available 7 1/2-min topographic maps 4 4. Areas of National Forest, National Park, and Indian lands in the Knoxville \°x2° quadrangle, with wilderness, wilderness study, and roadless areas 6 5. Areal coverage of geologic mapping at a scale of 1:24,000 or larger in the Knoxville quadrangle 12 6. Areal coverage of geologic mapping at a scale of 1:25,000 to 1:62,500 in the Knoxville quadrangle 12 7. Areal coverage of geologic mapping at a scale of 1:63,360 to 1:125,000 in the Knoxville quadrangle 12 8. Named faults and windows of the Knoxville quadrangle 13 9. Generalized lithotectonic map of the Knoxville quadrangle 14 10. Subunits of the east flank of the Blue Ridge 16 11. Distribution of Middle Proterozoic crystalline rock and rocks of the Late Proterozoic Ocoee Supergroup in the Blue Ridge 17 12. Age of metamorphism 23 13. Generalized tectonics of the Knoxville quadrangle 24 14. Areas of limestone, dolomite, and marble resources in the Knoxville quadrangle 29 15. Localities of rock samples analyzed for platinum-group elements, southern part of the Knoxville quadrangle 42 16. Pegmatite districts and outlying pegmatites in the Southern Appalachians 44 17. Areas containing pegmatite resources and granite suitable for feldspar production in the Knoxville quadrangle 45 18. Areas containing resources of garnet, graphite, kyanite, quartz, rutile, sillimanite, and zircon in the Knoxville quadrangle 50 19. Areas ofbarite and fluorite resources in the Knoxville quadrangle 51 20. Areas having a low potential for phosphate deposits 54 21. Location of detrital monazite belts in the Knoxville quadrangle and vicinity 62 TABLES 1. Ages of igneous rocks in the Knoxville quadrangle and vicinity, by lithotectonic belt 8 2. References for geologic map coverage as shown in figures 5, 6, and 7 11 3. Mineral commodities produced in or near the Knoxville l°x2° quadrangle by State and county 27 4. Recorded production of gold and silver from counties all or partly within the Knoxville l°x2° quadrangle 28 5. Summary of high-magnesium and ultramafic rock deposits that have been mined or prospected for various mineral commodities 32 6. Olivine resources in the Knoxville l°x2° quadrangle 41 7. Palladium, platinum, and rhodium contents of various rock types from the Blue Ridge in the Knoxville l°x2° quadrangle 43 8. Deposit types, location, and geologic setting of the larger mines and metal occurrences in the Knoxville l°x2° quadrangle 57 Bedrock Geology and Mineral Resources of the Knoxville 1°x2° Quadrangle, Tennessee, North Carolina, and South Carolina By G.R. Robinson/ Jr./ F.G. Lesure, J.I. Marlow II, N.K. Foley, and S.H. Clark Abstract regional metamorphism except for a zone of retrograde rocks in the Brevard fault zone and a small area of The Knoxville 1°x2° quadrangle spans the Southern biotite-grade rocks in the extreme southwest part of the Blue Ridge physiographic province at its widest point from Grandfather Mountain window in the northeast corner of eastern Tennessee across western North Carolina to the the quadrangle. northwest corner of South Carolina. The quadrangle also The major mineral resources in the Knoxville 1°x2° contains small parts of the Valley and Ridge province in quadrangle are construction materials and a variety of Tennessee and the Piedmont province in North and South industrial minerals mostly related to either granite and Carolina. Bedrock in the Valley and Ridge consists of unmetamorphosed, folded and thrust-faulted Paleozoic pegmatite or ultramafic rocks. Past production in the miogeoclinal sedimentary rocks ranging in age from quadrangle of metals, which are of secondary importance Cambrian to Mississippian. The Blue Ridge is a complex of relative to construction materials and industrial minerals, stacked thrust sheets divided into three parts: (1) a west include copper in massive sulfides of the Besshi type, flank underlain by rocks of the Late Proterozoic and Early gold-bearing quartz veins, and residual iron and Cambrian Chilhowee Group and slightly metamorphosed manganese deposits. Resources are discussed in relation Late Proterozoic Ocoee Supergroup west of the Green­ to the Valley and Ridge, Blue Ridge, and Piedmont prov­ brier fault; (2) a central part containing crystalline inces. basement of Middle Proterozoic age (Grenville), Ocoee The following resources are the most important: Supergroup rocks east of the Greenbrier fault, and rocks A. Construction materials: of the Murphy belt; and (3) an east flank containing the 1. Dimension stone of the Tennessee marble district in Helen, Tallulah Falls, and Richard Russell thrust sheets and the Valley and Ridge. the amphibolitic basement complex. All of the east flank 2. Limestone and dolomite of the Valley and Ridge. thrust sheets contain polydeformed and metamorphosed 3. Sand and gravel and crushed stone, widespread sedimentary and igneous rocks of mostly Proterozoic age. throughout the quadrangle. The Blue Ridge is separated by the Brevard fault zone from B. Industrial minerals: a large area of rocks of the Inner Piedmont to the east, 1. Feldspar, flake mica, and quartz produced by which contains the Six Mile thrust sheet and the Chauga- flotation methods from the Spruce Pine Alaskite Walhalla thrust complex. All of these rocks are also (muscovite granodiorite) in the east flank of the Blue polydeformed and metamorphosed sedimentary and Ridge. The district produces about half of the U.S. igneous rocks. The Inner Piedmont rocks in this area feldspar and significant amounts of the U.S. flake occupy both the Piedmont and part of the Blue Ridge mica. physiographic provinces. 2. Olivine produced from alpine-type dunite bodies in The intensity of deformation and metamorphism the east flank of the Blue Ridge. increases from west to east in the Blue Ridge. The west 3. Talc and marble from the Murphy belt in the central flank is mostly chlorite grade or relatively unmetamor­ part of the Blue Ridge, phosed, and the central part of the Blue Ridge is mostly 4. Vermiculite produced from a large deposit near staurolite, garnet, or biotite grade, although sillimanite Tigerville, S.C-, in the Inner Piedmont. Deposit grade rocks occur along the eastern part of the central worked out and mine backfilled. Smaller deposits Blue Ridge in the vicinity of the leading edge of the associated with ultramafic rocks in the east flank of Hayesvil Ie fault.
Recommended publications
  • Jomeokee Geology. Pilot Mountain State Park: an Environmental Education Learning Experience Designed for Grades 9-12
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 376 053 SE 055 110 AUTHOR Smith, Michael TITLE Jomeokee Geology. Pilot Mountain State Park: An Environmental Education Learning Experience Designed for Grades 9-12. INSTITUTION North Carolina State Dept. of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources, Raleigh. PUB DATE Aug 94 NOTE 71p. PUB TYPE Guides Non-Classroom Use (055) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC03 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS Conservation (Environment); Earth Science; Environmental Education; Experiential Learning; *Geology; Geophysics; High Schools; Learning Activities; *Minerals; *Outdoor Education IDENTIFIERS *Environmental Awareness; Erosion; Geologic Time; Pilot Mountain State Park NC; *Rocks ABSTRACT This activity packet provides educators with a series of hands-on classroom and outdoor education activities for grades 9-12 that focus on geology using the Pilot Mountain State Park. The packet was designed to meet established curriculum objectives of the North Carolina Department of Public Instruction's Standard Course of Study. Three types of activities are included:(1) pre-visit classroom activities provide background and vocabulary development; (2) on-site activities conducted at the park; and (3) post-visit classroom activities to reinforce concepts, skills, and vocabulary. This learning experience exposes students to the major concepts of classes of rocks, physical properties of rocks and minerals, formation of rocks and minerals, weathering and erosion, geologic processes, rock and mineral identification, rock cycles, and geologic time. The packet contains an introduction to the geologic history of Pilot Mountain; an activity summary; pre-visit, on-site, and post-visit activity objectives and instructions; a glossary; a list of 14 references; a scheduling worksheet and program evaluation form; and instructions on conducting a daily meal production plan.
    [Show full text]
  • Physical and Chemical Tests of the Commercial Marbles of the United
    DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Technologic Papers of THE Bureau of Standards S. W. STRATTON, Director No. 123 PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL TESTS ON THE COMMERCIAL MARBLES OF THE UNITED STATES BY D. W. KESSLER, Assistant Engineer Physicist Bureau of Standards ISSUED JULY 15, 1919 PRICE, 15 CENTS Sold only by the Superintendent of Documents, Government Printing Office Washington, D. C. WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1919 1 PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL TESTS ON THE COM- MERCIAL MARBLES OF THE UNITED STATES By D. W. Kessler CONTENTS Page I. Introduction 3 II. Purpose of stone testing 4 III. Selection of samples for test 6 IV. Preparation of test specimens 7 V. Compression tests 8 VI. Transverse strength tests 1 VII. Tensile tests 12 VIII. Effect of freezing and thawing 13 IX. Effect of soaking in water 15 X. Effect of repeated temperature changes 16 XI. Absorption tests 17 XII. Apparent specific gravity 19 XIII. True specific gravity 21 XIV. Porosity 22 XV. Staining tests 22 XVI. Permeability tests 23 XVII. Chemical analysis 24 XVIII. Volume-resistivity tests 25 XIX. Carbonic-acid tests 26 XX. Thermal expansion of marble 28 XXI. Warping of marble 31 XXII. The sample collection 32 XXIII. Summary 33 XXIV. Tables 1 to 12 34 I. INTRODUCTION In the year 19 14 plans were made by the United States Geo- logical Survey, Bureau of Mines, Office of Public Roads, and the Bureau of Standards for a cooperative study of the various deposits of stone in the United States. The part of this work undertaken by the Bureau of Standards is the determination of the physical and chemical properties of the stone to establish its value for use in masonry structures.
    [Show full text]
  • North Carolina STATE PARKS
    North Carolina STATE PARKS North Carolina Department of Conservation and Development Division of State Parks North Carolina State Parks A guide to the areas set aside and maintained taining general information about the State as State Parks for the enjoyment of North Parks as a whole and brief word-and-picture Carolina's citizens and their guests — con- descriptions of each. f ) ) ) ) YOUR STATE PARKS THE STATE PARKS described in this well planned, well located, well equipped and booklet are the result of planning and well maintained State Parks are a matter of developing over a number of years. justifiable pride in which every citizen has Endowed by nature with ideal sites that a share. This is earned by your cooperation range from the shores of the Atlantic Ocean in observing the lenient rules and leaving the to the tops of the Blue Ridge Mountains, facilities and grounds clean and orderly. the State has located its State Parks for easy Keep this guide book for handy reference- access as well as for varied appeal. They use your State Parks year 'round for health- offer a choice of homelike convenience and ful recreation and relaxation! comfort in sturdy, modern facilities . the hardy outdoor life of tenting and camp cook- Amos R. Kearns, Chairman ing ... or the quick-and-easy freedom of a Hugh M. Morton, Vice Chairman day's picnicking. The State Parks offer excel- Walter J. Damtoft lent opportunities for economical vacations— Eric W. Rodgers either in the modern, fully equipped vacation Miles J. Smith cabins or in the campgrounds.
    [Show full text]
  • Inner Piedmont Geology in the South Mountains-Blue Ridge Foothills and the Southwestern Brushy Mountains, Central- Western North Carolina
    Inner Piedmont geology in the South Mountains-Blue Ridge Foothills and the southwestern Brushy Mountains, central- western North Carolina Tenness y of ee–K sit n er ox iv vi n ll Carolina Geological Society U e Annual Field Trip Tectonics Research October 19-20, 2002 S e c ci n en le c el e A xc lli f E Guidebook Editors: ance Center o Robert D. Hatcher, Jr. and Brendan R. Bream Field Trip Leaders (in order of appearance): Joseph C. Hill, Brendan R. Bream, Scott D. Giorgis, Scott T. Williams, James L. Kalbas, Arthur J. Merschat, and Russell W. Mapes Acknowledgments and Credits Sponsorship of CGS–2002 (received prior to printing) by: Campbell and Associates, Inc., Columbia, South Carolina Carolina Geological Conultants, Inc., Columbia, South Carolina Central Savannah River Geological Society, Aiken, South Carolina Steve Gurley, Consulting Soil Scientist, Lincolnton, North Carolina Godfrey and Associates, Inc., Blythewood, South Carolina Kubal and Furr, Greenville, South Carolina Zemex Corporation, Spruce Pine, North Carolina Vulcan Materials Company (Jim Stroud, Brad Allison) for access to the Lenoir Quarry. Organization, registering participants, keeping financial records, and guidebook proofreading: Nancy L. Meadows The National Cooperative Mapping Program, EDMAP component grants (administered by the USGS), funded the detailed geologic mapping. Without these grants, none of the petrologic, geochronologic, or other research presented here would be meaningful. Cooperation, encouragement, and field checking by North Carolina Geological Survey geologists: Leonard S. Wiener Carl E. Merschat Mark W. Carter and the cooperation of State Geologist (just retired): Charles H. Gardner Cover Photo: Recording data on a traverse in the South Mountains, winter 1998.
    [Show full text]
  • Building Stones of the National Mall
    The Geological Society of America Field Guide 40 2015 Building stones of the National Mall Richard A. Livingston Materials Science and Engineering Department, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742, USA Carol A. Grissom Smithsonian Museum Conservation Institute, 4210 Silver Hill Road, Suitland, Maryland 20746, USA Emily M. Aloiz John Milner Associates Preservation, 3200 Lee Highway, Arlington, Virginia 22207, USA ABSTRACT This guide accompanies a walking tour of sites where masonry was employed on or near the National Mall in Washington, D.C. It begins with an overview of the geological setting of the city and development of the Mall. Each federal monument or building on the tour is briefly described, followed by information about its exterior stonework. The focus is on masonry buildings of the Smithsonian Institution, which date from 1847 with the inception of construction for the Smithsonian Castle and continue up to completion of the National Museum of the American Indian in 2004. The building stones on the tour are representative of the development of the Ameri­ can dimension stone industry with respect to geology, quarrying techniques, and style over more than two centuries. Details are provided for locally quarried stones used for the earliest buildings in the capital, including A quia Creek sandstone (U.S. Capitol and Patent Office Building), Seneca Red sandstone (Smithsonian Castle), Cockeysville Marble (Washington Monument), and Piedmont bedrock (lockkeeper's house). Fol­ lowing improvement in the transportation system, buildings and monuments were constructed with stones from other regions, including Shelburne Marble from Ver­ mont, Salem Limestone from Indiana, Holston Limestone from Tennessee, Kasota stone from Minnesota, and a variety of granites from several states.
    [Show full text]
  • December 2015 Volume 2 Number 6 Susan Kluttzt Governor Secretary, DNCR Governor Launches Connect NC Campaign at Stone Mountain Gov
    DIGEST www.ncparks.gov Pat McCrory December 2015 Volume 2 Number 6 Susan Kluttzt Governor Secretary, DNCR Governor launches Connect NC campaign at Stone Mountain Gov. Pat McCrory’s launch of the $2 billion Connect NC bond campaign included a stop at Stone Moun- tain State Park Oct. 22, where he signed a ceremonial copy of the 2015 legislation and touted the proposal’s benefits to the state parks system. If approved by voters in March, the Connect NC bonds would direct $75 million to 45 projects in state parks, recreation areas and natural areas across North Carolina. The identified projects include: $20.8 million for new or improved visitor centers and community buildings in 11 parks; $18.8 million for new or expanded campgrounds and cabins in 12 parks; $21.3 million for other visitor facilities in 12 parks; and, $14.1 million for land acquisition at 10 park units. “Today, we are enjoying and benefiting from the invest- ments made by our parents and grandparents,” McCrory said. “New university and community college facilities and improved state parks are long-term investments that will support our growth and make North Carolina more attractive to businesses and residents.” The Governor spoke to a crowd of more than 100 support- ers along a trail below the granite face of Stone Mountain. He introduced Robert Orr, former associate justice of the North Carolina Supreme Court, who heads a bipartisan committee to advocate for passage of the bond referendum. A complete overview of the Connect NC bond proposal is at www.connect.nc.gov.
    [Show full text]
  • TVA-Qualified Data Center Sites: Duffield, VA and Morristown, TN
    Ready-for-Development Data Center Sites in Northeast Tennessee Valley Three sites in the Northeast Tennessee Valley In 2010, the Tennessee Valley Authority engaged joined an elite group of locations identified by a nationally recognized consulting firm to pre- a recent Tennessee Valley Authority sponsored qualify sites within its service area as ready- study as a pre-qualifier for a data center site. for-development for data centers. “Demand Bristol and Morristown, Tennessee and Duffield, for data centers is growing as increased use Virginia were three of only 14 locations in the of electronic commerce and information seven-state Tennessee Valley region to receive technologies requires more data storage space,” the designation. The Northeast Tennessee Valley said John Bradley, senior vice president for TVA region is a 15 county sub-area of the TVA and is Economic Development. “TVA’s goal is to help situated in Northeast Tennessee and Southwest make the region more competitive in attracting Virginia midway between Knoxville, Tennessee and retaining these types of industries, “ Bradley and Roanoke, Virginia. As a pre-qualifier, added. the three sites meet the criteria for electric The consulting firm retained by TVA specialized service, fiber service, site considerations, labor in audit, consulting, financial advisory, risk accessibility and low risk for natural disasters management and tax services. The study all of which are necessary for a data center involved a search for data center-friendly environment, according to the study’s findings. environments including an evaluation of sites with the potential to support data center deployments. The consulting firm The Bristol West site is a 5-acre tract of land in assessed more than 50 sites across TVA’s an upscale business park located off Interstate service area considering factors such as robust 81 near the Tennessee/Virginia border.
    [Show full text]
  • Newfoundland English
    Izaro Zalacain Mendia Degree in English Studies 2019-2020 NEWFOUNDLAND ENGLISH Supervisor: Miren Alazne Landa Departamento de Filología Inglesa, Alemana y de Traducción e Interpretación Área de Filología Inglesa Abstract The English language has undergone many variations, leaving uncountable dialects in every nook and cranny of the world. Located at the north-east of Canada, the island of Newfoundland presents one of those dialects. However, within the many varieties the English language features, Newfoundland English (NE) remains as one of the less researched dialects in North America. The aim of this paper is to provide a characterisation of NE. In order to do so, this paper focuses on research questions on the origins of the dialect, potential variation within NE, the languages it has been in contact with, its particular linguistic features and the role of linguistic distinction in the Newfoundlander identity. Thus, in this paper I firstly assess the origins of NE, which are documented to mainly derive from West Country, England, and south-eastern Ireland, and I also provide an overview of the main historical events that have influenced the language. Secondly, I show the linguistic variation NE features, thus displaying the multiple dialectal areas that are found in the island. Furthermore, I discuss the different languages that have been in contact with the variety, namely, Irish Gaelic and Micmac, among others. Thirdly, I present a variety of linguistic features of NE -both phonetic and morphosyntactic- that distinguish the dialect from the rest of North American varieties, including Canadian English. Finally, I tackle the issue of language and identity and uncover a number of innovations and purposeful uses of certain features that the islanders show in their speech for the sake of identity marking.
    [Show full text]
  • The Future of Knoxville's Past
    Th e Future of Knoxville’s Past Historic and Architectural Resources in Knoxville, Tennessee Knoxville Historic Zoning Commission October 2006 Adopted by the Knoxville Historic Zoning Commission on October 19, 2006 and by the Knoxville-Knox County Metropolitan Planning Commission on November 9, 2006 Prepared by the Knoxville-Knox County Metropolitan Planning Commission Knoxville Historic Zoning Commissioners J. Nicholas Arning, Chairman Scott Busby Herbert Donaldson L. Duane Grieve, FAIA William Hoehl J. Finbarr Saunders, Jr. Melynda Moore Whetsel Lila Wilson MPC staff involved in the preparation of this report included: Mark Donaldson, Executive Director Buz Johnson, Deputy Director Sarah Powell, Graphic Designer Jo Ella Washburn, Graphic Designer Charlotte West, Administrative Assistant Th e report was researched and written by Ann Bennett, Senior Planner. Historic photographs used in this document are property of the McClung Historical Collection of the Knox County Public Library System and are used by MPC with much gratitude. TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction . .5 History of Settlement . 5 Archtectural Form and Development . 9 Th e Properties . 15 Residential Historic Districts . .15 Individual Residences . 18 Commercial Historic Districts . .20 Individual Buildings . 21 Schools . 23 Churches . .24 Sites, Structures, and Signs . 24 Property List . 27 Recommenedations . 29 October 2006 Th e Future Of Knoxville’s Past INTRODUCTION that joined it. Development and redevelopment of riverfront In late 1982, funded in part by a grant from the Tennessee sites have erased much of this earlier development, although Historical Commission, MPC conducted a comprehensive there are identifi ed archeological deposits that lend themselves four-year survey of historic sites in Knoxville and Knox to further study located on the University of Tennessee County.
    [Show full text]
  • Directions from Chattanooga Tennessee to Atlanta Georgia
    Directions From Chattanooga Tennessee To Atlanta Georgia abdicationsInaudible and grandly, capeskin she Janus halloo impose it unpopularly. her glares Is Mohamadconveys while psychometrical Randy disobliges or intimidatory some gambling after unturfed voraciously. Farley Gibb confederated recapitulate so herdraftily? Chattanooga Symphony and Opera: Welcome! With distances between atlanta from cheap last few weeks staying there between the directions from chattanooga tennessee atlanta to georgia avenue at local brewery. This paves the tennessee and chattanooga, content providers and tennessee valley, directions from chattanooga tennessee atlanta to georgia. Blvd toward macon, tullahoma and directions from the united states for the community trust and to chattanooga police officers were not have found. Atlanta, Chickamauga River, and Left and shot the Windy Ridge Bridge. Use the below table to get an idea of how long it could take to get from Chattanooga, giving Atlanta the distinction of being the first city in the deep south to get such service. Blue Ridge Georgia is 90 minutes north of Atlanta via Interstate 75 and Highway 515 Located near the. Directions To Bentley Atlanta Bentley dealership serving the. We here only two hours north of Atlanta two hours south of Knoxville 90 minutes east of Chattanooga and. People would feel free concerts or chattanooga tennessee and directions from chattanooga tennessee to atlanta georgia provide a website in. Please select from chattanooga directions or change without further ado. Weeked Trips from Atlanta or Chattanooga Directions to The. Driving Time from Chattanooga TN to Atlanta GA Travelmath. Charlotte has some great nightlife for people of all ages and relationship statuses.
    [Show full text]
  • Tennessee Integrated Assessment of Watershed Health (PDF)
    November 2015 Tennessee Integrated Assessment of Watershed Health A Report on the Status and Vulnerability of Watershed Health in Tennessee Prepared for— Prepared by— US Environmental Protection Kimberly Matthews, Michele Eddy, Agency Healthy Watersheds and Phillip Jones (RTI) Program Mark Southerland, Brenda Morgan, William Jefferson Clinton Building and Ginny Rogers (Versar) 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. RTI International Washington, DC 20460 3040 E. Cornwallis Road Research Triangle Park, NC 27709 RTI Project Number 0213541.004.002.007 Tennessee Integrated Assessment of Watershed Health November 2015 EPA 841-R-15-002 Prepared by RTI International1 for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Support for this project was provided by the EPA Healthy Watersheds Program (www2.epa.gov/hwp) Disclaimer The information presented in this document is intended to support screening-level assessments of watershed protection priorities and is based on modeled and aggregated data that may have been collected or generated for other purposes. Results should be considered in that context and do not supplant site-specific evidence of watershed health. At times, this document refers to statutory and regulatory provisions, which contain legally binding requirements. This document does not substitute for those provisions or regulations, nor is it a regulation itself. Thus, it does not impose legally binding requirements on EPA, states, authorized tribes, or the public and may not apply to a particular situation based on the circumstances. Reference herein to any specific commercial products, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Linguistic Profiling and Discrimination in the Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
    Article Linguistic Profiling and Discrimination in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt Thor Nordfeld Troelsen Introduction When first sitting down to play a new game, exposition is sorely needed for a player to understand the game world they will be inhabiting. Today, the primary delivery device for this is that of recorded dialogue and voice-over. With voices being presented to us, real-world dialects and associations can be established, which could lead us to infer or draw conclusions and judge them on this basis. This “ability to identify an individual’s race or ethnicity on the basis of voice alone is a phenomenon that has been referred to as linguistic profiling” (Lippi-Green 2012, 122), which can lead to discrimination as shown by John Baugh in his studies about the housing market in the US (Purnell et al. 1999). The consequence of this discrimination can be terrible for those subjected to the stereotypes elicited by their voice, but could stereotyping in media such as video games also be useful? This article explores the possible usefulness for linguistic profiling within video games, through the lens of CD Projekt Red’s The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt (2015), and the unfortunate linguistic discrimination which it might elicit. To do this, the world of the Witcher will be introduced, after which a more thorough explanation of the phenomenon of linguistic profiling will be presented. Following this will be a look at the dialects and accents in The Witcher 3 and why something like linguistic profiling might be important in characterization. This leads into a categorization of most of the varieties of British English that are presented within the game, and how these might be discriminatory.
    [Show full text]